Electronics - Theory and Practice
Electronics - Theory and Practice
The right of Gerardo Mesias to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in
accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or
storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some
other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in
accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of
a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England
WIT 4LP. Applications for the copyright holder's written permission to reproduce any part of this
publication should be addressed to the publisher
Preface
1 Fundamental theorems
2 Biasing
3 Load lines
4 Transistor modelling
5 Current gain
6 Voltage gain
7 Cascaded systems
8 Bode plots
9 Effect of capacitors
10 High frequency
Index
This book has been written to help you learn how to solve problems in
electronics. Whether studying for BEng, HND or Graduate Diploma, you
need to be able to cope with assignments and face examinations with
confidence.
The basis of this confidence is practice in tackling problems. In solving
a problem in electronics you are trying to express the circuit in
mathematical terms: you are building a mathematical model of the circuit.
The problems in this book, which are the result of long experience of
student?’ needs in tutorial and remedial work, show how this is done.
All the problems are supplied with answers and complete worked
solutions. This is useful because the answer obtained varies according to
the method followed and the approximations made: two different results,
such as 6.94 V and 7.06 V, may both be acceptable answers to a problem.
Some simpler problems can be solved in a number of different ways. This
can be a way of checking your result – by comparing the results by
different methods. You should always arrive at the same result unless
approximations have been made somewhere along the line. If you have
gone wrong, you can check against the solution given in the book: try to
identify exactly where you went wrong and how you can put it right.
The first chapter covers all the main laws and theorems needed to solve
the problems in the following chapters. Each chapter starts with a concise
explanation of the theory, which is followed by graded problems, starting
with simple examples and progressing to the more complicated problems.
The chapters are self-contained, and can be tackled independently in any
order, referring to the first chapter as required for the basic theorems.
This book is intended for your own study. Once you are familiar with it
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
you will find the way of using it that suits you best: in mastering the
fundamental theorems and the different electronics topics, and in preparing
for your examinations.
Ohm’s law
Ohm’s law is given by
V = IR
Some people prefer to use the magic triangle. This is of unknown origin,
but is apparently widely used in secondary education. The magic triangle
can be seen in Figure 1.1. In order to find V in the triangle, you cover V and
you are left with IR. If you want to select another value, you cover the one
you want and get the answer in the uncovered part.
Figure 1.1
Another point that we would like to make is that Ohm’s law does not apply
to a voltage source, nor to a current source. By definition, a 12 V source
will provide any current at 12 V. We can have 12 V and zero current or 12
V and 10 A, but we would not try to find a resistor in this case. Similarly
for a current source. The current source will produce a current at any
voltage. It is important to take this into account when solving problems
Another easier way to understand is to say the sum of the currents going in
are equal to the sum of the currents going out of the node:
∑Iin = ∑Iout
−12V + V1 + V2 + V3 = 0
12V = V1 + V2 + V3
Answer: i2 = 6 A
The sum of the voltages is equal to the sum of the voltage drops in the
left mesh.
10 = 5i1
i1 = 2 A
Answer: 10 V and 5 V
From KVL
Answer: I1 = 3 A, I2 = 1 A and V = 36 V
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
On the 12 Ω branch we can apply Ohm’s law
V = IR = 2 × 12 = 24 V
According to KCL
VAB = 14 − 2I1
12 = 14 − 2I1
−2 = − 2I1
I1 = 1 A
VAB = 20 − I2R
Note the sign of the voltages, given by the rule of polarity. I2 can be
found from KCL
VAB = 20 − 16 × 0.5 = 20 − 8 = 12 V
Then
From KCL
I1 = I3 − I2 = 1.5 − 0.5 = 1 A
Total resistance
RT = R1 + R2 ‖ R3
Ohm’s law
Voltage AB
Ohm’s law
VAB = 5 I2 = 20I3
Therefore
Answer: R = 5Ω
VR = 24 − 9 = 15 V
Answer: R = 50 Ω
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
We can find the total current using Ohm’s law. We know the resistance,
we can calculate the voltage and then the current.
KCL
Answer: −3 A
Figure 1.15
First mesh
Second mesh
V = IR = 5 × 2 = 10 V
60 − 10 = 50 V
We can make a double check by adding both voltages and we should get
the total voltage V, as expected.
The voltage division, although the same problem as before, could appear in
a more complex situation. This is the case in Figure 1.18, where a voltage
source feeds a voltage amplifier. In this example the output voltage vOUT
depends on the input voltage vIN and the amplification A of the amplifier.
The input voltage depends on the value of the voltage source Vs, the
resistance of the voltage source Rs and the internal resistance of the
amplifier RIN.
Figure 1.18
It is reasonable to think that the branch with more resistance will carry less
current. To demonstrate this we start with the fact that R1 and R2 have the
same voltage as they are in parallel.
so
Similarly,
General case
Alternatively, we can look at the general case, that is to say N resistors in
parallel, where we know the total resistance and we want to know the
current going through one particular branch. The circuit in Figure 1.21, is
equivalent to the circuit of Figure 1.22, where the parallel resistors have
been replaced by RP.
Figure 1.21
Figure 1.22
VAB = IT × RP
When we are looking for a particular path, or current divider, we can say
IxRx = ITRP
and
This general case, has to apply to the particular case of two resistors R1 and
R2 in parallel. Let us see if this is true.
If we are looking for I2
Which takes us back to the basic current division rule, for the case of two
resistors in parallel.
We will be using this particular form of current division (two resistors
in parallel), in problems throughout the book. As you will see later, the
current amplification of a transistor is calculated with the aid of the current
division rule, in the input circuit and the output circuit.
Answer:
Voltage division
This problem was done (problem 1.7) using only Ohm’s law and KCL. It
is repeated here using the current division rule.
I1 = 2 A
I1 = 2 A
Answer:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
The 24Ω resistor has 8 V applied to it.
Total current
7 + 2.5 = 9.5Ω
Voltage AB
Voltage division
Current division
Voltage division
Voltage BC
VBC = IR = 2 × 6 = 12V
Current BC
KCL
Voltage AB
Source voltage
Find the voltage at VA, the total current and the branch currents.
6 + 18 = 24Ω
Total current
Answer: R = 28Ω
We can use the current division rule with the following information:
Unknown resistor
Figure 1.35
Value of VTH
There are two possibilities:
(a) We are in the lab and we have the actual circuit in front of us. All we
then need to do is to measure the voltage AB with a suitable meter. The
voltage indicated by the meter is VTH.
(b) More often than not, we will be working on a piece of paper, with a
drawing of the circuit. In this case we use our knowledge of circuit
analysis to calculate the voltage AB of the separated system.
Value of RTH
Having calculated the value of VTH, we need to move on to the value of RTH.
This is more complicated, because we now have to find out the equivalent
resistance of the circuit, excluding the influence of the voltage or current
sources that are part of the system. What we want is the resistance of the
voltage source, without the voltage source, and similarly for a current
(1) Disable all the sources in the circuit. In order to do this you:
• Short circuit the voltage supplies
• Open circuit the current supplies
(2) Measure (if you are in the lab) or calculate (if you are working on
paper), the equivalent resistance between points A and B.
Answer: I = 20A
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Find the value of the current through the 20Ω resistor by converting the
circuit at the left of AB into a Norton equivalent
Answer: I = 4A
When the circuit is separated at A and B, only the left loop remains. We
will calculate the current first and then the voltage at AB which is the
Thevenin voltage.
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.39
With the circuit redrawn, it is easy to find the value of the current
Answer: I3 = 2.25A
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.41
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Answer: I = 0.4A
Thevenin resistance
Thevenin voltage
This is a special case of Thevenin. There is no source of any kind in
VTH = 0
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.46
It has been found that I1 = 20A, I2 = 30A, and I3 is 50A. Verify the value of
I2, by converting the circuit at the left of AB to Thevenin.
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.48
Answer: Yes, I1 = 2A
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.50
Answer: I = 2A
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
RTH = 10‖40 = 8Ω
Answer: R = 2Ω
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Figure 1.54
Find the value of I using the Thevenin equivalent on the left of AB.
Answer: I = 0.25A
VTH = 45 − 20 = 25V
(VB > VA, so VTH is upside-down, and the current is pointing in the right
direction).
Thevenin resistance. (120V supply shorted out to calculate RTH)
Norton’s theorem
This theorem is very similar to Thevenin’s theorem and we will follow the
same approach, so that you can compare the two theorems. Any circuit or
part of a circuit can be replaced by a very simple circuit composed of a
current source, with a resistor in parallel. Figure 1.56 shows a general
circuit, to be converted completely to a Norton equivalent. In order to solve
a problem it might be more practical to convert only part of the circuit into
a Norton equivalent, as we see in Figure 1.57.
