Chemistry of Carbocations: 3.1 Background
Chemistry of Carbocations: 3.1 Background
Chemistry of Carbocations: 3.1 Background
The conversions of hydrocarbons promoted by acid catalysts involve more or less short-lived
cationic reaction intermediates known as carbocations. The chemistry of carbocations, the
sophisticated foundation of knowledge developed progressively during the 20thcentury, pro-
vides an excellent means of rationalising these conversions. This chemistry hinges around
two types of carbocation: the carbenium ion R,C+, which has been known for a considerable
period of time, and the carbonium ion R,C+, been discovered much more recently.
Although the concept of carbocation R3Cf is generally attributed to von Baeyer and Villiger
(1902) [8], it was in fact probably devised by Stieglich, dating back to the end of the 19* cen-
tury [9]. The cationic nature of some organic compounds, such as the triarylmethyl salts, was
known and accepted at the start of the 20th century, but due to the non-ionic nature of most
hydrocarbons and the difficulty of activating them electrochemically, scientists had long
rejected the idea that a hydrocarbon could, during a reaction, split into two fragments, one car-
rying a positive charge and the other a negative charge. Consequently, this idea only devel-
oped very slowly. It was not until the start of the 1920's that the concept of cationic reaction
intermediatewas revived by Meenvein [3a, 101 during his work on the Wagner rearrangement
of camphene in liquid phase. In the 1930's, several scientists working on organic reactions
played a major role in raising support for this concept. Whitmore in particular is one of the
key figures, possibly the greatest, responsible for generalising the carbocationic concept [ 1 1,
121: in 1932, he proposed the intervention of the carbenium ion as reaction intermediate in the
polymerisation of olefins and the alkylation of aromatics by the olefins [ 1I], later suggesting
their probable intervention in the catalytic cracking reaction [12]. He also proposed the 1,2
shift to explain some rearrangements [3b]. In 1934, he asserted that the acid sites are the active
centres responsible for the formation of carbocations [ 131, an idea which was not immediately
accepted by the scientific community. Other famous scientists [3b] also made important con-
tributions before the middle of the 20th century: Bartlett [3b, 141, Wilson, Winstein, Cram,
Dewar, Roberts, Schleyer, etc. In 1944, for example, Bartlett demonstrated hydride transfer
between a hydrocarbon and a carbocation [3b] in the presence of a strong liquid acid.
132 Chapter 3 Chemistry oJCarbocafions
Only carbenium ions were known at this time, and they were called “carbonium” ions. At
the end of the 194O’s, several teams of scientists, referring to the work and suggestions of
Whitmore, embarked on the rationalisation of the reactions involved in catalytic cracking on
the basis of “carbonium” ions (the current carbenium ions ) [ 151. The names of some of the
scientists in these teams are still known to this day: Hansford [ 16, 171, Greensfelder [ 18-21],
Voge and Good [ 18, 201, Thomas [22,23], Bremner [24], Ciapetta et al. [25]. In particular,
Hansford, in 1947, was the first to propose a cracking mechanism based on the carbonium
ions [16, 261. Around 1950, the hydride transfer and hydrogen transfer reactions were
demonstrated on solid catalysts by the teams of Greensfelder [18], Thomas [22] and
Hansford [ 16,271. In the early 1950’s,the protonation of unsaturated hydrocarbons (olefins,
triphenylethylene, polyaromatics) proposed by Whitmore during his studies on the olefins,
was demonstrated experimentally by UV spectroscopy in a pure sulphuric acid medium [28,
291. At the same time, numerous studies helped to identify the acid nature of solid catalysts
[22,30-361, acting either as proton donor or as highly polar Lewis acid in various reactions,
such as H2-D2 exchange, isomerisation of paraffins and cracking. Thomas [22] attributed
the acidity of silica-aluminas to the presence of trivalent aluminium in tetrahedral position
in the solid.
