Spotify Resource Based View
Spotify Resource Based View
Spotify Resource Based View
gentlemen who just wanted to listen to music, legally. Viewing Spotify through the Resource-
Based View, I will analyze the resources and capabilities in the company’s digital content
distribution value chain that are used to attain and sustain competitive advantage. Spotify’s
competitive position in the music streaming market is supported by resources and capabilities
similar to the core competencies of major competitors, such as Apple Music, Google Play Music,
Pandora, and Amazon Music. Apple Music closely competes with Spotify who has clearly been
in the industry for a longer time than its competitors.
Spotify music catalog which is now ranging on ~50 million is closely tailed by its competitors,
Apple, Amazon, and Google. The value creation is moderate since creating a catalog of this huge
volume requires money and time thus giving Spotify a temporary competitive advantage.
Spotify’s relationship with its labels can be counted as one of the core-competency of Spotify. It
splits 52 percent of the revenue with the labels (Universal Music Group, Sony Music
Entertainment, and Warner Music Group) and now it has proceeded to collaborate directly with
the artists. This establishing of partnerships with right holders creates high value for Spotify
which is difficult to imitate. One of the most highly regarded features of Spotify is the curation
system. Spotify’s playlists – “Discover Weekly” which automatically generates a personally
tailored playlist of two to three hours of music for its users every week. Spotify has found a new
way to tap the collective intelligence of its 240 million users, turning their taste into a data layer
that can be used to better personalize everyone’s experience (Davis, 2019). Over 8,000 artists for
whom 50% of listeners are from Discover Weekly and 42% of listeners use Discover Weekly
first thing in the morning (Popper, 2015). Apple music which still believes in human curation
and has been reviewed to fail at giving a good classical music experience is lagging behind and
so are the other competitors (Hi-Fi?, 2020). The curation system of Spotify is high value and
rarity since the music taste curated as a result of the activity of around 300 million customers is
leveraged strategically well to create playlists of lesser-known tracks giving the exquisite feel to
music lovers thus building customer loyalty in effect. It is difficult to imitate and transfer and
substitute simply because of the high volume of user data.
The user data is composed of 240 million subscribers out of which 100 million pay for the
services. Its “freemium” service is robust and provides access to the same playlists just without
the ability to shuffle. This gives Spotify access to user data and keeps the users on the application
since its competitors do not provide similarly high-quality services for free yet. This is an
example of an IT asset barrier that would be difficult to be copied and provides Spotify at least a
temporary competitive advantage according to Piccoli’s and Ive’s framework. Spotify’s core
competencies that help sustain competitive advantage are its brand popularity that provides a
sustainable or long-term competitive advantage for attracting more online platform users. Its
partnership with device manufacturers like Samsung that make Spotify the default music playing
application or with social media giants like Facebook which allows you to see what your friends
are listening to. Recently Spotify collaborated with Uber so that you could access your playlist
whenever you take an Uber. Spotify’s partnership with Brandpage helps musicians sell directly
to fans. Another huge partnership with Ticketmaster is used for concert recommendations. These
can be classified as complementary resources barrier according to Piccoli’s and Ives framework.