Tear Dysfunction and The Cornea: LXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture
Tear Dysfunction and The Cornea: LXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture
Tear Dysfunction and The Cornea: LXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture
STEPHEN C. PFLUGFELDER
● PURPOSE: To describe the cause and consequence of complex and highly regulated system to produce and
tear dysfunction–related corneal disease. distribute tears.
● DESIGN: Perspective on effects of tear dysfunction on Tear dysfunction is one of the most prevalent medical
the cornea. conditions, affecting tens of millions of patients worldwide.
● METHODS: Evidence is presented on the effects of tear Tear dysfunction is a more encompassing term than dry eye
dysfunction on corneal morphology, function, and for tear-associated disorders of the ocular surface and
health, as well as efficacy of therapies for tear dysfunc- cornea because it encompasses changes in tear composition
tion–related corneal disease. rather than tear volume.1 Tear dysfunction has long been
● RESULTS: Tear dysfunction is a prevalent eye disease recognized to cause corneal epithelial disease that can
and the most frequent cause for superficial corneal decrease visual performance and cause ocular irritation.
epithelial disease that results in corneal barrier disrup- Mechanisms responsible for these pathologic changes were
tion, an irregular optical surface, light scattering, optical poorly understood until evidence from recent clinical
aberrations, and exposure and sensitization of pain- studies and animal models indicated that altered tear
sensing nerve endings (nociceptors). Tear dysfunction– composition causes dysfunction, accelerated death, and
related corneal disease causes irritation and visual detachment of the superficial epithelium, leading to an
symptoms such as photophobia and blurred and fluctu- irregular corneal surface, an unstable tear layer, and hyper-
ating vision that may decrease quality of life. Dysfunc- esthesia of the corneal nerve endings. These changes in
tion of 1 or more components of the lacrimal functional the superficial cornea can significantly impact quality of
unit results in changes in tear composition, including life and productivity in patients suffering from tear dys-
elevated osmolarity and increased concentrations of ma- function. I provide here my perspective on the function of
trix metalloproteinases, inflammatory cytokines, and tears on maintaining corneal health, the impact of tear
chemokines. These tear compositional changes promote dysfunction on the cornea, and consequences of tear
disruption of tight junctions, alter differentiation, and dysfunction–related corneal disease on patient well-being
accelerate death of corneal epithelial cells. based on published evidence and research I have per-
● CONCLUSIONS: Corneal epithelial disease resulting formed over the past 25 years.
from tear dysfunction causes eye irritation and decreases
visual function. Clinical and basic research has improved
understanding of the pathogenesis of tear dysfunction– VISION STARTS AT THE TEAR LAYER
related corneal epithelial disease, as well as treatment
outcomes. (Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:900 –909. THE TEAR/CORNEAL EPITHELIAL COMPLEX IS THE MAJOR
© 2011 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) light-refracting surface of the eye, accounting for approx-
imately 65% of the optical power of the eye.2 A smooth
T
HE CORNEA IS A TRULY UNIQUE OPTICALLY CLEAR and stable tear layer is essential for maintaining high-
tissue, devoid of blood vessels, that relies on tears to quality vision between blinks. Ultrastructural, biochemi-
maintain a moist, smooth, and lubricated surface in cal, and functional studies show that the precorneal tear
the face of near-constant exposure to ambient environ- layer is a gel composed of soluble mucus secreted by the
mental conditions during waking hours. Additionally, the conjunctival goblet cells and fluid and proteins secreted by
tears provide myriad factors that protect the cornea from the lacrimal glands.3– 6 This hydrophilic gel moves over
microbial infection and the sight-threatening effects of the membrane mucins (glycocalyx) on the superficial
excessive inflammation or prolonged wound healing. To corneal epithelial cells and serves as a medium to refresh
maintain corneal clarity and quality vision, humans have a the tear components and clear debris. The precorneal tear
layer provides a smooth coating over the irregular micro-
plicae on apical corneal epithelia cells. The normal tear
Accepted for publication Aug 23, 2011. film remains stable for the entire interblink interval,
