Birth Certificate Bond

When the transferee receives an instrument issued and transferred for value, he
has options. He can 1) accept it and pay it, 2) refuse it for cause and return it, or 3)
accept it for value and return it as payment. The transferee gets an implied security
interest (consideration) that he can enforce against the security the issuer is supposed
to be passing on to the transferee. By operation of law, the instrument must carry the
issuer’s obligation to pay it.

UCC 3-303 Official Comment

If an instrument is not issued for consideration the issuer has a defense to the
obligation to pay the instrument.
UCC 3-303 Official Comment
Thus, outside Article 3, anything that is consideration is also value. A different
rule applies in Article 3. Subsection (b) of Section 3-303 states that if an
instrument is issued for value it is also issued for consideration.

To avoid fraud, the instrument has to be issued for value. It gives the transferee a security interest in the
instrument. The only piece of paper a man has the is proof of the security interest he has is the birth
certificate. It has no value on the private side, but it does on the public side if he deposits with an
appropriate banker, who can then be the man’s securities intermediary, and the man can be the
entitlement holder. This is explained in UCC Article 8 in the 500 series. The following insert is taken from
Wikipedia, an online dictionary.

Operation of law - The phrase "by operation of law" is a legal term that
indicates that a right or liability has been created for a party, irrespective of
the intent of that party, because it is dictated by existing legal principles. …
Events that occur by operation of law do so because courts have determined
over time that the rights thus created or transferred represent what the intent of
the party would have been, had they thought about the situation in advance; or
because the results fulfilled the settled expectations of parties with respect to
their property; or because legal instruments of title provide for these transfers
to occur automatically on certain named contingencies.
Rights that arise by operation of law often arise by design of certain
contingencies set forth in a legal instrument.

Rights or liabilities created by operation of law can also be created

involuntarily, because a contingency occurs for which a party has failed to
plan (e.g. failure to write a will); or because a specific condition exists for a set
period of time (e.g. adverse possession of property or creation of an easement;
failure of a court to rule on a motion within a certain period automatically
defeating the motion; failure of a party to act on a filed complaint within a
certain time causing dismissal of the case); or because an existing legal
relationship is invalidated, but the parties to that relationship still require a
mechanism to distribute their rights (e.g. under the Uniform Commercial Code,
where a contract for which both parties have performed partially is voided the
court will create a new contract based on the performance that has actually
been rendered and containing reasonable terms to accommodate the
expectations of the parties).

Because title to property that arises by operation of law is usually contingent

upon proof of certain contingencies, and title records may not contain evidence
of those contingencies, legal proceedings are sometimes required to turn title
that arises by operation of law into marketable title.

Your Order that the birth certificate be deposited by a securities intermediary

makes it a security. It appears that the birth certificate is not an actual security until it
passes to a second holder, ie. from the issuer (State of ___) to the Department of
Commerce of the United States. The United States uses the certificate until you
decide you want to use it. You have the priority right to it as a security for the
obligation the United States has to you. It was issued to you.

UCC 8-102(a)(15) “Security,” except as otherwise provided in Section 8-103,

means an obligation of an issuer or a share, participation, or other interest in
an issuer or in property or an enterprise of an issuer:
(i) which is represented by a security certificate in bearer or registered form,
or the transfer of which may be registered upon books maintained for that
purpose by or on behalf of the issuer;
(ii) which is one of a class or series or by its terms is divisible into a class or
series of shares, participation, interests, or obligations; and
(iii) which:
(A) is, or is of a type, dealt in or traded on securities exchanges or
securities markets; or
(B) is a medium for investment and by its terms expressly provides that it
is a security governed by this Article.

Depositing the birth certificate (security) makes the secretary of the treasury a
securities intermediary.

UCC 8-102(a)(14) “Securities intermediary” means

(i) a clearing corporation: or
(ii) a person, including a bank or broker, that in the ordinary course of its
business maintains securities accounts for others and is acting in that
capacity.

He is holding something of value (a financial asset = birth certificate = security)

in a securities account for you.

