See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/220979310

ICT, National Policies, and their Impact on Schools and Teachers’

Development

Conference Paper · January 2003

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_4 · Source: DBLP

CITATIONS READS

23 7,123

1 author:

Rosa Maria Bottino

Italian National Research Council
154 PUBLICATIONS   980 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

A me gli occhi (your eyes to me) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Rosa Maria Bottino on 14 May 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 leT. National Policies, and their Impact on Schools
and Teachers' Development

Rosa Maria Bottino

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche, Via De Marini 6-16149,
Genova, Italy, bottino@itd.ge.cnr.it

1. INTRODUCTION

This paper briefly sketches Italian public policy in promoting the use of
ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) in school education
(primary and secondary level). It tries to identify aspects that appear to be
supporting the development of pedagogically 'sound' approaches to
technology, enhanced teaching and learning, as well as some of the problems
that are in evidence.
The objective is to contribute to the discussion on the ways in which
public policy can facilitate the development of appropriate forms of
technology use in school, considering it in the wider perspective of the
information society.

2. ITALIAN POLICY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT

OF TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING

For some years the Italian government has put in place programmes to
equip educational institutions with the necessary ICT infrastructure and to
train teachers.
In 1997 the Ministry of Education launched a Programme for the
Development of Educational Technologies (PSTD) having as its main stated
goals: the provision of infrastructure to schools (PCs, internet connections,
etc.); the improvement of teachers' professional skills in using ICT; the
improvement of effectiveness of learning and teaching methods and content;
and the promotion of the use ofICT and multimedia tools among students.
C. Dowling et al. (eds.), Information and Communication Technology and the Teacher of the Future
© International Federation for Information Processing 2003
42 Rosa Maria Bottino

Moreover the Italian government, in line with the eEurope Plan

(www.europa.eu), adopted an Action Plan for the Information Technology
Society on June 2000 with the aim of further completing and strengthening
the educational technologies development programme.
The programme offered funding to individual schools for the creation of
equipped laboratories and for organising autonomous basic ICT courses for
teachers. A total of 13,300 schools were involved between 1997 and 2001.
The situation is quite different from school to school with regard, for
example, to school level, school typology, and school geographical location.
Table 1 briefly summarises the average current situation regarding
technology infrastructure in schools (Fierli, 2002). It can be noted that
technological equipment is mainly located in laboratories, and access is
seldom available from classrooms.

Table 1. Average situation in Italy regarding technology infrastructure in schools

School level PC/students Schools with Internet
connections (%)
Primary school (age 6-11) 1/50 80%
Lower secondary (age 11-14) 1/25 80%
Upper secondary (age 14-19) 1/10 (from about 1/5 of From 100% of technical
technical schools to 1/25 of schools to 80% of Iycei
Iycei)

As far as teacher training is concerned, the first widespread initiative of

the Government was the National Plan for Informatics (launched in 1985).
This was a centralized plan for in-service mathematics teacher training
whose aim was to provide basic computer science literacy. This training plan
was enacted through courses for teachers in which traditional lessons
alternated with computer practice. The method used was a 'pull-down' one
(i.e. the training programme is operated through trainers who are in-service
teachers specifically trained for this purpose).
These training initiatives had been funded by the Ministry, but their
organisation and content had been left to schools. Between 1997 and 2001,
43,300 refresher courses for teachers were organised as a consequence.
Currently it can be said that approximately half of the Italian primary and
secondary school teachers have been involved in training initiatives related
to the use of information and multimedia technologies. Quality and depth of
training have been very variable.
Now the Ministry has launched and financed the development of on-line
services for training support. On-line training at present involves
approximately 60,000 teachers.
For the next year a new initiative (funded with UMTS license incomes)
will involve 180,000 teachers. This initiative will provide 12 hours of
training for each teacher (six hours face to face and six hours online).
leT, National Policies, and their Impact on Schools and Teachers' 43
Development

In addition to the great effort of the Government in providing schools with

ICT infrastructure and teachers with a basic knowledge in ICT, the Ministry
has recently promoted initiatives to support the use of ICT in classroom
practice. Some projects have been launched to provide teachers with
examples of practice in which technology has been used to support the
teaching of discipline topics. Such projects (SET projects, INDIRE
documentation of experiences) are aimed at publishing on the Internet
didactical itineraries (both at primary and secondary school level) on
curricular topics integrating ICT. These projects have had positive aspects
(such as the involvement of both teachers and educational researchers in the
implementation of the educational itineraries) and have represented
interesting experiences for the teachers directly involved in the work, but
still they have not had a significant impact on a wider basis.

