RunolaJenni PDF
RunolaJenni PDF
RunolaJenni PDF
2013
Jenni Runola
EMPLOYEE INDUCTION
– developing an induction process for a company
providing services in sports and leisure time
activities
BACHELOR´S THESIS | ABSTRACT
TURKU UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
2013 | 47
Nicolas LeGrand
Jenni Runola
EMPLOYEE INDUCTION
This thesis is created by the order of a company in Turku region offering a wide range of leisure
time and sports services. The work aims at addressing 1) What are the expected outputs of an
induction process? 2) Why is induction especially important at the case company? 3) What
should be included in an induction process for the case company? The first question will be
answered by the literature review and the latter questions will be discussed in the research part.
Additionally the study has provided valuable data related to other areas of human resource
management, such as leadership.
The research methods used in this study were participant observation and semi-structured
interviews. The objective was to gather reliable data about the current situation and needs
about the company’s induction process.
It is often the quality of service that has a significant impact on the purchase decision. Trained
employees perform better and are more likely to serve customers in a desired way. Thus one of
the objectives of an induction process is to increase customer satisfaction through minimizing
errors and raising employee performance. Systematic induction process also aims at increasing
employee commitment and this way improving motivation. The first day in a new job is always
memorable – in good or bad. Induction often reflects the values of a company. It can be
suggested that a company can strengthen its competitive advantage and decrease the
employee turnover by investing in employee training since the beginning of the employment
with a proper employee induction.
The service range offered by the case company is wide and the company aims at aggressive
growth. Thus the amount of information to adapt to is large and training is essential. For this
reason improving the induction practices is important. Crucially, the induction program of the
case company should create a clear image of the case company’s operational environment,
which highlights company values.
Regarding the future, this study suggests the following themes to be researched. How should
the induction practices be developed to meet the needs of the part-time employees? Why is
human resource management especially important at the case company and what kind of HR
strategies should the case company execute?
KEYWORDS:
2013 | 47
Nicolas LeGrand
Jenni Runola
TYÖNTEKIJÄN PEREHDYTYS
ASIASANAT:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6
1 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 Company introduction and research objectives 7
1.1.1 Phases of organizational growth 10
1.2 SWOT analysis of the case company 13
1.3 Major challenges of the case company’s cafeteria / reception 14
2 OBJECTIVES OF INDUCTION 15
2.1 Induction and employee satisfaction 16
2.2 Induction and performance management 17
2.3 Induction and customer satisfaction 18
2.4 Induction in practice 19
3 RESEARCH METHODS 23
3.1 Data collection process 23
3.1.1 Participant observation 23
3.1.2 Semi-structured interviews 24
3.1.3 Reliability, validity and limitations 26
4 DATA ANALYSIS 30
4.1 The importance of induction at the case company 31
4.1.1 Employee & customer satisfaction 31
4.1.2 Performance management 33
4.2 Practical perspectives for an induction process at the case company 35
4.2.1 An ideal induction programme 38
4.3 Other findings 42
5 CONCLUSIONS 43
SOURCE MATERIAL 46
APPENDICES
PICTURES
Picture 1. Organizational chart of the case company (Retelling Jones, 2010, 43) ......... 7
Picture 2. “The Greiner Curve” on organizational growth (Retelling: Clarke 1994,12) . 11
Picture 3. Induction emphasizes the general view (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010, 203)..... 22
TABLES
1 INTRODUCTION
The idea for my thesis developed along with my studies and my practical
training. Since the beginning of my studies, I have been very interested in
Human Resources, especially in leadership. In my practical training, the
importance of internal communication and leadership was highlighted, as our
manager was very aware of the effects of the internal communication and
leadership on employees and customer satisfaction. The induction process was
also well planned and executed. This has definitely had an effect on my
decision to do the thesis about induction.
This thesis is created by the order of a company in Turku region that offers wide
range of leisure time and sports services. Based on my own work experience,
the aim of this thesis is to address 1) why induction is an important part of
human resources, 2) how it can be done effectively and 3) what are the tools for
an induction process. All these elements are researched in the case company.
In addition, other possible development areas related to induction and
management of human resources will be discussed. The case company wished
that I would create an induction folder, however the contents and the scope of
such a folder were unclear. The scope and implementation of the induction
process as well as the contents for a possible induction manual were
researched through semi-structured interviews of the case company
employees, managers and shareholders.
The literature review of this thesis covers the following topics; the significance of
induction for an organization, how induction affects motivation and how
induction should be executed in practice. Because the case company in
question is Finnish, a significant part of the literature used in this thesis is
Finnish. The examples and practices explained in the Finnish literature best
matches the situation of the ordering company.
