Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 51 views

    STS Reflective Narrative Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    didi chen
    This document provides a rating scale for assessing a reflective narrative assignment on living through the COVID-19 quarantine. Students are asked to write about their experiences and compile lessons learned based on concepts from science, technology, and society (STS) and the papal encyclical Laudato Si'. The rating scale includes four criteria: practice and application, depth of reflection, required components, and organization. Points are awarded based on how well the narrative demonstrates synthesis of ideas, viewpoints, examples, inclusion of all required parts, and clarity and organization of writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    STS Reflective Narrative Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    didi chen
    51 views2 pages
    This document provides a rating scale for assessing a reflective narrative assignment on living through the COVID-19 quarantine. Students are asked to write about their experiences and compile lessons learned based on concepts from science, technology, and society (STS) and the papal encyclical Laudato Si'. The rating scale includes four criteria: practice and application, depth of reflection, required components, and organization. Points are awarded based on how well the narrative demonstrates synthesis of ideas, viewpoints, examples, inclusion of all required parts, and clarity and organization of writing.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rating scale for assessing a reflective narrative assignment on living through the COVID-19 quarantine. Students are asked to write about their experiences and compile lessons learned based on concepts from science, technology, and society (STS) and the papal encyclical Laudato Si'. The rating scale includes four criteria: practice and application, depth of reflection, required components, and organization. Points are awarded based on how well the narrative demonstrates synthesis of ideas, viewpoints, examples, inclusion of all required parts, and clarity and organization of writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    51 views2 pages

    STS Reflective Narrative Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    didi chen
    This document provides a rating scale for assessing a reflective narrative assignment on living through the COVID-19 quarantine. Students are asked to write about their experiences and compile lessons learned based on concepts from science, technology, and society (STS) and the papal encyclical Laudato Si'. The rating scale includes four criteria: practice and application, depth of reflection, required components, and organization. Points are awarded based on how well the narrative demonstrates synthesis of ideas, viewpoints, examples, inclusion of all required parts, and clarity and organization of writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Subject: STS

    Topic: _________________________________ Group No. _____ Year and Section: _____

    DIRECTION: Write your score under the criteria.

    Rating Scale for Assessing a Reflective Narrative: My Life amidst the COVID-19 ECQ: In the Contexts of STS and Laudato Si’
    Performance Task: Students will compile a reflective narrative on the assigned topic/ activity.
    Goals / Standard: Compose an exceptional reflective narrative using the following criteria.

    Criteria Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Needs Improvement


    Practice and More than sufficient evidence of Sufficient evidence of synthesis of Little evidence of synthesis of ideas No evidence of synthesis of ideas
    Application synthesis of ideas, with insights ideas, with insights gained. and insights gained. Few and insights gained. No implications
    (50%) gained. Implications of these Implications of these insights are implications of insights. of insights.
    Score: insights are thoroughly discussed. discussed. (30) (20)
    __________ (50) (40)
    Depth of Viewpoints and interpretations are Viewpoints and interpretations are Viewpoints and interpretations are Viewpoints and interpretations are
    Reflection insightful and well supported. supported. Appropriate examples unsupported or with flawed missing, inappropriate, and/or
    (20%) Clear, detailed examples are are provided. arguments. Examples are not unsupported. Examples are not
    provided. (15) provided or are irrelevant. provided.
    Score:
    (20) (10) (5)
    __________
    All components are included and All components are included and Some components do not fully Essential components are missing
    exceeds all requirements. All meets all requirements. All meet the requirements. Some and/or does not address the
    Required necessary items are completely necessary items are addressed. questions, parts of the assignment, requirements. Many parts of the
    Components addressed. All required attachments and/or attachments and additional assignment and additional
    (15%) All required attachments and/or additional documents (e.g., pictures documents (e.g., pictures as documents (e.g., pictures as
    Score: additional documents (e.g., pictures as evidence) are included. evidence) are missing or unsuitable evidence) are addressed minimally,
    __________ as evidence) are included. (10) for the purpose of the assignment. inadequately, and/or not at all.
    (15) (7) (5)

    Organization Writing is clear, concise, & well Writing is clear, concise & Writing is somewhat clear & Writing is unclear & disorganized.
    (15%) organized with excellent organized with very satisfactory concise, with satisfactory Thoughts are not coherent and
    Score: sentence/paragraph construction sentence/paragraph construction in sentence/paragraph construction in needs improvement.
    __________ throughout the paper. most parts of the paper. some parts of the paper. (5)
    (15) (10) (7)
    Components of the Reflective Narrative:
    1) Introduction: must include the setting, the characters, and prepare the audience for the action to come, i.e., the What and the Why.
    2) Body of the reflective narrative: (a) experiences and observations, and explanations based on STS and Laudato Si’ concepts; (b) values and skills learned (e.g., discriminating between factual
    vs fake news); (c) knowledge gained (e.g., the science behind COVID-19, RT-PCR, Rapid Tests); (d) impact on self, family & society.
    3) Conclusion: Realizations, plans and actions to be taken based on knowledge, values and skills gained from the experiences in order to take responsibility for the present and future world.
    4) Pictures and Supporting Documents: to support or better describe your claim.

    Signature of rater: _______________________ Overall score: _____ Date signed: _____________

    You might also like