Levy and Collection of Tax PDF
Levy and Collection of Tax PDF
Levy and Collection of Tax PDF
Statutory Provisions
7. Scope of supply
(1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes––
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter,
exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a
consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;
(b) import of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or
furtherance of business; and 1
(c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a
consideration; and 2
(d) the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services as
referred to in Schedule II 3
(1A) Where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordance with
the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply of
goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II. 4
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), ––
(a) activities or transactions specified in Schedule III; or
(b) such activities or transactions undertaken by the Central Government, a State
Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public
1
Inserted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017
2
Omitted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017
3
Omitted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017
4
Inserted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
SCHEDULE I
[See section 7]
ACTIVITIES TO BE TREATED AS SUPPLY EVEN IF MADE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION
1. Permanent transfer or disposal of business assets where input tax credit has been
availed on such assets.
2. Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct
persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of
business:
Provided that gifts not exceeding fifty thousand rupees in value in a financial year by
an employer to an employee shall not be treated as supply of goods or services or
both.
3. Supply of goods—
(a) by a principal to his agent where the agent undertakes to supply such goods on
behalf of the principal; or
(b) by an agent to his principal where the agent undertakes to receive such goods
on behalf of the principal.
4. Import of services by a person 6 from a related person or from any of his other
establishments outside India, in the course or furtherance of business
SCHEDULE II
[See section 7]
ACTIVITIES OR TRANSACTIONS 7 TO BE TREATED AS SUPPLY OF GOODS OR
SUPPLY OF SERVICES
5
Substituted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017.
Prior to substitution it was read as ”” sub-sections (1) and (2)”
6
Substituted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st February,
2019. Prior to substitution it was read as ”taxable person”
7
Inserted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st July, 2017
90 BGM on GST
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
1. Transfer
(a) any transfer of the title in goods is a supply of goods;
(b) any transfer of right in goods or of undivided share in goods without the transfer
of title thereof, is a supply of services;
(c) any transfer of title in goods under an agreement which stipulates that property
in goods shall pass at a future date upon payment of full consideration as
agreed, is a supply of goods
2. Land and Building
(a) any lease, tenancy, easement, licence to occupy land is a supply of services;
(b) any lease or letting out of the building including a commercial, industrial or
residential complex for business or commerce, either wholly or partly, is a
supply of services.
3. Treatment or process
Any treatment or process which is applied to another person's goods is a supply of
services.
4. Transfer of business assets
(a) where goods forming part of the assets of a business are transferred or
disposed of by or under the directions of the person carrying on the business
so as no longer to form part of those assets, whether or not for a consideration,
such transfer or disposal is a supply of goods by the person;
(b) where, by or under the direction of a person carrying on a business, goods held
or used for the purposes of the business are put to any private use or are used,
or made available to any person for use, for any purpose other than a purpose
of the business, whether or not for a consideration, the usage or making
available of such goods is a supply of services;
(c) where any person ceases to be a taxable person, any goods forming part of the
assets of any business carried on by him shall be deemed to be supplied by
him in the course or furtherance of his business immediately before he ceases
to be a taxable person, unless—
(i) the business is transferred as a going concern to another person; or
(ii) the business is carried on by a personal representative who is deemed to
be a taxable person.
5. Supply of services
The following shall be treated as supply of services, namely:—
CGST Act 91
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
92 BGM on GST
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
7. Supply of Goods
The following shall be treated as supply of goods, namely:—
Supply of goods by any unincorporated association or body of persons to a member
thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration.
SCHEDULE III
[See section 7]
ACTIVITIES OR TRANSACTIONS WHICH SHALL BE TREATED NEITHER AS A SUPPLY
OF GOODS NOR A SUPPLY OF SERVICES
1. Services by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his
employment.
2. Services by any court or Tribunal established under any law for the time being in
force.
3. (a) the functions performed by the Members of Parliament, Members of State
Legislature, Members of Panchayats, Members of Municipalities and Members
of other local authorities;
(b) the duties performed by any person who holds any post in pursuance of the
provisions of the Constitution in that capacity; or
(c) the duties performed by any person as a Chairperson or a Member or a
Director in a body established by the Central Government or a State
Government or local authority and who is not deemed as an employee before
the commencement of this clause.
4. Services of funeral, burial, crematorium or mortuary including transportation of the
deceased.
5. Sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building.
6. Actionable claims, other than lottery, betting and gambling.
7. [Supply of goods from a place in the non-taxable territory to another place in
the non-taxable territory without such goods entering into India.
8. (a) Supply of warehoused goods to any person before clearance for home
consumption;
(b) Supply of goods by the consignee to any other person, by endorsement
of documents of title to the goods, after the goods have been dispatched
from the port of origin located outside India but before clearance for
home consumption] 8
8
Inserted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st February, 2019
CGST Act 93
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of paragraph 2, the term "court" includes District
Court, High Court and Supreme Court.
Explanation 2.— For the purposes of paragraph 8, the expression “warehoused
goods” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Customs Act,
1962 9
9
Inserted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01st February, 2017
94 BGM on GST
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
7.1 Introduction
While the definition of the word ‘supply’ is inclusive, the legislature has carefully chosen not to
use the word/s such as “means”, or “means and includes”, “shall mean”, or “shall include”, etc.
A careful consideration of the above explanation would indicate that the draftsman is cautious
about any transaction of supply that might escape the levy. It is for this reason that despite
being exhaustive, the legislature has used the word “includes”.
A plain reading of the definition of the word ‘supply’ contained in Section 7(1) would invite
anybody’s attention to the 8 words – sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease or
disposal. Look at these 8 words – they are arranged in a descending order. Words 2 to 8 was
a subject matter of challenge under the erstwhile State-level VAT Laws. This ambiguity has
been done away with in the GST Laws. These 8 words together form a ‘continuum’. The last 7
words taper-off in their the absoluteness starting from the first of the forms of supply, that is,
‘sale’.
The Model GST Law released in June 2016 had included the meaning of the term ‘Supply’
within the clauses of the definition Section. However, in GST law, the term ‘supply’ is defined
by way of a separate and distinct section. One understands that the meaning attributed to the
term “Supply” is of very wide amplitude, but yet, an inclusive one. It must be noted that this
term is ordinarily attributable to an ‘outward supply’, unless the context so requires that the
term refers to an inward supply - say in case of importation of services or in respect of
transactions without consideration etc. Many things come within ‘supply’ but not everything is
‘supply’. Supply too has boundaries and many transactions are excluded from its grasp. This
points to a clear understanding that expression ‘supply’, although inclusively defined, does
have a recipe or a set of ingredients that each transaction must be tested against to see if it is
or is not a ‘supply’.
The word ‘supply’ could be understood as actual or implied. Implied supplies are governed by
the relevant Schedules. The three pillars of a supply would be:
(a) subject – viz. goods, services or goods treated as services. One cannot find an instance
in the GST statute where a supply of services is treated as a supply of goods.
(b) place of supply – to identify whether the transaction is an inter-State supply or an intra-
State supply
(c) time of supply – where legislature specifies ‘when’ the incidence is attracted.
CGST Act 95
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
7.2 Analysis
Supply:
(a) Generic meaning of ‘supply’: Supply includes all forms of supply (goods and / or
services) and includes agreeing to supply when the supply is for a consideration and in
the course or furtherance of business (as defined under Section 7 of the Act). It
specifically provides for the inclusion of the following 8 classes of transactions:
(i) Sale
(ii) Transfer
(iii) Barter
(iv) Exchange
(v) License
(vi) Rental
(vii) Lease
(viii) Disposal
The word ‘supply’ is all-encompassing, subject to exceptions carved out in the relevant
provisions. There are various ingredients that differentiate each of these eight forms of
supply. On a careful consideration of the purposeful usage of these eight adjectives to
enlist them as ‘forms’ of supply, it becomes clear that the legislature makes its intention
known by the choice of words that are deliberate and unambiguous. However, the
definition starts off with the phrase – “For the purpose of this Act”, which means that
wherever the term supply has been used anywhere in the Act, the meaning should
always be derived from this section 7 and cannot be substituted by any other
understanding of the term supply.
Barter means a “thing or commodity” given in ‘in return of’ another. In other words, no
value is fixed- viz., barter of wrist watch with a wall clock.
Disposal means distribution, transferring to new hands, extinguishment of control over,
forfeit or pass over control to another but in respect of goods that are ‘unfit for sale’.
Surely, discounted sale is not called disposal if the articles are still ‘fit for sale’.
Transfer means to pass over, convey, relinquishment of a right, abandonment of a
claim, alienate, each or any of the above acts, lawfully.
An attempt at identifying the characteristics of each of these forms of supply is provided
below:
96 BGM on GST
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
On an understanding of the above chart, one may infer that ‘supply’ is not a boundless
word of uncertain meaning. The inclusive part of the opening words in this clause may
be understood to include everything that supply is generally understood to be PLUS the
ones that are enlisted. It must be admitted that the general understanding of the word
‘supply’ is but an amalgam of these 8 forms of supply.
Please follow the brief discussion of the 8 forms of supply:
• Sale is a lawful, permanent and absolute transfer of ownership of property in goods
for money consideration under a valid contract such that no rights are left behind
with the transferor;
• Transfer is to lawfully convey property from one person to another. Here, consent of
transferor and capacity of transferee need not be present although all other
ingredients of a lawful contract are incumbent;
• Barter is where the consideration is in the form of goods or services (and not in
money) for a sale or transfer. So in general, barter is itself not a supply but the form
that consideration takes. But, when barter is called one of the forms of supply, it
covers other forms of supply whose consideration is non-monetary. Therefore,
barter will involve two supplies and not one. Each of these supplies would need to
be examined for its respective taxability;
• Exchange is where consideration is still not in money but in form of immovable
property (CIT v. Motors and General Stores Pvt Ltd AIR 1968 SC 200). Similar to
barter, exchange also involves two supplies. Given that land and (completed)
building is excluded from supply, exchange would be the supply whose
consideration is immovable property. And the object of supply itself may be of
goods or of services;
• Lease is where possession is transferred along with the right to use immovable
property with a duty to care, protect and return subject to normal wear and tear
along for consideration in the form of non-recurring premium only or along with
recurring rent. Essence of lease being delivery of possession along with user rights
is the reason lease is also used in the context of movable property (under the
earlier laws). Supplier of a lease does not have possession hence not enjoyt right to
CGST Act 97
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
use but retains right to repossess after term of lease. Lease is discussed first to
contrast it with rental and license;
• License is similar to lease except that possession is not transferred but mere
permission to enter and use the property (movable or immovable) is allowed along
with all other ingredients of a lease. Supplier of a license retains possession of the
property during the term of license without right to use (if license precludes joint
use). And after expiry of the term of license or on termination of license, the
licensee will be a trespasser;
• Rental is lease in respect of movable property. And since recurring payment in
lease (of immovable property) is called rental, transfer of possession with user
rights for recurring payment of consideration is interchangeably applied for movable
and immovable property; and
• Disposal is sale or transfer but property that does not possess merchantable
warranty. Articles that are not merchantable are not ‘fit for sale’ but trade does take
place for the reason that the supplier disposes the article without ascribing any
worth but the receipient accepts the article for some intrinsic worth that he is able to
extract or obtain. Article that does not answer to its description cannot normally
bring a valid contract into existence but due to the respective motivation of each
party, such articles are lawfully disposed off. In other wrods, although there is no
consensus as to the object of supply, the parties are consenting to enter into such a
contract for the respective reasons and considerations.
Any attempt at expanding this list of 8 forms of supply, in case of goods, must be
attempted with great caution. Attempting to find other forms of supply has in the normal
course did not yield the desired results. However, transactions that do not amount to
supply have been discovered viz., transactions in the nature of an assignment where
one person steps into the shoes of another, appears to slip away from the scope of
supply, as well as transactions where goods are destroyed without a transfer of any
kind taking place. Perhaps, the case of destruction of goods is not included within the
meaning of ‘supply’ considering that the input tax credits in respect of destroyed goods
is a blocked credit. However, the contradiction may continue until a clarification is
issued to state whether the blocked credits is in respect of goods that have been
destroyed before the availment of credits, or is applicable even in case where goods are
destroyed after the credits have been availed in respect of such goods.
Now looking at ‘services’, we find that the adjectives used to list the 8 forms of supply in
this clause are akin to transactions involving goods and not services. Services other
than licensing, rental and leasing services have not been specifically included in the
meaning of the term ‘supply’. However, transactions involving services are also
required to be passed through the same criteria for determination of supply. In doing
so, a slight adjustment in the way of looking at transactions involving services is
98 BGM on GST
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
CGST Act 99
Ch 3: Levy and Collection of Tax Sec. 7-11 / Rule 3-7
business’. This implies that it is only such of those supplies of goods and / or services
by a business entity would be liable to tax, so long as it is ‘in the course’ or ‘furtherance
of business’. Supplies that are not in the course of business or in furtherance of
business will not qualify as ‘supply’ for the purpose of levy of tax, except in case of
import of service for consideration, where the service is treated as a supply even if it is
not made in the course or furtherance of business.