UCC 8-501
(a) “Securities account” means an account to which a financial asset is or
may be credited in accordance with an agreement under which the person
maintaining the account undertakes to treat the person for whom the
account is maintained as entitled to exercise the rights that comprise the
financial asset.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) and (e), a person acquires a
security entitlement if a securities intermediary:
(1) indicates by book entry that a financial asset has been credited to the
person’s securities account;
(2) receives a financial asset from the person or acquires a financial asset
for the person and, in either case, accepts it for credit to the person’s
securities account; or
(3) becomes obligated under other law, regulation, or rule to credit a
financial asset to the person’s securities account.

His acceptance of your financial asset makes you an entitlement holder with a
securities entitlement.

UCC 8-102(a)(9) “Financial asset,” except as otherwise provided in Section

8-103, means:
(i) a security;
(ii) an obligation of a person or a share, participation, or other interest in a
person or in property or an enterprise of a person, which is, or is of a type,
dealt in or traded on financial markets, or which is recognized in any area
in which it is issued or dealt in as a medium for investment; or
(iii) any property that is held by a securities intermediary for another person in
a securities account if the securities intermediary has expressly agreed
with the other person that the property is to be treated as a financial asset
under this Article.

UCC 8-102(a)(17) “Security entitlement” means the rights and property

interest of an entitlement holder with respect to a financial asset specified in
Part 5.

UCC 8-102(a)(7) “Entitlement holder” means a person identified in the

records of a securities intermediary as the person having a security entitlement
against the securities intermediary.

Official Comment
Because many of the rules of Part 5 impose duties on securities intermediaries
in favor of entitlement holders, the definition of entitlement holder is, in most
cases, limited to the person specifically designated as such on the records of
the intermediary. The last sentence of the definition covers the relatively
unusual cases where a person may acquire a security entitlement under Section
8-501 even though the person may not be specifically designated as an
entitlement holder on the records of the securities intermediary.

You can give him another bond written against the security (bond = birth
certificate) he is holding. A promissory note can be written against the bond that is
written against the security. Such a promissory note would be an order from the
entitlement holder to the securities intermediary to use the security he is maintaining
for a specific purpose.

UCC 8-102(a)(8) “Entitlement order ” means a notification communicated to

a securities intermediary directing transfer or redemption of a financial asset
to which the entitlement holder has a security entitlement.

UCC 8-505. Duty of Securities Intermediary with Respect to Payments and

Distributions.
(a) a securities intermediary shall take action to obtain a payment or
distribution made by the issuer of a financial asset. A securities intermediary
satisfies the duty if:
(1) the securities intermediary acts with respect to the duty as agreed upon
by the entitlement holder and the securities intermediary; or
(2) in the absence of agreement, the securities intermediary exercises due
care in accordance with reasonable commercial standards to attempt to
obtain the payment or distribution.
(b) A securities intermediary is obligated to its entitlement holder for a
payment or distribution made by the issuer of a financial asset if the payment
or distribution is received by the securities intermediary.

Since securities intermediaries have obligations to entitlement holders, the

securities intermediaries must have capacity to act. That is done under the premise
that a securities intermediary is declared in the commercial code to be a purchaser for
value. The indirect holding system of the United States would not function as
expected if the securities intermediary did not have capacity to act. Without the rights
of an owner or a purchaser, the securities intermediary would be powerless to act in
the intended manner.

UCC 8-116 ~ Securities Intermediary as Purchaser For Value

A securities intermediary that receives a financial asset and establishes a
security entitlement to the financial asset in favor of an entitlement holder is a
purchaser for value of the financial asset.
Official Comment
This section is intended to make explicit two points that, which implicit in other
provisions, are of sufficient importance to the operation of the indirect holding
system that they warrant explicit statement.
First, it makes clear that a securities intermediary that receives a financial
asset and establishes a security entitlement in respect thereof in favor of an
entitlement holder is a “purchaser” of the financial asset that the securities
intermediary received.
Second, it makes clear that by establishing a security entitlement in favor of an
entitlement holder a securities intermediary gives value for any corresponding
financial asset that the securities intermediary receives or acquires from
another party, whether the intermediary holds directly or indirectly.
…
In many cases a securities intermediary that receives a financial asset will also
be transferring value to the person from whom the financial asset was received.
That, however, is not always the case.
Payment may occur through a different system than settlement of the securities
side of the transaction, or the securities might be transferred without a
corresponding payment, as when a person moves an account from one
securities intermediary to another.
Even though the securities intermediary does not give value to the transferor, it
does give value by incurring obligations to its own entitlement holder.
Although the general definition of value in Section 1-201(44)(d) should be
interpreted to cover the point, this section is included to make this point
explicit.