3. IMPACT ON SCHOOL EDUCATION

Despite the efforts made in the field of training and in the equipping of
schools, to date the results at the school level are still relatively limited.
There is not a wide integration of ICT use as tools to enhance teaching and
learning in curricular topics.
Even when the use of ICT, though with differing modes and
characteristics, enters into teaching practice, one often observes purely
superficial changes that do not impact upon the effective renewal of the
syllabuses and methods, i.e. the modification of the methodological
approaches, the content and relational dynamics in classes and schools, and
the organisational aspects within schools (Bottino & Furinghetti, 1999). This
situation is not substantially different from that in other European countries
(Mallon, 2002).
One can observe that the government programme for the development of
educational technologies has achieved significant results in providing
schools with technology infrastructure and a considerable number of
teachers with ICT basic skills. Nevertheless this has not led directly to an
improvement of teaching and learning methods and to a change in
approaching discipline subjects. A direct relationship cannot be established
between provision of infrastructure and ICT training, and the effective
pedagogical use of technology in schools. This last goal is less clearly
supported by governmental polices and needs a careful consideration of
related difficulties and possible interventions.
44 Rosa Maria Bottino

Difficulties that can be shown are of a different nature and can be related
both to technical and structural problems and to more general organisational
and pedagogical aspects I(Prometeus Position Paper, 2001).
It is a fact that the resistance on the part of many teachers to using leT in
class can be ascribed to technical and structural problems such as, for
example, the lack of technical personnel to help manage laboratories, the fact
that the substantial time dedicated to preparation of materials and lessons
which integrate technology use is not acknowledged in teachers' current
work time, and the limits imposed by the overall scholastic system (the ever
increasing number of subjects and topics present in syllabuses, the limited
time available, the question of individual assessment of students, etc.). The
often poor quality of educational software available, with a predominance on
the market, especially at primary and secondary school levels, of
substantially drill and practice systems, have often reduced the initial
enthusiasm of teachers towards the use of technology as a means to renew
and improve teaching methods.
Moreover, leT training often has been confined to the development of
product-related skills rather then being aimed at the promotion of more
general and critical skills (such as, for example, how to choose among
different products, how to develop capacities of finding proper and
meaningful information on the web, how to use available products in
discipline teaching, etc.).
Nevertheless, even if all the preceding considerations are true, one will
miss the point if he or she does not consider that, from a pedagogical point
of view, it is pointless to make leT based tools available if the educational
strategies and the activities the learners engage in are not suitably revised.
Technology can influence learning by fundamentally changing both the
content of a subject and the way in which that content can be taught and
learnt.
It is widely recognised that the professional development of teachers in
the field of leT has to be carried out through the development of
competencies both in their use and in their integration in discipline teaching.
In the initial pioneering period the influence of the 'computer
anxiety/appeal' has strongly pushed towards the necessity of teachers
acquiring a practical knowledge about computers and computer related
products. After a number of experimentations, it has been recognised that to
confine teachers' knowledge only to this level is not fruitful and could be
dangerous.
These considerations bring with them the problem of the policies that can
be enacted to promote such changes.
 leT, National Policies, and their Impact on Schools and Teachers' 45
Development

4. FROM 'TECHNOLOGY PUSH' TO 'DEMAND

PULL'
Policies should move from technology push (i.e. actions that are driven by
the necessity to make the technology available and usable) to 'demand-pull'
(i.e. actions that are driven by users' needs and pedagogical opportunities).
Politicians should be convinced that leT is not, by itself, an easy and
cheap solution to educational problems. The successful introduction of leT
in schools is determined not only by money invested, but also by a change of
mental habit.
Until fairly recently the use of leT tools such as word-processing,
graphics packages, database and spreadsheet applications, has often been
proposed as evidence of technology uptake and integration into learning and
teaching. While many worthwhile uses have been made of these tools, their
integration has largely been as an optional addendum to an unchanging
traditional teaching environment.
When reflecting on the design and use of technology for education we
need to consider the whole teaching and learning situation; not only how
technology can be applied but also the needs of the teachers who will use it,
the ways in which it will be used, the curriculum objectives, the social
context and the way in which learning is organised.
This means that consideration needs to be given to the definition of
meaningful practices through which technology can be used effectively. The
design itself of educational technology should include examples of
meaningful pedagogical processes based on a widespread consensus derived
from appropriate pedagogical research. These considerations can have an
impact on policies to promote technology enhanced learning.
The next stage for policies should be to concentrate on the provision of a
network for disseminating good practices, research results, discussions, and
exchange of ideas and perspectives in order to promote a true synergy
among the different actors. In other words, it is necessary to intervene in the
school context to promote a paradigm shift in ways of looking at teaching
and learning processes, considering the innovations and needs brought about
by new technologies not only in schools but in the society as a whole.
Even if it is not possible to define a single strategy for promoting such
change, some general indications can be outlined:
• Promoting co-operation among teachers, researchers in educational
technology and in discipline subjects, administrators, trainers, parents,
etc. This could be done by increasing investments in research and
development and in the creation of new learning environments for
working together. In particular, it should be considered that any
46 Rosa Maria Bottino