Picture 1. Organizational chart of the case company (Retelling Jones, 2010, 43)
This thesis tackles the challenges of the induction process at the cafeteria,
because the lack of proper induction process is a challenge, as it is the
reception for each of the service the company offers. It is the place where all of
the customers come first, regardless of which services they are looking for. This
is what makes the work of the employees at the cafeteria / reception
demanding; one must be aware of each service the company offers and guide
the customers professionally. During the rush hours the work at the cafeteria is
very hectic. For example on a busy weekend most of the services are being
used which places pressure on the cafeteria employees; there is a floor ball
tournament of 17 teams, the children’s playing arena is busy with customers,
there are children’s birthday parties, and the sauna and conference facilities
might be booked as well. All of the customer services related to these activities
are handled at the cafeteria; payment, cafeteria / restaurant services,
reservations and general inquiries. This means that the cafeteria employees are
required to handle various different tasks and without a proper induction it is
impossible.
In addition, there are many customers calling the cafeteria; most of these calls
are missed. The employees at the cafeteria must also deal with issues that
belong to other service areas, such as billing issues and gym contract terms.
The service manager who is responsible for invoicing is usually available to the
customers only during the office hours. This is why customers will have to
contact the cafeteria regarding invoicing when the service manager is not
around. In this case the cafeteria employee must know how to handle it or at
least to whom to delegate the issue so that the information reaches the right
person. With the lack of proper understanding of roles and without a functional
internal communication system it is challenging and threatens to affect
customer satisfaction.
In 2011, the company opened up a new gym and the possibility to exercise
group gymnastics. Many new employees were hired with various different tasks
because of this development. On the other hand, this development made the
organization more complex. Even if there are new employees to cut down the
At the moment the job descriptions and roles in the organization are blurred and
there is a lack of understanding of who is in charge of each task. For instance,
there is no one clearly in charge of the cafeteria’s induction process which is
one of the reasons why it is being neglected. The company has not set clear
values and vision, which hinders the orientation process of the newcomer in the
case company as the goal is not concrete. All of these above mentioned issues
hinder the organization from developing and renewing and it creates a high risk
of not being able to deliver quality customer service.
The first question will be covered within the literature review of this work and the
latter questions will be addressed in the research part.
The model suggests that in the first phase there are only a few people working
in the company and it is easy to share the information and allocate tasks. All
relevant issues are mostly shared by word of mouth. In the first phase a crisis of
leadership is likely to occur: as the number of employees increases, it is
challenging to separate the essential issues from the unessential. As there are
very little organizational structures and roles the allocation of work to certain
people is difficult.
In the third phase the middle level management has the authority to react
independently in new opportunities so the organization continues to grow while
top management is mainly concentrating on the big picture. The crisis point of
this phase is control which emphasizes the need for the separate units of a
company to work together.
Phase four suggests that the business units that in the previous phase were
isolated are now reorganized. This phase also includes the creation of reward
systems aligned with the corporate goals. The challenge in this phase is the red
tape as a new structure is introduced.
In the last, fifth, phase the growth occurs through alliances, which means that
the departments work flexibly together and growth is achieved. The crisis point
of this phase is the internal growth which deals with the possibilities of further
growth. (Camillus 1986, 27; Recklies 2001)
Based on the observations done in the case company, the case organization is
now in between of phase 1 and phase 2. This observation, however, does not
support the argument of the Greiner’s theory of organizational growth that the
different stages would be clearly separated from one another (Camillus 1986,
26). Crisis of leadership definitely occurs in the case company, as the roles and
responsibility areas of the employees are unclear. Some of the employees have
also demonstrated that there has been a dramatic change since the company
was founded; in the beginning it was easy to communicate and keep the roles
clear as there were only a few employees and each had their own clear tasks.
For that matter, as the company has grown, it needs now to become more
structured; a well-organized and clear induction process is a part of that. An
autonomy crisis can be identified as well. The cafeteria manager clearly has a
large workload and the tasks should be reallocated or shared with the staff.
Because of these two crisis points, it is important to pay attention to employee
training and development. In the case company a preferable starting point for
this is to develop an induction program, which is likely to solve current problems
and development needs.
change due to the uncertainty and unawareness of what the future will be like. It
is also questionable if all people can keep up with change and development. In
the case company for example, especially for older employees it has been
challenging to keep up with the development of IT systems. This is why it is
important that the company is well prepared to train employees constantly, not
only in terms of induction.
However the vast customer segment and wide service range create also threats
and weaknesses. From employee training perspective, it is a great challenge for
being able to handle each service range and to deliver quality customer service
for a huge segment of different kinds of customers. This problem can be already
identified in the case company. The employees are not enough trained to be
able to keep up with the amount of information that is needed, especially at the
cafeteria. The challenges identified in the cafeteria will be further discussed in
the next chapter. Unless the case company starts to pay attention to this matter,
it will pose a threat for the future. The case company aims at a high growth and
developing their services further, which highlights the importance of employee
training even more. The large investments made in developing their services
will lose their value unless the staff is able to keep up with what is going on. In
addition to the gym services, the company should pay attention to developing
their various other services as well.