If the transferee actually is a party to a preexisting contract, he must pay it or

refuse it for cause, due to some defect in the collection process. Even if he is
presumed to be a party to a preexisting contract, he has the option of renegotiating the
terms of that contract, or introducing a new contract. If he just accepts the instrument
and does not timely 1) pay it or 2) refuse it for cause and return it, he is in default.
The reason he can refuse it for cause and return might be that there is some doubt as
to whether the transferee is actually liable for an antecedent claim on a preexisting contract. There is also
some doubt that the proper procedures were used to transfer the debt to the transferee.
Option 1 requires the transferee to part with possessions, such as cash, digits in a
bank account, or titles to things. Option 2 requires the transferee to understand a
great deal about court procedures and the ability to think on his feet if he participates
in a court proceeding. Option 2 is very useful to those who have learned the
mechanics of the administrative courts. It is also useful if the transferee starts an
immediate dialogue with the issuer as soon as the instrument is delivered. The focus
for this option must be on due process. It cannot present arguments about the
existence of the obligation or the amount of the obligation, but can present questions
about proper collection procedures. Option 3 requires knowledge of who you are and
how to enforce your rights.

The issuance of an instrument with nothing to base it on, normally would be a

violation of commercial principles and would be fraud, but under Article 3, an
instrument can be issued for value to avoid the normal penalty for fraud. It is the
transferee’s choice as to how it will all turn out. He determines if the instrument is a
promise or an order, if it is negotiable or non-negotiable, and if it is a payment or a
security for an antecedent claim he has against the issuer, or if it is a security for an
antecedent claim the issuer has against him. His endorsement will inform the issuer
of what he intends to do. He has the option of accepting it for value and settling the
account to close the books. He can even send an additional promissory note with the
return of the instrument he has accepted for value. It would not hurt for him to do this, so the United States
does not suffer because of the actions of one of its agents. If he refuses the instrument for cause and returns
it, it is possible one of those agents will cause the United States to suffer a financial loss. It might be better
to be seen as one who aids and assists the United States in its time of emergency, rather than one
who does not.

Subsection 3 of 3-303 deals with options the transferee has when an instrument is
issued for value and transferred for value to him.

UCC 3-303. Value and consideration

A. An instrument is issued or transferred for value if:
3. The instrument is issued or transferred as payment of, or as security for, an
antecedent claim against any person, whether or not the claim is due;

UCC 3-303 says an instrument is issued or transferred for value if it is issued or

transferred 1) as if it were a payment of, or 2) as if it were a security for, an
antecedent claim against any person; and it does not matter if the claim is due. The
“antecedent claim against any person” can be and usually is, the claim international
lenders have against the United States. U.S. citizens are sureties for that debt, and the
United States is the principal. When a surety is called upon to pay his principal’s
debt, a demand for payment has already been made of the principal. For whatever
reason the principal did not pay when the demand was made, so the attention then
turns to the sureties. The sureties are required to pay immediately. Since U.S.
citizens have not expressly signed on as sureties for the United States, demand can
only be made for value. The United States acting for its creditors, can make demands
for value, ie. for loans. When the surety (transferee) receives a demand for value, the
demand needs an endorsement to make it negotiable. The issuer is looking for the
transferee to supply the endorsement. That can be a blank endorsement or a qualified
endorsement. The choice is yours.

The instrument can be issued or transferred for value as a payment or as a

security. The endorser decides which it is. The antecedent claim can be against any
person, not necessarily against the transferee. That “any person” can be the United
States for the national debt if the transferee is a surety for the United States. If the
transferee agrees to be surety, he has an obligation to pay the instrument immediately.
If the transferee gives the instrument to the man who represents him, he can use the
commercial rules to A4V the instrument and return it for value and for closure of the
account. Either way, the transferee has an obligation to do something with the
instrument.