Towards 1950, the carbocations, regarded as species which could not be observed since
unstable and short-lived, were still considered as hypothetical species. They were neverthe-
less extremely useful since they could be used to explain numerous kinetic and stereochem-
ical studies on substitution or nucleophilic elimination reactions catalysed by acids. Olah’s
studies, carried out during the 1950’s and 1960’swith superacid media, led to the preparation
of persistent carbocations (“the qualifier “stable”, although not generally recommended [37],
will often be used later). Due to their long lifetime, direct observation and even titration
became possible on these species [3a]. The concept of carbocation had become a reality.
A scientist of Hungarian origin, Olah emigrated to Canada after the 1956 Hungarian rev-
olution and was hired by Dow Chemical Company Research Laboratory at Sarnia (Ontario).
He managed to prepare and characterise using NMR the first carbocation with a long life-
time in highly acidic medium: the tertiobutyl ion (ter-butyl ion). The presentation of his
results in 1962, at the Brookhaven conference on mechanisms, was received with very little
enthusiasm [3a]. Later studies, however, were to confirm this result and a wide range of “sta-
ble” carbocations was soon to be obtained in superacid medium [3a, 3b]. The boom in the
number of studies carried out on carbocations in the second half of the 20thcentury is largely
due to Olah, 1994 Nobel prize-winner [4] (who dedicated most of his scientific career to
them) and to his numerous co-workers.
At the start of the 1960’s, scientists were puzzled by the formulation proposed for a cer-
tain number of carbocations, including the famous 2-norbornyl cation, which displayed a
bridged “non-classical” structure. This problem was not really new, having already been
raised back in 1927 by Freudenberg [38]. Compared with the “classical” carbocations,
whose positive charge is attributed to a tricoordinated carbon, the difference with the non-
classical ions is the existence, in their formulation, of pentacoordinated carbons beside nor-
mally tetracoordinated carbons. This problem was one of the main topics of discussion in the
conferences and congresses held at the time and several publications were in fact later ded-
icated to non-classical carbocations [39,40]. Towards the end of the 19603, Olah et al. [41-
Chapter 3 Chemistry of Carbocations 133
451 as well as Brouwer and Hogeveen [46] demonstrated the scission of a oC-C bond in a
superacid. Olah suggested that the protonation of this bond involves the intermediate for-
mation of a highly unstable structure with 3 centres (1 H and 2 C) and 2 electrons, a hyper-
coordinated structure which belongs to the category of non-classical carbocations. In
particular, Olah et af. [45] were the first to have proposed the formation of the CHf ion in
superacid solution.
In 1972, Olah suggested that those ions with at least one tricoordinated carbon (classical
structure) should be called carbenium ions and that those with at least one pentacoordinated
carbon (non-classical structure) should be called carbonium ions. This definition has been
recognised by the IUPAC since 1987 [47]. The carbenium ions play a key role in the elec-
trophilic reactions of x-electron donor unsaturated hydrocarbons, whereas the carbonium
ions are the preferred intermediates of electrophilic reactions of 0-electron donor saturated
hydrocarbons [3a].
In this chapter we will first give a brief description of the various carbocations (carbo-
nium and carbenium ions), then examine their genesis and stability, before finally describ-
ing the transformations they can undergo.
a.
Fig. 3.1
Diagrammatic representation of the carbenium CR; (a) and carbonium CHR;
(b) ions. Three different possibilities are shown for the carbonium ions (dia-
grams l , 2 and 3).
Although the presence of a bond with 3 centres and 2 electrons has been clearly demon-
strated in some cations, e.g. the norbornyl cation which will be discussed below (para-
graph 3.3.1.2.A.b), the pentacoordinated carbonium ions remain less well-known than the
carbenium ions.
Carbenium ions can be generated from many hydrocarbon-containing species. Several reac-
tion categories have been proposed
- abstraction of a negatively-charged entity (e.g. hydride ion or halogen anion) from a
saturated or unsaturated molecule: abstraction of the C1- anion from ter-butyl chloride,
for example;
- addition of a proton or a carbenium ion to an unsaturated molecule;
- heterolytic scission of a larger carbenium ion;
CH3
I
Fig. 3.2
Formation of the ter-butyl cation by abstraction of the F- ion from
ter-butyl fluoride by SbF,.
presence of a small amount of water, which generates protonic acidity, of alkenes or of alkyl
chlorides which initiate the reaction [56, 651.