Figure 1.56
All we need to do is to find out how we can obtain IN and RN. Before we try
to find IN and RN, we must be very clear which circuit we are converting to
a Norton equivalent. We must clearly identify points A and B of the circuit.
Once we have done this, we can move onto the next step which is to find
the value of IN.
Value of IN
There are two possibilities:
(a) We are in the lab and we have the actual circuit in front of us. In this
case we short circuit points A and B and we measure the short circuit
current with a suitable meter. The reading of the meter is the current IN
that we are looking for.
(b) More often than not, we will be working on a piece of paper with a
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
drawing of the circuit. In this case we use our knowledge of circuit
analysis to calculate the short circuit current through AB, now joined
together in short circuit.
Value of RN
The method of calculating RN is identical to the calculation of RTH. That will
allow us to simplify the explanation and to state the method, as follows:
Answer: 24V
Norton current
Figure 1.59
Find the value of I by converting to Norton the circuit on the left of AB.
Answer: I = 0.4A
The Norton current is found by calculating the total current of the circuit
(with A and B shorted) and then using the current division rule as we
will see,
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Figure 1.61
Total resistance
RT = 40 + 25‖40 = 55.384 6Ω
Total current
Norton resistance
RN = 40 + 25‖40 = 55.384 6Ω
(This is not the same as RT above, but the values are the same as the
circuit is symmetrical.)
Figure 1.62
Find the value of the current through the 20Ω resistor by converting the
circuit at the left of AB into a Norton equivalent
Answer: I = 4A
Right loop
Norton current
IN = I1 + I2 = 20 A
Norton resistance
RN = 61‖30 = 5Ω
Figure 1.65
Norton current
Norton resistance
Figure 1.69
Norton Resistance
RN = 8‖8 + 8 = 12Ω
Figure 1.70
Voltage VC
Answer: Vx = 15V
Norton current
The Norton current is calculated by current division, after finding the
total current of the circuit with A and B shorted together.
Figure 1.72
Answer: I = 2A
Norton current
Norton resistance
RN = 20Ω
Answer: I3 = 3A
Norton current
Norton resistance
RN = 6‖1.5 = 1.2Ω
Answer: Yes
Norton resistance
Figure 1.79
I2 × 4 = 9.8 × 4 = 39.2V
60 + 9.8
Therefore
Answer: Vx = 57.6V
At AB
At CD
Norton resistance
Norton current
This value is difficult to obtain in this case. We need of the help of
the next figure, to solve this problem IN has to flow from A to B. It is not
the case on the left. It is the case on the right and for this we need
Kichhoff’s law.
Figure 1.83
Thevenin–Norton conversions
In certain cases the conversion from Thevenin to Norton and vice versa can
help us to obtain the solution to a problem.
A typical case is illustrated in Figure 1.85. This type of problem can be
solved by mesh analysis, nodal analysis or by calculating the total
impedance, total current, etc. Any of these methods will be quite
complicated. The last method mentioned would be straightforward if it
were not for the capacitor on the right-hand side. With the capacitor we
will have imaginary and complex numbers to contend with.
Figure 1.85
The resistors, when in parallel, can be combined and the series resistors
added, but in Figure 1.86, have been left without combining to show the
method of working the problem.
A useful though unexpected fact is that the resistance for a Norton to
Thevenin or Thevenin to Norton, is the same, as shown in Figure 1.87, the
resistor is 10Ω in one case and also in the other. Remember that to calculate
the impedance in Norton or Thevenin we disable the supplies. That is to
say, we short the voltage supply and open-circuit the current source. So, in
both cases we end up with 10Ω.
Figure 1.87
The only part now left, is how to calculate the value of the voltage source
when we go from a Norton to a Thevenin equivalent. We now use Figure
1.89.
Figure 1.89
VTH = INR
There are several problems that will be solved by this technique in future
chapters. You need to master it well in the examples that follow.
Thevenin voltage
VTH = 4 × 10 = 40V
Thevenin resistance
RTH = IN = 4Ω
Answer: VX = 40V
Norton resistance
RN = RTH = 5Ω
Norton current
Total current
10 + 3 = 13A
Voltage
Answer: VX = 96V
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Left - hand side
Norton current
Norton resistance
RN = 60Ω
Norton current
Norton resistance
RN = 24Ω
Total current
5 + 3 = 8A
Total resistance
60‖40‖24 = 12Ω
VX = IR = (5 + 3)12 = 8 × 12 = 96 V
Answer: 100V
RT = 6‖2‖4 = 1.090 9Ω
Voltage
Answer: I3 = 1A
Norton current
Norton resistance
RN = 3Ω
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
Answer: I2 = 5A
There is only one Thevenin circuit, the 135V source with the 5Ω resistor,
we convert this one.
Answer: I2 = −1A
Thevenin to Norton
Norton to Thevenin
Because the direction is opposite to the one above, we must call it −1A.
Answer: 0.8A
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
RTH = 1.6Ω
Thevenin
Norton
Therefore I2 = 2A is alright.
Answer: Yes
Answer: I = 4A
Thevenin voltage
VTH = 8 × 5 = 40V
Thevenin resistance
RTH = 5Ω
Thevenin voltage
Thevenin resistance
RTH = 10Ω
Superposition
Superposition is a very useful technique to solve complicated problems. We
will certainly use it in the solution of operational-amplifier (Op–Amp)
problems, where there is more than one input.
If the system has two inputs, you can consider the output of the system
when one input is ‘reduced to zero’, leaving only the other input to produce
an output.
Then you ‘reduce to zero’ the other input and consider the output with
only the input that was ‘reduced to zero’ in the first place.
The total output is given by the sum of the two outputs:
V0 = V01 + V02
First case
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Figure 1.121
Total resistance
Currents
Second case
Figure 1.122
Currents
Total resistance
Currents
Total values
I1 = 3.5 − 1.5 = 2A
I2 = −0.875 + 1.875 = 1A
I3 = 2.625 + 0.375 = 3A
Answer: Yes
Case a)
Total resistance
RT = 36‖12 + 36 = 9 + 36 = 45Ω
Figure 1.126
Result
I1 = −1.2 + 3.2 = 2A
I2 = −0.8 + 4.8 = 4A
I3 = 2.4 + 3.6 = 6A
The value of currents are: I1 = 6A, I2 = −1A and I3 = 5A. Verify this using
superposition.
Answer: Yes
Case a)
Figure 1.129
Total resistance
Total resistance
Result:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
I1 = 7.077 − 1.077 = 6A
I2 = −5.31 + 4.31 = −1A
I3 = 1.77 + 3.23 = 5A
Using superposition find the value of the voltage at VX. Calculate the
current flowing through the 4Ω resistor first.
Answer: VX = 96V
Case a)
Figure 1.132
Total resistance
Total resistance
Result
Answer: VX = 72V
Case a)
Figure 1.135
Current
Case b)
Figure 1.136
Result
Using superposition to find VX. Find the current through the middle
branch first.
Answer: VX = 72V
Case a)
Figure 1.138
Current (both resistors being of the same value, the current is half the
value of the generator).
Case b)
Figure 1.139
Current
Total
I = 1 + 0.5 = 1.5A
VX = 1.5 × 48 = 72V
Total resistance
Currents
Case b)
Figure 1.142
Currents
Result
Case a)
Figure 1.144
Case b)
Figure 1.145
Currents
Answer: I = 4A
Case a)
Figure 1.147
Case b)
Figure 1.148
Current
Result
I = 2 + 2 = 4A
Answer: I = 6A
Case a)
Figure 1.150
Resistance
RT = 24 + 36‖12 = 24 + 9 = 33Ω
Current
Case b)
Figure 1.151
Current
Total:
I = 2.545 4 + 3.454 5 = 6A
Nodal analysis
Nodal analysis is a direct application of Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL). It is
based on the fact that at a node or a junction point, the sum of the currents
is equal to zero.
According to what we said before, currents going into a node are
considered positive and currents going out are considered negative. A
simple example is illustrated in Figure 1.152. In order to solve this problem
we first indicate the nodes in the drawing. We have three nodes in the
upper part, with one reference node at the bottom. Secondly we assume
some voltages at the nodes, say, V1, V2 and V3 for nodes A, B and C,
respectively. Thirdly, we assign the currents, that is to say we give them
names and directions. In the circuit shown in Figure 1.153, the currents
have the same number as the resistor where they circulate, but this is
purely accidental, you could use any numbers that you want.
