Transit Signage System Design

Transit Signage System Design
Theory & Practice

Special thanks!
To the SFMTA internship program. Especially
Lulu Feliciano, Chimmy Lee, and Kathleen Phu
for allowing me to be challenged and to pursue
this project.
To Derek Kim for the mentorship along the way.
To Umut Toker for teaching me that design

matters and to never stop learning new skills.
To the City and Regional Planning Department

at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, for the education
and support.
Part I.
The Importance of Signage
& Branding
1
INTRODUCTION
2
HISTORY
3
WHAT IS
WAYFINDING
4
THE BENEFITS
OF BRANDING
TRANSIT
BRANDING
5
PUBLIC
TRANSIT
TRANSIT
6
SIGNAGE
DESIGN
PROCESS
7
PRECEDENTS:
PARIS
LONDON
NYC
8
CONCLUSIONS
Part II.
Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit
Signage System Design
1
INTRODUCTION
2
PROBLEM
DESCRIPTION
3
METHODOLOGY
4
DATA ANALYSIS
5
VAN NESS
BRT SIGNAGE
SYSTEM
DESIGN
PROPOSAL
6
NEXT STEPS
Part I. The Importance of
Signage & Branding
9
Introduction
1.
Introduction
Signage system design and branding are the Part I of this report discusses the importance of
first elements of a transit system that users signage system design and branding through
come in contact with. The signage design, research and precedent analysis. Lessons
information provided, branding, interactions learned from the research are applied to San
with transit staff, and quality of service all make Francisco Municipal Transit Agency’s incoming
up a complete experience for the transit user. Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit corridor, in Part II of
The impressions one has with any of these the report. Part II shows signage system design
touchpoints can inspire one to continue using examples and illustrates how signage system
transit or prevent one from using it again. design and branding could make Van Ness Bus
Rapid Transit look and feel.
In a time where air quality is poor, resources
are scarce, and congestion is high, it is a transit
agency’s duty to provide high caliber public
transportation options for the community. The
best way to intrigue more users into choosing
transit is to provide a quality experience for the
user. The experience is not only the type of
service provided by the transit system, but it is
the way the transit system and its design make
users feel.
When signage system design and branding are

done right, users feel comfortable and safe, and
their transit trip seems simple. Convenience and
ease are some of the most significant influences
that bring people out of the automobile and into
the bus. Providing the right information at the
right locations and displaying it in a readable
way, makes transit decisions convenient and
easy.
10 The Importance of Signage & Branding
Art Nouveau
Paris Metro
entrances with
built in signage,
designed by
Guimard
11
History
2.
History
2.1 Signage Overview transit signage. Stations became more and

The history of signage begins with buildings more intricate with the growth of new systems
and commerce. Before public transportation (Berger, 2009). Clearly, the increased complexity
was readily available to everyone, small-scale of multimodal transportation options created
signage was used to indicate the purpose of a need for new types of signage and more
a building. These signs were generally small specifically, wayfinding (Ovenden, 2009) (Berger,
sized placards on building frontages or hanging 2009).
signs, projecting out from a business’s walls
over walkways. In America’s early settlements, In 1900, the Paris Expo Universelle marked a
literacy was not widespread, and pictographs change in iconic aspects of the time, a shift
were used instead of language on signage. As from the products of industry to environmental
literacy grew, words were used more and more marvels such as subways and escalators
on signage. (Treu, 2012) became the some of the most novel inventions
of the time (Ovenden, 2009) (Berger, 2009).
While technology advanced in the world, The shift from a general fascination with the
transportation options grew in Europe and product to marvels of the urban environment,
the United States. Horse drawn carriages presented a new paradigm in societies in
evolved to horse drawn streetcars, and later Europe and the United States. This time
electrification developed, as did electric period created a newfound need and care for
streetcars, automobiles, railroads, and environmental design and the need for more
subway systems. By the Early 20th century, intentional signage and wayfinding (Berger,
transportation system services were urban, 2009) (Ovenden, 2009).
regional, and long distance, with many different
service providers for each distance and mode of Signage fabrication styles evolved over time.
travel. (Berger, 2009) Projecting signs were initially popular, but
as mobility became pertinent to everyday
Signage for these many systems primarily life and streetcars and automobiles came
existed exclusively in conjunction with their to city centers, higher visibility signs were
architecture. Station buildings hosted all needed (Treu, 2012). Railroads made more
materials readily available on a broader market. influenced signage. Internationally, Bauhaus, a

Accessibility to new technologies in sign making German art school that melded function and
influenced evolving signage styles around the design, helped signage become more widely
country and abroad (Treu, 2012). incorporated into design (Whitford, 1994). The
Bauhaus movement urged for architecture,
While there were movements influencing the furniture, signage, painting, murals, advertising,
junction of architecture and signage, there were typography and more to be designed
others that disjointed the two. Many businesses harmoniously (Berger, 2009).
adopted electrification, leading to a wide range
of signage styles (Treu, 2012). The diversity of The popular French art movement, Art
styles could be distracting and overwhelm some Nouveau, also influenced signage in France
streets. In some instances, it became difficult to and abroad (BBC, 2012). Art Nouveau, like
have a symbiosis between architectural design Bauhaus, was an art form that took shape in
and signage. In others, architects embraced various formats. It was used in jewelry design,
signage and incorporated it into their deigns architecture, and poster design. In Paris, the Art
(Treu, 2012). Nouveau Metro entrances developed by Hector
Guimard incorporate signage in design and
Some cities wanted to control what was have become iconic symbols of the City (BBC,
acceptable in the public realm and created 2012).
zoning and building codes, restricting certain
architectural design and signage behaviors In London, Harry Beck initially studied to be an
(Treu, 2012). In any case, transportation signage engineer, veered from the path of engineering to
had to compete with the ever-growing business design graphics for the London Underground.
signage in order to stand out on the street In 1933, he designed the most renowned transit
(Ovenden, 2009). map in history for the London Underground.
He pushed transportation graphics into a
Popular signage and wayfinding styles in new realm of legibility by using principles of
transportation transcended from a basic engineering to guide his designs (Ovenden,
necessity, installed by anonymous sign painters 2009) (Berger, 2009).
out of the normal duties of transit agencies,
into a graphic art, designed by popular Later, modern art styles, such as those
artists of the time. Many artistic movements executed by multi-dimensional designer,
Left: The
Bauhaus school
encorporates
signage in
architecture
Right: Example
of competeing
signage in history
13
History
Comprehensive description of those who operate transportation
environmental agencies. Providing reliable service is most
graphics for important and engineers and planners usually
1968 Olympics,
manage that side of business (EMBARQ,
designed by
Lance Wyman
2011). Additionally, it is sometimes difficult for
transit agencies to justify spending money on
graphically designed signage systems.
However, transit agencies with well-designed

systems are not only more attractive at face
Massimo Vignelli, pushed signage and value, but good design has proved to have
wayfinding into a category of design that is both important co-benefits. Recognizable and
functional and artistic (Berger, 2009) (Shaw, informative design makes for safer transit
2011). Vignelli designed the transportation systems. It can also increase ridership and the
signage, graphics and transit map for the New public’s perception of public transportation
York subway in 1966 (Vignelli Website). Beck systems (EMBARQ, 2011).
and Vignelli masterfully elevated the techniques
of transit map designs and public transportation Many agencies have proven that creating a
graphics around the world. strong identity through branding their service
with graphic design and marketing improves
By the 1970s, environmental graphics (a union the perceived total customer experience and
of architecture and graphic design), wayfinding, increases ridership, when coupled with well-
and iconography were commonplace. (Berger, managed service. (Siikonen, 2006) (Hess &
2009) Environmental graphics emerged as a Bitterman, 2008) Now an integral and valued
newer profession made up of many different piece of planning for some transit systems,
people with differing backgrounds. Architects, graphic design enhances the service’s visibility
industrial engineers, advertising professionals, and popularity. (Siikonen, 2006) It also has the
product designers and more participate in the potential to draw customers from automobiles-
field (Berger, 2009). -a task that many cities wish to achieve. (Henke,
2007) (APTA, 2010)
By the mid 1980s, designing retail environments
was becoming increasingly popular with More recent studies around branding public
businesses. Corporate entities saw the power transit are centered on new Bus Rapid Transit
branding through signage and environmental options. Some of these studies suggest that
design (Berger, 2009). The field of environmental branding and imaging can account for a 10-
graphic design expanded from designing 20% increase in ridership (APTA, 2010).
for public places to designing environments
and signage for private firms. However, in Paris, London, and New York are examples of
some cases, public spaces doubled as retail cities having Transportation Agencies that have
environments, such as Times Square (Berger, experienced the benefits of great graphical
2009). signage design and branding. Their methods
and history are discussed in detail in Chapter 6,
2.2 Transit Agencies & Graphic Design the precedents section of this report.
As signage and wayfinding graphics evolved,
many transportation agencies grappled with
the concept of implementing good graphic
design. Graphic design is not usually in the job
Interpretive map,
based on people’s
memory and
understanding of
familiar geography
15
What is Wayfinding?
3.
What is Wayfinding?
3.1 What Is Wayfinding determine their own location within the transit
Wayfinding is spatial problem solving within setting. Next, a destination is determined
an environment to get from one place to and a plan of action from their location to
another. Signs, personal travel behavior, and the destination is decide upon. Without a
environmental cues such as architectural design predetermined cognitive map, users will need
and street furniture affect the perceived ease of to rely on signage systems, environmental
wayfinding. The wayfinding process for a transit cues, mobile apps, and asking for directions.
trip begins with a trip plan and leads to a path Even when a cognitive map is formed, users
of travel made up of decision points. Obtaining will still rely on external sources to support
trip information at the right time and place their decisions along the path of travel.
can be critical to correctly finding one’s way. (Transportation Research Board, 1996)
Signage and wayfinding system design provides
this type of crucial information. (Transportation Decision execution transitions the mental
Research Board, 1996) maps of trip segments into travel behaviors.
This is where actions are made to complete
A transit trip is broken up into three behaviors: trip segments. It is in the decision execution
decision making, decision execution, and process where signage systems and wayfinding
information processing. In the decision making cues in the environment help guide the
phase, trips are broken down into trip segments user to effortlessly complete trip segments.
and a cognitive map of each segment is made. (Transportation Research Board, 1996)
Breaking a transit trip down into segments
allows the user to better understand and Information processing is an important part of
remember the whole trip. (Transportation the transit trip. Information processing occurs
Research Board, 1996) throughout trip planning and travel actions.
This is where information is discovered and
Cognitive mapping is a way in which a user judged. Information processing has two forms
can plan their journey and understand their in the transit trip. The first form of information
trip segments to better prepare them for the processing is the perception of transit and
transit trip. When a user maps a trip, they first environmental information through sight and
other senses. The next is cognition and the to the user. (Transportation Research Board,
ability to translate the information into either 1996)
coordinate mapping or sequential mapping.
The goal of developing a transit signage
Coordinate mapping is small scale mapping and wayfinding system is to make the user
within a facility or boarding area. It is the experience friendly and helpful. A signage and
process of understanding transit functions, such wayfinding system should move riders between
as where to purchase a ticket and where to their origins and destinations efficiently, with
board within a constrained location. Sequential minimal effort exerted from the user. A well
mapping is the process of determining planned system, should be intuitive and useful,
directions and distances between points. It is without being oppressive. It should be easily
the comprehension of routes and trip segments. understandable and graphically pleasing.
(Transportation Research Board, 1996) (Transportation Research Board, 1996)
3.2 Signage System Design A transit signage system is developed using

