Author's Accepted Manuscript: Psychiatry Research
Author's Accepted Manuscript: Psychiatry Research
Author's Accepted Manuscript: Psychiatry Research
www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres
PII: S0165-1781(16)30555-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.066
Reference: PSY10877
To appear in: Psychiatry Research
Received date: 4 April 2016
Revised date: 19 September 2017
Accepted date: 25 September 2017
Cite this article as: Aliyah Rehman, Andrew Gumley and Stephany Biello, Sleep
Quality and Paranoia: The role of alexithymia, negative emotions and perceptual
anomalies, Psychiatry Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.066
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for
publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of
the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form.
Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which
could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Sleep Quality and Paranoia: the role of alexithymia, negative emotions
and perceptual anomalies.
a
School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
b
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
1
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that sleep problems are associated with psychotic like
association are not well understood and thus studies modelling hypothesised mediating
factors are required. Alexithymia, the inability to recognise and describe emotions
within the self may be an important candidate. In two separate studies we sought to
investigate factors mediating the relationship between sleep quality and paranoia using a
in an online survey. In study 1, regression and mediation analyses showed that the
relationship between sleep quality and paranoia was partially mediated by alexithymia,
perceptual anomalies and negative affect. In contrast, study 2 found that the relationship
*
Corresponding author at: School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street,
1
between sleep quality and paranoia was fully mediated by negative affect, alexithymia
and perceptual anomalies. The link between sleep quality and paranoia is unclear and
reasons for discrepant results are discussed. Novel findings in this study include the link
1. Introduction
Paranoia, defined as the unfounded fear that others intend to cause you harm, is
(Freeman & Garety, 2000). Paranoid thinking is not confined to psychosis, and is
reported by up to 30% of the general population (Freeman et al., 2005, 2007). However,
studying symptoms like paranoia at a sub-clinical level can further inform our
knowledge about symptoms at a clinical level in line with psychosis continuum models,
as well as identify candidate variables for future clinical research (van Os et al., 2009).
Recent research has identified a robust link between sleep disturbances and
paranoia. At the non-clinical level, sleep loss in healthy individuals leads to an increase
in paranoid thoughts (Kahn-Greene et al., 2007, Reeve et al., 2017). Another study
administered the Oxford Sleep Survey which includes questions on sleep and psychotic
like experiences (PLE’s) to over 1000 students. Results found links between a number
distress and PLE’s including paranoia (Sheaves et al., 2016). In a large –scale general
population study conducted of 8,580 people, there were strong relationships between
2
insomnia and paranoia. Insomnia was associated with an approximately two to threefold
increase in paranoid thinking (Freeman et al., 2010). Prospectively, insomnia was also a
emotional variables, in both clinical and non-clinical samples (Myers et al., 2010,
With the link between sleep and paranoia being established, the next step turns
to identifying how sleep and paranoia are related (Reeve, et al., 2015). This question
approach that allows us to identify factors that significantly explain the variance
between our independent (sleep) and dependent variable (paranoia) (Hayes, 2013).
These factors are termed mediators and can be useful in helping us identify targets for
Negative emotions such as anxiety and depression are linked to both sleep and
paranoia (Baglioni et al., 2011, Freeman et al., 2012) and have been identified as
potential mediators. Indeed, research has shown that negative emotions account largely
for the relationship between sleep and paranoia (Freeman et al., 2009, Freeman et al.,
2010, Mulligan et al., 2016, Reeve et al., 2017). Along with negative emotions, another
emotion related mediator that has been studied recently is emotion regulation.
Grezellschak et al.,( 2016) found that the effect of insomnia on paranoid ideation was
3
an infrequent use of effective strategies such as reappraisal. This suggests there may be
anomalies may also mediate the link between sleep and paranoia (Freeman et al., 2010).
