Ramprashad - Open Cylinder Blast
Ramprashad - Open Cylinder Blast
Ramprashad - Open Cylinder Blast
Ramprashad Prabhakaran
Graduate Student
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV)
December 5, 2003
INTRODUCTION
h1
h2 Steel Liner
295 mm
HE: TH 50/50
• Case 2
Since shell was not considered, real constant set number option
was not used here and the cylinder was modeled by using
cylinder option in create command in modeling module.
PRE-PROCESSING : Meshing
Case 1:
Here the cylinder was meshed in the form of both shell and
solid elements. The steel liner was meshed as the shell
elements while the basalt plastic was meshed as solid elements
The model had a total of 6000 elements, out of which 1200 are
shell elements and 4800 are solid elements.
Case 2:
Here the cylinder was meshed in the form of solid elements
only. Both the steel liner and basalt plastic was meshed as solid
elements. The model had 6500 solid elements.
Meshed Model of a Cylinder
(Case I: Composite: Solid and Steel: Shell)
Meshed Model of a Cylinder
(Case II: Composite and Steel: Solid)
In order to specify the type and frequency of generating the output
files, the following keywords were used:
Lot 2: Interchanging 13 double ring layers and 13 double spiral layers. Binder
average mass fraction = 20.0 %.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• Open cylinder models can be used for testing the materials, which
are used in nuclear reactors and containers that are used to store
and/or test explosive materials.
• It has to maintain its integrity in case of accidents, else it can be fatal
to the people in the vicinity as well as to the environment and hence
care should be taken to ensure that these cylinders could resist
blast loading.
• To validate the results obtained experimentally, finite element
analysis using ANSYS and LS-DYNA was performed.
• The values of ε1, ε2, t1, ε3, T and dεε1/dt obtained from LS-POST were
compared with the experimental results. The difference between the
experimental and FEA results was found to be good in most cases.
• However, in some cases the percentage of error was quite large and
this can be attributed to the discrepancies in ConWep function
and/or material properties of the composite cylinder. In addition to
this, a much more finer mesh would have given better results.
REFERENCES