It Consumerization Actual

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

SCIREA Journal of Information Science

and Systems Science

http://www.scirea.org/journal/ISSS

September 25, 2020

Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2020

IT Consumerization Actual Use: Conceptual Model


Development

Lorraine Lamb1, Pamila Dembla2


DXC Technology, Atlanta, USA
1

Information Systems, Kennesaw State University, Atlanta, USA


2

*Corresponding Author: pdembla@kennesaw.edu (Lorraine Lamb)

Abstract

At a time when technology “As a Service” is common place for delivering information system
solutions and in particular workplace mobility services, IT Consumerization has become a staple
within the large enterprise workplace services portfolio. Having a conceptual design to extend
and grow our knowledge about the phenomenon is a critical prerequisite for both academic and
business persons alike. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First and in a very broad sense, this
paper provides new researchers with mindfulness toward applying existing historical theory
within their own research discipline toward their phenomenon of interest, and thereby fine-tune
the conceptual model to the current challenges apropos for today’s industry and academic fields.
Secondly, this paper takes a deeper dive into the phenomenon of actual use of IT
Consumerization services in today’s business world providing steps to practitioners who are
seeking to enable change and learning in a corporate setting through the use of mobility
workplace services. The following conceptual model integrates one of the theoretical frameworks

23
instinctive to the information system stream of research where actual use behaviors are at the
forefront. In having a quality conceptual model, we as researchers will then find ourselves in a
position to grow a sound foundation for future research.

Keywords: IT Consumerization, Actual Use, Theory of Planned Action, Mobility, Workplace


Services

1. Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual model for assessing influences upon the
intention to use and the actual use of a mobile workplace application. Information Technology
Consumerization (ITC) is a technology solution which focuses upon the mobile workplace and
mobile application services. ITC is not an uncommon mobility solution for large enterprises
across the globe. This service is offered by employers to their employees allowing personal
devices (privately-owned hardware) access into their workplace applications. The question is:
How often or with what regularity is this mobility service actually used by the employee? For
organizations and other business groups, gaining subscribership is critical for the realization of a
return on the investment (ROI) from the actual costs associated with deployment. Companies
must evaluate the total cost of ownership and then decide if it is the right strategy for their IT
Services model. Once a decision is made, the risk is whether or not employees will adopt and
how will the employer keep them using the service. In the workplace, it may be an organizational
culture shift to gain full adoption of any technology solution. The shift may appear to be a bigger
leap for an older work force (Baby Boomers and older Gen-Xers) than for their younger
colleagues (Millennials). To assess employee’s actual use perceptions of IT Consumerization in
the workplace, a research model was developed to evaluate the conditions. A predictive model
examines the proposed drivers of actual use of ITC in the workplace and ultimately provides
guidance on tactical positioning of these drivers to increase subscribership. Both practitioners and
academics can gain further awareness about the perceptual influences impacting actual use
behaviors from the model. For the practitioner, understanding these early influences may lead to
greater understanding about the sale and delivery cycles associated with the product, as well as

24
further understanding into the optimization of use. As academics, the outcome of model testing
will broaden our thinking about the intentions to use and perceptions that influence actual use.

For academics and researchers, the Theory of Planned Behavior is often seen as a starting point
for conceptual model development, especially for those studies which examine intentions to use.
The proposed model focuses upon understanding the influences which derive from the
individual’s perceptions leading to their intentions to use and actual use. For large enterprises,
ITC services in the workplace are typically implemented as part of the workplace mobility
services portfolio; however, the potential opportunities for a broader range of companies to offer
the service will most likely increase over time. Unlike previous studies, which have targeted
students, university personnel, and other learning institution employees, the proposed research
model targets a large enterprise workforce within the technology industry. The ITC model
incorporates a single dependent variable representing actual use and is connected to survey
responses related to confirmed usefulness, hardware selection, and application identification.
The conceptual model was developed in an effort to expand the existing ITC research stream by
positioning three new independent variables which are proposed to impact an individual’s
intentions leading to actual use: Personal Innovativeness toward Information Technology (PIIT),
Service Quality Empathy (EMPT), and Service Quality Responsiveness (RESP). Future research
opportunities are presented at the close of the paper.

