Afterschool Innovations in Brief: Focusing On Older Youth
Afterschool Innovations in Brief: Focusing On Older Youth
Afterschool Innovations in Brief: Focusing On Older Youth
Despite the many benefits of afterschool programs, far too many youth in middle
and high school do not have access to high quality programs during these critical
hours. We are pleased to join the Afterschool Alliance in recognizing and sharing
exemplary models of afterschool programs that work with older youth and help
put them on the path to success.
In recent years, study after study has demonstrated that afterschool programs
make a real difference for children, families and communities. The 8.4 million
children who benefit from these programs offer powerful evidence of their value.
Yet, millions of others have no afterschool programs available to them.
Right now, more than 15 million children are unsupervised after the school day
ends. Further, older youth are more likely to spend time unsupervised in the
hours after school, with more than 12 million in grades 6-12 responsible for
taking care of themselves after school.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 1
mentoring. Each brief combines statistics, comments from experts and
community leaders and examples of outstanding afterschool programs.
Through a competitive awards process that identified highly effective and lesser
known programs and models, six afterschool programs nationwide were named
MetLife Foundation Afterschool Innovators. In addition to being highlighted in
one of the four briefs, each of the awardees received a $5,000 grant to sustain
and expand their work.
Below is a brief summary of each of the four Issue Briefs and a description of the
six MetLife Foundation Afterschool Innovators. The full text of each brief is
included in this compendium, and can also be found on the Afterschool Alliance
website: http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/researchIssueBriefs.cfm
www.afterschoolalliance.org 2
Afterschool: The Challenges of Recruiting and Retaining Older Youth
Afterschool programs across the country provide critically needed services to our
nation’s children and families, however many afterschool providers find it difficult
to recruit and retain children once they enter middle and high school. Teens offer
afterschool a special set of challenges, which they must overcome in order to
attract and retain participants. Older youth are more autonomous, busier, better
able and more likely to articulate specific needs, and less appeased by activities
designed for a general audience. While older youth can clearly benefit from
participation in afterschool, programs must employ innovative strategies to attract
and keep older youth engaged.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 3
Owned Records program, teens create and produce their own music and
participants in the Volume Literary Arts Program write and perform slam
poetry.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 4
help build social and literacy skills. Field trips to colleges, universities and
industry sites, as well as engineering and science-related design
challenges excite students, sharpen their skills and increase their
awareness of career opportunities.
These four Issue Briefs examine just a few of the ways afterschool programs
support our older youth and families. Highlighting best practices and showcasing
some of the many exemplary afterschool programs build a powerful case that
afterschool is vital for successful youth, strong communities and healthy families.
________________________________________________
The Afterschool Alliance is a nonprofit public awareness and advocacy organization working to
ensure that all children and youth have access to quality afterschool programs. More information
is available at www.afterschoolalliance.org.
MetLife Foundation supports education, health, civic and cultural programs throughout the United
States. For more information about the Foundation visit www.metlife.org.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 5
Issue Brief No. 36 April 2009
The Afterschool Alliance, in partnership with MetLife Foundation, is proud to present the
first in a series of four issue briefs examining critical issues facing older youth and the
vital role afterschool programs play in addressing these issues. The four issue briefs
address workforce and career development; recruitment and retention of older youth;
dropout prevention and mentoring. These issue briefs examine just a few of the ways
afterschool programs support middle and high school youth, families and communities.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 6
security, and energy—will continue to grow, or at least remain stable while other areas
may contract.
In response to the current economic climate, workplaces are making changes associated
with increased productivity and innovation such as flatter management structures, just-in-
time inventory and flexible work arrangements – changes that are critical to our
economic recovery and future global competitiveness. v,vi However, we must also change
how we prepare our young people for the workforce. Advanced economies, innovative
industries and high growth jobs require educated workers who possess 21st century skills
such as: vii
• Critical thinking and problem solving
• Information technology application
• Teamwork and collaboration
• Creativity and innovation
• Social and cross-cultural skills
Further, the 21st century economy is a global one, and the U.S. must prepare its youth to
be knowledgeable about world regions and global issues and to communicate across
cultures and languages. The economies of China, India and Japan are expected to
represent 50 percent of the world’s GDP within 30 years. viii Currently, one in five U.S.
jobs is tied to international trade, a proportion that will continue to increase. ix As a result,
once in the workforce, today’s youth will most likely engage in commerce with other
countries, management of employees from other cultures and countries, collaboration
with colleagues from around the world and tackling global problems such as hunger,
climate change and disaster recovery. x
www.afterschoolalliance.org 7
In addition, U.S. students are faring poorly compared to their counterparts on
international assessments, such as the Programme for International Student Assessment
(PISA), which measures necessary 21st century skills like critical thinking and problem
solving. These results are significant – countries that do well on PISA demonstrate
higher increases in GDP growth. xiv Studies show that cognitive skills are significantly
more important in determining economic outcomes than the traditional measure of
educational success: school attainment. In other words, the amount of time someone
spends in school is not as important as what happens during that time, and what is learned
during that time must be broader than the current focus on minimum competencies in
reading, math and science. xv
Children and youth of all ages who participate in afterschool programs maintain better
grades, have lower rates of truancy, are more engaged in school and attain higher levels
of achievement in college. xvii Afterschool programs provide benefits to older youth that
reach well beyond the school day, offering avenues to college and the workplace by
exposing youth to global issues, providing opportunities to develop and use technology,
promoting cross-cultural understanding, collaborative thinking, leadership and civic
participation. xviii
• Global Kids is a New York City based nonprofit committed to educating and
inspiring urban youth to become global and community leaders – creative
thinkers, problem solvers, and contributing citizens prepared for academic and
workplace success. Through leadership development, academic enrichment and
digital media programs, Global Kids works with youth after school and online to
build digital literacy, foster substantive virtual dialogues about current events and
promote civic participation. Global Kids holds in-person and online youth
conferences, including roundtables and summer institutes at the Council on
Foreign Relations and online in Teen Second Life. Global Kids students create
action campaigns to educate Second Life participants about global issues and
www.afterschoolalliance.org 8
create educational video games in which players learn about social and global
issues. xix
Afterschool provides the perfect platform for older youth to acquire basic knowledge and
skills, while cultivating applied skills. By introducing real world issues and experiences,
afterschool programs can give youth access to a wider world. The skill building and
exposure to real work experiences help older youth think about their futures – some for
the first time.
Successful afterschool programs develop and promote strong relationships among youth,
schools, families, community organizations and institutions of higher education. The
afterschool field’s use of experiential, hands-on activities makes learning more holistic,
www.afterschoolalliance.org 9
authentic and meaningful. This approach provides older youth with the opportunity to
achieve the basics while engaging in projects they like, promoting civic responsibility,
helping prepare youth for higher education and the workplace.
• The Food Project in Boston provides local youth with afterschool employment,
education and skill development opportunities. These skills are developed
through partnering with adults to grow and distribute healthy food using
sustainable methods on four acres of urban farmland and 33 acres of suburban
farmland. Students (“interns”) work 8 to10 hours a week during the school year,
and 35 hours a week for eight weeks of summer. Different internship tracks
encompass unique sets of activities and goals, as well as a schedule based on the
demands of work. Students can choose from tracks such as community supported
agriculture (CSAs), diversity in groups, farmers’ market, kitchen/culinary arts,
rural enterprise/agriculture, serve and grow/recruitment, urban education and
outreach. Through this program, a diverse group of students participate in every
aspect of sustainable farming from the ground to the market to the table, and learn
to work collaboratively and attain leadership skills.
Conclusion
The future of the U.S. as a global leader depends on the ability of American workers to
think critically, act strategically and communicate effectively. Reinvigorating the
economy, achieving energy independence and taking advantage of growth industries
requires a skilled workforce that is ready to invent and create, apply knowledge of
different cultures, and be flexible to new and different ideas. Afterschool programs are
providing global literacy opportunities to youth who would otherwise be unable to access
them while helping youth gain the 21st century skills that employers want and need. As
the skills needed to compete in the workforce of the future continue to evolve, so will the
practices of afterschool programs. Today, afterschool programs fulfill many needs, not
the least of which is helping to keep America competitive. The extra learning time, and
time to develop leadership, teamwork and problem-solving skills, are essential to
ensuring that today’s youth are prepared for tomorrow’s workplace.
i
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007). Table 1. Employment by major industry sector, 1996, 2006, and
projected 2016. Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 9, 2009, from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-
bin/print.pl/news.release/ecopro.t01.htm. .
www.afterschoolalliance.org 10
ii
Phillips, J. (2008, May 14). Worried about layoffs? Here are 5 jobs immune to recession. The
Indianapolis Star. Indianapolis, IN.
iii
Council on Competitiveness. (April 2008). Thrive. The Skills Imperative. Washington, D.C.
iv
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1981). The Services Industry: Is it Recession Proof? Washington, D.C:
Urquhart, M. Retrieved February 19, 2009 from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1981/10/art2full.pdf
v
Black, S.E. & Lynch, L. What’s Driving the New Economy: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation. The
Economic Journal, 114, 97-116.
vi
U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Productivity and Technology.