From the Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor although the precorneal layer has been observed by optical
College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Inquiries to Stephen C. Pflugfelder, Cullen Eye Institute, 6565 Fannin, coherence tomography (OCT) to gradually thin at a rate of
NC 205, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: stevenp@bcm.edu 4 m/minute because of evaporation and the pull of
cells.49,53 Furthermore, exposure to high osmolarity acti- that increase firing as the temperature decreases from 34 to
vates intrinsic apoptotic pathways in corneal epithelial 24 C have been shown to regulate basal tear flow by the
cells that can lead to accelerated turnover of the apical lacrimal gland.59 More rapid corneal cooling in eyes with
epithelium.54 Increased numbers of cornifying, dead, and tear dysfunction and accelerated tear break-up likely re-
detaching epithelial cells may be responsible for the sults in increased nerve firing that may be interpreted as
increased number of opaque corneal epithelial cells that eye discomfort.60,61 Studies evaluating corneal sensitivity
have been observed by confocal microscopy and metaplas- in dry eye have reported conflicting results of either
tic cells noted in conjunctival impression cytology of heightened or reduced sensitivity. Hyperesthesia has been
patients with tear dysfunction.55–57 observed in several studies using a gas esthesiometer,62,63
while studies testing mechanical sensitivity with a nylon
monofilament have generally found reduced sensitivity to
CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF TEAR this mechanical stimulus.64,65 The conflicting findings of
DYSFUNCTION ON THE SUPERFICIAL hyperesthesia or hypoesthesia in eyes with tear dysfunction
CORNEA may be attributed to the type of test stimulus applied
or corneal nerve degeneration that may develop in eyes
THE PRINCIPAL CLINICAL MANIFESTATION OF TEAR DYS-
with long-standing tear dysfunction, particularly Sjögren
function–related superficial corneal epithelial disease is eye
irritation. Typical symptoms consist of dryness, foreign syndrome.66,67
body sensation, and burning. Patients often complain of Many patients with corneal epitheliopathy complain of
exquisite sensitivity to wind or drafts from air conditioning photosensitivity that in some cases can be severe and
vents. While the mechanisms responsible for these irrita- disabling, forcing them to wear tinted glasses and avoid
tion symptoms are not fully understood, it appears they are bright lights. This symptom may be attributed in part to
attributable in large part to greater exposure of corneal light scattering from the irregular tear film and superficial
nociceptors to environmental stimuli, as well as sensitiza- corneal epithelium. Videokeratoscopic surface regularity
tion of these nerve endings by inflammatory mediators. indices have found greater surface irregularity in eyes with
Rosenthal and associates have proposed the term “corneal tear dysfunction that correlated with the severity of cor-
neuralgia” to describe the heightened corneal sensitivity neal fluorescein staining.68 Serial corneal topographic
associated with tear dysfunction.58 Transient receptor measurements taken of the open eye after a blink have
potential cation channel subfamily member 8 (TRPM8) observed a more rapid increase of corneal surface irregu-
ion channels in cold receptors in the corneal epithelium larity than eyes with normal tear function and the rate of
THE AUTHOR HAS COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED THE ICMJE FORM FOR DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND
indicates consulting fees from Allergan, Alcon, and GlaxoSmithKline, and honoraria from Allergan. Publication of this article was supported by National
Institute of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) grants EY11915 and RO1EY018090 to S.C.P.; and grants from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, New York),
The Oshman Foundation (Houston, Texas), The William Stamps Farish Fund (Houston, Texas), The Hamill Foundation (Houston, Texas), and Allergan, Inc
(Irvine, California). The author is responsible for writing and all aspects of preparation of this manuscript. This work would not have been possible without
the contributions of the author’s mentors and collaborators: Dan B. Jones, Edward W.D. Norton (posthumous), John Clarkson, Richard K. Parrish, Richard K.
Forster, William W. Culbertson, Sally Atherton, Michael E. Stern, Scheffer Tseng, De-Quan Li, Andrew J. Huang, and Cintia S. de Paiva.
Given the editorial perspective nature of this manuscript, there are no issues related to IRB approval; HIPAA compliance; Clinical Trials registration,
number, and location; or Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines.