In This Issue: Play The New York $12,000 Open: Bridge Today - May 2003
In This Issue: Play The New York $12,000 Open: Bridge Today - May 2003
In This Issue: Play The New York $12,000 Open: Bridge Today - May 2003
May 2003
ß
˙
∂
ç
In this issue:
Features
ALERT: Please do not email this emag to anyone. Much time, energy and money was spent to produce this
product, and most people can afford to pay for it. If you would like someone to see an issue, please contact
us with his email address (write to matt@bridgetoday.com) and we’ll gladly pass on a sample excerpt. Sub-
scriptions are $33 per year for 12 monthly issues.
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 2
Viewpoint
A reader writes about the recent publicity we’ve been giving to the Bridge Pro
Tour: “I wonder what it is that you find positive about the pro bridge tour.
For the ‘amateur’ perhaps, it’s fun to play a hand or two with a good player. But
for good players, what’s the reward for playing with a random bunch of people
with whom one has no system? Consider, too, that to win you must play (usually)
four sessions, and coming in anything other than first or second really isn’t worth
the time....Perhaps the event could be played as an individual qualifying
followed by pairing up among the qualifiers. That would let the ‘amateur’ play
with good players and then the good players play with their regular partners
(assuming both qualified) or customers....”
The setup for the tour is in its early stages and does require fixing here and
there. But the current version of the tour is a mixture of different levels of players
only because the majority of pros haven’t yet taken the plunge (though in NYC
the field was quite strong). In any case, the BPT fields are certainly stronger than
the typical regional open pair game.
Larry King has said that the game of bridge at the tournament level is “corrupt.”
By corrupt, he means that anybody can buy his way into the winner's circle by
hiring a partner or team. This is not exactly true, since a sponsor still has to play
his share, but in any case this cannot happen in an individual. If, however, you
allow partnerships into the Pro Tour, you revert to the old path. Making bridge
popular with the general public requires a new path: a promotion that simplifies
the game to the bare necessities. Once you get partnerships and teams and
conventions involved, it complicates bridge. The path that King is taking is
similar to tennis or golf — sports that promote individual stars.
From the players’ perspective, “individuals” are a different kind of bridge, but
no more different than matchpoint scoring is to imps. Each kind of game requires
different talents. The “individual” reminds me of rubber bridge, where you have
to play the people (including your partner), not just the cards. It's fun and
psychological.
We go with our teammates to a Chinese “Oh no,” the waiter explains, “the aster-
restaurant and find that we are incompat- isk means ‘new dish.’ Two asterisks is very
ible. They want hot and spicy and we want new. Three asterisks is ‘new chef specialty
mild and edible. We all, however, want this week.’” It takes a lot to shut my team-
variety, but no one wants to compromise. mates up, but this makes them speechless.
The menu has items marked with one, two In the silence that follows, I contemplate an
and three asterisks. One teammate insists earlier moment in the day when I took the
that he will eat nothing less than three wrong inference.
asterisks. His partner is willing to go down
to two, but will not stoop to one. I need to I held:
be assertive and announce that I don’t eat ß A 5 ˙ A K J 10 6 ∂ K J 7 ç J 4 2,
anything with an asterisk next to it. My sitting in first seat, with everyone vulner-
partner, who is easygoing within the narrow able. I opened one heart, my LHO over-
confines of no-asterisk food, allows me to called one spade, and my partner bid two
pick one beef and one chicken dish. We hearts. I made a slightly aggressive jump to
will also have wonton soup. Our teammates four, and this ended the bidding.
settle on two three-asterisk dishes, plus hot-
and-sour soup. South West North East
1˙ 1ß 2˙ pass
* * *
4˙ (all pass)
A strange thing happens when
the food arrives. My “mild” West led the ßK, and the dummy ap-
chicken is covered in ominous peared:
little red dots, while my team-
mates’ chicken is white, gluti-
nous and very mild, not a pepper in sight.
When I taste mine it’s a near-death experi-
ence and I call for the fire extinguisher.
When they taste theirs they call for the
waiter.
