Born-Haber Cycle
Born-Haber Cycle
Born-Haber Cycle
Worksheet 1
1. Identify each of the following enthalpy changes:
(c) K(s)
K(g)
(d) Ca(g)
Ca2+(g)
(e) Cl2(g)
2Cl(g)
(f) ½ O2(g)
O(g)
(g) O2(g)
2O(g)
(h) O(g)
O2(g)
Ca2+(g) + 2H+(g)
Identify
H5
H1 ……………………………
Ca2+(g) + 2e + 2H(g) H2 ……………………………
H4
H3 ……………………………
H2
Ca(s) + H2(g)
H1
CaH2(s)
The sum of the ionic radii in MgH2 is smaller than in CaH2 but charges the same
so there is a stronger (forces of) electrostatic attraction between ions in MgH2
Answer
........................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[2]
(b) A Born–Haber cycle for the formation of lithium chloride is shown below.
Li + (g) + e – + Cl(g)
Li +(g) + Cl – (g)
Li + (g) + e – + 12 Cl 2 (g)
1
Li(g) + 2 Cl 2 (g) Hlatt
Ha
1
Li(s) + 2 Cl 2 (g)
LiCl(s)
Enthalpy change
/kJ mol–1
Enthalpy of formation of lithium chloride(s) –409
Enthalpy of atomisation of lithium +161
Enthalpy of atomisation of chlorine +122
(ii) The enthalpy change Ha is the enthalpy of atomisation of lithium metal.
Suggest, and explain, whether you would expect the value of Ha for potassium to
be more or less endothermic than that for lithium.
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [2]
(c) (i) State TWO properties of ions that affect the value for the lattice energy of ionic
compounds.
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [2]
(ii) The calculated value for the lattice energy of potassium chloride is almost exactly
the same value as that found experimentally.
Why is the theoretical value for the lattice energy of silver chloride, –833 kJ mol–1,
so different from the experimentally determined value of –905 kJ mol–l? [2]
Mg 2+(g) + 2Cl(g) + 2e –
Mg(g) + Cl 2 (g)
Mg(s) + Cl 2 (g)
MgCl 2 (s)
(a) Define the term:
Enthalpy of atomisation. (2)
Is the heat energy change for the formation of ONE mole of gaseous
atoms from its element in its standard state.
(b) (i) Identify on the diagram the chance representing the enthalpy of atomisation of
magnesium.
(1)
(ii) Use the data below to calculate the first electron affinity of chlorine.
– 348 kJ mol–1
Value / kJ mol–1
Enthalpy of atomisation of calcium, ∆Ha(calcium) +193
1st ionisation energy of calcium, I.E1 +590
2nd ionisation energy of calcium, I.E2 +1150
Enthalpy of atomisation of iodine, ∆Ha(iodine) +107
Lattice energy of calcium iodide, ∆Hlatt –2074
Enthalpy of formation of calcium iodide, ∆Hf –534
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [2]
(ii) Write suitable symbols or values in the boxes to label the Born-Haber cycle below.
Ca(s) + 2I(g)
Ca(s) + e + 2I(g)
Ca(s) + 2I(g)
(2)
Ans : –303.5 kJ mol–1
(b) The values of the lattice energies of potassium iodide and calcium iodide
experimentally determined from Born-Haber cycles and theoretically calculated
from an ionic model are shown below.
(i) Explain why the experimental lattice energy of potassium iodide is less
exothermic than the experimental lattice energy of calcium iodide.
...................................................................
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [3]
(ii) Explain why the experimental and theoretical values of the lattice energy are
almost the same for potassium iodide, but are significantly different for
calcium iodide.
...................................................................
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [3]
H5
Ca 2+ (g) + O(g) + 2e –
H4
2+ –
Ca (g) + ½ O 2 (g) + 2e
H3 H6
+ –
Ca (g) + ½ O 2 (g) + e
H2
Ca(g) + ½ O 2 (g)
H1
Ca(s) + ½ O 2 (g)
H7
CaO(s)
H1 = +193; H2= 590; H3 = +1150; H4 = +248; H6 = –3513; H7 = –635.
(i) Identify the change which represents the lattice enthalpy of CaO.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [1]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [3]
(ii) Would the value of H2 be larger or smaller for magnesium than it is for calcium?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [3]
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [2]
9. The calculated value of L.E of rubidium chloride RbCl is 674 KJmol –1 ; It is very
similar to the experiment value 676 KJmol –1. Give a reason for the similarity.
