The Caries Microbiome: Implications For Reversing Dysbiosis
The Caries Microbiome: Implications For Reversing Dysbiosis
The Caries Microbiome: Implications For Reversing Dysbiosis
research-article2017
ADRXXX10.1177/0022034517736496Advances in Dental ResearchThe Caries Microbiome
Advances
Advances in Dental Research
2018, Vol. 29(1) 78–85
The Caries Microbiome: Implications © International & American Associations
for Dental Research 2018
Abstract
The oral microbiome plays a critical role in maintaining oral health. Frequent dietary carbohydrate intake can lead to dysbiosis of the
microbial community from overproduction of acid with selection for increases in acidogenic, acid-tolerant bacteria. Knowledge of the
caries-associated microbiome is key in planning approaches to reverse the dysbiosis to achieve health. For risk assessment and treatment
studies, it would be valuable to establish whether microbial monitoring requires assay of multiple species or whether selected key
species would suffice. Early investigations of the oral microbiota relied on culture-based methods to determine the major bacteria in
health and disease. Microbial monitoring using gene probes facilitated study of larger populations. DNA probe methods confirmed and
expanded the importance of transmission of bacteria from mother to infant and association of preselected species, including mutans
streptococci and lactobacilli with caries in larger populations. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) probes confirmed the wide diversity of
species in oral and caries microbiomes. Open-ended techniques provide tools for discovery of new species, particularly when strain/
clone identification includes gene sequence data. Anaerobic culture highlighted the caries association of Actinomyces and related species.
Scardovia wiggsiae, in the Actinomyces/Bifidobacterium family, and several Actinomyces species have the cariogenic traits of acid production
and acid tolerance. Next-generation sequencing combined with polymerase chain reaction methods revealed a strong association with
mutans streptococci in a high caries population with poor oral hygiene and limited access to care. A population with a lower caries
experience generally had lower or no Streptococcus mutans detection but harbored other acidogenic taxa in the microbiome. Study of
the microbiome suggests a role for the assay of selected putative cariogenic species in more aggressive diseases. For many populations
with caries progression, however, assay of multiple species will likely be warranted to determine the caries profile of the population
and/or individuals under study.
Keywords: microbiology, pediatric dentistry, biofilms, Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces, risk assessment
of new anticaries therapies. A major consideration is what on samples from young children with aggressive caries in
components of the microbiome are most efficient, effective, Saipan, Micronesia (Milgrom et al. 2000). Background and
and realistic to monitor to evaluate reversal of the microbiome diet information was obtained by survey and caries status and
dysbiosis to that compatible with health. In this short review, 2 oral microbiota evaluated in 6- to 36-mo infants and that of
hypotheses are considered: 1) monitoring target putative caries their primary caregivers (Tanner et al. 2002). S. mutans was the
pathogens (e.g., S. mutans and Lactobacillus species) or 2) primary caries-associated species, and its detection in the
monitoring the community seeking upset of balance away from infants was strongly associated with its detection in the child’s
health. A more detailed review of the caries microbiome was primary caregiver (Tanner et al. 2002). Indeed, all the 38
previously presented (Tanner et al. 2016). assayed species that included caries, gingival, and periodontal
species were detected more frequently in children when also
detected in the caregiver. The age at which species were
Exploring the Caries Microbiome detected was more strongly associated with species detection
The bacteria on teeth related to dental caries have been studied in the caregiver than the infant age. Implications for therapy
for over 100 y using microbial methods contemporary to the from these observations include that any treatments designed
time of study. An early director of The Forsyth Institute, Percy to prevent or reduce colonization of S. mutans would need to
Howe, published a paper on the microbiology of dental caries in start very early. Furthermore, the high concordance between
1917 that noted the key role of bacteria currently recognized as the microbiota detected in caregivers and infants indicates the
Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. Howe also pio- value of treating caregivers/mothers to reduce the likelihood of
neered chemotherapeutic treatments incorporating silver (Brown transmission of pathogenic species.