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 4
North North
ß 10 9 7 4 ß 10 9 7
˙Q74 ˙—
∂Q ∂—
ç A 10 9 8 3 ç A 10 9
ßK
South (Roselyn) South
ßA5 ß5
˙ A K J 10 6 ˙ 10 6
∂KJ7 ∂J
çJ42 ç42
This did not seem like a particularly At this stage I was fairly optimistic about
difficult hand. I could see nine tricks after my proposed line of play. Remember West’s
knocking out the ∂A. A double finesse in vulnerable overcall? All he had shown up
clubs offered an excellent chance of a tenth with so far was the ßK-Q and the ∂A.
trick, especially since West had made a There was plenty of room for the çQ.
vulnerable overcall. The probability of his
holding at least one of the missing club I duly played a low club to the 10. East
honors was high. won the çQ, and yet another hand was
sacrificed to the god of false inferences.
I won the ßA and immediately played a
low diamond. West hopped up with the Here were the hands:
∂A and returned a trump. I now drew the
rest of the trumps and noted that West ß 10 9 7 4
˙Q74
pitched the ∂2 on the third round. Now
∂Q
what? ç A 10 9 8 3
ßKQJ8 ß632
N
I realized that I needed two entries to my ˙83
W E
˙952
hand to take two club finesses, so at trick ∂ A 10 5 2 S ∂98643
ç765 çKQ
six I led the çJ. West played low very
ßA5
smoothly, and I played low, too. East won ˙ A K J 10 6
the çK and — somewhat to my surprise — ∂KJ7
returned a low diamond. I won with the çJ42
∂K, throwing a club from dummy.
At the other table, the contract was
Here was the situation. East-West had defeated with different defense. The open-
three tricks, and the lead was in my hand: ing lead was the same, the ßK. South won,
drew trumps and played a diamond. When
West won, he switched to a club. Declarer
finessed; East won and returned a spade.
West won and played another club. South
finessed, and ended with the same sad
result as I did.
contract and failed to rise to the occasion. This hand is a beautiful example of a
show-up squeeze. The key to executing it is
At the stage that I ran the çJ, here was to give up both a diamond and spade early.
the position: So long as West doesn’t force me into a
premature club decision, the hand is cold! I
ß 10 9 7 was so blinded by the vulnerable overcall, I
˙—
∂—
failed to think beyond the simple-minded
ç A 10 9 8 3 inferences I took.
ßQJ8 ß63
˙— N ˙— * * *
W E
∂ 10 5 S ∂9864 The bad inferences in the Chinese res-
ç765 çKQ taurant give all of us a good chuckle. Din-
ß5
˙ J 10
ner is not the disaster that it appears to be.
∂KJ The three-asterisk chicken is benevolently
çJ42 divine, and the no-asterisk beef fires up our
teammates for the evening session.
Instead of a club, look at the effect of
leading my ß5. Suppose West wins and
returns a club. I can finesse and win what-
ever East returns (diamond or spade) in my
hand. Suppose I now cash my remaining
red winners. West is forced to hold onto his Kantar’s Korner
ßJ, Which means I can throw my spades
from dummy. Here is the two-card ending! by Eddie Kantar
ß—
˙—
∂—
ç A 10
ßJ ß—
˙— N ˙—
W E
∂— S ∂9
ç7 çQ
ß—
A collection of recent events
˙—
in the life of the author...
∂—
ç42
West has been forced to throw a club on Do you play upside-down attitude sig-
the previous trick. When I lead a low club nals? If you don’t, this is a compelling ex-
at trick twelve, and West shows up with ample of why you should.
another club, I know that he cannot hold
the çQ. His last card has to be the ßJ. (If
he really overcalled one spade with a three-
card suit, more power to him!)
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 6
North
Just got a call from Don Krauss.
ßQJ876
˙KQJ4 He is locked up in a room at the
∂K Bellagio playing rubber bridge
çQ84 around the clock with the likes of Bob
West East Hamman. This is a yearly three day (and
ßAK53 ß42
night) hiatus. Yes, they do take time off to
˙8653 ˙A97
∂J543 ∂Q982 eat at the best places — and even hit the
ç6 ç J 10 9 7 gaming tables a bit. He had one hand to tell
South me about, a ghoulie, of course (cards are
ß 10 9 dealt 5-5-3 instead of one at a time).
