Crack Free PHC PDF
Crack Free PHC PDF
Crack Free PHC PDF
Materials Chemistry C
View Article Online
PAPER View Journal | View Issue
Published on 26 June 2017. Downloaded by Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur on 8/3/2020 11:42:33 AM.
The cracking and iridescence properties of photonic crystals (PCs) greatly limit their availability, especially
in the realms of color displays and optical devices. Herein, crack-free amorphous PCs with enhanced
color contrast and low angle dependence were fabricated by the co-assembly of polydopamine-coated
polystyrene core–shell nanoparticles (PS@PDA NPs) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) via a
thermal-assisted self-assembly method. The covalent bonds, generated from Schiff base reaction or
Michael addition between polydopamine (PDA) and APTES, successfully counteract the tensile stress that is
Received 10th April 2017, initiated from latex shrinkage during drying, thereby enabling the formation of crack-free PCs. Moreover,
Accepted 25th June 2017 thanks to the light-absorbing nature of PDA, a mussel-inspired melanin, and the amorphous arrays, these
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc01549f as-prepared crack-free PCs miraculously exhibit high visibility and low angle dependent structural colors.
This facile, low-cost and environmentally friendly approach for preparing crack-free amorphous PCs can
rsc.li/materials-c be employed in diverse colloidal sphere systems and may boost the promising applications of PCs.
8194 | J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
(APTES) monomers and polydopamine coated polystyrene Fabrication of crack-free amorphous PC films
nanoparticles (PS@PDA NPs), the APTES monomers containing A simple thermal-assisted self-assembly method was used to
amino groups can react with the benzoquinone structures of attain the crack-free amorphous PC films.34 Prior to use, the
polydopamine (PDA) effortlessly, where covalent bonds are glass slides (24 24 mm) were cleaned by ethanol in an
produced. As the solvent evaporates, APTES monomers will ultrasonic bath for 30 min and dried in a vacuum oven.
self-condense and cross-link, configuring a Si–O–Si network. In PS@PDA core–shell NPs were dispersed in deionized water at
the end, the interaction among PS@PDA NPs can be reinforced
Published on 26 June 2017. Downloaded by Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur on 8/3/2020 11:42:33 AM.
Experimental The surface morphologies of the PCs were imaged using a field
emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (Zeiss, LEO-
Materials 1530VP). Before observing, a thin layer of platinum gold was
Styrene (St), methacrylic acid (MAA) and ammonium persulfate sputtered on the film using a sputter coater (Quorum, Q150T ES).
(APS) were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagents. The size distributions of PS NPs were measured by dynamic light
Dopamine hydrochloride and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane scattering (Malvern, Zetasizer Nano-ZS ZEN3600). A transmission
(Tris) were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL, JEM-2100) was used to
Ltd. 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) was purchased from observe the morphology of PS@PDA NPs. Infrared spectra were
Aladdin Industrial Corporation. Deionized water (18.2 MO cm 1 measured by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy
resistivity) was used throughout the experiments. Styrene was (Bruker, TENSOR-27). The X-ray energy dispersive spectrum
purified by decompression distillation to remove polymerization (EDS) was recorded on an Oxford Inca-400 energy dispersive
inhibitors. All other reagents were used without any further spectrometer. Reflection spectra were obtained using an
purification. ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer (Hitachi, U-3010).
Photographs of the as-prepared PC films were taken using a
Synthesis of monodispersed polystyrene nanoparticles digital camera (Canon, 1300D).
