DPR On L&T Project
DPR On L&T Project
DPR On L&T Project
Report
A cost estimate amounting to ` 67.40 Crore has been framed to cover the
cost of construction of 220/33KV Pooling Substation Lahal under financial
assistance from ADB.
The work will be executed under the supervision of DGM
(Projects) HPPTCL, Shimla.
ALLOCATION SHEET
1 Year 2013-14
TABLE 1.1
CHAPTER: 1
1.1 PROJECT REPORT AT A GLANCE
S.No. Details Description
5. Approvals:
Government
Approval:
Project 24 Months
Completion date:
TABLE 1.2
CHAPTER: 2
2.1 PROJECT REPORT
2.1.1 Scope of the Project:
Transmission Systems covered under this Detailed Project Report is
estimated to be amounting to ` 67.40 Crores. The Transmission project
to be implemented under this report would be in major river basin of
Himachal Pradesh namely Ravi Basin. The details of Project are as
under:
2.1.2 Objectives
This project is being constructed to evacuate 65.8 MW of power from
various Small HEP’s in Bharmour area of Ravi basin which have been
awarded to various IPP’s by HP Govt by the year 2014. Keeping in view
the upcoming of these projects in Bharmour area of Ravi river basin in
Himachal Pradesh, HPPTCL is intending to construct Integrated
Transmission System in the area due to the limited corridors availability
and as such too many circuits cannot be constructed. Total available
potential from Small HEPs in the Bharmour area is about 65.8 MW
which will be evacuated by pooling it at 33KV and then stepping up to
220KV by construction of proposed 1x50/63MVA, 33/220KV substation
at Lahal in the first instance. This 65.8 MW of power will be further
evacuated by constructing envisaged 220KV Lahal- Budhil Line (Single
ZEBRA) where it will terminate at 220KV Budhil power house
Switchyard and from there to the Regional grid PGCIL sub station
Rajera through existing IPP/PGCIL network.. This arrangement takes
care of reliability and redundancy in the system to evacuate power in
case of outage of any transmission line because of unforeseen
conditions.
2.1.3 Introduction
(Proposal, Brief Note, Justification & Recommendation)
S.No. Details of Sub-station
Project
TABLE 2.1
1. The land for the substation has been identified and the formalities are
being completed and is likely to be acquired by HPPTCL in the current
financial year 2012-13.
2. The control room shall accommodate all the bay modules as per the
scope.
2.1.6 Challenges:
The other major issue was of the financial viability and tariff model of
these projects. The capital cost for these projects are high because of
the difficult terrains. Considering the front loading of the tariff, it may be
on higher side, but levelised tariff for these projects are well within the
optimum limit. Similarly, the tariff model of these projects has been ring
fenced from the existing transmission network of HPPTCL and
apportionment of the tariff for inter-linked transmission asset would be
determined as per the applicable regulations issued by appropriate
Regulatory Commission/ Government body.
IPPs have agreed to mutually pool their power at 33/220 KV level for its
further evacuation through 220 kV and 400KV proposed Intrastate
Transmission system of HPPTCL.
2.1.7 Benefits:
i).Tangible – Tangible cost benefit analysis has been done on the basis
of Financial Internal Rate of Return. For FIRR, cash inflow has been
done on the basis of Annual Fixed Charges. Annual Fixed Charges has
been calculated based on the present Regulations of HPERC. Further,
cost benefit analysis for this project has been done basin wise and not
individual projects wise. The details of recovery of Transmission
Charges on Pooled basis from the Long Term Open Access Customers
are enclosed as Annexure – 13.
For the calculation of the tangible cost benefit analysis sheets are
enclosed as:
Annexure – 11: AFC calculation of Project 1x50/63MVA, 220/33KV
Substation Lahal.
Draw down of funds has been considered as 40% in first year and 60%
in second year. IDC has been calculated based on the above draw
down of funds.
enclosed as Annexure-4.
Line Bays : 1
Bus Coupler : 1
Bus Sectionalize : 0
Transformer Bays : 1
33KV Bays
Line Bays : 0
Bus Coupler : 1
Bus Sectionalize : 0
Transformer Bays : 1
3.3 Target Beneficiaries: The target beneficiaries of this project are the
constituent states of Northern Regions. The above substation is
constructed for evacuation of Power from various small HEPs of various
capacities in Ravi Valley mainly.
33KV 220KV
Switching Schemes
33KV Double Bus Bar system 220KV Double Bus Bar system
Substation Equipment
Isolators: The isolators with one switch and two switch shall be with the
GIS module comply to IEC 52271-102 in general. Isolators shall be
motor operated. Earth switches are provided at various locations to
facilitate maintenance. Main blades and earth blades shall be interlocked
and interlock shall be fail safe type. All earth switches shall be motor
operated type.