˙ 10 2
∂ A 10 7 6
çAK532 With both sides vulnerable, his partner
the dealer, Don was looking at:
West North East South
ßA
— 1ß pass 2ç
˙Q53
pass 2˙ pass 2 NT ∂ A Q J 10 9 8 5 3 2
pass 3 NT (all pass) ç—
*automatic
Kantar’s Card Combo
Before reading on, decide if you would
Say you open 2ß with ßA-10-7-6-5-4
pass, double, or bid. If you pass or double,
and wind up in six spades facing the
what would you lead?
ßK-9 doubleton:
ßK 9
ßA 10 7 6 5 4
Krauss, who has been this route before, loses to the singleton jack or queen but wins
bid 7∂, got doubled and went for 800. He when fourth hand has a singleton 8, 3 or 2.
could have beaten 7ç, but he would have But the point of the diagram is this:
to lead a low heart to do it!
North
North ßK9
ß K Q J 10 7 4 3
˙K8 West (you) East
∂K764 ßQJ83 ß2
ç—
West (Don) East South
ßA ß98652 ß A 10 7 6 5 4
˙Q53 ˙J9764
∂ A Q J 10 9 8 5 3 2 ∂— If you are familiar with this combination,
ç— ç953
and you’re on defense, you should play the
South
ß— 8, not the 3, when South leads low. Sud-
˙ A 10 2 denly, you have presented declarer with a
∂— losing option (the reason behind all manda-
ç A K Q J 10 8 7 6 4 2 tory falsecards). If he assumes the 8 is from
shortness, perhaps a singleton, he must rise
If Don leads either ace (surely you didn’t with the king and run the 9. Surprise!
lead the ßA, thinking it would live, did
you?), declarer ruffs and uses the appropri- Here’s a similar one:
ate king for a heart discard. If Don leads
the ∂Q, say, declarer plays the king and North
overruffs East’s trump. Now come the KJ
onslaught of clubs and on the last one Don
West (you) East
is reduced to three cards. Two of them have
Q 10 8 3 2
to be aces to protect against the ßK and a
diamond in dummy. South
A97654
Dummy’s last four cards are a spade, a
diamond and the ˙K-8. So Don has to South needs five tricks and is about to
blank his ˙Q and now declarer leads a lead low to the jack, losing only to the
heart to the king and has a heart finesse for singleton queen (or Q-10-8-x with East,
the last two tricks. Only a heart lead on the which can’t be picked up anyway). How-
go prevents all this. Losing 800 is cheaper ever, a funny thing happens on the way to
than losing 2140, especially at the $$$$ the jack, if you play the 8! Again, South has
stakes they were playing for. a losing option if he decides that your play
is from shortness and rises with the king to
***** run the jack through a presumed Q-10-3-2
Solution to Card Combo in the East hand.
You have to make the best play to deal Would you like to see a couple of others?
with a 4-1 break, since a 3-2 break is irrel-
evant. The best play is low to the 9, which
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 8
South needs six tricks. He plays the ace, Say you are playing notrump and want to
needing to find the J-9 or K-J doubleton. If drive out the ace. Lead low to the king. If it
you play the 9, South has no choice but to holds, lead low to the jack. That is how
play the queen and hope you have J-9 would you play with J-10-x-x and is far
doubleton; K-9 doubleton will not help more likely to induce a good West player to
him. However, if as West you play the jack, take the ace. If you play low to the queen
South has a losing option. He may play the second time, you might as well be play-
your for K-J doubleton and lead low the ing with your cards face up, because you
second time. are telling the table that you have the jack,
and West has an easy duck.
