Forecasting System Imbalance Volumes in Competitive Electricity Markets
Forecasting System Imbalance Volumes in Competitive Electricity Markets
Forecasting System Imbalance Volumes in Competitive Electricity Markets
net/publication/3267508
CITATIONS READS
45 1,651
2 authors, including:
D.s. Kirschen
University of Washington Seattle
263 PUBLICATIONS 14,140 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
CPS: Synergy: Certifiable, Scalable, and Attack-resilient Submodular Control Framework for Smart Grid Stability View project
IEEE Cascading Failure Working Group Project ion Cascading View project
All content following this page was uploaded by D.s. Kirschen on 01 February 2016.
Abstract—Forecasting in power systems has been made consid- then highlighted. This paper also shows how exploratory anal-
erably more complex by the introduction of competitive electricity ysis can be used to describe the structure of the data series and
markets. Furthermore, new variables need to be predicted by var- determine the relationships between the different variables in-
ious market participants. This paper shows how a new method-
ology that combines classical and data mining techniques can be volved in the forecasting process. Results based on actual NETA
used to forecast the system imbalance volume, a key variable for market data demonstrate the accuracy that can be achieved.
the system operator in the market of England and Wales under the
New Electricity Trading Arrangements (NETA). II. FORECASTING IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS
Index Terms—Data mining, electricity markets, multidimen-
sional forecasting, neural networks, time series. Dash et al. [1], Bunn [2], Sfetsos [3], and Kermanshahi et
al. [4] provide overviews of the progress that has been made
recently in the broad field of forecasting in power systems. The
I. INTRODUCTION introduction of competitive electricity markets has consider-
ably increased not only the complexity of this task but also the
F ORECASTING in power systems used to deal mostly with
predicting future values of the load. With the introduction
of competitive electricity markets, forecasting has become not
breadth of this field.
• Forecasting is no longer an activity performed only by the
only a much larger but also a much more complex topic. While system operator. All market participants must do some
predicting future prices is obviously an important issue, it is not forecasting to maximize their profitability and control
the only question for which market participants seek answers. their exposure to risk.
Their commercial performance is also strongly affected by their • Load is no longer the only uncertain variable that must
ability to predict other variables such as the volumes that will be be forecasted. Market participants are interested in prices
traded in different segments of the market. Since in a competi- [5]–[10], traded volumes, and market length.
tive environment all participants have the freedom to operate in- • Market variables are much more “noisy” than the system
dependently, the overall level of uncertainty in the operation of load.
the power system increases, and the variables that might be rel- • The values of these variables are driven in complex ways
evant proliferate. Choosing among the dozens of variables that by many interacting factors. It is thus important to expand
are recorded in a typical market, those that are the best predic- previous one-dimensional approaches (see, for example,
tors of the quantity of interest becomes a major challenge. [6]) to multidimensional inputs.
This paper explores how data mining can be used to select the • The amount of data to be considered is huge and involves
most promising predictors and how new and traditional tech- not only the market clearing data but also the positions
niques can be combined to develop more accurate forecasting that the participants took for every market period and syn-
tools. It adopts the perspective of a system operator that must thetic indicators of market activity.
procure the energy needed to maintain the balance between gen- • Changes in market rules affect the way some variables are
eration and load. If system operators can accurately forecast the calculated and influence the behavior of market partici-
amount of balancing energy needed during each market period, pants. These changes reduce the amount of historical data
they can purchase this energy on the forward market rather than that can reliably be used for forecasting.
on the spot market. Such an approach usually helps minimize One could try to adapt to electricity markets the techniques
the balancing cost. In the New Electricity Trading Arrangement that are used for forecasting the behavior of other markets. Un-
(NETA), which is in effect in England and Wales, this key vari- fortunately, these techniques cannot easily be applied to elec-
able is called the net imbalance volume (NIV). tricity because it significantly differs from other physical com-
Traditional time series forecasting methods are first compared modities, such as corn or oil, and financial instruments, such as
with neural networks techniques. The advantages of multi- stocks and bonds. Furthermore, the rules and characteristics of
dimensional forecasting over one-dimensional approaches are electricity markets are quite different from those of these other
markets [11].
Manuscript received December 20, 2004; revised July 6, 2005. This work was
supported in part by the National Grid Transco and in part by Statsoft. Paper no.
III. NETA AND THE NIV
TPWRS-00661-2004.
The authors are with the Department of Electrical Engineering and Elec- Since March 2001, electricity trading in England and Wales
tronics, University of Manchester, Manchester M60 1QD, U.K. (e-mail: Daniel.
kirschen@manchester.ac.uk). has been governed by NETA. Unlike its predecessor, the Elec-
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.860924 tricity Pool of England and Wales, NETA does not dictate how
0885-8950/$20.00 © 2006 IEEE
GARCIA AND KIRSCHEN: FORECASTING SYSTEM IMBALANCE VOLUMES 241
In summary, these results show that past NIV data are not
a good predictor of future values. NIV time series are noisy,
unstructured, changing, and normally distributed. It should not
come as a surprise that NIV is a clear example of the central
limit theorem because it results from a large number of actions
by different market participants acting independently.
Fig. 5. Actual and forecasted values of NIV for the month-ahead forecasts using the best network.
TABLE V The number of cases and their selection for the required data
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR WEEKLY FORECAST (WORKING DAYS) sets can be modified as more data become available. Different
forecasting scenarios may require a different number of cases to
be included in the data sets. The more updated information the
network can use for learning, the better the forecast becomes.
However, it is important to avoid overtraining since that would
lead to an inflexible network and inaccurate results.
Multidimensional forecasting using NNs gives a better ac-
curacy than other multidimensional methods based on linear
regression. Table VI compares the monthly forecast obtained
with NNs and with a production-grade program based on linear
regression methods. Table VII presents a similar comparison
for working and nonworking days in the weekly scenario. NNs
also outperform one-dimensional linear methods forecasting.
Table VIII compares the accuracy of multidimensional NNs
with one-dimensional methods for weekly forecast. In all
cases, the NNs outperform other methods, even when the time
horizon is larger than the one considered in the one-dimensional
forecasting.
VII. CONCLUSION
Competition increases the need for forecasting in power sys-
tems. New market variables present complex structures that are
not easily modeled by traditional techniques. A recently devel-
oped data mining technique can provide the necessary tools to
uncover nonlinear relations between these variables and identify
TABLE VI
ERROR COMPARISON FOR MONTHLY FORECAST the best predictors for the variables to be forecast. The appli-
cation of classical techniques in combination with data mining
NNs yields a more accurate and realistic performance than con-
ventional forecasting techniques. However, to maintain a rea-
sonable accuracy, these networks must be updated on a regular
basis.
While the results presented in this paper demonstrate that
the proposed approach yields forecasts that are useful and fi-
nancially valuable, it is clear that the accuracy of forecasts of
market variables is still much lower than the accuracy that one
can achieve when trying to predict daily or weekly load profiles
and prices. Differences in accuracy when forecasting different
TABLE VII
ERROR COMPARISON FOR WEEKLY FORECAST variables can be explained by a number of factors. For any vari-
(WORKING AND NONWORKING DAYS) able, the main difficulties in forecasting arise from high noise,
nonlinear effects, data availability, and length of the forecasting
horizon. Therefore, when comparing the accuracy of forecasts
of NIV and electricity prices, one should consider the following.
• NIV is more volatile than prices. If the volatility is de-
fined as the standard deviation of the rate of change of the
normalized variables, NIV’s volatility is 0.08 compared
with 0.04 and 0.009 for the system buy and sell prices,
TABLE VIII
ERROR COMPARISON FOR WEEKLY FORECAST (ONE-DIMENSIONAL
respectively.
AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL NNs) • NIV needs to be forecasted one week to one month ahead,
while electricity prices forecasts are usually performed for
shorter horizons [5]–[7], [9], [10], [32].
• There are no clear linear relations between NIV and other
market variables, while several studies have shown linear
relations between prices and other market variables, such
as demand and capacity shortfalls [7], [32].
aggregation in six blocks of four hours per day (i.e., aggregated • NIV is a newer variable than prices. Much less historical
in so-called EFA blocks). data are thus available since the market only started in
248 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 21, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006
2001 and has since undergone several rule changes that [16] C. Pete, C. Julian, K. Randy, and K. Thomas, “CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-By-
have caused external modifications in the data. Step Data Mining Guide,”, 2000.
[17] D. Pyle, Data Preparation for Data Mining. San Francisco, CA:
Finally, the true measure of improvement when forecasting Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
market imbalance volumes is not an abstract error index but [18] L. A. Wehenkel, Automatic Learning Techniques in Power Systems.
Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1998.
rather the savings in balancing costs that this improvement [19] M. P. Garcia, “Forecasting system imbalance volumes and analysis of
makes possible. With a one-month-ahead time scale in partic- unusual events in competitive electricity markets,” Ph.D. dissertation,
ular, the 20% error reduction in the forecasted volume that the Univ. Manchester, Manchester, U.K., 2005.
[20] C. Antunes and A. Oliveira, “Temporal data mining: An overview,” pre-
proposed method achieves makes possible a significant increase sented at the 7th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data
in the amount of energy that can be the traded in the forward Mining (KDD-2001), San Francisco, CA, 2001.
market and hence a substantial saving in balancing costs. [21] M. Gavrilov, D. Anguelov, P. Indyk, and R. Motwani, “Mining the stock
market: Which measure is best?,” presented at the Conf. Knowledge Dis-
covery Data, Boston, MA, 2000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT [22] (2006) Electronic Statistics Textbook. Statsoft, Tulsa, OK. [Online].
Available: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html
The authors would like to thank Dr. C. Aldridge for his [23] D. Peña, G. C. Tiao, and R. Tsay, “Basic concepts in univariate time
assistance. series,” in A Course in Time Series Analysis, Wiley series in Probability
and Statistics. Probability and statistics, J. W. Sons, Ed. New York:
Wiley-Interscience, 2000, p. 496.
REFERENCES [24] J. B. Elsner and A. A. Tsonis, “Singular spectrum analysis: A new tool
in time series analysis,” in A New Tool in Time Series Analysis, J. B.
[1] P. K. Dash, G. Ramakrishna, A. C. Liew, and S. Rahman, “Fuzzy neural Elsner, Ed. New York: Plenum, 1996.
networks for time-series forecasting of electric load,” Proc. Inst. Elect. [25] N. Golyandina, V. Nekrutkin, and A. Zhigljavsky, Analysis of Time Se-
Eng., Gener., Transm., Distrib., vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 535–544, Sep. 1995. ries Structure. SSA and Related Techniques, 2001.
[2] D. W. Bunn, “Forecasting loads and prices in competitive power mar- [26] C. Alexander, Market Models: A Guide to Financial Data Analysis.
kets,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 163–169, Feb. 2000. New York: Wiley, 2001.
[3] A. Sfetsos, “Short-term load forecasting with a hybrid clustering algo- [27] S. K. Kachigan, Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Intro-
rithm,” in Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Gener., Transm., Distrib., vol. 150, May duction, 2nd ed. New York: Radius, 1991.
2003, pp. 257–262. [28] T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd ed., 2001.
[4] B. Kermanshahi and H. Iwamiya, “Up to year 2020 load forecasting [29] T. Kolarik and G. Rudorfer, “Time series forecasting using neural net-
using neural nets,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 24, pp. 789–797, works,” J. Time Series Neural Netw., pp. 86–94, 2004.
2002. [30] S.-H. C. a. S. H. Kim, “Data mining for financial prediction and trading:
[5] J. Bastian, J. Zhu, V. Banunarayanan, and R. Mukerji, “Forecasting en- Application to single and multiple markets,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 26,
ergy prices in a competitive market,” Inst. Elect. Eng. Comput. Appl. pp. 131–139, 2004.
Power, pp. 40–45, 1999. [31] Y. JingTao and T. C. Lim, “Guidelines for financial forecasting with
[6] J. C. Cuaresma, J. Hlouskova, S. Kossmeier, and M. Obersteiner, neural networks,” presented at the Int. Conf. Neural Information Pro-
“Forecasting electricity spot-prices using linear univariate time-series cessing, Shanghai, China, 2001.
models,” Appl. Energy, vol. 77, pp. 87–106, 2004. [32] H. Y. Yamin, S. Shahidehpour, and Z. Li, “Adaptive short-term elec-
[7] C. P. Rodriguez and G. J. Anders, “Energy price forecasting in the On- tricity price forecasting using artificial neural networks in the restruc-
tario competitive power system market,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. tured power markets,” Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 26, pp. 571–581,
19, no. 1, pp. 366–374, Feb. 2004. 2004.
[8] X. Wang, N. Hatziargyriou, and L. H. Tsoulakas, “A new methodology
for nodal forecasting in deregulated power systems,” IEEE Power Eng.
Rev., pp. 48–51, 2002.
[9] F. J. Nogales, J. Contreras, A. J. Conejo, and R. Espinola, “Forecasting
next-day electricity prices by time series models,” IEEE Trans. Power Maria P. Garcia received the electrical engineer’s degree from the Universidad
Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 342–348, May 2002. Pontificia de Comillas, Madrid, Spain, in 2001 and the M.Sc. degree in power
[10] J. Contreras, R. Espinola, F. Nogales, and A. J. Conejo, “ARIMA models systems from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
to predict next-day electricity prices,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, (UMIST), Manchester, U.K., in 2001. She is currently working toward the Ph.D.
no. 3, pp. 1014–1020, Aug. 2003. degree at UMIST.
[11] D. Pilipovic, “Energy risk: Valuing and managing energy derivatives,”
J. Energy Lit., vol. 4, p. 111, 1998.
[12] P. Stephenson and M. Paun, “Electricity market trading,” Power Eng. J.,
vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 277–288, Dec. 2001.
[13] Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM), “NGC System Oper- Daniel S. Kirschen (M’86–SM’91) received the electrical and mechanical engi-
ator Incentive Scheme from April 2004,”, Dec. 2003. neer’s degree from the Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, in 1979
[14] R. S. Tsay, “Analysis of financial time series,” in Wiley Series in Proba- and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of
bility & Statistics. New York: Wiley, Dec. 21, 2001, p. 472. Wisconsin-Madison in 1980 and 1985, respectively.
[15] Z. Vojinovic, K. Vojislav, and R. Seidel, “A data mining approach to From 1985 to 1994, he worked for Control Data Corporation and for Siemens.
financial time series modeling and forecasting,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Ac- He is currently a Professor of electrical energy systems at the University of Man-
count., Fin., Manage., vol. 10, pp. 225–239, 2001. chester, Manchester, U.K.