Sleep deprivation has been known to induce perceptual anomalies such as hallucinations
(West, 1962). More recently, Sheaves et al., (2016) showed that insomnia was
paranoia (Freeman et al., 2002). No direct test of this exists although cannabis use
which can induce anomalous experiences partially mediates the relationship between
We sought to replicate and build on some of these findings. The main aim of our
verbalise their emotions (Bagby et al., 1994). Individuals with high alexithymia
sleep and paranoia. One study reported that that those with low levels of emotional
2007). Higher levels of alexithymia in people with psychosis have also been reported in
comparison to controls (Van- Wout et al., 2007, Kimhy et al., 2012). Furthermore,
sleepiness and nightmares (Bauermann et al., 2008). It has also been shown that under
4
similar to alexithymia (Killgore et al., 2008). More specifically, this study reported a
concerned with knowing and understanding our feelings (Killgore et al., 2008).
sleep quality and paranoia, in addition to negative emotional states such as anxiety and
depression.
A secondary aim of our study was to test whether perceptual anomalies mediates
measure of perceptual anomalies- the Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale (Bell et al.,
2006).
and perceptual anomalies predict paranoid thoughts and 2) that the relationship between
sleep quality and paranoia will be mediated by negative emotions, alexithymia and
perceptual anomalies. Study 2 was conducted to try and replicate the mediation model
we developed in study .
2. Study 1: Methods
to disclose paranoid thoughts, an anonymous online survey was set up using Qualtrics
(Provo, UT). The sample was recruited using the University of Glasgow’s School of
Psychology’s online subject pool. Participants were excluded from the study if they
drug use and were aged under 16. The online survey was available online from 2012 to
5
2013. The study was approved by the University of Glasgow, School of Psychology
Ethics committee.
2.2. Measures
(Watson et al., 1988). The range of scores for each sub-scale ranges from 10-50, with
higher scores meaning higher negative or positive affect. The PANAS can be used to
assess affect on various time scales by altering the instructions. For the present study
‘current moment’ assessment was used. Internal consistency in the study was (α = .84).
2.2.2. Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (Zigmond & Snaith 1983,
HADS).
The HADS is a self-report rating scale designed to measure both anxiety and
depression over the past week. It consists of two subscales, each containing seven items
on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 0-3). It is scored by summing the ratings for the
7 items of each subscale to yield separate scores for anxiety and depression. Internal
consistency in the study was (α = .82). The questionnaire has been psychometrically
oriented thinking. Scores range from 20-100 with higher scores reflect higher
6
Internal consistency for the TAS-20 is high α = .81 (Bagby et al., 1994). The
1994).
The PSQI provides a reliable, valid, and standardized measure of sleep quality.
Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores representing poorer sleep. A PSQI global
score > 5 indicates that a subject is having severe difficulty in at least two areas, or
moderate difficulty in more than three areas of sleep quality in the past month. Internal
consistency of the PSQI is high α = .83 (Buysse et al., 1989). The questionnaire has
2.2.5. Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale Part B (Green et al., 2008, GPTS).
The G-PTS is a 16-item measure of paranoia, assessing ideas of persecution over
the past month. Scores range from 16-80 with higher scores indicating greater levels of
and distress. The questionnaire has been psychometrically evaluated in clinical and non-
sensory intensity, distortion of the external world, sensory flooding and hallucinations.