And now a combination where the 8
saves the declarer:
Before and After
North (dummy)
J Did you see that caricature of me in the
West East
new ACBL Bulletin? Even Yvonne thinks
A973 Q 10 6 5 it’s scary. I sent an email to Paul Linxweiler
over at the Bulletin office in Memphis and
South (you) told him that she wants them to make me
K842 look less gaunt and take away some of my
wrinkles! He answered that I wasn’t the
The contract is notrump and East gets in only one who had complained and he
and attacks with the queen. If the idea is to would see what he could do. He signed his
avoid losing four tricks, play low. If East email Paul Linxweiler: Minister in Charge
continues with the 9 or 10, cover with the of Vanity Projects.
king and your 8 represents a stopper. If you
cover the queen with the king, the defense Flash: Just received a second email from
can take four tricks. And finally: Paul. “Eddie, the artist has diminished some
of the lines and wrinkles from your cartoon
(I thought it was a caricature). You look less
craggy and gaunt. The new you will appear
in the April issue. — Your plastic surgeon,
Paul.”
by Andrew Robson
The most recent Par Contest was held North’s 4˙ bid was a splinter in support
during the 1998 World Championships in of clubs. It was an overstatement with his
Lille, northern France. The world’s best minimum opener and it encouraged South,
bridge players had to solve very tough Bramley, to try for the grand slam. His 4NT
declarer play problems on a computer under bid was Roman Key Card Blackwood, and
time pressure. It was won by Michael the 5ß response showed two of the five aces
Rosenberg of the U.S. (though Scottish by and the queen of trumps.
birth). Second place went to Bart Bramley,
also of the U.S., who actually made fewer West led the ˙Q against 7ç and the
errors but took substantially more time to mediocre dummy was tabled. Bramley won
solve the devilish conundrums. the ˙A, trumped a heart, crossed to the
∂K, trumped another heart, cashed the
Here is Bramley capitalizing on a lucky çK-Q, crossed to the ßA and played his
layout to make an optimistic grand slam in three remaining trumps, discarding spades
a summer nationals. from dummy. On the last trump East was
forced to discard either the ˙K, which
North dealer North would make declarer’s ˙9 into the thir-
N-S vul ßJ754 teenth trick, or a diamond from the ∂J-10-
˙3 9, which would allow dummy’s ∂A-Q-7 to
∂AQ72 take the last three tricks. He was inexorably
çKQJ4
squeezed and Bramley’s grand slam was
West East
ß Q 10 9 8 6 ßK3 made.
˙QJ6 ˙ K 10 8 7 2
∂654 ∂ J 10 9 3 Notice that Bramley could have relied on
ç97 ç 10 5 a 4-3 diamond break and 2-2 club break
South (Bramley)
instead. He cashes three diamonds and ruffs
ßA2
˙A954 all of his hearts in dummy. Then he needs
∂K8 clubs to divide, which they did. Don’t ask
çA8632 me which is the better percentage line of
play — par contests are not my cup of tea!
West North East South
— 1∂ 1˙ 2ç
2˙ 4˙ pass 4 NT
pass 5ß pass 7ç
(all pass)
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 10
After reading about the Bridge Pro Tour each player at the table. Thirty-two pairs
Individuals here in Bridge Today I was qualified for the final, held at 9 a.m. Fri-
anxious to try one for myself. Until BPT day. Everyone who made it to the final won
came along individuals were few and far at least $100, which meant they broke even
between. I hadn’t played in one in over 20 after paying for their entry.
years. I thought I had a secret weapon,
knowing how to be nice to my partners. It Everyone used the ACBL Standard
turns out most of the contenders were good American Yellow Card, with fourth-best
at that. New York players are nicer than leads and Ace from Ace-King. There were
they used to be!* I prefer to think that it’s no alerts or announcements. No questions
because they realize that being pleasant is in or explanations were allowed, except for
their own best interest. Like Ayn Rand I “Whose lead is it?”
believe in the virtue of selfishness.**
The final was videotaped for a documen-
The entry fee was $100 per player ($90 if tary. When the camera was at my table for
paid in advance); 14 tables (56 players) the last two rounds I knew I must be doing
played two qualifying sessions Thursday well. I learned I had won shortly after
afternoon and evening. We played three- finishing the last round. This article will
board rounds, changing positions after each describe every hand from the final. I’ve
board so that we played one board with tried to compose a unique quiz to go with it.