Monodispersed polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles (NPs) were synthe-
sized via an emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization method
according to the literature.33 In brief, 100 mL of deionized water,
Results and discussion
an appropriate amount of St (4–10 g) and 1 g of MAA were added Homogeneously dispersed PS NPs with various diameters,
to a 250 mL four-necked round-bottomed flask accompanied 162 nm, 186 nm and 252 nm, respectively, were first synthe-
with a mechanical stirring rod, a thermometer and a coiled sized as the core particles through an emulsifier-free emulsion
condenser. When the mixture was heated to 75 1C under a polymerization method. SEM images and size distributions of
stirring rate of 300 rpm, 0.15 g of APS dissolved in 5 g of the three PS NPs are shown in Fig. S1 (ESI†), which illustrates
deionized water was quickly injected into the reactor. The whole that these colloid spheres have a good polydispersity index
experiment was sustained at 75 1C and kept in a nitrogen (PDI) of around 5%, which conforms to the demand of assem-
atmosphere. After 7 h of reaction, the PS latex was obtained. bling high quality photonic crystals.16 Next, benefited from the
Finally, the PS powder was collected by centrifugation and stored unique adhesion capability of PDA, PS@PDA core–shell NPs
in a dryer for the subsequent experiment. were fabricated by directly decorating a PDA shell-layer on the
surface of PS particles, where an in situ self-polymerization
Preparation of PS@PDA core–shell nanoparticles reaction of dopamine (DA) occurred under weakly alkaline
In a typical procedure, PS powder (0.1 g) was redistributed in the conditions (Scheme 1a). In particular, dopamine was primarily
Tris–HCl buffer (50 mL, 10 mM; pH = 8.5) and ultrasonicated for oxidized into the corresponding quinone compounds, which
30 min. Then, 50 mg of dopamine hydrochloride was directly could polymerize into oligomers via intra- or inter-molecular
immersed in the PS dispersion and maintained under mild cross-linking reaction, and then, PDA was attained after the
magnetic stirring for 20 h at ambient temperature. Lastly, the aggregation of oligomers.35,36 With the progress of the reaction,
PS@PDA core–shell NPs were fabricated. Following separation PDA polymerized in the suspension would continuously stick to
by centrifugation and rinsing with deionized water several times, the PS NP surface. The SEM and TEM images of PS@PDA NPs
the PS@PDA NPs were ready for the following co-assembly clearly indicate that the nanoparticles are greatly monodispersed
process. with an average size of 198 nm (Fig. 1a and b). Additionally, the
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 | 8195
View Article Online
8196 | J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Fig. 4 SEM images of the as-prepared PC films with diverse mass ratios of
APTES to PS@PDA NPs: (a) 0 : 5, (b) 0.5 : 5, (c) 1 : 5 and (d) 2 : 5; the scale bar
is 200 mm. Inset: The magnified images of PC films; the scale bar is
500 nm. The PS core size is 186 nm.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 | 8197
View Article Online
D/l p 1/n
Fig. 6 Reflectance spectra of PC films fabricated from PS NPs (blue curve), Fig. 7 (a) Photographs of crack-free PS@PDA/APTES hybrid PC films
PS@PDA NPs (green curve) and the PS@PDA/APTES hybrid (red curve); viewed from different viewing angles under ambient light; the diameters
the PS/PS core diameters are (a) 162 nm, (b) 186 nm, and (c) 252 nm. (d) The of PS cores are 162 nm (blue), 186 nm (green) and 252 nm (red); the mass
relationship between peak wavelengths (lmax) in reflection spectra and the ratio of APTES to PS@PDA NPs is 1 : 5. The scale bar is 2 cm. (b) Reflection
diameters of the PS/PS core; blue: PS NPs, green: PS@PDA NPs, red: spectra of the blue PC film at different incident angles. (c) Plots of peak
PS@PDA/APTES hybrid. wavelengths for the reflection spectra as a function of incident angle.
8198 | J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 | 8199
View Article Online
14 N. Segal, S. Keren-Zur, N. Hendler and T. Ellenbogen, Nat. 31 Z. Cai, J. Teng, D. Xia and X. S. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011,
Photonics, 2015, 9, 180–184. 115, 9970–9976.
15 I. Koirala, V. R. Shrestha, C. S. Park, S. S. Lee and D. Y. Choi, 32 H. Li, J. Theriault, B. Rousselle, B. Subramanian, J. Robichaud
Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 40073. and Y. Djaoued, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2184–2186.