Figure 1.152
The sense of the current is not important at this stage, you can make an
intelligent guess, but the important consideration, is to give a direction and
then stick to it. If the sense of the current is not in the same sense as in
reality, then you will get a minus sign in the result for this particular
current.
Node A
I0 − I1 − I2 = 0
Node B
I2 − I3 − I4 = 0
Node C
I6 − I4 − I5 = 0
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Please note that this equation is true because it corresponds to the direction
in Figure 1.153. If we change the direction of any current, then the equation
will change the sign for that particular current.
The next stage is to replace the currents by their equivalent in voltages
and resistances according to Ohm’s law.
Node A
Node B
Node C
In this case we know the current sources I0 and I6. We also know the
resistors. The unknowns are V1, V2 and V3. As we have three unknowns and
three equations, we can solve the problem.
Currents
Currents
Node B
The sum of the currents into the node are equal to the sum of the
currents out of the node.
Node A
Node B
There are two equations and two unknowns. We can solve it Multiplied
by 120.
Node A
and finally
Answer: VX = 40V
Answer: VX = 96V
42 − 2VY + VX = 0
42 − 132V + VX = 0
−90 + VX = 0 VX = 90V
Current
Mesh analysis
Mesh analysis is a direct application of Kirchhoff’s voltage law (KVL).
Mesh analysis comes in handy in the derivation of a transistor model (more
of that in Chapter 4). It is based on the fact that the sum of the voltages
around a closed loop is equal to zero. A typical circuit is shown in Figure
1.165.
Figure 1.165
First of all we identify, arbitrarily, the sense of the currents in the different
meshes. This is not a triviality, but as we saw at the beginning, the sense of
the current dictates the sense of the voltage that appears in the resistors.
The chosen direction for currents can be seen in Figure 1.166. From the
author’s experience, students prefer to use a modified KVL, but still a KVL,
that is to say:
Figure 1.166
NOTE: If the voltage source in the loop is against the sense of the
current in that loop, as it is the case in the third loop, then the value of
the voltage source is written as negative.
Mesh 2
Mesh 3
Mesh 2
This is more presentable and looks better. It can easily be transferred into
matrix notation. Matrix notation is only an abbreviated form of writing the
equation, but we are not interested in matrices at this moment.
Mesh 1
Answer: I1 = 3A and I2 = 4A
Mesh 1
Mesh 2
9 = 3I1 I1 = 3A
11 = −9 + 5I2
20 = 5I2 I2 = 4A
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
PROBLEM 1.80 MESH ANALYSIS
Figure 1.169
Mesh 1
Answer: 96V
Mesh equation
40 = I1(2 + 8) − I28
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
0 = −8I1 + I2(8 + 6 + 6) − 6I3
−20 = −I26 + I3(6 + 4)
Having established from mesh analysis the values of I1, I2 and I3, it easy
to verify these values.
At node A for instance VA is given by
4 − 2 × 5.6 = 28.8V
VB is also equal to
Mesh equations
Rearranged
Replace I3 in (2)
Mesh equations
Find I1 and I2
I3 = 3A
Mesh 1
3 = 3I2 I2 = 1A
−2 = −5I1 + 7
5I1 = 9 I1 = 1.8A
Mesh 2
Mesh 3
I1 = 6I1 −10
I1 and I3 are known, 26A and 14A sources. We can make an equation for
I2.
Mesh 2
Note that the sign of I3, positive as I3 and I2 have the same direction in
0 = 11I2 − 130 + 42
11I2 = 88 I2 = 8A
Currents
IX = I1 − I2 = 26 − 8 = 18A
IY = I2 − I3 = 8 + 14 = 22A
Miller’s theorem
Miller’s theorem states that a given impedance can be replaced by two
equivalent impedances. In order to illustrate this we refer to Figure 1.179,
where if the behaviour of the circuits is the same, then the circuits are
equivalent.
Figure 1.179
NOTE
Because of the negative sign that will appear in the formula, the Miller
theorem only works on an inverting amplifier and it becomes
meaningless otherwise.
We factorise V1:
I1 = Y1V1
then
V1 = Y(1 − Av)
I2 = V2Y2
V2 can be simplified
rearranging
replacing
rearranging
Y2 ≈ Y and R2 ≈ R
Input side
Output side
Figure 1.181
Answer: CA = 602pF
Answer: Av = −119
The amplification is
Find the value of the input capacitance of the amplifier and the value of
amplification that would give an input capacitance of 0.
Input capacitance
At node A
Miller
Input resistance
The new circuit is shown in Figure 1.191. Note that we are using
impedances now. The formula was developed for admittances.
Figure 1.191
Replacing
Therefore
NOTE: Use absolute value if you are not interested in the sign.
If the circuit is more complicated and it includes RE, then the loop is
extended to include this new voltage drop which would be IERE.
The rest of the values such as IC and the other voltages can be
calculated after finding the value of IB using the β factor.
We apply KVL:
but
IC = βIB
VCC − VBE = IB[(β + 1)RC + RF]
Approximate method
See Figure 2.5. This method assumes that the transistor has no effect on the
potential divider. Therefore we can calculate
Figure 2.5
Then we calculate VE
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
And finally IE
If this is true we use the approximate method, if not we use the Thevenin
method.
Figure 2.8
First of all we need to find the points A and B through which we are going
to separate part of the transistor circuit to be converted into a Thevenin
equivalent.
As VCC would get in the way of this separation, we have Figure 2.7
where we have separated the supplies in a totally equivalent circuit, but a
circuit where it is easier to find the points A and B. We can even separate it
with a pair of scissors, without cutting VCC.
In Figure 2.8 the left of AB is transformed to the Thevenin equivalent.
We calculate VTH as a potential divider, then we calculate RTH. Remember
that we have to ‘reduce to zero’ the sources in the circuit. That is why we
have the dotted line shorting the power supply in Figure 2.8. The value of
RTH is then, R1 and R2 in parallel.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
In Figure 2.9, we show the circuit with the Thevenin equivalent in
place. We have only shown half of the transistor as IB does not use the top
part. In this way we concentrate our attention on what really matters.
We also bring to your attention the idea of the reflected value of RE. We
simply assume that RE has a current of IB, instead of the real IE which is
much larger. Then to compensate for this assumption, we just multiply RE
by (β + 1). This will get us to the solution more quickly. You might prefer a
more mathematical approach, but this is commonly accepted in electronics.
Emitter current
KVL
Answer: 2k75 Ω
KVL
KVL
Answer: 66k25 Ω
KVL
but
Answer: 736 kΩ
Answer: 2.88 V
KVL
For 0 V input
VE = 2 − 0.7 = 1.3 V
We had calculated 3.39 mA. There is a small difference here that needs
explaining. The value of IE is 3.424 242.… Using this value, instead of the
one we used, we get VCE = 7.615 V. 4.88 V is revised to 5.085 V and then
the check is the correot 3.39 mA for IC. Bear this in mind in the future.
Answer: 4 V
therefore
Figure 2.25
Answer: 1%
Approximate method
Thevenin method
Figure 2.27
Answer: 1714 Ω
Answer: 64.54
Approximate method
Figure 2.35
The load lines, similarly, present a visual form of what is happening with
the transistor with no AC signal and, most important of all, we can see how
much the AC signal can swing, before it hits the limits.
This last equation assumes that IC = IE. This simplifies your life and mine.
These two points can be joined by a straight line which is the DC load line.
DC load line
The resistors R1 and R2, in Figure 3.4, will ensure that the transistor
operating point is located at one point only along this line.
In Figure 3.4, the base voltage VB is given by
Figure 3.4
VE = VB − 0.7
So:
In this way, we obtain the Q point in the straight line (see Figure 3.5). Q is
short for quiescent, which is the situation of the transistor when it has DC
power but no AC signal.
Figure 3.5
two points
one point and the slope
y = mx + c
Two points
See the example shown in Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6
y − Y1 = m(x − X1)
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
So:
y − 2 = −2(x − 3)
y = −2x + 6 + 2
y = −2x + 8
We will be using this second method in the calculation of the AC load line.
AC load line
We now move onto the AC load line. We consider Figure 3.8. Now that we
are considering an AC signal, the capacitors play an important role. C1 and
C2 let the AC signal through, but block the DC supplies. CE bypasses the
resistor RE. This results in less resistance for the current. The current will be
higher for a given voltage, when RE is bypassed by CE, and the slope will be
higher.
Figure 3.8
y − Y1 = m(x − X1)
Having this equation it is quite easy to find the the points where the
straight line crosses the x and y axes:
For VCE = 0 we have
For ic = 0 we have
For AC
iCMAX = 2ICQ
This is also part of the AC load line. We can replace ICQ in equation (7) for
its value from equation (8):
VCEQ = ICQRAC
Equations (9) and (10) are very useful in dealing with problems of
maximum equal swing as you will see in the following examples.
