Judy Rojo Lawsuit Against Spitzer Homestead
Judy Rojo Lawsuit Against Spitzer Homestead
Judy Rojo Lawsuit Against Spitzer Homestead
CASE NO.:
JUDY ROJO,
Individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON,
a deceased minor.
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
______________________________________/
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff, JUDY ROJO, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, by and through the undersigned attorneys, sue
2. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff, JUDY ROJO, individually and as Personal
Representatives of the Estate of ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, was and is a
HOMESTEAD, INC., was and is a Florida Profit Corporation which conducted business within
Miami-Dade County, and maintained its principal place of business in Homestead, Florida. They
own and/or conduct business at 30101 South Dixie Highway, Homestead, Florida 33032.
4. Venue is proper in this Court as the incident giving rise to this litigation occurred
in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and Defendant’s principal place of business is located within
Miami-Dade County.
AUTOWORLD HOMESTEAD, INC., operated of a 2019 Dodge Charger, grey in color, vin
INC., was the owner of the Dodge Charger and/or had possession and control over the Dodge
Charger.
7. At that time and place, Amargos had the express and/or implied consent of the
8. At that time and place, Plaintiff, ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a minor, was
selling flowers with his family in, or near, the parking lot of a business neighboring SPITZER
Charger into the area where ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON and his family where selling flowers.
The Dodge Charger struck ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON and, that same day, ANTHONY ROJO
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, hereby incorporate and re-allege paragraphs 1
through 8 above as though they had been fully set forth herein and further state:
9. At all times material hereto, Amargos was employed by and/or operating the
Dodge Charger as an actual and/or apparent agent of the Defendant, SPITZER AUTOWORLD
HOMESTEAD, INC., subject to its control in the performance of said operation. Plaintiff, JUDY
LEON, a deceased minor, justifiably seek relief upon their belief that Amargos was acting within
the Defendant, SPITZER AUTOWORLD HOMESTEAD, INC.’s, authority at the time of the
subject crash.
15. As a direct and proximate result of said negligence, and the resulting death of
Plaintiff for all damages to which is entitled, including but not limited to:
E. Any and all other damages to which Plaintiff and/or the survivors may be
the Estate of ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, demand judgment in her favor
minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court for compensatory damages, including incidental and
consequential damages, post-judgment interest, costs, and for any other relief this Court deems
COUNT II:
CLAIM OF NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT AGAINST
SPITZER AUTOWORLD HOMESTEAD, INC.,
PURSUANT TO THE DANGEROUS INSTRUMENTALITY DOCTRINE
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, hereby incorporate and re-allege paragraphs 1
through 9 above as though they had been fully set forth herein and further state:
HOMESTEAD, INC., did knowingly permit and entrust its vehicles, including the Dodge
had reason to know that by entrusting a vehicle to Hanskabell Amargos, there was an
unreasonable risk of harm to others by virtue of the Amargos’ use of said motor vehicle(s).
18. As a direct and proximate result of said delegation, Plaintiff, ANTHONY ROJO
19. As a direct and proximate result of said negligence, and the resulting death of
Plaintiff for all damages to which is entitled, including but not limited to:
A. Pain and suffering by the survivors;
E. Any and all other damages to which Plaintiff and/or the survivors may be
the Estate of ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, demand judgment in her favor
minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court for compensatory damages, including incidental and
consequential damages, post-judgment interest, costs, and for any other relief this Court deems
COUNT III:
CLAIM OF NEGLIGENT HIRING AGAINST
SPITZER AUTOWORLD HOMESTEAD, INC.
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, hereby incorporate and re-allege paragraphs 1
through 9 above as though they had been fully set forth herein and further state:
HOMESTEAD, INC., did knowingly permit and entrust its vehicles, including but not limited
should have had reason to know, in the exercise of reasonable care, that by hiring Amargos, there
was an unreasonable risk of harm to others by virtue of the Amargos’ criminal past and/or use of
motor vehicle(s).
22. As a direct and proximate result of said delegation, Plaintiff, ANTHONY ROJO
23. As a direct and proximate result of said negligence, and the resulting death of
Plaintiff for all damages to which is entitled, including but not limited to:
E. Any and all other damages to which Plaintiff and/or the survivors may be
the Estate of ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, demand judgment in her favor
minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court for compensatory damages, including incidental and
consequential damages, post-judgment interest, costs, and for any other relief this Court deems
ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, hereby incorporate and re-allege paragraphs 1
through 9 above as though they had been fully set forth herein and further state:
HOMESTEAD, INC., did knowingly permit and entrust its vehicles, including but not limited
should have had reason to know, in the exercise of reasonable care, that by retaining the
Amargos as an employee, there was an unreasonable risk of harm to others by virtue of the
22. As a direct and proximate result of said delegation, Plaintiff, ANTHONY ROJO
23. As a direct and proximate result of said negligence, and the resulting death of
Plaintiff for all damages to which is entitled, including but not limited to:
E. Any and all other damages to which Plaintiff and/or the survivors may be
the Estate of ANTHONY ROJO DE LEON, a deceased minor, demand judgment in her favor
minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court for compensatory damages, including incidental and
consequential damages, post-judgment interest, costs, and for any other relief this Court deems
The Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by jury.