“Giving value” from 1-201 is not the same as “transferring for value” from 3-303.
The transferor (issuer) in 303 usually wants to get a valuable consideration back for
an instrument he issues for value, and he wants a new contract on which he or the
person he represents is the creditor. An issuer for value has no preexisting contract
and no antecedent claim that authorizes him to issue an instrument, so he issues it for
value and delivers it to someone (the target) with the hope that the receiver will
accept it without conditions. The one who receives an instrument issued for value
does not have to accept the liability attached to it, unless he has an obligation to accept the liability. If there
is no obligation, the transferee can view the instrument as
a payment, and return it with a proper endorsement to pay the instrument and to close
the account. The instrument pays the instrument! The issuer pays the issuer!
Confusing, isn’t it?
The instrument can also be an offer to contract, and no one is required to contract
if he does not choose to do so. The presumption that everyone is obligated to enter
these contracts is based on an implied simple contract. That is not a very strong
position.

When an instrument issued for value is received and retained, it is accepted as

though the receiver has given it a blank endorsement, and the transfer of liability has
been successful. A blank endorsement waives all the defects, and the main defect in
an instrument issued for value is that there is no security attached to it. If it were not
for the inherent security interest in the instrument itself, the whole project would be
fraud. The issuer is not giving value; he is seeking value. The issuer is not giving
consideration; he is seeking consideration. These abnormalities can be cured if the
transferee gives it a qualified endorsement as a payment and returns the payment for
closure of the account. After acceptance through a blank endorsement, the issuer’s
consideration is presumed, and the endorser is liable on the instrument. A
commitment (implied or express) by the transferee (to take on the liability) through a
general acceptance would be a valuable consideration on his part, and would result in
a binding contract. He is then obligated on the instrument to make immediate
payment.

Subsection 4 of 3-303 deals with negotiable instruments. The issuer is seeking a

negotiable instrument in return for the instrument he is transferring to the transferee.
In most cases, the transferee does not know that the instrument itself is going to be
made negotiable. The transferee is the only one who can decide what endorsement is
going to be one the instrument.

UCC 3-303. Value and consideration

A. An instrument is issued or transferred for value if:
4. The instrument is issued or transferred in exchange for a negotiable
instrument; or
UCC 3-303(A)(4) says an instrument is issued or transferred for value if it is
issued or transferred in exchange for a negotiable instrument. The issuer wants to
exchange his instrument for a negotiable instrument. You can send him a check,
which is negotiable. You can retain his instrument, which is an acceptance waiving
the defects and giving it a blank endorsement, which makes the instrument negotiable.
You can return his instrument as a payment with a proper endorsement, which makes
it negotiable. The issuer gets what he wants, sort of.

Hopefully this will help you all understand. There is much more and if you would like to read the full text
please do not hesitate to e-mail me with a request.

As always without prejudice, vexation, or frivolity,

FOR: ALLEN BOISJOLI™

By:

Allen Nelson Boisjoli©

Divinus Partum, Deus Genus, Sovereign, Freewill Man, Secured Party, Creditor
Not in any federal zone, state, province, corporate municipality, or any other territory, abode, enclave, domicile, dwelling, residence, et al., implied or expressed.
Not subject to, or in accordance with, the jurisdiction of Canada, Crown, Queen, Commonwealth, United States, District of Columbia, City of London, Vatican, or any derivatives,
agents/agencies, possessions or subsidiaries thereof; disclosed or undisclosed, released or unreleased, attached or unattached.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ADMINISTRATOR/AGENT FOR:

ALLEN BOISJOLI dba ALLEN BOISJOLI HOLDINGS,

TIEL BOISJOLI, SETH BOISJOLI, BOISJOLI CONSTRUCTION, COMPUTER DYNAMICS, OFF THE GRIDD, (THE SCENE) SOVEREIGN COALITION OF
EXEMPT NON-COMERCIAL ENTITIES™
Return Correspondence to:
Allen Nelson Boisjoli©
c/o ALLEN BOISJOLI HOLDINGS
1-12959-97St., Edmonton, Alberta
[T5E 4C2] non-domestic
E-mail: aboisjoli@hotmail.com