The expression ‘in the course of’ must be construed differently from ‘in the course or’.
The GST Laws use the expression ‘in the course or’ and careful analysis is therefore,
essential. The expression ‘in the course’ appearing in Section 7(1)(a) does not appear
in Section 7(1)(b). However, one cannot lose sight of the fact that the expression ‘in the
course’ is used selectively in respect of transactions listed in Schedule I, II or III. The
import of this would mean that the meaning attributable to the expression ‘in the course’
would apply only in respect of such of those transaction, so listed, in the relevant
Schedules.
Let us now try to understand the meaning of the phrase ‘in the course’. The expression
‘in the course’ implies not only a period of time during which the movement or
transaction is in progress but postulates a connected relationship. Therefore, the class
of transactions needs to be analysed and cannot be randomly applied to the provisions
of Section 7 or Section 8. So construed, the word ‘or’ appearing in the phrase or
expression ‘in the course or furtherance of business’ assumes importance. When read
in a proper perspective, the preposition ‘or’ actually bisects the entire phrase into two
limbs. Therefore, the 8 forms of supply would tantamount to transaction of supply when
such supplies are in the course of business, or in the furtherance of business.
Therefore, the legislature has supplied huge amount of elasticity in understanding the
meaning of the term ‘supply’.
The term ‘business’ has been defined under the GST Laws to include:
(i) a wide range of activities (being “trade, commerce, manufacture, profession,
vocation, adventure, wager or any similar activity”),
(ii) “whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit”,
(iii) regardless of the “volume, frequency, continuity or regularity” of the activity.
(iv) and those “in connection with or incidental or ancillary to” such activities.
A recent order of the Authority for Advance Ruling – Kerala has ruled, in a matter
involving recovery of food expenses from employees for the canteen facility provided by
a Company, that such recovery falls within the definition of ‘outward supply’ and are
therefore taxable outward supplies under the GST law. In paragraph 9 of the order, the
AAR-Kerala has concluded that the supply of food by the applicant (Company) to its
employees would definitely come under clause (b) of Section 2(17) as a transaction
incidental or ancillary to the main business and thereby the test of ‘in the course or
furtherance of business’ is met by the applicant. – Order No. CT/531/18-C3 dated
26.03.2018.
Also, a question came up before Authority for Advance Ruling – Karnataka in the matter
of Columbia Asia, whether allocation of expenses to other registered units by Corporate
Office tantamount to supply of services between related or distinct persons as per Entry
2 to Schedule I to CGST Act and accordingly liable to tax. The Authority ruled that the
activities performed by the employees at the corporate office in the course of or in
relation to employment such as accounting, other administrative and IT system
maintenance for the units located in the other states as well i.e. distinct persons as per
Section 25(4) of the CGST Act shall be treated as supply as per Entry 2 of Schedule I of
the CGST Act.
Drawing similarities from the erstwhile State-level VAT laws, it follows that the said
transaction should be with a commercial motive, whether or not there is a profit motive
in it or its frequency / regularity. E.g.: sale of goods in an exhibition, participation in a
trade fair, warranty supplies, sale of used assets / scrap sales, etc. would be activities
in the course of business.
(c) Import of service will be taxable in the hands of the recipient (importer): The word
‘supply’ includes import of a service, made for a consideration (as defined in Section
2(31)) and whether or not in the course or furtherance of business. This implies that
import of services even for personal consumption would qualify as ‘supply’ and
therefore, would be liable to tax. This would not be subject to the threshold limit for
registration, as tax would be payable in case of import of services on reverse charge
basis, requiring the importer of service to compulsorily obtain registration in terms of
Section 24(ii) of the Act. Although import for personal purposes is included in the
definition of supply, entry 10(a) to Notification No. 9/2017-Int (Rate) dated 28 Jun 2017
exempts import of services under entire chapter 99 from payment of GST. However, the
GST law has ensured that persons who are not engaged in any business activities will
not be required to obtain registration and pay tax under reverse charge mechanism, and
it turn, requires the supplier of services located outside India, to obtain registration for
the OIDAR (online information and database access and retrieval) services only
Note: Import of services is included within the meaning of ‘supply’ under the CGST /
SGST Acts. However, it would be liable to IGST since it would not be an intra-State
supply. In fact, Section 2(21) of IGST Act has adopted the meaning of ‘supply’ from
CGST/SGST Act.
(d) Transactions without consideration: The law lists down, exhaustively, cases where a
transaction shall be treated as a ‘supply ‘even though there is no consideration. Such
transactions are listed in Schedule I. Once an activity is deemed to be a ‘supply’ under
the paragraph listed in Schedule I, the value of taxable supply shall be determined in
terms of provisions of Section 15(4) of the Act read with Chapter IV (Determination of
Value of Supply) of CGST Rules.
In this regard, it may be noted that on careful consideration of the essential ingredients
of a valid contract, it cannot be disputed that a contract without consideration is not a
contract at all. The reference made to ‘transactions without consideration’ In Schedule I
does not imply that a void contract is being made valid, by GST laws. It can be argued
that transactions listed in Schedule I, are not contracts at all owing to lack of
consideration in terms of the Contract Laws. Even though they are not contracts, by
legal fiction, flowing from section 7(1)(c) read with Schedule I, they will be nevertheless
regarded as a ‘supply’ and made taxable. As can be seen from the above, in all other
clauses of section 7(1), supply exists within a valid contract, but in select circumstances
supply is imputed by legal fiction in the absence of a contract. It is therefore important
not to extrapolate this legal fiction beyond the specific cases to which the law imputes
this fiction.
The activities specified in Schedule I are analysed in the ensuing paragraphs:
1. Permanent transfer or disposal of business assets where input tax credit has
been availed on such assets.
(a) Of the 8 forms of supply, the only forms that qualify as a supply, under this
category are ‘transfer’ and ‘disposal’. Other 6 forms of supply listed in section
7(1)(a) would not stand categorised in this paragraph, given that there is (a) an
element of a consideration that is intrinsic to the form, such as the case of a
sale or barter or exchange, or (b) there is no business asset that is
permanently transferred such as in the case of a licence or rental or lease, or
any other service for that matter.
(b) Ordinarily, there can be no permanent transfer in case of goods sent for job
work. The aspect of sending goods on job work is not a supply, has been
clarified vide Circular No.38/12/2018 dated 26.03.2018. However, where a
registered person has purchased any moulds, tools, etc. and has sent the
same to the job worker, there is a good chance that the goods are never
returned, given that the time limits specified in Section 143 for good sent for job
work does not apply to moulds, tools and other specified goods.
(c) It may be noted that this paragraph conjoins two disjointed activities/
transactions viz., (a) permanent transfer; and (b) disposal of business assets
where input tax credit has been availed on such assets. There is a school of
thought that permanent transfer without consideration is in itself an item
covered under Schedule I whether or not any credit is claimed on such asset.
However, there is a second school of thought, not widely followed, who strongly
believe that both permanent transfer and disposal have to be in respect of a
business asset on which credit is availed. For instance, where a capital asset
has been procured, say, by a distillery for the purpose of manufacture of
alcoholic beverages, no input tax credit would have been availed on such
asset. Accordingly, there would be no output tax payable if the asset is
permanently transferred to another entity (unrelated), if the transfer is without
consideration, going by the second school of thought. However, if consideration
exists, there can be no escape from levy. Support can be found in the way
relief is granted to the ‘disposal of business assets’. If disposal is anyway one
of the forms of supply, how can disposal be excused where credit is not
availed. This is explained when credit is reversed in case of disposal (as
contemplated in section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act), there cannot be a levy
again by the fiction in Schedule I on this disposal. Now, if Proprietor were to
take away a car used in the business, can tax incidence be excused simply
because credit was not allowed originally. Care must be take to identify how
the disjointed expression in schedule I is understood
(d) In the above context, business asset need not always be goods, it can as well
be service that could be permanently transferred which could attract the above
provisions Eg: unexpired right in a business franchise permanently transferred
to another person.
(e) While the word ‘transfer’ in this entry suggests that there should be another
person who would receive the business assets, there is no requirement of
another person in the case of ‘disposal’. Therefore, if a business asset on
which credit is claimed has been discarded, the transaction shall be regarded
as a supply.
(f) Business assets procured for the purpose of serving the requirements of
‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, being a statutorily imposed obligation’ may
be contended to be a procurement made in the course or furtherance of
business, and an attempt can be made to avail input tax credit. The issue
would however remain contentious and there are no precedents. However,
there would be no escape from the levy of tax on the transaction, if the asset is
permanently transferred. The treatment would be no different even in the case
of a donation.
(g) ADVANCE RULING ON THE CAPTIONED MATTER: AAR, MAHARASHTRA
vs. CMS Info Systems Ltd.- “Whether disposal of scrap vehicles for
consideration is a sale and section 7 explaining expression 'supply' covers
supply of goods such as sale or disposal made for a consideration and it
further, says that supply has to be in course or furtherance of business - Held,
yes - Applicant was engaged in business of having a cash management
network involving transportation of cash - Disposal of cash carrying vans was a
transaction in connection with or incidental or ancillary to business of having a
cash management network - As and when vehicles became scrap, they had to
be disposed of and proceeds therefrom to be identified as income for business
which was reflected in profit and loss account of business - Thus, buying new
assets and discarding old and unusable assets was an activity in course of
carrying on business - Whether therefore, supply of motor vehicles as scrap
after its usage was an activity of 'supply' in course or furtherance of business
and such transaction would attract GST - Held, yes”
2. Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between
distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or
furtherance of business:
Provided that gifts not exceeding fifty thousand rupees in value in a financial
year by an employer to an employee shall not be treated as supply of goods
or services or both
(a) The deemed supplies covered in this paragraph are based on a relationship
between the supplier and recipient. The relationship covered under this
paragraph as related persons defined by way of an explanation to Section 15
and distinct persons in terms of Section 25(4) and 25(5) of the Act.
(b) Transactions with distinct persons are normally without consideration since
they are part of the same entity located in different geographies, unless the
accounting system is so sophisticated or so devised, that it treats the locations
in each State as a separate / independent entity even for book-keeping
purposes and effects payments in monetary terms. Let us take instances of
transactions between distinct persons that are not traceable in the books of
account, but requires attention from the perspective of this paragraph in the
Schedule:
i. Stock transfers e.g., transfer of sub-assemblies, semi-finished goods or
finished goods;
ii. Transfer of new or used capital goods/fixed assets – including movement
of laptops when employees are transferred from one location to another;
iii. Bill-to ship-to transactions wherein the vendor issues the invoice to the
corporate office and ships the goods to the branch office;
iv. Centralised management function like Board of Directors, Finance,
Accounts, HR, Legal, procurement functions and other corporate functions
at one location say corporate office and the entity having multiple
registrations in various states results in supply of management services by
the corporate office to distinct persons;
v. A transaction of sale of goods from one registration and providing after
sales support or warranty services/replacement services by another
registration of the same entity;
SI Issue Clarification
No.
1 Whether a DCA falls As already clarified vide circular No.
under the ambit of 57/31/2018-GST dated 4th September,
agent under Para 3 of 2018, whether or not the DCA will fall
Schedule I of the under the ambit of agent under Para 3
CGST Act? of Schedule I of the CGST Act
depends on the following possible
scenarios:
for supply of goods is issued by the
supplier to the customer, either himself
or through DCA, the DCA does not fall
under the ambit of agent.
where the invoice for supply of goods
is issued by the DCA in his own name,
the DCA would fall under the ambit of
agent.
2 Whether the In such a scenario following activities
temporary short-term are taking place:
transaction-based 1. Supply of goods from supplier
loan extended by the (principal) to recipient;
DCA to the recipient
(buyer), for which 2. Supply of agency services from DCA
interest is charged by to the supplier or the recipient or both;
the DCA, is to be 3. Supply of extension of loan services
included in the value by the DCA to the recipient.
of goods being
supplied by the
supplier (principal) It is clarified that in cases where the
where DCA is not an DCA is not an agent under Para 3 of
agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, the
Schedule I of the temporary short-term transaction-
CGST Act? based loan being provided by DCA to
the buyer is a supply of service by the
DCA to the recipient on Principal to
Principal basis and is an independent
supply.
Therefore, the interest being charged
by the DCA would not form part of the
value of supply of goods supplied (to
the buyer) by the supplier. It may be
noted that vide notification No.