Signage system design is not merely an several tools. First, the user and the user’s
artistic concern. Signage system design is needs must be defined and understood. Next
a physical and graphical system, which is the Transit Trip Model is assessed to structure
designed from psychological patterns of human wayfinding. Signage system and wayfinding
travel behaviors. It is intended to support design is built upon a foundation of user travel
travel behaviors within an environment. Travel behaviors and transit trip decision-making and
behaviors should dictate how the transit execution processes, discussed in section 3.1
environment takes shape. and in the Transit Trip Model (see facing page).
(Transportation Research Board, 1996)
The architecture and placement of platforms,
stops, stations, farebox locations and other There are a variety of user types to identify
visual cues are the first part of a signage and and plan for in a transit system. Most common
wayfinding system. Once trip behaviors are groups of users are (i) users familiar with the
understood and the site has been appropriately system and (ii) those who are unfamiliar with the
designed, signage and symbols can be planned system. In addition, designers must plan for the
for. The right type of transit information must be unimpaired and persons with disabilities such
placed at the correct location for it to be helpful as sight, hearing, and mobility impairments.
Signage system design in

Schiphol Airport displays
different information,
using different color
combinations and sizes
(Uebele, 2007)
17
What is Wayfinding?
All signage systems and wayfinding design Trip Model segments. (Transportation Research
must be in compliance with the Americans with Board, 1996)
Disabilities Act (ADA). (ADA sets standards for
public infrastructure that make public serving Once transit behavioral analysis is
facilities accessible to everyone.) Another accomplished, a signing and wayfinding
user group to plan for are those with literacy program can be designed. Sign typology and
impairments, these may be people who are placement are chosen based on the behavioral
unable to read and write, or those who do not needs of transit riders. Influencing sign typology
understand or speak English. and placement are the type of stop or station in
the context of the greater system and regional
The Transit Trip Model is based on the decision systems and the particular segment of a transit
points of transit trip segments, discussed earlier. trip a rider is expected to be in. Standardized
The typical transit trip is as follows: design guidelines are required to support the
signage program and maintain consistent
Transit Trip Model terminology, colors, symbols, sizes, shapes,
Trip Segment Decision Point
(Transportation Research and sign placement throughout the system.
Board, 1996) S0 Trip Planning Uniform signage solidifies a transit system’s
S1 Origin to Transit Facility identity, making the signage system more
Entrance/Platform readable and reliable to the user. (Transportation
Research Board, 1996)
S2 Transit Facility Entrance/
Platform to Boarding Area 3.3 More Than Wayfinding:
S3 Boarding Area to Vehicle Reassurance
Among a world that is technologically advancing
S4 Vehicle Enroute
daily, so is design and the expectations people
S5 Vehicle to Boarding Area have of it (Berger, 2009). People have learned
S6 Boarding Area to Transit to expect good design and clear brand identity.
Facility Exit Identity design is an important element of
designing environmental graphics (Berger,
S7 Exit to Destination 2009).
(S8) (Boarding Area to Boarding
It is essential that transportation agencies
Area—Transit transfer)
use methodical graphics that clearly identify
In reality, some users trips will make trips that their service. Imposition is a tool is used in
repeat certain trip segments or that are more environmental graphics for services such as
complex than what is listed, depending on the public transportation. Imposition allows signage
type of trip taken. For example, regional trips to stand out against competing environmental
or trips with one or more transfer points will be factors. This process strengthens branding
more complicated. However, the Transit Trip power but more importantly, it makes a user feel
Model is sufficient for the purpose of planning secure because the system is easily locatable
and designing a signage and wayfinding (Calori, 2007).
system. It is true that regional linkages and
Signage and wayfinding should effectively
transfer points must be considered in the
execute a consistent identity; this reinforces
designs, but the majority of the signing and
the agency’s character and helps users to
wayfinding program for public transit, such as a
instantly orient themselves amongst the layers
bus system will be developed around the Transit
of transportation systems found in metropolitan Different users navigate environments in

areas (Calori, 2007) (Berger, 2009). individual ways; user’s past experiences in
wayfinding, travel, and exploration play a big
To effectively execute a consistent identity, role in the level of comfort that users have with
transportation agencies must actively plan wayfinding. The more experience a user has
and implement signage systems. Signage put in travel, especially to unfamiliar places, the
up as an afterthought is ineffective (Berger, less anxious they are about wayfinding (Chang
2009). Transportation agencies should think 2013).
of signage as successful corporations do.
Corporations give users a positive experience Some studies have shown that there are
through signage and messages. Signage and differences in wayfinding behaviors between
wayfinding should assist customers and provide genders and between age groups. Females
them with a positive experience (EMBARQ, have been shown to have a higher level of
2011). Signage goes beyond identifying a anxiety than males if they feel they may become
transit agency, it helps a user understand unsafe or lost (Chang 2013). Other studies have
their environment and feel comforted by shown that age vulnerabilities exist as well.
seeing a familiar transportation option. It is Elderly people have been shown to be less likely
up to the transportation agency to craft a to visit unfamiliar routes than younger people
message about the transit system’s culture and (Chang 2013).
give the customer a good feeling about the
transportation agency values (Berger, 2009). Environmental signage must be tailored to a
wide range of users in order to be effective
Customer experience is more than instilling in reducing user anxiety. Transit signage
a brand that the customer can identify and systems designed with the Transit Trip Model
relate to, it is also about planning facilities in and that anticipate expected travel behaviors
a manner that serves the customer’s needs can make users with vulnerabilities feel safer
and expectations (Berger, 2009). Customers and familiarize them with their route. Signage
want comfort in their choices, they want feel enhancements can make these transit users
prepared, and they want to understand their feel more assured and thus, more likely to take
journey. Good signage systems reassure the transit.
rider and help them anticipate their travel
options (Berger, 2009). Environmental signage must be tailored to a
wide range of users in order to be effective
The key to effective transportation signage and in reducing user anxiety. Transit signage
wayfinding is to help the user form a mental systems designed with the Transit Trip Model
map of the service (Calori, 2007). Wayfinding and that anticipate expected travel behaviors
studies show that persons who are unfamiliar can make users with vulnerabilities feel safer
with the environment in which they are and familiarize them with their route. Signage
attempting to navigate show higher perceived enhancements can make these transit users
levels of anxiety than when familiar with the feel more assured and thus, more likely to take
environment (Chang 2013). If directional signage transit.
can help a user form a mental map, they will be
less anxious about wayfinding because they will
feel more familiar with the environment.
19
What is Wayfinding?
Transantiago Bus
Rapid Transit station
branding and signage
makes use of color and
pictograms for universal
understanding
LA Metro’s Opposites
Campaign markets Metro
and reinforces the brand
21
The Benefits of Branding Transit

4.
The Benefits of Branding
Transit
Wayfinding and signage design and graphics all the interactions a rider has with the system.
Signage system design is closely related to From trip planning, to signage and wayfinding,
branding. Wayfinding and signage design are to ingress, riding and egress, the experience
means of branding a system and informing the should be easy and pleasing to all the senses.
user (APTA, 2010). When planning a signage (Siikonen, 2005)
system, it is important not to dismiss the
brand identity of a transportation system. If the The quality of the experience should be enough
system has weak branding, it may be a good to entice riders to want to use transit over other
time to assess the brand and improve brand modes (Nordahl, 2012). There is a general
elements before investing in a comprehensive assumption in US culture that people who take
signage and wayfinding program. Signage the bus need to take the bus and that they
programs should support the system’s brand have no other option. Studies and reports have
and enhance its image (APTA, 2010). At the shown that this is not necessarily the case.
same time, wayfinding should not be neglected
Many people would take transit if the
because a system does not yet have a strong
experience were well designed and therefore,
brand.
joyful (Nordahl, 2012). Like corporations attract
Corporations study their users so they can new customers with user-centric branding
tailor their products and brand to the needs and design, so should public transit agencies
and values of their customers; transit agencies (Siikonen, 2005).
could benefit from the same. Transit agencies
EMBARQ, a non-profit planning program of
tend to underemphasize the user experience.
the World Resources Institute, dedicated to
There is a tendency to simply plan the service
sustainable transportation solutions argues
routes for customer needs but omit planning
that transportation agencies should market
the holistic experience around the customer
their services and invest in branding. We live in
(Siikonen, 2005). A quality experience should
a competitive marketplace (EMBARQ, 2011).
be planned for the multiple publics using transit,
Currently, the auto industry spends around $20
the familiar and unfamiliar users. The perceived
billion a year on advertising; in 2009, GM spent
quality of the system and service is a sum of
$3.2 billion. If a transportation agency spends
close to zero dollars on advertising, then it is not The American Public Transportation
competing in the market. Administration (APTA) recommends branding
transit, specifically Bus Rapid Transit systems,
Transportation agencies cannot afford to miss for several reasons in addition to becoming
out on branding and marketing (EMBARQ, eligible for funding. APTA states that branding
2011). Public transit needs to make a better helps differentiate one service over another,
impression on the public and prove its influencing riders to choose the well-branded
importance (Siikonen, 2005). Proper branding service over other options (APTA, 2010).
is an essential catalyst to improve the common,
negative perception of public transit (Siikonen, The nature of the branding process calls
2005). for improvements in outreach efforts and it
involves the target audience more intentionally
To be truly successful, transportation agency then usual, which can improve the public
communications teams need institutional perception of transit and the relationships
structure and dedication (EMBARQ, 2011). The between the community and the transit agency
chapters in EMBARQ’s From Here to There: A (APTA, 2010). By implementing good branding
Creative Guide To Making Public Transport The techniques, a transit system can increase
Way to Go, explains the structure that transit customer loyalty because the system will be
communications departments need in order to easier to use and more identifiable (APTA,
be successfully competitive. The structure is as 2010). A well-branded system can also attract
follows: a transportation agency should have a other economic activities to center around the
(i) brand and identity, (ii) internal communication, service, enhancing the existing corridor (APTA,
(iii) user education, (iv) user information systems, 2010).
(v) marketing campaigns, (vi) public relations
and external communications, (vii) user
feedback systems, and (viii) online engagement.
(EMBARQ, 2011) Without these basic
cornerstones of great branding and marketing,
public transportation agencies opt out of
competing in the market they are inherently
apart of.
EMBARQ makes a point to say that marketing

is an investment in a stronger public image.
A better image can attract new riders and
retain current riders (EMBARQ, 2011).
Increased ridership raises revenues and
demand (EMBARQ, 2011). This demand is
good for the future of public transit because
it can lead to political and financial support,
service expansion, and further investments
in transit improvements (EMBARQ, 2011).
In the US, branding transit can make certain
projects candidates for the Federal Transit
Administration’s Small Starts Program (APTA,
2010).
23
The Benefits of Branding Transit

VIVA Bus Rapid Transit
brand design
(EMBARQ, 2011)
LA Metro brand
25
Branding Public Transit

5.
5.1 Branding to choose its service, to reassure the user of

It is important that transit agencies see branding that they have made the right choice, and to
and marketing as a cyclic investment, not engage the customer, making them identify with
government propaganda. Enhancing public the brand’s unique and distinct imagery and
transit benefits the whole community, not solely language (Wheeler, 2009).
the transit agency (EMBARQ, 2011). Increasing
ridership with good graphical signage, Successful brands must differentiate themselves
marketing and branding has lasting effects on from other services (Neumeier, 2005) (Wheeler,
the community. Public transit users are generally 2009). An important way of differentiating is
healthier than auto users (Nordahl, 2012). to integrate the core values of the agency into
all elements of the brand (EMBARQ, 2011).
Public transit emits less pollution and uses less Another method of differentiating is to innovate,
fuel per capita than automobiles, especially as to be creative and stand out from the other
technologies continue to advance (Nordahl, services like yours (EMBARQ, 2011).
2012). Using public transit is less expensive
than using an automobile (Nordahl, 2012). A transportation agency should identify their
These effects cause cost savings for the user, main values and learn about their service from
which can transmit to more spending in the the customer’s point-of-view before they build a
local economy and lead to a more vibrant brand strategy (EMBARQ, 2011). It is necessary
community. Well-branded transit corridors also to know the audience in order to appeal to them
increase developments along the corridor; and (Wheeler, 2009). Furthermore, it is integral that
this adds to the economic benefits as well. an agency understand the complete customer
experience to learn how to communicate
5.2 Branding Public Transit effectively with their audience (Wheeler, 2009).
Branding is a process used to attract users but
The brand identity process can be summarized
more so, branding is a feeling one has about
in 5 steps (Wheeler, 2009). 1. Conduct
a product or a service (Neumeier, 2005). A
research, 2. Clarify the strategy, 3. Design the
brand is trusting and charismatic. A brand has
identity, 4. Create touchpoints, 5. Manage
three main functions: to navigate the customer
assets.
While the process seems straightforward, Start Tools to build a good

design excellence and tenacious management Communication customer experience
skills are vital components of the entire branding Early and relationship
process and cannot be disregarded (Wheeler, between internal
Agency staff members
2009). If designed and managed well, the Use internal and between the
brand should infuse into every level of the and external Agency and the
Build a Strong
business structure; it should be apart of the communication; community
Brand instill agency values
image, message and the feeling that staff and (EMBARQ, 2011)
customers are proud to support (Wheeler,
2009). Use creative
informational
A good brand strategy does more than appeal User Education outreach and trial
prototyping
to the customer--it inspires behaviors and
employees (Wheeler, 2009). Brand strategies
should be created in collaboration with the Maps, signs, real-
Systeamatize user time signage, fare
customer, the agency’s internal departments collection, audible
and staff, the director, and the designers or information announcements,
brand consultants (Wheeler, 2009). Brand schedules
strategy should align the agency’s vision
and actions with the goals for the customer Tailor Messages
experience (Wheeler, 2009). and Narratives to
Users
The brand strategy should lead to a big idea,
something the transit agency stands for
(Wheeler, 2009). All brand elements should
lead to one focused message, from one
voice (Wheeler, 2009). This big idea needs to
be consistently supported by the customer
experience for the entirety of the customer’s
interaction with the service (Wheeler, 2009). It
is vital that an agency stays on brand and on
message to reinforce their presence and prove
their importance as a transportation agency
(EMBARQ, 2011).
27

EMBARQ’s
messaging structure
for communicating
transit benefits to
different publics
(EMBARQ, 2011)
The
Branding
Process
(Wheeler,
2009)
Vignelli’s first transit

signage system
design for the New
York Subway
29
Transit Signage Design Process

6.
Transit Signage Design
Process
6.1 Contractual Relationship Site visits must be conducted as a means of
In order to effectively plan a signage system, understanding the area and how people access
the designers must understand complexities it (Gibson, 2009). It is necessary to spend time
and scale of the problem at hand. This is observing and documenting circulation patterns
not possible without knowing the client, in (Gibson, 2009). This way, a designer can better
this case, the transportation agency (Ubele, learn the user patterns and needs at specific
2007). For the process to move smoothly and locations within the site (Gibson, 2009). During
to develop a mutual understanding between the site visit, the designer will mark locations
the designer and agency, the designer must that serve as key decision-making points,
understand the business structure and have locations where general information may be
point of contact people to rely on (Baer, 2010). required, and natural circulation routes (Gibson
An agreement must be made ahead of planning 2009). This map will act as a “sketch” for future
between the designer and the Agency about signage placement and circulation route design.
the initial project definition, project magnitude,
and the expectations of each party, as best to 6.3 Data Analysis
the parties knowledge at the early stages of The site observations and the audience’s
partnership (Ubele, 2007) (Calori, 2007). responses will generate needs of the signage
program that the designer will make into
6.2 Data Collection tasks that will be addressed in planning and
Environmental and information designers design, and fulfilled upon implementation of the
agree that wayfinding and signage design, like final signage program (Mollerup, 2007). The
branding, must begin with research. To properly observational data collected at the site visit
develop signage that speaks to the user, it is will create a task list of important typological
essential to get to know the audience (Gibson signage needs and future placement (Mollerup,
2009). User interviews, focus groups, and user 2007). Analysis of the findings must be
profiles are methods used to get to know the documented to support reasoning behind future
audience’s needs, expectations, and affinities decisions (Mollerup, 2007).
(Gibson, 2009) (Baer, 2010) (Calori, 2007).
6.4 Planning surrounding context (Gibson, 2009). These are

Once initial research and analysis is complete, not the only types of signage but they are some
the designer can adequately define the problem of the most frequently used typologies.
to be solved and begin a strategy in response
(Gibson, 2009). With a better understanding of In planning the site map and sign typologies, it
the project, the designer and Agency will revisit is useful to understand what type of wayfinding
their contract. A lesson form private firms that strategy or combination of strategies is
could prove helpful to the development process necessary for the site. Four major strategies
is writing a creative brief, also known by some exist for wayfinding (Gibson, 2009). There is
as a document of mutual understanding, to get district wayfinding, which divides locations
the agency and the designer on the same page by zones (Gibson, 2009). Street wayfinding
(Baer, 2010). It is necessary that the Agency identifies corridors within a greater network
understands the designer’s workflow, timeline (Gibson, 2009). Landmark wayfinding uses
and goals for the project so as to achieve a major landmarks as nodes for wayfinding; and
symbiotic relationship with the designer (Baer, connector wayfinding connects all paths onto
2010) (Calori, 2007). one central location (Gibson, 2009).
At this point, the wayfinding and signage 6.6 Design