The next chapter of this thesis will discuss the objectives of an induction
process; why induction is important to the organization, how it affects employee
motivation and customer satisfaction and how it should be implemented in
practice. The third chapter will discuss how the theories are actualized in the
case company providing suggestions for implementing the induction process. In
the last chapter suggestions for further development ideas and future research
topics will be provided.
2 OBJECTIVES OF INDUCTION
Kupias and Peltola (2009, 18) define induction as the processes and support
provided by the organization in order to help a new employee to learn to know
the new organization and its members as well as the expectations and tasks
related to the job. In other words, induction is the process of helping the new
employee to become an efficient and productive member of the organization as
soon as possible by minimizing errors and simultaneously avoiding the costs of
employee turnover by giving them a good first impression of the company. A
well conducted induction communicates to the employee that the company
values and cares about him or her. A proper induction decreases the amount of
mistakes and accidents at work and improves the quality of work as well as
customer satisfaction. (KT Kuntatyönantajat, 2011)
Foot and Hook (1999, 202) present induction as an important aspect of the
employee retention as it is the first process the new employee faces and the
way induction is managed often reflects the values of a company. Paying
special attention to the first impression made by the company will make the new
employee feel valued and expected (Great Place to Work, 2012). A well
planned induction process also affects the public image of a company as the
employees might discuss the success of an induction process with other people
(Foot and Hook 2008, 293). Dessler (2013, 270) points out four main purposes
of employee orientation: 1. to make the new employee feel welcomed, 2.
provide one with basic information to function effectively, 3. to understand the
organization in its broad sense and 4. to familiarize one with the organization’s
cultures and values. It is also pointed out that the latter two purposes distinguish
onboarding from traditional orientation.
There are many issues that can be affected through a proper induction, such as
the quality and effectiveness of work, atmosphere, labor costs and employee
turnover. Company’s values, vision and strategy are the starting point of the
induction as well as the objective of it. The process of induction starts from the
recruiting phase of the new employee(s). The actual ending point of the
induction is difficult to define because the process should be viewed as a
Sinikka Leino from Turku University of Applied Sciences claims that many
organizations consider recruiting to be more important than induction and thus
the induction process is often neglected. However it should be acknowledged
that investing in recruiting will not pay off if the employee will not be committed
through the induction process. (Turun Sanomat 2008.) Induction is often carried
out during the work routines and many organizations assert that “you learn the
best by doing”. It is also very common when hiring an already experienced
employee the induction process is assumed to be less important. (Kupias and
Peltola 2009, 19; Kjelin and Kuusisto 2003, 9; Armstrong 1999, 406; Foot and
Hook 1999, 202)
Kjelin and Kuusisto (2003, 20 – 22) stress that a weak induction process affects
the company’s credibility not only externally but also internally. Well motivated
employees have the energy to be productive and provide quality service. If the
company management is not committed to deliver an effective induction
process, the motivation levels of the employees can decrease. This might not
occur straight after starting a new job, as the new employees usually are eager
to prove themselves. Employees are usually highly motivated when starting a
job and a poor induction might impair the motivation in early stages. The
abovementioned issue is also observed in the case company; for the first few
months the new employees have a high level of motivation, which then
gradually decreases due to the several challenges in the organization. Based
on the observations made during the research, the diminishing motivation of the
employees occurs mostly because human resource management is to a large
extent neglected in the case company and the company management is not
aware of the practical challenges. If the employees consistently need to lower
their own quality standards, it hinders their work commitment and thus
decreases the quality of customer service. Most of the interviewees agreed that
the company management should be more aware of the practical work done in
the cafeteria in order to be able to manage it better. As the commitment of an
employee is weak, there is a risk of high employee turn-over. This creates
immediate costs as constant recruitments and training new employees
consume a significant amount of a company’s resources. Profound induction
saves recruitment costs by increasing the employee commitment; the employee
turnover decreases and motivation towards delivering high quality service
increases. In addition the labor costs can be decreased, because well trained
employees work more efficiently. (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2003, 20 – 22)
Torrington et al. (2011, 251-252) claim that human resource practices improve
performance through influencing employees’ attitudes. Committed employees
are the ultimate goal of human resource management because it results in high
motivation and eventually committed employees will reduce employee turnover
and absence costs.
Bratton and Gold (2003, 288 – 289) quote a theory by Purcell and Boxall (2003)
that views performance as the outcome of ability, motivation and opportunity.
According to the theory, ability is seen as the necessary knowledge and skills
which are effected by recruitment, selection and training. An important part of
this ability is already being created in the beginning of the employment within
induction. High performance levels can be achieved with motivated employees.