12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th
June 2017 (S. No. 27), services by way
of extending deposits, loans or
advances in so far as the consideration
is represented by way of interest or
discount (other than interest involved
in credit card services) has been
exempted.
3 Where DCA is an In such a scenario following activities
agent under Para 3 of are taking place: 1. Supply of goods by
Schedule I of the the supplier (principal) to the DCA; 2.
CGST Act and makes Further supply of goods by the DCA to
payment to the the recipient; 3. Supply of agency
principal on behalf of services by the DCA to the supplier or
the buyer and the recipient or both; 4. Extension of
charges interest to credit by the DCA to the recipient.
the buyer for delayed It is clarified that in cases where the
payment along with DCA is an agent under Para 3 of
the value of goods Schedule I of the CGST Act, the
being supplied, temporary short-term transaction-
whether the interest based credit being provided by DCA to
will form a part of the the buyer no longer retains its
value of supply of character of an independent supply
goods also or not? and is subsumed in the supply of the
goods by the DCA to the recipient. It is
specifies ‘what is’ and ‘what is not’ to be treated as a transaction of supply of goods or a
transaction of supply of service. So understood, one can list out 18 classes of
transactions enlisted Schedule II of which 5 classes of transactions are listed out as
supply of goods while 13 others would tantamount to supply of services. On a careful
consideration of the relevant clauses, it can be noticed that all the 6 classes of
transactions listed out in Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India are covered within
the scope and ambit of Schedule II. While 2 transactions, out of the 6, are treated as
supply of goods, the other 4 are deemed to be supply of services.
Importantly, paragraph 6 (a) relating to works contracts (as defined in Section 2(119)) is
treated as a composite supply, of services. However, Section 2(119) has 14 distinct
words, all of which are required to be read in conjunction with the words “immovable
property”. Contracts relating to construction of immovable property are specifically
covered in paragraph 5(b) of Schedule II. Therefore, all works contracts other than
those relating to construction of immovable property would amount to composite supply
in terms of Section 2(30) read with Section 8.
It is important for one to understand that what is specified/listed in Schedule II not only
provides clarity but also what has to be treated as supply of goods or supply of
services.
Transactions listed out in schedule II DO NOT enlarge scope of supply as defined under
Section 7(1) of the Act. By shifting the ‘placement’ of schedule II from clause (d) of
section 7(1) to a separate section 7(1A), it is made clear that firstly, a transaction must
already be determined to be ‘supply’ and then, for the limited purposes of ‘treatment’ by
fiction, entries in schedule II must be referred. This amendment was introduced with
retrospective effect from 1 Jul 2017 vide CGST Amendment Act 2018.
It is not that schedule II is exhaustive. But where it is listed, then those transactions will
receive the ‘treatment’ as specified. Transactions involving ‘goods’ if specified in
schedule II to be treated as supply of ‘services’ then, all provisions of GST law that is
applicable to supply of services must be extended (without exception) to this transaction
even though it involves goods.
It is important to understand the intent of the legislature. For example, Para 5(a) of
Schedule II reads “renting of immovable property”. In this situation, how does one
understand the taxability of the transaction where consideration is not involved? The
only way to understand this lacuna is that such transactions that lack consideration
would be relegated to valuation principles, but, importantly, the transaction would be
treated as a supply.
Another instance to consider is para 1(c) of schedule II to CGST Act which deals with
‘hire purchase’ transactions. Although Hire Purchase Act, 1972 has been repealed in
2005. Trade understands hire-purchase versus lease (even though lease is divided into
operating and finance lease). In GST law, all kinds of lease are treated the same –
supply of services. Lease without possession is (legally a) license and license too is
treated as a supply of services. But not hire-purchase. While para 1(b) and 5(f) deal
with lease and license, para 1(c) treats hire-purchase as a supply of goods. Invoice for
goods delivered under a hire-purchase will follow time and place of supply provisions
applicable to goods and not to services.
This presents an anomaly which is explain in the illustration below:
Let’s start with simple operating lease arrangement where goods, say, electricity
generator whose normal sale price is Rs.1,00,000 are lying in stock at Puri, Orissa to
customer-site situated in Bhilai, Chattisgarh;
Supplier is registered in Orissa and Recipient-customer is registered in Chattisgarh;
Supplier makes an inter-State supply and issues invoice for Rs.12,000. This is the lease
rental invoice of first month of a 10-month lease including interest built into this lease
rental amount;
Goods travel from Puri to Bhilai and is clearly an inter-State movement of goods and
IGST has been charged on the invoice;
At the end of first month, Recipient-customer does NOT return the generator by
transport from Bhilai back to Puri. It is retained in Bhilai to be used in the second month;
So, the question to consider is, whether 10-month lease agreement, is one agreement
with 10 instalment to pay or is it 10 monthly agreements contained in one document;
Quick answer that comes to mind is that it is ‘one agreement with 10 installments to
pay’. But it is well understood that time of supply does not get deferred simply because
payment is collected in installments. And if it is one agreement to supply, then it is one
supply and therefore, has one time of supply which is the first day of the first month. By
this reasoning, entire GST at, say, 18% on Rs.1,20,000 (Rs.12,000 x 10 installments)
will be payable in first month (within due date permitted);
On a more careful consideration of that question, it becomes clear that this lease
(exceptions to be examined) is a ‘month-to-month’ agreement. And as all monthly
agreements are identical, it is executed in a single document. Now there are 10
supplies and will have 10 times of supply and hence, GST is payable on Rs.12,000 at
18% each month;
Now, that it is clear that lease is a month-to-month arrangement, the next question to
consider is whether the lease rental invoice for the second month, will be inter-State (as
the first month) or will it become an intra-State supply;
Recollect that generator is lying with the Recipient-customer at Bhilai at the end of first
month and will be continued to be used in second month without actually being return to
Puri and then received back to Bhilai;
Now, location of supplier of services is defined in IGST Act (and also in CGST Act) but
location of supplier of goods is NOT defined. To examine location of supplier of goods,
reference must be had to ‘place of business’ as defined in section 2(85) of CGST Act
which provides that it will be (i) place where business is ordinarily carried on, in this
case, it would be Puri or (ii) place where goods are stored, in this case, it would be
Bhilai or (iii) place from where supplies are made or supplies are received or (iv) place
where books are maintained or (v) place of an agent appointed to carry on business.
Applying the above 5 tests, it appears (ii) would be the appropriate test and hence
location of goods in second month would be place of business;
Business of lease is not concluded every month. It has already been concluded at the
start of first month. Hence, the first limb in the definition is non-operative in the present
case and second limb in the definition comes into operation to decide the ‘location of
supplier of goods’;
As a result, location of supplier of goods will be the location of the goods for the supply
by way of lease in the second month. Goods being located in Bhilai will be an intra-
State supply by the Supplier who is located in Puri;
It is for this reason, that schedule II contains para 1(b) (and even 5(f) in case of license)
that the supply of goods by way of lease will be ‘treated’ as supply of services;
When transaction is treated as supply of services, then location of goods becomes
irrelevant and location of supplier of services (as defined in section 2(15) of IGST Act
and 2(71) of CGST Act) will determine all months to be inter-State supplies; and
Supplier situated in Puri, Orissa will NOT be required to take registration in every State
where customers’ sites are located in lease or license supplies.
Now, the above concept DOES NOT apply to hire-purchase because para 1(c) states
that hire-purchase will be treated as supply of goods. The new question that arises
here, is whether the Supplier under hire-purchase arrangements will be liable to take
registration in all States where customers’ sites are located.
Experts opine that in hire-purchase, it is not a month-to-month hire-purchase but a
single agreement for the entire duration and each periodic payment is only an
instalment, therefore there is only one supply with one time of supply and tax is payable
at the rate applicable to those goods and on ENTIRE hire-purchase price. There is a
pressing need for a circular on this aspect of difference between HP and Lease. FAQs
on BFSI released by Government only refers to the aspect that exemption from tax on
interest is NOT AVAILABLE to finance lease (which can be extended to HP also) even
though each periodic payment clearly contains an element of ‘interest’ (FAQ 47).
Reason for the divergent treatment of HP compared to Lease provided by experts is
stated to be in the definition of ‘hire-purchase agreement’ from AS 19 (which carries the
essence from definition in section 2(c) of the (now repealed) HP Act). It states that HP
is a single agreement for the entire duration where (i) possession is already passed (ii)
(f) Certain supplies will be neither a supply of goods, nor a supply of services: The
law lists down matters which shall not be considered as ‘supply’ for GST by way of
Schedule III. Since these are transactions that are not regarded as ‘supply’ under the
GST Laws, there is no requirement to report the inward / outward supply of such
activities in the returns.
(g) To be notified: The Government has vested itself powers to notify ‘activities or other
transactions’ which shall neither be treated as supply of goods nor a supply of services
in terms of section 7(2). Such notification would be issued from time to time based on
the recommendations of the GST Council.
• The Government has notified the following supplies in this regard:
Services by way of any activity in relation to a function entrusted to Panchayat
under Article 243G of the Constitution
(Inserted vide Notification No. 14/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017)
• The inter-State movement of goods like movement of various modes of
conveyance, between ‘distinct persons’ as explained in this Chapter, including
trains, buses, trucks, tankers, trailers, vessels, containers & aircrafts, carrying
goods or passengers or both, or for repairs and maintenance, would also not be
regarded as supplies except in cases where such movement is for further supply of
the same conveyance (Clarified vide Circular No. 1/1/2017-IGST dated
07.07.2017).
• The above logic would apply to the issue pertaining to inter-State movement of jigs,
tools and spares, and all goods on wheels like cranes, except in cases where
movement of such goods is for further supply of the same goods, and consequently
no IGST would be applicable on such movements (Clarified vide Circular No.
21/21/2017-GST dated 22.11.2017).
(h) The Government is also empowered to specify what shall be treated as a supply of
goods / services, as is the function of Schedule II, based on the recommendation of the
GST Council, by specifying that a supply is to be treated as:
i) A supply of goods and not a supply of service;
ii) A supply of service and not a supply of goods.
(i) In summary, supply can be understood as follows:
(j) The GST Law also treats certain transactions to be supplies by way of a deeming fiction
imposed in the statute.
(a) The law expressly uses the phrase ‘deemed supply’ in Section 19(3) and 19(6) in
respect of inputs/capital goods sent to a job worker but are not returned within the
time period of 1 year/ 3 years permitted for their return.
(b) The bill-to-ship-to transactions wherein the supply is deemed to have been made to
the person to whom the invoice is issued, imposes an intrinsic condition that such
person who receives the invoice should in turn issue an invoice to the recipient
unless the transaction demands a treatment otherwise. For instance, where an
order is placed on a vendor based on an order received from a customer, the
registered person may request the vendor to directly ship the goods to the
customer. In this case, although there is a single movement of goods, there is a
dual change of title to goods, and therefore, there would be 2 supplies. However,
the other limb of the transaction would get independently tested for supply under
Section 7.
Statutory Provisions
8. Tax liability on composite and mixed supplies
The tax liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following
manner, namely: —
(a) a composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a
principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply; and
(b) a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies shall be treated as a supply
of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax.
(i) These are referred to as composite supply of goods and / or services. It shall be
deemed to be a supply of those goods or services, which constitutes the principal
supply therein. Only where all of the conditions specified for a supply of a
combination of goods and/or services to be treated as a composite supply are
satisfied, the supply can be regarded as a composite supply. The conditions are as
follows:
1. The supply must be made by a taxable person: This condition presumes that
composite supplies can only be effected by a taxable person.
2. The supply must comprise 2 / more taxable supplies: The law merely specifies
that the supplies included within a composite supply must contain 2 or more
taxable supplies. A question may then arise as to what would be the treatment
in case of a supply that fulfils all the conditions, but involves an exempt supply
– say, purchase of fresh vegetables from a store which offers home delivery for
an added charge. Fresh vegetables are exempt from tax, whereas the service
of home delivery would attract tax. No clarification has been issued in this
regard. However, on a plain reading of the provision, it appears that this
condition would not be satisfied where the composite supply involves an
exempt supply. One could argue that taxable supply includes exempt by virtue
of the definition of taxable supply under Section 2(108).
3. The goods and / or services involved in the supply must be naturally bundled:
The concept of natural bundling needs to be examined on a case to case basis.
What is naturally bundled in one set-up may not be regarded as naturally
bundled in another situation. For instance, stay with breakfast is naturally
bundled in the hotel industry, while the supply of lunch and dinner, even if they
form part of the same invoice, may not be considered as naturally bundled
supplies along with room rent.
4. They must be supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course
of business: Where certain supplies could be naturally bundled, it is essential
that they are so supplied in the ordinary course of business of the taxable
person. For instance, it is possible to consider the supply of a water purifier
along with the first-time installation service as a naturally bundled supply.