partnership for change in the relationship between research and

classroom activity must include teachers as equal partners. As a matter
of fact, what has not yet taken place sufficiently is the co-operation of
experts across the diverse disciplines in research and practice networks.
The essential enabling mechanism for such networks is the
implementation of mutual exchange and verification of practicable
results. As an example: educational concepts of IT support for education
have to undergo technological implementation, and technological
concepts of IT support for education have to undergo educational
verification.
• Promoting the collection, documentation, and diffusion of good practice
examples. There is a mounting interest in aspects related not only to
software design, but also to the definition of ways of use suited to
exploiting software features in order to accomplish meaningful teaching
and learning activities. It is therefore not enough to establish collections
of best practice, or to codify knowledge about e-learning, since the
knowledge will only be of use to teachers and learners who are new to e-
learning if it is made suitable for people in their position, rather than for
experts. Moreover, the study of models for effective dissemination of
successful pilot projects is needed to ensure teachers are aware of the
potential of technology-supported learning.
• Promoting curricular change, shifting the focus from knowledge as a set
of content to knowledge as an integration of processes and skills. The
changing global context due to the impact of ICT is redefining the type
of literacy and skills that are needed. Such skills are not only technical
(e.g. how to access and use distributed and continuously changing
information), but also cognitive (i.e. how to integrate different
knowledge), relational (i.e. how to foster interpersonal capacities,
responsibility, co-operation, adaptability, flexibility, etc.), and
concerning high-order thinking (such as problem solving, creative
thinking, decision making etc.). The crucial importance of new skills has
started to receive considerable political interest throughout Europe.
Several actions have been launched by the European Commission such
as the Action Plan for skills and mobility (European Commission, 2002)
and the establishment of the European ICT Skills Monitoring Group
(2002).
• Rethinking teachers' training as a life-long learning perspective. Even if
the aim of training, at a first level, has been to give teachers sufficient
levels of confidence, competence and flexibility in the use of new
technologies, this is not enough to significantly affect the process of
innovation. Teachers need to be given the training to operate effectively
in ICT-rich environments and the 'space' within their school based
leT, National Policies, and their Impact on Schools and Teachers' 47
Development

work, to take advantage of the potential it offers. The integration of rCT

use into pre and in-service programmes for teachers will need to support
them not in the automation of traditional process, but rather to use rCT
to support active engagement, problem solving, group learning,
interactions, feedback and connections with the 'outside' world.
Training should be based on planning and reflection on classroom
practice and potential new practice, including a reflection of their own
roles as teachers and of learners' roles. Some recent UNESCO reports
can be considered as reference in this regard (see UNESCO 2001, 2002).

REFERENCES
Bottino, R. M. & Furinghetti, F. (1999). Mathematics teachers, new technologies and
professional development: Opportunities and problems. In N. Ellerton (Ed.), Mathematics
Teachers Development: International Perspectives (pp. I-II). Australia: Meridian Press.
Bottino, R. M., Kearney, N., Lefrere, P. & Lindquist, K. (Eds) (2001). Position Paper. Open
Consultation Process. PROMETEUS Report. Retrieved from http://www.prometeus.org/
E_gatekeeper .cfm?FileID= 148
European Commission (2002). Retrieved from http://europa.eu.intlcomm/
employment_social/news/2002/feb/ap_en.html
European ICT Skills Monitoring Group (2002). Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/
enterprise/ictlpolicy/ict-skills.htm
Fierli, M. (2002). Le Tecnologie Didattiche Nella Scuola: Stato Dell'arte e Prospettive,
Italian Ministry of Education, Atti multimediali del Convegno. TED2002, Genova,
maintained by D. Persico, L. Ferlino, G. Olimpo, M. Tavella & C. Tirendi. Retrieved from
http://www.ted-online.itlatti2002/index.htm
Mallon, M. (Ed.) (2002). Addressing Change in the Role of the Teacher in ICT Based
Learning: Uptake and Integration Considerations. PROMETEUS Report. Retrieved from
http://www.prometeus.org
UNESCO (2001). Report on: Teacher Education through Distance Learning: Technology,
Curriculum, Evaluation and Cost. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/
0012/001253/125396e.pdf
UNESCO (2002). Report on: Teacher Education Guidelines: Using Open and Distance
Learning. Retrieved from htpp://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/OO 12/00 1253/l25396e.pdf

View publication stats