There is a lot of debate around monetary rewards and how much money
actually motivates people in their work. Money is seen as a very limited source
of motivation, especially in the long term. Herzberg’s statement (1966) quoted
by Bratton and Gold stipulate that a monetary reward only motivates when it is
considered as recognition. It is suggested that the way employees are treated
may in fact boost productivity more than salary. (Bratton and Gold 2003, 288 –
289) Opportunity refers to the organization encouraging the employees to take
initiative and to develop their skills and to influence decision making regarding
their own jobs and potentially the whole organization (Purcell 2007, 6;
Torrington et al. 2011, 252).
For the case company, it is essential to provide the cafeteria employees with a
quality induction in order to provide them with necessary information. In addition
a rewarding system should be established especially in the cafeteria in order to
improve the employee motivation in challenging work environment. Also
providing the employees with the independence to develop their own jobs would
increase performance.
Kjelin and Kuusisto (2003) suggest that a company can strengthen its
competitive advantage by offering a profound induction program to its
employees. Today customers face an enormous supply of different services and
products on the market, especially within the gym and sports business the
competition is tough. As the supply for such services is vast, the demand for
quality customer service has increased. Maintaining competitive advantage only
by offering low prices is challenging. The importance of customer satisfaction
cannot be stressed enough as customers can easily switch to another service
provider. (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2003, 20 – 22)
“Assessing the training needs of new employees consumes time and money, but
it sends the message that the organization is committed to the development of its
employees, to giving them the right tools to perform, and to putting them in a
position where they can succeed“ (Acevedo and Yancey 2011, 350)
In the case company induction is currently carried out alongside the routine
work. This is one of the main issues regarding induction; to complete the daily
routines a rather small amount of information is enough. In an ideal situation
there is enough information provided in order to not only complete the routines,
but to understand the operational environment and thus be able to solve
possible unexpected issues. (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010, 202; Acevedo and
Yancey 2011, 349) When an employee has enough information, one is able to
work actively towards the common goals and take on initiatives that direct the
organization towards its vision (see picture 3) (Lehtonen, 2013). This broader
and more systematic process called onboarding is a phased approach in which
the focus is more on the success factors and company culture than on
traditional human resource policies (Derven, 2008, 49 – 50). In the case
company this is essential as it is very important that the employees are kept up
to date regarding the company’s vision and goals. If even the basic issues have
to be learned independently, it is difficult to understand the whole operational
environment of the company.
In order to execute a proper orientation for the new employees the induction
should be well planned and the responsibility areas should be clearly defined.
Ideally there is a mutual feeling of a shared responsibility in the organization
and the whole working community participates in the induction process. Also the
stages of the orientation should be planned; which issues are taught first and
which can be postponed? The methods of the training should be chosen based
on the individual since people are different as learners. Some people prefer
reading materials while others learn best by doing. How do you follow the
progress of the induction? By writing a learning diary or by having feedback
sessions? (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010, 199 – 201) Importantly, the proposed
outcomes of the orientation should be also assessed. In order to evaluate the
new employee’s performance, the desired goals of the induction process should
be communicated. (Monster 2013)
The nature of the work in the case company poses a challenge for the induction
process; the employees work in shifts and several activities occur
simultaneously and thus it is difficult to train the employees step-by-step. Shift
work also creates a challenge in assessing the roles and responsibility of the
orientation. Based on the observations there should be a person who is clearly
in charge of the induction process, but in practice the whole cafeteria team
should be involved in it. Without a clear assignment of roles problems are more
likely to arise as presumed by Koskinen & Peiponen (2010, 38).
Several issues that affect the success, content and length of the induction
process depend on the new employee. Previous job experiences and the
expectations towards the induction modify the induction process. The
organization must ensure that the induction is customized for each new
employee. (Great Place to Work, 2012) Generally younger employees require
more guidance compared to an older employee who already has more job
experience. This problem also occurs at the case company; sometimes relevant
information is not shared, as the people responsible for the induction are more
experienced employees who might take some matters for granted. The
organization must identify those employee characteristics the firm will require to
execute its strategy. (Dessler, 2013, 272) The induction process should include
an orientation discussion regarding the contents of the induction, the past
experiences of the employee and defining the strengths and weaknesses of the
employee(Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010, 163). It is essential to identify the
employee’s current skills and compare those to the skills that the job requires.