16 X. Yang, D. Ge, G. Wu, Z. Liao and S. Yang, ACS Appl. Mater. 33 F. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhu and Y. Lin, RSC Adv., 2016, 6,
Interfaces, 2016, 8, 16289–16295. 37535–37543.
17 Z. Shen, L. Shi, B. You, L. Wu and D. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem., 34 F. Li, B. Tang, S. Wu and S. Zhang, Small, 2017, 13, 1602565.
Published on 26 June 2017. Downloaded by Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur on 8/3/2020 11:42:33 AM.
2012, 22, 8069. 35 Q. Yue, M. Wang, Z. Sun, C. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Deng and
18 F. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Lin, L. Wang and J. Zhu, ACS Appl. D. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 1, 6085.
Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 5009–5016. 36 Y. Liu, K. Ai and L. Lu, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 5057–5115.
19 G. von Freymann, V. Kitaev, B. V. Lotsch and G. A. Ozin, 37 A. Kawamura, M. Kohri, G. Morimoto, Y. Nannichi,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2528–2554. T. Taniguchi and K. Kishikawa, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 33984.
20 M. S. Tirumkudulu and W. B. Russel, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 38 D. B. Knorr, Jr., N. T. Tran, K. J. Gaskell, J. A. Orlicki,
4938–4948. J. C. Woicik, C. Jaye, D. A. Fischer and J. L. Lenhart,
21 J. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Huang, G. Liu, L. Wang, S. Chen, X. Li, Langmuir, 2016, 32, 4370–4381.
D. Wang, Y. Song and L. Jiang, NPG Asia Mater., 2012, 4, e21. 39 Z. Li, C. Wu, K. Zhao, B. Peng and Z. Deng, Colloids Surf., A,
22 M. Chen, Y. Tian, J. Zhang, R. Hong, L. Chen, S. Chen and 2015, 470, 80–91.
D. Y. Son, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 8765–8771. 40 M. Kohri, Y. Nannichi, H. Kohma, D. Abe, T. Kojima,
23 B.-J. Kim and K.-S. Kang, Cryst. Growth Des., 2012, 12, 4039–4042. T. Taniguchi and K. Kishikawa, Colloids Surf., A, 2014,
24 T. Kanai and T. Sawada, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 13315–13317. 449, 114–120.
25 Z. Zhang, W. Shen, C. Ye, Y. Luo, S. Li, M. Li, C. Xu and 41 Y. Cong, T. Xia, M. Zou, Z. Li, B. Peng, D. Guo and Z. Deng,
Y. Song, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 5300. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2, 3450.
26 L. Wang and X. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 8538–8542. 42 Y. Takeoka, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 23299.
27 B. Hatton, L. Mishchenko, S. Davis, K. H. Sandhage and 43 Y. Takeoka, S. Yoshioka, A. Takano, S. Arai, K. Nueangnoraj,
J. Aizenberg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2010, 107, H. Nishihara, M. Teshima, Y. Ohtsuka and T. Seki, Angew.
10354–10359. Chem., 2013, 52, 7261–7265.
28 X. D. Shi, W. Y. Liu, D. Zhao, X. T. Li, R. M. Dou, K. J. Shea 44 R. Hirashima, T. Seki, K. Katagiri, Y. Akuzawa, T. Torimoto
and X. H. Lu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 7208–7214. and Y. Takeoka, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 344–348.
29 Y. Huang, J. Zhou, B. Su, L. Shi, J. Wang, S. Chen, L. Wang, 45 M. Xiao, Y. Li, M. C. Allen, D. D. Deheyn, X. Yue, J. Zhao,
J. Zi, Y. Song and L. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, N. C. Gianneschi, M. D. Shawkey and A. Dhinojwala, ACS
17053–17058. Nano, 2015, 9, 5454–5460.
30 M. R. Kim, S. H. Im, Y.-S. Kim and K. Y. Cho, Adv. Funct. 46 C.-F. Lai, Y.-C. Wang and H.-C. Hsu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016,
Mater., 2013, 23, 5700–5705. 4, 398–406.
8200 | J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 8194--8200 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017