Project-Decentralization: Rajni Kothari in Political Economy of Indian State, Argued That Substantive

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Project- Decentralization

The process of decentralization should not be understood as contradictory to


centralization. The process has evolved over the years. It is different from
delegation. Decentralization and integration are two sides of same coin. Without
integration and co-ordination, decentralization will become less efficient and
will contribute little to good governance.

Rajni kothari in Political Economy of Indian State, argued that substantive


democracy needed redrawing of the federal structure and certain autonomy to
the local government. People’s centred approach to sorting out local level
problems was significant and people should be located at the centre of
participation.

Thus it can be said that; Decentralization can overcome the several limitations
of the hierarchically structured procedures of admin. and centrally controlled
national planning. It reduces red-tapism, bring local population closer to the
government.

Approaches:

The 4 approaches to understand decentralization that are explained by ‘Fesler’


are-

1)The Doctrinal Approach

2) The political Approach

3)Administrative Approach

4) Dual Role Approach

Types of decentralization:

There are different aspects of power, authority, structures, functions and fiscal
responsibilities that are decentralized.

Structural and Functional Decentralization

Democratic Decentralization

Political Decentralization
Financial Decentralization

Local self governance:

Panchayati Raj Institutions are the institutionalized pan-Indian form of rural


local governance that came into existence with the passage of the 73rd
Constitution Amendment Act, 1992. It enjoy a substantial amount of autonomy
in terms of origination functions, and finance bestowed upon by the
constitution. In the post- colonial period the Balwantrai Mehta Committee
1957. The committee had recommended a three-tier system of rural local
government, that is, village Panchayats at the village level, the Panchayat Samiti
at the intermediate level, and Zilla Parishad at the district level, with Panchayat
Samitis being the most effective body. However, the Balwantrai Mehta
Committee report failed to rejuvenate panchayats as the institutions of local
governance.

Ashok Mehta Committee (1978) felt that a combination of factors had conspired
to undermine Panchayati Raj Institutions, such as an unsympathetic
bureaucracy, absence of political will, lack of involvement in planning and
implementation on a substantial scale, and the domination of local institutions
by the economic and social rural elite. The Ashok Mehta Committee was the
first to demand constitutional recognition for Panchyats.
Rural local Government:
Unlike rural governance, urban governance is not hierarchical. Article 243Q of
the 74th Amendment Act, 1992 (came in force in 1993), stipulates that there
shall be three types of urban local bodies in India, namely, the Nagar
Panchayat, for the transitional areas; municipal councils or
municipalities for smaller urban areas; and municipal corporations for
larger urban areas. State governments are allowed to design their own
municipal acts in accordance with the broad parameters outlined in the 74th
Amendment Act. The act thus, gives a constitutional status to the
municipalities. It seeks to redefine their role, power, function, and finances.
This has ushered in a new era of urban governance and urbanmanagement in
India.
Conclusion: Decentralization can thus be identified as one of the important
prerequisites of good governance. From a totalitarian regime to one of
professed democratic system, all seem to have taken refuge behind this
capacious term.

You might also like