Thus the training needs of each individual can be assessed so that the required
need of skills for working are met. (Shivarudrappa, D.; Ramachandra, K.;
Gopalakrishna, K.S. 2010, 66)
The evaluation of the training period is essential. There are several ways to
evaluate training. Employees can be asked to evaluate the training or they can
be tested after the training is completed. The training can be also evaluated
from the customer’s point of view; for example if the amount of reclaims has
reduced. The follow-up of the induction after a few months cannot be stressed
enough. The manager and the new employee should discuss if the induction
succeeded and whether some areas still require more training. It is not only
important for the new employee’s training, but also for the development of the
organization. Feedback regarding possible improvements on the induction
process should be asked for. This way it is a continuous learning process for
both parties. (Dessler, 2013, 298)
In the end of the orientation period, one should be able to understand the
operational environment of the company and its values and the mutual goals. It
is important that the newcomer understands how the processes and relationship
between customers, employees and the company owners work (Picture 3). One
of the cornerstones of the whole induction process is to communicate the
company values and vision to the employee and interpret those into practice.
The values should be present during the whole induction process. As the
competitive advantage today is difficult to obtain, values become important as
they affect people’s attitudes. A company does not have existing values and
vision unless the employees know them. (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010, Davidson
2002, 22, 126)
Picture 3. Induction emphasizes the general view (Kjelin and Kuusisto 2010,
203)
3 RESEARCH METHODS
Due to the fact that the author has been working for the company already for
three and half years, collecting data through participant observation was a
natural choice. In order to receive more in-depth data and to increase the
credibility and objectivity of the data, semi-structured interviews were also used.
There are several roles that the researcher can take in the participant
observation. In the case of this research, the author has taken the role of a
participant observer. In this type of role, the purpose as a researcher is revealed
to the organization. The objectives of the research were explained to other
employees of the case company since the beginning of the study. Another
aspect is also to gain trust in order to be able to adapt to the group and
situations. The role of the participant observer is very time-consuming, however
in the case of this thesis it was not a challenge as the author had been working
for the company already for some years and had been able to make
observations alongside working. Another reason for the author to choose the
role of a participant observer is because it often tends to create openness and
trust within the organization. (Saunders et al. 2007. 288 - 289)
In this thesis, semi-structured interviews were used in order to gather data for
the research. In addition to participant observation, the researcher decided to
gather data in order to justify the observations and to find out if there were some
additional research topics that the researcher had not identified.
There are several reasons that have an effect on the decision to use a semi-
structured interview (Saunders et al. 2007. 315). Perhaps the most significant
factor in this thesis is that the nature of this research is exploratory. This means,
that the meaning of the research is to “clarify your understanding of a problem,
such as if you are unsure of the precise nature of the problem” as Saunders et
al. (2007, 133) mention. This fact adds value for the research, as the intention is
to confirm what the researcher has observed. Semi-structured interview also
adds value to the research, as the words and phrases the interviewee uses may
bring whole new meaning for the answers. There is also the possibility to
redefine some of the research objectives, as in a semi-structured interview the
discussions may lead in to some areas that one might have not though before.
(Saunders et al. 2007. 315) The abovementioned aspects definitely add value
to the research of this thesis.
However, the major risk regarding the reliability and validity of participant
observation is observer bias. This means that as one is observing phenomena
in a social world, that one is also part of, it is impossible to separate oneself
from it. In this case, it is also infeasible not to trust one’s common sense and
experiences when trying to interpret those situations that we undergo. In other
words, an observer bias cannot be avoided; however one must be aware of it
and try to work on it. For example, one can contest the conclusions made by
presenting questions such as: “Did he really mean that? Is there any other way
this could be interpreted?”. (Saunders et al. 2007. 292) Regarding this research,
the risk for an observer bias is actual, due to the personal ties the researcher
has within the organization’s shareholders. It will be further discussed in this
chapter.
This is also the situation in this study. Each organization is a sum of its
members –the people. Each person is a separate unit with their own feelings,
thoughts and ideas, which have a big impact on the topic. As the organization in
question is still young and likely to develop, the needs for an induction folder
and which kind of, are likely to change. Thus the reliability of this study is
debatable. (Saunders et al. 2007. 318)
There are some pre-actions that should be executed in order to ensure the
highest possible credibility for the research; the researcher should gain enough
knowledge on the organizational context of the case company. The employees
of the company should be also informed on the research. Appropriateness of
the location and point of time should be considered as well as the layout and
form of questioning. (Saunders et al. 2007. 320 – 321)
The employees of the case company were informed by the CEO early before
the start of the study that a research would be made and interviews would take
place. About a week before the interviews would take place, the CEO of the
The researcher has gained a lot of information about the current situation of the
organization, as she has been working in the company since it was founded in
2009. The researcher has also been working in different departments of the
company, such as sales and invoicing in addition to the cafeteria which this
study concerns. This creates added value for the study, as the researcher is
able to see the organization from multiple viewpoints and how the lack of proper
induction has an effect on the whole organization.
The location and timing of the interviews have an impact on the information
provided by the participants. The place where the interviews take place should
be one where the participants feel relaxed. It should be quiet in order to avoid
the recording from being damaged and where no interruptions might occur.