Surge Arrestors: Station class current limiting, heavy duty gapless type
surge arresters will be A/S type conforming to IEC 50099-4 in general
shall be provided. The rated voltage of surge arrester and other
characteristics are chosen in accordance with system requirements.
Surge arresters shall be provided near line entrances, so as to achieve
proper insulation coordination. These shall be fitted with pressure relief
devices and diverting ports suitable for preventing shattering of porcelain
housing providing path for the flow of rated currents in the event of
arrestor’s failure.
Fire Fighting System: For Auto Power transformer the fire protection
system shall be Nitrogen injection fire prevention & extinguishing system
and protection system for indoor control room and GIS room will be
portable type.
Control Room: There will be 220KV GIS cum control room building that
will have AC, DC distribution room battery & charger room, PLCC, SAs
system and offices. There will be separate one GIS room for 33KV
substation.
i. Differential protection
ii. Restricted earth fault protection
iii. Over-current and earth fault protection on HV/MV side
iv. Over fluxing protection
v. Overload alarm.
3.7.2 Bus bar Protection: The high speed bus bar differential protection
which is essential to minimize the damage and maintain system stability
at the time of bus bar faults shall be provide for 33KV & 220KV buses.
Bus bar protection scheme shall be such that it operates selectively for
each bus and incorporate necessary features required for ensuring
security. The scheme shall have the provision for future expansion. For
existing substations, the existing bus bar protection shall be augmented
wherever required.
Coupling devices shall be suitable for 4400/8800pF for 220KV CVTs for
phase to phase coupling. The pass band of coupling devices shall have
sufficient margin for adding communication channel in future if required
Necessary protection devices for the safety of personnel and low voltage
part against power frequency voltages and transient over voltage shall
also be provided. The line traps shall be broad band tuned suitable for
blocking the complete range of carrier frequencies.
Line Trap shall have the necessary protective devices such as lighting
arresters for the protection of tuning device and shall be equipped with
corona rings. The carrier terminals shall be of single side-band (SSB)
amplitude modulation (AM) type and shall have 4 KHz band width.
Decoupling network consisting of line traps and coupling capacitors may
also be required at certain substation in case of extreme frequency
congestion.
The Seismic Zone: The construction of the colony and control room
depends upon the seismic zone under which the substation falls and it
varies in ascending order from seismic zone 1 to seismic zone 5. The
identification of seismic zone is based a seismic zone map. The sub-
station area falls in the zone -5. During the design of the structure this
aspect shall be taken care of.
Altitude: The altitude of the sites is between 1500 to 2000 meters above
mean sea level and the same shall be considered whole finalizing the
technical specification of the equipment. During winter the area can
experience one or two snow falls of moderate intensity.
CHAPTER: 4
4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The project of transmission system will be planned, implemented,
monitored and controlled through Integrated Project Management and
Control System (IPMCS).
Level – I
Level-II
Planning is done package-wise and is worked out and finalized with the
respective contractor/vendor during the pre-award stage. Level II
networks are made within the milestones identified in the project Master
Network (L-I).
Level-III
Plans deal with elaborate schedules and weekly/monthly rolling plans
which are prepared for activities of engineering, supply (as the case may
be) & field activities. These form the basis of monitoring by the various
functions.
The system envisages monthly review of the level II programmer with
contractors and at field on a weekly basis. A site monthly progress report
is sent to the head office having four sections, i.e.
(`.in Crores)
Total Cost
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 67.40
The estimated cost of the project based on 4nd Quarter 2011 price level
is as follows:
5.1.2 Basis of Cost Estimate: The detailed cost estimates for the
procurement and erection of the equipments are based on the market
rates in the 4nd Quarter of 2011. The prices are variable. Hence the
price contingencies are not included in the BOQ but included separately
in the in the abstract of Cost. The detailed BOQ is enclosed in
Annexure – 9.
First year 40 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 100 %
7. Annexures
Details of Annexure:
1 Annexure -1 (a) and 1(b) Copy of the approval from Board of
Directors
These category covers wall which use soil, reinforced with reinforcing
bars, to provide a stable earth retaining system and includes reinforced
soil and soil nailing.
Hybrid system: The type of retaining walls that use both factors that
is their mass and reinforcement for stability are called hybrid or
composite retaining wall system.
Anchored Earth walls: Any wall which uses facing units tied to rods
or strips which have their ends anchored into the ground is an anchored
earth wall. The anchors are like abutments. The cables used for tieing
are commonly high strength, pre-stressed steel tendons. To aid
anchorage, the ends of the strips are formed into a shape designed to
bind the strip at the point into the soil.