In contrast, the following reaction of hydride abstraction by a carbenium ion (which is
itself a Lewis acid) is well-known and widely accepted by the scientific community [52,60,
66-72]:
R-CH2-CH2-CH, + Rf + R+CHf-CH2-CH, + R-H
R-CH2-CH=CH2 + Ht + R-CHt-CH=CH2 + H,
R-CH2-CH=CH2 + R-CHfR -+ R-CH+-CH=CH, + R-CH2-R
R-CH,-CH=CH, +L + R-CH+-CH=CH, + L-H
The allylic carbocation formed is more stable than the corresponding saturated carbenium
ion.
R-CH=CH2 + H+ - R-CH+-CH3
Fig. 3.3
Addition of a proton on an olefin and on an aromatic ring.
A similar reaction may occur between an aromatic ring and a carbenium ion.
These reactions, long accepted by the scientific community, are involved in numerous
hydrocarbon conversions which will be discussed below.
H+
C H e C H + H+ - **# . ,,
CH-CH
Fig. 3.4
Addition of a proton on an acetylene. Bridged structure of the vinyl carboca-
tion obtained from acetylene.
If the vinyl carbocation is substituted (CRSR'), calculations show that it then prefers to
adopt an open structure where the C+-R' bond is colinear with the double bond [3fl:
C R S R ' + H+ + CHR=C+-R'
C. Scission of a Carbenium ion, Alkyiation by a Carbenium ion and Split of a Carbonium ion
We will see below (paragraph 3.4.1.1.B)that the scission of a carbenium ion occurs het-
erolytically on the p bond with respect to the positively charged carbon. This reaction, which
results in the formation of a smaller carbenium ion and an olefin, can be written:
(CnH*n+l)++ (CmH2m+l)++ C n-mH2(n-m)
The alkylation reaction of a carbenium ion on an olefin is the reverse reaction.
Scission of a carbonium ion has already been mentioned (paragraph 3.2.2.1.A): it results
in the formation of a smaller carbenium ion and a paraffin.
hydrogen than expected. With magic acid, it appears that, at the same time as the hydrogen
abstraction described previously, there is also an oxidation reaction by the Lewis acid SbF,
which could include the following steps [63]:
2RH + 2SbF5 + 2RtSbF,H-
SbFSH- + 2SbF5 + SbF, + SbF3 + HSbF,
SbFSH- + HSbF, + SbF, + H2 + SbF,
i.e. a total of: 2RH + 3SbF5 + 2RfSbF, + SbF, + H,
However, with the acid HF-SbF,, the hydride abstraction is mainly due to the proton and
one hydrogen molecule is produced for each hydrocarbon molecule.
This type of oxidation reaction has been confirmed by other authors for SbF, alone [76,
771 as well as for H2S04[51,76,78]. Conversion of the alkane into carbenium ion, with the
creation of an intermediate radical or radical ion, has also been proposed [60, 76, 79-81],
especially for sulphated zirconia, but this pathway still remains to be confirmed.
in the highly reactive ethyl primary carbocation, which would then attack the C-H bond of
the methane or the ethane to form respectively propane and n-butane [45,48, 82, 831.
The 2C1H type bond with 3 centres and 2 electrons can also be obtained by isomerisa-
tion of a carbonium ion initially including a 1C2H bond. This is the case, for example, of
the ethonium ion, which is produced with a 1C2H type bond with 3 centres and 2 electrons
by addition of hydrogen to the ethyl ion below -130°C, but rearranges between -100 and
40°C, with a small energy barrier, into the more stable ethonium ion characterised by a
2CIH bond [84]. In the latter case, the ethonium ion can be considered as a molecule of
ethane protonated on the C-C edge.
a. b. C.
I
Fig. 3.5
Formation of a carbonium ion by electrophilic attack of a CJ bond by a posi-
tively charged centre (proton or carbenium ion) with formation of a bond with
3 centres and 2 electrons of type 1C2H (a), 2C1H (b), 3C (c).