Find the maximum value of Vs to give the maximum swing on the 1k2
resistor.
Amplification
2 × 2.27 = 4.54 V
voltage at base is
We have
Figure 3.13
Answer: 9.12 V
The AC model is
Figure 3.16
Maximum values
AC values
Maximum swing
2 − 4.56 = 9.12 V
Figure 3.19
Answer: 6.592 V
AC
Answer: 7.68 V
or
NOTE: As seen in Figure 3.9 the right hand position of the Q point is
ICQRAC which this case is 5.074 V. The left hand side of the Q point is
VCEQ which in this case is 3.84 V.
The signal will swing to both sides of the Q point. That is why the
maximum swing is either 10.148 V or 7.68 V.
We have to choose the smaller of the two because the signal as it gets
bigger and bigger, will reach the smaller value first, at one end. From
then on, the signal will be clipped and that is not acceptable.
AC
Figure 3.24
Draw the load lines and find the maximum swing on the load.
Approximate method
AC
Figure 3.26
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Maximum swing = 3.74 × 2 = 7.48 V
Figure 3.28
Sketch the load lines and find IB, IC, RAC and RDC.
AC
Answer: 12.5 V
If R1 is 10 kΩ, then
Draw the load lines and find the maximum swing on the load.
Answer: 7.1 V
Approximate method
AC conditions
Figure 3.35
DC
Figure 3.36
10R1 vs βRE
47k vs 33k
Therefore, use Thevenin method
Figure 3.38
AC
(Assuming IC ≈ IE)
Plotting values
DC
AC
= 2 × 6 × 0.48 = 2 × 2.88
= 5.76 V
Draw the load lines, and find the maximum swing on the load.
Answer: 52 V
AC
Plotting values
DC
Figure 3.45
The location of Q in the DC load line can be moved by varying RB. This
in turn varies IB which, in turn, varies IC, We have worked the example
to achieve maximum optimum equal swing, The values of 3.93 and 3.94
should be the same. The difference is due to rounding off in the
calculation.
Plotting values
DC
Answer: 609 kΩ
Figure 3.50
Maximum points
DC
Maximum points
AC
The balance criteria used before to decide between the Thevenin and the
approximate method was
10R1 = βRE
10R1 = 1.5βRE
This new criteria will allow us to find the value of R1, making the
solution of the problem easier.
Solving the problem, we will arrive at the ratioR1:R2, but not at
individual values. The above criteria reduces the problem.
The transistor works with two types of signals, the DC signal and the AC
signal.
The DC signal sets up the transistor at a convenient point within the
working region, which is known as the quiescent point or simply the Q
point. The AC signal works on top of the DC signal, but it is not
superimposed. The AC signal follows a different path from the DC signal,
as there are places where the AC signal can go, which are not accessible to
the DC.
Because of this, it is better to completely separate the DC conditions
which we call biasing, from the AC conditions which we call small signal
conditions.
The DC analysis is straightforward and requires only a knowledge of
circuit analysis, Ohm’s law and Kirchhoff’s laws. For the AC analysis we
need two more steps:
Transistor models
Small signal models
Transistor model
In order to find out how we get a model of a transistor it is best to observe
the following procedure from a general study of two-port networks in the
order given:
From mesh analysis we know that any passive network can be represented
by the following equations
V1 = I1Z11 + I2Z12
V2 = I1Z21 + I2Z22
All we now need to do is to find the values of Z11, Z12, Z21 and Z22.
Before we do that, we can relate the previous equation to an equivalent
circuit, term by term. In Figure 4.2, Z11 is an impedance that produces a
voltage I1Z11. Z12I2 is a current-dependent voltage generator. A voltage is
produced in circuit 1 due to the current in circuit 2 and it is proportional to
the current in circuit 2. We can now write:
Figure 4.2
Similarly it can be found that the second part of the circuit corresponds to
the second equation, i.e.
V2 = I1Z21 + I2Z22
Now that we have found this equivalent circuit, which is of the Thevenin
type, we can go further to try to find the values of Z11, Z12, Z21 and Z22.
In order to do this, we open circuit one of the terminals. Let us say that
we make I2 = 0. Because of this, the first equation will become:
V1 = I1Z11 (as I2 = 0)
so
V2 = I1Z21
so
V1 = I2Z12 (as I1 = 0)
so
V2 = I2Z22
so
Because we have made the currents equal to zero by an open circuit to the
terminal, the Z parameters are called open circuit parameters.
A similar definition of the two-port network can be carried out with the
Y parameters. We are still far from the transistor model, but are getting
nearer.
I1 = V1Y11 + V2Y12
I2 = V1Y21 + V2Y22
We need to find the values of Y11, Y12, Y21 and Y22. This can easily be done if
we first identify a circuit that can represent the above equation.
In Figure 4.4, Y11 is an admittance and the current going through it is
V1Y11. V2Y12 is a voltage-dependent current generator. The equation is of the
type Ia = Ib + Ic
Figure 4.4
I1 = V1Y11 + V2Y12
I2 = V1Y21 + V2Y22
With the use of this equivalent circuit which is of the Norton type, we can
go further to try to obtain the values of Y11, Y12, Y21 and Y22. In order to do
this we short-circuit one of the terminals. Let us say V2 = 0. The first
equation then becomes:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
I1 = V1Y11
I1 = V1Y11
so
I2 = V1Y21
so
V1 = 0
I1 = V2Y12
so
I2 = V2Y22
Hybrid parameters
We now repeat the general drawing Figure 4.5 of a passive network.
Figure 4.5
Using a mixture of current and voltages, hence the name hybrid, we can
define a new set of equations:
V1 = h11I1 + h12V2
I2 = h21I1 + h22V2
Analysing the first equation we see that on the left-hand side of the equals
sign we have volts, then both terms on the right of the equal sign must also
be of the dimension of volts. In order to achieve this, h11 has to be of ohm
dimensions and h12 has to be dimensionless. In the second equation h21 is
dimensionless whereas h22 has the dimension of Siemens (i.e. ohm−1).
The above equation can also be written in matrix form:
All we now need is to use the symbols used in the transistor to have the
transistor model. We redraw the circuit in Figure 4.7, with the
nomenclature of a common emitter circuit. In Figure 4.7, the letters follow
the following abreviations:
Figure 4.7
hi input
hr reverse transfer voltage ratio
hf forward transfer current ratio
ho output
Figure 4.9
Small signals
Due to the amplification of the transistor, a small signal at the input, will
create a similar but larger signal at the output. If the input is sufficiently
small, the output will neither go into saturation nor cut–off.
The transistor is said to be working in the active region. It is also said
Digital operation
The above section described the transistor as an amplifier. We can also use
the transistor in a digital form, i.e., on and off, just like a switch. In this
case the active region is of no use to us. In this mode of operation we
specifically require the transistor to go from saturation to cut-off and vice
versa. Digital operation is not within the scope of this book.
Circuit transformations
The transistor works with two types of signals, both are required at the
same time. They perform different tasks and they follow different rules in
their operation. We are referring to the DC signal or biasing on the one
hand, and the AC signal on the other.
It is also important to realise that we are not talking about
superposition, for DC and AC signals. Cause and effect can be added in
superposition to obtain the resulting effect. In circuit transformations, the
AC signal follows a different circuit to that of the DC, resulting in a
complex system of two different operations in a single circuit.
The concept of two signals operating together to control the operation
of the transistor is difficult to imagine and also difficult to explain even if
you are experienced. Experiments performed in the laboratory where you
can check your theoretical knowledge against practical results help
considerably in understanding the operation. Fortunately, we can treat the
signals separately and this appears to be a convenient way of solving the
problem.
The DC conditions were tackled under biasing and this is
straightforward. There are no complications, only some basic rules such as
Ohm’s law, Kirchhoff’s law, and other theorems that you are familiar with
and can be revised, if necessary, in the first chapter of this book.
The AC conditions, are more complicated to understand, because under
AC conditions there are extra paths for the AC signal and the circuit
changes quite a lot. When we move to AC conditions, we put DC
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
conditions to one side, in the knowledge that the transistor will be properly
biased.
In AC conditions, as the AC signal follows a different path to that of
the DC circuit, we can redraw the circuit to make it easier for us to see
what is happening and to apply the laws and rules of circuit analysis. The
step of redrawing the circuit for AC conditions is very important in solving
a problem. You must also remember that different circuits will have
different models and therefore different equations. Don’t use a formula if
you don’t know exactly which circuit it applies to.