(Saunders et al. 2007. 321) The interviews of this research took place in a
negotiation room in the case company’s premises. This location was chosen in
order to make it convenient for the employees to participate in the interview
before their work started. Even if it would have been more relaxed to implement
the interviews outside the case company, this location was chosen in order to
ensure the highest possible participation rate for the research. The interviews
took place outside the employees’ working hours during weeks 47, 48 and 49.
This is a high season time for the organization, which increases the credibility of
the information provided by the participants as they face the development
needs more often than in low season times.
The questions formulated for this interview were stated clearly and presented
with a neutral tone of voice. Many open questions were used in order to avoid
The interviewer can have a huge impact on the outcomes of the interview. One
should avoid commenting and generating non-verbal behavior. One’s position,
wording or tone of voice should not lead the interviewee to answering in a
certain way. However one should note that showing boredom creates also a
negative impact; by using a neutral and interested voice and generating
vigorous and open posture would ensure least possible interviewer impact on
the results of the interview. The interviewer should also listen to the interviewee
carefully and not only listen to the words, but also follow the non-verbal
communication. Enough time should be given for the interviewee to generate
the answers. (Saunders et al. 2007. 325 – 326)
The next chapter will discuss the importance of induction for the case company
as well as the structure of a possible induction process for the case company.
4 DATA ANALYSIS
The researcher finds that the interviews were very successful and valuable
material was received. The fact that the interviews were recorded created some
uncertainty and reluctance in answering the questions; the interviewees were
more comfortable with discussing the most sensitive issues when the recorder
was turned off. Also the researcher felt that at times it was difficult for the
interviewees to talk as the interviewer did not reply to their answers nor told her
opinions.
For this research, the researcher interviewed ten people from all the levels
(employees, managers, shareholders) of the organization in order to get as
versatile results as possible. (Interview questions in appendix 2). All
interviewees were not asked all the questions; based on the position in the
organization, some of the questions were left out. Although this research was
done in order to develop the induction process of the case company, the
interviews revealed some valuable information on other development needs as
well. These topics will be further discussed in 4.2.
3,5
2,5
2
Male
1,5 Female
0,5
0
20-30 31-40 41-50
The researcher finds that the research participants were all very unanimous on
the importance of induction. The respondents agreed that the induction is at the
moment defective and unorganized: nobody is clearly in charge of it and it is not
As seen from table 2, all of the respondents agreed that induction has a
significant effect on the employee motivation and customer satisfaction. One of
the interviewees mentions:
“Of course it is more motivating to work if one does not have to learn everything
through mistakes”
(Interviewee 3, 1.11.2012)
The results support Kjelin’s and Kuusisto’s (2003, 20 – 22) claims on induction’s
effect on employee satisfaction; at the early stages of employment, new
workers normally have a high motivation towards their work and poor induction
can damage it.
(Interviewee 8, 12.11.2012)
Again, the results support Foot and Hook’s arguments (1992, 202; 2008, 293) of
induction being an important part of internal operations affecting the public
image as well as creating a feeling that the employee is expected and
welcomed to the company.
KT Kuntatyönantajat 2011 explains that poor induction lowers work results and
harms customer satisfaction. The research results also support this statement.
Many of the interviewees revealed that one often faces situations where the
customer does not get the right answer or gets no answer at all. One of the
permanent employees interviewed points out:
”I must admit it is too often when we face such situations when one has to tell the
customer that I don’t know. It is impossible to remember everything, as that
information is written down nowhere”
(Interviewee 4, 2.11.2012)
Also, the observations made through working in the case company show that
poor induction lowers customer satisfaction. One has often faced customer
feedback on poor internal communication or lack of employee expertise.
Kjelin and Kuusisto (2003, 20 – 22) also mention that poor induction weakens
employees’ commitment and thus increases the risk of high employee turn-over.
The research does not support this argument clearly and thus it is an interesting
topic for future research. In the case company, the annual employee turnover is
currently approximately 15 employees. Most of it is natural turnover as the case
company has many students working part-time. However, in the researcher’s
opinion adapting a profound induction process would decrease also the
employee turnover.
12
10
6 Yes
No
4
0
Induction & Motivation Induction & Customer satisfaction
The research results support the arguments given by Purcell and Boxall (2003)
about performance consisting of three elements: ability, motivation and
Half of the respondents mentioned that there is a need for regular development
discussions in order to improve the operations further and to be able to bring
out their own ideas. However most of the interviewees added that it is easy to
give feedback but it seems like it is not being acknowledged. This creates
frustration and negatively affects motivation.
The cafeteria employees also thought that they should have some kind of
reward system for their job as the work is very challenging and hectic at most
times. One of the permanent employees state:
(Interviewee 3, 1.11.2012)
the case company would express their interest more throughout daily, unofficial
communication, it would be enough. The employees said it would improve
motivation. Such arguments also support Bratton’s and Gold’s (2003, 288 –
289) claims on monetary rewards versus nonmonetary rewards; they
recommend that the way employees are being treated can increase
performance more than the amount of money they get. These findings are
essential regarding the case company’s financial situation as well; increasing
the internal communication would thus result in higher employee performance,
however not being a straight cost for the company.