Scores range from 0-32, higher scores mean higher endorsement of perceptual
anomalies. For the present study the time scale was changed to the ‘past month’ in order
7
the study was (α = .88). The questionnaire has been psychometrically evaluated in non-
thought to lie on a quasi- continuum, whereby ‘many endorse few paranoid thoughts
and few endorse many paranoid thoughts’ (Verdoux & van Os & 2002, Freeman et al.,
2005). To address this we dichotomised the variable. Subjects with paranoia scores at
the 75th percentile or above were classed as the ‘high paranoid’ group and those below
the 75th percentile as the ‘low-paranoid’ group (methodology adopted from Stopa &
Clark, 2001). The high paranoid group in our sample included a range of scores from
20-73, with some of the scores reaching levels that are reported in clinical groups
(Green et al, 2008). However, it is normal for non-clinical samples to have some
Next, linear regression models were run to test which variables significantly
predicted paranoid group membership. Our dependent variable was paranoid group (0=
low paranoia, 1= high paranoia). Forced entry and backward stepwise models were run
Mediation analysis was conducted using the SPSS macro PROCESS (model 4)
from the current sample to replicate the original sampling procedure (Hayes, 2013). For
the current study, we chose to set the number of bootstrapping samples to 10,000. In
turn, these 10,000 bootstrapping samples were used to generate a 95% confidence
interval for the mediation effect. The mediation effect is statistically significant if the
8
confidence interval does not contain the value of zero (Hayes, 2013). For ease of
3. Study 1: Results
males, 308 females) completed the survey with a mean age of 24 (SD= 8.1, range 16-
70). The correlations between all the variables are shown in table 2. Age was correlated
with several of our predictors including sleep quality, alexithymia and perceptual
Whitney U tests revealed gender was not related to any of our variables except anxiety
and depression. Anxiety scores were significantly higher in females (Mdn=8) than
males (Mdn=7), U=11985.5, p = 0.01 and depression scores were significantly higher in
males (Mdn = 5) than females (Mdn= 4), U= 12340.5, p = 0.04. As these differences are
Descriptive statistics of the low and high paranoid group are presented in table
3. Mann- Whitney U tests were used to test the validity of our grouping. Validity of our
grouping was confirmed as the high paranoid group reported higher levels of negative
9
affect, anxiety, depression, alexithymia, perceptual anomalies and paranoia. There were
Next, we ran logistic regressions with the predictors entered being age, negative
affect, sleep quality, anxiety, depression, perceptual anomalies and alexithymia. The
result of both logistic regressions is shown in table 4. A test of the full model against a
constant only model (no predictors) was statistically significant, indicating that the
predictors reliably distinguished between the paranoid and non-paranoid groups (2=
69.078, p <.0.001). The Wald test was used to determine what predictors are significant.
quality, alexithymia and perceptual anomalies. Age, anxiety and depression did not
significantly predict paranoid group membership. The log odds (Exp B) column in table
4 is an indicator of the log odds of being in the paranoid group due to a one point
increase in the predictor variable. For example, a one unit increase in negative affect
increases the odds of being in the paranoid group by 1.05, 95%CI [1.00-1.09].
Nagelkerke’s R2 of .231 indicated that 23% of the variance was explained by the
significant predictors. Similar results were obtained in the stepwise logistic regression
which also found that negative affect, sleep quality, alexithymia and perceptual
anomalies predicted paranoid group membership and this model explained 22% of the
variance (Nagelkerke’s R2 of .222). In sum, two separate regression models showed that
10
3.3. Main analysis: Mediation
We next tested hypothesis 2 that the relationship between sleep quality and
perceptual anomalies. As, anxiety and depression were not significant predictors of
paranoia in the logistic regressions, we did not include these variables in mediation
analysis. Paranoid group (high and low) was entered as the dependent variable, sleep
quality as the predictor variable, age as a co-variate and alexithymia, negative mood and
perceptual anomalies were entered as mediators. This model was significant as revealed
The indirect (mediation) pathway from PSQI to paranoia via negative affect was
significant b= 0.06, 95% CI [0.009, 0.143], the indirect (mediation) pathway from sleep
quality to paranoia via alexithymia was significant b= 0.11, 95% CI [0.033, 0.216], the
indirect (mediation) pathway from sleep quality to paranoia via perceptual anomalies
was significant, b= 0.13, 95% CI [0.03, 0.21]. Finally, the direct pathway from sleep
quality to paranoia was significant, b= 0.26, 95% CI [0.009, 0.527]. Together the results
support our hypothesis and suggest that the relationship between sleep quality and
did not alter the results and the effects remained the same size.
4. Study 2
collected data set. We hypothesised that the relationship between sleep quality and
and alexithymia.
11
4.1.Participants Procedure and Measures
were identical to study 1. A separate Qualtrics survey was available online 2013-2015.
Cronbach alphas were conducted for the following questionnaires: TAS-20 (α 0.85),
GPTS (α 0.95), PANAS (α 0.84), CAPS (α 0.86), HADS D (α 0.74) and HADS A (α
0.80).