designer should create a final map with key Designing the physical signage and sign
decision points, needed signage locations, and content is a major step in the planning process.
circulation patterns identified (Gibson, 2009). The design development is a creative process
The type of signs most useful for all locations and must be flexible (Calori, 2007). All signs
should be detailed on the map as well (Gibson, should include innovative and consistent brand
2009). Generally for exterior signage, a designer image in their design, and thoughtful company
will choose from identification, directional, and messaging and tone in the content of the signs
regulatory signage (Gibson, 2009) (Mollerup, (EMBARQ, 2011). That being said, designing
2007). In the case for transportation signage, is a process that should not be stifled by too
orientation signs are also necessary. Oftentimes, many restrictions (Calori, 2007).
cities have regulations for sign placement and
Designing signage should start with idea
station organization at transit stops. In this case,
generation and sketching and should amount
the city standards must be adhered to.
to many options to choose from (Calori, 2007).
6.5 Signage and Wayfinding Strategy The designer must also consider mounting
Identification signage identifies a location, hardware, sign function, how their audience
entrance, ticket booth, transit stop, monument, reads signs, and viewing distances in the
or building (Gibson, 2009). Directional signage designs (Calori, 2007) (Baer, 2010). Informal
does just what it states, it directs (Gibson, pin-up sessions of the best options should be
2009). Examples include directing pedestrians held for many people to discuss; this is the time
through the use of arrows or other symbology, to become critical and assess the options. After
trailblazers, and vehicular directional signs; they deciding upon the best designs, messaging,
can be an explanation of where an identifier hierarchy and vocabulary can be discussed and
is located (Mollerup, 2007). Regulatory signs carefully chosen (Calori, 2007). After the creative
represent restrictions and regulations for design phase, economical considerations
entrances, exits, and behaviors (Gibson, 2009). and performance of mounting hardware and
Orientation signage shows a floor plan or a materials should be assessed in detail (Calori,
map of a location to orient the user within the 2007) (Ubele, 2007). Because the design stage
31
Transit Signage Design Process

is flexible, a non-linear process that revisits
previous steps in this process is expected
during the creative phase.
6.7 Programming
The designer and agency should test the
product after designs are complete. Prototyping
the signage to test effectiveness and beauty
should be done before a final design is
determined (Gibson, 2009) (Ubele, 2007).
While it may seem costly at first to prototype,

it is much more cost-effective to be certain
of the signage before all signs are ordered
and implemented (Gibson, 2009). It is also
important to test the final materials in the true
context of the site to observe how it preforms
in the surrounding environment (Ubele, 2007).
Before final materials are selected and ordered,
it is necessary to assess installation and
maintenance requirements and cost (Ubele,
2007). Easy to install and maintain materials will
be more cost effective as long as the materials
are able to withstand daily wear and tear
without frequent maintenance.
The site map will most likely go through several

iterations. The final map should act as a
program for implementation, therefor it must
be extremely detailed (Gibson, 2009). Typically
known as sign-programming documents, the
final map will be complimented by a list of all
the sign types used in the wayfinding program
(Calori, 2007) (Gibson, 2009). This inventory of
signs should include the location of each sign
within the site and the message of the sign
(Calori, 2007). Each sign on the map will have
a unique identification number that relates to
the sign list and placement location so it is clear
what type of sign it will be, and so that it is
individually traceable for inventory (Calori, 2007)
(Gibson, 2009). Scaled, elevation diagrams
of the specific signage types should also be
included for illustrative purposes (Calori, 2007)
(Gibson, 2009).
Paris transit maps

adhere to strict
branding and graphic
standards.
(Ovenden, 2009)
Transport for London’s

advertisements
for destinations in
London, accessible
by transit. Designs
follow strict guidelines
and brand style.
(Ovenden, 2013)
33
Precedents
7.
Precedents
Precedent I: Paris Metro in his designs, which was first instance of

Paris Metro graphic design, signage and environmental graphics for the system. The
wayfinding began in a piecemeal fashion. Over entrances were made of decadent, organic
the years different styles came and went. A shapes from the Art Nouveau style. The lettering
few times in the history, efforts to streamline that Guimard created for the entrances became
and unify styles were attempted, though popular for Metro signage. The lettering is so
not always entirely successful. After many iconic that even to this day, people identify it
design unification struggles, now RATP (Régie with Paris Metro. (Ovenden, 2009)
Autonome des Transports Parisiens, in English:
Autonomous Operator of Parisian Transports) Soon, signage changed to a more legible
the operator of transit in Paris intentionally style with white, sans serif lettering on blue
works to make signage and graphics consistent background. The new signs were made of
across the system and are cognoscente of the enamel, later replaced for ceramic. 120 Metro
importance of effective branding. Their recent stations opened within the first 10 years of
push for implementing thoughtful design has operation. Different stations and directions
been a success and makes their transit system received variations for station décor, signage
intelligible. (Ovenden, 2009) and lettering. By the 1920s all stations had
a candelabra with the word Metro on it to
The Paris metro system started small and grew distinguish them on the streets at night.
rapidly. This growth made cohesion in design (Ovenden, 2009)
challenging in a time when manufacturing
technologies weren’t as strong as today and Interestingly, Metro Maps were primarily printed
graphic design was not yet in the forefront of by department stores and used as advertising
product and system design. (Ovenden, 2009) for the store. Usually the first maps were street
maps with routes printed on top of the streets.
In the late 1800s and early 1900s Henri Soon map designers experimented with colors,
Guimard was hired to make subway station line weights and diagramming representations
entrances for the Metropolitain (later shortened of the Metro lines rather than incorporating them
to Metro). He included the title of the system into a geographic map. It was not until 1934
Left: Informational
maps are large and
easy to read
Right: Simple,
graphical stop lists
with transfers help
users find their way
that the transit agency began diagramming and Rudy Mayer to make the RER maps, which
printing their own maps. (Ovenden, 2009) have not changed much since their creation.
(Ovenden, 2009)
Signage styles varied from station to station
and year to year. The Metro and agency logos Metro signage and maps needed improvements
also varied over time. Some efforts to unify as well. A new team, Patrice Rouxel and Yo
the system were made but maintaining all of Kaminagai worked on stylizing the map. They
the stations across the huge network of Metro had settled on a new, highly legible map design,
routes and stations proved to be a daunting with a new font, Neue Helvetica. By 1989,
task. Attempts to modernize the system were the agency called for restructuring. Kaminagai
made in the 1950s, but nothing really stuck until became head designer and the agency adopted
the 1960s. (Ovenden, 2009) another logo. (Ovenden, 2009)
Given the lengthy names of some stations, In he 1990s and 2000s signage systems and
Frutiger, a font designer, developed Univers branding improved. The map was redeveloped
Condensed to help longer names fit on one line. once again, now the most legible of all.
By the 60s, the system adopted Universe font Kaminagai and Rouxel made the new map
for all signage, maintaining the blue background more compact and even more legible than
and white lettering as a nod to the Metro’s before. Now they were reproducing the map
history. Signage replacement was incremental. in pocket size, medium format, large format,
Usually broken or damaged signs would be and as a tourist map--with more details of
replaced with the new standards but there geography. They also created maps for late
was not an overhaul to replace all signage. night service. (Ovenden, 2009)
(Ovenden, 2009)
It wasn’t until the 90s that consistent unified
The system continued to expand and spread, graphic design and signage was put up
becoming increasingly complex with more and across the system. Previously, lists of routes at
more information that needed to be graphically platforms and hard to read line maps existed
portrayed. Not only did the Metro grow, but the until recent brand changes took place. Now
train system that connects to the Metro known even platform route lists are diagrammatic and
as the RER, also added a significant amount show transfer points. Local area maps with
of service. By the 70s Massimo Vignelli was backlighting were installed outside of stations to
contracted to rebrand the train system and inform riders of their immediate location around
improve graphic communications. He hired the station entrance. Online maps, mobile
35
Precedents
Left: Next stop line
maps are consistent
with the graphic style
and illuminate next
stops
Right: RATP’s
Graphics Standards
Manual for graphics
on signage
applications, and real-time arrival systems and did it better than any other transit system.
are also in place for riders to use. Enhanced The elements of design put forth by London
station architecture and customer amenities and Underground set precedence for systems
infrastructure are also explicitly designed for. like Paris Metro and the New York Subway.
(Ovenden, 2009) (Ovenden, 2013)
RATP has shown that over the last two In the mid 1800s, the London Underground
decades, they have designed for the holistic signage system was basic but it had most
customer experience from trip planning to of the elements signage designers should
destination. Since the 90s, RATP has developed achieve: consistent lighting, station name
a graphic standard manual, which dictates the signage aboveground and belowground, and
“dos” and “don’ts” of their signage design and intentional architecture for entrances and
branding style. The new signage, wayfinding stations. However, interagency joint ventures
and graphic design standards are a success and private operators impeded the progress of
and received an Honorable Mention at the planned transit signage system design. Some
2008 Design Management Europe Awards for stations, owned by private operators, disjointed
the non-profit section (DME, 2008). (Ovenden, architectural styles and graphic unification.
2009) (Ovenden, 2013)
Precedent II: London Underground Between 1870-1890, signage and advertising

Since the beginning in 1863, London were becoming increasingly important in the
Underground saw the importance of world. The London Underground adopted
comprehensive signage systems and designed larger, more recognizable signage systems
their transit system with purpose and craft. that stood out amongst a crowded street. The
Architecture, lighting, maps and signage were agency made maps as promotional tokens
planned for and implemented. During this time, to highlight their service above other transit
the London Underground was known as the service providers in the City. This form of
Met (for Metropolitan). (Ovenden, 2013) marketing pushed publicity and map design
to be increasingly important. Maps became a
In its early days and even in the mid 19th successful tool to attract new customers and
century, the Met acted as a company like any promote new and existing lines. (Ovenden,
other, competitive in its marketplace. Ahead 2013)
of its time, it intentionally used branding,
wayfinding, information graphics and signage—
In the late 1800s, there were three competing Top: Clear signage
railways in London, the Met, the District and strong branding,
and the Central London Railway (CLR). The clearly designates
subway entrances.
competing railways pressured each other to
design better systems in order to outcompete. Middle: Beck’s 1933
Vehicle design, subway station interior decor, graphical transit map,
aboveground architecture, map design, and already with brand
signage system design were among some of identity. This map
the elements to improve from this marketplace revolutionized transit
competition. (Ovenden, 2013) map design.
In the early 1900s, the London Subway had Bottom: Transport

finally achieved one consistent look. Wayfinding for London’s
signage cues were installed and one brand brand identity and
identity and station “look” on the street down messaging are so
successful, they sell
to the subway existed. Architectural materials,
souvenirs.
colors and signage became unified. A name
and logo was chosen, one “message” was
becoming apparent for the subway. An
“Underground” logo was being used, and the
term “Tube” (meaning subway) was decided
upon as standard terminology for the agency
signage. A corporate identity emerged.
(Ovenden, 2013)
By the mid 1900s, trials and errors lead to many