However, if a supplier of water purifiers does not ordinarily provide the
installation service, and arranges for a person to provide the installation service
in the case of an important business customer, the supply would not satisfy the
said condition.
5. Only one of the supplies involved must qualify as the principal supply: In
every composite supply, there must be only one principal supply. Where a
conflict between the various components of the supply, as to which of those
qualify as the principal supply, cannot be resolved and results in multiple
predominant supplies, the supply cannot be regarded as a composite supply.
(a) A principal supply is defined u/s 2(90) to mean the predominant element of
a composite supply to which any other supply forming part of that
composite supply is ancillary.
(b) Therefore, mere identification of the predominant element would not
suffice, and it must be ascertained that all other supplies composed in the
composite supply are ancillary to that predominant element of the supply.
(c) Consider the case of a supply of dining table with chairs. There would
normally be no issue in this regard if both the components are made of the
same material. However, if the dining table is made of granite, while the
chairs are made of superior quality wood, there would be a conflict.
Normally, the dining table would be regarded as the principal supply to
which the supply of chairs is ancillary. However, in this case, it may not be
possible to determine which of the two make the principal supply.
Where any of the aforesaid conditions are not satisfied, the transaction cannot
be treated as a composite supply.
(ii) The matters such as time of supply, invoicing, place of supply, value of supply, rate
of tax applicable to the supply, etc. shall all be determined in respect of the
principal supply alone, since the entire supply shall be deemed to be a supply of
the principal supply alone.
(iii) Some Illustrations and cases of composite supplies have been discussed in the
following paragraphs:
Illustration (provided in Section 2(27)): Where goods are packed, and
transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport
and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is the principal
supply. This implies that the supply will be taxed wholly as supply of goods.
Para 5(3) of Circular No.32/06/2018-GST dated 12.02.2018 clarifies that “food
supplied to the in-patients as advised by the doctor/nutritionists is a part of
composite supply of health care and not separately taxable”. It also goes on
to clarify further that supplies of food by hospital to patients (not admitted) or
their attendants or visitors are taxable.
Circular No.11/11/2017-GST dated 20.10.2017 has provided clarification on
treatment of printing contracts. It is clarified that:
In the case of printing of books, pamphlets, brochures, annual reports, and
the like, where only content is supplied by the publisher or the person who
owns the usage rights to the intangible inputs while the physical inputs
including paper used for printing belong to the printer, supply of printing of
the content supplied by the recipient of supply is the principal supply.
deemed to be a supply of that goods or services therein, which are liable to tax at
the highest rate of GST. The characteristics of a mixed supply is as follows:
1. It involves 2 / more individual supplies: It may be noted that the term used in
the case of mixed supply is “individual supplies” as against “taxable supplies”.
Therefore, a mixed supply can include both taxable and non-taxable supplies
2. It is made by a taxable person;
3. The supply is made for a single price: The fact that a composite supply does
not include this condition merits consideration. Where a supply of 2 / more
goods or services is made for different prices, the supplies cannot be regarded
as mixed supplies.
4. The supply does not constitute a composite supply: The expression
“constitute” has a large ambit to include cases where the supply results in a
composite supply, as well as a case where some of the components together
make a composite supply, whereas the bundle together would make a mixed
supply. While the condition as such is not explicit, given that there is no
provision for treatment of a bundled supply where only some components
together qualify as a composite supply, it may be safe to interpret that a mixed
supply is one which is not regarded as a composite supply.
(ii) The matters such as time of supply, invoicing, place of supply, value of supply, rate
of tax applicable to the supply, etc. shall all be determined in respect of that supply
which attracts the highest rate of tax. However, the law remains silent on what is
the treatment required to be undertaken where more than one component is
subjected to the highest rate of tax. For instance, consider a case where a
commercial complex is let out for a consideration of monthly rentals, and the owner
of the complex also supplies parking lots to those tenants who opt for the facility.
While both the supplies attract tax @ 18%, the law does not prescribe for treatment
of the transaction as that of only one of the two supplies.
(iii) Some Illustrations and cases of mixed supplies have been discussed in the
following paragraphs:
Illustration (provided in Section 2(66)): A supply of a package consisting of
canned foods, sweets, chocolates, cakes, dry fruits, aerated drink and fruit
juices when supplied for a single price is a mixed supply. Each of these items
can be supplied separately and is not dependent on any other. It shall not be a
mixed supply if these items are supplied separately. This implies that the
supply will be taxed wholly as supply of those goods which are liable to
the highest rate of GST.
Other examples: If a tooth paste (say for instance it is liable to GST at 12%) is
bundled along with a tooth brush (say for instance it is liable to GST at 18%)
and is sold as a single unit for a single price, it would be reckoned as a mixed
supply. This would therefore be liable to GST at 18% (higher of 12% or 18%
applicable to each of the goods therein).
(c) While there are no infallible tests for such determination, the following guiding principles
could be adopted to determine whether a supply would be a composite supply or a
mixed supply. However, every supply should be independently analysed.
Description Composite Mixed Supply
Supply
Naturally bundled Yes No
Each supply available for supply individually No Yes / No
One is predominant supply for recipient Yes Yes / No
Other supply(ies) are ancillary or they are Yes No
received because of predominant supply
Each supply priced separately Yes / No No
Supplied together Yes Yes
All supplies can be goods Yes Yes
All supplies can be services Yes Yes
A combination of one / more goods and one / Yes Yes
more services
determined undersection 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent., as
may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and
collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable
person.
(2) The central tax on the supply of petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit
(commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel shall be levied with
effect from such date as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations
of the Council.
(3) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification,
specify categories of supply of goods or services or both, the tax on which shall be
paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient of such goods or services or both and
all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable
for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both
(4) The central tax in respect of the supply of taxable goods or services or both by a
supplier, who is not registered, to a registered person shall be paid by such person
on reverse charge basis as the recipient and all the provisions of this Act shall apply
to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the
supply of such goods or services or both.
(5) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification,
specify categories of services the tax on intra-State supplies of which shall be paid
by the electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it, and all
the provisions of this Act shall apply to such electronic commerce operator as if he is
the supplier liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such services:
Provided that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical
presence in the taxable territory, any person representing such electronic commerce
operator for any purpose in the taxable territory shall be liable to pay tax:
Provided further that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a
physical presence in the taxable territory and also, he does not have a representative
in the said territory, such electronic commerce operator shall appoint a person in the
taxable territory for the purpose of paying tax and such person shall be liable to pay
tax.
Statutory Provisions- Effective from 1st February 2019 vide The Central Goods &
Services Tax Amendment Act,2018
undersection 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent., as may be notified
by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such
manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person.
(2) The central tax on the supply of petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit
(commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel shall be levied with
effect from such date as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of
the Council.
(3) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify
categories of supply of goods or services or both, the tax on which shall be paid on
reverse charge basis by the recipient of such goods or services or both and all the
provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying
the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both
(4) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification,
specify a class of registered persons who shall, in respect of supply of specified
categories of goods or services or both received from an unregistered supplier,
pay the tax on reverse charge basis as the recipient of such supply of goods or
services or both, and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as
if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to such supply of goods or
services or both.
(5) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify
categories of services the tax on intra-State supplies of which shall be paid by the
electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it, and all the
provisions of this Act shall apply to such electronic commerce operator as if he is the
supplier liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such services:
Provided that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical
presence in the taxable territory, any person representing such electronic commerce
operator for any purpose in the taxable territory shall be liable to pay tax:
Provided further that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical
presence in the taxable territory and also, he does not have a representative in the said
territory, such electronic commerce operator shall appoint a person in the taxable
territory for the purpose of paying tax and such person shall be liable to pay tax.
(i) Taxable supply: Every taxable supply will be subjected to GST. A taxable supply refers
to any supply of goods or services or both, which qualifies as a supply in terms of
Section 7. The exception to this rule would be all supplies that the levy Section forgoes
to tax, as also all those supplies that have been notified to be nil-rated or exempted
from tax. The provisions imposing GST are phrased in such a manner so as to exclude
the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption from the scope of levy itself.
However, the law specifies certain other goods whereby the levy of GST has been
deferred until such time the goods are notified in this regard to be taxable supplies (by
the Government, based on the recommendation of the GST Council):
(1) petroleum crude
(2) high speed diesel
(3) motor spirit (commonly known as petrol)
(4) natural gas and
(5) aviation turbine fuel
(ii) Tax payable: The nature of tax would depend upon the nature of supply, viz., inter-
State supplies will be liable to IGST and intra-State supplies will be liable to CGST and
SGST/UTGST (i.e., UTGST in case intra-State supplies within a particular Union
Territory). Every intra-State supply will attract CGST as well as SGST, as follows:
(1) Imposition of CGST by the Union Government of India
(2) Imposition of SGST by the respective State Government or (in case of UTGST, by
the Central Government through the appointed Administrator)
(iii) Tax shall be payable by a ‘taxable person’: The tax shall be payable by a ‘taxable
person’ i.e., a person who is liable to obtain registration, or a person who has obtained
registration. Please note that there can be multiple taxable persons for a single person.
It comprises separate establishments of persons registered or liable to be registered
under sections 22 or section 24 of the CGST Act. Please refer to the discussion under
Section 25 for a thorough understanding of this concept. Under the GST law, the person
liable to pay the tax levied on a supply under the Statute would be one of the following:
(1) The supplier, in terms of Section 9(1)–Referred to as forward charge. This is
ordinarily applicable in case of all supplies unless the supplies qualify under the
other two categories, i.e., this would be the residual category of supply wherein the
supplier would be liable to pay tax. (In this regard, it must be noted that the term
‘supplier’ is attributed to an establishment, and not to the PAN as a whole.
Therefore, if the supply is effected from an establishment in Karnataka, the
establishment of the same entity located in say Delhi, cannot discharge the
liabilities);
(2) The recipient – Referred to as tax under reverse charge mechanism. In such a
case, all the provisions of the Act as are applicable to the supplier in a normal case,
would apply to the recipient of supply (being a taxable person, and not the PAN as
explained above). A supply would be subjected to tax in the hands of the recipient
only in the following cases:
1. Notified supplies under Section 9(3): The supply of goods or services is notified
as a supply liable to tax in the hands of the recipient vide Notification No.
4/2017-Central Tax (Rate) in case of goods and Notification No. 13/ 2017-
Central Tax (Rate) in case of services, as amended from time to time. Please
note that the supplier discharging this liability would not render the liability
discharged, since the law imposes the obligation on the recipient. The recipient
of supply would nevertheless be liable to discharge the taxes, and the relief
available to the supplier would be only by way of an application for refund;
2. Supplies received from unregistered persons under Section 9(4): The supply is
an inward supply of goods and / or services effected by a registered person
from an unregistered supplier. In this regard, it may be noted that the levy
under this clause applies (as amended by CGST Amendment Act) only in
respect of (a) ‘class of registered persons’ and (b) ‘categories of goods or
services’, by a notification. W.e.f. 1st April, 2019, the Central Government vide
Notification No. 07/2019-Central Tax (Rate) notified the following categories of
goods or services or both, in respect of which registered person shall pay tax
on reverse charge basis as recipient of such goods or services or both:-
Sl. Category of supply of goods and services Recipient
No. of goods
and
services
1. Supply of such goods and services or both [other than Promoter
services by way of grant of development rights, long
term lease of land (against upfront payment in the form
of premium, salami, development charges etc.) or FSI
(including additional FSI)] which constitute the shortfall
from the minimum value of goods or services or both
required to be purchased by a promoter for construction
of project, in a financial year (or part of the financial
year till the date of issuance of completion certificate or
first occupation, whichever is earlier) as prescribed in
notification No. 11/ 2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th
June, 2017, at items (i), (ia), (ib), (ic) and (id) against
serial number 3 in the Table, published in Gazette of
(Rate) dated
June 28, 2017
2401 Tobacco leaves Agriculturist Any registered 4/2017-Central
person Tax (Rate) dated
June 28, 2017
and 4/2017-
Integrated Tax
(Rate) dated
June 28, 2017
5004 to 5006 Silk yarn Any person who Any registered 4/2017-Central
manufactures person Tax (Rate) dated
silk yarn from June 28, 2017
raw silk or silk and 4/2017-
worm cocoons Integrated Tax
for supply of silk (Rate) dated
yarn June 28, 2017
- Supply of lottery State Lottery 4/2017-Central
Government, distributor or Tax (Rate) dated
Union Territory selling agent. June 28, 2017
or any local and 4/2017-
authority Integrated Tax
(Rate) dated
June 28, 2017
Any Chapter Used vehicles, Central Any registered 36/2017-Central
seized and Government, person Tax (Rate) dated
confiscated State October 13,
goods, old and Government, 2017
used goods, Union territory or
waste and scrap a local authority
Any Chapter Priority Sector Any registered Any registered 11/2018–Central
Lending person person Tax (Rate) dated
Certificate May 28, 2018
Central Government on the recommendation of the Council has notified the category of supply
of services on which GST shall be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis (Notification
No. 13/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time)
Sl. Category of Supply of Services Supplier Recipient of Service
No. of service
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Supply of Services by a goods Goods (a) Any factory registered under
transport agency (GTA) who has Transport or governed by the
input service
in the same
line of
business
16 Services of lending of securities Lender i.e. a Borrower i.e. a person who
under Securities Lending Scheme, person who borrows the securities under the
1997 (“Scheme”) of Securities and deposits the Scheme through an approved
Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), Securities intermediary of SEBI.”
as amended. registered in
his name or in
the name of
any other
person duly
authorised on
his behalf with
an approved
intermediary
for the
purpose of
lending under
the Scheme
of SEBI
In addition to the above list given under Central Tax- Rate, following additional category
of supply of services is listed under Notification No. 10/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) on
which GST shall be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis:-
Sl. Category of Supply of Services Supplier Recipient of Service
No. of service
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Any service supplied by any Any person Any person located in the taxable
person who is located in a non- located in a territory other than non-taxable
taxable territory to any person non-taxable online recipient.
other than non-taxable online territory
recipient
10 Services supplied by a person A person Importer, as defined in clause (26)
located in non- taxable territory by located in of section 2 of the Customs Act,
way of transportation of goods by non-taxable 1962(52 of 1962), located in the
a vessel from a place outside territory taxable territory.
India up to the customs station of
clearance in India
ANALYSIS:-
• No partial reverse charge will be applicable under GST. 100% tax will be paid by
the recipient if reverse charge mechanism applies.
• All taxpayers required to pay tax under reverse charge have to mandatorily obtain
registration and the threshold exemption is not applicable on them.
• Payment of taxes under Reverse Charge cannot be made with utilisation of Input
Tax Credit and has to be made in Cash.
• The recipient can take the credit of tax paid on inward supplies liable to reverse
charge once the recipient makes payment of tax in cash.
(iv) The e-commerce operator, in terms of Section 9(5): The Government is empowered to
notify categories of services wherein the person responsible for payment of taxes would
nether be the supplier nor the recipient of supply, but the e-commerce operator through
which the supply is effected. It is important to note that, in case of such supplies, the e-
commerce operator is neither the supplier nor does it receive the services. The e-
commerce operator is merely the person who person who owns, operates or manages
digital or electronic facility or platform for e-commerce purposes. Under the erstwhile
service tax law, the e-commerce operator in such an arrangement was referred to as an
‘aggregator’.
1. The Government has notified certain services in this regard vide Notification No.
17/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended from time to time, including services by
way of transportation of passengers by a radio-taxi, motor cab, maxi cab and motor
cycle, etc.); accommodation in hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites;
services by way of housekeeping, such as plumbing, carpeting etc.
2. Where the e-commerce does not have a physical presence in the taxable territory,
any person representing his in the taxable territory would be liable to pay the taxes.
If no such representative exists, the e-commerce operator is liable to appoint such
a person in order to discharge this obligation.
3. All other provisions of the Act will apply to the e-commerce operator or his
representative (as the case may be) in respect of such services, as if he is the
supplier liable to pay tax on the services.
4. In this regard it may be noted that liability to pay tax on the supply by the e-
commerce operator is not another provision imposing tax on the reverse charge
basis. Reference to the definition of reverse charge in section 2(98) makes it clear
that reverse charge is limited to tax payable under section 9(3) and 9(4). It is very
important to note that the language employed in Section 9(5) makes it clear that the
liability to pay tax on the supply is placed on the e-commerce operator, “as if” the e-
commerce operator were the “supplier liable to tax”. The marked departure of the
language from that used in case of the reverse charge provisions suggests that:
(a) The tax that is applicable on the supply is to be paid by the e-commerce
operator ‘” as if” such e-commerce operator was the supplier liable to tax. The
provisions require the e-commerce operator to step into the shoes of the actual
supplier, for the limited purpose of discharging his liability, and the supply by
the e-commerce operator to the actual supplier (facilitation services,
commission services or by any service inter se) will be taxable separately, in
the hands of the e-commerce operator as a supplier of service to the actual
supplier.
(b) The actual supplier is no longer liable to pay any tax. This means that the
suppliers will not be the person liable to pay tax on such services effected
through an e-commerce operator, even if they have obtained registration. This
is clear not only from the exclusion from compulsory registration under section
24(ix) (to such actual suppliers where the e-commerce operator will pay tax
under section 9(5)) but also allowed to enjoy exclusion from registration under
section 23(1)(a) when entire turnover is taxed under 9(5) in the hands of e-
commerce operator. Also refer Notification 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28 Jun 2017 where exception is made for ‘requirement to otherwise register
under section 22” to such actual supplies attracting section 9(5).
Readers may refer to decision of Karnataka AAR in the matter of Opta Cabs Private
Limited as below:
Question raised: Whether the money paid by the customer to the driver of the cab for
the services of the trip is liable to GST and whether the applicant company is liable to
pay GST on this amount
Ruling: The services of transportation of passengers is supplied to the consumers
through the applicant and it shall be deemed that the applicant would be deemed to be
the supplier liable to pay tax in relation to the supply of such service by the taxi operator
- in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 9 of the Central Goods
and Services Tax Act 2017 r/w Notification No. 17/2017- Central Tax (Rate), the
applicant is liable to tax on the amounts billed by him on behalf of the taxi operators for
the service provided in the nature of transportation of passengers through it.
(iv) Rate of tax: The rate of tax will be applicable as specified in the Notification No.
1/2017- Central Tax (Rate) for goods and Notification No. 11/2017- Central Tax (Rate)
for services issued in this regard and read with other Rate Notifications which may be
issued to partially exempt any other goods or services from payment of tax. The rates of
tax contained in these notifications cannot exceed 20% under each limb (i.e., 20%
under CGST Law and 20% under SGST), as amended from time to time. These rates
would be notified based on the recommendation of the GST Council. In order to
determine the applicable rate of tax, the following approach is to be adopted:
scientific meaning of the term. If the tariff headings have technical or scientific
meanings, then that has to be ascertained first before the test of trade understanding.
(xii) If none of the above are available reference may be had to the dictionary meaning or ISI
specifications. Evidence may be gathered on end use or predominant use.
(xiii) In case of the unfinished or incomplete goods, if the unfinished product bears the
essential characteristics of the finished product, its classification shall be same as that
of finished product.
(xiv) If the classification is not ascertained as per above point, one has to look for the nature
of product which is more specific.
(xv) If the classification is still not determinable, one has to look for the ingredient which
gives the article its essential characteristics.
(xvi) It is important to note that in following cases of supply of services, same rate of central
tax as on supply of like goods involving transfer of title in goods would be applicable:
(inducement) present in the supplies (free-marketed as), if yes then we have to get into
valuation of such free supplies to arrive at a transaction value. If not, then the treatment
would be similar to the erstwhile VAT laws, where the supplies are made without any
consideration (monetary/ otherwise). However, where the free supplies are made
between distinct persons or between related persons then such supplies may be
regarded as supply under Schedule I, paragraph 2.
In the erstwhile law, there are multiple transactions which apparently qualify as both
‘sale of goods’ as well as ‘provision of services’. E.g.: license of software, providing a
right to use a brand name, etc. To avoid this situation, GST law clarifies as to whether a
transaction would qualify as a ‘supply of goods’ or as ‘supply of services’ by introducing
a deeming fiction. A transaction of supply under composite contracts would either
qualify as supply of goods or as services, under the GST law (Schedule II of the Act,
concept of composite supply and mixed supply).
The payment of VAT in the hands of the purchaser (registered dealer) on purchase of
goods from an unregistered dealer and the circumstances where the Service Tax is
payable under the reverse charge mechanism in respect of say, advocate services,
import of services, sponsorship services etc. are comparable to the ‘reverse charge
mechanism’ prescribed herein. However, the concept of partial reverse charge is not
continuing in the GST regime, viz., every supply will be liable either to forward charge or
full reverse charge, Further, under erstwhile law, the concept of reverse charge only
exists in relation to services. The GST law, however, permits the supply of goods also
to be subjected to reverse charge.
9.4 Issues and concerns
1. The activity of import of service is subjected to tax, whether or not such import is in the
course or furtherance of business. While the relaxation from obtaining registration is
provided to a ‘non-taxable online recipient’ who imports OIDAR services, relaxation to
other persons who import services for personal use flows from exemption in entry 10(a)
to notification 9/2017-Int (Rate) dated 28 Jun 2017.
2. Although, the word ‘business’ is clearly defined u/s 2(17), the phrase ‘in the course or
furtherance of business’ has not been defined in the Act. The meaning that can be
derived from this phrase is so wide that it can include every activity undertaken by a
business concern, including activities in the course of employment, since employment is
a subset of the activities undertaken in the course of business.
3. A plain reading of the meaning of the terms ‘composite supply’ and ‘mixed supply’
suggests that the concepts pre-suppose a condition that they are effected by taxable
persons. Say in case of a supply effected by a non-taxable person to a registered
person attracting tax under reverse charge, the supply would not be regarded as a
composite supply even where all the conditions are satisfied, and cannot be regarded
as a mixed supply either, for the same reason. Such an understanding would defeat the
very purpose of the legislative intent. Therefore, in case of reverse charge transactions,
the supply must be understood to have been made by the registered person who is the
recipient of supply, i.e., even supplies effected by unregistered persons may be
qualified to be termed ‘composite supply’ or mixed supply’, subject to the normal
conditions which would otherwise apply.
4. While the concept of ‘mixed supplies’ requires that the goods and / or services supplied
in the mixed supply must be supplied for a single price, there is no such requirement in
the case of composite supplies. Therefore, a person effecting a mixed supply of goods
would certainly have an option to strategically alter the bundle of supplies so that all the
goods / services included in the mixed supply would not all be subjected to the highest
rate of tax applicable on the said supplies.
On the other hand, a supplier who effects a composite supply wishes to charge for the
supply of two or more goods or services separately, which otherwise constitute a
composite supply, a question may arise as to whether the rate of tax applicable on all
the supplies would continue to be the rate applicable to the principal supply. Say, a
supplier of air conditioners (taxable @ 28%) who always effects the supply along with
the installation service, now chooses to split the cost of the service in order to tax such
service portion at the rate of 18%. Such a split-up may be questioned, given that there
is no escape from treatment as a composite supply merely because the values are
ascertained separately. Generally, transactions that are intentionally broken up with an
intent to minimise the impact of tax would be subject to scrutiny / valuation.
9.5 FAQs
Q1. In respect of exchange of goods, namely gold watch for restaurant services, will the
transaction be taxable as two different supplies or will it taxable only in the hands of the
main supplier?
Ans. Yes, the transaction of exchange is specifically included in the scope of “supply” under
Section 7. Thus, exchange could be taxable both ways. Provided the person
exchanging gold watch is in the business of selling watches (A contrary view could also
be taken. It depends on the facts of each and every case).
Q2. What are examples of ‘disposals’ as used in ‘supply’?
Ans. “Disposals” could include donation in kind or supplies in a manner other than sale.
Q3. Will a not-for-profit entity be liable to tax (if registered under GST) on any supplies
effected by it – e.g.: sale of assets received as donation?
Ans. Yes, it would be liable to tax on value as may be determined under Section 15, for said
sale of donated assets.
Q4. Is the levy under reverse charge mechanism applicable only to services?
Ans. No, reverse charge applies to supplies of both goods and services by virtue of
Notification No.4/2017-CT(Rate) and Notification No.13/2017-CT(Rate) for goods and
services respectively.
Q5. What will be the implications in case of purchase of goods from unregistered dealers?
Ans. As per Section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 as amended by The CGST Amendment Act,
2018 specified that the tax shall be payable under reverse charge by the specified class
of registered persons, in respect of supply of specified categories of goods.
9.6 MCQs
Q1. As per Section 9, which of the following would attract levy of CGST?
(a) Inter-State supplies, in respect of supplies within the State to SEZ;
(b) Intra-State supplies;
(c) Both of the above;
(d) Either of the above.
Ans. (b) Intra-State supplies
Q2. Which of the following forms of supply are included in Schedule I?
(a) Permanent transfer of business assets on which input tax credit has been
claimed
(b) Agency transactions for services
(c) Barter
(d) None of the above
Ans. (a) Permanent transfer of business assets on which input tax credit has been claimed
Q3. Who can notify a transaction to be supply of ‘goods’ or ‘services’?