5. Results
Table 5 presents the samples demographics. A total of 402 (n=114 males, 288 females)
individuals completed the survey with a mean age of 24 (SD = 10.8, range 16-77).
Overall, the sample from study 2 was similar to the sample in study 1. This was
differences between the samples in study 1 and 2 on anxiety, depression, positive affect,
(Mdn=17), U=62283, p = <0.001 and sample 2 were slightly younger (Mdn=20) than
sample 1 (Mdn=22), U=70386, p=0.002. The correlations between all the variables are
shown in table 6. Age was correlated with several our predictors including sleep quality,
further analysis. A series of Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that gender was not
12
5.2. Mediation Analysis Replication
Paranoid group was entered as the dependent variable, sleep quality as the
predictor variable, age as a co-variate and alexithymia, negative mood and perceptual
anomalies were entered as mediators. This model was significant as revealed by the
bootstrapped confidence intervals all being above 0. The indirect (mediation) pathway
to paranoia via negative affect was significant b= 0.06, 95% CI [0.012, 0.1450], the
indirect (mediation) pathway from sleep quality to paranoia via alexithymia was
significant b=0.08, 95% CI [0.012, 0.200], the indirect (mediation) pathway from sleep
quality to paranoia via perceptual anomalies was significant, b= 0.08, 95% CI [0.012,
0.200]. However, the direct pathway from sleep quality to paranoia was non-
significant, b=0.10, 95% CI [-0.1630, 0.3813]. In sum, the relationship between sleep
quality and paranoia was fully mediated by levels of negative affect, alexithymia and
perceptual anomalies. This contrasts with study 1 which found partial mediation.
the data in study 2 further by running post-hoc regression analyses to see whether we
The predictors entered were age, negative affect, anxiety, depression, perceptual
anomalies, sleep quality and alexithymia. A test of the full model against a constant
only model (no predictors) was statistically significant, indicating that the predictors
reliably distinguished between the paranoid and non-paranoid groups (2 = 94.331, p
<.0.001). The Wald test was used to determine what predictors are significant.
perceptual anomalies. Sleep quality, age, negative affect and depression did not
13
significantly predict paranoid group membership. The log odds (Exp B) is an indicator
of the log odds of being in the paranoid group due to a one point increase in the
predictor variable. For example, a one unit increase in anxiety increases the odds of
being in the paranoid group by 1.09, 95%CI [1.00, 1.19]. Nagelkerke’s R2 of .314
indicated that 31% of the variance was explained by the significant predictors. Similar
results were obtained in the stepwise logistic regression which also found that anxiety,
alexithymia and perceptual anomalies predicted paranoid group membership and this
model explained 30% of the variance (Nagelkerke’s R2 of .30). In sum, two separate
regression models showed that anxiety, alexithymia and perceptual anomalies predicted
membership of the paranoid group. Similar to the mediation results, we found sleep
quality did not predict paranoia. However, we also found that anxiety predicted
6. Discussion
Previous research has found that sleep is related to paranoia and that this
al., 2010, Reeve et al., 2017). Non-emotional factors such as perceptual anomalies have
also been proposed as potential mediators (Freeman et al., 2010). We sought to add to
this previous work by testing whether alexithymia is related to paranoia and whether it
mediates the relationship between sleep quality and paranoia. We also sought to test the
Our hypothesised mediation model proposed that the relationship between sleep quality
14
While this mediation model was found in both studies, we found discrepant results such
that there was partial mediation in study 1 and full mediation in study 2. The
discrepancy can be ruled out due to sample differences between study 1 and 2 as they
did not significantly differ in levels of sleep quality. Indeed, our post-hoc regression
analysis further confirmed that sleep quality was not a significant predictor of paranoia.
This is surprising as several studies have reported links between a range of sleep
disturbances and paranoia (Kahn-Greene et al., 2007, Sheaves et al., 2016, Reeve et al.,
2017).