As Kjelin and Kuusisto (2010, 203) illustrate in picture 2, the induction process
should emphasize the overall picture of a company. In the case company, it is
very crucial to understand the whole operational context. The work of every unit
at the case company affects one another and they cannot work independently
from each other.
As picture 2 illustrates, the induction process should aim at the mutual goals of
an organization, which are achieved through mutual values. In the case
company, the main goal was clear to everyone; to increase the number of the
gym customers, which is the main task of the sales team. This brings out a
question: what are the targets and goals of the work in the cafeteria / reception?
When asking whether there should be a goal set for the cafeteria / reception
work, the majority of the respondents were somewhat uncertain whether there
should be a goal for their job. Based on the observations occasionally it is
difficult to work at the cafeteria as there are no principles that guide the work.
For example, during rush hours it can be difficult to prioritize the work: whether
the gym customers or the cafeteria customers should be served first.
understand what the question was about, some of the interviewees even said
they had not thought about the values at all. After all, the opinions of the
employees and the management differed significantly. Most of the employees
simply felt that a shared value in the company is to work hard, whereas the
upper management contradicted that the company would be a preferable and
desirable place to work. Clearly, the management has failed to communicate
the values for the employees. Kjelin and Kuusisto (2010, 202) suggest that
values should pass through the whole induction process. The research presents
that this recommendation is not executed in the case company. Values are
essential guidelines for every employee and thus it is essential that they are
established. Moreover it is important that the values are shared in the
organization and that they are interpreted in practice.
would discuss the possible contents of the induction process according to the
new employee’s needs. This would minimize the risk of important information
being left out from the induction, which at the moment is being observed in the
case company.
Kjelin and Kuusisto (2010, 199 – 201) also discuss the importance of clear roles
within the induction process. The research shows that in the case company,
roles are one of the main issues in the implementation of the induction. As
pointed out earlier, at the moment, there is no one in charge of the induction
process at the case company. The cafeteria manager is responsible; however
this is not implemented in the case company. For example, when the latest new
employee started, the cafeteria manager was on vacation and a day before the
new employee started, the other employees started planning what should be
done tomorrow. This study supports the views of Kjelin and Kuusisto (2010,
199-201) that the roles should be clear in the induction. It is especially important
in the case company, because the work is done in shifts. The induction should
be more closely planned, as the new employee might work with three different
people on the first days. Another suggestion is that the new employee would
start working in the same shifts with a named tutor, the cafeteria manager for
example. It is important that the new employee gets enough support on the first
days. The research revealed that at the moment in the case company the new
employees do not get enough support; for example one of the employees was
left alone in the night shift on the second day. During the interviews, it came up,
for example, that when a new employee visits the case company the first time,
there are actually two people in the management who introduce the company
and explain about general practices at the company. However, these managers
do not discuss with one another to plan how to divide the induction process.
Thus, the new employee might receive the same information repeatedly.
In general, the interviewees thought that the roles and responsibilities should
not be too strictly defined in the cafeteria, as it is important that each employee
knows all the tasks. However, for busy days, many employees agreed that the
roles should be defined. The cafeteria is physically a very small place and as
many employees are working at the same time, hassle is created as everyone
is trying to do everything.
Currently the induction of the cafeteria has many shortages and is being
organized through the motto “learn by doing”. The company has now grown
into a point where it is no longer possible for the employees to learn their work
only by doing. In order to develop an induction program, the major challenges of
the case company’s cafeteria must be identified. In addition to the major
challenges identified earlier, the interviewees made the following observations.
The company is open seven days a week from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. (except on
Saturdays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.). The cafeteria / reception is run in several
shifts and the cafeteria manager cannot work all the time. This means that
unless the manager is on the current shift, there is no one in charge of the
cafeteria. Nevertheless there should be a person defined who is in charge
during each shift.
The fact that significant amount of part-time employees is used increases the
amount of errors as these employees often have had the weakest induction.
This also takes a lot of time from the permanent personnel’s resources as they
must constantly give advice for the part-time workers.
(Interviewee 3, 1.11.2012)
As already mentioned in the beginning, the cafeteria works as a reception for all
the services the company offers, which means that employees must be well
aware of all of them. The research points out extent of the work and large
amount of information being the major challenge: How to induct the new
employee with enough information on all the services, but not to make it too
overwhelming with unnecessary information.
1) General induction: On the first day the CEO would welcome the
new employee and give a company overview presenting
company background and all the services offered. The new
employee would be introduced to other employees and their
To support the induction program, the case company requested for an induction
folder to be developed. One of the objectives of the study was also to research
the scope of such induction materials. The study revealed a need for two
separate folders; one introducing the company and discussing the operational
environment as well as its values and vision. Another work for the cafeteria
would explain the practical tasks that are ought to be done on each shift.
