Pharmaceutical Sciences: To Determine The Incidence of Dyslipidemia in Young Adults
Pharmaceutical Sciences: To Determine The Incidence of Dyslipidemia in Young Adults
Pharmaceutical Sciences: To Determine The Incidence of Dyslipidemia in Young Adults
Please cite this article in press Batool Riasat Ali et al., , To Determine The Incidence Of Dyslipidemia In
Young Adults,Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2020; 07(09).
www.iajps.com Page 45
IAJPS 2020, 07 (09), 45-49 Batool Riasat Ali et al ISSN 2349-7750
www.iajps.com Page 46
IAJPS 2020, 07 (09), 45-49 Batool Riasat Ali et al ISSN 2349-7750
it was less than 100 mg/dL. Triglycerides level gathered participants of age less than 40 years
>150 mg/dL was identified as and greater than 20 years with a mean age of
hypertriglyceridemia.10 We defined isolated 32.5 + 5.2 years. In this study, we found that
dyslipidemias as abnormal levels of any 75.9% of young adults had dyslipidemia. We first
one of these factors. However, mixed distributed the population according to categories
dyslipidemia was the term given to abnormalities in of lipid levels made by the NCEP. Adult
more than one of these. Although borderline Treatment Panel III10, which placed 56% of the
levels are alarming, we did not consider those in participants in the serum cholesterol range of
the classification of hyperlipidemias. The statistical <200 mg/dL (desirable/low) and 21.4% in that
analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0. of >239 mg/dL (high). When triglyceride levels
Mean and standard deviations were recorded for were analyzed, 42.9% had it equal or above the
age and the lipid profile parameters. The data critical level. 58% of participants assigned to the
were further categorized according to age study had HDL levels <40 mg/dL while four of
group. Post-stratification, Chi-square and student them had it above 60 mg/dL. On the other hand,
t-test was applied. P-value <0.05 was on grouping LDL levels we had 31.3% of
considered significant. population with LDL levels <100 mg/dL, 50.0% in
a range of 100-159 mg/dL, and 18.8% above
RESULTS: >159mg/dL
In this short study population of 112, we had 62
males (55.4%) and 50 females (44.6%). We only
Table-I shows the descriptive statistics of lipid profile in total and the distribution according to male
and female gender. The mean total cholesterol overall was 209.17 + 99.96 with significant differences
in males and females (p = 0.018) while the differences in triglyceride levels, HDL and LDL between males
and females were non-significant. In Table-I, the prevalence of dyslipidemia and the different types of
hyperlipidemias is also shown with 75.9% overall, and a significantly high percentage of
dyslipidemia in females (p < 0.05). 7.1% of the total had isolated hypertriglyceridemia, 18.8% had
isolated low HDL levels, and 46.4% had mixed hyperlipidemia, with significant differences between males
and females in the former two.
www.iajps.com Page 47
IAJPS 2020, 07 (09), 45-49 Batool Riasat Ali et al ISSN 2349-7750
www.iajps.com Page 48
IAJPS 2020, 07 (09), 45-49 Batool Riasat Ali et al ISSN 2349-7750
www.iajps.com Page 49