The discrepancy could be due to our chosen measure of sleep. Sleep quality is a
broad term and the PSQI measures a wide range of sleep disturbances rather than focus
on a specific disturbance (Buysse et al., 1989). Research suggests that the relationship
between sleep and paranoia is strongest for insomnia. Insomnia has been found to
predict paranoia in cross-sectional studies (Grezellschak et al., 2016) but also predict
propose that while sleep quality scores did not differ between study 1 and 2, the nature
of the sleep disturbance may have. The participants in sample 1 may have experienced
more insomnia in comparison to sample 2. This may have resulted in significant results
in study 1 but not in study 2. Future research would benefit from focusing on specific
sleep disturbances.
Across both studies regression analyses showed that alexithymia predicted paranoia,
found some preliminary evidence that alexithymia may mediate the relationship
between sleep quality and paranoia. This suggests that along with negative emotions,
15
alexithymia is an additional emotional facet to consider when studying paranoia. Our
emotions provide us with information on how we are feeling at a given moment. These
emotions then help guide and direct us to make sense of the world, to make judgements
about others behaviours, intentions and emotions (Boden & Berenbaum 2010, Clore &
Huntsinger, 2001). In alexithymia, this ability is diminished and this may make such
individuals prone to faulty judgements and beliefs about others (including paranoid
beliefs). This fits with a study reporting that low levels of emotional awareness (high
alexithymia) was linked to higher levels of suspiciousness (Boden & Berenbaum, 2007).
Another line of evidence for our claim comes from research looking at alexithymia and
social dysfunction. One study found that individuals with difficulties identifying and
implications. Individuals with psychosis who also experience alexithymia may be at risk
of experiencing greater paranoia but struggle to convey their concerns to others. They
may also experience lower levels of trust towards their clinicians. As such, their
useful in clinical practice to identify individuals who may require support to understand
Scale. When individuals with alexithymia are identified, a focus on their emotional
mediated the relationship between sleep quality and paranoia. Negative emotions have
16
been linked to paranoia in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Freeman et al.,
2010, Freeman et al., 2012). In particular, anxiety has a strong association with
paranoia as they share many features such as the anticipation of threat and a worry
significant, with study 1 finding that negative affect predicted paranoia whilst in study 2
it was anxiety. Depression did not predict paranoia in either study. One of the reasons
for this may be because the samples in our studies had low levels of depression overall.
The HADS provides scoring criteria, with scores of 0-7 being normal, 8-10,
being borderline and more than 11 being clinically significant levels (Zigmond &
Snaith, 1983). In both samples, the mean depression scores in the low and high paranoid
groups fell in the normal range. This may be why depression was not a significant
predictor in our regression analyses. In contrast, our measure of negative affect was
measured with the PANAS, which was developed to measure a range of affective states
(Watson, 1988). The negative affect component covers a range of states such as jittery,
guilt and ashamed and is a measure of overall distress rather than a specific type of
negative emotion (Watson, 1988). These differences between measures may have
contributed to the discrepant results. It is also worth noting that the timeframe of the
questionnaires differed and may be another reason behind the different results. The
HADS timeframe is the past two weeks, whereas the PANAS was measured at the
“current” level. The current timeframe captures momentary states which would
A consistent finding across both studies was that perceptual anomalies predicted
paranoia and mediated the relationship between sleep quality and paranoia. It has been
17
long proposed that delusions serve as explanations for odd or strange internal
cognitive model of paranoid delusions, where paranoid beliefs arise from an attempt to
explain anomalous and odd internal experiences (Freeman et al., 2002). Indeed, research
has shown that perceptual anomalies increase the risk for the development of delusional
ideas (Krabbendam et al., 2004) and anomalies of experience caused by illegal drug use
have also been linked to delusional ideation (D’Souza et al., 2004). Our mediation
model suggests that one route that people with sleep problems may experience paranoia
The role of sleep quality is not clear, and our mediation model requires replication. In
regards to effect size, our results were significant but small. For example, our regression
models explained between 22-31% of the variance and many of the mediation effects
could be considered small as they lie between 0.10-0.20 (Cohen, 1992).Although small,