140 Chapter 3 Chemistry of Curbocufions
acid phase to convert the carbocations by hydride exchange into the corresponding alkanes
(fig. 3.8). These alkanes are extracted from the acid phase by the excess methylcyclopentane
and can be analysed by chromatography.
Fig. 3.7
Formation of the ter-butyl cation by reaction of methane in the superacid
HF-SbF, at 80°C.
+ R+ SbF; + RH + flcH3SbF;
Fig. 3.0
Hydride exchange between methylcyclopentane and a carbenium ion R+
When the alkane studied is isobutane (LC,H,,,), the ter-butyl cation (t-C,H; or t-Cqf) is
produced by the equilibrium reaction of figure 3.6 with simultaneous release of hydrogen.
Figure 3.9 shows that the ter-butyl cation and the hydrogen are formed in stoichiometric
quantities.
142 Chapter 3 Chemistry of Carbocations
r-----------
I I !
L
2 4 8
Number of f-Cd or t-C; ions formed (x 10-2 mol)
Linear relation obtained between the quantity of hydrogen released and the
quantity of ter-butyl ions (t-Ci = t-C4Hi) or t-Cl formed.
K = [I'-C4H 10 "
+ 1
[t-Cil. PH2
LIVE GRAPH
Click here to view
-2
v
0
+ tCf for T = 30°C
+ iC4H10 dissolved
2
Y
1.5
-2
Q
+P
y
Y
1.0
U
-
2
H 0.5
a 1 2 3 4 5
[SbF,] (molil)
LIVE GRAPH
Feedstock: i-C,Hio Click here to view
0
-1 5 0 15 30 40
Temperature (“C)
LIVE GRAPH
Click here to view
hence:
0.8
-
5?
4
$ 0.4
.-K
E
.-c
c
E
50 0.2
0
E
0 0
0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0
Hydrogen pressure (MPa)
The stability of hydrocarbon-containing ions depends on factors which are both internal
(size, configuration, electron structure of the ion) and external (immediate environment of
the ion). These factors act favourably when they offer better charge delocalisation either on
the whole of the ion itself for the first, or to external partner entities (counter-ion, solvent
molecules) for the second. The internal factors include:
Chapter 3 Chemistry of Carbocations 145
- the resonance effects: the presence of unsaturation near the charge may, by delocalis-
ing it, have a strong stabilising effect on the carbocation (with for example allyl, ben-
zylic and tropylium carbenium ions, etc.);
- the inductive effects due to the presence in the molecule of electroattractive groups
*
(CI > Br, 0, S > I N, C, H). The polarisation by inductive effect of a bond decreases
rapidly with distance (it generally becomes negligible from the third carbon atom).
The main external factors are:
- The presence of a counter-ion which neutralises more or less the charge of the carbo-
cation. For example, in the superacid HF-SbF,, the ter-butyl carbocation is stabilised
by the proximity of the slightly basic counter-anion Sb&. In the pores of a zeolite, we
might expect that the carbocations are more or less stabilised depending on their
degree of interaction with the negatively charged framework.
- The solvent effect. In liquid medium, the molecules of a polar solvent surround the ion
and stabilise it. The zeolites with highly charged framework (aluminium-rich
aluminosilicates) develop electrostatic fields in their pores which may favour the for-
mation of carbocations (the zeolites have been compared to solid solvents).
The carbocation can be considered as an unstable short-lived species (apart from some
carbenium ions in the presence of strong acids or, generally, superacids), which prefers to
minimise its energy by combination with a counter-ion to form a partially covalent bond. We
will first examine this point before discussing the relative stability of some of the most well-
known carbenium ions and that of the carbonium ions.
ti
\ CH3
/‘C% /H I
I
H’ c\H
I
0 0
/ \
\o/ \o/
rr complex (r complex
ble reasons for heterolytic rupture of the C-0 bond (where 0 is an oxygen of an acid solid
oxide) which produces the unstable “negative surface-carbocation” ion pair [ 1051:
- the pronounced tendency of the product of the acid-base reaction to form electrostatic
bonds;
- temperature, temperature rise weakening the C-0 bond;
n-C; gas
I, R-CL physically
adsorbed
x complex
CC; physically
adsorbed
i-CL gas
x complex
R-alkoxy species
R-6complex
i-ocomplex
Fig. 3.14
Simplified representation in an energy diagram of the main intermediate tran-
sition states in the isomerisation of a linear olefin n - C i (n-C,H2,).