It should help you answer the question:
“How would I have done if I’d played and
*As an ex-New Yorker, I take exception to this
had as much luck as the winner did?”
remark! — editor
**“The Virtue of Selfishness” is the title of a book of Most articles focus on the most interest-
essays by Ayn Rand and her associates. There Rand ing hands from an event. That's not a bad
explains one of the tenets of her philosophy, that the thing, but it doesn't always give a realistic
individual ought to be the primary beneficiary of his
own actions. This is in contrast to altruism, which
picture of a competition or the skills neces-
holds that one's life should be lived for others. sary to do well. Here I present every hand
from the final, good, bad, or indifferent.
Rand's philosophy may be controversial in life, but Call it bridge verité — I hope you'll enjoy it.
it ought not to be in bridge. Surely every participant
in an event is trying to win, otherwise what's the
point in playing? In fact intentionally advancing the
As in real life, your decision won’t always
interests of one's opponents is considered a serious make a difference. As in real life, you
breach of the ethics of the game. — A.W. should assume that it will! The quiz will
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 11
Virtual Scorecard
Partner deals and opens 1ß. You respond 5. Your are West, N-S vul:
1NT and partner rebids 2ß. What is your
next call? ßA
˙ 10 8 5 3 2
∂A965
ç762
I took my life into my hands to bid 2ß Partner took 10 tricks on a club lead, but
and my partner led a diamond! Declarer where was the redouble? That would net us
made the mistake of following with the 4 +960 with best defense (two overtricks), or
under my king, so I knew he held five of likely 760 in practice. Our score: 4
those. Accordingly, I switched to the ßQ. matchpoints.
Declarer covered this and now we took the
first eight tricks for +400. I’d have been Quiz: As South, what is your call over
happier to go +200 on the lead of the ßA 2ç-double?
and a low diamond switch. It’s also possible
that partner would switch to hearts if he Your score:
first led the ßA and we’d be +100. Our redouble = 6 matchpoints
score: 7 matchpoints. anything else = 4 matchpoints
Your score:
∂ or ç = a lucky 7 in this case
˙ = 6 (assume a heart continuation)
ß = 6 (assume a diamond switch)
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 16
Deal 9 North
Deal 8 North
South dealer ßA95
South dealer ß854
None vul ˙AQ4
All vul ˙AK52 ∂754
∂AK7 ç9854
ç974 East (you)
West (you) ßQ84
N
ßKJ7 W E ˙ 10 9 2
˙9763 N S
W E ∂KJ6
∂ 10 6 4 2 S ç J 10 3 2
çK6
South West North East
South West North East
1 NT pass 3 NT (all pass)
1ç pass 1˙ pass
1 NT pass 3 NT (all pass)
Partner leads the ˙8, the queen winning
in dummy. At trick two declarer calls for
You lead the ∂2, to the king, 3, 9. The the ∂4. What is your plan? What do you
ç4 is led to the 2, jack, king. You continue play on this trick?
dimaonds: ∂4, ace, 5, jack. The ç9 is led.
Partner covers with the queen, won by the
ace. Declarer leads the ß3. You put in the 10. You hold, at favorable:
jack and partner overtakes with the queen.
Then he leads the ∂8, won by South’s ß 10 6 5
queen. Declarer cashes the ç10 and you ˙ J 10
discard the thirteenth diamond. Partner ∂AQ743
ç642
follows with the 8. Now declarer plays the
ßA: Your RHO deals and opens 1˙. You
pass and LHO bids 1ß. Partner jumps to
3ç. RHO passes. What is your call?
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 17
I probably should not have overtaken Quiz: Which diamond do you play?
the ßJ. The unblock is easier to find if I
still have the ßQ, since declarer would Your score:
likely have taken the spade hook had he ∂K = 7
held that card. Our score: 7 matchpoints any other ∂ = 5* (see next page)
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 19
Your score:
*Footnote from previous page:
double = 7
Yes, you get lucky with 5 matchpoints for
-430. Four declarers made 460! This happened after pass = 5.5
a spade lead. Declarer won in dummy to finesse 3ç = 1
diamonds, returned to dummy for another finesse,
and on the run of diamonds and hearts, East dis-
carded a spade to hold three clubs (a mistake). Then
West was squeezed/endplayed.
