Competitive Advantage: What's Luck Got To Do With It?
Competitive Advantage: What's Luck Got To Do With It?
Competitive Advantage: What's Luck Got To Do With It?
Hao Ma
Department of Management, Bryant College, Smithfield, Rhode Island, USA
Keywords It is no secret that scholars and practitioners better create customer value than others may
Competitive advantage, in strategic management tend to believe that be a potential cause of competitive advantage
Enviromental impact
general managers do matter when it comes to (Ma, 1999). Luck, by definition, discriminates
Abstract creating competitive advantage and against some players. It creates
Luck remains an elusive sustaining superior firm performance heterogeneity among firms along
theoretical concept in the (Andrews, 1971). Such a view has long been a strategically meaningful dimensions, e.g.
business literature yet a
dominant and cherished assumption in this access to a critical supply of certain unique
fascinating practical phenomenon
in business reality. In addition to field where we believe that general resources, and causes differentials in firms'
effective strategic maneuvering managers' choices and actions, to a great resource profiles and their abilities to exploit
and well-run internal management, extent, determine firm performance and the opportunities in the product markets
luck often plays a non-trivial role results (Child, 1972; Rumelt et al., 1991). There
as a determinant of competitive
(Barney, 1986, 1991). As such, it would be
also exist, however, from time to time, voices theoretically fruitful and practically relevant
advantage and firm performance.
Understanding the various types of that help direct our attention to the aspect of to examine the various ways in which luck
luck and the contextual conditions the stochastic nature of firm performance creates differential treatment among
under which luck strikes is (Mancke, 1974; Jacobson, 1988) and the
therefore expected to help a firm
competing firms and therefore confers
seemingly inexplicable term known simply competitive advantage to some while denying
gain competitive advantage. This
paper advances a typology of as luck (Barney, 1986), a sort of serendipitous others.
different scenarios of luck ± pure happenings, often unfathomable even to its
luck, prepared luck, useful weeds, beneficiaries, and unpredictable a priori.
and skunk work ± and expounds Elusive as a theoretical concept yet certain
the strategic implications of these Luck as a determinant of
in its earthly presence, luck, admit it or not,
scenarios for the firm's search for competitive advantage: a typology
as a non-trivial determinant of performance,
competitive advantage. Taking a of scenarios
proactive approach, it untangles begs our further understanding and should
the typical environmental sources perhaps neither be conveniently reduced to Using the firm as the unit of analysis, luck
of luck as well as the intra-firm can be endogenous, rising primarily within
the ``error term'' in statistical analysis nor
mechanisms and processes
casually dismissed as being atheoretical. To the firm as a system, or exogenous, effecting
through which a firm could better
induce, recognize, and exploit date, there is rarely any formal effort that primarily from outside the firm's boundary.
lucky incidents of innovations from systematically explains how luck impacts on Luck is also a two-way street. While some
useful weeds or skunk works. the gaining of competitive advantage and firms wait for the lucky break passively,
firm performance. What do we mean by luck? others seek it proactively. A firm with a
How many different types of luck are there? proactive posture toward its management
Could a firm enhance its likelihood of getting and strategic maneuvers is likely to be:
lucky? Motivated by these questions, this . more aware of the contextual situations
article attempts to dissect the luck under which one could get lucky; and
phenomenon in the context of business . better at recognizing and exploiting it
competition and provide an integrative when luck strikes.
framework expounding luck as a
Such preparedness and proactiveness on the
determinant of competitive advantage.
firm's part will, we expect, influence a firm's
Competitive advantage grows out of the
firm's unique ability in creating superior chance of getting lucky and the ways that
customer value (Porter, 1985). Therefore, any luck could contribute to the firm's gaining
factor, action, or event that could enlarge the and sustaining competitive advantage. Some
differential between rival firms on a firms, on the other hand, simply wait for luck
Management Decision particular dimension that allows a firm to to emerge in totally serendipitous fashion.
40/6 [2002] 525±536 Based on the two dimensions discussed
# MCB UP Limited above, the various scenarios where luck
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
[ISSN 0025-1747] confers competitive advantage can be
[DOI 10.1108/00251740210433927] http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0025-1747.htm
classified into the following general
[ 525 ]
Hao Ma categories: pure luck; prepared luck; useful One person's loss is another's gain
Competitive advantage: weed, and skunk work. See Figure 1 for a In an ongoing competition, chancy events
what's luck got to do with it?
graphic presentation of these scenarios. could also spell luck for certain firms in the
Management Decision To practicing general managers, however, it form of windfall gains. For instance, the
40/6 [2002] 525±536
is perhaps more meaningful to focus on how recent 11 September terrorist attack against
they could, through their own efforts, the USA had spawned a huge demand for US
improve their odds of getting struck by luck national flags for patriotic reasons. As such,
than merely knowing the fact that in most one of the side effects of this terrible tragedy
cases luck is totally serendipitous and turned out to be that some Taiwanese flag
beyond their control. As such, I shall first makers were flooded with tons of orders for
briefly explain in the following paragraphs US flags that required around the clock shifts
each of the above four scenarios with case in making them, awarding them much
examples, and then elaborate respectively in needed business in a time of a domestic
the next two segments on what general economic slump. By the same token, this
managers should do to court luck, from tragedy also spelled lucky opportunities for
either the external environment or within many New York City street vendors who
the firm. That is, this article takes an could now sell basically the same $2 T-shirts
unequivocally proactive approach toward (in quality and style) for $5 apiece, which
now feature the American flag or some
luck as a determinant of competitive
patriotic slogans such as ``United We Stand''
advantage.
instead of those usual ``I Love New York''
ones.