There are two important factors in transforming a circuit:
Following these two points, we can modify the circuit, in order to make it
easier to analyse. We are trying to solve the problems presented by a
transistor amplifier. With the modified circuit, we are a step nearer to
solving these problems.
All we then need to do is to set the equation that corresponds to the
modified circuit. The rest is just mathematics to get the final result.
We are now ready to analyse the circuit transformations – under AC
conditions only – of three typical examples, each with a sequence of three
diagrams.
The first circuit to be transformed is a very simple common emitter
circuit as shown in Figure 4.12. We have RB in the input circuit and RC in
the output circuit. We can clearly see two circuits with a transistor in the
middle.
Figure 4.12
iE = iB (β + 1)
There are now two equations and two unknowns, which means that we
can solve the problem.
The reflected value method, however, represents a short cut to the set
of equations, is user friendly and well established in electronic circles.
You might have noticed that we haven’t used the transistor model in
this final example. The equivalent circuit is not required in this case as
there are no components in the collector side of the transistor which is only
useful to provide a return path for the emitter current.
Little re model
Little re is the emitter resistance inside the emitter. This is an imaginary
resistance which can be justified as there is a voltage on the base of the
transistor and a current flowing through the emitter. This is seen in Figure
4.15.
Figure 4.15
where
Because of this high value we can simplify the circuit by eliminating RB’C.
We obtain the circuit shown in Figure 4.20. The second simplification
comes from using Miller’s theorem in the circuit of Figure 4.20.
Figure 4.20
Reflected value of re
Thevenin–Norton conversions
Transistor modelling
Current division rule
Small signals equivalent circuits
That is to say the current amplification is the ratio of the output current to
the input current. The input current comes from the source, through the
first coupling capacitor, as this is an AC signal. The output current goes
through the second coupling capacitor and through resistor RL, the load
resistor.
In Figure 5.2, we see the transformation of the standard circuit into the
AC model, which in this figure shows only the input side. At first it is
difficult to recognise that these circuits are all equivalent and correspond to
the input circuit of Figure 5.1. For this reason we will briefly mention the
differences.
Figure 5.2
Now, let us look at the output circuit, in Figure 5.3. The resistor RE has
disappeared due to the effect of CE the bypass capacitor, which has an
enormous effect on the feedback and stability of the circuit.
Figure 5.3
Using the approximate method for DC conditions, find the current gain
Ai of the transistor.
Answer: Ai = 78
Answer: Ai = 66.12
Answer: Ai = −23.59
Approximate method
Answer: Ai = −5.06
Approximate method
Use the Thevenin method to evaluate DC conditions and find the value
of Ai.
Answer: Ai = 59.3
Figure 5.13
Answer: RL = 7181 Ω
Answer: Ai = −32.79
Thevenin
Figure 5.19
Answer: 6.46 μA, 6.44 μA, 6.44 μA, 0.119 mA, 525 μA, and 0.26 V,
respectively
Answer: Ai = 0.403
AC conditions
Figure 5.23
Answer: Ai = 2.462
Figure 5.25
Answer: A = −65.34
10R1 vs βRE
68 000 52 650
Therefore, use Thevenin.
Figure 5.27
Answer: Ai = −0.954
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
AC Model
Figure 5.30
Answer: Ai = −64.8
AC model
Figure 5.33
Answer: Ai = −31.3
Figure 5.35
hie = 1500 Ω
hfe = 99
hre = 5 × 10−4
hoe = 25 μS
The collector resistance is 3kΩ. Sketch a small signal model and find the
current gain, Ai.
Answer: Ai = −92.1
Figure 5.37
Answer: Ai = −688
Answer: = 123.6 mA
Approximate method
Answer: iL = −4.17 mA
10R1 vs βRE
120k vs 360k
therefore, use approximate method
AC Model
Answer: iL = −0.561 mA
AC model
Figure 5.45
Figure 5.47
Full bypass
Partial bypass
• Using DC conditions evaluate the currents. With IE, using the little re
model equation, calculate ie.
• Using the modelling, transform the circuit to AC conditions and work
out the voltages. The ratio vo/vi is the voltage amplification.
Figure 6.2, shows the primary of the transistor, or the input side. The
capacitor CE bypasses RE and this will not show anywhere. The three
resistors R1, R2 and re(β + 1) can be joined into one. We then obtain the
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
simple circuit of Figure 6.3.
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.3
R3 represent the three resistors together. We now see that the base
voltage vB is given by the potential divider rule:
vbase = iEre
vout = iC(RC ‖ RL)
• so
This equation is only valid for the circuit of Figure 6.1, which is under
consideration.
However, in AC conditions:
Emitter follower
The relevant part of an emitter follower circuit is shown in Figure 6.6. In
this case the input voltage vB is applied to the base of the transistor. The
output voltage is taken from the emitter. Under AC conditions, the
capacitor is conducting so the output RL is in parallel with RE.
Figure 6.6
Answer: −2 V
Figure 6.12
Answer: Av = −240
Figure 6.16
(re + RE) × (β + 1)
(13.07 + 1000) × 101 = 102320
Approximate method
AC conditions
Figure 6.20
Approximate method
DC conditions
Figure 6.24
NOTE: This is the solution at 30°C. You can verify the results for 20°C.
a) as shown
b) with bypass capacitor
Figure 6.27
Transistor gain
Answer: Av = −91.92
Figure 6.31
Answer: −61.93
Answer: Av = −79
Approximate method
Answer: Av = −113.72
We can identify the following parts and therefore this will be the
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
method to follow
DC conditions
These are applicable to stage 1 and stage 2. There are two methods to
evaluate the DC conditions. The approximate method and the Thevenin
method. It should be noted that the Thevenin method to evaluate DC
conditions on a potential divider biasing is the application of the Thevenin
theorem to this particular circuit.
We also have a criteria to decide whether to use one or the other
method. The criteria consists on comparing RB1 with RE in the following
way.
If 10RB1 < βRE use the approximate method
Using either method we will eventually arrive at IB, IC and IE. With the
value of IE we can obtain the value of re. It is also a good idea at this point
to continue to obtain the input impedances of both stages, as they may be
required later.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
The circuit to be analysed will most likely be different and it must be
clearly understood that the model that will follow is the model that
corresponds to the circuit of Figure 7.1. So, when you do the equivalent
circuit keep your eyes on your particular circuit. Our equivalent circuit is
shown in Figure 7.2. This part will form a potential divider and the
amplification will have a factor less than 1, from this part.
Figure 7.2
Care has to be taken to make sure that the emitter circuit is properly
included, if it is not bypassed by a capacitor and also amplified by the
factor (β + 1).
The most complicated part is the gain of the first stage, from base one
to base two. The complication is that part of the loading of the first stage is
the input of the second stage. So there are a lot of items to be considered as
part of the equation.
The general equation is:
We see this in Figure 7.3. In this circuit we have the collector resistor of
stage 1, plus all the input resistances on stage 2. The circuit on the emitter
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
of stage 2 is very important. In this case REB1 is bypassed and it will not
show.
Figure 7.3
If 10RB1 < βRE we use the approximate method. Otherwise, we use the
Thevenin method.
Using the method decided by the criterion we can find the value of IE in
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
each of the stages independently. With the value of IE we can find the value
of re according to the following alternatives:
The current out of the transistor 1 into the second stage is:
iIN2 = β1iB1
The current coming out of the first stage will follow the equivalent circuit
shown in Figure 7.7. Again we use the current division rule.
Figure 7.7
From the base of the second transistor we can move to the output of the
second transistor using the β factor.
iC2 = iB2β2
The circuit that we have now is shown in Figure 7.8. In this case we have
the last application of the current division rule:
Figure 7.8
It is best not to try to remember formulae of this type. It is best to work out
the model from the circuit and work out the formulae from your model.
If we want to relate the current amplification to the voltage
amplification, we can use the gain impedance formula:
For those of you that like anagrams note that the word RAIL should appear
at one side of the equation. You can resort to this mnemonic rule if you
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
don’t remember where the resistors go in the formula. Again RL is easily
identified. Note that if RL is not present, then the ouput current would
circulate only in RC2 and iL would be identical with iC2.
Let us work out RIN. In this case we look at Figure 7.9. The value of RIN
to be used in the gain impedance formula will be:
Figure 7.9
DC conditions
Criteria
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
10R1 vs βRE Use
10 000 24 000 Approx.
20 000 21 600 Approx.
Stage 1
Stage 2
AC conditions:
Figure 7.11
Current gain
Input side, current division
Find the voltage amplification and the current amplification for the
above circuit.