1952), approaches that have had a resurgence of interest. In another population in Boston, Massachusetts, young chil-
Microbial studies into dental caries continued at The Forsyth dren were monitored for the presence of caries during an
Institute. Harold Jordan and coworkers showed microbial trans- extended pediatrician well-child visit (Nunn et al. 2009).
mission between mothers to children using bacteriocin typing Demographic, dietary, and diet history data were obtained from
of S. mutans (Berkowitz and Jordan 1975). Ronald Gibbons the child’s caregiver in addition to oral microbial samples from
considered S. mutans as a major pathogen of dental caries and, children. Bacteria were assayed by DNA probes and by poly-
with van Houte, demonstrated increased adherence of S. mutans merase chain reaction (PCR) for S. mutans (Kanasi, Johansson,
for tooth surfaces over other oral mucosal sites (Gibbons and et al. 2010). There was a higher detection frequency of species
van Houte 1971). With Caufield, Gibbons studied efficacy of including S. mutans and other caries-associated species from
topical iodine for suppressing S. mutans (Caufield and Gibbons tooth than tongue samples, suggesting that sampling the tongue
1979). van Houte also published seminal microbiology findings could underestimate detection of S. mutans and other caries-
in caries etiology that continue to provide background to studies associated species. Comparing microbial methods, a species-
today. van Houte was a strong advocate of a caries microbiota specific PCR assay for S. mutans yielded a higher detection
that did not rely on S. mutans solely for cariogenicity, and he frequency in caries children than the DNA probe assay, suggest-
described the acidogenicity and caries association of several ing improved detection sensitivity by the more targeted PCR
bacterial groups, including nonmutans streptococci and bifido- method. In modeling of the microbial data by caries status by
bacteria in addition to lactobacilli and S. mutans (van Houte et partial least squares regression, there was a higher specificity
al. 1996; van Houte et al. 1991). Several studies demonstrated for S. mutans with caries detection with the PCR assay than by
that anaerobic approaches improved viable recovery of oral probes. Further different associations with caries with several
bacteria, including those associated with dental caries by Lactobacillus and Actinomyces species were observed. These
Loesche and coworkers (Loesche and Syed 1973). Findings observations suggest specificity in the microbiome of dental
from these studies were replicated by other investigators caries at the species level for several genera and that an all
(Hardie et al. 1977) to provide a background for understanding Lactobacillus species assay, as from a selective medium or
the composition of the caries-associated biofilm to include genus PCR test, may not differentiate the caries-associated lac-
specific highly aciduric and acidogenic species, particularly tobacilli from probiotic health–associated species.
S. mutans, and other acidogenic species in Actinomyces, In both of these populations of young children, S. mutans
Bifidobacterium, and nonmutans streptococci. was the principal caries-associated species observed, although
the association was microbiological method dependent: tar-
geted assay by PCR was more sensitive than a multispecies
Preselected Species Assay probe approach.
Using DNA Probes
Molecular methods using DNA and 16S ribosomal RNA Open-Ended Microbiology Methods,
(rRNA)–based probes facilitated analysis of oral bacteria from 16S rRNA-Based, Anaerobic Culture,
more individuals than with culture-based methods. In one
Next-Generation Sequencing
approach, DNA probes made from cultured bacterial species
and bacterial samples were applied to membranes in a checker- The whole genomic probes were limited to detecting a
board-type array (Socransky et al. 1994). This assay was used preselected set of cultured species and limits enquiry into
80 Advances in Dental Research 29(1)
Table. Acid Tolerance (Measured as Growth on Agar pH 5.5) and Acidogenicity (Measured as Final pH in Growth Medium) of Mutans Streptococci,
Scardovia, and Actinomyces Strains.