we feel they are clinically significant. A recent trial has found that improving sleep
disturbance with CBT-I in a student sample was associated with medium to large,
has found that the relationship between sleep loss (as found in insomnia) is associated
with moderate to large effect size increases in paranoia and negative emotions. This
study also found that negative affect accounted for 90% of the increase in paranoia after
sleep loss (Reeve et al., 2017). This highlights the usefulness of studying sleep and
18
with large effect size reductions in sleep disturbance (Freeman et al., 2015) and in
paranoia, perceptual anomalies and mood variables (Myers et al., 2010). One potential
reason for our small effect sizes in comparison to these papers is that they focused on
insomnia, whereas we looked at sleep quality. It may also be the case that the effects we
found in our mediation analysis would be larger and more exaggerated in a clinical
6.6 Limitations
Several limitations of our study should also be noted when considering the
results. Our study was cross-sectional and it is highly likely that the mediation model
pathways proposed are interacting and bi-directional over time. Furthermore, the
timeframe of our questionnaires also differed. The PANAS was measured at the
moment level, whilst sleep quality and paranoia at the monthly level. Therefore,
hypothesised causal links between variables should be interpreted with caution. To tease
out causal effects experimental and randomised control trials are called for. Another
way to look at causal effects could be to conduct experience sampling studies (Myin
Germey’s et al., 2009). This approach allows temporal mapping of relationships and
found that the relationship between a range of sleep parameters and paranoia was
The sample population was predominantly university students that may not be
representative of the general population. However, students are one population that may
experience higher levels of psychotic like experiences such as paranoia (Lincoln &
Keller, 2008) suggesting that this is a useful population to study psychotic experiences
in. The gender ratio of the sample was skewed with the majority of the sample being
19
females. This is a finding that has been noted in other online survey studies of paranoia
(Freeman et al., 2005). However, as there is some research to suggest that males may
experience more alexithymia (Levant et al., 2009), future studies should aim for more
gender-balanced studies. All our variables were skewed which could have reduced
power and the ability to detect certain relationships (Wilcox, 2001). However, we dealt
with the skewed data in a number of ways including bootstrapping making our results
more reliable and robust. Another limitation is that all our measures were self-report
and required the individual to accurately report their responses. The questionnaire
assessment of paranoia has the additional limitation that it may capture paranoid
thoughts that are justified suspicions to real threats. Nonetheless, laboratory based
virtual reality experiments where unfounded paranoia can be tested have reached the
We used the same recruitment method in sample 1 and 2 and have no way to
know whether some participants completed the survey in both study 1 and 2. However,
given that there is no incentive to complete the survey and that the survey is long and
extensive, we feel it is unlikely that someone would complete the survey twice.
symptoms lie on a continuum with normal experience, that non-clinical and clinical
symptoms share the same risk factors and the presence of non-clinical experiences
increase the risk of clinical disorder (van Os et al., 2009, Johns et al., 2004).
6.7. Conclusions
In conclusion, we found inconclusive evidence for a link between sleep quality
and paranoia. The current research also emphasises that alexithymia and paranoia are
20
related. Alexithymia can easily be assessed and should be considered in studies of
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by East Renfrewshire Education trust and ESRC
grant (ES/J500136/1) that funded A.R. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr
Andrew Hayes for help with the mediation analysis. We also wish to thank the
reviewers for their very helpful comments which have significantly improved our
manuscript.
21
References
Auslander, L. A., & Jeste, D. V. (2002). Perceptions of problems and needs for
service among middle-aged and elderly outpatients with schizophrenia and related
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty item Toronto
Bauermann, T.M., Parker, J.D., & Taylor, G.J. (2008). Sleep problems and sleep
hygiene in young adults with alexithymia. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 45, 318–322.
22
Baglioni, C., Battagliese, G., Feige, B., Spiegelhalder, K., Nissen, C.,
19.
Bell, V., Halligan, P. W., & Ellis, H. D. (2006). The Cardiff anomalous
Buysse, D., Reynolds, W., Monk, T., Berman, S., & Kupfer, D. (1989). The
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.
Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and
22, 939-962.
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C., & Taylor, E. P. (2001). Normative
data for the HADS from a large non‐clinical sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. Psychology,
40, 429-434.
23
Davies, G., Haddock, G., Yung, A. R., Mulligan, L. D., & Kyle, S. D. (2016). A
systematic review of the nature and correlates of sleep disturbance in early psychosis.
D'Souza, D. C., Perry, E., MacDougall, L., Ammerman, Y., Cooper, T., Wu, Y.,
1558−1572.
Freeman, D., & Garety, P.A. (2000). Comments on the content of persecutory
delusions: does the definition need clarification? Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 39, 407-414.
Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Bebbington, E.P. (2002). A
cognitive model of persecutory delusions. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 41, 331 -347.
Freeman, D., Slater, M., Bebbington, P. E., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler,
D., ... Vinayagamoorthy,V. (2003). Can virtual reality be used to investigate persecutory
Freeman, D., Garety, P.A., Bebbington, P.E., Smith, B., Rollinson, R., Fowler,
Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Antley, A., Slater, M., Bebbington, P., Gittins, M.,
Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Vorontsova, N., & Southgate, L. (2009). Insomnia and
24
Freeman, D., Brugha, T., Meltzer, H., Jenkins, R., Stahl, D., & Bebbington, P.
(2010) Persecutory ideation and insomnia: findings from the second British National
Freeman, D., Stahl, D., McManus, S., Meltzer, H., Brugha, T., Wiles, N.,
47, 1195-1203.
Freeman, D., Waite, F., Startup, H., Myers, E., Lister, R., McInerney, J., ... &
Freeman, D., Sheaves, B., Goodwin, G. M., Yu, L. M., Nickless, A., Harrison,
P. J., ... & Hinds, C. (2017). The effects of improving sleep on mental health (OASIS): a
Green, C., Freeman, D., Kuipers, E., Bebbington, P., Fowler, D., Dunn, G.,
Garety, P.A. (2008). Measuring ideas of persecution and reference: the Green et al.
patients with psychosis: A link between insomnia and paranoid ideation? J. Behav.
25
Johns, L.C., Cannon, M., Singleton, N., Murray, R.M., Farrell, M., Brugha, T.,
Kauhanen, J., Kaplan, G. A., Julkunen, J., Wilson, T. W., & Salonen, J. T.
G.H., Balkin, T.J. (2008). Sleep deprivation reduces perceived emotional intelligence
Kimhy, D., Vakhrusheva, J., Jobson-Ahmed, L., Tarrier, N., Malaspina, D., &
Krabbendam, L., Myin-Germeys, I., Hanssen, M., Bijil, R. V., de Graaf, R.,
Levant, R. F., Hall, R. J., Williams, C. M., & Hasan, N. T. (2009). Gender
26
Mollayeva, T., Thurairajah, P., Burton, K., Mollayeva, S., Shapiro, C. M., &
Colantonio, A. (2016). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep
Mulligan, L., Haddock, G., Emsley, R., Neil, S. T., & Kyle, S. (2016). High-
Psychol.
insomnia in patients with persecutory delusions. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psy. 42, 330-336.
Myin-Germeys, I., Oorschot, M., Collip, D., Lataster, J., Delespaul, P., & van
Os, J. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box
Suite.
Reeve, S., Sheaves, B., Freeman, D. (2015). The role of sleep dysfunction in the
Rev.42, 96-115.
Reeve, S., Emsley, R., Sheaves, B., & Freeman, D. (2017). Disrupting Sleep:
27
Sheaves, B., Porcheret, K., Phil, D., Tsanas, A., Espie, C. A., Foster, R. G., ... &
Stopa, L., & Clark, D. (2001). Social phobia: Comments on the viability and
validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the Fear of Negative
van Os, J., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Bijl, R.V., de Graaf, R., Verdoux, H. (2002).
156, 319-327.
van Os, J., Linscott, R.J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., Krabbendam, L.