(a) CBIT
(b) Central Government on the recommendation of GST Council
(c) GST Council
(d) None of the above
Ans. (b) Central Government on the recommendation of GST Council
Statutory Provisions- Effective from 1st July, 2017 to 31st January, 2019
10. Composition levy
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act but subject to the
provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9, a registered person, whose
aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed fifty lakh rupees,
may opt to pay, in lieu of the tax payable by him, an amount calculated at such rate
as may be prescribed, but not exceeding,–
(i) one per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in case of a
manufacturer,
(ii) two and a half per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in
case of persons engaged in making supplies referred to in clause (b) of
paragraph 6 of Schedule II, and
(iii) half per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in case of other
suppliers,
subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed:
Provided that the Government may, by notification, increase the said limit of fifty lakh
rupees to such higher amount, not exceeding one crore rupees, as may be
recommended by the Council
(2) The registered person shall be eligible to opt under sub-section (1), if: —
(a) he is not engaged in the supply of services other than supplies referred to in
clause (b) of paragraph 6 of Schedule II;
(b) he is not engaged in making any supply of goods which are not leviable to tax
under this Act;
(c) he is not engaged in making any inter-State outward supplies of goods;
(d) he is not engaged in making any supply of goods through an electronic
commerce operator who is required to collect tax at source under section 52; and
(e) he is not a manufacturer of such goods as may be notified by the Government on
the recommendations of the Council:
Provided that where more than one registered persons are having the same
Permanent Account Number (issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961), the registered
person shall not be eligible to opt for the scheme under sub-section (1) unless all
such registered persons opt to pay tax under that sub-section.
(3) The option availed of by a registered person under sub-section (1) shall lapse with
effect from the day on which his aggregate turnover during a financial year exceeds
the limit specified under sub-section (1).
(4) A taxable person to whom the provisions of sub-section (1) apply shall not collect any
tax from the recipient on supplies made by him nor shall he be entitled to any credit of
input tax.
(5) If the proper officer has reasons to believe that a taxable person has paid tax under
sub-section (1) despite not being eligible, such person shall, in addition to any tax that
may be payable by him under any other provisions of this Act, be liable to a penalty
and the provisions of section 73 or section 74 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for
determination of tax and penalty.
Statutory Provisions- Effective from 1st February 2019 vide The Central Goods &
Services Tax Amendment Act,2018
10. Composition levy
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act but subject to the
provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9, a registered person, whose
aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed fifty lakh rupees,
may opt to pay, in lieu of the tax payable by him under sub-section (1) of section
9, an amount calculated at such rate 10as may be prescribed, but not exceeding, –
(i) one per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in case of a
manufacturer,
(ii) two and a half per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in
case of persons engaged in making supplies referred to in clause (b) of
paragraph 6 of Schedule II, and
(ii) half per cent. of the turnover in State or turnover in Union territory in case of other
suppliers,
subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed:
Provided that the Government may, by notification, increase the said limit of fifty lakh
rupees to such higher amount, not exceeding one crore and fifty lakh rupees 11, as
may be recommended by the Council
Provided further that a person who opts to pay tax under clause (a) or clause (b)
or clause (c) may supply services (other than those referred to in clause (b) of
paragraph 6 of Schedule II), of value not exceeding ten per cent. of turnover in a
State or Union territory in the preceding financial year or five lakh rupees,
whichever is higher.
(2) The registered person shall be eligible to opt under sub-section (1), if: —
(a) save as provided in sub-section (1), he is not engaged in the supply of services;
(b) he is not engaged in making any supply of goods which are not leviable to tax
under this Act;
(c) he is not engaged in making any inter-State outward supplies of goods;
(d) he is not engaged in making any supply of goods through an electronic
commerce operator who is required to collect tax at source under section 52; and
(e) he is not a manufacturer of such goods as may be notified by the Government on
the recommendations of the Council
10
Substituted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax Amendment Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2019. Before
substitution, it was read as “in lieu of the tax payable by him, an amount calculated at such rate”
11
Substituted vide The Central Goods and Services Tax Amendment Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2019. Before
substitution, it was read as “one crore rupees”
Provided that where more than one registered persons are having the same
Permanent Account Number (issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961), the registered
person shall not be eligible to opt for the scheme under sub-section (1) unless all
such registered persons opt to pay tax under that sub-section.
(3) The option availed of by a registered person under sub-section (1) shall lapse with
effect from the day on which his aggregate turnover during a financial year exceeds
the limit specified under sub-section (1).
(4) A taxable person to whom the provisions of sub-section (1) apply shall not collect any
tax from the recipient on supplies made by him nor shall he be entitled to any credit of
input tax.
(5) If the proper officer has reasons to believe that a taxable person has paid tax under
sub-section (1) not being eligible, such person shall, in addition to any tax that may be
payable by him under any other provisions of this Act, be liable to a penalty and the
provisions of section 73 or section 74 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for determination
of tax and penalty.
12
Effective date yet to be notified
opt to pay tax under sub-section (1) and sub-section (2), whose aggregate turnover in
the preceding financial year did not exceed fifty lakh rupees, may opt to pay, in lieu of
the tax payable by him under sub-section (1) of section 9, an amount of tax calculated
at such rate as may be prescribed, but not exceeding three per cent. of the turnover in
State or turnover in Union territory, if he is not––
(a) engaged in making any supply of goods or services which are not leviable to tax
under this Act;
(b) engaged in making any inter-State outward supplies of goods or services;
(c) engaged in making any supply of goods or services through an electronic
commerce operator who is required to collect tax at source under section 52;
(d) a manufacturer of such goods or supplier of such services as may be notified by
the Government on the recommendations of the Council; and
(e) a casual taxable person or a non-resident taxable person:
Provided that where more than one registered person are having the same Permanent
Account Number issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the registered person shall
not be eligible to opt for the scheme under this sub-section unless all such registered
persons opt to pay tax under this sub-section.”;
(d) in sub-section (3), after the words, brackets and figure “under sub-section (1)” at both
the places where they occur, the words, brackets, figure and letter “or sub-section
(2A), as the case may be,” shall be inserted.
(e) in sub-section (4), after the words, brackets and figure “of sub-section (1)”, the words,
brackets, figure and letter “or, as the case may be, sub-section (2A)” shall be inserted.
(f) in sub-section (5), after the words, brackets and figure “under sub-section (1)”, the
words, brackets, figure and letter “or sub-section (2A), as the case may be,” shall be
inserted.
(g) after sub-section (5), the following Explanations shall be inserted, namely: —
‘Explanation 1.––For the purposes of computing aggregate turnover of a person for
determining his eligibility to pay tax under this section, the expression “aggregate
turnover” shall include the value of supplies made by such person from the 1st day of
April of a financial year up to the date when he becomes liable for registration under
this Act, but shall not include the value of exempt supply of services provided by way
of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented
by way of interest or discount.
Explanation 2.––For the purposes of determining the tax payable by a person under
this section, the expression “turnover in State or turnover in Union territory” shall not
[one hundred and eighty days] 13 from the day on which such person commences to
pay tax under section 10:
Provided that the said persons shall not be allowed to furnish the declaration in
FORM GST TRAN-1 after the statement in FORM GST ITC-03 has been furnished] 14.
(4) Any person who files an intimation under sub-rule (1) to pay tax under section 10
shall furnish the details of stock, including the inward supply of goods received from
unregistered persons, held by him on the day preceding the date from which he opts
to pay tax under the said section, electronically, in FORM GST CMP-03, on the
common portal, either directly or through a Facilitation Centre notified by the
Commissioner, within a period of [ninety] 15 days from the date on which the option for
composition levy is exercised or within such further period as may be extended by
the Commissioner in this behalf.
(5) Any intimation under sub-rule (1) or sub-rule (3) or [sub-rule (3A)] 16 in respect of any
place of business in any State or Union territory shall be deemed to be an intimation
in respect of all other places of business registered on the same Permanent Account
Number.
13
Substituted for the word [ninety days] vide Notf no. 03/2018- CT dt. 23.01.2018
14
Substituted vide Notf no. 45/2017-CT dt. 13.10.2017
15
Substituted for the word [sixty] with effect from 17.08.2017 vide Notf no. 22/2017 – CT dt. 17.08.2017
16
Inserted vide Notf no. 34/2017 – CT dt. 15.09.2017
(c) the goods held in stock by him have not been purchased from an unregistered
supplier and where purchased, he pays the tax under sub-section (4) of section
9;
(d) he shall pay tax under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 9 on inward
supply of goods or services or both;
(e) he was not engaged in the manufacture of goods as notified under clause (e) of
sub-section (2) of section 10, during the preceding financial year;
(f) he shall mention the words ―composition taxable person, not eligible to collect
tax on supplies‖at the top of the bill of supply issued by him; and
(g) he shall mention the words ―composition taxable person on every notice or
signboard displayed at a prominent place at his principal place of business and
at every additional place or places of business.
(2) The registered person paying tax under section 10 may not file a fresh intimation
every year and he may continue to pay tax under the said section subject to the
provisions of the Act and these rules.
accepting the reply, or denying the option to pay tax under section 10 from the date
of the option or from the date of the event concerning such contravention, as the
case may be.
(6) Every person who has furnished an intimation under sub-rule (2) or filed an
application for withdrawal under sub-rule (3) or a person in respect of whom an order
of withdrawal of option has been passed in FORM GST CMP-07 under sub-rule (5),
may electronically furnish at the common portal, either directly or through a
Facilitation Centre notified by the Commissioner, a statement in FORM GST ITC-01
containing details of the stock of inputs and inputs contained in semi-finished or
finished goods held in stock by him on the date on which the option is withdrawn or
denied, within a period of thirty days from the date from which the option is withdrawn
or from the date of the order passed in FORM GST CMP-07, as the case may be.
(7) Any intimation or application for withdrawal under sub-rule (2) or (3) or denial of the
option to pay tax under section 10 in accordance with sub-rule (5) in respect of any
place of business in any State or Union territory, shall be deemed to be an intimation
in respect of all other places of business registered on the same Permanent Account
Number.
17
Substituted with effect from 01.01.2018 vide Notf no. 03/2018- CT dt. 23.01.2018
18
Substituted with effect from 01.01.2018 vide Notf no. 03/2018- CT dt. 23.01.2018
19
Substituted vide Notf no. 03/2019-CT dt. 29.01.2019 wef 01.02.2019
20
Substituted with effect from 01.01.2018 vide Notf no. 03/2018- CT dt. 23.01.2018
Section Description
Section 9 Levy and collection
Section 2(6) Definition of Aggregate turnover
Section 2(102) Definition of Services
Section 2(78) Definition of Non-taxable supply
Section Description
Section 2(112) Meaning of Turnover in a State
Section 52 Collection of tax at source
10.1 Introduction
This Section provides for a registered person to opt for payment of taxes under a scheme of
composition, the conditions attached thereto and the persons who are entitled, but not
mandated, to make payment of tax under this Scheme. The conditions, restrictions,
procedures and the documentation in respect of this scheme are contained in Chapter II of the
Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 from Rule 3 to Rule 7 (Composition Rules).
10.2 Analysis
Tax payment under this scheme is an option available to the taxable person. This scheme
would be available only to certain eligible persons.
(a) Payment of tax: The composition scheme offers to a registered person, the option to
remit taxes on the turnover as against outward supply-wise payment of taxes. In other
words, the registered person opting to pay tax under the composition scheme needs
only to ascertain the aggregate value of outward taxable supplies, and compute the tax
thereon at a fixed rate, regardless of the actual rate of tax applicable on the said
outward supply. The rate of tax prescribed in this regard is as under:
(i) In case of manufacturers: 1% (0.5% CGST+ 0.5% SGST) of the turnover in the
State/UT (Note: The rate applicable has been reduced from 2% to 1% vide
Notification No. 1/2018-Central Tax dated 23.01.2018 effective 01.01.2018);
(ii) In case of food/restaurant services:5% (2.5% CGST+ 2.5% SGST) of the turnover
in the State/UT (i.e., in case of composite supply of service specified in Entry 6(b)
of Schedule II);
(iii) In case of other suppliers: 1% (0.5% CGST+ 0.5% SGST) of the turnover of
taxable supplies in the State/UT (such as like traders, agents for supply of goods,
etc.)
(b) Eligibility to pay tax under composition scheme: The conditions for eligibility to opt
for payment of tax under the composition scheme is as follows:
(i) Registered persons having an ‘aggregate turnover’ as defined under Section 2(6)
of the Act (i.e., aggregate of turnovers across all States under the same PAN,
including exempt supplies, supplies specified under Schedule I, etc.) does not
exceed the prescribed limit in the preceding financial year will be eligible to opt
for payment of tax under the composition scheme. Please refer to the discussion
(v) Shall not collect tax: Taxable person opting to pay tax under the composition
scheme is prohibited from collecting tax on the outward supplies. Care must be
taken when composition taxable persons are involved in supply of MRP-goods.