iterations of branding languages and graphic
signage styles. Different operators continued to
compete in the world of marketing, branding,
and signage system design. Simplified maps
with clear, colored lines became commonplace,
as did the red and blue circular logo of the
Underground. (Ovenden, 2013)
The Underground began planning the signage

system around passenger travel flows. Signage
systems were important more than ever before.
Cartography and signage were redesigned so
that they could provide the needed information,
be easily legible, and graphically consistent.
In 1933, Harry Beck created a map based
on 45-degree angles and color-coded lines,
which became one of the most famous maps in
history. (Ovenden, 2013)
37
Precedents
New stations and lines were adopting the were not implemented correctly. The TA also
unified style of the Underground. One typeface had problems with the underground signage
was chosen and standards were set for systems being inadequate. (Shaw, 2011)
signage, logos, lighting and other architectural
wayfinding cues. The Underground sought Some signage was developed for Boston in
to be clean, crisp and modern. A graphics the mid 1900s to improve the confusion in the
standards manual was designed and subways. At that time the 1964/65 World’s Fair
implemented to systematize the signage and pressured the TA to advance its signage system
wayfinding design process. (Ovenden, 2013) and environmental design. The TA held a
competition for a new map and commissioned
The graphic standards manual is updated a new logo. The head of the Planning
regularly and remains as important today Commission judged the contest; he declared
as it ever was. It encompasses all forms of that the maps were too complex for the public.
transport governed by Transport for London: The contest was not a success and finally, the
underground, “overground,” and busses; it TA hired Unimark International (co-founded by
also incorporates general wayfinding signage. Massimo Vignelli) to guide the new maps and
The graphics of the London Underground are signage system. (Shaw, 2011)
recognized internationally as great design and a
model for transit signage systems. The graphic Unimark created a basic, modular signage
style fosters a sense of pride from passengers system with uniform typefaces and type
about their system. The system branding is so sizes. The TA did not have the funds to pay
successful that Transport for London even sells Unimark for more than the basic signage
their logo and signage designs on apparel and designs. Therefore Unimark did not oversee
trinkets to locals and tourists alike. (Ovenden, implementation and the TA did not acquire
2013) graphic standards manual from Unimark.
Instead the TA took the advice from Unimark
Precedent III: New York Subway and proceeded to attempt implementing the
designs through their own sign shop. The result
In the late 1800s and into the 1900s, New was that sign shop misread the designs and did
York City had an array of transit signage. not automate the signage fabrication process.
Most signage was made of tiles and several The signage system turned out messy and not
typefaces were present. As with many transit as intended by Unimark. (Shaw, 2011)
systems, too many sign systems existed and
the user information became confusing. In 1957 The new signage system was not supported
a designer, George Salomon approached the fully throughout the whole subway system
New York City Transit Authority (known as the and some vehicles had not been updated
TA) and urged them to improve signage system to match the new subway lettering, leading
design. He even provided design ideas and to more rider confusion. The lack of a fully
suggestions to the Authority. (Shaw, 2011) implemented signage system caused trouble.
While the signage system was designed to
In 1958 the TA published their first official map provide wayfinding cues throughout the user’s
per Salomon’s recommendations. He designed trip, some signs were missing. The TA failed to
the map based on Harry Beck’s map for the implement a unified and coordinated signage
London Underground. An attempt to improve system as recommended by Unimark. (Shaw,
general transit signage was made around 2011)
this time as well. Unfortunately, the signs
By 1968, Unimark was rehired. This time system. Temporary signs are often made to
Unimark was allowed to design a complete fix short-term problems, these signs usually
Graphics Standards Manual, which set are not take down in a timely manner and
standards for the new signage system. They clutter the existing system. Matching the
were also allowed to oversee fabrication and technologies of LCD and LED signs to the
implementation. (Shaw, 2011) graphic standards set up for the system has
also been a challenge. The signage manuals
In 1980 the TA completed an informal update have been helpful when stations and transit
to the1970s Graphics Standards Manual. modes undergo renovations and improvements.
At this time, the diagrammatic map, initially (Shaw, 2011)
designed by Vignelli was determined not to
be geographically correct enough for public
use. Additional changes were made to reflect
service hours of routes on maps and signage.
The original signage with black type on white
backgrounds was reversed to white type on
black backgrounds to reduce the need of
frequent maintenance. In 1984 the TA hired
Hertz Associates to complete a formal update
to the Manual. (Shaw, 2011)
In 1989 another manual-- the Sign Manual,

developed by the New York MTA (Metropolitan
Transportation Authority,) created standards for
signage for the TA, Long Island Railroad, and
Metro-North Commuter Rail. This manual took
elements from past standards and interjected
some new standards such as a change to
Helvetica from Standard typeface, new sign
sizes, adding colored bands to signs, and
dropping the modular system. (Shaw, 2011)
In 1994, the MTA received a new logo to

symbolize the unification of multi-modal transit.
Electronic fare cards were introduced and with
them came a revision to the Sign Manual. Not
only was the manual revised but also a new
in-house communications document titled
Service Identity Manual was created to include
guidelines for MetroCards, stationary, maps,
kiosks, booths and vehicles. (Shaw, 2011)
The signs of New York transit continue

to become more and more unified as
station renovations occur. However, some
inconsistencies still plague the unified signage
39
Precedents
Top: New York City
Subway signage has a
unified and recognizable
identity. The white letters
stand-out against the
noise of the subway
activities.
Bottom: Unimark’s
revsions to the first
Graphics Standards
Manual. (Shaw, 2011)
Transport for London’s

style is unified and
identifiable. Special
advertisement boxes
make Transport
for London’s own
advertisements stand-
out over the paid
advertisements.
41
Lessons Learned & Best Practices

8.
Lessons Learned & Best
Practices
8.1 Lessons Learned dedicated to making the transit legible, stylistic,
8.1.a Paris and unified.
Paris was a system that went from incremental
fixes to holistic changes. At first, changes were 8.1.c New York
small and not unified throughout the system. When New York first decided to hire a group
It wasn’t until the 1990’s that Paris’ system to improve signage design and legibility, they
became all-encompassing. The signage, maps, did not have the funding or staff to support
and brand became stylized in a unified way. the changes or follow-through with proper
Paris hired a team of experienced designers implementation and monitoring. Design
to lead the transition from piecemeal fixes to a improvements were incremental until they finally
comprehensive signage and branding program. had the ability to hire consultants to design,
They now follow a graphic standards manual make revisions, and oversee implementation.
for new signage. They continue to redesign and A signage standards manual was developed
improve upon the existing signage system. The to assist the process and guide future signage.
signage system is well-designed, organized, While, signage is fairly unified, graphically
and legible. pleasing, and legible, the system still faces
some piecemeal fixes. Different municipalities
8.1.b London govern different transit modes and passenger
Since the beginning, London’s underground has information, leading to less unification than the
been a leader in signage and transit branding. preceding systems.
They have a unified signage style, a strong
and identifiable brand, and they even market 8.2 Best Practices
their transit. They have worked with a graphics A signage system must be planned for the
standards manual since the early days and transit trip user and their travel behaviors.
continue to improve upon the manual. The
A signage system should be planned
manual is extensive, covering multiple modes of
comprehensively and include all types of
transit signage. They consistently improve upon
passenger information that will be present in the
the manual, making additions and revisions to
future.
it. Transport for London has a team of designers
A signage system and the environmental design

of the transit infrastructure should make users
feel safe and comfortable.
A signage system should be identifiable,

attractive, unified, and readable.
A transit mode and its signage system should

have a recognizable and value-driven brand.
A transit agency should have the institutional

organization to plan, design, implement,
monitor, and update the signage system or
employ those who can complete these tasks for
them.
Lessons Learned & Best Practices
43
Part II. Van Ness Bus Rapid
Transit Signage System
Design Proposal
45
Introduction
1.
Introduction
Part I introduced findings from literature about This is a perfect opportunity for San Francisco
the importance of designing signage systems to showcase a holistically designed signage
with purpose and for the benefit of the user. system and new branding strategies. This
The findings will inform the planning and design senior project is meant to present an example
process presented in Part II. Part II develops of the opportunity available to make Van Ness
example strategies for a signage system for the BRT a model in transit signage system design
proposed Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit route in and transit branding.
San Francisco, California, using the principles
discussed in Part I. The Van Ness BRT signage system could also
serve as a pilot program for the entire Muni
The Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit (Van Ness system. The Van Ness BRT signage system
BRT) route will span a 2.2-mile stretch on Van could eventually be implemented across the
Ness Avenue between Mission Street and remainder of the system, especially any future
Lombard Street. Van Ness Avenue is a major BRT projects. If the signage system design and
thoroughfare in San Francisco; it is part of branding proposal is well received, it would be
the US 101 regional highway system and it recommended to develop a comprehensive
is an important leg of San Francisco’s transit signage and branding design standards manual
network. The transit system in San Francisco for San Francisco’s BRT and eventually for
is commonly known as Muni (for Municipal the entire Muni system. This would create
Railway,) a name that took hold well before unity among information, signage design,
the San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency and branding and ultimately improve the user
(SFMTA) was formed. Muni is operated and experience.
maintained by the SFMTA. Muni is composed
of bus, subway, light-rail, and historic streetcar Chapter 2 in Part II describes the methods for
and cable car services. (SFCTA, 2013) data collection. Chapter 3 analyzes the data.
Chapter 4 explains the Muni system signage
The signage system design proposed in Part II context. Chapter 5 shows Van Ness BRT
would service the future Van Ness BRT Corridor. signage system designs. Chapter 6 explains
The Van Ness BRT route will be the first BRT the next steps for Van Ness BRT design
system to be implemented in San Francisco. implementation.
46 Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit Signage System Design Proposal
SFMTA’s transit
shelter is attractive
and identifiable,
however, the system
map is difficult to read
because it presents
too much information
on one map
47
Problem Description
2.
Problem Description
SFMTA operates the Muni system, which serves allow for assistance with signage and branding
about 222 million riders a year. The SFMTA design. BRT is a rapid service similar to a
manages a fleet of about 1,000 vehicles, many subway, except it uses buses and designated
of which they will be replacing in the next few bus lanes for its service rather than trains and
years. SFMTA maintains approximately 3,500 tunnels. New funding sources that come with
on-street Muni stops and 4-Muni-only subway projects like these could be used to create a
stations and share 9 stations with Bay Area complete Signage Standards Manual, a signage
Rapid Transit (BART.) maintenance program, rebranding, and some
signage fabrication. Allocating a team of staff
It has been a challenge for the SFMTA to members to oversee and manage this type of
update all vehicles, bus stops, platform stops, overhaul would be an added cost. The project
and stations with the newest Muni signage would require ample staff time to complete
style. It has also been difficult to keep up with properly.
basic Muni system wear and tear. The newest
Muni signage has populated much of the According to the BRT Standard (a rating system
system but there are still many old, outdated for Bus Rapid Transit routes,) signage systems,
signs present in the system as well. Thus far, branding, and station design all gain BRT
the Agency does not have a way of tracking routes points towards the rating. The ultimate
the age, location, or types of signs within the goal of the BRT Standard is to set international
system. best practices for BRT design and to compare
BRT systems with one measure. The Standard
Maintaining and updating the Muni stock rates them as gold, silver, bronze, or basic
is a challenge for budgetary and staffing based on the points earned. The BRT Standard
reasons. The Agency prioritizes making capital advocates for well-designed BRT systems and
improvements and service enhancements with encourages comprehensive signage systems
the budget, as they should. However, with and branding for BRT. If SFMTA follows
the new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) mode being the standards, Van Ness BRT could be an
introduced, San Francisco has the opportunity exemplary model for BRT in the nation.
to apply for new funding sources that could
Each vehicle, stop, and station communicates Unlike London,