(2007, May). Workplace Organization and Innovation. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Papers,
Working Paper 405. Washington, D.C: Meyer, P.B; Mohr, R.D., & Zoghi, C.
vii
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). Transition Brief: Policy Recommendations on Preparing
Americans for the Global Skills Race. Tuscon, AZ.
viii
Wilson, W. (2005). The Dawn of the India Century: Why India is Poised to Challenge China and the
United States for Global Economic Hegemony in the 21st Century. Chicago: Keystone India.
ix
U.S. Department of Commerce. (2004). U.S. Census Bureau, Table 2, Exports from Manufacturing
Establishments: 2001. Washington, D.C.
x
The Center for International Understanding. (2005). North Carolina in the World: A Plan to increase
Student Knowledge and Skills about the World. Raleigh, NC.
xi
Conference Board, Inc.; Corporate Voices for Working Families; Partnership for 21st Century Skills;
Society for Human Resource Management. (2006). Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers’
Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century U.S.
Workforce. Washington, D.C. Retrieved on February 20, 2009 from,
http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09-29-06.pdf.
xii
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness. A
Resource and Policy Guide. Tuscon, AZ.
xiii
Achieve, Inc. American Diploma Project Network (2005). Preparing Today’s High School Students for
Tomorrow’s Opportunities. Washington, D.C.
xiv
Hanushek, E., Jamison, D.T., Jamison, E.A, & Woessmann, L. (2008, Spring). Education and Economic
Growth. Education Next.
xv
Ibid.
xvi
The Conference Board; Partnership for 21st Century Skills; Corporate Voices for Working Families;
Society for Human Resource Management (2006). Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers’
Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century U.S.
Workforce. Washington, D.C. Retrieved on February 20, 2009 from,
http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09-29-06.pdf.
xvii
American Youth Policy Forum (2006 January). Helping Youth Succeed Through Out-of-School Time
Programs. Washington, D.C.
xviii
Asia Society. Partnership for Global Learning (2009). Expanding Horizons: Building Global Literacy in
Afterschool Programs.
xix
Asia Society, The George Lucas Educational Foundation (2007). Afterschool for the Global Age.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 11
Issue Brief No. 37 April 2009
The Afterschool Alliance, in partnership with MetLife Foundation, is proud to present the
second in a series of four issue briefs examining critical issues facing older youth and the
vital role afterschool programs play in addressing these issues. The four issue briefs
address workforce and career development; recruitment and retention of older youth;
dropout prevention; and mentoring. These issue briefs examine just a few of the ways
afterschool programs support middle and high school youth, families and communities.
Afterschool programs across the country provide critically needed services to our
nation’s children and families, however, many afterschool providers find it difficult to
recruit and retain children once they enter middle school and high school. Teens offer
afterschool providers a special set of challenges, which they must overcome in order to
attract and retain participants. For example, older youth are more autonomous, busier,
better able and more likely to articulate specific needs, and less appeased by activities
designed for a general audience. While older youth can clearly benefit from participation
in afterschool, programs must employ innovative strategies to attract and keep older
youth engaged.
Afterschool programs provide academic benefits to older youth during a period when
they may be losing interest or feeling disengaged from school. Studies show that when
older youth participate in afterschool programs they demonstrate: iii, iv
• Increased school attendance
• Improved homework completion
• Increased standardized test scores
• Increased socialization and problem solving skills
• Improved study habits and motivation
• Lowered risk of dropping out of school
www.afterschoolalliance.org 12
Furthermore, older youth who regularly participate in afterschool programs report feeling
more optimistic about their future and have higher expectations for themselves, including
an increased interest in attending college and exploring possible career paths. v
Financial constraints play a role in afterschool options for older youth. Despite the need,
no federal program specifically targets afterschool for the older youth population. And,
due to limited funding, local communities have been forced to make difficult choices
about how to use afterschool resources. Understandably, communities often make their
youngest students the first priority, but this leaves older
youth with few afterschool options. In some cases federal Afterschool and youth
resources, by law, can not be used for older youth, in development programs look and
others it’s a lack of sufficient resources or targeting that feel different for older youth than
makes it difficult to direct the funding towards programs for elementary school age kids.
for older youth: vii Teenagers are looking for
• The 21st Century Community Learning Centers programs that foster personal
(21st CCLC): 36 percent of centers serve middle growth, provide skill-based
school students, but only 20 percent of these learning, mentorship from
centers exclusively target this population; 15 adults and service learning
percent of centers serve high school students, with opportunities.
only five percent of centers exclusively targeting – School’s Out Washington,
high school students. 2008 Annual Report
• The Child Care Development Fund: Child care
vouchers can be used to support afterschool programs, but may only be used for
children ages 5-12.
• Supplemental Educational Services (SES): SES vouchers support after school
tutoring for children targeted under Title I, which is similarly focused on the
lower grades.
While additional funding is badly needed, other barriers exist. Many older youth face
external pressures such as the need for paid employment, caring for family or other
outside responsibilities, making it difficult to justify participating in enrichment activities
after school. Older youth may be hesitant to participate in a program that they see as
either an extension of the school day or as a place for younger children and considered
“uncool” by their peers. viii Often, older youth want free, unstructured time with their
friends, and believe that afterschool programs don’t relate to their needs. ix Further, some
afterschool programs face difficulty retaining the older youth who do join. Whether
stemming from biases, disinterest in the program, or alternative options for spending their
www.afterschoolalliance.org 13
time, many afterschool participants abandon their programs during the middle and high
school years.
It’s great when you can Promoting leadership and real world experience: Afterschool
teach the older programs can attract older youth by providing opportunities for
generations about this generating income and assuming leadership roles. Through paid
history and they get internships and/or access to real world experiences, afterschool
excited. I never thought I programs can address the desires for increased responsibility and
could teach other people leadership.
and they would listen.
But they do and it feels • MYTOWN (Multicultural Youth Tour of What's
good. – Christina Now) is a youth employment and development program
Tilghman, Youth in Boston, Massachusetts. The program educates low
Guide, MYTOWN and moderate-income teens about the history of their
families, neighborhoods and the city and then trains the
youth to lead walking tours and workshops for over 2,000 Boston residents and
visitors each year. By providing youth with paid work experience, a strong sense
of community involvement and a sense of worth, MYTOWN effectively engages
older youth’s desires for employment and responsibility and has positive effects
on both the program participants and the community at large.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 14
• The ICAN Peer Leadership Program in Chandler, Arizona works with students
ages 13-18 from an economically disadvantaged area.
ICAN’s Peer Leadership Program works closely with We think it’s great what
the Chandler Police Department Gang Unit to challenge they’re doing. Alcohol
a group of teens to develop and apply leadership skills is one of the biggest
in self-run community service projects. Since 2006, the problems we have in this
participants have been tackling underage drinking by community and this
establishing a community awareness and prevention helps keep it out of the
campaign throughout Chandler. The ICAN program, parties.
which also provides daily homework help, – Detective R. Kelley,
transportation and educational field trips, maintains a Chandler Arizona
high retention rate by addressing the desire for Police on the ICAN
responsibility and leadership opportunities among its Peer Leadership
teen participants. Program.
Studies show that older youth will remain in afterschool programs if they attend with
their friends and the programs center around their interests. xvi Successful afterschool
programs offer older youth the chance to participate in a wide variety of activities with
their peers, while getting the supports and supervision they need, such as help with
homework and engaging in a variety of learning experiences. xvii
• Harlem RBI is a youth development program in East Harlem, New York City
that utilizes a combination of sports, academics and a team environment to teach
and inspire youth to recognize their potential. In Harlem RBI’s Team Enrichment
Program, each teen plays on a baseball or softball team from January to August
and can also choose to play baseball or softball in the fall. This provides a year
round engagement in the program, ensuring that teens will remain involved in the
program and receive both the physical and social benefits of playing on a team.
The Team Enrichment Program also takes into account the growth of participants
by increasing opportunities and responsibility as youth rise through the program.
This innovative, sports-infused program ensures that its participants’ needs are
addressed and has a participant retention rate of over 90 percent.
• The Ann Arbor Teen Center Neutral Zone in Ann Arbor, Michigan offers
older youth opportunities to engage creatively and socially in their community.
The Neutral Zone is a drop-in program open to all teens in the Ann Arbor
community where members can come in when they have time to participate. The
activities are mostly self-run, offering responsibility and flexibility to participants
www.afterschoolalliance.org 15
resulting in high recruitment and retention rates. Adolescents involved in the
Neutral Zone can choose from more than 21 programs including community
leadership, education, literary arts, music performance,
Experience has shown visual arts and technology. For example, in the Youth
that teens become Owned Records program, teens create and produce their
interested and remain own music and participants in the Volume Literary Arts
invested in programs Program write and perform slam poetry.
if they are given the
opportunity to serve in Acting as a bridge between school and community: By building
authentic leadership a strong network that includes youth, parents, schools, and the
roles and initiate new community, afterschool programs can ensure that more youth are
ideas. willing and able to participate. Successful afterschool programs
– John Weiss, partner with community based organizations to provide engaging
Executive Director of programming and offer teens support and mentoring outside of the
the Ann Arbor Teen school day. By promoting strong relationships among youth,
Center Neutral Zone schools, families and the community, afterschool can recruit
participants and provide compelling programs that will keep older
youth in attendance. Further, afterschool staff who show that they enjoy being a part of
activities and reflect the genders and ethnicities of participants tend to be the best at
engaging students and ensuring their retention. xix
Conclusion
Although the benefits of afterschool programs for older youth are abundant, and
awareness of the need for afterschool is growing, many programs still struggle to recruit
and retain older students. Programs know that in order to be successful they need to
balance the interests and wants of older youth with the need to provide a safe and
enriching environment. Fortunately, afterschool providers across the country are
developing strategies and techniques that build on the interests of adolescents and
minimize barriers to participation, so that kids stay engaged in afterschool throughout
their middle and high school years. These successful programs are stimulating the minds
of our nation’s teens and preparing them for the future, while helping ensure that more
teens will have access to afterschool programs that are adept at fulfilling their interests
while also meeting their needs.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 16
i
Afterschool Alliance (2004). America After 3 PM: A Household Survey on Afterschool in America.
Washington, D.C. Retrieved April 8, 2009 from
http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/press_archives/america_3pm/Executive_Summary.pdf
ii
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids California (May 2006). California survey of teens. Teens at risk: incidence of
high-risk behaviors: Crime, gangs, drugs; need for after-school programs.
iii
Weiss, Heather B. (August 2004). Understanding and Measuring Attendance in Out-of-School Time
Programs Harvard Family Research Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project, 7.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/publications-series/issues-and-
opportunities-in-out-of-school-time-evaluation/understanding-and-measuring-attendance-in-out-of-school-
time-programs.
iv
Kennedy, E., Wilson, B., Valladares, S., & Bronte-Tinkew, J. (June 2007). Improving attendance and
retention in out-of-school time programs. Child Trends, 17. Retrieved March 24, 2009 from
www.childtrends.org/files/child_trends-2007_06_19_RB_AttendandReten.pdf.
v
Weiss, Heather B. (August 2004). Understanding and Measuring Attendance in Out-of-School Time
Programs Harvard Family Research Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project, 7.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/publications-series/issues-and-
opportunities-in-out-of-school-time-evaluation/understanding-and-measuring-attendance-in-out-of-school-
time-programs.
vi vi
Lauver, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H.B. (July 2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and
sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 6.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
vii
Afterschool Alliance (2009). Leveraging Out-of-School Learning to Boost High School Success: A
Proposed Federal Investment. Washington, D.C.
viii
Ibid.
ix
Lauver, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H.B. (July 2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and
sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 6.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
x
Lerman, R. I. (2000). Are teens in low-income and welfare families working too much? Washington, DC:
The Urban Institute.Available at www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=309708.
xi
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st
Century Community Learning Centers program. Washington, DC: Author. Available at
www.ed.gov/pubs/21cent/firstyear/index.html.
xii
Lauver, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H.B. (July 2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and
sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 6.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
xiii
Ibid.
xiv
Lauver, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H.B. (July 2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and
sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 6.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
xv
Afterschool Alliance (2009). Leveraging Out-of-School Learning to Boost High School Success: A
Proposed Federal Investment. Washington, D.C.
xvi
Anderson-Butcher, D., Newsome, W. S., & Ferrari, T. M. (2003). Participation in Boys and Girls Clubs
and relationships to youth outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 39–55.
xvii
Lauver, S., Little, P.M.D., & Weiss, H.B. (July 2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and
sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 6.
Retrieved March 21, 2009 from www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
xviii
Ibid.
xix
Herrera, C., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (2003). Increasing opportunities for older youth in after-school
programs: A report on the experiences of Boys & Girls Clubs in Boston and New York City. Philadelphia:
Public/Private Ventures.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 17
Issue Brief No. 38 July 2009
The Afterschool Alliance, in partnership with MetLife Foundation, is proud to present the
third in a series of four issue briefs examining critical issues facing older youth and the
vital role afterschool programs play in addressing these issues. The four issue briefs
address workforce and career development; recruitment and retention of older youth;
dropout prevention and mentoring. They examine just a few of the ways
afterschool programs support middle and high school youth, families and communities.
Yes, afterschool helps youth develop academically but, more importantly, it helps them
find their passion and better themselves long-term.
---U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan speaking at the Afterschool Alliance
“Breakfast of Champions” on April 28, 2009
Over one million students who enter ninth grade each year fail to graduate with their
peers four years later because they drop out of school. Seven thousand students drop out
of school every day, and each year roughly 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high
school. More than half of these students are from minority groups.i Afterschool
programs are a proven way to address the issues and risk factors that lead to dropout and
provide a path to graduation and beyond.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 18
Sixty eight percent of state prison inmates across the country do not have a high
school diploma.vii
Many of the above risk factors are a direct result of a school’s environment, including
available resources, student body performance and academic policies and practices. The
onset of standards-based reforms and high-stakes testing combined with tightened
budgets that strictly limit the availability of art, music, foreign language, science and PE,
increases the likelihood that at-risk students will drop out of school.xii Students who
might otherwise lose interest in school often remain engaged when they are presented
with an enriched curriculum that provides them with experiential, hands-on learning in a
wide range of subject areas such as art, music, foreign language, science and physical
education. Students themselves report a lack of relevant curriculum as a main reason
they drop out. A majority of dropouts surveyed felt that schools could improve the
chances that students would stay in school if they provided opportunities for real-world
learning, more engaging coursework and smaller classes with more individualized
attention.xiii
www.afterschoolalliance.org 19
for the broad variety of curricula and personalized instruction that keep students
interested in learning and committed to staying in school. Youth who participate in
afterschool programs improve in key areas that foster success in school, including social
and emotional development, increased interest and engagement in school and avoidance
of risky behaviors.xv These programs are especially crucial in reaching young people
who are most at risk at turning points as they transition from middle school to high school
and are searching for meaningful academic, vocational and recreational activities that
keep them invested in their own success.xvi
Children in LA’s BEST improve their regular school day attendance and report
higher aspirations regarding finishing school and going to college than their peers
who do not participate in the afterschool program. While LA’s BEST is a
program for elementary school students, they also engage older youth as
volunteers and mentors. Further, dropout rates among LA’s BEST students are 20
percent lower than the overall district dropout rate, highlighting the importance of
early intervention.xvii
Sixty-five percent of former Citizen Schools 8th Grade Academy participants
enrolled in high-quality high schools compared to 26 percent of matched
nonparticipants. The high school choice program takes advantage of Boston
Public Schools' policy of elective high schools. 8th Grade Academy apprentices
conduct research on high schools, including average test scores, dropout rates, and
college matriculation rates, and analyze the data to select what they consider to be
a high quality high school. Out of those who went on to enroll in an elective high
school, ninety-two percent of participants were promoted on time to the tenth
grade. This is critical, since earning promotion to tenth grade on time is a key
predictor of high school graduation (i.e. preventing dropout).xviii
Youth in the Quantum Opportunities afterschool program were half as likely to
dropout of high school and two and one half times more likely to go on to further
education after high school than their peers. xix
Several areas have been identified as effective strategies for dropout prevention. These
include: academic strategies such as mentoring and tutoring, service learning and
alternative schooling; making the most of instruction through
experiential learning and educational technology; making the When high school students get
most of the wider community through school-community authentic, hands-on
collaborations and career and technical education; and ensuring leadership experiences and
xx
that schools are safe places to learn. Many of these strategies exposure to careers, as they
are incorporated into high quality afterschool programs, making do through the After-School
them effective tools in preventing high school dropout. Apprenticeship Program, then
they have a reason to stay in
The After-School Apprenticeship Program (ASAP) is school and aim for college.
a national adaptation of the successful Chicago teen They’ve learned what it feels
apprenticeship program After School Matters, which like to do work they love, do it
allows high school students to explore a variety of career well, and be respected and
opportunities through training and paid work placements, rewarded.
helping them develop skills that translate to the -- Lucy N. Friedman,
president of The After-
School Corporation (TASC)
www.afterschoolalliance.org 20
workplace. The ASAP program offers high school students in New York City,
Boston and Providence the opportunity to be trained through an apprenticeship in
either the arts or sports. The students learn a craft alongside master practitioners,
and then apply these skills during paid summer internships where they work with
younger students. The After-School Corporation (TASC) piloted ASAP in 2008
at two sites in New York City with positive results. Student attendance rates
averaged between 80 and 90 percent, and program staff reported that participants
showed improvements in self-confidence, understanding of life skills and the
ability to work as a team. Students reported gains in problem solving skills,
leadership, patience and responsibility.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 21
Effective dropout prevention programs take a comprehensive approach, not only
addressing academic support, job training and school credits, but also addressing other
social and personal factors that often prevent students from succeeding.xxii
Conclusion
Successfully confronting the dropout crisis in this country will take a multi-faceted
approach that addresses the multiple risk factors common among high school dropouts.
