IFRS and IAS Compliance Analysis of Singer Bangladesh Limited
IFRS and IAS Compliance Analysis of Singer Bangladesh Limited
IFRS and IAS Compliance Analysis of Singer Bangladesh Limited
Prepared For
James Bakul Sarker
Associate Professor
United International University
Prepared By
Name ID
Asifa Ahmed Bisme 114 171 006
M Iftekher Hossain 114 171 012
Sayma Sultana Lina 114 171 017
Faria Afroz 114 171 019
Sumaiya Hasem 114 171 022
Here is the report you assigned us to prepare, on “IFRS and IAS Compliance Analysis of Singer
Bangladesh Limited” for this course. In this report we tried to show if SBL is following the
accounting standards and if they are then how they following. We have covered all the necessary
elements that should be included in this report.
Besides, we are still students and in a process of developing our skill. So, we hope that you will
be kind enough to consider the limitation of this report.
Thank you for giving us such an opportunity for working on the topic. We will be honored to
provide you any additional information, if necessary.
Sincerely yours,
Faria Afroz
It is a great contentment to express our deep sense of gratitude to our honorable course teacher
Dr. James Bakul Sarkar for giving us an opportunity to prepare a report on “IFRS and IAS
Compliance Analysis of Singer Bangladesh Limited” as a part of the course - “Corporate
Financial Reporting (AIS 4303)”.
Our honorable course teacher helped us on our report every way possible. He taught us the IAS
and IFRS standards and make us understand how we can implement the standards in a real case.
And is the reason we could complete our report successfully.
We are also grateful to all the people who helped us to collect the information regarding the
report.
Therefore, we want to pay our gratitude to our course teacher again for giving us the greatest
opportunity to work on such a topic that will be very helpful in our future.
Scope & Limitation
Scope:
The report contents almost all important and correct information of IAS and IFRS and also the
annual report 2018 of Singer Bangladesh Limited. We have tried to elaborate the every standard
and their implement in the company’s annual report. Hope that it will help people to know about
these standards elaborately. It will also help them-
Limitation:
Besides scopes, this report has some limitation as well. Here we enlist the limitation of the
report:
The report contains only the basic explanation and information of standards.
We only discuss about the implementation of standards which are available in the annual
report.
We couldn’t completely understand some of the standard because of our lack of
knowledge.
There may be some printing mistakes, some syntax error and other defects.
Despite of these limitations, we tried to make this report as informative and analytical as possible
and we hope that report will be able to give one a brief knowledge about IAS and IFRS and one
can get basic information of standards.
Executive Summary
Accounting standards are very important when a company is making its financial statements.
Because standards ensure that the financial statements from multiple companies are comparable.
So that users of the statements can take the effective decisions. In our report, we showed the
practical implementation of IAS and IFRS by using the annual report 2018 of Singer Bangladesh
Limited. Here, we mentioned if the company is using the standards and if they then how they are
implementing it. We mentioned the standards which are not available on the annual report or not
applicable for the company. Precise discussion of all the standards of IAS and IFRS is in the
report. And then we described how these standards effect annual report 2018 of Singer
Bangladesh Limited.
Contents
Introduction
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was established in June 1973 by
accountancy bodies representing ten countries. It devised and published International Accounting
Standards (IAS) in 1973, interpretations and a conceptual framework. These were looked to by
many national accounting standard-setters in developing national standards.
The goal of IAS is to make it easier to compare businesses around the world, increase
transparency and trust in financial reporting, and foster global trade and investment. There are 41
IAS on total. Only 29 IAS are active now.
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was established in June 1973 by
accountancy bodies representing ten countries. It devised and published International Accounting
Standards (IAS), interpretations and a conceptual framework. These were looked to by many
national accounting standard-setters in developing national standards. The IASB has continued to
develop standards calling the new standards "International Financial Reporting Standards"
(IFRS). In total 17 IFRS has been issued.
In our report we are showing how SINGER corporation compliance International Accounting
Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards for providing the information in the
Annual Report 2018.
Objectives
Major Objective:
Discuss the standards and know the practical implementation of those on the annual
report 2018 of Singer Bangladesh Limited
Minor Objectives:
The singer saga began in 1851, when Sir Issac Merrit Singer with US$ 40 in the borrowed capital
began to manufacture and sell a machine to automate and assist in the making of clothing. This
revolutionary product was the first offering from the newly formed I.M Singer and company,
which has now evolved into the world leader in the manufacturing and distribution of sewing
related products. The SINGER brand name is now famous around the globe.
The presence of SINGER in Bangladesh dates back to the British Colonial era when the country
was a part of the Indian subcontinent. The first operation of SINGER began in 1905. Later, in
1920, two shops were set up in Dhaka and Chittagong.
A change in investment policy in 1979 created new business opportunities and SINGER
registered as an operating company, with 80% of the share held by singer Sewing Machine
Company (SSMC), USA and 20% by local shareholders. In 1993 the company was listed with
Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) and offered 25% of its total capitalization- 2,565 ordinary share of
100 each. It was listed also with the Chittagong Stock Exchange. Thus, the transformation of
SINGER from a single product sewing machine company into a multiproduct consumer durable
company began in 1985 for further growth and expansion.
VISION: To be the most admired and respected family company in the country.
MISION: Our mission is to improve the Quality of life of the people by providing comforts and
conveniences at affordable.
In our report we are showing how SINGER corporation compliance International Accounting
Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards for providing the information in the
Annual Report 2018.
International Accounting Standards
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements sets out the overall requirements for financial
statements, including how they should be structured, the minimum requirements for their content
and overriding concepts such as going concern, the accrual basis of accounting and the
current/non-current distinction. The standard requires a complete set of financial statements to
comprise a statement of financial position, a statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income, a statement of changes in equity and a statement of cash flows. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Income and expenses, including gains and losses
Contributions by and distributions to owners (in their capacity as owners)
Cash flows.
That information, along with other information in the notes, assists users of financial statements
in predicting the entity's future cash flows and, in particular, their timing and certainty.
An entity may use titles for the statements other than those stated above. All financial statements
are required to be presented with equal prominence. [IAS 1.10]
Reports that are presented outside of the financial statements – including financial reviews by
management, environmental reports, and value-added statements – are outside the scope of
IFRSs. [IAS 1.14]
The financial statements must "present fairly" the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of an entity. Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of
transactions, other events, and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition
criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Framework. The application of
IFRSs, with additional disclosure when necessary, is presumed to result in financial statements
that achieve a fair presentation. [IAS 1.15]
IAS 1 requires an entity whose financial statements comply with IFRSs to make an explicit and
unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. Financial statements cannot be described
as complying with IFRSs unless they comply with all the requirements of IFRSs (which includes
International Financial Reporting Standards, International Accounting Standards, IFRIC
Interpretations and SIC Interpretations). [IAS 1.16]
Inappropriate accounting policies are not rectified either by disclosure of the accounting policies
used or by notes or explanatory material. [IAS 1.18]
IAS 1 acknowledges that, in extremely rare circumstances, management may conclude that
compliance with an IFRS requirement would be so misleading that it would conflict with the
objective of financial statements set out in the Framework. In such a case, the entity is required
to depart from the IFRS requirement, with detailed disclosure of the nature, reasons, and impact
of the departure. [IAS 1.19-21]
Going concern
The Conceptual Framework notes that financial statements are normally prepared assuming the
entity is a going concern and will continue in operation for the foreseeable future. [Conceptual
Framework, paragraph 4.1]
IAS 1 requires that an entity prepare its financial statements, except for cash flow information,
using the accrual basis of accounting. [IAS 1.27]
Consistency of presentation
The presentation and classification of items in the financial statements shall be retained from one
period to the next unless a change is justified either by a change in circumstances or a
requirement of a new IFRS. [IAS 1.45]
Each material class of similar items must be presented separately in the financial statements.
Dissimilar items may be aggregated only if they are individually immaterial. [IAS 1.29]
* Clarified by Definition of Material (Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8), effective 1 January
2020.
Offsetting
Assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, may not be offset unless required or permitted
by an IFRS. [IAS 1.32]
Comparative information
IAS 1 requires that comparative information to be disclosed in respect of the previous period for
all amounts reported in the financial statements, both on the face of the financial statements and
in the notes, unless another Standard requires otherwise. Comparative information is provided
for narrative and descriptive where it is relevant to understanding the financial statements of the
current period. [IAS 1.38]
An entity is required to present at least two of each of the following primary financial statements:
[IAS 1.38A]
Where comparative amounts are changed or reclassified, various disclosures are required. [IAS
1.41]
In addition, the following information must be displayed prominently, and repeated as necessary:
[IAS 1.51]
the name of the reporting entity and any change in the name
whether the financial statements are a group of entities or an individual entity
information about the reporting period
the presentation currency (as defined by IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign
Exchange Rates)
the level of rounding used (e.g. thousands, millions).
Reporting period
There is a presumption that financial statements will be prepared at least annually. If the annual
reporting period changes and financial statements are prepared for a different period, the entity
must disclose the reason for the change and state that amounts are not entirely comparable. [IAS
1.36]
Statement of financial position (balance sheet)
An entity must normally present a classified statement of financial position, separating current
and non-current assets and liabilities, unless presentation based on liquidity provides information
that is reliable. [IAS 1.60] In either case, if an asset (liability) category combines amounts that
will be received (settled) after 12 months with assets (liabilities) that will be received (settled)
within 12 months, note disclosure is required that separates the longer-term amounts from the
12-month amounts. [IAS 1.61]
If a liability has become payable on demand because an entity has breached an undertaking
under a long-term loan agreement on or before the reporting date, the liability is current, even if
the lender has agreed, after the reporting date and before the authorization of the financial
statements for issue, not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. [IAS 1.74]
However, the liability is classified as non-current if the lender agreed by the reporting date to
provide a period of grace ending at least 12 months after the end of the reporting period, within
which the entity can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand immediate
repayment. [IAS 1.75]
Settlement by the issue of equity instruments does not impact classification. [IAS 1.76B]
Line items
The line items to be included on the face of the statement of financial position are: [IAS 1.54]
(d) financial assets (excluding amounts shown under (e), (h), and (i))
(g) inventories
(l) provisions
(m) financial liabilities (excluding amounts shown under (k) and (l))
(n) current tax liabilities and current tax assets, as defined in IAS 12
(o) deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, as defined in IAS 12
Additional line items, headings and subtotals may be needed to fairly present the entity's
financial position. [IAS 1.55]
When an entity presents subtotals, those subtotals shall be comprised of line items made up of
amounts recognized and measured in accordance with IFRS; be presented and labelled in a clear
and understandable manner; be consistent from period to period; and not be displayed with more
prominence than the required subtotals and totals. [IAS 1.55A]*
Further sub-classifications of line items presented are made in the statement or in the notes, for
example: [IAS 1.77-78]:
Format of statement
IAS 1 does not prescribe the format of the statement of financial position. Assets can be
presented current then non-current, or vice versa, and liabilities and equity can be presented
current then non-current then equity, or vice versa. A net asset presentation (assets minus
liabilities) is allowed. The long-term financing approach used in UK and elsewhere – fixed assets
+ current assets - short term payables = long-term debt plus equity – is also acceptable.
numbers of shares authorised, issued and fully paid, and issued but not fully paid
par value (or that shares do not have a par value)
a reconciliation of the number of shares outstanding at the beginning and the end of the
period
description of rights, preferences, and restrictions
treasury shares, including shares held by subsidiaries and associates
shares reserved for issuance under options and contracts
a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve within equity.
Additional disclosures are required in respect of entities without share capital and where an
entity has reclassified puttable financial instruments. [IAS 1.80-80A]
Profit or loss is defined as "the total of income less expenses, excluding the components of other
comprehensive income". Other comprehensive income is defined as comprising "items of
income and expense (including reclassification adjustments) that are not recognised in profit or
loss as required or permitted by other IFRSs". Total comprehensive income is defined as "the
change in equity during a period resulting from transactions and other events, other than those
changes resulting from transactions with owners in their capacity as owners". [IAS 1.7]
All items of income and expense recognized in a period must be included in profit or loss unless
a Standard or an Interpretation requires otherwise. [IAS 1.88] Some IFRSs require or permit that
some components to be excluded from profit or loss and instead to be included in other
comprehensive income.
a single statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with profit or loss
and other comprehensive income presented in two sections, or
two statements:
a separate statement of profit or loss
a statement of comprehensive income, immediately following the statement of profit
or loss and beginning with profit or loss [IAS 1.10A]
profit or loss
total other comprehensive income
comprehensive income for the period
an allocation of profit or loss and comprehensive income for the period between non-
controlling interests and owners of the parent.
The following minimum line items must be presented in the profit or loss section (or separate
statement of profit or loss, if presented): [IAS 1.82-82A]
revenue
gains and losses from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost
finance costs
share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity
method
certain gains or losses associated with the reclassification of financial assets
tax expense
a single amount for the total of discontinued items
Expenses recognized in profit or loss should be analyzed either by nature (raw materials, staffing
costs, depreciation, etc.) or by function (cost of sales, selling, administrative, etc). [IAS 1.99] If
an entity categorizes by function, then additional information on the nature of expenses – at a
minimum depreciation, amortization and employee benefits expense – must be disclosed. [IAS
1.104]
The other comprehensive income section is required to present line items which are classified by
their nature, and grouped between those items that will or will not be reclassified to profit and
loss in subsequent periods. [IAS 1.82A]
When an entity presents subtotals, those subtotals shall be comprised of line items made up of
amounts recognized and measured in accordance with IFRS; be presented and labelled in a clear
and understandable manner; be consistent from period to period; not be displayed with more
prominence than the required subtotals and totals; and reconciled with the subtotals or totals
required in IFRS. [IAS 1.85A-85B]*
Other requirements
Additional line items may be needed to fairly present the entity's results of operations. [IAS 1.85]
Items cannot be presented as 'extraordinary items' in the financial statements or in the notes.
[IAS 1.87]
Certain items must be disclosed separately either in the statement of comprehensive income or in
the notes, if material, including: [IAS 1.98]
Rather than setting out separate requirements for presentation of the statement of cash flows, IAS
1.111 refers to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows.
IAS 1 requires an entity to present a separate statement of changes in equity. The statement must
show: [IAS 1.106]
total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately amounts attributable to
owners of the parent and to non-controlling interests
the effects of any retrospective application of accounting policies or restatements made in
accordance with IAS 8, separately for each component of other comprehensive income
reconciliations between the carrying amounts at the beginning and the end of the period
for each component of equity, separately disclosing:
profit or loss
other comprehensive income*
transactions with owners, showing separately contributions by and distributions
to owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result
in a loss of control
The following amounts may also be presented on the face of the statement of changes in equity,
or they may be presented in the notes: [IAS 1.107]
present information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and the
specific accounting policies used
disclose any information required by IFRSs that is not presented elsewhere in the
financial statements and
provide additional information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements
but is relevant to an understanding of any of them
Notes are presented in a systematic manner and cross-referenced from the face of the financial
statements to the relevant note. [IAS 1.113]
IAS 1.114 suggests that the notes should normally be presented in the following order:*
* Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 1), effective 1 January 2016, clarifies this order just
to be an example of how notes can be ordered and adds additional examples of possible ways of
ordering the notes to clarify that understandability and comparability should be considered when
determining the order of the notes.
Other disclosures
An entity must disclose, in the summary of significant accounting policies or other notes, the
judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that management has made in the process of
applying the entity's accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts
recognized in the financial statements. [IAS 1.122]
when substantially all the significant risks and rewards of ownership of financial assets
and lease assets are transferred to other entities
whether, in substance, particular sales of goods are financing arrangements and therefore
do not give rise to revenue.
An entity must also disclose, in the notes, information about the key assumptions concerning the
future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that
have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities within the next financial year. [IAS 1.125] These disclosures do not involve disclosing
budgets or forecasts. [IAS 1.130]
Dividends
In addition to the distribution’s information in the statement of changes in equity (see above), the
following must be disclosed in the notes: [IAS 1.137]
the amount of dividends proposed or declared before the financial statements were
authorised for issue but which were not recognised as a distribution to owners during the
period, and the related amount per share
the amount of any cumulative preference dividends not recognised.
Capital disclosures
An entity discloses information about its objectives, policies and processes for managing capital.
[IAS 1.134] To comply with this, the disclosures include: [IAS 1.135]
qualitative information about the entity's objectives, policies and processes for managing
capital, including
description of capital it manages
nature of external capital requirements, if any
how it is meeting its objectives
quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital
changes from one period to another
whether the entity has complied with any external capital requirements and
if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance.
IAS 1.136A requires the following additional disclosures if an entity has a puttable instrument
that is classified as an equity instrument:
Other information
The following other note disclosures are required by IAS 1 if not disclosed elsewhere in
information published with the financial statements: [IAS 1.138]
Terminology
The 2007 comprehensive revision to IAS 1 introduced some new terminology. Consequential
amendments were made at that time to all of the other existing IFRSs, and the new terminology
has been used in subsequent IFRSs including amendments. IAS 1.8 states: "Although this
Standard uses the terms 'other comprehensive income', 'profit or loss' and 'total comprehensive
income', an entity may use other terms to describe the totals as long as the meaning is clear. For
example, an entity may use the term 'net income' to describe profit or loss." Also, IAS 1.57(b)
states: "The descriptions used and the ordering of items or aggregation of similar items may be
amended according to the nature of the entity and its transactions, to provide information that is
relevant to an understanding of the entity's financial position." [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
position."
removed from equity and recognised in reclassified from equity to profit or loss
profit or loss ('recycling') as a reclassification adjustment
on the face of In
SBL have presented the financial statements of International Appliances Limited (the Company),
which comprise the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018, and the statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of
cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of
significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements give a true
and fair view of the financial position of the Company as at 31 December 2018, and its financial
performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRSs), the Companies Act 1994 and other applicable laws and
regulations. [ CITATION Sng \l 18441 ]
The financial statements of SBL have been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted in Bangladesh by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh, the Companies Act 1994, Bangladesh Securities and
Exchange Ordinance 1969, Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Rules 1987, Listing Regulations
of Dhaka and Chittagong Stock Exchanges and other relevant local laws as applicable.