Final pH Readings
Growth
Agar Initial pH 7.0 Initial pH 5.5
a b b b b
Bacterial Strains pH 5.5 Glucose Sucrose Fructose Glucose Sucroseb Fructoseb
Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 2 3.83 ± 0.00 3.76 ± 0.00 3.79 ± 0.00 3.95 ± 0.02 3.87 ± 0.00 3.89 ± 0.00
Streptococcus mutans SJ 2 3.86 ± 0.00 3.82 ± 0.00 3.80 ± 0.00 4.11 ± 0.01 4.05 ± 0.00 4.06 ± 0.00
Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 33478 2 2.98 ± 0.01 2.97 ± 0.02 2.91 ± 0.01 3.78 ± 0.05 3.71 ± 0.00 3.68 ± 0.00
Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 27352/6715 2 3.72 ± 0.03 3.73 ± 0.00 3.74 ± 0.00 3.99 ± 0.01 4.01 ± 0.01 4.03 ± 0.00
Scardovia wiggsiae DSM 22547/C155A 2 3.30 ± 0.01 3.36 ± 0.01 3.12 ± 0.01 3.47 ± 0.03 3.65 ± 0.03 3.52 ± 0.03
Scardovia wiggsiae H42A2/F0424 2 3.51 ± 0.02 3.26 ± 0.00 3.23 ± 0.05 4.02 ± 0.03 3.85 ± 0.02 3.75 ± 0.01
Actinomyces johnsonii (H122B8) 2 3.43 ± 0.01 3.48 ± 0.01 3.49 ± 0.01 4.09 ± 0.01 4.12 ± 0.01 4.10 ± 0.01
Actinomyces sp. HOT 170 (A84A17) 2 3.52 ± 0.04 3.44 ± 0.00 3.40 ± 0.00 3.75 ± 0.07 3.82 ± 0.01 3.89 ± 0.00
Actinomyces oris (H49B49) 1 3.77 ± 0.00 3.70 ± 0.01 3.83 ± 0.01 4.29 ± 0.00 4.27 ± 0.01 4.29 ± 0.00
Actinomyces naeslundii I (H101A18) 1 3.80 ± 0.02 3.82 ± 0.01 3.87 ± 0.02 4.21 ± 0.01 4.21 ± 0.01 4.12 ± 0.04
Actinomyces sp. HOT 179 (A62A40) 2 3.82 ± 0.00 3.80 ± 0.00 3.84 ± 0.00 4.28 ± 0.02 4.25 ± 0.00 4.25 ± 0.00
Actinomyces sp. HOT 448 (T39B26) 2 3.88 ± 0.00 3.91 ± 0.02 3.98 ± 0.03 4.26 ± 0.01 4.24 ± 0.00 4.19 ± 0.04
Actinomyces graevenitzii (A62A23) 2 3.95 ± 0.01 4.01 ± 0.00 4.01 ± 0.00 3.27 ± 0.02 3.34 ± 0.02 3.26 ± 0.00
Actinomyces dentalis (H22B8) 1 4.11 ± 0.00 4.07 ± 0.01 4.08 ± 0.06 4.24 ± 0.01 4.25 ± 0.01 4.21 ± 0.03
Actinomyces sp. HOT 180 (T17B14) 2 4.12 ± 0.13 3.97 ± 0.00 3.88 ± 0.02 4.17 ± 0.00 4.16 ± 0.00 4.15 ± 0.02
Actinomyces sp. HOT 177 (H49B36) 2 4.18 ± 0.00 4.17 ± 0.00 4.29 ± 0.00 3.69 ± 0.01 3.76 ± 0.01 3.80 ± 0.00
Actinomyces sp. HOT 171 (H49B26) 2 4.18 ± 0.01 4.22 ± 0.04 4.32 ± 0.11 4.31 ± 0.01 4.35 ± 0.00 4.32 ± 0.01
Actinomyces sp. HOT 172 (H304PB12) 2 4.26 ± 0.03 4.27 ± 0.01 4.25 ± 0.01 4.14 ± 0.05 4.06 ± 0.02 4.01 ± 0.02
Actinomyces sp. HOT 169 (T1B18) 1 4.28 ± 0.05 4.21 ± 0.01 4.19 ± 0.01 4.36 ± 0.04 4.26 ± 0.00 4.28 ± 0.04
Actinomyces sp. HOT 178 (H11B25) 1 4.36 ± 0.01 4.34 ± 0.01 4.22 ± 0.00 4.43 ± 0.01 4.43 ± 0.00 4.30 ± 0.00
Actinomyces sp. HOT 877 (T1B25) 1 4.38 ± 0.03 4.43 ± 0.00 4.23 ± 0.00 4.43 ± 0.02 4.52 ± 0.00 4.31 ± 0.00
Actinomyces gerencseriae (H74B34) 1 4.52 ± 0.02 4.57 ± 0.00 4.51 ± 0.01 3.85 ± 0.01 3.92 ± 0.03 3.80 ± 0.04
Actinomyces odontolyticus (H106B16) 1 4.63 ± 0.05 4.69 ± 0.01 4.57 ± 0.00 4.48 ± 0.04 4.54 ± 0.00 4.45 ± 0.00
Actinomyces israelii (A87A37) 1 4.65 ± 0.03 4.66 ± 0.13 4.66 ± 0.10 3.85 ± 0.00 4.09 ± 0.01 4.02 ± 0.12
Actinomyces naeslundii II (H403B5) 1 4.69 ± 0.03 4.56 ± 0.00 4.68 ± 0.05 4.57 ± 0.01 4.56 ± 0.00 4.59 ± 0.00
Actinomyces sp. HOT 175 (T20B12) 1 4.75 ± 0.02 4.71 ± 0.02 4.85 ± 0.01 4.55 ± 0.01 4.54 ± 0.01 4.61 ± 0.02
Actinomyces meyeri (H101A17) 2 4.79 ± 0.06 4.45 ± 0.01 4.48 ± 0.00 4.34 ± 0.46 3.75 ± 0.02 3.75 ± 0.04
Actinomyces sp. HOT 181 (H304PA1) 2 4.94 ± 0.01 4.22 ± 0.01 4.21 ± 0.00 4.55 ± 0.05 4.11 ± 0.01 4.12 ± 0.02
Actinomyces massiliensis (T20B27) 2 5.13 ± 0.02 5.15 ± 0.04 5.18 ± 0.03 4.83 ± 0.03 4.92 ± 0.05 4.93 ± 0.05
Actinomyces georgiae (T41B19) 1 5.42 ± 0.10 5.16 ± 0.13 5.15 ± 0.03 4.50 ± 0.05 4.28 ± 0.06 4.34 ± 0.04
Final pH glucose broth: bold = pH <4.0, italic = pH 4 to <4.5, bold italic = pH ≥4.5 Actinomyces strains showed a range of final pH values in media at
initial pH 7 and pH 5.5. Differences were significant between strains at initial pH 7 for all groups (P < 0.01) but not for media at initial pH 5.5 (P < 0.05)