MRP includes output tax and selling at MRP violates this condition. The impact is
far more severe as the composition facility gets rejected and full output tax is
liable to be paid but input tax credit (otherwise available) would not have been
availed within the relevant time permitted.
(vi) Not entitled to input tax credit: Taxable person opting to pay tax under the
composition scheme will not be eligible to claim any input tax credits.
However, if the taxable person becomes ineligible to remain under composition
scheme, the taxable person will become entitled to take input tax in respect of
inputs held in stock (as inputs, contained in semi-finished or finished goods) on
the day immediately preceding the date from which he becomes liable to pay tax
under Section 9. (Refer Section 18(1)(c) for the provision. A statement of stock
shall be filed in Form GST ITC-1 within 30 days from the date from which the
option is withdrawn or the order cancelling the composition option is passed).
(vii) The registered person must not be:
1. A manufacturer of such goods as may be notified by the Government
(based on the recommendations of the GST Council), in the year for which
he opts for the scheme, or in the preceding financial year (E.g. Ice cream,
pan masala, tobacco). However, there is no restriction in trading of such
goods, i.e., where the person has not manufactured the goods.
2. A casual taxable person;
3. A non-resident taxable person;
(viii) All the registrations obtained under a single PAN are also mandated to opt for
payment under the composition scheme, i.e., all the registered persons under the
PAN will also be mandated to comply with all the conditions mentioned above,
including the business verticals having separate registrations within the same
State under the same PAN. The scheme would become applicable for all the
registrations and it cannot be applied for select verticals only. E.g.: Say a
company has the following businesses separately registered:
— Sale of mobile devices (Registered in Kerala)
— Franchisee of branded restaurant (Registered in Goa)
The scheme would be applicable for the said 2 units. The company cannot opt for
composition scheme for the registration in Kerala and opt to pay taxes under the
regular scheme for the registration in Goa.
(ix) The scheme will be applicable to all the outward supplies. The option of the
scheme will be qua-person and not qua-class of goods – once opted it will be
applicable for all supplies by effected by the registered person; it must be noted
that a taxable person cannot opt for payment of taxes under composition scheme
for supply of one class of goods and opt for regular scheme of payment of taxes
for supply of other classes of goods or services.
(c) Conditions applicable on a composition supplier: Once a person has opted to pay
tax under the composition scheme, the following conditions would stand attracted:
(i) Every notice or signboard in every registered place of business, displayed at a
prominent place, shall carry the words “Composition taxable person”;
(ii) Every bill of supply issued by the composition suppliers shall carry the
declaration “Composition taxable person, not eligible to collect tax on supplies”
on top of the bill;
(iii) RCM on inward supplies: The composition supplier shall be liable to make
payment at the rate applicable on the supply in respect of every inward supply
liable to tax under the reverse charge mechanism, regardless of the rate of tax
that is applied by him on the outward supplies effected by him. It may be noted
that the value of such inward supplies would not be included in the aggregate
turnover of the composition taxpayer although the liability is discharged by him on
such inward supplies;
(iv) Not entitled to collect tax: The composition taxpayer is prohibited from collecting
any GST / Cess applicable on the outward supplies effected by him. Accordingly,
the recipients of supply would also not be eligible to claim any credits where the
inward supply is from a composition taxpayer;
(v) Not entitled to claim credit of taxes paid: The composition taxpayer is not entitled
to claim credit in respect of taxes paid by him on any of the inward supplies
effected by him, including inward supplies on which he pays tax under reverse
charge mechanism.
(vi) A Composition supplier shall not be entitled to issue any tax invoice. However, to
effect supplies of goods/services the supplier will have to issue “Bill of Supply”
without indicating any tax amount on it.
However, if the composition taxpayer switches over to become a regular taxpayer, he
will be entitled to take input tax in respect of inputs held in stock (as inputs, contained in
semi-finished or finished goods) on the day immediately preceding the date from which
he becomes liable to pay tax under Section 9 (regular taxpayer). Refer the discussion in
Section 18(1)(c) for a better understanding of the provisions.
(d) Important Note: The option to pay tax under the composition scheme will remain valid
so long as the registered persons comply with all of the aforesaid conditions in (b) and
(c) above. The composition suppliers will be treated as any other registered supplier
with effect from the date on which any of the said conditions cease to be complied with.
The composition suppliers would not be entitled to re-enter the scheme until the expiry
of the financial year.
(i) The registered person would be required to file an intimation (suo motu) for
withdrawal from the scheme within 7 days of the non-compliance;
(ii) The registered person may also file an intimation if he wishes to withdraw from
the scheme, before the effective date of withdrawal, and such withdrawal can be
applied for anytime during the financial year.
Once granted, the eligibility would be valid unless the permission is cancelled or
is withdrawn or the person becomes ineligible for the scheme.
(iii) Cancellation of permission: Where the proper officer has reasons to believe that
the taxable person was not eligible to the composition scheme, the proper officer
may cancel the permission (in order CMP-7) and demand the following:
a. Differential tax and interest – viz., tax payable under the other provisions of
the Act after deducting the tax paid under composition scheme;
b. Penalty determined based on the demand provisions under Section 73 or 74.
(e) Comments specific to migration cases (transition from the erstwhile law to the
GST regime): In case of migration of old registration into registration under GST, option
to avail composition scheme under GST Laws can be exercised only if the goods held in
stock by such taxable person, on the appointed day have not been purchased in the
course of inter-state trade or commerce or imported from a place outside India or
received from his branch situated outside the State, or from his agent or principal
outside the State.
(i) As per rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, in cases involving migration, there is need to
exercise such Option for composition in Form GST CMP 01 prior to appointed
date or within 30 days after the appointed date. In this case, the option to pay tax
under composition scheme shall be effective from the appointed date. This date
has further been extended to 16.08.2017. Such person would be required to file
stock statement under Rule 3(4) in Form GST-CMP03 within a period of 90 days
(extended from 60 days to 90 days by Notification No.22/2017) from the date on
which the option for composition levy is exercised or within such further period as
may be extended by the Commissioner in this behalf. However, the due date was
extended further till 31.01.2018 vide Order No. 11/2017-GST dated 21.12.2017.
(ii) A new sub-rule (3A) was inserted by Notification No.34/2017 – Central Tax
dtd.15.09.2017 which has an overriding effect on provisions of sub-rule (1), (2)
and (3). It may be noted that, the purpose of rule (3A) is only to enable the
persons to opt for composition scheme in the first year of GST implementation,
without making them to wait up to the next financial year. This is on account of
the fact that, the threshold limit for the purposes of Composition scheme u/s 10
was enhanced twice i.e. once on 27.06.2017 and then again on 13.10.2017.
Hence, sub-rule (3A) would only cover cases, where the application is made prior
to 31.03.2018. For all applications made during the financial year 2018-19, the
matter would be governed by Rule 3(3).
10.3 Comparative review
Under the erstwhile tax laws, the scheme of composition is provided for in most State level
VAT laws. The conditions prescribed under the GST law for composition scheme is broadly
comparable to the conditions / restrictions under the State level VAT laws.
10.4 Issues & concerns
1. While it is clear that a composition supplier is not entitled to effect a supply of services,
there is no specific provision in case of a composite supply / a mixed supply which are
taxed as supply of goods. Therefore, based on the principles specified in Section 8 of
the Act, it may be safe to infer that a supplier opting for composition scheme would be
entitled to effect a composite supply containing services, where the principal supply is
goods, considering that the “supply shall be treated as a supply of such principal
supply”. On the other hand, a mixed supply shall be treated as a “supply of that
particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax”. Given this position, there is
no clear case for mixed supplies wherein both services and goods contained in the
mixed supply suffer the highest rate of tax, from amongst the rates of tax applicable on
each of the individual supplies contained in the mixed supply. Due care must be
exercised in this regard.
2. An amendment of the rate applicable to the supplies effected by composition suppliers
was made with effect from 01.01.2018. In this regard, attention is drawn to the rate
applicable to traders which reads as follows – “half per cent of the turnover of taxable
supplies of goods in the State or Union territory”. It must be noted that the highlighted
expression, more specifically, “of taxable supplies” is missing in the rate entries
applicable to manufacturers and restaurant service providers. Therefore, the said 2
classes of persons would be liable to pay tax on the turnover in State, whether or not
the supplies are exempted from tax.
10.5 FAQs
Q1. Will a taxable person be eligible to opt for composition scheme only for one out of 3
branches, duly registered?
Ans. No. Composition scheme would become applicable for all the business verticals /
registrations which are separately held by the person with same PAN.
Q2. Can composition scheme be availed if the taxable person has inter-State inward
supplies?
Ans. Yes. Composition scheme is applicable subject to the condition that the taxable person
does not engage in making inter-state outward supplies, while there is no restriction on
making any inter-State inward supplies.
Q3. Can the taxable person under composition scheme claim input tax credit?
Ans. No. Taxable person under composition scheme is not eligible to claim input tax credit.
Q4. Can the customer who buys from a taxable person who is under the composition
scheme claim composition tax as input tax credit?
Ans. No. customer who buys goods from taxable person who is under composition scheme is
not eligible for composition input tax credit.
Q5. Can composition tax be collected from customers?
Ans. No. The taxable person under composition scheme is restricted from collecting tax.
Q6. What is the threshold for opting to pay tax under the composition scheme?
Ans. The threshold for composition scheme is up to 1.50 crores of aggregate turnover in the
preceding financial year.
Q7. How to compute ‘aggregate turnover’ to determine eligibility for composition scheme?
Ans. The methodology to compute aggregate turnover is given in Section 2(6). However,
since composition scheme is applicable only to suppliers making intra-state supplies,
‘aggregate turnover’ means ‘Value of all taxable supplies (excluding the value of inward
supplies on which tax is payable by a person on reverse charge basis), exempt supplies
(except interest income as discussed above), exports of goods or services or both or
inter-state supplies of a person having the same PAN (i.e., across India) excluding
CGST, IGST, SGST, UGST and cess.
Q8. What does a person having the same PAN mean?
Ans. “Person having the same PAN” means all the units across India having the same PAN
as is issued under the Income Tax Law.
Q9. What are the penal consequences if a taxable person is not eligible for payment of tax
under the Composition scheme?
Ans. Taxable person who is not eligible for the said scheme, could be imposed penalty as
determined under Section 73 or 74.
Q10. What happens if a taxable person who has opted to pay taxes under the composition
scheme crosses the threshold limit of `1.50 crores during the year?
Ans. In such case, from the day the taxable person crosses the threshold, the permission
granted earlier is deemed to stand withdrawn, and he shall be liable to pay taxes under
the regular scheme i.e. section 9, from such day.
21
Inserted vide Notification No.43/2019-Central Tax dated 30th September 2019
object to the rate adopted or exemption claimed when the error is observed at the time of
assessment, investigation or revenue audit. This could lead to multiple demands at all stages
of supply and also denial of credit. The customer may object to the classification or the rate.
The assessee himself may come to know of the error due to competitors using different rates,
paying or not paying, attending some awareness session, reading articles, books. Errors may
also come to light at the time of due diligence, internal audit, statutory audit, outsourced
consultant changing, etc.
Errors in GST classification – Impact
Many assessees could suffer loss of business in period of uncertainty till proper classification
is arrived at as they may have adopted some rate for their supplies since they could not afford
to stop business for want of HSN. After that they may be following the same incorrect
classification unless there is any objection.
The cost of errors would include the following:
1. In case of higher tax being charged, assessee may have to suffer the loss of orders and
cost of re-establishing business with the customers, the loss of credibility with
customers. The cost of discounts given to retain the customer due to incorrect rate is
inevitable.
2. In case of goods or services supplied which are nil rated or exempted the non-
availability of credit can be fatal for the business if this claim for exemption is not
accurately made by the supplier. In other words, where exemption is availed
erroneously, demand for output tax will be made without any facility to allow credit that
could have been availed. Similarly, where exemption is omitted to be claimed, there
would be a scenario of recovery of input tax credit being ineligible from the start.
Demands maybe made at multiple stages of the supply chain. This is a major departure
from the earlier regime.
3. In case of short charge due to incorrect classification or claim of exemption which is not
available, would result in non-recoverability of taxes from the customers and cost of
interest. In business, breaking the credit chain could make business unviable.
4. Valuation methods prescribed for certain categories of goods and or services would be
dependent on the classification of such goods and/or services. Wrong classification
would lead to wrong payment of tax.