The Company has adequate resources to continue in operation for foreseeable future and hence,
the financial statements have been prepared on going concern basis. As per management
assessment there are no material uncertainties related to events or conditions which may cast
significant doubt upon the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The Board of Directors of your Company recommended 30% Stock dividend (3 ordinary shares
for every 10 shares) per Ordinary share of taka 10 each.
The financial period of the Company covers one year from 1 January to 31 December.
Comment
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS 1 — Presentation of Financial Statements.
IAS 2 — Inventories
IAS 2 Inventories contains the requirements on how to account for most types of inventory. The
standard requires inventories to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV)
and outlines acceptable methods of determining cost, including specific identification (in some
cases), first-in first-out (FIFO) and weighted average cost.
Measurement of inventories
costs of purchase (including taxes, transport, and handling) net of trade discounts
received
other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition
Inventory cost should not include: [IAS 2.16 and 2.18]
abnormal waste
storage costs
selling costs
interest cost when inventories are purchased with deferred settlement terms.
The standard cost and retail methods may be used for the measurement of cost, provided that the
results approximate actual cost. [IAS 2.21-22]
For inventory items that are not interchangeable, specific costs are attributed to the specific
individual items of inventory. [IAS 2.23]
For items that are interchangeable, IAS 2 allows the FIFO or weighted average cost formulas.
[IAS 2.25] The LIFO formula, which had been allowed prior to the 2003 revision of IAS 2, is no
longer allowed.
The same cost formula should be used for all inventories with similar characteristics as to their
nature and use to the entity. For groups of inventories that have different characteristics, different
cost formulas may be justified. [IAS 2.25]
NRV is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated cost of
completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. [IAS 2.6] Any write-down to
NRV should be recognized as an expense in the period in which the write-down occurs. Any
reversal should be recognized in the income statement in the period in which the reversal occurs.
[IAS 2.34]
Expense recognition
IAS 18 Revenue addresses revenue recognition for the sale of goods. When inventories are sold
and revenue is recognized, the carrying amount of those inventories is recognized as an expense
(often called cost-of-goods-sold). Any write-down to NRV and any inventory losses are also
recognized as an expense when they occur. [IAS 2.34]
Disclosure
carrying amount of any inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell
amount of any reversal of a write-down to NRV and the circumstances that led to such
reversal
IAS 2 acknowledges that some enterprises classify income statement expenses by nature
(materials, labour, and so on) rather than by function (cost of goods sold, selling expense, and so
on). Accordingly, as an alternative to disclosing cost of goods sold expense, IAS 2 allows an
entity to disclose operating costs recognised during the period by nature of the cost (raw
materials and consumables, labour costs, other operating costs) and the amount of the net change
in inventories for the period). [IAS 2.39] [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
The company (SBL) measured their inventories at lower of cost and net realisable value, after
making due allowances for obsolete and slow moving items. Net realisable value is estimated
selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated cost of completion and selling
expenses. The Company assesses the NRV by giving consideration to future demand and
condition of the inventory and make adjustments to the value by making required provisions.
Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process, goods in transit and finished goods.
Comment:
Hence, for the above discussion it is clear that SBL all the rules and principles laid out by the
standard IAS 2 — Inventories.
Cash flows must be analyzed between operating, investing and financing activities. [IAS 7.10]
Key principles specified by IAS 7 for the preparation of a statement of cash flows are as follows:
operating activities are the main revenue-producing activities of the entity that are not
investing or financing activities, so operating cash flows include cash received from
customers and cash paid to suppliers and employees [IAS 7.14]
investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other
investments that are not considered to be cash equivalents [IAS 7.6]
financing activities are activities that alter the equity capital and borrowing structure of
the entity [IAS 7.6]
interest and dividends received and paid may be classified as operating, investing, or
financing cash flows, provided that they are classified consistently from period to period
[IAS 7.31]
cash flows arising from taxes on income are normally classified as operating, unless they
can be specifically identified with financing or investing activities [IAS 7.35]
for operating cash flows, the direct method of presentation is encouraged, but the indirect
method is acceptable [IAS 7.18]
The direct method shows each major class of gross cash receipts and gross cash
payments.
The operating cash flows section of the statement of cash flows under the direct method would
appear something like this:
The exchange rate used for translation of transactions denominated in a foreign currency should
be the rate in effect at the date of the cash flows [IAS 7.25]
Cash flows of foreign subsidiaries should be translated at the exchange rates prevailing when the
cash flows took place [IAS 7.26]
As regards the cash flows of associates, joint ventures, and subsidiaries, where the equity or cost
method is used, the statement of cash flows should report only cash flows between the investor
and the investee; where proportionate consolidation is used, the cash flow statement should
include the venturer's share of the cash flows of the investee [IAS 7.37]
Aggregate cash flows relating to acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries and other business
units should be presented separately and classified as investing activities, with specified
additional disclosures. [IAS 7.39] The aggregate cash paid or received as consideration should be
reported net of cash and cash equivalents acquired or disposed of [IAS 7.42]
cash flows from investing and financing activities should be reported gross by major class of
cash receipts and major class of cash payments except for the following cases, which may be
reported on a net basis: [IAS 7.22-24]
cash receipts and payments on behalf of customers (for example, receipt and repayment
of demand deposits by banks, and receipts collected on behalf of and paid over to the
owner of a property)
cash receipts and payments for items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are
large, and the maturities are short, generally less than three months (for example, charges
and collections from credit card customers, and purchase and sale of investments)
investing and financing transactions which do not require the use of cash should be excluded
from the statement of cash flows, but they should be separately disclosed elsewhere in the
financial statements [IAS 7.43]
entities shall provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate changes in
liabilities arising from financing activities [IAS 7.44A-44E]*
the components of cash and cash equivalents should be disclosed, and a reconciliation presented
to amounts reported in the statement of financial position [IAS 7.45]
the amount of cash and cash equivalents held by the entity that is not available for use by the
group should be disclosed, together with a commentary by management [IAS 7.48]
The company SBL their Statement of Cash Flows (Cash Flow Statement) is prepared under
direct method in accordance with IAS-7
"Statement of Cash Flows" as required by the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Rules 1987.
In the report
A change of 200 basis points in interest rates for other variable rate liabilities which comprise
the security deposit from employees and shop managers, in 2018 would have increased/
(decreased) equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all
other variables remain constant.
A change of 200 basis points in interest rates for other variable rate liabilities which comprise the
security deposit from employees and shop managers, in 2017 would have increased/ (decreased)
equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other
variables remain constant.
Comment:
Hence, for the above discussion we can see SBL make IAS -7 statements of cash flow under
direct method and also available in their annual report.
Accounting Policies
Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied by
an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
IAS 8 requires an entity to select and apply appropriate accounting policies complying with IFRS
and Interpretations to ensure that the financial statement provide information that is:
the change should be applied retrospectively, with an adjustment to the opening balance
of retained earnings in the statement of changes in equity
comparative information should be restated unless it is impracticable to do so
if the adjustment to opening retained earnings cannot be reasonably determined, the
change should be adjusted prospectively, i.e. included in the current period’s statement of
profit and loss.
the title of the standard or interpretation causing the change the nature of the change in
accounting policy a description of the transitional provisions, including those that might
have an effect on future periods for the current period and each prior period presented, to
the extent practicable, the amount of the adjustment:
for each financial statement line item affected, and for basic and diluted earnings per
share (only if the entity is applying IAS 33)
the amount of the adjustment relating to periods before those presented, to the extent
practicable if retrospective application is impracticable, an explanation and description of
how the change in accounting policy was applied.
the nature of the change in accounting policy the reasons why applying the new
accounting policy provides reliable and more relevant information for the current period
and each prior period presented, to the extent practicable, the amount of the adjustment:
for each financial statement line item affected, and for basic and diluted earnings per
share (only if the entity is applying IAS 33)
the amount of the adjustment relating to periods before those presented, to the extent
practicable if retrospective application is impracticable, an explanation and description of
how the change in accounting policy was applied.
If an entity has not applied a new standard or interpretation that has been issued but is not yet
effective, the entity must disclose that fact and any and known or reasonably estimable
information relevant to assessing the possible impact that the new pronouncement will have in
the year it is applied. [IAS 8.30] [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Comment:
SBL follows IAS 8- Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
IFRS 15 establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much and when
revenue is recognised. It replaced IAS 18 Revenue, IAS 11 Construction Contracts and related
interpretations. Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognised when a customer obtains control of the
goods or services. Determining the timing of the transfer of control – at a point in time or over
time – requires judgment.
The Group has adopted IFRS 15 using the cumulative effect method (without practical
expedients), with the effect of initially applying this standard recognised at the date of initial
application (i.e. 1 January 2018). Accordingly, the information presented for 2017 has not been
restated – i.e. it is presented, as previously reported, under IAS 18, IAS 11 and related
interpretations. Additionally, the disclosure requirements in IFRS 15 have not generally been
applied to comparative information. There was no material impact of adopting IFRS 15 on the
Group’s statement of financial position as at 31 December2018 and its statement of profit or loss
and OCI for the year ended 31 December 2018 and the statement of cash flows for the year then
ended.
IFRS 9 sets out requirements for recognising and measuring financial assets, financial liabilities
and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items. This standard replaces IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. There was no material impact of adopting IFRS 9
on the Group’s statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018 and its statement of profit
or loss and OCI for the year ended 31 December 2018 and the statement of cash flows for the
year then ended.
IFRS 9 contains three principal classification categories for financial assets: measured at
amortized cost, FVOCI and FVTPL. The classification of financial assets under IFRS 9 is
generally based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its contractual
cash flow characteristics. IFRS 9 eliminates the previous IAS 39 categories of held to maturity,
loans and receivables and available for sale. Under IFRS 9, derivatives embedded in contracts
where the host is a financial asset in the scope of the standard are never separated. Instead, the
hybrid financial instrument as a whole is assessed for classification. IFRS 9 largely retains the
existing requirements in IAS 39 for the classification and measurement of financial liabilities.
The adoption of IFRS 9 has not had a significant effect on the Group’s accounting policies
related to financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments (for derivatives that are used as
hedging instruments).
IFRS 16 introduces a single, on-balance sheet lease accounting model for lessees. A lessee
recognises a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and a lease
liability representing its obligation to make lease payments. There are recognition exemptions for
short-term leases and leases of low-value items. Lessor accounting remains similar to the current
standard – i.e. lessors continue to classify leases as finance or operating leases.
IFRS 16 replaces existing leases guidance, including IAS 17 Leases, IFRIC 4 Determining
whether an Arrangement contains a Lease, SIC-15 Operating Leases – Incentives and SIC-27
Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease. The standard is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. Although early adoption is
permitted, the Group has not early adopted IFRS 16 in preparing these financial statements. The
most significant impact identified is that, the Group will recognise new assets and liabilities for
its operating leases of retail stores / showrooms, warehouses, service centers, factories and other
offices facilities. In addition, the nature of expenses related to those leases will now change as
IFRS 16 replaces the straight-line operating lease expense with a depreciation charge for right-
of-use assets and interest expense on lease liabilities. Previously, the Group recognised operating
lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, and recognised liabilities only to
the extent that there was a timing difference between actual lease payments and the expense
recognized.
The Group has no finance leases. As a lessee, the Group plans to apply IFRS 16 initially on 1
January 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Therefore, the cumulative effect of
adopting IFRS 16 will be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings at 1 January 2019, with no restatement of comparative information. The Group also
plans to apply IFRS 16 to all contracts entered into before 1 January 2019 and identified as
leases in accordance with IAS 17 and IFRIC 4.
The Group is currently assessing the impact of initially applying the standard on the elements of
financial statements.
Comment
As the newly applied standards have no material effect on financial statement, in annual report of
SBL not showing the restatement. For adopting IFRS 15, they showed the effect on present
year’s revenue. They currently assessing the impact of the standard that is adopted but still not
effective. So, we can say that annual report 2018 of SBL followed the rules of changing policies
according to the IAS 8.
Accounting Estimates:
An accounting estimates is a method adopted by an entity to arrive at estimated amounts for the
financial statements.
the exercise of judgment based on the latest information available at the time
at a later date, estimates may have to be revised as a result of the availability of new
information, more experience or subsequent developments.
the nature and amount of a change in an accounting estimate that has an effect in the
current period or is expected to have an effect in future periods
if the amount of the effect in future periods is not disclosed because estimating it is
impracticable, an entity shall disclose that fact
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, an entity's financial statements for
one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that
was available and could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in
preparing those statements.
Such errors result from mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies,
oversights or misinterpretations of facts, and fraud.
restating the opening balance of assets, liabilities and equity as if the error had never
occurred, and presenting the necessary adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings in the statement of changes in equity
restating the comparative figures presented, as if the error had never occurred
disclosing within the accounts a statement of financial position at the beginning of the
earliest comparative period. In effect this means that three statements of financial
position will be presented within a set of financial statements:
- at the end of the current year
- at the end of the previous year
- at the beginning of the previous year
the nature of the prior period error for each prior period presented, to the extent
practicable, the amount of the correction:
for each financial statement line item affected, and for basic and diluted earnings per
share (only if the entity is applying IAS 33)
the amount of the correction at the beginning of the earliest prior period presented if
retrospective restatement is impracticable, an explanation and description of how the
error has been corrected.
Financial statements of subsequent periods need not repeat these disclosures. [ CITATION ACC1 \l
18441 ]
Comment:
Singer Bangladesh Limited applied specific accounting policies in their annual report 2018. But
measurements and disclosure for changing the estimations and correction of prior period errors
are not available in the annual report as there so no changes and errors in financial statements.
IAS 10 was reissued in December 2003 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005.
Adjusting event: An event after the reporting period that provides further evidence of conditions
that existed at the end of the reporting period, including an event that indicates that the going
concern assumption in relation to the whole or part of the enterprise is not appropriate. [IAS
10.3]
Non-adjusting event: An event after the reporting period that is indicative of a condition that
arose after the end of the reporting period. [IAS 10.3]
Accounting
Adjust financial statements for adjusting events - events after the balance sheet date that
provide further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period,
including events that indicate that the going concern assumption in relation to the whole
or part of the enterprise is not appropriate. [IAS 10.8]
Do not adjust for non-adjusting events - events or conditions that arose after the end of
the reporting period. [IAS 10.10]
If an entity declares dividends after the reporting period, the entity shall not recognise
those dividends as a liability at the end of the reporting period. That is a non-adjusting
event. [IAS 10.12]
An entity shall not prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis if management
determines after the end of the reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or to
cease trading, or that it has no realistic alternative but to do so. [IAS 10.14]
Disclosure
Non-adjusting events should be disclosed if they are of such importance that non-disclosure
would affect the ability of users to make proper evaluations and decisions. The required
disclosure is (a) the nature of the event and (b) an estimate of its financial effect or a statement
that a reasonable estimate of the effect cannot be made. [IAS 10.21]
A company should update disclosures that relate to conditions that existed at the end of the
reporting period to reflect any new information that it receives after the reporting period about
those conditions. [IAS 10.19]
Companies must disclose the date when the financial statements were authorized for issue and
who gave that authorization. If the enterprise's owners or others have the power to amend the
financial statements after issuance, the enterprise must disclose that fact. [IAS 10.17]
Events after the balance sheet date that provide additional information about the Company's
position at the balance sheet date are reflected in the financial statements. Material events after
the balance sheet date that are not adjusting events are disclosed below:
The board of directors of the company has recommended 30% stock dividend in its 236th
board meeting dated 28 February 2019
The proposed final dividend subsequent to the reporting date was not accounted for in the
financial statements as at 31 December 2018.
The Company has purchased 16.1680% share of International Appliances Limited (IAL)
from Shanghai Sonlu Shangling Enterprise Group Co. Ltd. (9.9978%) and from Sunman
Corporation Limited (6.1702%). Associated call option of Sunman Corporation Limited
has been cancelled. As a result, IAL is now fully owned subsidiary of the Company.
Comment:
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS 10 —Event after the Reporting period.
Accounting
If the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, revenue and costs should be
recognized in proportion to the stage of completion of contract activity. This is known as the
percentage of completion method of accounting. [IAS 11.22]
To be able to estimate the outcome of a contract reliably, the entity must be able to make a
reliable estimate of total contract revenue, the stage of completion, and the costs to complete the
contract. [IAS 11.23-24]
If the outcome cannot be estimated reliably, no profit should be recognised. Instead, contract
revenue should be recognised only to the extent that contract costs incurred are expected to be
recoverable and contract costs should be expensed as incurred. [IAS 11.32]
The stage of completion of a contract can be determined in a variety of ways - including the
proportion that contract costs incurred for work performed to date bear to the estimated total
contract costs, surveys of work performed, or completion of a physical proportion of the contract
work. [IAS 11.30]
Disclosure
Presentation
The gross amount due from customers for contract work should be shown as an asset.
[IAS 11.42]
The gross amount due to customers for contract work should be shown as a liability. [IAS
11.42]
SBL has initially applied IFRS 15 from 1 January 2018 which has replaced the IAS 11
Construction Contracts and related interpretations.
Comments
Hence SBL has adopted new standard IFRS 15, IAS 11- Construction Contracts is not available
in the annual report. Therefore, it is clear that it is not applicable
Current tax for the current and prior periods is recognised as a liability to the extent that it has
not yet been settled, and as an asset to the extent that the amounts already paid exceed the
amount due. The benefit of a tax loss which can be carried back to recover current tax of a prior
period is recognised as an asset.
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered
from) taxation authorities, using the rates/laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted
by the balance sheet date.
Deferred Tax
Deferred tax is an accounting adjustment aimed to match the tax effects of transaction to the
relevant accounting period.
The figure for tax on profits is an estimate of the amount that will be eventually paid (or
received) and will appear in current liabilities (or assets) in the statement of financial position.
Therefore, the balance on the statement of the financial position for taxation will be only the
current year’s provision.