DC conditions
Criteria
10R1 vs βRE Use
390 000 309 600 Thevenin
220 000 170 400 Thevenin
Thevenin resistance
Thevenin voltage
Figure 7.15
For the cascade amplifier, find the input resistances as shown, the
voltage amplification and the current amplification.
DC conditions
Criteria
10R1 vs βRE Use
100 000 120 000 Approx.
Approximate method
Figure 7.22
Av = 94.073×32.967 = 3101
Output side
Figure 7.25
For the cascade amplifier, find the resistances as shown, the voltage
amplification and the current amplification. Assume the temperature to
be 20°C.
DC conditions
Criteria
10R1 vs βRE
56 000 67 000
re2 = 12.5 Ω
AC conditions
With both emitter resistors bypassed, we have
Total
Av = 8408
The gain impedance formula gave 4456, which is not too bad,
considering all the rounding-off.
DC conditions
Criteria
10R1 vs βRE Use
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
200 000 84 000 Thevenin
Thevenin
Figure 7.31
AC conditions – impedances
Figure 7.32
Total
Current gain
Figure 7.33
Answer: Av = 107
Voltage gain
Total
Av =8.06×13.28 = 107
Find the current gain and the voltage gain of the amplifiers.
Thevenin
Second stage
Total
Av = −0.977×1.2 = −1.197
Find the voltage gain. Calculate the voltage output if the Input is fed
with a source of 2 mV peak to peak with an output resistance of 600 Ω.
Resistances
Voltage gain
Total
Av = 47.5×114.74 = 5450
Answer: Av = −261
Second stage
KVL
Voltage gain
Total
Answer: 345
Total
Answer: Ai = −2997
Answer: Av = 2891
Total
Figure 7.56
AC model
Figure 7.57
Voltage gain
Total gain
Answer: Av = 4349
Second stage
Total
Answer: Ai = 1716
Transistor 1, output
Figure 7.64
Answer: 11 184
Voltage gain
Total
Answer: Av = −70.3
DC conditions
RE1 is in parallel with the reflected value of re2 Potential divider at input
Answer: Av = 273.32
Figure 7.69
With the help of this simple circuit we can define the transfer function.
The transfer function is the ratio between the output and the input. In this
simple example the circuit is a potential divider and this will be shown in
the transfer function.
In general the transfer function of any passive network will be of the form
With reference to the simple quadratic equation we can say that if X1 and
X2 are the solutions of a quadratic equation, then (X − X1)(X − X2) = 0 is the
equation.
Example
X2 − 7X + 12 = 0
(X − 3)(X − 4) = 0
3 and 4 are the solutions of the equation. Similarly, in the general equation,
Z is a zero value, that is to say, a value that will make the top term equal to
zero.
P is a pole, that is to say a value that will make the denominator equal
to zero. Zeroes and poles are the solution of the transfer function and it can
be plotted in a system of coordinates.
In frequency response we are interested in the magnitude of the
function and in the phase angle at a given frequency. The magnitude is
given by
The first form F(s) = K, is only a constant. As such it is not affected by the
frequency. That is to say, its value will not change with a change in the
frequency. It will, however, affect the magnitude of the function. It can be
argued whether or not this is a Bode form. We don’t mind, but we will
concentrate on the four types of Bode forms, types A to D. The four
different types are shown in Figure 8.2.
Figure 8.2
So far, we have seen type A and type B. They are both straightforward.
The magnitude plot is a straight line going up for one, down for the other
and crossing the zero line at one point.
Slope
An interesting part of this representation is that the slope of the line in type
A is 20 dB per decade, whereas in type B it is −20 dB per decade. Some
authors refer to it as 6 dB per octave.
Let us see where these values come from. The representation of Bode
plots is done on log–log paper. That is to say, we represent the frequency in
a log scale and the magnitude in decibels.
An octave from music is the distance between two notes where one is
twice the frequency of the other
A = 20 log 2
= 20 × 0.30103
= 6.0206 dB 6 dB per octave is an approximation.
A = 20 log 10
= 20 × 1
= 20 dB 20 dB per decade is an exact value.
Using a slope of 20 dB per decade means that we can easily construct the
plots. All we need to know is the point where they cross the ω axis. We can
then draw the straight line up for type A, or down for type B, with a slope
of ±20 dB per decade.
As we saw in Figure 8.2, type C and type D have a bent line. The point
where the line bends is called the corner frequency or break frequency.
As you probably suspect by now, type C and type D are very much
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
related. We will only consider type C in detail, but by extension you will
find type D.
Type C
We would start with something like:
j25ω + 75
with suitable factorising and normalising we obtain the basic form which
is:
H(ω) = jω + 1
As ω → 0, | H(ω) | → 1 A → 0 db
As ω → ∞, | H(ω) | → ω A → ∞
The imaginary part is equal to the real part. The line changes direction and
we have the corner, or break frequency.
For the magnitude plot of the type C function, all we need to do is to
find the corner frequency. The left-hand side of this is a straight line at 0
dB level. To the right of this we have a straight line at 20 dB per decade.
In Figure 8.5, if ω increases, the real part will still be 1, as before, but
the imaginary part will grow. The angle that was 45° will be larger. As ω
increases, the angle will become larger and larger, but the limit will be 90°.
Figure 8.5
We can now see the three alternatives for the type C function. You can
work out the type D which is very similar, but with a negative angle.
Just to clarify matters at this stage we show Figure 8.6. We can see the
angle plot for a type C and type D. CF stands for the corner frequency.
Figure 8.6
This logarithmic transformation of products into sums means that you can
do the individual components separately and join them in a graphical sum
to obtain the total response. The same technique can be applied to angles.
You plot individual angles of each factor and add them (taking care of the
sign) together.
Figure 8.7 shows a full page Bode form to be used in problem solving.
Copy as required. There is a choice of whether you use f cycles per second
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
or ω in radians per second (delete one of them when you have decided).
The scales in decibels are for you to adjust trying to accommodate the
response in the space provided. The same is valid for the angle scale that
you can adjust to suit your problem.
Figure 8.7
Answer:
The first part is a constant and the second part is a Bode type D.
Factorising
Answer:
vi = vA + vAjωCR + vojωCR
= vA + (1 + jωCR) + vojωCR
Replace νA
Impedance Z
Potential divider
Figure 8.14
Transfer function
Angle
Find the transfer function and express it in the standard Bode form. Find
the limits of a resistor that will produce a corner frequency from 1000
rad/s to 10000 rad/s.
Draw the Bode plot for R = 10 kΩ for magnitude and angle and obtain
the value of magnitude and angle for ω = 5000 rad/s
ωCR = 1
At ω = 1000
At ω = 10 000
Figure 8.20
We replace values
Find the transfer function and draw the Bode plot for magnitude only.
Figure 8.22
Constant 0.01001
Transfer function
For ω = 0
Find the phase and magnitude of the transfer function at v = 5000 rad/s
Transfer function
Draw the Bode plot for this band pass filter and find the two corner
frequencies.
Figure 8.26
Crossing type A
Figure 8.28
Constant
This gives one type C and two type D. See the plot in Figure 8.28.
Answer:
20 log K = 20 dB
log K = 1
K = 10
The type A will be of the type jωK (a different K). The crossing of the
base level is at 30 rad/s. We need a value of jω/30 because at ω = 30 the
value is 1 which in dB is 0.
The type C has a corner frequency at 800 rad/s. The factor will be
finally
Answer:
Magnitude = 34.06 dB
The diagram has a zero at ω = 5 and three poles at ω = 30, 200 and 500
rad/s.
Normalised branches will be
20 log K = 20
K = 10
Answer: 15.48
dB, 76.21°, 28.59 dB, −7.9°, 6.433 dB, −143°
Constant
30 dB = 20 1og K
K = 31.623
Transfer function
One type A and 3 type D.
Bearing in mind that Bode plots are only approximations, the results are
reasonably good.
Figure 8.34
20 log 1000 = 60 dB
Zeroes at ω = 100 (type C)
Poles (type D) at
From the Bode plot for 30 rad / s the magnitude is −30 dB and the phase
angle is −225°.
Check the magnitude
which is − 28.7 dB
Check the angle:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
which compares very well with the plot.
in terms of type A, B, C or D?
Amplify by j
Constant
log 100 = 2
20 log 100 = 40 dB
Exact value
draw the Bode plot, find the frequency at which the phase shift is 180°
and the critical value of β.
There are three type D functions ready for plotting with corner
frequencies at 10 krad/s and two at 100 krad/s.
Constant
20 log 1000 = 60 dB
A = 40 dB
= 20 log A A = 100
Draw the Bode plot and find the phase and magnitude margins.