2. Prior Research
Today, many corporations are finding that technology solutions are being delivered as a service
[13]. Service as a solution is demonstrated by the technology industry by easily provisioning
various cloud solutions for potential customers across the globe. The use of mobility and other
workplace tools is considered to be “software as a service” solution and helps business leaders to
guide their employees into becoming more effective and efficient with their work role tasks. As
with most computing technology solutions, the ubiquitous nature and dynamic rate of change
often drives these solutions to become more affordable for smaller businesses looking for the
same improvements in effectiveness and efficiency [35].

25
2.1 ITC and the “As a Service (AaS)” Evolution

Similar phenomena in the Information System (IS) research steam include the development and
use of remote access tools such as the UWYT (Use What You’re Told) remote access strategy.
The employer identifies specific personal hardware that an employee can use in the workplace to
access specific applications [37]. The research stream on remote access strategy also includes
BYOT (Bring Your Own Technology) and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). The BYOD
strategy is the consolidation of personal and corporate productivity tools that leverage Wireless-
enabled Authentication Protocol (WAP) on a single platform and is used for completing
enterprise application tasks [29]. Finally, Information Technology Consumerization (ITC) is the
use of employee-purchased devices as an entry point into the employer application portal either
remotely or at an employer’s facility [22], [29], [33].

Consider the historical footprint associated with the need for remote access as the progeny for a
variety of technology solutions and then introduce the quest for mobility everything for all
consumers everywhere. Overtime, we have seen the development of technology solutions which
can be provided as a service versus having the physical equipment and software licenses owned
by the employer. The ITC strategy allows the employee’s personal device to reach the services-
style, cloud-based solutions.

Some of the service-style, cloud based solutions include platforms as a services (PaaS) and
software as a service (SaaS). This approach puts the cloud maintenance, hardware, and licensing
in the hands of the provider. It allows faster availability of computer platforms and the allocation
of space, all of which can be priced as on-demand or as capacity used by the target consumer.
Companies only pay for the services required and not the warranty and maintenance associated
with total cost of ownership of the physical capital. Business organizations can apply the same
logic toward the employee’s mobile devices that are wired to access these services. The
employer that provides the ITC option, where the company does not own the mobile hardware
realizes the savings associated with hardware costs similarly as with a cloud-based solution by
reducing the total cost of ownership associated with the physical hardware/software from where
the services are accessed.

Technology companies continue to promote the anytime and anywhere delivery of information
system to the potential business customer as part of the Mobility Workplace services solutions.

26
Of course, select employees may still be issued a physical laptop having access to the tools
associated to their work-role while still making smart phone technology optional for other work
roles. Understanding how the “As a Service” is associated with ITC gives us a better
understanding of how the use of ITC truly remains a voluntary solution for many potential
subscribers.

As discussed previously, the potential outcome for any organization which offers the ITC service
solution and the ability to sustain subscribership stemming from actual use is then to begin the
cycle of eliminating a portion of hardware-related procurement costs. But deploying new
solutions and embracing change by the employees who make up the organization must also be
considered. If an organization can assure corporate security, manage risks, and provide
opportunities for employees to perform additional tasks beyond the standard eight-hour work day,
the service remains a sound investment. The organizational culture may see this as an acceptable
norm as well as an opportunity to use the personal device to perform responsibilities as part of its
standard work day. But the individuals that are employed by the organization must embrace the
change. Gaining enough confidence between employer and employees, thus making them
willing to try using IT Consumerization as a workplace service is the first step. When actual use
behaviors drive the formation of the habit of use, then the habit of many can set the workplace
norm for future employees to use the solution. Companies including Hewlett Packard, Dell, Iron
Mountain, IBM, and AT&T have already provisioned IT Consumerization as a service available
to their employees [5]. It is from this perspective, along with the Theory of Planned Behavior that
the proposed research model is conceptualized.