Calculation of Deferred Taxes:
Formulas:
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities can be calculated using the following formulas:
The following formula can be used in the calculation of deferred taxes arising from unused tax
losses or unused tax credits:
Deferred tax asset = Unused tax loss or unused tax credits x Tax rate
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the
period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates/laws that have been
enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. [IAS 12.47] The
measurement reflects the entity's expectations, at the end of the reporting period, as to the
manner in which the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities will be recovered or settled.
Where the tax rate or tax base is impacted by the manner in which the entity recovers its
assets or settles its liabilities (e.g. whether an asset is sold or used), the measurement of
deferred taxes is consistent with the way in which an asset is recovered or liability settled
[IAS 12.51A]
Where deferred taxes arise from revalued non-depreciable assets (e.g. revalued land),
deferred taxes reflect the tax consequences of selling the asset [IAS 12.51B]
Deferred taxes arising from investment property measured at fair value under IAS
40 Investment Property reflect the rebuttable presumption that the investment property
will be recovered through sale
If dividends are paid to shareholders, and this causes income taxes to be payable at a
higher or lower rate, or the entity pays additional taxes or receives a refund, deferred
taxes are measured using the tax rate applicable to undistributed profits
The following formula summarizes the amount of tax to be recognized in an accounting period:
Tax to recognize for the period= Current tax for the period + Movement in deferred tax balances
for the period
Consistent with the principles underlying IAS 12, the tax consequences of transactions and other
events are recognized in the same way as the items giving rise to those tax consequences.
Accordingly, current and deferred tax is recognized as income or expense and included in profit
or loss for the period, except to the extent that the tax arises from:
transactions or events that are recognized outside of profit or loss (other comprehensive
income or equity) - in which case the related tax amount is also recognized outside of
profit or loss
a business combination - in which case the tax amounts are recognized as identifiable
assets or liabilities at the acquisition date, and accordingly effectively taken into account
in the determination of goodwill when applying IFRS 3 Business Combinations.
IAS 12 provides the following additional guidance on the recognition of income tax for the
period:
Where it is difficult to determine the amount of current and deferred tax relating to
items recognized outside of profit or loss (e.g. where there are graduated rates or tax),
the amount of income tax recognized outside of profit or loss is determined on a
reasonable pro-rata allocation, or using another more appropriate method
In the circumstances where the payment of dividends impacts the tax rate or results in
taxable amounts or refunds, the income tax consequences of dividends are considered
to be more directly linked to past transactions or events and so are recognized in
profit or loss unless the past transactions or events were recognized outside of profit
or loss
The impact of business combinations on the recognition of pre-combination deferred
tax assets are not included in the determination of goodwill as part of the business
combination, but are separately recognized
The recognition of acquired deferred tax benefits subsequent to a business
combination are treated as 'measurement period' adjustments if they qualify for that
treatment, or otherwise are recognized in profit or loss
Tax benefits of equity settled share based payment transactions that exceed the tax
effected cumulative remuneration expense are considered to relate to an equity item
and are recognized directly in equity.
Presentation
Current tax assets and current tax liabilities can only be offset in the statement of financial
position if the entity has the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities can only be offset in the statement of financial
position if the entity has the legal right to settle current tax amounts on a net basis and the
deferred tax amounts are levied by the same taxing authority on the same entity or different
entities that intend to realise the asset and settle the liability at the same time.
The amount of tax expense (or income) related to profit or loss is required to be presented in the
statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
The tax effects of items included in other comprehensive income can either be shown net for
each item, or the items can be shown before tax effects with an aggregate amount of income tax
for groups of items (allocated between items that will and will not be reclassified to profit or loss
in subsequent periods).
Disclosure
- amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to the origination and reversal
of temporary differences
- amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to changes in tax rates or the
imposition of new taxes
- amount of the benefit arising from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit
or temporary difference of a prior period
- aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items recognised directly in equity
- explanation of the relationship between tax expense (income) and the tax that would be
expected by applying the current tax rate to accounting profit or loss (this can be
presented as a reconciliation of amounts of tax or a reconciliation of the rate of tax)
- amounts and other details of deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses, and
unused tax credits
- temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches and
associates, and interests in joint arrangements
- for each type of temporary difference and unused tax loss and credit, the amount of
deferred tax assets or liabilities recognized in the statement of financial position and the
amount of deferred tax income or expense recognized in profit or loss
- tax consequences of dividends declared after the end of the reporting period
In addition to the disclosures required by IAS 12, some disclosures relating to income taxes are
required by IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, as follows:
- Disclosure on the face of the statement of financial position about current tax assets,
current tax liabilities, deferred tax assets, and deferred tax liabilities
- Disclosure of tax expense (tax income) in the profit or loss section of the statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income (or separate statement if presented)
[ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
In the note number 18 of the notes and disclosure, SBL showed their advance income tax,
provision for income tax of 2018. As well as, they showed their income tax expense of 2018 in
note number 26. All the accounting treatment was done according to the IAS 12.
In note number 40(D) they stated that,
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in the
statement of comprehensive income (profit and loss statement).
Current tax
The Company qualifies as a “Publicly Traded Company”, as defined in income tax law. The
applicable tax rate for the Company is 25%. Provision for taxation has been made on this basis
which is compliant with the Finance Act 2018. [ CITATION Sng \l 18441 ]
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet method, providing for temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to
be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been
enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they
relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity. The deferred
tax asset/income or liability/expense does not create a legal obligation to, or recoverability from,
the income tax authority.
A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will
be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax
assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer
probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. [ CITATION Sng \l 18441 ]
Comment:
IAS 14 was issued in August 1997, was applicable to annual periods beginning on or after 1 July
1998, and was superseded by IFRS 8 Operating Segments with effect from annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009.
Applicability
IAS 14 must be applied by entities whose debt or equity securities are publicly traded and those
in the process of issuing such securities in public securities markets. [IAS 14.3]
If an entity that is not publicly traded chooses to report segment information and claims that its
financial statements conform to IFRSs, then it must follow IAS 14 in full. [IAS 14.5]
Segment information need not be presented in the separate financial statements of a (a) parent,
(b) subsidiary, (c) equity method associate, or (d) equity method joint venture that are presented
in the same report as the consolidated statements. [IAS 14.6-7]
IAS 14 has detailed guidance as to which items of revenue and expense are included in segment
revenue and segment expense. All companies will report a standardized measure of segment
result – basically operating profit before interest, taxes, and head office expenses. For an entity's
primary segments, revised IAS 14 requires disclosure of: [IAS 14.51-67]
Sales revenue (distinguishing between external and intersegment) result assets the basis of
intersegment pricing liabilities capital additions depreciation and amortization significant
unusual items non-cash expenses other than depreciation equity method income
Segment revenue includes "sales" from one segment to another. Under IAS 14, these
intersegment transfers must be measured on the basis that the entity actually used to price the
transfers. [IAS 14.75]
In the annual report of Singer Company, we have found the following things regarding IAS 14:
Segment reporting. Segment reporting is not applicable for the Company this year as the
Company does not meet the criteria required for segment reporting specified in IFRS 8:
"Operating Segments”. The details are described on note no. 2.5.
Comment:
Therefore, we can say that the company does not follow the rules and regulations as prescribed
by IAS 14.
IAS 16 was reissued in December 2003 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005.
Initial measurement
An item of property, plant and equipment should initially be recorded at cost. [IAS 16.15] Cost
includes all costs necessary to bring the asset to working condition for its intended use. This
would include not only its original purchase price but also costs of site preparation, delivery and
handling, installation, related professional fees for architects and engineers, and the estimated
cost of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the site (see IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets). [IAS 16.16-17]
If payment for an item of property, plant, and equipment is deferred, interest at a market rate
must be recognised or imputed. [IAS 16.23]
If an asset is acquired in exchange for another asset (whether similar or dissimilar in nature), the
cost will be measured at the fair value unless (a) the exchange transaction lacks commercial
substance or (b) the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably
measurable. If the acquired item is not measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset given up. [IAS 16.24]
Cost model: The asset is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. [IAS
16.30]
Revaluation model: The asset is carried at a revalued amount, being its fair value at the date of
revaluation less subsequent depreciation and impairment, provided that fair value can be
measured reliably. [IAS 16.31]
The revaluation model: Under the revaluation model, revaluations should be carried out
regularly, so that the carrying amount of an asset does not differ materially from its fair value at
the balance sheet date. [IAS 16.31]
If an item is revalued, the entire class of assets to which that asset belongs should be revalued.
[IAS 16.36]
Revalued assets are depreciated in the same way as under the cost model (see below).
The depreciable amount (cost less residual value) should be allocated on a systematic basis over
the asset's useful life [IAS 16.50].
The residual value and the useful life of an asset should be reviewed at least at each financial
year-end and, if expectations differ from previous estimates, any change is accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate under IAS 8. [IAS 16.51]
The depreciation method used should reflect the pattern in which the asset's economic benefits
are consumed by the entity [IAS 16.60]; a depreciation method that is based on revenue that is
generated by an activity that includes the use of an asset is not appropriate. [IAS 16.62A]
Note: The clarification regarding the revenue-based depreciation method was introduced
by Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation, which applies to
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016.
The depreciation method should be reviewed at least annually and, if the pattern of consumption
of benefits has changed, the depreciation method should be changed prospectively as a change in
estimate under IAS 8. [IAS 16.61] Expected future reductions in selling prices could be
indicative of a higher rate of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in an asset.
[IAS 16.56]
Note: The guidance on expected future reductions in selling prices was introduced
by Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation, which applies to
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016.
Depreciation should be charged to profit or loss, unless it is included in the carrying amount of
another asset [IAS 16.48].
Depreciation begins when the asset is available for use and continues until the asset is
derecognised, even if it is idle. [IAS 16.55]
Any claim for compensation from third parties for impairment is included in profit or loss when
the claim becomes receivable. [IAS 16.65]
An asset should be removed from the statement of financial position on disposal or when it is
withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The gain or
loss on disposal is the difference between the proceeds and the carrying amount and should be
recognised in profit and loss. [IAS 16.67-71]
If an entity rents some assets and then ceases to rent them, the assets should be transferred to
inventories at their carrying amounts as they become held for sale in the ordinary course of
business. [IAS 16.68A]
Disclosure
For each class of property, plant, and equipment, disclose: [IAS 16.73]
Additional disclosures
IAS 16 also encourages, but does not require, a number of additional disclosures. [IAS 16.79]
If property, plant, and equipment is stated at revalued amounts, certain additional disclosures are
required: [IAS 16.77]
Entities with property, plant and equipment stated at revalued amounts are also required to make
disclosures under IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Use of the respective standard in SBL annual Report
During the year under review, SBL invested a sum of Tk 167 million in property, plant and
equipment. Movement in property, plant and equipment during the year is disclosed under note 3
and annexure-I of the financial statements
Property, plant and equipment are stated in attached statement of financial position are measured
at cost/fair value less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses in
accordance with IAS-16 "Property Plant and Equipment". Maintenance, renewals and
betterments that enhance the economic useful life of the property, plant and equipment or that
improve the capacity, quality or reduce substantially the operating cost or administration
expenses are capitalised by adding it to the related property, plant and equipment.
If significant parts of an item of property, plant & equipment have different useful lives, then
they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant & equipment.
Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property, plant & equipment is recognised in profit or
loss.
Cost model: The Company applies cost model to property, plant & equipment except for land
and buildings.
Revaluation model: The company applies revaluation model to entire class of freehold land and
buildings. A revaluation is carried out when there is a substantial difference between the fair
value and the carrying amount of the property and is undertaken by professionally qualified
valuers. The company reviews its assets when deemed appropriate considering reasonable
interval of years/time.
Increase in the carrying amount on revaluation is recognised in other comprehensive income and
accumulated in equity in the revaluation reserve unless it reverses a previous revaluation
decrease relating to the same asset, which was previously recognised as an expense. In these
circumstances the increase is recognised as income to the extent of the previous write down.
Decrease in the carrying amount on revaluation that offset previous increases of the same
individual assets are charged against revaluation reserve directly in equity. All other decreases
are recognised in profit and loss.
Subsequent costs: The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is
recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits
embodied within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The
costs of the day-to-day maintenance of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the profit
and loss account as incurred.
Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is charged on property plant and equipment from the
month of acquisition and no depreciation is charged in the month of disposal.
Depreciation is charged at the rates varying from 2.5% to 25% depending on the estimated useful
lives of assets. No depreciation is charged for work-in-progress. The rates of depreciation of
SBL, applied on reducing balance method, for the current and comparative years are as follows:
Comment:
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS 16 —Property, Plant and Equipment
IAS 17 — Leases
IAS 17 Leases prescribes the accounting policies and disclosures applicable to leases, both for
lessees and lessors. Leases are required to be classified as either finance leases (which transfer
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, and give rise to asset and liability
recognition by the lessee and a receivable by the lessor) and operating leases (which result in
expense recognition by the lessee, with the asset remaining recognised by the lessor).
IAS 17 was reissued in December 2003 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005. IAS 17 will be superseded by IFRS 16 Leases as of 1 January 2019.
Accounting by lessees
at commencement of the lease term, finance leases should be recorded as an asset and a
liability at the lower of the fair value of the asset and the present value of the minimum
lease payments (discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, if practicable, or else
at the entity's incremental borrowing rate) [IAS 17.20]
finance lease payments should be apportioned between the finance charge and the
reduction of the outstanding liability (the finance charge to be allocated so as to produce
a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability) [IAS 17.25]
the depreciation policy for assets held under finance leases should be consistent with that
for owned assets. If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership
at the end of the lease – the asset should be depreciated over the shorter of the lease term
or the life of the asset [IAS 17.27]
for operating leases, the lease payments should be recognised as an expense in the
income statement over the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic
basis is more representative of the time pattern of the user's benefit [IAS 17.33]
Incentives for the agreement of a new or renewed operating lease should be recognised by the
lessee as a reduction of the rental expense over the lease term, irrespective of the incentive's
nature or form, or the timing of payments. [SIC-15]
Accounting by lessors
at commencement of the lease term, the lessor should record a finance lease in the
balance sheet as a receivable, at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease [IAS
17.36]
the lessor should recognise finance income based on a pattern reflecting a constant
periodic rate of return on the lessor's net investment outstanding in respect of the finance
lease [IAS 17.39]
assets held for operating leases should be presented in the balance sheet of the lessor
according to the nature of the asset. [IAS 17.49] Lease income should be recognised over
the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is more
representative of the time pattern in which use benefit is derived from the leased asset is
diminished [IAS 17.50]
Incentives for the agreement of a new or renewed operating lease should be recognised by the
lessor as a reduction of the rental income over the lease term, irrespective of the incentive's
nature or form, or the timing of payments. [SIC-15]
Manufacturers or dealer lessors should include selling profit or loss in the same period as they
would for an outright sale. If artificially low rates of interest are charged, selling profit should be
restricted to that which would apply if a commercial rate of interest were charged. [IAS 17.42]
Under the 2003 revisions to IAS 17, initial direct and incremental costs incurred by lessors in
negotiating leases must be recognised over the lease term. They may no longer be charged to
expense when incurred. This treatment does not apply to manufacturer or dealer lessors where
such cost recognition is as an expense when the selling profit is recognised.
For a sale and leaseback transaction that results in a finance lease, any excess of proceeds over
the carrying amount is deferred and amortised over the lease term. [IAS 17.59]
reconciliation between gross investment in the lease and the present value of minimum
lease payments;
gross investment and present value of minimum lease payments receivable for:
the next year
years 2 through 5 combined
beyond five years
unearned finance income
unguaranteed residual values
accumulated allowance for uncollectible lease payments receivable
contingent rent recognised in income
general description of significant leasing arrangements
As IAS 17 has been superseded by IFRS 16 Leases as of 1 January 2019, SBL follows IFRS 16.
Therefore information about IAS 17 is not available in the annual report of SBL.
COMMENT
There is no information about IAS 17 - Lease in SBL annual report. Therefore, it is clear that it is
not applicable.
IAS 18 – Revenue
Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits (cash, receivables, other assets) arising from
the ordinary operating activities of an entity (such as sales of goods, sales of services, interest,
royalties, and dividends).
Recognition of Revenue
Recognition, as defined in the IASB Framework, means incorporating an item that meets the
definition of revenue (above) in the income statement when it meets the following criteria:
it is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item of revenue will
flow to the entity, and
1. Sale of goods
2. Rendering of services
3. Interest, royalties, and dividends
Measurement of Revenue
Revenue should be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. An
exchange for goods or services of a similar nature and value is not regarded as a transaction that
generates revenue. However, exchanges for dissimilar items are regarded as generating revenue.
If the inflow of cash or cash equivalents is deferred, the fair value of the consideration receivable
is less than the nominal amount of cash and cash equivalents to be received, and discounting is
appropriate. This would occur, for instance, if the seller is providing interest-free credit to the
buyer or is charging a below-market rate of interest. Interest must be imputed based on market
rates. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Use of the Respective Standard in SBL Annual Report
Comment:
From 2018, SBL is following IFRS 18, instead of IAS 18. Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognised
when a customer obtains control of the goods or services.
Measurement
The measurement of a net defined benefit liability or assets requires the application of an
actuarial valuation method, the attribution of benefits to periods of service, and the use of
actuarial assumptions. [IAS 19(2011).66] The fair value of any plan assets is deducted from the
present value of the defined benefit obligation in determining the net deficit or surplus. [IAS
19(2011).113]
The determination of the net defined benefit liability (or asset) is carried out with sufficient
regularity such that the amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially
from those that would be determined at end of the reporting period. [IAS 19(2011).58]
The present value of an entity's defined benefit obligations and related service costs is
determined using the 'projected unit credit method', which sees each period of service as giving
rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately in building up
the final obligation. [IAS 19(2011).67-68] This requires an entity to attribute benefit to the
current period (to determine current service cost) and the current and prior periods (to determine
the present value of defined benefit obligations). Benefit is attributed to periods of service using
the plan's benefit formula, unless an employee's service in later years will lead to a materially
higher of benefit than in earlier years, in which case a straight-line basis is used [IAS
19(2011).70]
The overall actuarial assumptions used must be unbiased and mutually compatible, and represent
the best estimate of the variables determining the ultimate post-employment benefit cost. [IAS
19(2011).75-76]:
Past service cost is the term used to describe the change in a defined benefit obligation for
employee service in prior periods, arising as a result of changes to plan arrangements in the
current period (i.e. plan amendments introducing or changing benefits payable, or curtailments
which significantly reduce the number of covered employees).