a message to Muni riders. The overall look and Paris, and New
feel of the system sends a message about York, SFMTA’s transit
signage is not unified.
Muni’s service, as does the types of information
Many differing styles
displayed. When information is confusing exist in the system.
or missing, as is the case with some Muni The signage does not
signage, users get a negative impression of present one, strong
the system. It is important that Muni riders can identity.
easily understand how and where to ride in the
vast, multi-modal system and that they can
quickly locate themselves within the system.
Understanding these basic components helps
riders feel comfortable and makes them more
likely to return to public transportation in the
future.
In addition to the general transit system,

SFMTA is introducing a completely new form
of transit to San Francisco with Van Ness BRT.
The system design for Van Ness BRT should
be planned as a unique rapid route within the
larger Muni system but it should also look and
feel like it is still apart of the larger system. With
strong signage system planning, ahead of route
construction, it is possible to make Van Ness
BRT a starting place for a systemwide transit
signage design standard and maintenance
program.
49
Problem Description
The yellow bands do
not look like typical
transit signage, they
do not relate to Muni
colors, nor are they
easy to locate.
51
Methodology
3.
Methodology
3.1 Strategy more credibility to the information collected

Understanding the users’ opinions about the because it neutralizes the weaknesses of any
transit system and how they interact with the one method by combining the strengths of
system, are arguably the most important pieces multiple research methods (Iacofano, 1991).
of data to collect. Because of the sensitive
nature of this project in San Francisco and 3.2 Methods & Instruments
the Agency’s recent dedication to high profile 3.2.a Online Survey
changes, a complete assessment of user Online surveying is a method used to achieve
opinions and assessment of real-user needs responses to desired questions. As with all
was not met by this senior project. In the future, methods, there are strengths and weaknesses
it is highly recommended that the SFMTA of the online survey. It is a useful tool for
preform a full public outreach campaign during gathering anonymous responses at the leisure
the planning process and before deciding upon of the respondent. The potential disadvantage
final signage and infrastructure designs. is that users must know how to operate a
computer, have connection to the Internet and
For the purpose of this stage in the design be willing to respond. Distributing surveys to
process and in the SFMTA’s endeavors, only the correct target audience can be challenge
two methods were used to collect user data. because the surveyor must have access to the
Ideally, when a full outreach strategy would respondent’s e-mail addresses or be able to
be planned, triangulation would be used to catch the respondent’s attention by strategically
collect information about Muni users and their placing a survey online.
preferences. Triangulation is the process of
using multiple methods of collecting information An online survey was conducted to gather a
(Iacofano, 1991). general sense of the types of transit signage
users prioritized and which types they found
Triangulation helps a designer understand to be most helpful. The survey was distributed
the user more holistically because they are twice by e-mail to the City and Regional
using multiple approaches as opposed to one. Planning Department at Cal Poly. The e-mail
Triangulation is an integrated strategy that gives list was easy to obtain. Other efforts to acquire
e-mail lists were unsuccessful. Unfortunately, peak hour evenings over the course of a week
the results are skewed to a certain type of user between December 27th and January 3rd.
rather than the general transit user, who would
have many levels of understanding of urban Trip making decisions are influenced by the
environments. information presented at transit stops. Behavior
mapping is a way of documenting the user’s
The survey showed images of different types of actions. Users who on-boarded a bus were
on-street and in-vehicle transit signage. It asked recorded as well as users who left before a
users to rate the usefulness of the signage and bus’s arrival. The information collected shows
then to rank similar types of signage in order of which signs are most useful to a user’s trip
importance. based on the percentage of user’s who viewed
the signs and those who changed their trip
This allowed the respondent to determine behaviors after looking at those signs. The data
whether a sign was useful and then to rank collected from observing user behaviors will
the usefulness of the signs by prioritizing them. influence signage types, sign information, and
Asking the respondent to prioritize signage put sign placement for future stops on the Van Ness
the respondent in the signage system designer’s BRT corridor.
role by allowing them to make the decisions a
designer would need to make when choosing
sign types. The benefit of having a respondent
decide priority is that unlike a designer, they are
choosing in terms of pure usefulness and not
influenced by monetary or feasibility contexts.
3.2.b Behavior Mapping

Behavior mapping is a method of systematically
observing user behaviors and their interactions
with transit signage. Different stops along
Van Ness were observed during peak times.
Peak times were chosen for the high ridership
times, so as to provide the observer with more
subjects for observation in a short amount of
time.
Both northbound and southbound stops were

observed. Choosing varying stops along the
corridor is meant to maximize the types of
users that would be affected by future bus stop
changes. Ideally in the future, a more expansive
data collection would occur, stretching the time
period for collecting data over different weeks
and months to gather as much data from
differing weather conditions, work schedules,
and other factors that could impact user
behaviors. However, due to time constraints,
behavior mapping was only practiced on several
53
Methodology
Tally sheet used
to record user
behaviors
55
Data Analysis
4.
Data Analysis
4.1 Online Survey route line maps and 1.49 for local walking
The online survey yielded 55 responses. maps. This shows that both maps are helpful,
Because of the limits to access to a wide and contextual trip information will ultimately be
range of respondents, the respondents are the deciding factor for which is most necessary,
primarily young and familiar with transit. About or whether both are useful at one stop.
53% of respondents were between the ages
of 18-24 and 42% were between the ages of Respondents preferred digital in-vehicle
25-34 years old. 67% claimed they take transit signage, showing the next stops on the
often; and 27% take transit occasionally, the route over the static sign with the transfer
remainders take transit very rarely. points printed at each stop. One respondent
suggested in the comments section to provide
When asked to prioritize which types of on- transfer information on the digital next-stop
street signage respondents thought were most route sign to make up for the lost information
useful, digital real-time arrival signs ranked from the printed sign.
highest. The second highest were stops with
static city maps showing transit routes, route It is important to note that not all transit stops
numbers and the stop name signs. The static need all the information possible. The amount
route map and stop name rank last. of information needed is dependent on the trip
segment, trip behavior, and the environment
This shows that riders feel that up-to-date, of the stop location within a path of travel.
digital information is most useful. After which, For instance, at a stop where no transferring
obtaining the most information available through routes exist and where there are only very local
signage without the use digital options, were amenities nearby, much less information is
found most useful—as in a city map showing needed than at a stop where many decisions
routes and. The signage with the least amount may be made, as with a regional transit and
of static information was ranked last. local transit junction. The responses from the
survey will aid in deciding on sign types at areas
When ranked, route line maps and local area where more transit information is required.
walking maps both ranked about the same
position with an average ranking of 1.51 for
4.2 Behavior Mapping Example Questions with Responses From the Online Survey
A total of 173 people were observed during
the behavior mapping observations. While On-street experience: Please prioritize the usefulness of
observations were completed during evening each type of on-street information from most (1) to least (3)
peak periods, they were also completed important.
around winter holidays; therefore, the sample
size is expected to be smaller than what may
occur during a typical workweek. The data
from this group of people shows the behavior
of Muni transit riders at stops along the Van
Ness corridor. The locations where data was
collected were: Van Ness and Market, Van Ness
and Grove, Van Ness and McAllister, and Van
Ness and Eddy.
The most significant trend with the peak period

users was users checking the digital real-time
arrival display. In general, about half (49%) of
all Muni users used the digital real-time arrival
display to inform their trip behavior. In some
instances, Muni riders left the stop before the
bus arrived, after checking the digital display.
This indicates that the user decided to alter their Real-time arrival signs Static route map and stop Static city map with route
intended travel route based on the displayed without stop name name map and stop name
arrival times. In most cases, Muni riders
remained to wait for the bus even after checking
the digital display.
Only two groups of Muni riders, totaling 7

people checked the static printed Muni system
route map of the total 173 observed. The small
proportion of people checking the printed map
is expected because of the nature of peak
period travel being mostly comprised of users
who are very familiar with the route they are
taking. Therefore, familiar riders do not need
added information that systemwide maps
provide.
57
Data Analysis
In vehicle experience: Please prioritize the usefulness of in-
vehicle trip information from most (1) to least (2) important.
Digital route maps that Printed line maps that show

show the next stops transfer points
Please prioritize the usefulness of each map from most (1) to