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 20
Your score:
1. Draw trump, ruff out hearts, then
15. You hold, first seat, vul vs. not:
show-up squeeze if necessary, as at the table.
Score = 4.5 ß K 10 9 8 4 3
2. Try to ruff out hearts before drawing ˙K32
trump. This would fail against 5-1 hearts. ∂K9
Score = 4.5 ç86
3. Take a heart hook through West.
Do you pass or open 2ß?
Score = 0
4. Take a club hook through West. Score
= 4.5
5. Cash the top clubs, then take a heart
hook. Score = 0
6. Cash the top clubs, then play for a NOTE: You may have
squeeze. Score = 0 noticed that South is
declarer on every hand.
The hands were rotated
for ease of reading.
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 21
I led the ßK and we held it to 3. De- Partner led the ßQ and continued
clarer took two spades, one heart, five dia- spades. Declarer won the third spade, part-
monds and one club. Our score: 3.5 ner pitching the ˙10. Now declarer played
matchpoints. a club to dummy and ran the ˙8. Partner
returned the ∂2 and declarer hooked for
Quiz: What is your call over 1∂? down three, -150.
The board didn’t score as well as I’d 21. You are West on defense:
expected. One pair duplicated our result,
one went -130, and two our way managed North
+100 against 3NT with the ∂J lead. Our ß986
score: 3.5 matchpoints ˙AJ97
∂KQJ3
çK9
Quiz: What’s your call in third seat? West (you)
ß A K 10 2
Your score: ˙8 N
W E
pass = 3.5 ∂ 10 9 8 6 4 S
çJ72
anything else = 2.5
South West North East
2˙ pass 4˙ (all pass)
by Marshall Miles
23. You hold as West:
ß5
Imps North
˙ 10 8 6 5 4
∂ K 10 7 5 N-S vul ß A K 10 5
ç K 10 6 ˙652
∂7654
ç Q 10
West North East South
East (you)
— 1ß pass 2ç ßJ9862
N
pass 2∂ pass 3 NT ˙J W E ˙A984
S ∂K982
(all pass)
ç—
What is your opening lead?
South West North East
1NT* 3ç 3 NT (all pass)
*15-17
I led a normal heart. Declarer was able to I led a club and partner won the 9 with
unblock spades, go to dummy in hearts and ace and returned the suit. Declarer can
drive out the ßJ for nine tricks. We could make the contract if he wins in hand and
not take more than three clubs. A minor- leads a diamond up, ducking when I split.
suit lead would have beaten it. After two That would be a tough play even if he
rounds of clubs, for example, I can shift to could see through the backs of the cards. In
diamonds. Our score: 2.5 matchpoints real life, he won in dummy and in due
course went down one. Our score: 4
Quiz: You hold the West hand. What do matchpoints
you lead?
Quiz: Which suit do you lead?
Your score:
major = 2.5 Your score: It doesn’t matter which suit
minor = 6.5 you led — take 4 matchpoints.
* * *
Unusual Statistic I hope you enjoyed this play-by-play.
How did you do? — A.W.
Usually it pays to “hold the cards”
to determine your own fate. But in
this final session, the winner de-
fended 18 hands, was dummy on
four hands and declared only two
hands!
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 29
by Marshall Miles
The popularity of two-over-one game you might want to make not forcing after
forcing is due to the ease of bidding after your two-over-one.
two-over-one: You never have to worry
about what’s forcing and what’s not.
Ah, if life were always so simple! The 2-over-1 Check List Exceptions
problems with two-over-one begin when
responder doesn’t hold a game-force and A two-over-one is a game force, with the
must bid a forcing notrump or some other following exceptions (check the ones you
inventive call with a hand in which he want to play with your partner):
used to make a natural two-over-one. For
example, have you ever wrong-sided 3NT 1ß-2˙-2ß can be passed.
because you were forced to bid 1NT with- Responder’s rebid of his own suit at the three
out stoppers? level is not forcing.