One obvious facet to any dropout prevention strategy is encouraging and supporting
participation in afterschool programs. Participants in afterschool programs benefit from
personal skill building, academic enrichment, family outreach, engaging extracurricular
activities and, in some cases, opportunities to earn income, all within a safe environment
and positive peer group. Afterschool programs can prevent students from falling through
the cracks, ensuring that they receive the appropriate level of attention, instruction,
engagement and support to graduate from high school prepared for college, the modern
workforce and life.
i
Alliance for Excellent Education (February 2009). Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.
ii
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids California ( 2007). School or the Streets. Crime and California’s Dropout
Crisis. Oakland, CA.
iii
National Institutes of Health (2003). Pathways linking education to health. Bethesda, MD.
iv
C. Rouse (October 24, 2005). Labor Market Consequences of an Inadequate Education. Paper prepared
for the symposium on the Social Costs of Inadequate Education. New York, NY.
v
Alliance for Excellent Education (2006). Healthier and Wealthier: Decreasing Health Care Costs by
Increasing Educational Attainment. Washington, D.C.
vi
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids California (2007). School or the Streets. Crime and California’s Dropout
Crisis. Oakland, CA.
vii
Ibid.
viii
Bridgeland, J., Dilulio, J., & Morrison, K. (2006, March). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high
school dropouts. Civic Enterprises, LLC, in Association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates for the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Washington, D.C.
ix
Linton, D, Smink, J. (2007). Dropout Risk Factors and Exemplary Programs: A Technical Report.
National Dropout Prevention Center at Clemson University and Communities in Schools, Inc. Clemson,
SC
x
Ibid.
xi
Chen, X. & Kaufman, P. (1997). “Risk and resilience: The effects of dropping out of school”, quoted in
“Broadening the definition of at-risk students”, by Sephanie Bulger, and Debraha Watson, The community
www.afterschoolalliance.org 22
College Enterprise, Fall 2006. Retrieved June 11, 2009 from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4057/is_200610/ai_n17191868/?tag=content;col1
xii
Allensworth, E. (2004). “Graduation and dropout rates after the implementation of high-stakes testing in
Chicago’s elementary schools: A close look at students most vulnerable to dropping out”. In G. Orfield,
(Ed.), 2004. Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Harvard Education Press,
Cambridge, MA.
xiii
Bridgeland, J., Dilulio, J., & Morrison, K. (2006, March). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high
school dropouts. Civic Enterprises, LLC, in Association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates for the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Washington, D.C.
xiv
Afterschool Alliance (2008, July). Evaluations Backgrounder: A Summery of Formal Evaluations of the
Academic Impact of Afterschool Programs. Washington, D.C.
xv
Vandell, D., Reisner, E., & Pierce, K. (2007). Outcomes linked to high-quality afterschool programs:
Longitudinal findings from the study of promising afterschool programs. Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Washington, DC.
xvi
NYSAN (Spring 2009). Policy Brief: Pathways to Student Success: The Role of Afterschool Programs
in Increasing High School Graduation Rates in New York State. New York, NY.
xvii
Huang, D., Gribbons, B., Kim, K. S., Lee, C., & Baker, E.L. (2000). A decade of results: The impact of
the LA’s BEST after school enrichment program on subsequent student achievement and performance.
UCLA National Center for Research and Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing. Los Angeles, CA.
xviii
Fabiano, L., Pearson, L. M., Reisner, E. R., & Williams, I. J. (2006, December). Preparing students in
the middle grades to succeed in high school: Findings from phase IV of the Citizen Schools evaluation.
Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
xix
Hahn, A. (1994, October). Promoting youth development in urban communities: Unprecedented success
for the Quantum Opportunities Program. (A Forum Brief). Retrieved June 12, 2009 from
http://www.aypf.org/forumbriefs/1994/fb102894.htm.
xx
Shargel Consulting Group (2007). 15 Effective Strategies for Dropout Prevention. National Dropout
Prevention Center at Clemson University. Retrieved June 4, 2009 from http://www.schargel.com
/2007/12/17/15-effective-strategies-for-dropout-prevention/.
xxi
Nellie Mae Education Foundation; PlusTime NH; New Hampshire Department of Education. Supporting
Student Success through Extended Learning Opportunities. Concord, NH.
xxii
Wyckoff, L., Cooney, S.M., Djakovic, D.K., McClanahan, W.S. (September 2008). Disconnected Young
People in New York City: Crisis and Opportunity. Public/Private Ventures. Philadelphia, PA.
xxii
Youth Development Institute (March 2008). Promising Practices in Working with Young Adults. New
York, New York.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 23
Issue Brief No. 40 September 2009
The Afterschool Alliance, in partnership with MetLife Foundation, is proud to present the
final in a series of four issue briefs examining critical issues facing older youth and the
vital role afterschool programs play in addressing these issues. These issue briefs
address workforce and career development; recruitment and retention of older youth;
dropout prevention; and mentoring. They examine just a few of the ways
afterschool programs support middle and high school youth, families and communities.
Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with
caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement. Mentoring programs
have grown rapidly in recent years and now serve an estimated 15 to 20 percent of young
people who need the care and support of a mentor. i While that percentage translates to
three million youth, it leaves almost 15 million more youth unserved, many of whom are
from disadvantaged social and economic backgrounds or do not have caring adults in
their lives. ii Mentoring is a critical element in every child’s social, emotional and
cognitive development. It builds a sense of industry and competency, boosts academic
performance and broadens horizons. Along with parents, mentors help young people
realize their potential by providing them with support, advice, encouragement and
friendship. Afterschool programs, with their history of supporting families and
communities, are an ideal platform for successful mentoring programs.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 24
The positive effects of mentoring are well documented, and as a result, many mentoring
programs seek to expand their reach by integrating older youth as mentors to younger
children. These relationships not only provide participants with the same benefits as
traditional mentoring relationships, but also offer the youth mentors additional rewards
including: v
• High school credits
• Leadership opportunities
• Increased interest in social issues
• Greater respect for others’ cultures
• Increased knowledge of child development
• Increased personal and interpersonal skills
www.afterschoolalliance.org 25
based organizations – expanding the pool of administrators and volunteers and providing
more enduring relationships.
Afterschool can also facilitate the involvement of older youth as mentors, providing them
with a structured, familiar environment and supportive adults to help them fulfill their
commitments as mentors to younger children, benefitting all participants. xvi
www.afterschoolalliance.org 26
factors in keeping youth involved in afterschool programs – programs that inspire
learning, keep kids safe and help working families.
Conclusion
All young people have the potential to succeed in life and contribute to society; however,
not all youth get the support they need to thrive. Mentoring programs help give youth the
confidence, resources and skills they need to reach their potential. Afterschool programs
offer an ideal platform in which to implement the necessary components of a successful
mentoring program, ensuring positive outcomes for all participants.
i
Mentor (2006). The National Agenda for Action. How to Close the America’s Mentoring Gap.
ii
Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement.
Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-
3.pdf
iii
Ibid.
iv
Taylor, A., & Bressler, J. (1996). Mentoring across Generations: Partnerships for Positive Youth
Development. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, NY.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 27
v
Herrera, C, Kauh T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as
Mentors. Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study.
Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA.
vi
Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement.
Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-
3.pdf
vii
Spencer, R. (2006). Understanding the mentoring process between adolescents and adults. Youth
Society, 37, 287-315.
viii
Herrera, C., Sipe, C.L., & McClanahan, W.S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship
development in community-based and school-based programs. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA.
(Published in collaboration with MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnerhsip, Alexandria, VA)
ix
Blakely, C.H., Menon, R., & Jones, D.C. (1995). Project BE-LONG: Final report. College Station, TX:
Texas A&M University, Public Policy Research Institute.
x
Mentor (2005). Mentoring in America 2005. A Snapshot of the Current State of Mentoring.
xi
Grossman, J.B. & Rhodes, J.E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth
mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199-219.
xii
DuBois, D.L. & Karcher, M.J. (2005). Youth mentoring: Theory, research, and practice. Handbook of
youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA.
xiii
Herrera, C., Sipe, C.L., & McClanahan, W.S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship
development in community-based and school-based programs. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA.
(Published in collaboration with MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnerhsip, Alexandria, VA)
xiv
School based Mentoring. Mentor. Retrieved on July 6, 2009 from
http://www.mentoring.org/access_research/school_based/
xv
Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement.
Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-
3.pdf
xvi
Herrera, C, Kauh T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as
Mentors. Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study.
Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA.
www.afterschoolalliance.org 28