Figure 8.38
ω and f readily can be exchanged as they are different units like miles
and kilometres.
Here we have four type D functions
Constant
k = 105
The point to notice here is that it would be too difficult to consider all
the capacitors in one go. So what we do is to consider each capacitor at a
time, assuming that the others are not affecting the circuit. So when we
calculate the effect of C1, C2 and CE are considered to be impedances.
Let us look at Figure 9.3. This is the equivalent circuit. At the corner
frequency
Figure 9.3
RIN = R1 ‖ R2 ‖ re (β + 1)
Output capacitor C2
The equivalent circuit associated with C2 is shown in Figure 9.4.
Figure 9.4
Bypass capacitor CE
This circuit is more complicated than the two previous ones. We are now in
the emitter circuit and this circuit is linked to the base circuit.
We draw the equivalent circuit starting from the capacitor CE as shown
in Figure 9.6.
We can use a Thevenin to Norton conversion to get the circuit shown
in Figure 9.7. In this circuit the left-hand side is in the base circuit. On the
right-hand side we have iE which is (β + 1) times iB. We can compensate for
this, assuming that iE flows everywhere, if we modify the values of RS, R1
and R2. In this way we arrive at the circuit of Figure 9.8.
Figure 9.6
Figure 9.7
Figure 9.8
R = XC
R is the total resistance of the circuit ‘seen’ by the capacitor. In this case
the resistance is
R = RS + R1A‖R2A‖re1(β1 + 1)
Effect of C2
Now we move onto the effect of the second capacitor which is located
between the stages. As is normal in a cascaded system, the load of the first
stage is the input resistance of the second stage. This can be seen in Figure
9.11, where we show the equivalent circuit around C2.
Figure 9.11
Cascaded C3
We now move to examine C3 in the cascaded system shown in Figure 9.9.
This should be the same as the output capacitor of a single stage. However,
in this case the emitter resistor is not fully bypassed and RE1B will appear in
the equivalent circuit. The equivalent circuit appears in Figure 9.13. In this
case C3 sees a resistance of RL in series with RCB.
Figure 9.13
VTH = IRCB
RTH = RCB (current source open circuit)
In this case the resistor RElB is not seen by capacitor C3. The total resistance
of the circuit is RCB in series with RL.
Find the break frequency due to C1 and the value of C2 to give a break
Capacitor C1
Capacitor C2
Answer: 134.7 Hz
AC model
Figure 9.17
Frequency
Answer: 23.97 Hz
AC model
Figure 9.19
Answer: 30 μF
AC model
Figure 9.21
Answer: 214.78 Hz
Resistance
AC model
Figure 9.23
Approximate method
AC model
Figure 9.25
Answer: CE = 341 μF
DC conditions
Thevenin
AC model
Figure 9.28
AC model
C2
CE
Figure 9.33
DC conditions
C2
Bypass capacitor
Figure 9.35
DC conditions
Approximate method
AC conditions
Figure 9.40
AC model – C1
Figure 9.42
Capacitor C2
Figure 9.43
AC model
Figure 9.45
Capacitor C2
Bypass capacitor
Figure 9.46
Find the values of C1, C2 and CE so that the three lower corner
frequencies are at 150 Hz.
AC model
Figure 9.48
Capacitor C1
Capacitor C2
Resistance
AC model – C2
Figure 9.51
Capacitor C3
Approximate method
C1 frequency
C2 frequency
AC model
Figure 9.55
Capacitor C2
Figure 9.56
Answer: 19.58 μF
AC model
Figure 9.58
AC conditions
Figure 9.60
There will be several variations depending on the type of load, the type
of emitter resistor bypass, the type of source impedance, the type of biasing,
but on the whole the above procedure can be used as a guide.
A typical circuit is shown in Figure 10.1. The problem here is to find the
voltage gain at a given high frequency.
Figure 10.1
1) DC conditions
In the circuit above, we have potential divider biasing. We have a choice of
two methods to evaluate the DC conditions: the approximate method, or
the Thevenin method. We will be able to decide which method we should
use by using the criteria:
R1 against βRE
We will find the value of IB, IC, IE and knowing the temperature we can
decide on the two options that we have for re:
2) Midband gain
We now need the model of the transistor for small signal conditions. We
see this in Figure 10.2. This circuit is similar to the one used previously for
midband gain, with the exception of the right-most resistor which carries
iB. RE is bypassed by CE and it doesn’t appear anywhere. RB’E is the value of
little re, reflected to the input side (i.e., multiplied by (β + 1)). We also need
to include RBB’ and this will be part of the information given at the
beginning of the problem. All the above will represent the value of hie (the
input hybrid parameter under common emitter configuration).
Figure 10.2
All the resistors form a potential divider, where the base voltage will be
a proportion of the voltage source, given by
and
3) HF equivalent circuit
The HF circuit was developed in the modelling, (Chapter 4) and based on
that we have the circuit of Figure 10.3. This will be the basic circuit used
and the information given as part of the problem will allow us to do some
simplifications at this stage.
Figure 10.3
5) Miller’s theorem
When we apply Miller’s theorem, we divide the circuit in two. The
appearance of the circuit after applying Miller’s theorem is shown in Figure
10.4.
Figure 10.4
C = CB’E + CM1
CM1 = CB’C(1 − AV)
Sometimes the value of CB’E is not known, although we will know the value
of the transition frequency. In this case, the following relation can be used
CT =CB’E + CB’C
In the circuit on the right, the capacitor has been shown in dotted lines.
This capacitor corresponds to CM2, the Miller’s theorem capacitor.
Due to the fact that the impedance of the capacitor is usually much
greater than RL’, then the capacitor can be neglected, leaving only RL’, in
the output side of the transistor. RL’, will be a combination of resistors
including
6) Thevenin–Norton conversions
It is sometimes possible, according to the circuit, to apply Miller’s theorem,
divide the circuit in two and still have some reductions to do.
We could have the situation of Figure 10.5. This circuit can be reduced
by changing the circuit on the left of AB to a Norton equivalent as we see
in Figure 10.6. The resistors at the left of ST can be joined together. As a
result we get the circuit shown in Figure 10.7. The circuit at the left of ST
can be converted from a Norton to a Thevenin. We would continue
reducing the circuit from left to right. This procedure is quite simple and
avoids having to manipulate complex numbers if we get the capacitor
Figure 10.6
Figure 10.7
7) Final calculations
We will finally arrive at two circuits like the one shown in Figure 10.8. We
have the current source
Figure 10.8
In the first instance we use the impedance, in the second we use the
formula with the admittance. The second alternative seems best in this
case.
There is one more simplification which is to use the absolute value of
the admittance as we are only pursuing the gain of the transistor and the
phase angle is of no significance in this case.
So we have
vO = −gmvB’ERL’
Figure 10.9
Transconductance
The transconductance is the ratio of output current to input voltage with
the output voltage constant.
Trans, means from input to output and conductance implies the
reciprocal of resistance and it is measured in Siemens.
and this will be the way in which we will calculate the transconductance.
iC = βiB
In the high frequency model (Figure 10.10) we define the point B’ which is
an imaginary contact inside the transistor, and not accessible from the
outside.
Figure 10.10
so
iC = βiB
As we are interested in the voltage gain, we start with a voltage source, vB’E
is a function of the voltage source. That is why the current source gmvB’E
(which is the same as vB’E/re), is also a function of the voltage source. The
expression
vo = − gmvB’ERL’
Midband gain
Miller’s theorem
Resistance
Capacitance
Input capacitance
Equivalent resistance
Midband gain
Miller’s theorem
Figure 10.14
Equivalent resistance
R = 270‖10k‖402 = 159 Ω
Equivalent capacitance
Note: C1, C2 and CE are related to the low frequency cut-off. Now we are
concerned with high frequency cut-off. The capacitors do not appear in
the diagram.
AC model
Figure 10.16
Transition frequency
AC model
Figure 10.17
Equivalent resistance
R = 1k‖5k‖522.6 = 321 Ω
hie = (β + 1)re
re = = 4.79 Ω
Miller’s theorem
AC model
Figure 10.19
R = 6k8‖27k‖651.44 = 581.68 Ω
C = 22 + 459.48 = 481.48 pF
fH = = 569 kHz
Note: This is a common base amplifier. The input is in phase with the
output. The Miller effect does not apply as it would need a negative gain!