You might easily play 3NT from the Example: 1ß-2ç; 2x-3ç nf
wrong side of the table when responder is
Responder’s rebid of opener’s first suit at the two
forced to respond 1NT with all 9-11 point level is not forcing, showing typically a doubleton
hands. honor.
Opening lead: ∂9
Solution
“Sometimes you’re cruising along without
a care in the world... Your chances are good if you play this
right. In fact, you have a one-hundred-
Trick one: ∂9, ace, 5, 3 percent chance.
Trick two: ˙2, 4, queen, king
Trick three: ∂8, king You have 11 sure tricks and West is
guarding the diamonds. If hearts are 3-3,
...when a tree jumps into the middle of the this hand wouldn’t be here. If East has four
road and you discover that you neglected to or more hearts, you have a double squeeze.
buckle your seatbelt! West held: Let’s look at this (turn to the next page,
ß J 8 ˙ K 10 ∂ Q 9 8 7 4 ç A 10 3 2. please):
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 33
You reached 6NT with no bidding by club to keep the ˙J and so your çK-J take
the opponents. the last two tricks.
ß—
The full hand was:
˙
∂ 10 6 North
ç7 ßKQ6
ß— ß— ˙A
˙— N ˙J ∂ Q J 10 6 5 4
∂98 W E ∂— ç765
S
ç? ç ?? West East
ß98 ß J 10 7 3 2
ß— ˙J972 ˙ 10 8
˙6 ∂98732 ∂A
∂— ç94 ç Q 10 8 3 2
çKJ South (Kit)
ßA54
Notice that West is down to two dia- ˙KQ6543
∂K
monds and, therefore, has been squeezed to
çAKJ
one club. On the ∂10 East must throw a
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 34
Between Sessions
Electronic Magazines
by the Granovetters
Sixteen years ago, when we first decided writer, contacted us from New York and
to go into the publishing business, and we suggested we set up a bridge website. With
were going to buy our first computer, Lapt’s help and the help of others the site
Matthew’s cousin suggested we purchase an became Bridgetoday.com.
Apple Macintosh, a crazy new computer
with a desktop laser printer and A few years ago, our rep at the printing
a thing called a mouse. We took press we used in upstate New York sug-
his advice and published our gested we try emailing the entire magazine
first book, Tops & Bottoms. to him instead of the old-fashioned way of
Then we started Bridge Today printing it on a laser printer and using
Magazine and suddenly found ourselves in express mail. We tried it. It took awhile but
the forefront of the new-age technology. it got there in an hour or so. Wow! We still
We didn’t know anything about this tech- waited for proofs sent through the post
nology, but it was easy and fun to use! office, however. Soon we stopped this pro-
cess as well, when our printer decided to
A few years later when we were in our send us proofs through a thing called the
third year of Bridge Today Magazine, our “pdf” file.
friend (who passed away a year ago), Phil
deBourbon, phoned us and insisted we buy In the meantime, unfortunately, bridge
a “fax machine.” Well, this seemed a bit players were leaving bridge or (worse) pass-
luxurious, but we took his advice and with ing away (we recently read that more than
that entered the so-called modern age of 1,000 ACBL members are lost each month!),
communications. Wow, our writers could paper prices were going up, and U.S. mail-
fax their columns to us instead of using the ing costs were skyrocketing. It had become
mail! more efficient to make Bridge Today but
more costly to produce it. So we ventured
Two years later, Matthew was speaking to into other areas of publishing, which had
BT subscriber Marty Seligman about this, less of an overhead, such as Email Bridge
and he said it was time we entered the Courses and a twice-a-week Bridge Today
world of the Internet, a newfangled world Digest-Online, which arrives by email or
of electrons, wherein we could send and pdf attachment.
receive articles and letters cheaply via a
modem. We took his advice and tried it. It A year ago, we met with Cliff Meltzer, a
was great! We bought a modem and after a former bridge club owner who moved to
year or so, very few writers were sending Silicon Valley a few years ago with his wife
their columns by fax. We were completely Rose, to work in the computer industry.
immersed in the e-mail mode of thinking Cliff’s vision is another electronic step
and working. Then Lapt Chan, a software forward: a website that teaches bridge to
Bridge Today • May 2003 page 35