Past service cost may be either positive (where benefits are introduced or improved) or negative
(where existing benefits are reduced). Past service cost is recognised as an expense at the earlier
of the date when a plan amendment or curtailment occurs and the date when an entity recognises
any termination benefits, or related restructuring costs under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets. [IAS 19(2011).103]
Gains or losses on the settlement of a defined benefit plan are recognised when the settlement
occurs. [IAS 19(2011).110]
Before past service costs are determined, or a gain or loss on settlement is recognised, the net
defined benefit liability or asset is required to be remeasured, however an entity is not required to
distinguish between past service costs resulting from curtailments and gains and losses on
settlement where these transactions occur together. [IAS 19(2011).99-100]
Component Recognition
Profit or loss
Service cost attributable to the current and
past periods
Net interest on the net defined benefit Profit or loss
liability or asset, determined using the
discount rate at the beginning of the period
Other comprehensive income
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit (Not reclassified to profit or loss in a
liability or asset, comprising: subsequent period)
actuarial gains and losses
return on plan assets
some changes in the effect of the
asset ceiling
Other guidance
IAS 19(2011) sets the following disclosure objectives in relation to defined benefit plans [IAS
19(2011).135]:
Extensive specific disclosures in relation to meeting each the above objectives are specified, e.g.
a reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance of the net defined benefit
liability or asset, disaggregation of the fair value of plan assets into classes, and sensitivity
analysis of each significant actuarial assumption. [IAS 19(2011).136-147]
Additional disclosures are required in relation to multi-employer plans and defined benefit plans
sharing risk between entities under common control. [IAS 19(2011).148-150].
IAS 19 (2011) prescribes a modified application of the post-employment benefit model described
above for other long-term employee benefits: [IAS 19(2011).153-154]
Termination benefits
A termination benefit liability is recognised at the earlier of the following dates: [IAS
19.165-168]
when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits - additional
guidance is provided on when this date occurs in relation to an employee's decision to
accept an offer of benefits on termination, and as a result of an entity's decision to
terminate an employee's employment
when the entity recognises costs for a restructuring under IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets which involves the payment of
termination benefits.
Termination benefits are measured in accordance with the nature of employee benefit, i.e. as an
enhancement of other post-employment benefits, or otherwise as a short-term employee benefit
or other long-term employee benefit. [IAS 19(2011).169] [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
The Company maintains both defined contribution plan (provident fund) and a retirement benefit
obligation (gratuity fund) for its eligible permanent employees.
It is a post-employment benefit plan under which the Company provides benefits for all of its
permanent employees. The recognized Employees' Provident Fund is being considered as
defined contribution plan as it meets the recognition criteria specified for this purpose. All
permanent employees contribute 12.5% of their basic salary to the provident fund and the
Company also makes equal contribution. This fund is recognized by the National Board of
Revenue (NBR), under the First Schedule, Part B of Income Tax Ordinance 1984. The Company
recognizes contribution to defined contribution plan as an expense when an employee has
rendered required services. The legal and constructive obligation is limited to the amount it
agrees to contribute to the fund. Obligations are created when they are due.
The Company operates a funded gratuity scheme for its permanent employees, under which an
employee is entitled to the benefits depending on the length of services and last drawn basic
salary. Projected Unit Credit method is used to measure the present value of defined benefit
obligations and related current and past service cost and mutually compatible actuarial
assumptions about demographic and financial variables are used.
This relates to leave encashment and is measured on an undiscounted basis and expensed as the
related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid if the
Company has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past
service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably. Accordingly,
necessary provision is made for the amount of annual leave encashment based on the latest basic
salary. This benefit is applicable for employees as per service rules
Comment:
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS 19 —Employee Benefit Plan (2011).
A government grant is recognized only when there is reasonable assurance that (a) the entity will
comply with any conditions attached to the grant and (b) the grant will be received. [IAS 20.7]
The grant is recognized as income over the period necessary to match them with the related
costs, for which they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis. [IAS 20.12]
Non-monetary grants, such as land or other resources, are usually accounted for at fair value,
although recording both the asset and the grant at a nominal amount is also permitted. [IAS
20.23]
Even if there are no conditions attached to the assistance specifically relating to the operating
activities of the entity (other than the requirement to operate in certain regions or industry
sectors), such grants should not be credited to equity.
A grant receivable as compensation for costs already incurred or for immediate financial support,
with no future related costs, should be recognized as income in the period in which it is
receivable. [IAS 20.20]
A grant relating to assets may be presented in one of two ways: [IAS 20.24]
as deferred income, or by deducting the grant from the asset's carrying amount.
A grant relating to income may be reported separately as 'other income' or deducted from
the related expense. [IAS 20.29]
If a grant becomes repayable, it should be treated as a change in estimate. Where the original
grant related to income, the repayment should be applied first against any related unamortised
deferred credit, and any excess should be dealt with as an expense. Where the original grant
related to an asset, the repayment should be treated as increasing the carrying amount of the asset
or reducing the deferred income balance. The cumulative depreciation which would have been
charged had the grant not been received should be charged as an expense. [IAS 20.32]
accounting policy adopted for grants, including method of balance sheet presentation nature and
extent of grants recognized in the financial statements unfulfilled conditions and contingencies
attaching to recognized grants.
Government assistance
Government grants do not include government assistance whose value cannot be reasonably
measured, such as technical or marketing advice. [IAS 20.34] Disclosure of the benefits is
required. [IAS 20.39(b)]
Comment
There is no information about IAS 20 — Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of
Government Assistance in SBL annual report. Therefore, it is clear that it is not applicable.
Disclosure
When an entity presents its financial statements in a currency that is different from its functional
currency, it may describe those financial statements as complying with IFRS only if they comply
with all the requirements of each applicable Standard (including IAS 21) and each applicable
Interpretation. [IAS 21.55]
Convenience translations
Sometimes, an entity displays its financial statements or other financial information in a currency
that is different from either its functional currency or its presentation currency simply by
translating all amounts at end-of-period exchange rates. This is sometimes called a convenience
translation. A result of making a convenience translation is that the resulting financial
information does not comply with all IFRS, particularly IAS 21. In this case, the following
disclosures are required: [IAS 21.57]
Foreign currency transactions are recorded in BDT at applicable rates of exchange ruling at the
dates of transactions in accordance with IAS-21 "The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange
Rates." Exchange rate difference at the statement of financial position date are charged/credited
to statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, to the extent that this treatment
does not contradict with the Schedule XI of Companies Act 1994. This Schedule requires all
exchange gains and losses arising from foreign currency borrowings, taken to finance acquisition
of construction of fixed assets, to be credited/ charged to the cost/value of such assets.
Comment
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS-21 "The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.
IAS 23- Borrowing Costs
Recognition
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a
qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset and, therefore, should be capitalised. Other
borrowing costs are recognised as an expense. [IAS 23.8]
Measurement
Where funds are borrowed specifically, costs eligible for capitalisation are the actual
costs incurred less any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.
[IAS 23.12]
Where funds are part of a general pool, the eligible amount is determined by applying a
capitalisation rate to the expenditure on that asset. The capitalisation rate will be the
weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the general pool. [IAS 23.14]
substantially all of the activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale
are complete. If only minor modifications are outstanding, this indicates that substantially
all of the activities are complete.
construction is suspended, e.g. due to industrial disputes
Disclosure
Comment:
IAS 23 is not available in annual report of Singer Bangladesh Limited as the company has no
borrowing cost to capitalise.
Disclosure
Relationships between parents and subsidiaries. Regardless of whether there have been
transactions between a parent and a subsidiary, an entity must disclose the name of its parent
and, if different, the ultimate controlling party. If neither the entity's parent nor the ultimate
controlling party produces financial statements available for public use, the name of the next
most senior parent that does so must also be disclosed. [IAS 24.16]
Management compensation. Disclose key management personnel compensation in total and for
each of the following categories: [IAS 24.17]
post-employment benefits
termination benefits
If an entity obtains key management personnel services from a management entity, the entity is
not required to disclose the compensation paid or payable by the management entity to the
management entity’s employees or directors. Instead the entity discloses the amounts incurred by
the entity for the provision of key management personnel services that are provided by the
separate management entity*. [IAS 24.17A, 18A]
Related party transactions. If there have been transactions between related parties, disclose the
nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and
outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on
the financial statements. These disclosures would be made separately for each category of related
parties and would include: [IAS 24.18-19]
the amount of outstanding balances, including terms and conditions and guarantees
expense recognised during the period in respect of bad or doubtful debts due from related
parties
Examples of the kinds of transactions that are disclosed if they are with a related party
leases
transfers of research and development
transfers under finance arrangements (including loans and equity contributions in cash or
in kind)
commitments to do something if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future,
including executory contracts (recognised and unrecognised)
settlement of liabilities on behalf of the entity or by the entity on behalf of another party
A statement that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in
arm's length transactions should be made only if such terms can be substantiated. [IAS 24.21]
[ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Information about IAS 24 — Related Party disclouser in SBL annual report is not available
Comment:
IAS 24 is not available in annual report of Singer Bangladesh Limited as the company did not do
any related parties disclosure.
Disclosure
Statement of changes in net assets available for benefits, showing: [IAS 26.35(b)]
employer contributions
employee contributions
investment income
other income
benefits paid
administrative expenses
other expenses
income taxes
profit or loss on disposal of investments
changes in fair value of investments
transfers to/from other plans
Description of the plan and of the effect of any changes in the plan during the period [IAS
26.34(c)]
Information about IAS 26 — Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans in SBL
annual report is not available. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Comment:
There is no information about the standard IAS 26 — Accounting and Reporting by Retirement
Benefit Plans. Therefore, it is clear that it is not applicable.
IAS 28 was reissued in May 2011 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2013.
Disclosure
There are no disclosures specified in IAS 28. Instead, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities outlines the disclosures required for entities with joint control of, or significant influence
over, an investee.
In the annual report of Singer Company, we have found the following things regarding IAS 28:
Investment in associate
An associate is an entity over which the investor has significant influence. Significant influence is
the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee, but is not
control or joint control over those policies. Investment in associate is accounted for using the
equity method. Under the equity method, the investment in an associate is initially recognized at
cost. The carrying amount of the investment is adjusted to recognize changes in the investor's
share of net assets of the associate since the acquisition date. The statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income reflects the investor's share of the results of operations of the
associate. Any change in other comprehensive income of the investee is presented as part of the
investor's other comprehensive income. In addition, when there has been a change recognized
directly in the equity of the associate, the investor recognizes its share of any changes, when
applicable, in the statement of changes in equity. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from
transactions between the investor and the associate are eliminated to the extent of the interest in
the associate. Investment in term deposit This represents investment in term deposit with
Commercial Bank of Ceylon which is renewable. Investment in short term deposit Investment in
short term deposit represents fixed deposit with maturity of three months and over.
Comment:
So, we can say that the company follows the rules and regulations as prescribed by IAS 28.
Disclosure
Gain or loss on monetary items [IAS 29.9] The fact that financial statements and other prior
period data have been restated for changes in the general purchasing power of the reporting
currency [IAS 29.39] Whether the financial statements are based on an historical cost or current
cost approach [IAS 29.39] Identity and level of the price index at the balance sheet date and
moves during the current and previous reporting period [IAS 29.39]
Use of the Respective Standard in SBL Annual Report
Since Bangladesh does not fall in the jurisdictions as per hyperinflationary category, so the rules
and regulations as per IAS 29 is not applicable for Singer Company
Comment:
So, we can say that the company does not follow the rules and regulations as prescribed by IAS
29.
IAS 31 was reissued in December 2003, applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005, and is superseded by IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities with effect from annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.
Disclosure
Information about contingent liabilities relating to its interest in a joint venture. [IAS
31.54]
Information about commitments relating to its interests in joint ventures. [IAS 31.55]
A listing and description of interests in significant joint ventures and the proportion of
ownership interest held in jointly controlled entities. A venturer that recognises its
interests in jointly controlled entities using the line-by-line reporting format for
proportionate consolidation or the equity method shall disclose the aggregate amounts of
each of current assets, long-term assets, current liabilities, long-term liabilities, income,
and expenses related to its interests in joint ventures. [IAS 31.56]
The method it uses to recognise its interests in jointly controlled entities. [IAS 31.57]
Venture capital organisations or mutual funds that account for their interests in jointly
controlled entities in accordance with IAS 39 must make the disclosures required by IAS
31.55-56. [IAS 31.1]
Information about IAS 31 — Interests in Joint Ventures in SBL annual report is not available.
Comment
There is no information about IAS 31 — Interests in Joint Ventures in SBL annual report.
Therefore, it is clear that it is not applicable.
Disclosures
The disclosures relating to treasury shares are in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and
IAS 24 Related Parties for share repurchases from related parties. [IAS 32.34 and 39]
Similar to IAS 29, IAS 32 has yet not been applied in our companies. Therefore, the company
doesn’t apply its rules and regulations.
Comment:
So ,we can say that the company does not follow the rules and regulations as prescribed by IAS
32.
IAS 33 - Earnings Per Share
IAS 33 Earnings per share sets out how to calculate both basic earnings per share (EPS) and
diluted EPS.
An entity whose securities are publicly traded (or that is in process of public issuance) must
present, on the face of the statement of comprehensive income, basic and diluted EPS for: [IAS
33.66]
profit or loss from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the
parent entity; and
profit or loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the parent entity for the period
for each class of ordinary shares that has a different right to share in profit for the period.
If an entity presents the components of profit or loss in a separate income statement, it presents
EPS only in that separate statement.
Basic and diluted EPS must be presented with equal prominence for all periods presented
Basic and diluted EPS must be presented even if the amounts are negative (that is, a loss per
share).
If an entity reports a discontinued operation, basic and diluted amounts per share must be
disclosed for the discontinued operation either on the face of the of comprehensive income (or
separate income statement if presented) or in the notes to the financial statements.
Basic EPS
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
parent entity (the numerator) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
(the denominator) during the period.
The earnings numerators (profit or loss from continuing operations and net profit or loss) used
for the calculation should be after deducting all expenses including taxes, minority interests, and
preference dividends.
The denominator (number of shares) is calculated by adjusting the shares in issue at the
beginning of the period by the number of shares bought back or issued during the period,
multiplied by a time-weighting factor. IAS 33 includes guidance on appropriate recognition dates
for shares issued in various circumstances.
Contingently issuable shares are included in the basic EPS denominator when the contingency
has been met.
Diluted EPS
Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the earnings and number of shares for the effects of
dilutive options and other dilutive potential ordinary shares. The effects of anti-dilutive potential
ordinary shares are ignored in calculating diluted EPS. Guidance on calculating dilution are
given below-
Retrospective Adjustments
The calculation of basic and diluted EPS for all periods presented is adjusted retrospectively
when the number of ordinary or potential ordinary shares outstanding increases as a result of a
capitalization, bonus issue, or share split, or decreases as a result of a reverse share split. If such
changes occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are authorized for
issue, the EPS calculations for those and any prior period financial statements presented are
based on the new number of shares. Disclosure is required.
Basic and diluted EPS are also adjusted for the effects of errors and adjustments resulting from
changes in accounting policies, accounted for retrospectively.
Diluted EPS for prior periods should not be adjusted for changes in the assumptions used or for
the conversion of potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares outstanding.
Disclosure
- the amounts used as the numerators in calculating basic and diluted EPS, and a
reconciliation of those amounts to profit or loss attributable to the parent entity for the
period
- the weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating
basic and diluted EPS, and a reconciliation of these denominators to each other
- instruments (including contingently issuable shares) that could potentially dilute basic
EPS in the future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because they
are antidilutive for the period(s) presented
- a description of those ordinary share transactions or potential ordinary share transactions
that occur after the balance sheet date and that would have changed significantly the
number of ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares outstanding at the end of the
period if those transactions had occurred before the end of the reporting period. Examples
include issues and redemptions of ordinary shares issued for cash, warrants and options,
conversions, and exercises [IAS 34.71]
An entity is permitted to disclose amounts per share other than profit or loss from continuing
operations, discontinued operations, and net profit or loss earnings per share. Guidance for
calculating and presenting such amounts is included in IAS 33.73 and 73A.
In 2018, SBL’s profit after tax was 900,153,413 and EPS was 11.74 (statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income).
In note number 10 they have given the detailed information about their share.
Authorized:
100,000,000 ordinary shares of Taka 10 each 1,000,000,000
So, total Issued, subscribed and paid up share no. is (25,670+ 102,580+ 76,566,241) 76,694,491.
Basic EPS= 900,153,413/ 76,694,491= 11.74, they showed this calculation on note number 31.1
and in 31.2 they said that here was no potentially dilutive potential ordinary shares in 2018.
The Company presents basic and diluted (when dilution is applicable) earnings per share (EPS)
data for its ordinary shares.
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the
Company by weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period,
adjusted for the effect of change in number of shares for bonus issue, share split and reserve
split.
Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders
and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, for the effects of all dilutive
potential ordinary shares. However, dilution of EPS is not applicable for these financial
statements as there was no dilutive potential ordinary shares during the relevant periods.
Comment:
SBL following IAS 33 for in recognition, measurement and disclosure of earning per share.
Note disclosures
The explanatory notes required are designed to provide an explanation of events and transactions
that are significant to an understanding of the changes in financial position and performance of
the entity since the last annual reporting date. IAS 34 states a presumption that anyone who reads
an entity's interim report will also have access to its most recent annual report. Consequently,
IAS 34 avoids repeating annual disclosures in interim condensed reports. [IAS 34.15]
Accounting policies
The same accounting policies should be applied for interim reporting as are applied in the entity's
annual financial statements, except for accounting policy changes made after the date of the most
recent annual financial statements that are to be reflected in the next annual financial statements.