2.2 A Conceptual Model for ITC Actual Us

The conceptual model is developed by first targeting the theoretical framework of the Theory of
Planned Behavior (TPB). This theory calls out specific attributes that influence an individual’s
intentions and ultimately the performance of actual behaviors. [4] noted that TPB is a good
match for studies that include a social behavioral construct. Due to the permanence of social
networking, which is both a virtual and physical human habit, it seems appropriate for social
norms to be included in this research project which focuses upon use behaviors and mobile
devices. Another well-grounded theory which was considered was the Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM). TAM was not selected as the theoretical underpinning for two reasons. As stated,

27
social norm influences were of interest for this research design and TAM does not support the
social norm element. Additionally, actual use was another critical design element, and as
discovered, previous studies seem to turn more toward TPB if actual use was being assessed.
Although TPB and TAM are in agreement regarding the assessment of ease of use and its
relationship to technology acceptance, some system researchers have discovered that TAM
constructs do not always predict actual use behavior ([24], [36].

[26] completed a comparative study on predicting user intentions between TPB and TAM. He
determined that TAM was easier to apply than TPB. Furthermore, he provided the observation
that TPB is better for identifying the complexity of the intention to use and actual use behaviors
[26]. Further academic understanding is gained about technology use behaviors by first
distinguishing how people decide to use and then by determining the act whereby their thoughts
are framed into behavioral intentions to use. For the researchers of ITC, fully understanding the
actual use behavior requires knowing the details necessary to identify both beliefs (thinking) and
attitudes (feelings) which influence the users’ original decision to use the available technology
service [5],[41], [26], [27]. An examination of these phases of the thought process should
provide additional insight into understanding the complexity of usage and continued usage. The
idea of understanding the intricacy of human intentions and the drive to understand actual use
behaviors allows the proposed theoretical ideas to evolve into a more complex conceptual model

The conceptual model offers a framework that reflects the idea that perceptions of IT support,
personal interest in IT innovation, and application preference, along with other points of interest
may improve subscribership to the services. For this study, not only were the employees’
positive and negative beliefs examined, but also the influences from co-workers and a sense of
voluntariness to use was considered. All are proposed to be potential influencers upon the
employee’s attitudinal and behavioral intentions. The collection of these variables is based upon
the existing IS literature, along with well-grounded, behavioral research.

28
Figure 1. ITC Conceptual Model of Actual Use

The research theoretical propositions displayed in Figure 1 are important extensions of the
existing research stream [22],,[29], [33].

3. From Conceptual to Operational Model

The constructs that are to be assessed as they have been expanded in the conceptualization of
actual use include perceptions of positive and negative beliefs, attitudes, social norms, and
perceived behavioral control based upon the theoretical model. They must be operationalized as
to be used in a future research studies. These same constructs are then used to move from the
research questions into the conceptual model and forward on to operational model development.

3.1 Positive and Negative Beliefs

Beliefs are identified as thoughts about potentialities of an object [3],[4]. Belief-focused research
has been a prominent variable in behavioral research, especially that which examines the
influences affecting our attitudes and our intention to use a product or service. Positive and
negative beliefs can be any perception which leads to ideas of advantages or disadvantages
achieved through actual use. The use of the IT Consumerization service research has uncovered
similar relationships with perceptions of intention.

Some of the potential advantages uncovered in mobility services research include accessibility to
services, reduction in wait and travel time, and most often convenience [30], [14], [18]. IT
Consumerization research has found that employees have identified performance improvements
as a perceived expectation leading to an intention to use an IT Consumerization service in the

29
workplace [21], Loose, et al., 2013; [32]. A potential disadvantage evident in the mobility
services research stream pertains to privacy-related concerns, especially in the use of e-commerce
and banking transactions via wireless communications [23], [40], [42]. Recent research in the
area of IT Consumerization in the workplace has revealed similar concerns which relate to
privacy and security. The belief perceptions often generate feelings which are attitudinal in
nature and can also influence our intention toward use. The following propositions are considered
to be appropriate for examining the relationships presented in the model.