However, various experimental arguments, published many years ago with the liquid
superacids [ 1 14, 1161 and more recently with the acid solids [ 1 171, describe this exchange
as involving a carbonium ion intermediate:
OD + CR,H + 0-(CR,HD)' + OH + CR,D
Without underestimating the existence of these concerted mechanisms, in the remainder
of this book we will focus on the notions of carbenium and carbonium ions, as well as their
corresponding formalism, to describe the numerous conversions possible with hydrocarbon-
containing molecules in petrochemistry and refining. Although somewhat simplified, the
advantage of this description is that it provides a coherent and rational presentation of the
large and complex category of these conversions.
If, for example, AB is a saturated hydrocarbon RH, the ion Rf will be formed, according
to this sequence, firstly by losing an electron, then by homolytic scission of the R-H bond:
RH -+ RH' + R+ + H'
AHXR') = AHXRH) - AHAH') +AHR
where: AHXH') = 0 by definition
However, the stability of a carbenium ion R' is also frequently expressed by considering
the neutralisation reaction of the ion which forms RH by capture of a hydride ion. The oppo-
site reaction, i.e. heterolytic dissociation of RH, is obviously different from heterolytic
dissociation with prior ionisation, discussed above. The R+ neutralisation reaction is written:
R' + H- & RH
and the stability of the corresponding ion R' is expressed by the affinityA$ of the ion R'
for the hydride ion H-:
A; = AHXRH)- AHXR') - AHAH-)
The affinity of carbenium ions for the hydride ion H- measures their tendency to desorb
as alkanes and therefore expresses their relative stability with respect with the corresponding
paraffin.
The values of AHAR') and A :: given in table 3.1 can be used to compare the stabilities
of various carbenium ions with respect to the parent hydrocarbon. Since the reference is dif-
ferent in most cases, these values cannot be used to compare the ion stabilities directly.
gen atom H' and its presence near the carbon carrying the positive charge of the ion
increases the stability of the ion. This stabilisation mode, which results from the interaction
between the vacant p orbital of the charged carbon and the CJ bond(s) located in CJ position
from this carbon, is called 0 stabilisation or hyperconjuguation.
For carbenium ions with the same hydrocarbon-containing skeleton, the stability differ-
ence would be 54 kJ/mol between tertiary and secondary and about 71 kJ/mol between sec-
ondary and primary [ 1211. Amongst the alkylcarbeniums C4H&the ter-butyl tertiary cation
is 67 kJ/mol more stable than the see-butyl secondary cation and 130 and 138 kJ/mol more
stable than the isobutyl and n-butyl primary cations respectively [ 1221.
The stability of a carbenium ion depends on several factors:
- the degree of substitution of the carbon carrying the charge, as described above;
- the number of carbons in the ion (tables 3.1 and 3.2): at 298 K, the stability of an ion
increases with its number of carbons [118, 122, 1231. This stability classification
depends on the temperature, however. At a higher temperature, the ter-butyl ion
appears to be the most stable alkylcarbenium [43]: in the superacids, for example,
some heavy tertiary carbocdtions with at least 6 carbons decompose above 353 K
(SOOC), producing the ter-butyl cation [90] ;
- the type of alkyl substituents and especially the number of C-C bonds that a sub-
stituent places in p position with respect to the positively charged carbon: an ethyl
substituent fixed to the positive carbon is more stabilising than a methyl group.
The classification of intrinsic reactivities of carbenium ions is obviously the opposite of that
of their stabilities: the reactivity of primary ions with respect to a hydride is much greater than
that of the secondary ions, in turn greater than that of the tertiary ions. By analogy with the
lability and reactivity of the proton of a Brransted acid site, the ease of desorption of these ions
as paraffins (by hydride transfer) and their reactivity therefore decrease in the following order:
primary ions secondary ions > tertiary ions
ring, and the bicyclobutonium ion CyC4H; which, strictly speaking, is a carbonium ion [3b,
3d]. The latter ion may also be represented as two cyclopropane type rings, joined along one
edge, and on which a proton is delocalised.
Table 3.1 Heats of formation AHXR') and affinity A: values for the hydride ion, a few ions
corresponding to paraffins, naphthenes and various unsaturated hydrocarbons [ 1 18a, 1241.
A 1 74 167 233
Cyclopentyl ion
O+ 195 - 250
Cyclohexyl ion
0. 187
235
-
-
-
229 -
203 -
205 -
235 - 244
257
192
Table 3.2 Stability differences between primary, secondary and tertiary carbenium ions in kcal/mol
[125].
Fig. 3.17
The cyclobutyl ion represented as an equilibrium between the structures of
cyclopropylcarbinyl and bicyclobutonium ions.
The case of the cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl carbenium ions, which are important for their
role in refining and petrochemistry, is simpler. Amongst the various possible structures of
the cyclopentyl ion, the most stable is that where a C-H bond of each carbon next to the pos-
itive carbon is nearly parallel to the vacant p orbital of this carbon (fig. 3.18). In this posi-
tion a hydride can move easily from one carbon to the next, with simultaneous shift of the
positive charge, resulting in dynamic equilibrium between five mesomer forms of the ion.
The structure of the cyclohexyl ion can be represented as an equilibrium between two ionic
forms, either both chair type or one chair, the other boat [3e].
Chapter 3 Chemistty of Carbocations 153
Fin. 3.18
Most stable form of the possible structures of the cyclopentyl ion (two C-H
bonds are almost parallel to the vacant p orbital of the unsaturated carbon).
Table 3.1 shows that these two secondary cyclic ions have quite low stabilities, similar to
those of the secondary alkylcarbenium ions. The secondary cyclohexyl ion can quickly
rearrange itself into the much more stable tertiary methylcyclopentyl ion.
The case of ions with several rings, especially the 2-norbornyl and adamantyl carboca-
tions, is more complex.
The structure of the 2-norbornyl carbocation C,Hfl has been a centre of controversy since
the middle of the 20th century [3b, 3 4 1191. The most recent data point to a non-classical
bridged structure of carbonium ion type, represented on figure 3.19a. In this structure,
which is different from that of the classical carbenium ion (fig. 3.19b), and also more sta-
ble, the cation adopts a more spherical symmetry, the charge being delocalised on 3 bonded
carbons which form a protonated cyclopropane type ring.
a. b.
7
7
Fig. 3.19
5 p’i
6
I’ + ‘\
Non-classical (a) and classical (b) structures of the 2-norbornyl carbocation C,H: I .
The adamantyl carbocation CloHt5,prepared for the first time by Olah and Schleyer, is
stable in superacid medium [3b, 1191. It consists of polycyclic carbocation with 4 hexago-
154 Chapter 3 Chemistry of Carbocations
nal gauche sides joined such that each one shares 3 carbon atoms with each of its 3 neigh-
bours (fig. 3.20). Although it is not planar, this ion is stable since the 3 C-C bonds located
in p position are parallel with respect to the vacant p orbital of the positive carbon atom,
which favours stabilisation by hyperconjugation.
6 4
Fig. 3.20
Structure of the adamantyl carbocation C,oH:5.
b. Cyclic Ions
For the unsaturated rings, the stability of the carbenium ion is closely related to the value of
the resonance energy introduced by the double bond(s) present.
Chapter 3 Chemistty of Carbocations 155
With monocyclic structures, this resonance energy, or degree of aromaticity, is the key
parameter [I]: Huckel’s semi-empirical rule [ 1291, proposed in 1931, states that the aromatic
structures (ionic or neutral) necessarily contain 4n+2 x-electrons (when n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4...
there are 2, 6, 10, 14, 18... x electrons respectively).
This rule can be used to predict (verified by theoretical calculations) that the following
ionic structures are stable [I]:
- the cyclopropenyl (2 It-electrons in the 3-carbon ring) and triphenylcyclopropenyl
cations, and especially the tripropylcyclopropenyl carbocation, which would appear to
be one of the most stable known carbenium ions, possibly even the most stable
(fig. 3.21a and b);
- the tropylium cation or cycloheptatrienyl cation (fig. 3.21c), a cation with 6 x-elec-
trons, but with a 7-carbon ring, would have the most stable configuration just after that
of the tripropylcyclopropenyl ion; in particular, it would be slightly more stable than
the primary benzyl carbocation isomer [ 1301. In liquid phase, its formation is easy and
has been known for many years. In gaseous phase, its formation has been deduced
from results obtained with various alkylaromatics such as toluene, xylenes, ethylben-
zene and alkylaromatics substituted by chlorine [ 113, 1 18a, 118b, 130-1371.
Huckel’s rule can also be used to predict that cyclopentadienyl carbenium ions and sub-
stituted ions, such as the pentaphenylcyclopentadienyl ion, are not very stable since not aro-
matic (4 It-electrons in the 5-carbon ring).
a.
b.
C6H5 C
, 6H5 CH3CH2CH2
\ \ /CH2CH2CH3
c=c c=c
\ I
C+
I
- etc.
\ I
C+
I
- etc.
C6H5 CH2CH2CH3
Fig. 3.21
Aromatic cyclic ions: cyclopropenyl cations (a), triphenylcyclopropenyl and
tripropylcyclopropenyl cations (b), two C,H; ions: benzyl and tropylium (c).
156 Chapter 3 Chemistry of Carbocations
Although it is not strictly speaking a cyclic ion, the benzyl primary carbocation
C6H,-CHi is worth mentioning briefly here due to its relation with the tropylium ion
(fig. 3.21~).Due to the proximity of the 6-carbon aromatic ring, the stability of this ion is at
least equivalent to that of the ally1 carbocations. Calculation shows that its formation energy
is close to that of the tropylium ion, whose high (relative) stability had been predicted by
Huckel [129]. Strangely enough, attempts to identify the benzyl carbocation using isotope
marking led to the conclusion that the 7 carbons of this cation have the same behaviour
[ 1301. Meyerson et al. [ 1301 appear to have been the first to propose that the true structure
of the benzyl ion is rather that of the tropylium ion, where the 7 carbons are included in the
ring and become equivalent [ 1 13, 118a, 1 18b, 130-1341. Siege1 [ 1321 reaches similar con-
clusions without dismissing, however, the possibility that the two isomer structures
(table 3.1) exist and can switch very rapidly from one to the other (fig. 3.21~).Identification
of the benzyl cation using the tropylium ion could explain why the phenyl ion C6Hf is
strongly stabilised by the presence of a methyl substituent on the aromatic ring (benzyl or
tropylium ion), whilst a second methyl substituent produces virtually no further stabilisation
[ 1301. Note that the rearrangement of the benzyl ion into the tropylium ion would only have
been observed in gaseous phase, not in solution [ 1381.
Concerning the benzyl carbocations, their stability in liquid phase increases with the
number of aryl groups attached to the cationic centre [120a], i.e. in the following order:
triphenylmethyl cation > diphenylmethyl cation > primary benzyl cation Ph-CH,f
The benzyl cations are generally more stable than the tertiary carbenium ions [ 120al. The
triphenylmethyl ion is known for its high stability (or persistence) in liquid medium. The pri-
mary benzyl carbocation has only been identified by NMR in superacid medium [ 1201.
C. Dications
The carbenium dications only appear to have been observed in a limited number of cases.
Figure 3.22 [ 1241 shows the structure of some simple persistent dications, identified in solu-
tion. Other dications of more complex structure have recently been described in the litera-
ture, e.g. the tetraphenyl-p-xylyl or tetraphenyl-m-xylyl dications which have the same
overall formula Ph2-C+-Ph<fPh2 [3gJ, and the pagodyl dication formed by oxidation of
pagodane in superacid medium [3g].
CH3 H
I I
CH,=CHCH; , CH3-7' > CH3-C+ > CH,-CH;
I
CH3 CH3
Ally1 f-butyl lsopropyl Ethyl
cation cation cation cation
H H
Methyl Vinyl Phenyl
cation cation cation
Fig. 3.23
Classification by order of stability in liquid phase of various carbenium ions.
cult to compare their stabilities with those of carbenium ions, due to insufficient data.