when tested by analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment. Strains tested were either reference strains or clinical isolates (Tanner, Kressirer, et al.
2011). Strains for testing were cultured anaerobically on blood agar. For low pH agar growth, medium containing Bacto yeast agar (10 g/L), brain heart
infusion (26 g/L), and tryptic soy agar (20 g/L) was prepared and pH adjusted using 0.2 N HCl to pH 7.0 and pH 5.5. After test strains were inoculated
and incubated anaerobically for 3 to 4 d, growth on agar at pH 5.5 was compared with that at pH 7.0. For acid production, neutralized soya peptone
(5 g/L), trypicase peptone pancreatic digest of casein (3 g/L), and Bacto yeast extract (10 g/L) was prepared without added carbohydrate and filter
sterilized sugars added to final concentrations of 1% glucose, 1% sucrose, 1% fructose, or no added sugar for controls and distributed in flat-bottomed
96-well microtiter plates. Broths were inoculated with suspensions of test strains and incubated anaerobically for 48 h. Final pH values were read with
a microelectrode. Tests were run in triplicate and mean values and standard deviation of the mean calculated.
a
2 = equivalent to growth on agar at pH 7. 1 = less than growth on agar at pH 7.
b
Mean of triplicate readings ± standard deviation of mean.
Next-generation sequencing is a molecular open-ended S. mutans in the Romanian children: 85.7% compared to
approach to investigate the microbiome and was used in paral- 50% in the caries-active Swedish children. Detection of the
lel with PCR to evaluate microbiotas of Swedish and Romanian Streptococcus sobrinus was significantly different between
adolescent populations that had very different access to dental populations at 50% of the Romanian children but not detected
care and caries experience (Johansson et al. 2016). Adolescents in the Swedish population examined. Thus, clear differences in
from Romania, mean age 14.4 y and minimal previous expo- association of mutans streptococci with caries was observed,
sure to dental care, on examination had abundant plaque and a which appeared associated with extent of caries, access to den-
mean decayed missing filling surface (DMFS) score of 20.1. tal care, and lower socioeconomic status in general.
This contrasted from 17-y-old Swedish caries-free and caries- The microbiome assayed by next-generation sequencing
active (mean DMFS 7.5) children who had experienced routine revealed the microbial diversity and microbiomes that charac-
dental care and had minimal detectable dental plaque. In addi- terized caries-active Romanian, caries-active Swedish, and
tion to a higher caries experience in the Romanian than caries-free children beyond S. mutans (Johansson et al. 2016)
Swedish adolescents, there was a higher detection frequency of (Fig. 3). In addition to S. mutans and S. sobrinus, the more
The Caries Microbiome 83
Figure 3. Microbiome of Romanian (high caries, blue), Swedish (low caries, yellow), and Swedish caries-free adolescents (red). Partial least squares
(PLS) regression modeling using caries grouping, microbiota from pyrosequencing, and sweet snack intake (Johansson et al. 2016). (A) PLS scatterplot
illustrating separate clustering of the low-, high-, and no-caries groups based on the microbiota and diet. (B) PLS loading plot of the microbial variables
separating the clinical groups highlighting the Streptococcus and Actinomyces taxa, the major-acid producing taxa, in each clinical condition and numbers
of taxa detected in each group. Figure modified from Figure 3 in Johansson et al. (2016).