least (2) important.
Route line map with City walking map with stop

destination information locations and route information
59
Design Proposal
Van Ness BRT Signage System
5.
Van Ness BRT Signage
System Design Proposal
5.1 Introduction maps. At stops where there are multiple
The Van Ness BRT Signage System Design will transfers towards many directions, a local
provide example signage systems and branding walking map with all transit stop locations and
styles, which could be used to influence a route information is recommended.
Van Ness BRT or systemwide Muni design
standards manual. It provides the types of 5.1.a Informational Signage System
signage system design discussed in Part I and The passenger information recommended for
from the Data Analysis section. It will provide Van Ness BRT, is real-time arrival displays at
an example programing list, which could be all stops, systemwide maps showing one’s
used for an implementation and maintenance location within the system, and Van Ness BRT
program. route maps. At stops where there are multiple
transfers towards many directions, a local area
The data shows that passengers would like the walking map with all transit stop locations and
maximum amount of information when given route information is recommended in addition to
the choice, and above all, they respond very the system signage.
well to digital real-time-arrival display signs.
While the maximum information is not always 5.2 Overall Considerations
necessary, it is recommended to provide ample The overall signage system uses the Corridor
information at junctions and on rapid routes. Wayfinding Strategy. All signage and
APTA, EMBARQ, and the BRT Standard all environmental design is planned around the Van
recommend maximizing information at BRT Ness BRT corridor. Identity and orientation sign
stops. Maximizing information will also ease the typologies are used to identify the stops and to
transition from the use of local buses to the new orient the user. Orientation signs are primarily
form of rapid transit in San Francisco. designed to inform the user about the Van Ness
BRT corridor. Orienting the user within the Muni
The passenger information recommended for system as a whole is secondary to the Van
Van Ness BRT, is real-time arrival displays at Ness BRT corridor orientation signage.
all stops, systemwide maps showing one’s
location within the system, and BRT route
The same red that is presented in the SFMTA have its own Rapid brand logo or acquire the
logo (C:0, M:87, Y:80, K:0) was chosen to overall system brand. However, the station
represent Muni. Muni already uses red as a design, and if possible, the bus livery, should
defining color. Choosing the same red would provide a unique environmental identity for Van
make it easy for SFMTA to show that Muni is Ness BRT that differentiates the BRT corridor
part of their holistic brand, which also serves from the general Muni system.
other modes of transit. The bright red gives
Muni a bolder brand identity and provides
context within a bigger brand at the same time.
Muni uses the Univers font family. Univers is a

readable sans-serif font that is common among
transportation signage. Maintaining the same
font family is perfectly acceptable for Muni.
However, mixing two fonts or choosing a font
that is less common among transportation
systems could develop a more unique brand
identity for Muni.
5.2.a Flag Sign

The flag sign is an identification sign typology.
It is developed to provide the user with a
description of the service provider, the location
of the stop, and the routes served by the stop
with their destinations. The design was intended
to simplify and streamline the amount of
information presented in a small space.
In the example flag signs, two font families

were used. In one, Univers Condensed was
continued throughout the whole sign for its
narrow features, keeping the sign free of excess
clutter. In the second, Avenir was used for
route numbers, as it is a wider and simpler font,
making the numbers standout while Univers
was maintained for the informational text.
Two options were provided for the Muni logo

to show the comparison between a distinctly
rapid identity and a general Muni identity. The
BRT Standard and APTA recommend branding
BRT systems with a BRT-only brand. In the
case of Muni, Van Ness BRT will continue to
be integrated within the Muni system and will
not be a completely separate BRT system as
is such with some agencies. Therefore, it could
61
Design Proposal
Left: Newest Muni
signs. Vertical
organization of route
numbers can feel
overwhelming to the
user when many
routes are shown.
Muni logo can be
difficult to read when
made small and is
being viewed from a
distance.
Right: Old Muni Metro

identification sign style,
still used today.
These styles are two

of the most prominent
Muni branding styles
that are on-streets
today. Others exist.
Multiple visible brands
create confusion
about which service is
Muni service.
Left: A standard Muni

sign, using all Univers
Condensed typeface.
Modular sign for easy
replacement of any
one sign segment.
Middle: A Standard
Muni sign with Avenir
route numbers and
Univers Condensed
for the body.
Right: A Van Ness

BRT sign with a
BRT branded logo
and Avenir typeface
throughout.
The signs provide

examples of what a
strong Muni brand
could look like. The
designs are not final,
elements could be
mixed and matched.
63
Design Proposal
5.2.b Route Map

The route map simplifies the route and provides
transfer information to synthesize the most
important passenger information and make it
more directly readable than a system map. It is
used for abstract orientation, orienting the user
to the Van Ness BRT corridor context, rather
than the systemwide context.
5.2.c Local Area Map

The Local Area Map orients the user within
the context of a small walkable area, including
transfer points to additional transit options. The
local area map is especially recommended for
the Van Ness and Market station. This station
has the most transfer options along the route
and many stops nearby are not located in the
same place. The example map for Van Ness
and Market shows all transit routes and the
boarding location for each form of transit.
5.2.d Digital Displays

The existing LED digital displays at Muni stops
could be used for Van Ness BRT shelters. In the
Behavior Mapping observations, it was noted
that users had to make an added effort to view
the displays because they are located within the
shelter; one must walk inside or near the inside
to view the display. This is not ideal for the Van
Ness BRT platforms, which will be located in
the center roadway. Thus, it is recommended
that displays be located on the inside and on
the backside of the shelters to allow for viewing
from the crosswalk or sidewalk.
65
Design Proposal
This local area map focuses on trasnsfer points to other transit lines at
Market Street. It clarifies to the user where transit stops are located.
Left: Route 47 Van

Ness BRT rapid line
map, showing the
rapid route integration
into the local route
service and transfer
points along rapid
segment.
Right: Route 49 Van

Ness BRT rapid line
map, showing the
rapid route integration
into the local route
service and transfer
points along rapid
segment.
67
Design Proposal
5.2.e Station and Vehicle Branding Muni transit shelters

Three options were designed to showcase are identifiable and
have an interesting
prominent branding through architecture and
design.
environmental design. The shelters and barriers
were designed to give a sense of movement
or moving forward, a feeling that should be
associated with rapid transit such at Van Ness
BRT. The bright Muni red embellishes the
shelters and colorizes the barriers, connecting
the BRT platforms to the style of the existing
Muni shelters. The flag sign, real-time displays,
systemwide map, and route map are shown in
context of the boarding platform in the designs.
69
Design Proposal
Muni buses have a
unique look, however
the Muni logo is
small and it is difficult
to identify who the
service provider is.
Top: Muni bus

branded to make
Muni’s service stand
our. Could be used for
systemwide Muni bus
service or BRT service
only.
Bottom: Muni bus

branded for Van Ness
BRT with a slanted
logo, to give the Muni
logo more movement.
71
Design Proposal
47 Van Ness Rapid
Van Ness & Sacremento
49 Van Ness / Mission Rapid
Van Ness & Market
Van Ness & Market

47 - 5 min
North Point
49 - 10 min
North Point 11
southbound
47 49
Lombard 76 Lombard 76
Van Ness Mission / Van Ness

Union 41 45
GGT
Union 41 45
GGT
to Caltrain to Geneva
Vallejo Vallejo Daily 5:30am-12am Daily 5:30am-12am
Jackson 10 27 Jackson 10 27
311 www.sfmta.com Stop ID: 00000
Tickets
Sacremento 1 Cable Car
GGT
GGT
Van Ness
Van Ness
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Geary 38/38L GGT

Geary 38/38L GGT
Eddy 31 Eddy 31
McAllister 5 McAllister 5
Market 6 9/9L 71/71L F MuniMetro Market 6 9/9L 71/71L F MuniMetro
Mission 11 14/14L Mission 11 14/14L
4th & N T E
Townsend 12 30 45 108
Muni Bus Route Muni Bus Route

Muni Historic Streetcar Muni Historic Streetcar
Muni Metro: J, K, L, M, N, T Muni Metro: J, K, L, M, N, T
Major Interchange Major Interchange
Muni Bus Rapid Transit Stop Phelan Muni Bus Rapid Transit Stop
Golden Gate Transit Loop Golden Gate Transit
Caltrain 43 K Caltrain
311 www.sfmta.com Stop ID: 00000 311 www.sfmta.com Stop ID: 00000
0 5’ 10’ 20’
73
Design Proposal
Van Ness & Market
Van Ness & Market
47 Van Ness Rapid 49 Van Ness / Mission Rapid
Van Ness & Sacremento Van Ness & Sacremento
47 - 5 min
49 - 10 min RA P I D
North Point North Point 11
southbound
47 49
Lombard 76 Lombard 76
Van Ness Mission / Van Ness

Union 41 45
GGT
Union 41 45
GGT
Vallejo Vallejo Daily 5:30am-12am Daily 5:30am-12am
Jackson 10 27 Jackson 10 27 311 www.sfmta.com Stop ID: 00000
Tickets
GGT
GGT
Van Ness
Van Ness
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Geary 38/38L GGT

Geary 38/38L GGT
Eddy 31 Eddy 31
4th & N T E
Townsend 12 30 45 108

0 5’ 10’ 20’
75
Design Proposal
Van Ness & Market 47 Van Ness Rapid
49 Van Ness / Mission Rapid
47 - 5 min
Van Ness & Market

North Point
49 - 10 min RA P I D
North Point 11

Lombard 76 Lombard 76 southbound
Union
Vallejo
41 45
GGT
Union
Vallejo
41 45
GGT
47
Van Ness
49
Mission / Van Ness
Jackson 10 27 Jackson 10 27
Daily 5:30am-12amD aily 5:30am-12am

GGT
GGT 311 www.sfmta.com Stop ID: 00000
Van Ness
Van Ness
Tickets
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Sutter 2 3
GGT
Geary 38/38L GGT