Ans:
For ionic compounds the result of exp. Hlatt is the same as the result from the calculated.
10. Explain why does the lattice enthalpy of the chlorides of Group I becomes less exothermic as
the group is descended ?
Answer
Hlatt becomes less exothermic (decreases in magnitude) from NaCl to CsCl since there is a
decreased electrostatic attraction due to:
The larger the sum of the ionic radii, the more distance there is between them, and the
weaker the electrostatic forces holding them together.
Na(g) Cl(g)
Na+(g) + Cl(g)
Use the above diagram and the following data to calculate H for the reaction
Cl(g) + e
Cl(g)
Na(s)
Na(g) H = 107 kJ mol–1
Na (g)
Na+(g) H = 496 kJ mol–1
½ Cl2(g)
Cl(g) H = 122 kJ mol–1
NaCl(s)
Na+(g) + Cl(g) H = +780 kJ mol–1
12. The Born-Haber cycle for the formation of calcium chloride is shown below:
E
Ca2+(g) + 2Cl(g) CaCl2(s)
B D
F
Ca(g) + 2Cl(g)
A C
Ca(s) + Cl2(g)
Mg2+(g) + O2(g)
Identify
H4
H1 ……………………………
Mg2+(g) + 2e + O(g) H2 ……………………………
H3 H3 ……………………………
H1
Mg(s) + ½ O2(g)
H6
MgO(s)
(b) MgO(s) has the same crystal structure as NaCl(s). The lattice enthalpy of NaCl(s) is
–771kJmol–1 whilst that of MgO(s) is –3889 kJ mol–1.
Explain the difference in lattice enthalpies. (4)
In MgO, the two doubly charged ions Mg2+ and O2 would have stronger electrostatic
attraction than in NaCl.
The sum of the ionic radii (distance) between Mg2+ and O2 is smaller than that between
Na+ and Cl. Thus there will be stronger electrostatic forces holding Mg2+ and O2 together.
or
value
/ kJ mol–1 / kJ mol–1
Mg(s)
Mg(g) + 150 Hlatt.[MgCl] 753
Mg(g)
Mg+(g) + 740 Hlatt.[MgCl2] 2490
Mg+(g)
Mg2+(g) + 1500 Hlatt.[MgCl3] 5450
Mg2+(g)
Mg3+(g) + 7700
½Cl2(g)
Cl(g) + 122
Cl(g) Cl(g)
365
(c) Which of the three compounds MgCl, MgCl2 , MgCl3 is /are energetically stable
with respect to the elements?
o The L.E corresponds to the strength of the ionic bond in an ionic solid.
o L.E is always exothermic
o L.E is difficult be to determine or measure directly. So it found either by Born-Haber
cycles or Enthalpy level diagram [ i.e an application of Hess's Law ].
o The larger the negative value of L.E i.e. the more exothermic the process, the more
stable is the lattice being formed.
Ions in gaseous
state
affinities
L.E
Ionisations
atomisations
Route 1
H lattice becomes less exothermic as the sum of ionic radii or distance (size) between the
ions increases.
[ If sum of ionic radii increases, there will be weaker electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions]
2. Charges on ions
L.E becomes more exothermic as the magnitude of the charge of the ions increases.
Reason: There will be stronger electrostatic attraction between the oppositely charged ions.
The experimental (from Born Haber) and theoretical values of the L.E are almost
the same for a purely ionic model. [Good fit]
The experimental values of L.E (from Born Haber) are bigger (more exothermic)
than the values calculated from a purely ionic model only if the bonding has a
significant degree of covalent character in an ionic bon , due to the polarisation of
the anions by the cations.
Na2O
2 moles of Na+ 1 mole of O2
so 2 I.E1 so 1 ( E.A1 + E.A2 )
2 Na+ O2
+1 means I.E1 - 2 means E.A1 + E.A2
CaCl2
2 mole of Cl
1mole of Ca2+ so 2 Ha(Cl)
so 1 Ha Ca 2 E.A1
1 ( I.E1 + I.E2 )
Ca2+ 2Cl
charge = +2 I.E1 + I.E2 - 1 means E.A1
Ca2+ forms we include the 1st and 2nd ionisation energies of magnesium
( and not 2 1st ionisation energy !
Since 2 chloride ions 2Clare involved , so we double all quantities i.e 2 Ha ; 2 E.A1
(not 1st + 2nd E.A)