P1a: Privacy and security concerns about personal information loss or misuse will negatively
influence an employee’s attitude toward behavioral intentions to use IT Consumerization service
in the workplace.

P1b: Perceived performance improvements will have a positive influence on the user’s attitude
intention toward the behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in his/her workplace.

3.2 Attitude and Personal Interest

Different from the individual’s beliefs, which are about the assumed potential of an object,
attitudes are about the feelings we may have toward an object. Based upon previous consumer-
based research, positive attitudes toward an object create a positive feeling about the use of the
product [30]. If the object is considered to be a new and innovative product, and individuals are
considering use, their own personal interest in innovations may enhance the positive feeling or
positive attitude necessary to consider use. Some researchers discovered that highly innovative
individuals who were exposed to various technological innovations began to use with some
immediacy. Consequently, they set the pace to the broader consumer stream through the
adoption of new users to the technology offering [6]. Those individuals who exhibited personal
innovative traits were known as early adopters [1].

Personal innovativeness toward information technology could be described as the “excitement of


trying something new”. For my research, trying something “new” means to use a personal or
private wireless device to access corporate applications in order to complete work-related tasks.
More specific descriptions and sophisticated research already exists with regard to personal
innovative characteristics and behaviors. The development of the PIIT (Personal Innovativeness
in IT) construct was originally established in an effort to identify the traits of early adopters of
technology [1]. In their study, they proposed a moderating effect upon technology acceptance.

30
However, other consumer research found support for personal innovativeness as a partial
predictor of user attitude leading to the intention to use mobility services [17]. My study
examines early adopters within an organization of potential adopters who may have either an
intention or both an intention and demonstrated actual use behavior.

P2: Personal Innovativeness moderates the relationship between the attitude towards the intention
to use the service and the behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in the employee’s
workplace.

3.3 Social Normative

IT Consumerization research has considered the idea that social influences may affect an
individual’s decision to use the service. Social normative behaviors are presented within this
stream of research as coming from co-workers, supervisors, and managers who may influence the
employee’s attitude toward behavioral intention to use [10], Loose et al., 2013; [33]. My
research is an extension of these foundational studies and is intended to examine the influence of
the social norm on those individuals who were found to be actual users versus those individuals
who only considered use but were not actually using the service. An employee’s perception of a
coworker’s experience may be a driver for considering the use of the IT Consumerization service
on his/her personal device. On the other hand, the social normative may also influence non-users
differently than for those who are already users of the ITC service. Hence we propose:

P3: Co-workers who use IT Consumerization in the workplace will positively impact an
employee’s behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in the workplace.

3.4 Service Quality

IT Consumerization research has revealed factors that appears to be representative of service


quality and which have indicators of explanatory power directed towards the behavioral intention
to use research stream. [33] identified beliefs regarding technical support (usage and installation)
attributes that do affect intention to use. However, in order to understand how service quality has
been blended into IS research; we should consider consumer and marketing research on the topic
as well. In early consumer research, the most widely used model for assessing service quality
was developed by [34]. Their model provides the researcher with a method for evaluating service
quality by examining the gap between the consumer’s expectations and the perceptions of service
performance for IT Consumerization [19].
31
These ideas are assimilated into what an employee might perceive of her/his own IT Department
supporting the IT Consumerization service. An employee’s expectations of the IT Department
may influence the attitudinal intention; the attitude toward use may be different for actual users of
the service versus non-users who only considered use but were not actual users. Again, we
propose:

P4a: An employee who perceives high levels of empathy from the IT Department will have a
strong employee behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in the workplace.

P4b: An employee who perceives high levels of responsiveness from the IT Department will have
a strong employee behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in the workplace.