[IAS 34.28]
A key provision of IAS 34 is that an entity should use the same accounting policy throughout a
single financial year. If a decision is made to change a policy mid-year, the change is
implemented retrospectively, and previously reported interim data is restated. [IAS 34.43]
Measurement
Measurements for interim reporting purposes should be made on a year-to-date basis, so that the
frequency of the entity's reporting does not affect the measurement of its annual results. [IAS
34.28]
Revenues that are received seasonally, cyclically or occasionally within a financial year
should not be anticipated or deferred as of the interim date, if anticipation or deferral
would not be appropriate at the end of the financial year. [IAS 34.37]
Costs that are incurred unevenly during a financial year should be anticipated or deferred
for interim reporting purposes if, and only if, it is also appropriate to anticipate or defer
that type of cost at the end of the financial year. [IAS 34.39]
Income tax expense should be recognised based on the best estimate of the weighted
average annual effective income tax rate expected for the full financial year. [IAS 34
Appendix B12]
An appendix to IAS 34 provides guidance for applying the basic recognition and measurement
principles at interim dates to various types of asset, liability, income, and expense.
Materiality
In deciding how to recognise, measure, classify, or disclose an item for interim financial
reporting purposes, materiality is to be assessed in relation to the interim period financial data,
not forecast annual data. [IAS 34.23]
The financial period of the Company covers one year from 1 January to 31 December.
Comment:
The standard IAS 34 — Interim Financial Reporting is not available in the SBL annual report as
they mentioned their financial period is from 1 January to 31 December. This means one year
where we know in Interim Financial Reporting, a financial reporting period shorter than a full
financial year (most typically a quarter or half-year).
Disclosure
If impairment losses recognised (reversed) are material in aggregate to the financial statements
as a whole, disclose: [IAS 36.131]
Disclose detailed information about the estimates used to measure recoverable amounts of cash
generating units containing goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.
The Company reviews the carrying values of tangible and intangible assets for any possible
impairment at each date of Statement of Financial Position. An impairment loss is recognized
when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. In assessing the
recoverable amount, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value at
appropriate discount rates.
Comment:
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
Recognition of a Provision
- a present obligation (legal or constructive) has arisen as a result of a past event (the
obligating event)
- payment is probable ('more likely than not') and
- the amount can be estimated reliably
Measurement of Provisions
The amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to
settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, that is, the amount that an entity would
rationally pay to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date or to transfer it to a third party.
This means:
In reaching its best estimate, the entity should take into account the risks and uncertainties that
surround the underlying events.
Remeasurement of Provisions
Restructuring Provision
Disclosures
- opening balance
- additions
- closing balance
- nature
- timing
- uncertainties
- assumptions
- reimbursement, if any.
Use of the Respective Standard in SBL Annual Report
In the note number 8.3, under the caption “Provision for doubtful debts”, company has showed
detail measurement of their provision for doubtful debts for 2018.
79,384,436
In the note number 40 (J), company clearly spelled out that they are measuring the provision
accordingly to standard.
A provision for warranties is recognised when the underlying products or services are sold. The
provision is based on historical warranty data and a weighing of all possible outcomes against
their associated probabilities.
Comment:
SBL followed the standard for accounting treatment of provision. As there was no need to apply
restructuring provision, company did not use it.
Contingent liability and contingent asset is disclosed as a note to the accounts only, no entries are
made into the financial statements other than disclosure. [ CITATION ACC1 \l 18441 ]
There are contingent liabilities on account of disputed bank guarantees and claims by the
customs authority. Contingent liabilities of SBL are-
Comment:
So we can say that, for the accounting treatments for Contingent Liabilities and Contingent
Assets company is following IAS 37.
Initial measurement
An entity must choose either the cost model or the revaluation model for each class of intangible
asset. [IAS 38.72]
Cost model. After initial recognition intangible assets should be carried at cost less accumulated
amortisation and impairment losses. [IAS 38.74]
Revaluation model. Intangible assets may be carried at a revalued amount (based on fair value)
less any subsequent amortisation and impairment losses only if fair value can be determined by
reference to an active market. [IAS 38.75] Such active markets are expected to be uncommon for
intangible assets. [IAS 38.78] Examples where they might exist:
production quotas
fishing licences
taxi licences
Under the revaluation model, revaluation increases are recognised in other comprehensive
income and accumulated in the "revaluation surplus" within equity except to the extent that they
reverse a revaluation decrease previously recognised in profit and loss. If the revalued intangible
has a finite life and is, therefore, being amortised (see below) the revalued amount is amortised.
[IAS 38.85]
The cost less residual value of an intangible asset with a finite useful life should be amortised on
a systematic basis over that life: [IAS 38.97]
The amortisation charge is recognised in profit or loss unless another IFRS requires that it
be included in the cost of another asset.
Expected future reductions in selling prices could be indicative of a higher rate of consumption
of the future economic benefits embodied in an asset. [IAS 18.92]
The standard contains a rebuttable presumption that a revenue-based amortisation method for
intangible assets is inappropriate. However, there are limited circumstances when the
presumption can be overcome:
it can be demonstrated that revenue and the consumption of economic benefits of the
intangible asset are highly correlated. [IAS 38.98A]
An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life should not be amortised. [IAS 38.107]
Its useful life should be reviewed each reporting period to determine whether events and
circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life assessment for that asset. If they do
not, the change in the useful life assessment from indefinite to finite should be accounted for as a
change in an accounting estimate. [IAS 38.109]
The asset should also be assessed for impairment in accordance with IAS 36. [IAS 38.111]
Subsequent expenditure: Due to the nature of intangible assets, subsequent expenditure will
only rarely meet the criteria for being recognised in the carrying amount of an asset. [IAS 38.20]
Subsequent expenditure on brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and similar items
must always be recognised in profit or loss as incurred. [IAS 38.63]
Disclosure
For each class of intangible asset, disclose: [IAS 38.118 and 38.122]
amortisation method
reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and the end of the period showing:
o revaluations
o impairments
o reversals of impairments
o amortisation
certain special disclosures about intangible assets acquired by way of government grants
The company SBL reported their intangible asset and also consolidated intangible assets of year
2017 and 2018:
And also in the report the company SBL said
An intangible asset is recognised if it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the
entity and the cost of the asset can be measured reliably in accordance with IAS 38 - ‘Intangible
Assets’. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are measured at cost, less accumulated
amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed to be either finite or indefinite.
Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits
embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other expenditure, including expenditure on
internally-generated goodwill and brands are recognised in profit or loss as incurred.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for
impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The
amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life
are reviewed at least at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the
expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset is accounted
for by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and treated as changes in
accounting estimates. Amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in
profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, from the date they are
available-for-use.
Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset are measured as the difference
between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognised in
profit and loss when the asset is derecognised.
Comment:
Hence, for the above discussion it is clear that SBL all the rules and principles laid out by the
standard IAS 38 — Intangible asset.
IAS 40 was reissued in December 2003 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005.
Initial measurement
Investment property is initially measured at cost, including transaction costs. Such cost should
not include start-up costs, abnormal waste, or initial operating losses incurred before the
investment property achieves the planned level of occupancy. [IAS 40.20 and 40.23]
One method must be adopted for all of an entity's investment property. Change is permitted only
if this results in a more appropriate presentation. IAS 40 notes that this is highly unlikely for a
change from a fair value model to a cost model.
Investment property is premeasured at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. [IAS 40.5] Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of
investment property must be included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises. [IAS
40.35]
Fair value should reflect the actual market state and circumstances as of the balance sheet date.
[IAS 40.38] The best evidence of fair value is normally given by current prices on an active
market for similar property in the same location and condition and subject to similar lease and
other contracts. [IAS 40.45] In the absence of such information, the entity may consider current
prices for properties of a different nature or subject to different conditions, recent prices on less
active markets with adjustments to reflect changes in economic conditions, and discounted cash
flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows. [IAS 40.46]
There is a rebuttable presumption that the entity will be able to determine the fair value of an
investment property reliably on a continuing basis. However: [IAS 40.53]
If an entity determines that the fair value of an investment property under construction is not
reliably determinable but expects the fair value of the property to be reliably determinable when
construction is complete, it measures that investment property under construction at cost until
either its fair value becomes reliably determinable or construction is completed. If an entity
determines that the fair value of an investment property (other than an investment property under
construction) is not reliably determinable on a continuing basis, the entity shall measure that
investment property using the cost model in IAS 16. The residual value of the investment
property shall be assumed to be zero. The entity shall apply IAS 16 until disposal of the
investment property.
Where a property has previously been measured at fair value, it should continue to be measured
at fair value until disposal, even if comparable market transactions become less frequent or
market prices become less readily available. [IAS 40.55]
Cost model
After initial recognition, investment property is accounted for in accordance with the cost model
as set out in IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment – cost less accumulated depreciation and less
accumulated impairment losses. [IAS 40.56]
Transfers to, or from, investment property should only be made when there is a change in use,
evidenced by one or more of the following: [IAS 40.57 (note that this list was changed from an
exhaustive list to an non-exhaustive list of examples by Transfers of Investment Property in
December 2016 effective 1 January 2018) ]
When an entity decides to sell an investment property without development, the property is not
reclassified as inventory but is dealt with as investment property until it is derecognised. [IAS
40.58]
The following rules apply for accounting for transfers between categories:
for a transfer from investment property carried at fair value to owner-occupied property or
inventories, the fair value at the change of use is the 'cost' of the property under its new
classification [IAS 40.60] for a transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property
carried at fair value, IAS 16 should be applied up to the date of reclassification. Any difference
arising between the carrying amount under IAS 16 at that date and the fair value is dealt with as
a revaluation under IAS 16 [IAS 40.61] for a transfer from inventories to investment property at
fair value, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and it previous carrying
amount should be recognised in profit or loss [IAS 40.63] when an entity completes
construction/development of an investment property that will be carried at fair value, any
difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and the previous carrying amount should
be recognised in profit or loss. [IAS 40.65]
When an entity uses the cost model for investment property, transfers between categories do not
change the carrying amount of the property transferred, and they do not change the cost of the
property for measurement or disclosure purposes.
Disposal
Disclosure
whether the fair value or the cost model is used if the fair value model is used, whether property
interests held under operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property if
classification is difficult, the criteria to distinguish investment property from owner-occupied
property and from property held for sale the extent to which the fair value of investment property
is based on a valuation by a qualified independent valuer; if there has been no such valuation,
that fact must be disclosed the amounts recognised in profit or loss for:
rental income from investment property direct operating expenses (including repairs and
maintenance) arising from investment property that generated rental income during the period
direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property
that did not generate rental income during the period the cumulative change in fair value
recognised in profit or loss on a sale from a pool of assets in which the cost model is used into a
pool in which the fair value model is used restrictions on the realisability of investment property
or the remittance of income and proceeds of disposal contractual obligations to purchase,
construct, or develop investment property or for repairs, maintenance or enhancements
a reconciliation between the carrying amounts of investment property at the beginning and end of
the period, showing additions, disposals, fair value adjustments, net foreign exchange
differences, transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes
[IAS 40.76] significant adjustments to an outside valuation (if any) [IAS 40.77] if an entity that
otherwise uses the fair value model measures an item of investment property using the cost
model, certain additional disclosures are required [IAS 40.78]
The depreciation methods used the useful lives or the depreciation rates used the gross carrying
amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at
the beginning and end of the period a reconciliation of the carrying amount of investment
property at the beginning and end of the period, showing additions, disposals, depreciation,
impairment recognised or reversed, foreign exchange differences, transfers to and from
inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes the fair value of investment
property. If the fair value of an item of investment property cannot be measured reliably,
additional disclosures are required, including, if possible, the range of estimates within which
fair value is highly likely to lie
Since all the lands and properties the company holds are held for use in the production or supply
of goods or services or for administrative purposes, property held for sale in the ordinary course
of business or in the process of construction of development for such sale etc. , so the IAS 40 is
not applicable.
Comment:
So, we can say that the company does not follow the rules and regulations as prescribed by IAS
40.
IAS 41 — Agriculture
IAS 41 Agriculture sets out the accounting for agricultural activity – the transformation of
biological assets (living plants and animals) into agricultural produce (harvested product of the
entity's biological assets). The standard generally requires biological assets to be measured at fair
value less costs to sell.
Measurement
Biological assets within the scope of IAS 41 are measured on initial recognition and at
subsequent reporting dates at fair value less estimated costs to sell, unless fair value cannot be
reliably measured. [IAS 41.12]
Agricultural produce is measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the point of harvest.
[IAS 41.13] Because harvested produce is a marketable commodity, there is no 'measurement
reliability' exception for produce.
The gain on initial recognition of biological assets at fair value less costs to sell, and changes in
fair value less costs to sell of biological assets during a period, are included in profit or loss. [IAS
41.26]
A gain on initial recognition (e.g. as a result of harvesting) of agricultural produce at fair value
less costs to sell are included in profit or loss for the period in which it arises. [IAS 41.28]
All costs related to biological assets that are measured at fair value are recognised as expenses
when incurred, other than costs to purchase biological assets.
IAS 41 presumes that fair value can be reliably measured for most biological assets. However,
that presumption can be rebutted for a biological asset that, at the time it is initially recognised,
does not have a quoted market price in an active market and for which alternative fair value
measurements are determined to be clearly unreliable. In such a case, the asset is measured at
cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. But the entity must still measure all of
its other biological assets at fair value less costs to sell. If circumstances change and fair value
becomes reliably measurable, a switch to fair value less costs to sell is required. [IAS 41.30]
Guidance on the determination of fair value is available in IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.
IFRS 13 also requires disclosures about fair value measurements.
Government grants
Unconditional government grants received in respect of biological assets measured at fair value
less costs to sell are recognised in profit or loss when the grant becomes receivable. [IAS 41.34]
If such a grant is conditional (including where the grant requires an entity not to engage in
certain agricultural activity), the entity recognises the grant in profit or loss only when the
conditions have been met. [IAS 41.35]
Disclosure
aggregate gain or loss from the initial recognition of biological assets and agricultural
produce and the change in fair value less costs to sell during the period* [IAS 41.40]
information about biological assets whose title is restricted or that are pledged as security
[IAS 41.49]
* Separate and/or additional disclosures are required where biological assets are measured at cost
less accumulated depreciation [IAS 41.55]
If fair value cannot be measured reliably, additional required disclosures include: [IAS 41.54]
depreciation method
gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation, beginning and ending.
If the fair value of biological assets previously measured at cost subsequently becomes available,
certain additional disclosures are required. [IAS 41.56]
Disclosures relating to government grants include the nature and extent of grants, unfulfilled
conditions, and significant decreases expected in the level of grants. [IAS 41.57]
Comment:
This standard is not applicable for SBL annual report. IAS-41 deals with agriculture so there is
no relationship between agriculture and SBL company.
Entity requires to prepare and present the opening balance of balance sheet items at the
transitional date. This is the first thing that entity need to do in their transitional works.
Such presentation is quite an importance for users to understand how the effect of
transitional from GAAP to IFRS.
It is required by IFRS 1 that entity shall use the same accounting policies for opening
balance items and all other items in the period. The entity should use the same accounting
policies for opening balance and these accounting policies are to be used consistently
over the next periods. All of those accounting policies must be comply with IFRS at the
time of transition.
Transitional from one IFRS to others IFRS is not applicable for this standard. For
example, when the entity’s Financial Statements are already used IFRS. And some IFRS
require changing. Then, the application of IFRS 1 is not applicable to such a situation.
The Transitional of GAAP to IFRS should be used the last release of IFRS.
The entity should apply IFRS to measure all items in Financial Statements. That means
all items in Financial Statements are required to use IFRS to measures.
Recognize all items of assets and liabilities that permit by IFRS. The entity should
recognize all assets and liabilities that permit by IFRS.
Derecognize all items that are not permitted. The entity should also derecognize all items
of assets and liabilities if those items are not permitted per IFRS.
The entity should perform adjustment of the effect between GAAP and IFRS is go to
retain earning. During the transitional, there are some items going to be effective by the
transition from GAAP to IFRS. All of the effects are required by IFRS 1 to be recognized
in retain earning.
In general, the application of transitional from current GAAP to IFRS require that opening
balance need to be retrospective in Financial Statement. However, because the retrospective
costs are high for some areas; therefore, IFRS 1 provides guidance on what areas must be
retrospective and what areas that you can decide to apply or not.
b) For a reconciliation of equity reported under previous accounting framework to equity under
IFRSs:
The framework to total comprehensive income under IFRSs for the entity’s most recent
annual
Financial statements under previous accounting framework
d) Interim financial reports Error under previous GAAP and Additional disclosure should clearly
stated and present in the report.
Comment
So, we can say that the company does not follow the rules and regulations as prescribed by IFRS
1.
IFRS 2 was originally issued in February 2004 and first applied to annual periods beginning on
or after 1 January 2005.
A share-based payment is a transaction in which the entity receives goods or services either as
consideration for its equity instruments or by incurring liabilities for amounts based on the price
of the entity's shares or other equity instruments of the entity. The accounting requirements for
the share-based payment depend on how the transaction will be settled, that is, by the issuance of
(a) equity, (b) cash, or (c) equity or cash.
The issuance of shares or rights to shares requires an increase in a component of equity. IFRS 2
requires the offsetting debit entry to be expensed when the payment for goods or services does
not represent an asset. The expense should be recognised as the goods or services are consumed.
For example, the issuance of shares or rights to shares to purchase inventory would be presented
as an increase in inventory and would be expensed only once the inventory is sold or impaired.
The issuance of fully vested shares, or rights to shares, is presumed to relate to past service,
requiring the full amount of the grant-date fair value to be expensed immediately. The issuance
of shares to employees with, say, a three-year vesting period is considered to relate to services
over the vesting period. Therefore, the fair value of the share-based payment, determined at the
grant date, should be expensed over the vesting period.