5. On certain goods and/or services GST is to be discharged by the recipient of supply
under reverse charge mechanism. Wrong classification may result in non-payment of
tax or un-necessary payment of tax.
6. Denial of benefits under FTP such as duty drawback and incentives being provided for
various goods and/or services at varied rates can be the result of incorrect classification
of goods/services.
(v) In this regard, it may also be noted that the tariff entries in case of certain services refer
to the rate of tax applicable to the relevant goods. In the following cases of supply of
services, the rate of tax applicable as on a supply of like goods involving transfer of title
in goods, would be applicable on the supply of services:
Heading 9971 (ii) Transfer of the right to use any goods for any
(Financial and related purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for
services) cash, deferred payment or other valuable
consideration.
Heading 9973 (iii) Transfer of the right to use any goods for any
(Leasing or rental services, purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for
with or without operator) cash, deferred payment or other valuable
consideration.
The only exception to the above table is leasing of motor vehicle which was purchased
by the lesser prior to July 1, 2017, leased before the GST appointed date (i.e.,
01.07.2017) and no credit of central excise, VAT or any other taxes on such motor
vehicle had been availed by him. If all these conditions are fulfilled, then the lessor is
liable to pay GST only on 65% of the GST applicable on such motor vehicle. – Refer
Notification No.37/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017.
(vi) Customs Tariff Act – Rules of Interpretation
The rules of interpretation are contained in the Customs Tariff Act provides guidance
regarding the approach to be followed for reading and interpreting tariff entries. These
rules are merely summarized and listed below for convenience, whereas a detailed
study of the rules is advised from commentaries and value-added updated tariff
publications. Please refer to Customs Tariff Act for full set of Rules of Interpretation
Rule 1: headings are for reference only and do not have statutory force for
classification;
Rule 2(a): reference to an article in an entry includes that article in CKD-SKD
condition;
Rule 2(b): reference to articles in an entry includes mixtures or combination;
Rule 3(a): where alternate classification available, specific description to be
preferred;
Rule 3(b): rely on the material that gives essential character to the article;
Rule 3(c): apply that which appears later in the tariff as later-is-better;
Rule 4: examine the function performed that is found in other akin goods;
Rule 5: cases-packaging are to be classified with the primary article;
Rule 6: when more than one entry is available, compare only if they are at same
level.
(vii) Role of ‘Manufacture’ in Classification
Classification would be well understood by applying the above rules of interpretation.
Now, the process that goods are passed through can impact their classification. For
example, cutting, slicing and packing pineapple in cans in sugar syrup has primary input
of pineapple and the output is canned fruit with extended shelf-life. Now, the input and
output are not identical, but it has been held in the case of “Pio Food Packers” that this
is not a process amounting to manufacture. But, would it be possible to regard the input
and the output to retain the same classification. The answer lies in knowing the scope
of each entry applicable to classification. Another example, Kraft paper used to make
packing boxes may be sold as it is or after laminating them. It has been held in the case
of Laminated Packaging that this process is manufacture even though the input and
output fall within the same classification entry. GST Law has adopted, in section 2(72),
the general understanding of manufacture that is very similar to that in Central Excise.
The real test from this definition – is the input and output functionally interchangeable or
not in the opinion of a knowledgeable end-user – and not based on the classification
entry. Change in classification entry from one to the other, that is, classification entry for
input is not the same as that of the output, could only arouse suspicion about the
possibility of manufacture. Please note that ‘manufacture’ is included in the definition of
‘business’ (in section 2(17)) but it is not included as a ‘form of supply’ (in section 7(1)(a)
or anywhere else). Hence, the nature of the process that inputs are put through may not
be manufacture but yet may appear to move the output into a different entry compared
to the input. So, would change of classification entry be relevant or degree of change
produced in the input due to the process carried out must be considered. With the
adoption of HSN based classification from Custom Tariff Act, it is imperative to carefully
consider whether one entry has been split and sub-divided into categories even if they
both carry the similar rate of tax. Hence, the key aspects to consider are:
Identify the scope of an entry for classification of input or output
Study the nature of process carried out on the inputs
Examine by the ‘test’ (above) if result of the process is manufacture
Now identify the classification applicable to the output
For example, Is ‘desiccating a coconut’ a process of manufacture? If yes, the
desiccated coconut ought not to be considered as eligible to the same rate of tax as
coconut. Drying grains may not appear to be a process of manufacture but frying them
could be manufacture as the grains are no longer ‘seed grade’ although it resembles the
grain.
Manufacture need not be a very elaborate process. It can be a simple process but one
that brings about a distinct new product – in the opinion of a knowledgeable end-use –
and not just any person with no particular familiarity with the article. Manufacture need
not be an irreversible process. It can be reversible yet until reversed it is recognized as
a distinct new product, again, in the opinion of those knowledgeable in it. Processes
such as assembly may be manufacture in relation to some articles but not in others. So,
caution is advised in generalizing these verbs – assembly, cutting, polishing, etc. – but
examining the degree of change produced and the identity secured by the output in the
relevant trade as to the functional inter-changeability of the output with the input. If a
knowledgeable end-use would accept either input or output albeit with some
reservation, then it is unlikely to be manufacture. But, if this knowledgeable end-user
would refuse to accept them to be interchangeable, then the process carried out is most
likely manufacture. Usage of common description of the input and output does not
assure continuity of classification for the two.
Supplies may be exempt – here, the supplier is not as relevant and all supplies
that are notified would enjoy the exemption. Conditions specified may help to
determine the supplies that are to be allowed the exemption.
The following illustration is a style of drafting exemption entries that is ‘not optional’:
‘Absolutely exempt’ does not mean ‘wholly exempt’ and it does not require to be
‘unconditionally exempt’ to be ‘absolutely exempt’.
Common Errors in Classification
The errors/ deliberate action which could lead to exposure should the extent possible be
avoided. The errors would include many some of them illustrated below:
(i) Classifying the supply for lower rate of GST without merit- This maybe due to
competition or due to fact that the buyer is unable to avail the credit.
(ii) Classifying the supply under higher slab to avoid dispute – Though there may not be
any demand- customer may have some objection and raise a debit note in future. It lead
to higher working capital
(iii) Classifying under wrong heading considering applicability of the same rate- This may
not have any commercial impact as there is no rate difference. However when the rate
changes there may be a problem.
(iv) Classifying the supplies based on convenience of operation – This may not be
advisable as it is bound to lead to disputes for self as well as the customers.
(v) Classifying the supplies incorrectly to claim of exemption – This would also be
disastrous as demands if any can cripple the enterprise.
(vi) Classifying the services considering the place of supply to claim as export etc – This
can lead to a) demand for GST as supply is liable b) denial of credit due to time lapse or
if longer period invoked and c) Demand for excess refund with interest and penalties.
(vii) Similar to above classifying differently to avoid Reverse charge mechanism. – This
could also lead to demand.
(viii) Classifying under residuary entry when specific entry or general entry is available.
Illustrative rulings by Authority for Advance Rulings relevant for classification of
goods/services
1. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, DAMAN, DIU AND DNH in case of Western
Cable Engineering (P.) Ltd.,
Classification of goods (NR) - Heat shrinkable cable jointing kits - Applicant-company is
engaged in clearing of their manufactured good, 'Heat Shrinkable Components' under
Chapter 854790 in existing law, i.e., under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and were
paying duty at rate of 12.5 per cent - However, in GST regime, they have changed their
classification and started clearing their goods under Chapter 854690 - Whether since
with introduction of GST law, no change is effected in basic characteristics of said
product a sudden change in their classification without having legal and reasonable
backing is not tenable and, thus, Heat Shrinkable Cable Jointing Kits assembled from
various components is to be classified under HS 8547 - Held, yes [Para 5] [In favour of
revenue
indeed manufactured for use on hair only - Whether thus, product 'shampoo towel',
merits classification under Chapter 3305 and rate of GST applicable on said product is
18 per cent - Held, yes
5. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, WEST BENGAL in case of MD Mohta
Whether 'Rakhi' is an independently identifiable product which may be made up of
innumerable materials of no fixed or predetermined ratio, and yet retain its specific
identity as a symbol of a bond involving potential care of sister by brother, and not
merely an assemblage of discrete materials - Held, yes - Whether Rakhi cannot be
termed as a 'handicraft' item under GST under Notification No 32 of 2017-Central Tax
dated 15-9-2017 - Held, yes - Whether Rakhi's, which applicant intends to manufacture
will not be restricted to mere yellow and red yarn of 'Kalava', hence, Rakhi is not purely
puja samagri and will not attract NIL rate of duty under Serial No 92(2) of TRU
Clarification - Held, yes - Whether applicant has to classify 'Rakhi' as per its constituent
materials in accordance with rule 3(c) of Rules for Interpretation of Customs Tariff Act,
1975, as laid down in Explanatory Notes (iv) of Notification No. 1 of 2017-CT(Rate),
dated 28-6-2017 attracting GST in accordance to its classification and exemption under
Notification No. 2 of 2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 is not applicable for
'Rakhi' - Held, yes
Conclusion
The proper classification is the foundation to avoid disputes with customers as well as
demands form the revenue. The applicability of rates (which have changed in between) and
exemptions (have been notified and withdrawn) requires the updated knowledge as well as the
information of the past changes.
Statutory Provisions
11. Power to grant exemption from tax
(1) Where the Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do,
it may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, exempt generally,
either absolutely or subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, goods or
services or both of any specified description from the whole or any part of the tax
leviable thereon with effect from such date as may be specified in such notification.
(2) Where the Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do,
it may, on the recommendations of the Council, by special order in each case, under
circumstances of an exceptional nature to be stated in such order, exempt from
payment of tax any goods or services or both on which tax is leviable.
(3) The Government may, if it considers necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose
of clarifying the scope or applicability of any notification issued under sub-section (1)
or order issued under sub-section (2), insert an explanation in such notification or
order, as the case may be, by notification at any time within one year of issue of the
notification under sub-section (1) or order under sub-section (2), and every such
explanation shall have effect as if it had always been the part of the first such
notification or order, as the case may be.
Explanation. ––For the purposes of this section, where an exemption in respect of
any goods or services or both from the whole or part of the tax leviable thereon has
been granted absolutely, the registered person supplying such goods or services or
both shall not collect the tax, in excess of the effective rate, on such supply of goods
or services or both.
11.1 Introduction
This provision confers powers on the Central Government to exempt either absolutely or
conditionally goods or services or both of any specified description from whole or part of the
central tax, on the recommendations of the Council. It also confers power on the Central
Government to exempt from payment of tax any goods or services or both, by special order,
on recommendation of the Council.
11.2 Analysis
The Central or the State Governments are empowered to grant exemptions from tax, subject
to the following conditions:
(i) Exemption should be in public interest;
(ii) By way of issue of notification;
(iii) On recommendation from the Council;
(iv) Absolute / conditional exemption may be for any goods and / or services of any
specified description. In this regard, it may be noted that the exemption would be in
respect of the supply and not specifically for any classes of persons. E.g.: An absolute
exemption could be granted in respect of supply of water. Whereas, a conditional
exemption could be granted for supply of goods to canteen stores department.
(v) Exemption by way of special order (and not notification) may be granted by citing the
circumstances which are of exceptional nature.
(vi) The GST Law specifies that a registered person supplying the goods and / or services is
not entitled to collect a tax higher than the effective rate, where the supply enjoys an
absolute exemption.
Effective date of the notification or special order:
The effective date of the notification or the special order would be date which is so mentioned
in the notification or special order. However, if no date is mentioned therein, it would be:
— Date of its issue for publication in the official gazette;
Exemption under one GST Law and the effect on another GST Law:
An exemption issued under the CGST Act will ‘automatically’ exempt the same supply from the
levy of tax under the SGST/UTGST Act. This is provided under the SGST/UTGST Act. But the
converse is not necessarily applicable, that is, exemption under an SGST/UTGST Act will not
exempt levy of tax under the CGST Act.
Ans. No, the taxable person providing goods and/or services shall not collect the tax on such
goods and/or services in respect of those supplies which are notified for absolute
exemptions.
Q2. Under what circumstances can a special order be issued?
Ans. The Government may in public interest, issue a special order on recommendation of
GST council, to exempt from payment of tax, any goods and/or services on which tax is
leviable. The circumstances of exceptional nature would also have to be specified in the
special order.
Q3. What shall be the effective date in case of issue of notification?
Ans. The Notification shall be effective from the date as mentioned in the notification.
However, in case no date is mentioned in the notification the effective date shall be the
date of issue of the notification.
11.7 MCQs
Q1. Which of the following can be issued by Central Government/ State Government to
exempt goods and/or services on which tax is leviable in exceptional cases?
(a) Exemption Notification
(b) Special order
(c) Other notifications
(d) None of the above
Ans. (b) Special Order