3.5 Voluntariness

Also found in consumer-based technology use research is the concept of voluntariness. For
example, mobility services which are system services or related mobile applications, these are
available to wireless devices and they promote consumer convenience and are considered
voluntary solutions. Tasks which could be completed by alternate means have the convenience of
the mobile application as an alternative, and if used are done so on a voluntary basis. The mobile
service provides voluntary applications and graphical user interfaces for such services as
commerce, banking, and other related transactional services. Mobility Services also provide an
alternate, voluntary link between the consumer and supplier in support of the consumer/supplier
relationship [18], [30], [40]. Consumers may choose to use these services via their personal
devices, or they may make alternative arrangements for engaging and/or completing an
applicable transaction with the supplier.

This idea is interesting from the perspective that our private devices may also become work-task
devices too. An expansion of the use of the device to include any added service may result in
continued use, which may be further realized as the technology becomes a dual use appliance
[15]. Employees may choose to use the IT Consumerization service provided by their employer;
tasks that could be completed via an alternate means would be perceived as voluntary.
Understanding how the perceptions of voluntary influence actual users of the service may impact
an individual’s intention toward use differently than those of the non-user group; therefore
leading us to propose:

32
P4c: Perceived voluntariness will have a positive influence on the employee’s behavioral
intention to use IT Consumerization in his/her workplace.

3.6 Intentions toward Use and Actual Use

Intentions toward use are central to the Theory of Planned Behavior and are derived from well-
developed cognitive research studies of the many predecessors and successors. In the field of IS
research, interest continues to grow in the direction that with the intention to use comes the
examination of actual use. Researchers have examined deep use and complex usage from a
system user’s perspective [8], [20], [25], [31]. These researchers have examined either deep
usage, in which case a multi-level system of use occurs within an organization or complex use,
which occurs at the individual level within the system itself. Researchers who apply the
structural perspective of organizational use advocate that use studies are best designed with all
three areas combined. These areas include individuals, groups, and organizations with each
area’s perceptions being assessed in an effort to understand technology use success [7]. The
complexity of individual use and deep usage assessments are also seen in studies which examine
post-adoption behaviors, an example of which includes studies focusing upon extended use, the
use of multiple features, and motivational factors that influence continued use behaviors [2], [9],
[16]. My operational model is finalized with the actual use dependent variable for the user group
of the IT Consumerization services study. Therefore we propose:

P5: The more favorable the attitude intentions toward IT Consumerization use in the workplace,
the higher degree of behavioral intention to use.

P6: Behavioral intention to use IT Consumerization in the workplace leads to confirmed usage.

The propositions into actual use research by moving beyond the familiar elements often
examined as indicators for an intention to use lead to the hypotheses as reflected in the figure
below as the operational model for this study.

33
Figure 2. ITC Actual Use Operational Model

The following sections provide a definition of the ITC service and workplace use. Along with the
description of the theoretical underpinnings, the conceptual background for each individual
variable is discussed in detail. Finally, model validation evaluation results are presented including
relevant statistical interpretations leading to future research opportunities.

4. Discussion
The potential for future academic research is an outgrowth of the present study and includes
focusing upon three areas of expansion. First, because the ITC conceptual model is unique in
that it has both intention to use and actual use, it promotes and develops a mechanism to further
understand the motivation associated with the adoption of IT Consumerization services in the
work place. Second, it is a model that can be leveraged for future field studies which address
heterogeneity within a population where actual use is not always a continued behavior even when
intentions to use seem relatively similar for both the potential users and actual users. Finally
from the practitioner’s perspective, by having a better understanding of the conditions in which
the behavioral intentions lead to actual use, will ultimately help both the sales and delivery
organizations of such service. Improved understanding within these teams in turn promote the
34
conditions that lead to actual use and reduce the conditions that retract from subscribership.
Based upon the presented model, closer consideration should be paid to the interpretation of
organizational service quality necessary to support the service and the possibility of an
individual’s personal innovativeness toward IT whenever deploying voluntary services such as
ITC. The three highpoints from the evaluation study are the consideration that intentions are not
enough, the inclusion of a deeper dive into heterogeneous conditions, and the careful examination
of the proposed variable which promotes or diminishes application subscribership.