During the research, it was also noticed that the IT-skills of the employees vary
greatly and due to lack of proper IT-skills, some people even avoid using e-mail.
People should be encouraged to use all the available communication tools and
require the employees to read their email at least once a week.
When providing new employees with a proper induction one must acknowledge
that the current employees in the organization have not received such an
orientation. Assuming that the proposed induction program will take place in the
case company, the study suggests that the new induction program being tested
with the current employees. Thus the current employees are trained to achieve
the necessary skills and abilities. Simultaneously the effectivity of the new
induction program is being tested.
“In theory I know who my supervisor is but in practice there are two leaders
telling me different things. They really should sit down and really think through
their responsibility areas” (Interviewee 6, 7.11.2012)
5 CONCLUSIONS
Induction has a straight effect on the quality of customer service and only
trained employees who are up to date on relevant information can deliver
quality customer service. Induction also indicates how the company takes care
of its employees and yet, induction is the first process that the new employee
faces. Thus a company can create a memorable first impression – in good or in
bad. Well executed induction significantly accelerates employees’ learning as
there is a clear program to be followed and the employee knows what is ahead.
It also has an effect on employee turnover; as people are effectively oriented,
they are more likely to stay in the firm for a longer time.
Currently the induction within the case company is run along with daily routines.
The opening times and shift work as well as weak internal communication
create major challenges at the cafeteria. As it is often very hectic, important
information might be forgotten to pass over. On top of this the research
revealed that the organizational values in the case company are not mutual; the
opinions between the employees and management differ greatly regarding this
matter. Emphasizing organizational values is one of the key elements for a
successful induction.
The suggested induction program created through this research should be first
tested with the current employees in order to point out possible weaknesses of
the program but also to train the current staff for the desired level.
The case company has great opportunities for high growth but in order to
deliver high quality customer service and achieve the strategic growth
objectives, an induction process must be developed. For the implementation of
the proposed induction process and other suggestions mentioned in this work,
the researcher also proposes the organization to hire a human resource
manager or alternatively educate the current managers in human resource
management. Additionally, the researcher suggests that the case company
would create a separate reception for the gym customers. This would make the
reception services more customer friendly but also cut down the work load of
the cafeteria employees.
SOURCE MATERIAL
Armstrong, M. 2010. Creating Success: How to Manage People. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
Consulted 15.8.2012
th
Armstrong, M. 1999. A Hanfbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 7 Edition.
London: Kogan Page Limited.
rd
Bratton J.; Gold J. 2003. Human Resource Management. 3 Edition. Basingstoke: PALGRAVE
MACMILLAN.
Camillus, O. 1986. Strategic Management and Planning Control: Systems for Survival and
Success. Lanham: Lexington Books. Consulted: 20.3.2013.
http://books.google.fi/books?id=k6fv8KBer1sC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=greiner+stages+of+gr
owth&source=bl&ots=ID7bpvJMIu&sig=IHGM2wCY4dtbHZIqSTJ0ZiHFE7I&hl=fi&sa=X&ei=v-
JJUaLwNImXtAbP0ID4DQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=greiner%20stages%20of%20growth&f=
false
Derven, M. 2008. Management Onboarding. T+D Vol. 62 Issue 4, 48 – 52. Consulted 14.9.2012
th
Dessler, G. 2013. Human Resource Management. 13 Edition. Essex: Pearson Education
Limited.
th
Foot, M.; Hook C. 2008. Introducing Human Resource Management. 5 Edition. Essex:
Pearson Education Limited.
nd
Foot, M.; Hook, C. 1999. Introducing Human Resource Management. 2 Edition. Essex:
Pearson Education Limited.
Friend, G.; Zehle, S. 2004. Guide to Business Planning. London: Profile Books. Consulted
2.4.2013. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/turkuamk/Doc?id=10210696&ppg=91
Great Place to Work 2012. Olet tervetullut ja odotettu – perehdytys Suomen parhaissa
työpaikoissa. Consulted 20.3.2013. http://www.greatplacetowork.fi/julkaisut-ja-
tapahtumat/blogit-ja-uutiset/621
th
Jones, G. 2010. Organisational Theory, Design and Change. 6 Edition. New Jersey: Pearson
Education Limited.
Purcell, J. 2007. Understanding the people and performance link: unlocking the black box.
London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Turun Sanomat 2008. Hyvin perehdytetty tulokas tietää missä on töissä. Consulted 20.3.2013.
http://www.ts.fi/erikoissivut/talousliite/1074277228/Hyvin+perehdytetty+tulokas+tietaa+missa+o
n+toissa
Interview questions