V an ‘t Wout, M., Alemanc, A., Bermond, B., & Kahn, R.S. (2007). No words
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of
brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc.
West, L. J., Janszen, H. H., Lester, B. K., & Cornelisoon, F. S., Jr. (1962). The
Wilcox, R.R, & Keselman, H.J. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods:
28
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. E. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression
29
Table 2. Spearman rho correlations for study 1.
Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Age
2. PA 0.13*
3. NA -0.12* -0.02
4. HADS- A 0.00 -0.11* 0.47*
5. HADS-D 0.01 -0.29* 0.42* 0.46*
6. PSQI -0.13* -0.23* 0.24* 0.36* 0.35*
7. TAS -0.18* -0.28* 0.27* 0.43* 0.41* 0.33*
8. GPTS -0.13* 0.09 0.28* 0.24* 0.20* 0.19* 0.30*
9. CAPS -0.18* -0.05 0.21* 0.29* 0.25* 0.23* -0.29 0.39*
Abbreviations: PSQI- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PA and NA- Positive and Negative Affect, HADS-A and D Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale respectively, TAS-20 – 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, GPTS- paranoia subscale of the Green Paranoid Thoughts
Scale, CAPS- Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale.
*p <0.05
30
Table 3: Descriptive information of the high and low paranoid
groups for study 1.
Low Paranoia High Paranoia Test Statistic P Value
(n=295) (n=106) (DF)
Mean (SD) Mean(SD)
Gender (men: women) 69:226 24:82 χ2 (1)=0.02 0.49
Age 24.59(8.66) 22.67(6.37) U= 13569 0.04
PSQI 6.11(3.04) 7.81(3.57) U=11073 <.001
PA 24.84(8.08) 24.42(8.39) U=15039 0.56
NA 14.86(5.72) 18.67(7.46) U=10768 <. 001
HADS-A 7.65(3.81) 9.55(3.87) U=11334 <. 001
HADS-D 4.30(3.16) 5.38(3.50) U=12642 <. 001
TAS-20 46.23(11.56) 53.25(9.85) U=10092 <. 001
GPTS 16.60(0.95) 29.60(11.95) U=000 <. 001
CAPS 2.77(3.53) 6.40(6.37) U=9121 <. 001
Abbreviations: PSQI- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PA and NA- Positive and Negative Affect, HADS-A and D Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale respectively, TAS-20 – 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, GPTS- paranoia subscale of the Green
Paranoid Thoughts Scale, CAPS- Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale.
31
Table 4. Logistic Regression of variables that predict Membership of being in the
Paranoid Group in study 1
Abbreviations: PSQI- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PA and NA- Positive and Negative Affect, HADS-A and D
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale respectively, TAS-20 – 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, GPTS- paranoia
subscale of the Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, CAPS- Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale. 2
2
Please note- only significant predictors of paranoia are present in the stepwise model.
32
20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, GPTS- paranoia subscale of the Green Paranoid
Thoughts Scale, CAPS- Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale.
Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Age
2. PA 0.17*
3. NA -0.13* -0.09
4. HADS- A -0.10* -0.17* 0.48*
5. HADS-D 0.00 -0.33* 0.29* 0.47*
6. PSQI -0.07 -0.16* 0.24* 0.38* 0.33*
7. TAS -0.17* -0.22* 0.25* 0.45* 0.51* 0.29*
8. GPTS -0.17* 0.04 0.31* 0.39* 0.26* 0.17* 0.41*
9. CAPS -0.19* -0.02 0.18* 0.29* 0.27* 0.13* -0.26* 0.45*
Abbreviations: PSQI- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PA and NA- Positive and Negative Affect, HADS-A and D Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale respectively, TAS-20 – 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, GPTS- paranoia subscale of the
Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, CAPS- Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale.
*p <0.05
Highlights
Emotional factors meditate the relationship between sleep quality and paranoia
Alexithymia is potentially an important emotion mediator between sleep and
paranoia
Perceptual anomalies also mediate the relationship between sleep and paranoia
Results apply to non-clinical samples and require replication in a clinical sample
33