Marketing Experiment - Snickers

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Marketing Experiment

Introduction
This report aims to design a marketing experiment for one of the
strongest brands in the confectionery industry, especially when it
comes to chocolate bars. I’m talking about Snickers. The main product
of the brand consists of nougat topped with caramel and peanuts,
enrobed in milk chocolate. This brand belongs to the American
company Mars, Incorporated and has annual global sales of $2 billion.1

The marketing experiment consists of a price promotion campaign for which will be applied the
before-after design experiment.

Price promotion is a tool to influence consumer purchase; but because price is such a subject
variable (i.e., different people make different judgements of the same price reduction – for
instance, given a -20% discount some people may think that it’s a big drop in the price while
others may think it’s irrelevant) I’m force to use the before-after experiment (this kind of
experiment takes into account the pre-existing differences between the control and the test
groups).

Experiment Design
In this experiment, the independent variable is a price promotion in the form of a 20%
reduction in the unit price. The dependent variable observed here is intention to buy.

The experiment will be run in Barcelona (Spain). It will involve 50.000 people that belong to the
target consumer segment of the brand (i.e., young, male, active adults). Randomly those will
be divided into two groups of 25.000 individuals – the test group and the control group. I
believe this sample, due multicultural environment of the city, will be culturally diverse and big
enough so that it will be statistically significant to draw conclusions of relevance for the
European markets of the brand.

The test will occur in February, during the two weeks. For the “before” stage, the intention to
buy the chocolate bar will be recorded for both control and test markets for the price of 1 euro.
The “after” stage of the experiment will be running in the following week, with the same price
(1 euro) for the control group and the new price (80 cents) for the test group. The change in
sales during the experiment will be then used to calculate the lift in sales.

The experiment adheres to three rules of causality (change in the marketing mix produces
change in intention to buy; no increase in the intention to buy when there is no change in
marketing mix; time sequence (first manipulation in price, then inquiry of intention) but can’t
assure that an external factor won’t mess with the customer’s intention to buy the product.

1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snickers
Anticipated Issues
Chocolate is a seasonal product. Students “abuse” it when it comes to final exams, it is used as
a gift during the Christmas season and there are brands that simply don’t sell them during the
summer time (e.g., Ferrero Rocher). Therefore, the results cannot be generalized without
reservations.

Any other external factor during implementation such the entry of a new brand/product or a
competitive move by an existing competitor could adversely affect the field results. If a new
brand is advertising a really nice chocolate for a little price, the consumer will anchor that price
and might think that the reduction of the Snicker’s bar wasn’t enough to make them want to
buy it.

Nevertheless, we can compare the test group with the control group to calculated the sales lift.

Furthermore, the vast number of people in both groups (50.000 total) will make external
personal factors (e.g., if a respondent loses a job, win the lottery, etc.) almost insignificant.

Experiment adaptation
Another version of the experiment can be through a web experimentation – full factorial design.

In this case we could invited people from all over the world and thus analyze the results for
different markets. Plus, we could test different levels of discount (-20%, -30%, 50%, etc.) and
different framings of the discount (-50%, 50% free, take 2 pay 1, etc.). On top of that, the target
of the brand (and consequently of this experiment) consists of people that have access and use
a computer/internet daily.

This version of experiment is generally cheaper and quicker to implement than the offline face-
to-face questionnaires. However, if this experiment is to be done worldwide it may not be that
cheap or simple since the questionnaires have to be translated into different languages and
take into account the laws of the retail markets of each country (people in charge should know
the “rules” of price promotions for each market).

These pros and cons need to be taken into account when deciding which experiment to choose
from. One thing is certain - this experiment adaptation would offer the optimal combination for
each market.

You might also like