Burma v. Kokine Dairy, Rangoon
Burma v. Kokine Dairy, Rangoon
Burma v. Kokine Dairy, Rangoon
(51) In Commissioner of Income-tax, Burma v. Kokine Dairy, Rangoon [1938-6 ITR 502,
509], the question was whether income from a dairy farm and the milk derived from the farm
is agricultural income and exempt as such from income-tax. Roberts C.J., who delivered the
opinion of the Court observed:
22
Where cattle are wholly stall-fed and not pastured upon the land at all, doubtless it is trade
and no agricultural operation is being carried on: where cattle are being exclusively or mainly
pastured and are nonetheless fed with small amounts of oil-cake or the like, it may well be
that the income derived from the sale of their milk is agricultural income. But between the
two extremes there must be a number of varying degrees, and the task of the Income-tax
Officer is to apply his mind to the two distinctions and to decide in any particular case on
which side of the fence, if I may use the term, the matter falls. (55) In Moolji Sicka & Co., In
re [1939-7 ITR 493 (Cal.)] Derbyshire C.J., understood the term ―agriculture‖ in a wider
sense as including operations not only on the land itself but on the shrubs which grew on the
soil and were according to him a part of the soil. The assessees were manufacturers of biri, a
kind of cigarette consisting of tobacco wrapped in tendu leaves. The tendu plant was of
entirely wild growth and propagated itself without human agency in jungle and waste lands.
The assessees had taken several villages on ―lease‖ for plucking the leaves of such plants
and the work done by the assessees consisted in pruning the trees and burning the dead
branches and dried leaves lying on the ground. The Court held that the profits accruing to the
assessees by the sale of tendu leaves was not exempt as agricultural income but to the extent
to which pruning of the tendu shrub occurred, there was in a technical and legal sense a
cultivation of the soil in which the shrub grew and therefore so much of the income as was
shown by the assessee to be profit derived from the collection and preparation, so as to take
them fit to be taken to the market, of tendu leaves produced by the pruning of the tendu
shrubs was exempt as agricultural income. (56) The word cultivation was here understood by
the learned Chief Justice not only in the sense of cultivation of the soil but in the sense of
cultivation of the tendu shrubs which grew on the soil and were therefore a part of it. The
operations which were performed on the shrubs were certainly not operations performed on
the soil itself and the opinion expressed by the learned Chief Justice has certainly given an
extended meaning to the term cultivation as used with reference to the soil. It is significant
however to observe that cultivation of the soil was considered an essential ingredient which
rendered the income derived from the tendu leaves agricultural income within the meaning of
its definition in S. 2(1)(a) of the Act. (57) 1950-18 ITR 259 at p. 271 contains a further
extension of this idea where Vishwanatha Sastri J., observed at p. 274:
Pasture land used for the feeding and rearing of livestock is land used for agricultural
purposes: ILR 25 Mad. 627 at pp. 629, 630. Rearing of livestock such as cows, buffaloes,
sheep and poultry is included in ―husbandry‖. These animals are considered to be the
products of the soil, just like crops, roots, flowers and trees, for they live on the land and
derive their sustenance from the soil and its produce: AIR 1938 Rang. 260 at p. 261)(FB). It
is therefore not legitimate in my opinion, to confine the word ―agriculture‖ to the cultivation
of an open field with annual or periodical crops like wheat, rice, ragi, cotton, tobacco, jute,
etc. Casuarina is usually