Danger of A Single Story

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
The passage discusses how colonialism has left an impact through establishing stereotypes and single stories, and how changing one's perspective is needed to break free from this. It also talks about the capacity of colonized people to shatter the inferiority mindset imposed on them.

As a child, Chimamanda Adichie's experience with British books made her think representations of non-foreign characters in literature were exotic or abnormal.

Chimamanda Adichie had boxed Fide's family into only being poor, due to the single story she had heard, and did not consider they could make or do anything else.

Chimamanda Adichie’s The Dangers of a Single Story recognizes the influence of power in

establishing stereotypes and reflects the idea that individuals have the capacity to shatter the inferiority

mindset imposed by their colonizers by reforming their perspective and looking beyond others’ defining

story. Chimamanda Adichie makes use of personal reflections and anecdotes to illustrate how colonialism

has left an impact on her upbringing and has influenced the way she perceived people and literature. In

the beginning of the text, Chimamanda Adichie explains the influence of her experience of British and

American children’s books to her own stories. “My characters also drank a lot of because the characters

in the British books I read drank ginger beer.” This statement highlights the character’s vulnerability to

the inferiority mindset at a young age and made her think that the representation of non-foreign

characters, like her, is exotic or out of the norm. However, Chimamanda Adichie was able to shatter this

mindset when she discovered African writers who represented people of her kind and made her realize

that individuals she recognized can also exist in literature. This shows the capacity of colonized people to

break through the postcolonial legacy imposed by their colonizers upon them and how non-foreign and

marginalized characters can also be made central.

Chimamanda Adichie presented various instances where her inferiority mindset influenced the

way she perceived people and lead her to box them into a certain standard, similar to the way the

colonizers did to her country years in the past. Her perception of Fide’s family, for instance, as shown in

the line “It had not occurred to me that anybody in his family could actually make something. All I had

heard about them is how poor they were, so that it had become impossible for me to see them as anything

else but poor” exemplifies how she boxed them into a certain standard and refused to see them as

anything but inferior. This shows the colonial legacy left by the colonizers to the people of Nigeria which

lead them to look at people in a certain standard and influenced them to box others into a single &

defining story or perspective, the same way it was done to them in the past.

In the latter part of her speech, Chimamanda Adichie highlighted the influence of power in

creating the world’s perception of certain groups — that in turn, shapes their identity. She illustrated

these with her personal experience in dealing with her professor and her room mate who both perceived
Africa and its people the way it was shown popularly on media in the United States. “If I had not grown

up in Nigeria, and if all I knew about Africa were from popular images, I too would think that Africa was

a place of beautiful landscapes […] incomprehensible people, fighting senseless wars, dying of poverty

and AIDS, unable to speak for themselves, waiting to be saved, by a kind, white foreigner.” This gave

both her room mate and her professor a set standard for her and who she was supposed to be based on the

preconceived notions presented to them by the powerful media of the United States. Furthermore, they are

unable to look beyond these notions because Africa has less power than the U.S. and only those with

immense power are able to determine the single, definitive story of others. Chimamanda Adichie

highlights the negative implication of this power-play when she says, “It robs people of dignity. It makes

our recognition of our equal humanity difficult. It emphasizes how we are different rather than how we

are similar.”

Through her speech, Chimamanda Adichie reiterates the need to look beyond one’s stereotype,

that portrays incomplete representations of people, in order to break free from this colonial legacy.

Instead, we must choose to look at all sides of their stories — the experiences that make them just as real,

capable, and complex as anyone else. All of these start with a change in perspective; similarly,

Chmimamanda Adichie illustrates this in the line “Every time I am home I am confronted with the usual

sources of irritation for most Nigerians: our failed infrastructure, our failed government. But also by the

incredible resilience of people who thrive despite the government, rather than because of it.” When we

reject a stereotype and look at things in its complexity, only then do we have the capacity to empower,

humanize, and restore the dignity of those who are shown as inferior.

Chimamanda Adichie’s The Dangers of a Single Story reflects an underlying calling to break

through the inferiority mindset established by those in power. It has become a norm for individuals from

previously colonized countries to look at themselves as subaltern to those in the west; the author,

however, aims to reinvent this narrative and encourages its readers to look beyond the single stories

imposed on them by those in power and instead, engage with them through stories and experiences that

moulded them into the people that they are today. In the words of Chimamanda Adichie, “[…] when we
reject the single story, when we realize that there is never a single story about any place, we regain a

kind of paradise.”

You might also like