The idea that actual use as a means of developing a full understanding of the phenomenon, one
must first consider that intentions to use is a mainstay from many theoretical behavioral models.
Today, there is competition for technology use. It includes both tool and system performance but
also that which makes the employees themselves more productive. It is no secret that
effectiveness and efficiency can result in organizational savings. However improvement in
efficiency is not difficult to measure when capital expenses are simply eliminated. The
elimination of capital expense and the simultaneous employee behavioral change may be in
tandem events and merely understanding the intentions alone is not enough. Further research into
just the intention to use measures may not lead to Actual Use. Therefore, if the initial perceptions
of change are not properly promoted within the delivery of the solution then nothing will be
gained for practitioners or academics.

The evaluation study suggested the idea of considering heterogeneity of the target audience and
promoted the plan for future use of more rigorous statistical methods for the deep dive into
heterogeneity of a larger sample field study. Examining a target audience on same exogenous
and endogenous variables leading to actual use may influence further research. Understanding
perceptional differences between those individuals with only intentions to use versus actual users
may also be different with regards to personal interests toward innovation or the expectation of
technology support service. This may lead to more complex assessments into the phenomenon of
the theoretical framework itself.

Additionally, for those variables that promote or diminish service subscribership as a means to
develop the framework in which any service is implemented for employee use, it is advised to
consider conditions which examine the beliefs and attitude driving human intention toward use.

35
Both attitude (feelings) and beliefs (potentials) about an innovation can aid the researcher into a
richer understanding of complex individual decision making processes.

Another consideration for researchers who examine service quality perception within the
Business to Employee (B2E) environment is that the driver of intentions to use may lead to a
demonstration of actual use and may be influenced by the perceptions of what is voluntary. Large
Enterprise (LE) voluntariness may be perceived differently than other populations, i.e., student
user sample, simply based upon expectation of personal device use and constraints deemed
necessary by corporate security policies.

Much of the previous research associated to remote access strategy is based upon the responses
from university sample sets. The usefulness of my model framework targets the Large Enterprise
(LE) experience and primes the academic research work stream to posture results that can be used
by practitioners as well. Furthermore, for results that may actually be more applicable to the SMB
(Small to Medium sized Business) environment, the Large Enterprise model and resulting
research may be more applicable than those provided by student-based populations. Future
research initiatives would be to use the presented model with a larger audience within the Large
Enterprise domain or to examine the difference between the perception of LE and SMB
employees.

The next step for further examination of the conceptual model is to apply the research design to a
larger audience who had been given an opportunity to use the ITC service. With a larger sample,
more data would 1) enhance the rigor of the model’s evaluation methodology and 2) advance the
quality of the data analysis and thus improve the interpretation of the results. By comparing
similar populations (type of work stream and demographic) and examining both employee
intention and actual use of the ITC services for the two business groups (LE versus SMB)
difference may be discovered on what leads to actual use for each target audience. Through the
examination of the results associated with my conceptual model and lessons learned, the study
could be more appropriately applied from the LE experience to the SMB employee. These
potential differences guide the practitioner who delivers technology services to follow a
framework that best fits the target audience.

Of course, it is useful to have a greater understanding of demographic influences upon employee


intention and actual use of an enterprise technology innovation within the workplace. With the

36
average employee age widening and the retirement age for full-benefits increasing, the older (and
wiser) corporate professional is staying in the workforce longer. Both age and/or years of
experience within any selected industry may influence the intention to use and actual use of
workplace mobility tools. Second, future consideration might be given to companies outside of
technology-based organizations, and specifically to teams which support business administration,
sales, project management or financial practices in industries such as healthcare and government
services.