Tailed gabion: Gabions are cages, cylinders or boxes filled with earth
or sand that are used in civil engineering, road-building, military
application and many others. Gabion elements fitted to geogrid tails
extending into supported soil. For erosion controlled caged rip-rap are
used. For dams or foundation of buildings, metal structures are used.
Sheet pile walls: Steel sheet pile walls are constructed by driving
steel sheets into a slope or excavation up to the required depth. Their
most common use is within temporary deep excavations. They are
considered to be most economical where retention of higher earth
pressure of soft soil is required. It cannot resist very high pressure.
• A Peaceful environment.
The engineer has to keep in mind the municipal conditions, building bye
laws, environment, financial capacity, water supply, sewage
arrangement, provision of future, aeration, ventilation etc., in suggestion
a particular type of plan to any client.
The special features of the demand for housing consists of in its unique
nature and depend on the following factors.
• Ease of drainage.
• Transport facilities.
• The site is very clear planned without ably dry grass and other throne
plats over the entire area.
• Detailed survey: The detailed survey has been done to determine the
boundaries of the required areas of the site with the help of thedolite and
compass.
8.6.6 DESIGNS
• DESIGN OF SLABS
• LOADS ON BEAMS
• DESIGN OF BEAMS
• LOADS OF COLUMNS
• DESIGN OF COLOUMNS
• DESIGN OF FOOTINGS
•When the slab are supported in two way direction it acts as two way
supported slab.
i. Span
ii. Shorter span:- Lx = 5.8m longer span:-Ly =7.62m
ii. Check Lx/Ly= 7.62/5.8 =1.3<2
Permissible depth=100mm
Mu.lim=0.36.Xumax(1-0.42Xumax)fckbd^2
14.86x10^6= 0.36.Xumax (1-0.42x0.48)15x1000d^2
• Dead load
• Live load
• Wind load
Load calculations
Slab load –
W = 6KN
Lx = 5.8
=27.04x5.8=78.416KN
Bd 230x373
Tc = % of tension steel
Pt = Ast x 100
Bd
Pt = 402.12x100 = 0.60%
SPAN=7.62m
Slab load –
W = 6KN
Ly = 7.62
=30.68x7.62=116.89KN
Bd 230x373
Tc = % of tension steel
Pt = Ast x 100
Bd
Pt = 402.12x100 = 0.60%
230x373
Calculation:
Check:-
Mu = 11.577 KN-m
= 0.138x20x230x305^2
= 59.05 KN-m
Mu < Mulimit
bd^2 230x305^2
Refer table no.2 at sp-16 and read out the value of percentage of
reinforcement
For Mu = 1.39 Pt = ?
bd^2
1.35 0.409
1.40 0.426
Mu = 1.39 Pt = 0.422
bd^2
Pt = 0.422 %
Area of reinforcement
Pt = Astx100
Bd
=0.422x230x405
= 393.093 mm^2
Ast provided:
Mu =19.18 KN-m
Mulimt = 0.138 fck bd^2
=0.138x20x230x305^2
= 59.05 KN-m
Mu < Mulimit
ii) Conducting two (2) no. of dynamic cone penetration test at site.
iii) Collection of sample at two (2) locations for CBR tests as per mark in
drawing.
CBR Tests
The mould containing the specimen, with the base plate in position, but
the top face exposed, was placed on the lower plate of the testing
machine. Surcharge weights, sufficient to produce an intensity of loading
equal to the weight of the base material and pavement was placed on
the specimen. Specimen was soaked and the equal surcharge was used
during the soaking period. To prevent upheaval of soil into the hole of
the surcharge weight, 2.5kg annular weight was placed on the soil
surface prior to seating the penetration plunger after which the
remainder of the surcharge was placed. The stress and strain gauges
has then be set to zero. The initial load applied to the plunger was
considered as the zero load when determining the load penetration
relation. Load was applied to the penetration plunger so that the
penetration was approximately 1.25mm per minute. Readings of the load
was taken at penetrations of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0, 5.0, 7.5,
10.0, and 12.5mm.
The size of the pit has been taken as 2.0m*2.0m & depth has kept at
1.60m. settlement has been recorded from dial gauges placed at two
diametrically opposite ends of the test plate at different time intervals
corresponding to the load applied by hydraulic jack. The test plate was
300*300mm size and 25mm thick. The bottom of the pit was made
leveled before placing the plate in position for conducting the test.
A seating load of 70gm/sq.cm was applied and after the dial gauge
readings are stabilized, the load was released and the initial readings of
the dial gauges record after they indicate constant reading. The load
was increased in stages. These stages were 5.0, 9, 14, 18, 27, 36, up to
72KN or load at which settlement attains 40mm whichever met earlier.