Pure luck
Obviously, the strategic implication of
Pure luck defies human intention and action.
such pure luck is perhaps for the firm's
Pure luck in gaining advantage refers to the
general managers to be keenly aware of the
situation where factors exogenous to the firm
presence of luck and appropriately exploit it.
give rise to competitive advantage
The real challenge here, however, is perhaps
spontaneously, not subjecting to the firm's
not to become over confident or complacent
purposeful control and/or intentional
in the face of luck, in addition to recognizing
manipulation. For instance, a lucky farmer's
and exploiting it effectively.
land happens to be more fertile than that of
its neighbors', thus conferring advantage in Prepared luck
productivity. Or even better, owners of In a business context, luck often descends
farmland may find oil underneath or upon the firm from unique historical events,
reserves of other precious natural resources. changes in social cultural trends,
Such pure luck provides firms with breakthroughs in technology, shifts in
Richardian type of rents that cannot be customer tastes and demand, governmental
created proactively (Rumelt, 1984, 1987). regulation or deregulation, or private or
From the resource-based view of the firm, asymmetric information. These factors affect
Barney (1986) explains that luck, or path- different firms in asymmetrical fashion and
dependence to use a more formal term, create differentials among the firms along
creates unique endowments for some firms strategic dimensions, which dictate the
that can be used to conceive and implement firms' value creation and options for action.
inimitable strategy, enabling sustained Beyond pure luck, which is not controllable
competitive advantage. by the firm at all, the above factors often
present themselves to firms as mere
opportunities or threats upon which firms
Figure1 can act. Whether a particular firm is lucky or
Luck and competitive advantage: a framework not depends on its particular position,
endowment, capabilities, as well as its action
at the time.
Fate shuffles the cards and we play (Arthur
Schopenhauer)
[ 535 ]
Hao Ma Bower, J.L. (1986), Managing the Resource Lieberman, M. and Montgomery, D. (1988), ``First
Competitive advantage: Allocation Process, Harvard Business School mover advantages'', Strategic Management
what's luck got to do with it? Press, Boston, MA. Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 41-58.
Management Decision Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. (1996), Ma, H. (1999), ``Anatomy of competitive
40/6 [2002] 525±536 Coopetition, Currency/Doubleday, advantage: a select framework'', Management
New York, NY. Decision, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 709-18.
Burgelman, R.A. (1983), ``A process model of Mancke, R.B. (1974), ``Causes of interfirm
internal corporate venturing in the profitability differences: a new interpretation
diversified major firm'', Administrative
of the evidence'', Quarterly Journal of
Science Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 223-44.
Economics, Vol. 88, May, pp. 181-93.
Child, J. (1972), ``Organizational structure,
Marcus, B., Blank, A. and Andelman, B. (1999),
environment and performance: the role of
Built from Scratch: How a Couple of Regular
strategic choice'', Sociology, Vol. 6, January,
pp. 2-22. Guys Grew the Home Depot from Nothing to
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989), ``Asset stock $30 Billion, Crown Business, New York, NY.
accumulation and sustainability of Pascale, R.T. (1984), ``Perspectives on strategy: the
competitive advantage'', Management Science, real story behind Honda's success'',
Vol. 35, pp. 1504-11. California Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 3,
Evans, P.B. and Wurster, T.S. (1997), ``Strategy pp. 47-72.
and the new economics of information'', Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free
Harvard Business Review, September- Press, New York, NY.
October, pp. 70-83. Reich, R.B. and Mankin, E.D. (1986), ``Joint
Fortune (1995a), ``Cover story: how we did it'', ventures with Japan give away our future'',
2 October, pp. 69-86. Harvard Business Review, March-April,
Fortune (1995b), ``Open season on banks'', pp. 78-85.
21 August, pp. 42-52. Rogers, D.J. (1987), Waging Business Warfare:
Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C.A. (1988), Matsushita Lessons From The Military Masters in
Electric Industrial (MEI) in 1987, Harvard Achieving Corporate Superiority, Charles
Business School Publishing, Boston, MA. Scribner's Sons, New York, NY.
Hambrick, D. (1982), ``Environmental scanning Rumelt, R.P. (1984), ``Toward a strategic theory of
and organizational strategy'', Strategic
firm'', in Lamb, R (Ed.), Competitive Strategic
Management Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 159-74.
Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1989), ``Strategic
NJ, pp. 556-70.
intent'', Harvard Business Review, May-June,
Rumelt, R.P. (1987), ``Theory, strategy, and
pp. 63-76.
Jacobson, R. (1988), ``The persistence of abnormal entrepreneurship'', in Teece, D. (Ed.), The
returns'', Strategic Management Journal, Competitive Challenge, Ballinger, Cambridge,
Vol. 9, pp. 41-58. MA, pp. 137-58.
Kelly, G. (1976), ``Seducing the eÂlites: the politics Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D.E. and Teece, D.J.
of decision making and innovation in (1991), ``Strategic management and
organizational networks'', Academy of economics'', Strategic Management Journal,
Management Review, Vol. 1, pp. 66-74. Vol. 12, Winter Special Issue, pp. 5-29.
Application questions
1 What is the relationship between the 3 How does knowledge of the external sources
different scenarios in the typology of luck of potential luck help a firm improve its
and competitive advantage? chance proactively?
2 What are the critical challenges in profiting
from useful weeds and skunk work types
of individual or organizational
initiatives?
[ 536 ]