An employee’s perceptions of technology and their self-perceived innovativeness toward


technology may be different for those individuals who have a work role directly within the
technology industry versus when corporate technology experiences may be diluted by
organization size and/or function. An aging workforce may perceive technology use differently
than that comprised of a younger generation, and may have a different expectation of the tools
and services provided by the employer. The evaluation study included respondents who were
mature in age and in their years of experience. More research is needed to determine the effects
of an aging workforce where technologies are emerging quickly and growing in complexity.
Understanding more about personality perceptions, i.e., personal innovativeness, might offer
additional insights into initial use and actual use behaviors.

For practitioners, those delivering technology solutions to their customers and those receiving
mobility workplace services such as IT Consumerization may have different perceptions of
usefulness, both positive and negative. The potential difference in perception can be contained
within one company where unique organizations exist across a large enterprise. The technology
recipients are users of technology and information systems who promote internal process
improvements and therefore deliver the disruptive innovation for a company-specific service.
Disruptive innovation meaning technology change halting current practices and improves the
workflow going forward. These new technology approaches improve sales, customer
relationships, and of course effectiveness and efficiency of the users. A technology industry
which develops IT/IS solutions and services which potentially fit into the recipient industry
disruptive process model are again leveraged as the stepping stone for the recipient’s company-
specific innovation. The ITC Consumerization service may be viewed differently by the
employees of these two unique industrial organizations.

37
Due to challenges for the academic researcher to establish and actually maintain a corporate
workforce relationships with a large enterprise, today’s research stream has often been limited to
students and other university faculty. Because of this condition, most attempts at gaining access
to employee-based data can be expensive with the researcher being overwhelmed by security
concerns associated with the data collection process. Finding business contacts is not always
possible and having a corporate-based data set which represents responses and perceptions
associated with the newer phenomenon is neither readily available nor accessible in a timely
fashion. This evaluation study is fortunate to have the proper sponsorship and corporate
enterprise contacts to gain qualitative data survey feedback, as well as evaluation data collection
on the survey tool.

5. Conclusion

The overall conditions observed during the assessment of evaluation data provided insights about
how to fine-tune the future field data questions for improved quality. Observations from the
evaluation data correlation assessment are early warning signals of potentially similar conditions
between and within the model’s constructs. The lessons learned from the evaluation study are
now captured for improving the field study design. In conclusion, the pre-assessment results
guided the researcher to fine-tune the definitions of the constructs, and the evaluation study data
helped the researcher to improve the quality of the overall survey design.

References

[1] Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal
innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems
Research, 9(2), 204-215.

[2] Ahuja, M. K., & Thatcher, J. B. (2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of
trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology
use. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(3), 427-459.

38
[3] Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer Berlin
Heidelber.

[4] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human
decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

[5] Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, 8(4).

[6] Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1990). The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing
innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Information Systems
Research, 1(2), 115-143.

[7] Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage
in organizations: a multilevel perspective. Management Information Systems
Quarterly, 31(4), 657-679.

[8] Burton-Jones, A., & Straub Jr, D. W. (2006). Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach
and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228-246.

[9] Choi, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2011). Driving factors of post adoption behavior in mobile
data services. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1212-1217.

[10]Dernbecher, S., Beck, R., & Weber, S. (2013). Switch to your own to work with the known:
An empirical study on consumerization of IT. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas
Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois.

[11]Ellis, L., Saret, J., & Weed, P. (2012). BYOD: From company-issued to employee owned
devices. McKinsey and Company: Telecommunications, Media, and Technology Practice,
No. 20.

[12]Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-


level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business
Research, 55(2), 163-176.

[13]Giessmann, A., & Stanoevska-Slabeva, K. (2012). Business models of platform as a service


(PaaS) providers: current state and future directions. Journal of Information Technology
Theory and Application, 13(4), 31.