Figure 3.24 [ 1221 ranks by relative stability various alkylcarbenium ions and some alicyclic
carbonium ions derived from the protonated cyclopropane ion. According to this figure, pro-
tonated cyclopropane ions with few substituents (one or two) would have, for an equivalent
number of carbons, stabilities in between those of the secondary and primary alkylcarbe-
nium ions. Those with a greater number of substituents are more stable than the secondary
alkylcarbenium ions.
Overall, the stability rules are similar to those of the corresponding carbenium ions. For
example, the stability of the alkylcarbonium ion increases with its number of carbons and
the degree of substitution of the carbon carrying the charge. For instance, the protonic affini-
ties in gaseous phase of methane, ethane, propane and butane are respectively 532,552-588,
6 19-640 and 687-698 kJ/mol [66]. Concerning the protonated cyclopropane and cyclobu-
tane ions, Condon [ 1391 considers that the factors involved in their stability are the same as
those involved in the stability of the cyclopropane and cyclobutane hydrocarbons; the num-
ber of alkyl groups carried by these rings, i.e. the number of tertiary carbons on the ring, is
one of these factors.
"I 0
kJ/mol
I I I b
3 4 5 6 7
Number of carbons
The increase in stability provided by any further substituent on the charged carbon is,
however, less than that observed with carbenium ions, since the charged carbon of the car-
bonium ion is already more substituted initially than the carbenium ion [ 1221.
Authors are not unanimous regarding the relative stabilities of the various isomer carbo-
nium ions which may form by protonation of an alkane. Some [ 1401 propose, on the basis
of results obtained by chlorination of a linear alkane, that protonation occurs preferentially
on the penultimate (last but one) secondary C-H bond and very rarely on the primary C-H
bonds and the interior and terminal C-C bonds. The theoretical calculations by other
authors show that the 2C 1H bonds (fixation of a proton on a C-C bond) are more stable
than the 1C2H bonds (fixation of a proton on a C-H bond) [66]. The energy differences
between these two bonds would increase as the size of the cation decreases: 11,21-38 and
3 1-50 kJ/mol for n-butane, propane and ethane respectively [66]. The ethonium carbonium
ion exists in the two isomer forms of figure 3.25, calculations showing that the first is more
stable [ 1041.
,'H' *
,? .
I
,
+.
%
Fig. 3.25
Isomer forms of the ethonium carbonium ion.
Another method is the interaction with a solvent, which is to a certain extent the case with
carbenium ions obtained in solution. The formation of an ion pair from a neutral compound
and the separation of these ions (dissociation) are in fact strongly favoured by polar solvents,
which cause charge separation due to their high dielectric constant and stabilise the small
ions by solvation [l]. The solvent effect of zeolites [103, 141-1451 (see paragraph 2.2.1.4.C)
is included in this category. The solvation forces often supply most of the energy required to
form the carbenium ions. The Born simple relation gives a first approximation of the free
energy variation resulting from the movement of an ion of radius r from one solvent (of
dielectric constant E,) into another (E~),and has been used to compare the solvating powers
of various solvents with respect to ions:
V = k.[R+]
where k is the intrinsic rate constant of the conversion and [R'] the carbenium ion concen-
tration.
The ion concentration is directly related to its stability with respect to desorption as a
hydrocarbon: the lower the tendency of the ion to give up its positive charge to its counter-
ion to reform a hydrocarbon, the higher its concentration in the medium.
The bimolecular conversion of a carbenium ion by reaction with a given substrate S is ini-
tially governed by an acido-basic interaction between an electron-deficient species, in this
case the carbenium ion (considered as a Lewis acid), and an electron-donor species (a base).
This conversion is governed by a rate equation which depends on the previous factors and
on the substrate concentration:
v = k . [ R + ] [S]
The rate constant k is a function of the intrinsic activity of the carbenium ion and of the
acido-basic complexation stability with the electron-donor centre of the substrate (olefinic,
aromatic .rc bonds, oC-C or C-H bond). Obviously, k may take different values depending
on the type of S.