Geary 38/38L GGT
Eddy 31 Eddy 31
4th & N T E
Townsend 12 30 45 108

0 5’ 10’ 20’
77
Next Steps
6.
Next Steps
While Muni does have some well-designed An overall Muni or Muni BRT brand should
signage, stops and vehicles, it does not have be created as well. Along with this process,
one identifiable and unified system or brand. internal and external stakeholder outreach and
To achieve the goal of creating a bold and education would need to be accomplished.
recognizable system like London, Paris or New Creative messaging with friendly tones should
York, extra actions would need to be taken. be written for reoccurring signage, such as
announcements for construction work, service
First, added data collection should be delays, temporary stop closure, temporary
expanded to include a large sample size of Muni re-routing, and more. Advertisements such as
users. The data would further inform the types portable pocket maps or posters, advertising
of passenger information that best suit Muni destinations by Muni, could also be developed
users. Data should also be gathered from Muni during this stage. Finally, all language and
users to help the Agency create a brand that imagery must support the Agency values and
speaks directly to Muni users and that stands speak to the Muni user.
out among the other transit agencies serving
San Francisco. The final signage designs should be prototyped
with the proposed materials for assurance
A Graphics Standards Manual would have to that the designs are appropriate for the true
be crafted. A group of staff members would materials. Any decided alterations should be
need to gather to list all types of signage and made and tested again.
passenger information, including pamphlets,
fact sheets, and temporary signage. Ideally, A programming list, designating each sign,
the same group would oversee the design and its typology, and exact location within the
planning process for the signage and branding signage system should be made. This should
system. One standard should be developed be processed in a database, accessible by the
and documented that regulates layout, color staff overseeing the signage implementation
scheme, typeface or group of typefaces, and evaluation. Installation dates and expected
spacing and type sizes, vocabulary, logos, and maintenance schedules should be attached to
the like. each sign in the programming list to streamline
post-installation monitoring. The designers and

Muni staff should oversee implementation to
ensure signage is being fabricated and installed
properly.
Finally, all signage should be evaluated after

installation for user effectiveness and physical
quality. This step should be well documented
and revisions to the Graphics Standards Manual
should be addressed as a result of the findings.
Next Steps
79
81
References
References
American Public Transportation Association. Iacofano, D. (1986). Public Involvement in
(2010). BRT Branding, Imaging and Marketing. Environmental Planning: A Proactive Theory for
Washington, DC: APTA. Program Design and Management. Ann Arbor,
Mich: University Microfilms International.
Baer, K. (2008). Information Design Workbook :
Graphic Approaches, Solutions, and Inspiration. Institute for Transportation and Development
Gloucester, Mass.: Rockport. Policy. (2013). The BRT Standard. New York,
NY: ITDP.
Berger, C. (2009) Wayfinding : designing and
implementing graphic navigational systems. Katz, J. (2012). Designing Information : Human
Factors and Common Sense in Information
Minneapolis: Quayside Pub Group. Design. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Calori, C. , & Chermayeff, I. (2007). Signage
and Wayfinding Design : A Complete Guide Lovell, S. (2011). Dieter Rams : As Little Design
to Creating Environmental Graphic Design as Possible. London: Phaidon.
Systems. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.
Mollerup, P. (2013).Wayshowing> Wayfinding.
Chang, H. (2013). Wayfinding strategies and Basic & Interactive. Rev. Ed. Amsterdam:
tourist anxiety in unfamiliar destinations.Tourism Uitgeverij Bis.
Geographies, 15(3), 529-550.
Neumeier, M. (2005). The Brand Gap. [Kindle
EMBARQ. (2011). From here to there: a dreative Version] Retrieved from Amazon.com
guide to making transport the way to go. World
Resources Institute, Washington. Nordahl, D. (2012). Making Transit Fun!: How
to Entice Motorists from Their Cars. [Kindle
Federal Transit Administration. (2011). Metro Version] Retrieved from Amazon.com
Orange Line Evaluation. FTA Report No. 4.
Ovenden, M. (2009). Paris Underground : The
Gibson, D. , & Pullman, C. (2009). The Maps, Stations, and Design of the Métro. New
Wayfinding Handbook: Information Design for York, N.Y.: Penguin Books.
Public Places. New York: Princeton Architectural
Press. Ovenden, M. (2013). London Underground by
design. London: Penguin Books.
Graphic Design in Architecture. (2011). Hong
Kong: Design Media Pub. Ltd. Shaw, P. (2011). Helvetica and the New York
City Subway System : The True (Maybe) Story.
Henke, C. (2007). “How Customer-Appealing Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Design and Branding Win New Riders: Data and
Best Practices.” Presented at the annual APTA Siikonen, M. (2006). Popularity through
Bus and Paratransit Conference, Nashville, May. branding and design. The Future of Public
Transport. Retrieved from
Hess, D., and A. Bitterman. 2008. Bus
Rapid Transit identity: An overview of current http://best2005.net/Public-reports/The-Future-
“branding” practice. Journal of Public of-Public-Transport
Transportation 11(2): 19–42.
Skiles, M. , & Howarth, J. (2012). From signs to A view from the interior (2013). Retrieved from:
minds: Spatial information design and mental www.flickr.com Creative Commons.
maps. Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 312-325.
Davidpc_ (2011). Retrieved from: www.flickr.
Transportation Research Board. (1996). com Creative Commons.
Guidelines for Transit Facility Signing and
Graphics. TCRP Report 12. Dave R (2013) . Retrieved from: www.flickr.com
Creative Commons.
Treu, M. (2012) Signs, streets, and storefronts
: a history of architecture and graphics along Dory Kornfeld (2007). Retrieved from: www.
America’s commercial corridors. Baltimore: flickr.com Creative Commons.
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derek Flack (2011.) Vintage Signage in Toronto.
Tumlin, J. (2012). Sustainable Transportation Retrieved from: http://www.blogto.com/
Planning: Tools for Creating Vibrant, Healthy, city/2011/11/vintage_signage_in_toronto/
and Resilient Communities. Hoboken, N.J.:
Kake (2007). Retrieved from: www.flickr.com
Wiley.
Creative Commons.
Uebele, A. (2007). Signage Systems &
Kake (2007). Retrieved from: www.flickr.com
Information Graphics : A Professional
Creative Commons.
Sourcebook. London: Thames & Hudson.
La Tercera (2011). Agenciauno. Retrieved from:
Wheeler, A. (2009). Designing Brand Identity
http://papeldigital.info/lt/?2011101401#
: A Complete Guide to Creating, Building and
Maintaining Strong Brands. Hoboken, N.J.: Luigi Rosa (2012). Retrieved from: www.flickr.
John Wiley. com Creative Commons.
New Yorker Magazine (1976). View of the

world from 9th avenue. Retrieved from: http://
Photos en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Steinberg_New_
Adamjackson1984 (2009). Retrieved from: Yorker_Cover.png
www.flickr.com Creative Commons.
Rebrand (2008). Metro Los Angeles. Retrieved
Alain Bachellier (2013). Retrieved from: www. from: http://www.rebrand.com/2008-best-
flickr.com Creative Commons. metro-los-angeles
Alex Proimos (2011) . Retrieved from: www. Robyn Lee (2006). Retrieved from: www.flickr.
flickr.com Creative Commons. com Creative Commons.
Alexander Ly (2013). New Flyer XN40 PNG. Roxbury Community College Library
Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/ (2011). Olympic Village, Mexico D.F.
alexanderbusdrawings2/other-buses Retrieved from: http://www.flickr.com/
Architect Weekly (2012). Why was the photos/rcclibrary/6303798607/in/set-
Bauhaus Style so Important? Retrieved from: 72157627907026219
http://www.architectweekly.com/2012/12/ WikiCommons (2008). Jean-Pierre Dalbera.
why-was-bauhaus-style-so-important.html#. Retrieved from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Uo2052TXQxA
83
References
File:Hector_Guimard_Edicule_porte_Dauphine.
jpg
Wyliepoon (2014) . Retrieved from: www.flickr.

com Creative Commons.

Transit Signage System Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Transit Signage System Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Transit Signage System Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of signage and branding for public transit?

What is the purpose of signage and branding for public transit?

What are some examples of successful public transit signage systems discussed in the document?

What are some examples of successful public transit signage systems discussed in the document?

Transit Signage System Design

Theory & Practice

To Derek Kim for the mentorship along the way.

To Umut Toker for teaching me that design

To the City and Regional Planning Department

When signage system design and branding are

2.1 Signage Overview transit signage. Stations became more and

materials readily available on a broader market. influenced signage. Internationally, Bauhaus, a

However, transit agencies with well-designed

3.2 Signage System Design A transit signage system is developed using

Signage system design in

of transportation systems found in metropolitan Different users navigate environments in

The Benefits of Branding Transit

EMBARQ makes a point to say that marketing

The Benefits of Branding Transit

Branding Public Transit

5.1 Branding to choose its service, to reassure the user of

While the process seems straightforward, Start Tools to build a good

Branding Public Transit

Vignelli’s first transit

Transit Signage Design Process

6.4 Planning surrounding context (Gibson, 2009). These are

At this point, the wayfinding and signage 6.6 Design

Transit Signage Design Process

While it may seem costly at first to prototype,

The site map will most likely go through several

Paris transit maps

Transport for London’s

Precedent I: Paris Metro in his designs, which was first instance of

Precedent II: London Underground Between 1870-1890, signage and advertising

In the early 1900s, the London Subway had Bottom: Transport

By the mid 1900s, trials and errors lead to many

The Underground began planning the signage

In 1989 another manual-- the Sign Manual,

In 1994, the MTA received a new logo to

The signs of New York transit continue

Transport for London’s

Lessons Learned & Best Practices

A signage system and the environmental design

A signage system should be identifiable,

A transit mode and its signage system should

A transit agency should have the institutional

Each vehicle, stop, and station communicates Unlike London,

In addition to the general transit system,

3.1 Strategy more credibility to the information collected

3.2.b Behavior Mapping

Both northbound and southbound stops were

The most significant trend with the peak period

Only two groups of Muni riders, totaling 7

Digital route maps that Printed line maps that show

Please prioritize the usefulness of each map from most (1) to

Route line map with City walking map with stop

Muni uses the Univers font family. Univers is a

5.2.a Flag Sign

In the example flag signs, two font families