39
[14]Harris, M., Patten, K., Regan, E., & Fjermestad, J. (2012). Mobile and connected device
security considerations: A dilemma for small and medium enterprise business mobility?
Proceedings of the Eighteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle,
Washington.

[15]Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information
appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information systems research, 17(2), 162-179.

[16]Hsieh, J.J., & Wang, W., (2007). Explaining employees’ extended use of complex
information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 216–227.

[17]Hung, S. Y., Ku, C. Y., & Chang, C. M. (2003). Critical factors of WAP services adoption:
an empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(1), 42-60.

[18]Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & de Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless
finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(3), 206-217.

[19]Kohlmeyer III, J. M., & Blanton, J. E. (2000). Improving IS service quality. Journal of
Information Technology Theory and Application, 2(1), 3.

[20]Lamb, R., & Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information
systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(2) 197-236.

[21]Lebek, B., Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2013). Investigating the Influence of Security,
Privacy, and Legal Concerns on Employees' Intention to Use BYOD Mobile Devices, in
Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago.

[22]Loose, M., Weeger, A., & Gewald, H. (2013). BYOD –the next big thing in recruiting?
Examining the determinants of BYOD service adoption behavior from the perspective of
future employees, in Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems,
Chicago.

[23]Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use
mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873-891.

[24]Manfredo, M. J., & Shelby, B. (1988). The effect of using self-report measures in tests of
attitude—behavior relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(6), 731-743.

40
[25]Marcolin, B. L., Compeau, D., Munro, M. C. and Huff, S. L. (2001) Assessing user
competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Information Systems Research, 11(1), 37–
60.

[26]Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance


model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.

[27]Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the


perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems
Research, 2(3), 192-222.

[28]Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions:
Implications for a changing work force. Personnel psychology, 53(2), 375-403.

[29]Niehaves, B., Koeffer, S., & Ortbach, K. (2012). IT consumerization–A theory and practice
review, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems,
Seattle, Washington.

[30]Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Berthon, P. (2005). Mobilizing the brand:
The effects of mobile services on brand relationships and main channel use. Journal of
Service Research, 7(3), 257-276.

[31]Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the
“IT” in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2),
121-134.

[32]Ortbach, K., Bode, M., & Niehaves, B. (2013a). What influences technological
individualization?–An analysis of antecedents to IT consumerization behavior, in
Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago.

[33]Ortbach, K., Köffer, S., Bode, M., & Niehaves, B. (2013b). Individualization of information
systems-analyzing antecedents of IT consumerization behavior, in Proceedings of the 34th
International Conference on Information Systems, Milan.

[34]Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1995). Moving forward in service quality
research: measuring different customer-expectation levels, comparing alternative scales, and
examining the performance-behavioral intentions link. Report-Marketing Science Institute
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 41-42.
41
[35]Pihlstom, Minna (2007) Committed to content provider or mobile channel? Determinants of
continuous mobile multimedia service use. Journal of Information Technology Theory and
Application, 9(1), 1-23.

[36]Sharma, R., Yetton, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). Re-Evaluating evidences from technology
acceptance model research: Estimating the effect of common method bias on the perceived
usefulness-use relationship. Diffusion of Innovations Group in Information Technology
(DIGIT/SIGADIT), Washington, DC.

[37]Singh, N. (2012). BYOD genie is out of the bottle–“Devil or angel”. Journal of Business
Management & Social Sciences Research, 1(3), 1-12.

[38]Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of
competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.

[39]Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems
research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and
Application, 11(2), 5-40.

[40]Wang, Y. S., Lin, H. H., & Luarn, P. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile
service. Information Systems Journal, 16(2), 157-179.

[41]Wu, P. F., (2012). A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. Journal
of the Association for Information Systems 13(3), 172-187.

[42]Wu, J., & Wang, S. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the
revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42, 719-729.

[43]Xu, J. D., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). Integrating service quality with system
and information quality: An empirical test in the e-service context. Management Information
Systems Quarterly, 37(3) 777-794.

42

You might also like