acidogenic microbiota of the higher caries Romanian children was characterized by 8 Actinomyces species, not characteristic
included several nonmutans Streptococcus species. The micro- of the Swedish caries children, and nonmutans streptococci.
biota that characterized the Swedish population with caries Comparison of the caries microbiota of these 2 very different
included, among the more fermentative species, unnamed populations highlights differences in the association of S. mutans
Actinomyces taxa and Streptococcus constellatus. In contrast, in relation to caries, particularly clear since both populations
the acidogenic microbiota of the Swedish caries-free children were monitored at the same time by the same microbiological
84 Advances in Dental Research 29(1)
Nunn ME, Dietrich T, Singh HK, Henshaw MM, Kressin NR. 2009. Prevalence anaerobic microbiota of severe early childhood caries. J Clin Microbiol.
of early childhood caries among very young urban Boston children com- 49(4):1464–1474.
pared with us children. J Public Health Dent. 69(3):156–162. Tanner AC, Milgrom PM, Kent R Jr, Mokeem SA, Page RC, Liao SI, Riedy
Palmer CA, Kent R, Jr., Loo CY, Hughes CV, Stutius E, Pradhan N, Dahlan CA, Bruss JB. 2002. Similarity of the oral microbiota of pre-school children
M, Kanasi E, Arevalo Vasquez SS, Tanner AC. 2010. Diet and caries- with that of their caregivers in a population-based study. Oral Microbiol
associated bacteria in severe early childhood caries. J Dent Res. 89(11): Immunol. 17(6):379–387.
1224–1229. Tanner AC, Sonis AL, Lif Holgerson P, Starr JR, Nunez Y, Kressirer CA,
Preza D, Olsen I, Willumsen T, Boches SK, Cotton SL, Grinde B, Paster BJ. Paster BJ, Johansson I. 2012. White-spot lesions and gingivitis microbiotas
2009. Microarray analysis of the microflora of root caries in elderly. Eur J in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 91(9):853–858.
Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 28(5):509–517. Torlakovic L, Klepac-Ceraj V, Ogaard B, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, Olsen I. 2012.
Socransky SS, Smith C, Martin L, Paster BJ, Dewhirst FE, Levin AE. 1994. Microbial community succession on developing lesions on human enamel.
“Checkerboard” DNA-DNA hybridization. Biotechniques. 17(4):788–792. J Oral Microbiol. 4(1):e16125.
Takahashi N, Nyvad B. 2011. The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecologi- van Houte J. 1994. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res.
cal perspectives. J Dent Res. 90(3):294–303. 73(3):672–681.
Tanner AC. 2015. Anaerobic culture to detect periodontal and caries pathogens. van Houte J, Lopman J, Kent R. 1994. The predominant cultivable flora of
J Oral Biosci. 57(1):18–26. sound and carious human root surfaces. J Dent Res. 73(11):1727–1734.
Tanner AC, Kent RL, Jr, Holgerson PL, Hughes CV, Loo CY, Kanasi E, van Houte J, Lopman J, Kent R. 1996. The final pH of bacteria comprising the
Chalmers NI, Johansson I. 2011. Microbiota of severe early childhood car- predominant flora on sound and carious human root and enamel surfaces.
ies before and after therapy. J Dent Res. 90(11):1298–1305. J Dent Res. 75(4):1008–1014.
Tanner AC, Kressirer CA, Faller LL. 2016. Understanding caries from the oral van Houte J, Sansone C, Joshipura K, Kent R. 1991. Mutans streptococci and
microbiome perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc. 44(7):437–446. non-mutans streptococci acidogenic at low pH, and in vitro acidogenic
Tanner AC, Mathney JM, Kent RL, Chalmers NI, Hughes CV, Loo CY, potential of dental plaque in two different areas of the human dentition.
Pradhan N, Kanasi E, Hwang J, Dahlan MA, et al. 2011. Cultivable J Dent Res. 70(12):1503–1507.