As a general principle, the total expense related to equity-settled share-based payments will equal
the multiple of the total instruments that vest and the grant-date fair value of those instruments.
In short, there is truing up to reflect what happens during the vesting period. However, if the
equity-settled share-based payment has a market related performance condition, the expense
would still be recognised if all other vesting conditions are met. The following example provides
an illustration of a typical equity-settled share-based payment.
Measurement guidance
Depending on the type of share-based payment, fair value may be determined by the value of the
shares or rights to shares given up, or by the value of the goods or services received:
Measuring employee share options. For transactions with employees and others
providing similar services, the entity is required to measure the fair value of the equity
instruments granted, because it is typically not possible to estimate reliably the fair value
of employee services received.
When to measure fair value - options. For transactions measured at the fair value of the
equity instruments granted (such as transactions with employees), fair value should be
estimated at grant date.
When to measure fair value - goods and services. For transactions measured at the fair
value of the goods or services received, fair value should be estimated at the date of
receipt of those goods or services.
Measurement guidance. For goods or services measured by reference to the fair value of
the equity instruments granted, IFRS 2 specifies that, in general, vesting conditions are
not taken into account when estimating the fair value of the shares or options at the
relevant measurement date (as specified above). Instead, vesting conditions are taken into
account by adjusting the number of equity instruments included in the measurement of
the transaction amount so that, ultimately, the amount recognised for goods or services
received as consideration for the equity instruments granted is based on the number of
equity instruments that eventually vest.
More measurement guidance. IFRS 2 requires the fair value of equity instruments
granted to be based on market prices, if available, and to take into account the terms and
conditions upon which those equity instruments were granted. In the absence of market
prices, fair value is estimated using a valuation technique to estimate what the price of
those equity instruments would have been on the measurement date in an arm's length
transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. The standard does not specify which
particular model should be used.
If fair value cannot be reliably measured. IFRS 2 requires the share-based payment
transaction to be measured at fair value for both listed and unlisted entities. IFRS 2
permits the use of intrinsic value (that is, fair value of the shares less exercise price) in
those "rare cases" in which the fair value of the equity instruments cannot be reliably
measured. However this is not simply measured at the date of grant. An entity would
have to remeasure intrinsic value at each reporting date until final settlement.
The determination of whether a change in terms and conditions has an effect on the amount
recognised depends on whether the fair value of the new instruments is greater than the fair value
of the original instruments (both determined at the modification date).
Modification of the terms on which equity instruments were granted may have an effect on the
expense that will be recorded. IFRS 2 clarifies that the guidance on modifications also applies to
instruments modified after their vesting date. If the fair value of the new instruments is more
than the fair value of the old instruments (e.g. by reduction of the exercise price or issuance of
additional instruments), the incremental amount is recognised over the remaining vesting period
in a manner similar to the original amount. If the modification occurs after the vesting period, the
incremental amount is recognised immediately. If the fair value of the new instruments is less
than the fair value of the old instruments, the original fair value of the equity instruments granted
should be expensed as if the modification never occurred.
Disclosure
the nature and extent of share-based payment arrangements that existed during the period
how the fair value of the goods or services received, or the fair value of the equity
instruments granted, during the period was determined
the effect of share-based payment transactions on the entity's profit or loss for the period
and on its financial position.
Comment:
We saw there is two exemptions for IFRS 2. First, the issuance of shares in a business
combination should be accounted for under IFRS 3 Business Combinations. However, care
should be taken to distinguish share-based payments related to the acquisition from those related
to continuing employee services. So, we can find it in IFRS 3 so in the SBL report IFRS 2 is not
present.
Business combinations can occur in various ways, such as by transferring cash, incurring
liabilities, issuing equity instruments (or any combination thereof) or by not issuing
consideration at all (i.e. by contract alone)
Business combinations can be structured in various ways to satisfy legal, taxation or other
objectives including one entity becoming a subsidiary of another, the transfer of net assets
from one entity to another or to a new entity
The business combination must involve the acquisition of a business which generally has
three elements:
Inputs – an economic resource (e.g. non-current assets, intellectual property) that
creates outputs when one or more processes are applied to it
Process – a system, standard, protocol, convention or rule that when applied to an
input or inputs, creates outputs (e.g. strategic management, operational processes,
resource management)
Output – the result of inputs and processes applied to those inputs.
Disclosure
Among the disclosures required to meet the foregoing objective are the following:
Among the disclosures required to meet the foregoing objective are the following:
details when the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete for particular
assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests or items of consideration (and the amounts
recognized in the financial statements for the business combination thus have been
determined only provisionally) follow-up information on contingent consideration
follow-up information about contingent liabilities recognized in a business combination
a reconciliation of the carrying amount of goodwill at the beginning and end of the
reporting period, with various details shown separately
the amount and an explanation of any gain or loss recognized in the current reporting
period that both:
relates to the identifiable assets acquired or liabilities assumed in a business
combination that was affecting in the current or previous reporting period, and
is of such a size, nature or incidence that disclosure is relevant to understanding the
combined entity's financial statements.
On 16October 2017, SBL acquiredfurther3, 186,920shares out of3, 789,653shares newly issued
by IAL. The acquisition of new shares entitled SBL to 83.8319% shareholding in IAL including
the 33.8500% call option of Sunman. The new shareholding structure gave SBL the power to
direct IAL's relevant activities, the ability to use its power over IAL to affect the amount of
SBL's returns and gave SBL the rights to variable returns from its involvement with IAL.
Therefore, as per IFRS 10 paragraph7, SBL obtained the control of IAL and was assessed to be
the parent company of IAL from the acquisition date, i.e. 16 October 2017.
SBL's interest in IAL shall reduceto49.9819% if Sunman exercises its call option within1
March2023. The Company shall still preserve its control over IAL without having majority of
shareholdings.
The following judgements were made in determining that SBL has obtained control over IAL:
(i) SBL currently holds 83.8319% of total shares; (ii) Majority of the board members of
IAL are employees of SBL; and
(ii) (II) IAL cannot do any business except for selling its products to SBL without having
written approval from SBL
As IAL was equity accounted investee of SBL so this was a step acquisition as per of IFRS 3 "an
acquirer sometimes obtains control of an acquiring which it held an equity interest immediately
before the acquisition date. This IFRS refers to such a transaction as a business combination
achieved in stages, sometimes also referred to as a step acquisition
Basis of consolidation
The Group account for business combination using the acquisition method when control is
transferred to the Group
(i)). The consideration transferred in the acquisition are generally measured at fair value, as are
the identifiable net asset acquired. Any goodwill that arises is tested annually for impairment.
Any gain on a bargain purchase is recognized in profit or loss immediately. Transaction costs are
expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.
(i) Subsidiaries Subsidiaries are the entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an
entity when it is exposed to, or has the rights to variable returns from its involvement with the
entity and has the ability to affects those returns through its power over the entity. The financial
statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on
which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
(ii) Non-controlling interests Non-controlling Interest (NCI) are measured initially at their
proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets at the date of acquisition.
(iii) Loss of control When the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognizes the assets
and liabilities of the subsidiary, and any related NCI and other components of equity. Any
resulting gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. Any interest retained in the former subsidiary
is measured at fair value when control is lost.
Comment:
Hence, from the above discussion, it is clear that SBL follows all the rules and principles laid out
by the standard IFRS 3- Business Combinations.
IFRS 4 - Insurance Contracts
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts applies, with limited exceptions, to all insurance contracts (including
reinsurance contracts) that an entity issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds. In light of
the IASB's comprehensive project on insurance contracts, the standard provides a temporary
exemption from the requirements of some other IFRSs, including the requirement to consider
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors when selecting
accounting policies for insurance contracts.
Accounting policies
The IFRS exempts an insurer temporarily (until completion of Phase II of the Insurance Project)
from some requirements of other IFRSs, including the requirement to consider IAS 8 Accounting
Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors in selecting accounting policies for
insurance contracts. However, the standard: [IFRS 4.14]
prohibits provisions for possible claims under contracts that are not in existence at the
reporting date (such as catastrophe and equalisation provisions)
requires a test for the adequacy of recognised insurance liabilities and an impairment test
for reinsurance assets
requires an insurer to keep insurance liabilities in its balance sheet until they are
discharged or cancelled, or expire, and prohibits offsetting insurance liabilities against
related reinsurance assets and income or expense from reinsurance contracts against the
expense or income from the related insurance contract.
IFRS 4 permits an insurer to change its accounting policies for insurance contracts only if, as a
result, its financial statements present information that is more relevant and no less reliable, or
more reliable and no less relevant. [IFRS 4.22] In particular, an insurer cannot introduce any of
the following practices, although it may continue using accounting policies that involve them:
[IFRS 4.25]
measuring insurance liabilities on an undiscounted basis
The IFRS permits the introduction of an accounting policy that involves remeasuring designated
insurance liabilities consistently in each period to reflect current market interest rates (and, if the
insurer so elects, other current estimates and assumptions). Without this permission, an insurer
would have been required to apply the change in accounting policies consistently to all similar
liabilities. [IFRS 4.24]
Prudence
An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts to eliminate excessive
prudence. However, if an insurer already measures its insurance contracts with sufficient
prudence, it should not introduce additional prudence.
Asset classifications
When an insurer changes its accounting policies for insurance liabilities, it may reclassify some
or all financial assets as 'at fair value through profit or loss'. [IFRS 4.45]
Other issues
The standard:
clarifies that an insurer need not account for an embedded derivative separately at fair
value if the embedded derivative meets the definition of an insurance contract [IFRS 4.7-
8]
requires an insurer to unbundle (that is, to account separately for) deposit components of
some insurance contracts, to avoid the omission of assets and liabilities from its balance
sheet [IFRS 4.10]
clarifies the applicability of the practice sometimes known as 'shadow accounting' [IFRS
4.30]
Disclosures
information that helps users understand the amounts in the insurer's financial statements
that arise from insurance contracts: [IFRS 4.36-37]
o accounting policies for insurance contracts and related assets, liabilities, income,
and expense
o the recognised assets, liabilities, income, expense, and cash flows arising from
insurance contracts
o information about the assumptions that have the greatest effect on the
measurement of assets, liabilities, income, and expense including, if practicable,
quantified disclosure of those assumptions
Information that helps users to evaluate the nature and extent of risks arising from
insurance contracts: [IFRS 4.38-39]
o those terms and conditions of insurance contracts that have a material effect on
the amount, timing, and uncertainty of the insurer's future cash flows
o information about insurance risk (both before and after risk mitigation by
reinsurance), including information about:
o the information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk that IFRS 7 would
require if the insurance contracts were within the scope of IFRS 7
On 12 September 2016, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 4 providing two options for
entities that issue insurance contracts within the scope of IFRS 4:
an option that permits entities to reclassify, from profit or loss to other comprehensive
income, some of the income or expenses arising from designated financial assets; this is
the so-called overlay approach;
an optional temporary exemption from applying IFRS 9 for entities whose predominant
activity is issuing contracts within the scope of IFRS 4; this is the so-called deferral
approach.
An entity choosing to apply the overlay approach retrospectively to qualifying financial assets
does so when it first applies IFRS 9. An entity choosing to apply the deferral approach does so
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The application of both approaches is
optional and an entity is permitted to stop applying them before the new insurance contracts
standard is applied.
Comment:
We know that IFRS 4 applies to all insurance contracts (including reinsurance contracts) that an
entity issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds, except for specified contracts covered by
other Standards. It does not apply to other assets and liabilities of an insurer, such as financial
assets and financial liabilities within the scope of IFRS 9. Furthermore, it does not address
accounting by policyholders. Since Singer company did not issue any such insurance contract so
the IFRS 4 is not applicable".
Held-for-sale classification
In general, the following conditions must be met for an asset or disposal group to be classified as
held for sale:
The assets need to be disposed of through sale. Therefore, operations that are expected to be
wound down or abandoned would not meet the definition (but may be classified as discontinued
once abandoned).
An entity that is committed to a sale involving loss of control of a subsidiary that qualifies for
held-for-sale classification under IFRS 5 classifies all of the assets and liabilities of that
subsidiary as held for sale even if the entity will retain a non-controlling interest in its former
subsidiary after the sale.
The classification, presentation and measurement requirements of IFRS 5 also apply to a non-
current asset (or disposal group) that is classified as held for distribution to owners. The entity
must be committed to the distribution and the assets must be available for immediate distribution
and the distribution must be highly probable.
A 'disposal group' is a group of assets, possibly with some associated liabilities which an entity
intends to dispose of in a single transaction. The measurement basis required for non-current
assets classified as held for sale is applied to the group as a whole and any resulting impairment
loss reduces the carrying amount of the non-current assets in the disposal group in the order of
allocation required by IAS 36.
Measurement
*The measurement provisions of IFRS 5 do not apply to deferred tax assets, assets arising from
employee benefits, financial assets within the scope of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, non-current
assets measured at fair value in accordance with IAS 41 Agriculture, and contractual rights under
insurance contracts.
Presentation
Assets classified as held for sale and the assets and liabilities included within a disposal group
classified as held for sale must be presented separately on the face of the statement of financial
position.
Disclosures
IFRS 5 requires the following disclosures about assets (or disposal groups) that are held for sale:
*Disclosures in other IFRSs do not apply to assets held for sale (or discontinued operations,
discussed below) unless those other IFRSs require specific disclosures in respect of such
assets or in respect of certain measurement disclosures where assets and liabilities are outside
the scope of the measurement requirements of IFRS 5.
Classification as discontinuing
IFRS 5 prohibits the retroactive classification as a discontinued operation, when the discontinued
criteria are met after the end of the reporting period.
The sum of the post-tax profit or loss of the discontinued operation and the post-tax gain or loss
recognized on the measurement to fair value less cost to sell or fair value adjustments on the
disposal of the assets (or disposal group) is presented as a single amount on the face of the
statement of comprehensive income. If the entity presents profit or loss in a separate statement, a
section identified as relating to discontinued operations is presented in that separate statement.
Detailed disclosure of revenue, expenses, pre-tax profit or loss and related income taxes is
required either in the notes or in the statement of comprehensive income in a section distinct
from continuing operations. Such detailed disclosures must cover both the current and all prior
periods presented in the financial statements.
The net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing, and financing activities of a
discontinued operation is separately presented on the face of the cash flow statement or disclosed
in the notes.
Disclosures
Information about IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations in SBL
annual report is not available
Comment
There is no information about IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued in
SBL annual report. Therefore, it is clear that it is not applicable.
IFRS 6 permits an entity to develop an accounting policy for recognition of exploration and
evaluation expenditures as assets without specifically considering the requirements of paragraphs
11 and 12 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. [IFRS
6.9] Thus, an entity adopting IFRS 6 may continue to use the accounting policies applied
immediately before adopting the IFRS. This includes continuing to use recognition and
measurement practices that are part of those accounting policies.
Impairment
An entity treats exploration and evaluation assets as a separate class of assets and make the
disclosures required by either IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment or IAS 38 Intangible
Assets consistent with how the assets are classified. [IFRS 6.25]
IFRS 6 requires disclosure of information that identifies and explains the amounts recognised in
its financial statements arising from the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources,
including: [IFRS 6.23–24]
its accounting policies for exploration and evaluation expenditures including the
recognition of exploration and evaluation assets
the amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expense and operating and investing cash
flows arising from the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
As any information about IFRS 6 is not available in the annual report therefore, it is clear that it
is not applicable.
IFRS 7-
- adds certain new disclosures about financial instruments to those previously required by
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation (as it was then cited)
- replaces the disclosures previously required by IAS 30 Disclosures in the Financial
Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions
- puts all of those financial instruments disclosures together in a new standard on Financial
Instruments: Disclosures. The remaining parts of IAS 32 deal only with financial
instruments presentation matters.
IFRS requires certain disclosures to be presented by category of instrument based on the IAS 39
measurement categories. Certain other disclosures are required by class of financial instrument.
For those disclosures an entity must group its financial instruments into classes of similar
instruments as appropriate to the nature of the information presented. [IFRS 7.6]
Other disclosures
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements:
1. to understand the relationship between transferred financial assets that are not
derecognised in their entirety and the associated liabilities; and
2. to evaluate the nature of, and risks associated with, the entity's continuing involvement in
derecognised financial assets. [IFRS 7 42B]
- Required disclosures include description of the nature of the transferred assets, nature of
risk and rewards as well as description of the nature and quantitative disclosure depicting
relationship between transferred financial assets and the associated liabilities. [IFRS
7.42D]
- Required disclosures include the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities recognised,
fair value of the assets and liabilities that represent continuing involvement, maximum
exposure to loss from the continuing involvement as well as maturity analysis of the
undiscounted cash flows to repurchase the derecognised financial assets. [IFRS 7.42E]
- Additional disclosures are required for any gain or loss recognised at the date of transfer
of the assets, income or expenses recognise from the entity's continuing involvement in
the derecognised financial assets as well as details of uneven distribution of proceed from
transfer activity throughout the reporting period. [IFRS 7.42G]
The Company initially recognises receivables and deposits on the date that they are originated.
All other financial assets are recognised initially on the date at which the Company becomes a
party to the contractual provisions of the transaction. The Company derecognises a financial
asset when the contractual rights or probabilities of receiving the cash flows from the asset
expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows on the financial asset in a
transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are
transferred.
Financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and long term
receivables and deposits.
Determination of fair value is not required as per the requirements of IFRS 7 and the fair value
was not that much significant. That’s why they did not showed their fair value.
Comment:
Overview
IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires particular classes of entities (essentially those with publicly
traded securities) to disclose information about their operating segments, products and services,
the geographical areas in which they operate, and their major customers. Information is based on
internal management reports, both in the identification of operating segments and measurement
of disclosed segment information.
IFRS 8 was issued in November 2006 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2009.
Scope
IFRS 8 applies to the separate or individual financial statements of an entity (and to the
consolidated financial statements of a group with a parent):
However, when both separate and consolidated financial statements for the parent are presented
in a single financial report, segment information need be presented only on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements [IFRS 8.4]
Operating segments
that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses
(including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the
same entity)
whose operating results are reviewed regularly by the entity's chief operating decision
maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its
performance and
for which discrete financial information is available
Reportable segments
IFRS 8 requires an entity to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable
segments. Reportable segments are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments
that meet specified criteria: [IFRS 8.13]
its reported revenue, from both external customers and intersegment sales or transfers, is
10 per cent or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all operating
segments, or
the absolute measure of its reported profit or loss is 10 per cent or more of the greater, in
absolute amount, of (i) the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not
report a loss and (ii) the combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported a
loss, or
its assets are 10 per cent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment if
aggregation is consistent with the core principles of the standard, the segments have similar
economic characteristics and are similar in various prescribed respects. [IFRS 8.12]
If the total external revenue reported by operating segments constitutes less than 75 per cent of
the entity's revenue, additional operating segments must be identified as reportable segments
(even if they do not meet the quantitative thresholds set out above) until at least 75 per cent of
the entity's revenue is included in reportable segments. [IFRS 8.15]
Disclosure requirements
# This disclosure requirement was added by Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010–2012 Cycle,
effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014.
* This disclosure is required only if such amounts are regularly provided to the chief operating
decision maker, or in the case of specific items of revenue and expense or asset-related items, if
those specified amounts are included in the relevant measure (segment profit or loss or segment
assets). Considerable segment information is required at interim reporting dates by IAS 34.
IFRS 8 defines an operating segment as a component of an entity that engages in revenue earning
business activities, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker and for which discrete financial information is available. In view of the standard,
the company has two identified segments namely i. Appliances and ii. Furniture. The furniture
segment of the Company does not qualify to be a reportable segment as per the quantitative
thresholds of IFRS 8. Therefore, the entity-wide disclosures required by the standard for the only
reportable segment i.e. appliances segment are disclosed.
Comment
Segment reporting is not applicable for the Company this year as the Company does not meet the
criteria required for segment reporting specified in IFRS 8: "Operating Segments”.
All financial instruments are initially measured at fair value plus or minus, in the case of a
financial asset or financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs.
[IFRS 9, paragraph 5.1.1]
Where assets are measured at fair value, gains and losses are either recognised entirely in profit
or loss (fair value through profit or loss, FVTPL), or recognised in other comprehensive income
(fair value through other comprehensive income, FVTOCI).
The classification of a financial asset is made at the time it is initially recognised, namely when
the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. [IFRS 9, paragraph
4.1.1] If certain conditions are met, the classification of an asset may subsequently need to be
reclassified.
Debt instruments
A debt instrument that meets the following two conditions must be measured at amortised cost
(net of any write down for impairment) unless the asset is designated at FVTPL under the fair
value option (see below):
Business model test: The objective of the entity's business model is to hold the financial asset
to collect the contractual cash flows (rather than to sell the instrument prior to its contractual
maturity to realise its fair value changes).
Cash flow characteristics test: The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified
dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount
outstanding.
Financial liabilities
All financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost, except for financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss. Such liabilities include derivatives (other than derivatives that are financial
guarantee contracts or are designated and effective hedging instruments), other liabilities held for
trading, and liabilities that an entity designates to be measured at fair value through profit or loss
(see ‘fair value option’ below). After initial recognition, an entity cannot reclassify any financial
liability.
Impairment
Hedge accounting
The objective of hedge accounting is to represent, in the financial statements, the effect of an
entity’s risk management activities that use financial instruments to manage exposures arising
from particular risks that could affect profit or loss or other comprehensive income.
IFRS 9 identifies three types of hedging relationships and prescribes special accounting
provisions for each:
fair value hedge: a hedge of the exposure to changes in fair value of a recognised asset or
liability or an unrecognised firm commitment, or a component of any such item, that is
attributable to a particular risk and could affect profit or loss.
cash flow hedge: a hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to
a particular risk associated with all, or a component of, a recognised asset or liability
(such as all or some future interest payments on variable-rate debt) or a highly probable
forecast transaction, and could affect profit or loss.
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation as defined in IAS 21.
When an entity first applies IFRS 9, it may choose to continue to apply the hedge accounting
requirements of IAS 39, instead of the requirements in IFRS 9, to all of its hedging relationships
Regarding IFRS 9 we have found the following information in the Annual Report:
Comment:
So we can say that the company follows the rules and regulations as prescribed by IFRS 9.
Accounting requirements
A parent prepares consolidated financial statements using uniform accounting policies for like
transactions and other events in similar circumstances. [IFRS 10:19]
However, a parent need not present consolidated financial statements if it meets all of the
following conditions: [IFRS 10:4(a)]
its debt or equity instruments are not traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign
stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local and regional markets)
it did not file, nor is it in the process of filing, its financial statements with a securities
commission or other regulatory organization for the purpose of issuing any class of
instruments in a public market, and
its ultimate or any intermediate parent of the parent produces financial statements
available for public use that comply with IFRSs, in which subsidiaries are consolidated or
are measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 10.*
* Fair value measurement clause added by Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation
Exception (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28) amendments, effective 1 January
2016.
Consolidation procedures
combine like items of assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows of the
parent with those of its subsidiaries
offset (eliminate) the carrying amount of the parent's investment in each subsidiary and
the parent's portion of equity of each subsidiary
eliminate in full intragroup assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows
relating to transactions between entities of the group (profits or losses resulting from
intragroup transactions that are recognised in assets, such as inventory and fixed assets,
are eliminated in full).
A reporting entity includes the income and expenses of a subsidiary in the consolidated financial
statements from the date it gains control until the date when the reporting entity ceases to control
the subsidiary. Income and expenses of the subsidiary are based on the amounts of the assets and
liabilities recognized in the consolidated financial statements at the acquisition date.
The parent and subsidiaries are required to have the same reporting dates, or consolidation based
on additional financial information prepared by subsidiary, unless impracticable. Where
impracticable, the most recent financial statements of the subsidiary are used, adjusted for the
effects of significant transactions or events between the reporting dates of the subsidiary and
consolidated financial statements. The difference between the date of the subsidiary's financial
statements and that of the consolidated financial statements shall be no more than three months
A reporting entity attributes the profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive
income to the owners of the parent and to the non-controlling interests. The proportion allocated
to the parent and non-controlling interests are determined on the basis of present ownership
interests.
The reporting entity also attributes total comprehensive income to the owners of the parent and
to the non-controlling interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit
balance.
Changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in the parent losing
control of the subsidiary are equity transactions (i.e. transactions with owners in their capacity as
owners). When the proportion of the equity held by non-controlling interests changes, the
carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests area adjusted to reflect the
changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount by which
the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received
is recognized directly in equity and attributed to the owners of the parent.
derecognizes the assets and liabilities of the former subsidiary from the consolidated
statement of financial position
recognizes any investment retained in the former subsidiary when control is lost and
subsequently accounts for it and for any amounts owed by or to the former subsidiary in
accordance with relevant IFRSs. That retained interest is premeasured and the
premeasured value is regarded as the fair value on initial recognition of a financial asset
in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments or, when appropriate, the cost on initial
recognition of an investment in an associate or joint venture
recognises the gain or loss associated with the loss of control attributable to the former
controlling interest.
If a parent loses control of a subsidiary that does not contain a business in a transaction with an
associate or a joint venture gains or losses resulting from those transactions are recognised in the
parent's profit or loss only to the extent of the unrelated investors' interests in that associate or
joint venture.*
* Added by Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint
Venture amendments, effective 1 January 2016, however, the effective date of the amendment
was later deferred indefinitely.
[Note: The investment entity consolidation exemption was introduced by Investment Entities,
issued on 31 October 2012 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2014.]
IFRS 10 contains special accounting requirements for investment entities. Where an entity meets
the definition of an 'investment entity' , it does not consolidate its subsidiaries.
An entity is required to consider all facts and circumstances when assessing whether it is an
investment entity, including its purpose and design. IFRS 10 provides that an investment entity
should have the following typical characteristics [IFRS 10:28]:
However, an investment entity is still required to consolidate a subsidiary where that subsidiary
provides services that relate to the investment entity’s investment activities.
* Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12
and IAS 28) clarifies, effective 1 January 2016, that this relates to a subsidiary that is not itself an
investment entity and whose main purpose and activities are providing services that relate to the
investment entity's investment activities.
Because an investment entity is not required to consolidate its subsidiaries, intragroup related
party transactions and outstanding balances are not eliminated [IAS 24.4, IAS 39.80].
Special requirements apply where an entity becomes, or ceases to be, an investment entity.
The exemption from consolidation only applies to the investment entity itself. Accordingly, a
parent of an investment entity is required to consolidate all entities that it controls, including
those controlled through an investment entity subsidiary, unless the parent itself is an investment
entity. [IFRS 10:33]
Disclosure
There are no disclosures specified in IFRS 10. Instead, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities outlines the disclosures required.
The Group account for business combination using the acquisition method when control is
transferred to the Group
The consideration transferred in the acquisition are generally measured at fair value, as are the
identifiable net asset acquired. Any goodwill that arises is tested annually for impairment. Any
gain on a bargain purchase is recognized in profit or loss immediately. Transaction costs are
expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.
(i) Subsidiaries: Subsidiaries are the entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an
entity when it is exposed to, or has the rights to variable returns from its involvement with the
entity and has the ability to affects those returns through its power over the entity. The financial
statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on
which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
(ii) Non-controlling interests: Non-controlling Interest (NCI) are measured initially at their
proportionate share of the acquirer’s identifiable net assets at the date of acquisition.
(iii) Loss of control: When the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognizes the assets
and liabilities of the subsidiary, and any related NCI and other components of equity. Any
resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss. Any interest retained in the former subsidiary
is measured at fair value when control is lost.
(iv) Transactions eliminated on consolidation : Intra-group balances and transactions, and any
unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised
gains arising from transactions with equity accounted investees are eliminated against the
investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are eliminated
in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of
impairment.
Comment:
As we know consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities.
Here we know SBL company maintain the consolidation.
The standard IFRS 10 available in the SBL annual report as they shows their consolidated
financial statement in the report in every aspect.
Disclosure
There are no disclosures specified in IFRS 11. Instead, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities outlines the disclosures required.
Note: This section has been updated to reflect the amendments to IFRS 11 made in June 2012.
When IFRS 11 is first applied, an entity need only present the quantitative information required
by paragraph 28(f) of IAS 8 for the annual period immediately preceding the first annual period
for which the standard is applied [IFRS 11:C1B]
transition from proportionate consolidation to the equity method for joint ventures
transition from the equity method to accounting for assets and liabilities for joint
operations
transition in an entity's separate financial statements for a joint operation previously
accounted for as an investment at cost.
In general terms, the special transitional adjustments are required to be applied at the beginning
of the immediately preceding period (rather than the the beginning of the earliest period
presented). However, an entity may choose to present adjusted comparative information for
earlier reporting periods, and must clearly identify any unadjusted comparative information and
explain the basis on which the comparative information has been prepared [IFRS 11.C12A-
C12B].
An entity may apply IFRS 11 to an earlier accounting period, but if doing so it must disclose the
fact that is has early adopted the standard and also apply: [IFRS 11.Appendix C1]
SBL annual report doesn’t contain any information about IFRS 11.
Comment
As any information about IFRS 11 is not available in the annual report therefore, it is clear that it
is not applicable.
Disclosures required
An entity discloses information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made (and
changes in those judgements and assumptions) in determining: [IFRS 12:7]
Interests in subsidiaries
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its consolidated financial statements to:
[IFRS 12:10]
An entity making these disclosures are not required to provide various other disclosures required
by IFRS 12 [IFRS 12:21A, IFRS 12:25A].
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate:
[IFRS 12:20]
- the nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in joint arrangements and
associates, including the nature and effects of its contractual relationship with the other
investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, joint arrangements and
associates
- the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in joint ventures and
associates.
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to: [IFRS 12:24]
- understand the nature and extent of its interests in unconsolidated structured entities
- evaluate the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in
unconsolidated structured entities. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
Comment:
The objective of a fair value measurement is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction
to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the
measurement date under current market conditions. A fair value measurement requires an entity
to determine all of the following: [IFRS 13:B2]
the particular asset or liability that is the subject of the measurement (consistently with its
unit of account)
for a non-financial asset, the valuation premise that is appropriate for the measurement
(consistently with its highest and best use)
the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability
the valuation technique(s) appropriate for the measurement, considering the availability of
data with which to develop inputs that represent the assumptions that market participants
would use when pricing the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy within
which the inputs are categorised.
Guidance on measurement
IFRS 13 provides the guidance on the measurement of fair value, including the following:
An entity takes into account the characteristics of the asset or liability being measured that a
market participant would take into account when pricing the asset or liability at measurement
date (e.g. the condition and location of the asset and any restrictions on the sale and use of
the asset) [IFRS 13:11]
Fair value measurement assumes an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date under current market conditions [IFRS 13:15]
Fair value measurement assumes a transaction taking place in the principal market for the
asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for
the asset or liability [IFRS 13:24]
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account its highest and best use
[IFRS 13:27]
A fair value measurement of a financial or non-financial liability or an entity's own equity
instruments assumes it is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date, without
settlement, extinguishment, or cancellation at the measurement date [IFRS 13:34]
The fair value of a liability reflects non-performance risk (the risk the entity will not fulfil an
obligation), including an entity's own credit risk and assuming the same non-performance
risk before and after the transfer of the liability [IFRS 13:42]
An optional exception applies for certain financial assets and financial liabilities with
offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk, provided conditions are met
(additional disclosure is required). [IFRS 13:48, IFRS 13:96]
Valuation techniques
An entity uses valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient
data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and
minimising the use of unobservable inputs. [IFRS 13:61, IFRS 13:67]
The objective of using a valuation technique is to estimate the price at which an orderly
transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market
participants and the measurement date under current market conditions. Three widely used
valuation techniques are: [IFRS 13:62]
market approach – uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable (similar) assets, liabilities, or a group of assets
and liabilities (e.g. a business)
cost approach – reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service
capacity of an asset (current replacement cost)
income approach – converts future amounts (cash flows or income and expenses) to a single
current (discounted) amount, reflecting current market expectations about those future
amounts.
In some cases, a single valuation technique will be appropriate, whereas in others multiple
valuation techniques will be appropriate. [IFRS 13:63]
Disclosure
Disclosure objective
IFRS 13 requires an entity to disclose information that helps users of its financial statements
assess both of the following: [IFRS 13:91]
for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis
in the statement of financial position after initial recognition, the valuation techniques and
inputs used to develop those measurements
for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), the effect of the
measurements on profit or loss or other comprehensive income for the period.
Disclosure exemptions
SBL annual report doesn’t contain any information about IFRS 13.
Comment
As any information about IFRS 13 is not available in the annual report therefore, it is clear that it
is not applicable.
The effect of the exemption is that eligible entities can continue to apply the accounting policies
used for regulatory deferral account balances under the basis of accounting used immediately
before adopting IFRS ('previous GAAP') when applying IFRSs, subject to the presentation
requirements of IFRS 14 [IFRS 14.11].
Entities are permitted to change their accounting policies for regulatory deferral account balances
in accordance with IAS 8, but only if the change makes the financial statements more relevant
and no less reliable, or more reliable and not less relevant, to the economic decision-making
needs of users of the entity's financial statements. However, an entity is not permitted to change
accounting policies to start to recognise regulatory deferral account balances. [IFRS 14.13]
Deferred tax assets and liabilities arising from regulatory deferral account balances are
presented separately from total deferred tax amounts and movements in those deferred tax
balances are presented separately from tax expense (income)
Entities applying IFRS 14 are required to present an additional basic and diluted earnings per
share that excludes the impacts of the net movement in regulatory deferral account balances
The impact of regulatory deferral account balances are separately presented in an entity's
financial statements. This requirements applies regardless of the entity's previous presentation
policies in respect of regulatory deferral balance accounts under its previous GAAP.
Accordingly:
Separate line items are presented in the statement of financial position for the total of all
regulatory deferral account debit balances, and all regulatory deferral account credit balances
[IFRS 14.20] Regulatory deferral account balances are not classified between current and non-
current, but are separately disclosed using subtotals [IFRS 14.21] The net movement in
regulatory deferral account balances are separately presented in the statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income using subtotals [IFRS 14.22-23]
The Illustrative examples accompanying IFRS 14 set out an illustrative presentation of financial
statements by an entity applying the Standard.
Disclosures
IFRS 14 sets out disclosure objectives to allow users to assess: [IFRS 14.27]
The nature of, and risks associated with, the rate regulation that establishes the price(s) the entity
can charge customers for the goods or services it provides - including information about the
entity's rate-regulated activities and the rate-setting process, the identity of the rate regulator(s),
and the impacts of risks and uncertainties on the recovery or reversal of regulatory deferral
balance accounts the effects of rate regulation on the entity's financial statements - including the
basis on which regulatory deferral account balances are recognised, how they are assessed for
recovery, a reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the reporting
period, discount rates applicable, income tax impacts and details of balances that are no longer
considered recoverable or reversible. [ CITATION IAS2 \l 18441 ]
In the Annual Report of Singer Company, we did not find any information regarding the
regulatory deferral accounts or any other things related to IFRS 14.
Comment:
So, we can say that the company doesn’t follow the rules and regulations as prescribed by IFRS
14.
A contract with a customer will be within the scope of IFRS 15 if all the following conditions are
met:
Performance obligations are promises to transfer distinct goods or services to a customer. Some
contracts contain more than one performance obligation. The distinct performance obligations
within a contract must be identified.
Performance obligation may not be limited to the goods or services that are explicitly stated in
the contract. An entity’s customary business practices, published policies or specific statements
may create an expectation that the entity will transfer good or service to the customer.
If an entity is an agent, then revenue is recognized based on the fee or commission to which it is
entitled.
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for transferring promised goods or service to a customer.
Amounts collected on behalf of third parties (such as sales tax) are excluded.
The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable
amounts or both.
When determining the transaction price, an entity shall consider the effects of all the following:
- variable consideration
- the existence of a significant financing component in the contract
- non-cash consideration
- consideration payable to a customer
The total transaction price should be allocated to each performance obligation in proportion to
stand-alone selling prices.
The best evidence of a stand-alone selling price is the observable price of a good or service when
the entity sells that good or service separately in similar circumstanced and to similar customers.
If a stand-alone selling price is not directly observable, then the entity estimates the stand-alone
selling price.
Discounts:
In relation to a bundle sale, any discount should generally be allocated across each component in
the transaction. A discount should only be allocated to a specific component of the transaction if
that component is regularly sold separately at a discount.
Revenue is recognized when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation be transferring a
promised good or service to a customer.
For each performance obligation identified, an entity must determine at contract inception
whether it satisfies the performance obligation over time or satisfies the performance obligation
at a point in time. [ CITATION ACC1 \l 18441 ]
The Group has adopted IFRS 15 using the cumulative effect method (without practical
expedients), with the effect of initially applying this standard recognised at the date of initial
application (i.e. 1 January 2018). Accordingly, the information presented for 2017 has not been
restated – i.e. it is presented, as previously reported, under IAS 18, IAS 11 and related
interpretations. Additionally, the disclosure requirements in IFRS 15 have not generally been
applied to comparative information. There was no material impact of adopting IFRS 15 on the
Group’s statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018 and its statement of profit or loss
and OCI for the year ended 31 December 2018 and the statement of cash flows for the year then
ended.
Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. The
Group recognizes revenue when it transfers control over a good or service to a customer.
Comment:
SBL follow IFRS 15 to recognize their revenue from customers.
IFRS 16 – Leases
IFRS 16 specifies how an IFRS reporter will recognise, measure, present and disclose leases.
The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognise assets and
liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a
low value. Lessors continue to classify leases as operating or finance, with IFRS 16’s approach
to lessor accounting substantially unchanged from its predecessor, IAS 17.
Accounting by lessees
Upon lease commencement a lessee recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. [IFRS
16:22]
The right-of-use asset is initially measured at the amount of the lease liability plus any initial
direct costs incurred by the lessee. Adjustments may also be required for lease incentives,
payments at or prior to commencement and restoration obligations or similar. [IFRS 16:24]
After lease commencement, a lessee shall measure the right-of-use asset using a cost model,
unless: [IFRS 16:29, 34, 35]
i) the right-of-use asset is an investment property and the lessee fair values its investment
property under IAS 40; or
ii) the right-of-use asset relates to a class of PPE to which the lessee applies IAS 16’s revaluation
model, in which case all right-of-use assets relating to that class of PPE can be revalued.
Under the cost model a right-of-use asset is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and
accumulated impairment. [IFRS 16:30(a)]
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments payable over
the lease term, discounted at the rate implicit in the lease if that can be readily determined. If that
rate cannot be readily determined, the lessee shall use their incremental borrowing rate. [IFRS
16:26]
Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate are included in the initial measurement
of the lease liability and are initially measured using the index or rate as at the commencement
date. Amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees are also
included. [IFRS 16:27(b),(c)]
Variable lease payments that are not included in the measurement of the lease liability are
recognised in profit or loss in the period in which the event or condition that triggers payment
occurs, unless the costs are included in the carrying amount of another asset under another
Standard. [IFRS 16:38(b)
The lease liability is subsequently remeasured to reflect changes in: [IFRS 16:36]
The lease term (using a revised discount rate); the assessment of a purchase option (using a
revised discount rate); the amounts expected to be payable under residual value guarantees
(using an unchanged discount rate); or future lease payments resulting from a change in an index
or a rate used to determine those payments (using an unchanged discount rate).
The remeasurements are treated as adjustments to the right-of-use asset. [IFRS 16:39]
Lease modifications may also prompt remeasurement of the lease liability unless they are to be
treated as separate leases. [IFRS 16:36(c)]
Accounting by lessors
Lessors shall classify each lease as an operating lease or a finance lease. [IFRS 16:61]
A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards
incidental to ownership of an underlying asset. Otherwise a lease is classified as an operating
lease. [IFRS 16:62]
Examples of situations that individually or in combination would normally lead to a lease being
classified as a finance lease are: [IFRS 16:63]
The lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term the lessee has
the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be sufficiently lower than fair
value at the date the option becomes exercisable that, at the inception of the lease, it is
reasonably certain that the option will be exercised the lease term is for the major part of the
economic life of the asset, even if title is not transferred at the inception of the lease, the present
value of the minimum lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the
leased asset the leased assets are of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can use them
without major modifications being made
Upon lease commencement, a lessor shall recognise assets held under a finance lease as a
receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease. [IFRS 16:67]
A lessor recognises finance income over the lease term of a finance lease, based on a pattern
reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment. [IFRS 16:75]
At the commencement date, a manufacturer or dealer lessor recognises selling profit or loss in
accordance with its policy for outright sales to which IFRS 15 applies. [IFRS 16:71c)]
A lessor recognises operating lease payment as income on a straight-line basis or, if more
representative of the pattern in which benefit from use of the underlying asset is diminished,
another systematic basis. [IFRS 16:81]
To determine whether the transfer of an asset is accounted for as a sale an entity applies the
requirements of IFRS 15 for determining when a performance obligation is satisfied. [IFRS
16:99]
If an asset transfer satisfies IFRS 15’s requirements to be accounted for as a sale the seller
measures the right-of-use asset at the proportion of the previous carrying amount that relates to
the right of use retained. Accordingly, the seller only recognises the amount of gain or loss that
relates to the rights transferred to the buyer. [IFRS 16:100a)]
If the fair value of the sale consideration does not equal the asset’s fair value, or if the lease
payments are not market rates, the sales proceeds are adjusted to fair value, either by accounting
for prepayments or additional financing. [IFRS 16:101]
Disclosure
The objective of IFRS 16’s disclosures is for information to be provided in the notes that,
together with information provided in the statement of financial position, statement of profit or
loss and statement of cash flows, gives a basis for users to assess the effect that leases have.
Paragraphs 52 to 60 of IFRS 16 set out detailed requirements for lessees to meet this objective
and paragraphs 90 to 97 set out the detailed requirements for lessors. [IFRS 16:51, 89]
Regarding IFRS 16 we have found the following information in the Annual Report:
IFRS 16 introduces a single, on-balance sheet lease accounting model for lessees. A lessee
recognises a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and a lease
liability representing its obligation to make lease payments. There are recognition exemptions for
short-term leases and leases of low-value items. Lessor accounting remains similar to the current
standard – i.e. lessors continue to classify leases as finance or operating leases. IFRS 16 replaces
existing leases guidance, including IAS 17 Leases, IFRIC 4 Determining whether an
Arrangement contains a Lease, SIC-15 Operating Leases – Incentives and SIC-27 Evaluating the
Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease. The standard is effective for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. Although early adoption is permitted, the
Group has not early adopted IFRS 16 in preparing these financial statements. The most
significant impact identified is that, the Group will recognise new assets and liabilities for its
operating leases of retail stores / showrooms, warehouses, service centers, factories and other
offices facilities. In addition, the nature of expenses related to those leases will now change as
IFRS 16 replaces the straight-line operating lease expense with a depreciation charge for right-
of-use assets and interest expense on lease liabilities. Previously, the Group recognised operating
lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, and recognised liabilities only to
the extent that there was a timing difference between actual lease payments and the expense
recognised. The Group has no finance leases. As a lessee, the Group plans to apply IFRS 16
initially on 1 January 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Therefore, the cumulative
effect of adopting IFRS 16 will be recognised as an adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings at 1 January 2019, with no restatement of comparative information. The Group
also plans to apply IFRS 16 to all contracts entered into before 1 January 2019 and identified as
leases in accordance with IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. The Group is currently assessing the impact of
initially applying the standard on the elements of financial statements. [ CITATION Sng \l 18441 ]
Comment:
So, we can say that the company follows the rules and regulations as prescribed by IFRS 16.
IFRS 17 was issued in May 2017 and applies to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1
January 2021.
Measurement
On initial recognition, an entity shall measure a group of insurance contracts at the total of:
An entity shall include all the future cash flows within the boundary of each contract in the
group. The entity may estimate the future cash flows at a higher level of aggregation and then
allocate the resulting fulfilment cash flows to individual groups of contracts.
The estimates of future cash flows shall be current, explicit, unbiased, and reflect all the
information available to the entity without undue cost and effort about the amount, timing and
uncertainty of those future cash flows. They should reflect the perspective of the entity, provided
that the estimates of any relevant market variables are consistent with observable market prices.
Discount rates
reflect the time value of money (TVM), the characteristics of the cash flows and the liquidity
characteristics of the insurance contracts
be consistent with observable current market prices (if any) of those financial instruments
whose cash flow characteristics are consistent with those of the insurance contracts and
exclude the effect of factors that influence such observable market prices but do not affect
the future cash flows of the insurance contracts.
The estimate of the present value of the future cash flows is adjusted to reflect the compensation
that the entity requires for bearing the uncertainty about the amount and timing of future cash
flows that arises from non-financial risk.
The CSM represents the unearned profit of the group of insurance contracts that the entity will
recognize as it provides services in the future. This is measured on initial recognition of a group
of insurance contracts at an amount that, unless the group of contracts is onerous, results in no
income or expenses arising from:
Subsequent measurement
On subsequent measurement, the carrying amount of a group of insurance contracts at the end of
each reporting period shall be the sum of:
Onerous contracts
An insurance contract is onerous at initial recognition if the total of the FCF, any previously
recognized acquisition cash flows and any cash flows arising from the contract at that date is a
net outflow. An entity shall recognize a loss in profit or loss for the net outflow, resulting in the
carrying amount of the liability for the group being equal to the FCF and the CSM of the group
being zero.
An entity may simplify the measurement of the liability for remaining coverage of a group of
insurance contracts using the Premium Allocation Approach (PAA) on the condition that, at the
inception of the group:
the entity reasonably expects that this will be a reasonable approximation of the
general model, or
the coverage period of each contract in the group is one year or less.
Where, at the inception of the group, an entity expects significant variances in the FCF during
the period before a claim is incurred such contracts are not eligible to apply the PAA.
Using the PAA, the liability for remaining coverage shall be initially recognized as the
premiums, if any, received at initial recognition, minus any insurance acquisition cash flows.
Subsequently the carrying amount of the liability is the carrying amount at the start of the
reporting period plus the premiums received in the period, minus insurance acquisition cash
flows, plus amortization of acquisition cash flows, minus the amount recognized as insurance
revenue for coverage provided in that period and minus any investment component paid or
transferred to the liability for incurred claims.
If insurance contracts in the group have a significant financing component, the liability for
remaining coverage needs to be discounted, however, this is not required if, at initial recognition,
the entity expects that the time between providing each part of the coverage and the due date of
the related premium is no more than a year.
In applying PAA, an entity may choose to recognize any insurance acquisition cash flows as an
expense when it incurs those costs, provided that the coverage period at initial recognition is no
more than a year.
The simplifications arising from the PAA do not apply to the measurement of the group’s
liability for incurred claims, measured under the general model. However, there is no need to
discount those cash flows if the balance is expected to be paid or received in one year or less
from the date the claims are incurred.
An investment contract with a DPF is a financial instrument and it does not include a transfer of
significant insurance risk. It is in the scope of the standard only if the issuer also issues insurance
contracts. The requirements of the Standard are modified for such investment contracts.
The requirements of the standard are modified for reinsurance contracts held.
In estimating the present value of future expected cash flows for reinsurance contracts, entities
use assumptions consistent with those used for related direct insurance contracts. Additionally,
estimates include the risk of reinsurer’s non-performance.
The risk adjustment for non-financial risk is estimated to represent the transfer of risk from the
holder of the reinsurance contract to the reinsurer.
On initial recognition, the CSM is determined similarly to that of direct insurance contracts
issued, except that the CSM represents net gain or loss on purchasing reinsurance. On initial
recognition, this net gain or loss is deferred unless the net loss relates to events that occurred
before purchasing a reinsurance contract (in which case it is expensed immediately).
Subsequently, reinsurance contracts held are accounted similarly to insurance contracts under the
general model. Changes in reinsurer’s risk of non-performance are reflected in profit or loss and
do not adjust the CSM.
If the terms of an insurance contract are modified, an entity shall derecognize the original
contract and recognize the modified contract as a new contract if there is a substantive
modification, based on meeting any of the specified criteria.
if, had the modified terms been included at contract’s inception, this would have led to:
(i) exclusion from the Standard’s scope
(ii) unbundling of different embedded derivatives
(iii) redefinition of the contract boundary or
(iv) the reallocation to a different group of contracts or
if the original contract met the definition of a direct par insurance contracts, but the
modified contract no longer meets that definition, or vice versa or
the entity originally applied the PAA, but the contract’s modifications made it no longer
eligible for it.
Derecognition
An entity shall disaggregate the amounts recognized in the statement(s) of financial performance
into: [IFRS 17:80]
an insurance service result, comprising insurance revenue and insurance service expenses;
and
insurance finance income or expenses.
Income or expenses from reinsurance contracts held shall be presented separately from the
expenses or income from insurance contracts issued.
An entity shall present in profit or loss revenue arising from the groups of insurance contracts
issued, and insurance service expenses arising from a group of insurance contracts it issues,
comprising incurred claims and other incurred insurance service expenses. Revenue and
insurance service expenses shall exclude any investment components. An entity shall not present
premiums in the profit or loss, if that information is inconsistent with revenue presented.
Insurance finance income or expenses comprises the change in the carrying amount of the group
of insurance contracts arising from:
the effect of the time value of money and changes in the time value of money and
the effect of changes in assumptions that relate to financial risk but
excluding any such changes for groups of insurance contracts with direct participating
insurance contracts that would instead adjust the CSM.
An entity has an accounting policy choice between including all of insurance finance income or
expense for the period in profit or loss or disaggregating it between an amount presented in profit
or loss and an amount presented in other comprehensive income (“OCI”).
Under the general model, disaggregating means presenting in profit or loss an amount
determined by a systematic allocation of the expected total insurance finance income or expenses
over the duration of the group of contracts. On derecognition of the groups amounts remaining in
OCI are reclassified to profit or loss.
Under the VFA, for direct par insurance contracts, only where the entity holds the underlying
items, disaggregating means presenting in profit or loss as insurance finance income or expenses
an amount that eliminates the accounting mismatches with the finance income or expenses
arising on the underlying items. On derecognition of the groups, the amounts previously
recognized in OCI remain there.
Disclosures
the amounts recognized in its financial statements that arise from insurance contracts
the significant judgements and changes in those judgements made when applying IFRS 17
and
the nature and extent of the risks that arise from insurance contracts.
Effective date
IFRS 17 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021. Earlier
application is permitted if both IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and IFRS 9
Financial Instruments have also been applied.
Transition
An entity shall apply the standard retrospectively unless impracticable, in which case entities
have the option of using either the modified retrospective approach or the fair value approach.
Under the modified retrospective approach, an entity shall utilize reasonable and supportable
information and maximize the use of information that would have been used to apply a full
retrospective approach, but need only use information available without undue cost or effort.
Under this approach the use of hindsight is permitted, if that is the only practical source of
information for the restatement of prior periods.
Under the fair value approach, an entity determines the CSM at the transition date as the
difference between the fair value of a group of insurance contracts at that date and the FCF
measured at that date. Using this approach, on transition there is no need for annual groups.
At the date of initial application of the Standard, those entities already applying IFRS 9 may
retrospectively re-designate and reclassify financial assets held in respect of activities connected
with contracts within the scope of the Standard.
Entities can choose not to restate IFRS 9 comparatives with any difference between the previous
carrying amount of those financial assets and the carrying amount at the date of initial
application recognized in the opening equity at the date of initial application. Any restatements
of prior periods must reflect all the requirements of IFRS 9.
Though there is no information about the use of IFRS 17- insurance contract, there is information
available about the applicability of IFRS 15 and IFRS 9.
The Group has initially applied IFRS 15 (see A) and IFRS 9 (see B) from 1 January 2018. These
two new standards do not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements. Due to the
transition methods chosen by the Group in applying these standards, comparative information
throughout these financial statements has not been restated to reflect the requirements of the new
standards.
There was no material impact of adopting IFRS 15 on the Group’s statement of financial position
as at 31 December 2018 and its statement of profit or loss and OCI for the year ended 31
December 2018 and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended.
IFRS 9 sets out requirements for recognizing and measuring financial assets, financial liabilities
and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items. This standard replaces IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. There was no material impact of adopting IFRS 9
on the Group’s statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018 and its statement of profit
or loss and OCI for the year ended 31 December 2018 and the statement of cash flows for the
year then ended. IFRS 9 contains three principal classification categories for financial assets:
measured at amortized cost, FVOCI and FVTPL. The classification of financial assets under
IFRS 9 is generally based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its
contractual cash flow characteristics. IFRS 9 eliminates the previous IAS 39 categories of held to
maturity, loans and receivables and available for sale. Under IFRS 9, derivatives embedded in
contracts where the host is a financial asset in the scope of the standard are never separated.
Instead, the hybrid financial instrument as a whole is assessed for classification. IFRS 9 largely
retains the existing requirements in IAS 39 for the classification and measurement of financial
liabilities.
The adoption of IFRS 9 has not had a significant effect on the Group’s accounting policies
related to financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments (for derivatives that are used as
hedging instruments). For additional information about the Group’s accounting policies relating
to financial instruments.
Comment
IFRS 17 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021. Earlier
application is permitted if both IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and IFRS 9
Financial Instruments have also been applied. Though there is information available about the
applicability of IFRS 15 and IFRS 9, there is no information about the applicability of IFRS 17-
insurance contract in SBL annual report.
Conclusion
From the analysis of annual report 2018 of Singer Bangladesh, we can say that SBL is following
most of the standards of accounting. That makes their annual report more transparent. Users can
take more effective decisions as the information on the report are very clear and can be compare
with the other companies. Company is trying to adopt the other standards too.
Reference