C = 5 pF
R = 500‖500 = 250 Ω
f1H =
f1H = 107 MHz
Voltage gain
Corner frequency
R = 10k‖5050 = 3355 Ω
CM1 = 2(1 + 200) = 402 pF
C = CB’E + CM1= 5.96 + 402 = 407.96 pF
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
f = 116.28 kHz
Amplifier model
Figure 10.24
Input capacitance
C = CM1 + 22 pF = 128.12 pF
Input resistance
R = 1k4‖980k‖2525 = 900 Ω
fH = 1.38 MHz
R = 900‖4k = 734.69 Ω
= 271 kHz
R = 500‖20k = 488 Ω
= 6.8 MHz
Input resistance
R = 600|2k4 = 480 Ω
Input capacitance
c = 3624 + 60=3684 pF
f1H = 90 kHz
Output side
R = 3k‖9k = 2250 Ω
C = CM2 + C2 = 24 + 36 = 60 pF
Miller
Miller
Voltages
Midband gain
AC model
Figure 10.34
Miller’s theorem
Figure 10.35
Thevenin to Norton
Figure 10.36
Bandwidth fβ
Approximate method
Miller’s theorem
New circuit
Figure 10.39
Input
Output
and
AC model
Figure 10.41
Miller’s theorem
Answer:
RBB’ = 190 Ω RB’E = 2010 Ω
RB’C = 20.097 Ω RCE = 50 kΩ
CB’E = 49 pF CB’C = 4 pF
Little re
Additional data:
Answer: 4.4
Ac model
Figure 10.44
New circuit
Figure 10.45
Thevenin to Norton
Figure 10.46
Norton to Thevenin
Figure 10.47
Thevenin to Norton
Magnitude of Y1 at 10 MHz
Magnitude of Y2 at 10 MHz
Therefore
Thevenin to Norton
Figure 10.51
Norton to Thevenin
Figure 10.52
Voltage amplification
Miller’s theorem
Figure 10.55
Properties
a) Very high open loop voltage gain which is about 100 000 for DC and low
frequency AC. The gain decreases as the frequency increases.
b) Very high input impedance, which is about 108 to 1010 Ω, so that the
current taken from the source is minute. The input voltage is passed to
the Op-Amp with little loss.
c) Very low output impedance, which is around 100 Ω which results in an
efficient transfer of input voltage to any load greater than a few kΩs.
Physical details
With reference to the popular 741 Op-Amp we can say that it has one
output and two inputs. The non-inverting input is marked +, and the
inverting input is marked − as shown in Figure 11.1. Its operation is
convenient, from a dual balanced power supply giving equal positive and
negative voltages Vs in the range of ±5 V to ±15 V. The 0 V is the centre
point of the power supply and is common to the input and output circuits
and is usually the voltage reference point.
Figure 11.1
These two consequences are very important and will be used as a technique
to solve most of the Op-Amp problems that will follow.
The first consequence can be stated as V+ = V−. This is sensible due to
the large amplification of the Op-Amp. If we have an output of 5 V and the
amplification is 100 000, it means that the input must be 0.000 05 V. This
quantity being so small can be approximated to 0 V. This is indeed an
approximation, but a very useful one.
The second consequence can be stated as I+ = I− = 0. That is to say, there
are no currents going in or out of the Op-Amp inputs. This is indeed an
approximation, but a very useful one.
Inverting amplifier
The inverting Op-Amp is shown in Figure 11.2. The input voltage is applied
to resistor R1 to the inverting input V−. The output will have a − sign, that is
to say it will be in antiphase to the input. The non-inverting input is
connected to 0 V.
Figure 11.2
Offset voltage
In practical terms, when there is no signal present, there may be a slight
quiescent voltage present. This is called the differential input offset voltage.
Although this input signal could only have a value of around 1 mV, due to
the high amplification of the Op-Amp, it would be unacceptable in most
cases.
The 741 Op-Amp has a correction circuit between pin 1 and 5, the offset
null adjustment. A potentiometer of 10 KΩ can be connected to pins 1 and 5
with the centre point connected to the negative of the supply. The
potentiometer is adjusted to give zero output when the input is zero volts.
For AC operation, a capacitor at the output removes any DC voltage
arising from the input offset.
Output current
A typical Op-Amp can supply a maximum output current of 5 mA,
therefore the minimum load that can be fed is roughly 2 kΩ, on an
operation of ±10 V. If a greater input current is required, an emitter
follower output stage or an Op-Amp current booster can be used.
Negative feedback
Op-Amps can use negative feedback obtained by feeding back some of the
ouput to the inverting input. The part of the output fed back to the input
produces a voltage at the output that opposes the one from which it is
taken, thereby reducing the new output of the amplifier. The resulting
closed loop gain A is then less than the open loop gain Ao. In compensation,
a wider range of values of voltage can be applied to the input for
amplification. The opposite would be the result if the feedback is applied to
the non-inverting input (positive feedback). Negative feedback also gives
greater stability, less distortion and increased bandwidth.
Non-inverting amplifier
The non-inverting Op-Amp is shown in Figure 11.4. The formula for the
output of this amplifier is:
Figure 11.4
Positive feedback
The principle of positive feedback can be understood with reference to the
sequence of three sketches shown in Figures 11.7–11.9.
Figure 11.7
Figure 11.8
The first, Figure 11.7, shows an Op-Amp with an input to the inverting
input. The positive feedback is done by R2 which feeds a fraction of the
output to the non-inverting input. The fraction is R1/(R1 + R2).
We assume an ideal case in Figure 11.7. There is no input, i.e. 0 V input.
We also show a 0 V output. This is only theoretically possible because in
reality, any difference in the input will produce a small output. This small
output will feedback a signal which will increase the previous difference
and the output will continue to grow, the feedback will become larger until
the Op-Amp is saturated.
Normally the difference between V+ and V− is very small. Due to the
large amplification of the Op-Amp a very small input is sufficient to
produce the required output. When the Op-Amp reaches saturation, this is
not the case, as we will see.
Figure 11.8 shows the first case. We know that with zero input and zero
output the Op-Amp with positive feedback is unstable. We assume here
that the first difference was positive. As we described earlier, the feedback
will help the signal and the output will continue to grow until it reaches the
maximum. This maximum is a little less than the rails. The circuit settles at
14 V output, 7 V input which is the positive feedback from the potential
divider. In order to change the output from positive to negative, the input
has to grow to over 7 V.
Answer:
Total solution
Answer:
Superposition
a) set v1 = 0
b) set v2 = 0
Set v1 = 0
Total solution
Note that the inputs on the inverting side appear in the result with a
minus sign, whereas inputs to the non-inserting side appear in the result
with a plus sign (as expected).
Superposition
v+ = v− = 0 (virtual earth)
Solution
Answer: 9 V
but
Answer: 880 kΩ
a) vi = 0.75 V
The capacitor isolates the DC. There is no current through the 10k
resistor.
v+ = v− = vi
Answer: R = 80 kΩ
Superposition
vo = v−
v+ = v− and then v+ = vo
vo = v−
Potential divider
But v+ = v−, so
Superposition
a) v2 = 0
50k‖200k = 40 kΩ
b) v1 = 0
50k‖100k = 33 333.33 Ω
Amplification
Calculate as a function of x.
Answer:
Figure 11.23
Calculate in function of x.
Answer:
Figure 11.24
At Zener
Answer: R2 = 2 kΩ and R3 = 10 kΩ
a) v1 = 0
v+ = v2
voa = v2 = 2v2
b) v2 = 0
v+ = v− = 0
vob = = −v1
Total output
vo = 2v2 − v1
VA = −5 − 7.5 = −12.5 V
VB = −VA = 12.5 V
V+ = V−
The nodes are usually, one at each input and one at the output, although
you would place them wherever you need them. Sometimes one equation
at one node is sufficient to solve the problem.
The important point here is to set the equation correctly according to
the direction of the current. Let us look at Figure 12.1. In the first case, the
current flows from ν1 to ν2. The equation for the current is
Figure 12.1
In the second case the current flows from ν6 to ν5. The equation for i8 is
Comparator
The Op-Amp can be used as a comparator in an open loop configuration. A
linear voltage can be fed into one of the inputs. The other input can be held
to ground. This arrangement is shown in Figure 12.2. The input and output
waveforms are also shown. When the input is positive, the output is
saturated positive. When the input is negative, the output is saturated
negative. So, in a way, this circuit accepts an analogue input and will
provide a digital output.
Figure 12.2
Window detector
If you only need to detect a band, within the range available, that is also
possible and it is called a window detector. This can be seen in Figure 12.5.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
There are basically two comparators, one for each edge. The top one gives a
low output at high voltage and the lower comparator gives a low for low
voltage. In between, both give a positive output.
Figure 12.5
In order to get the window effect, the output will be high if both
comparators give a high output.
Outside the high band we will have a situation where one comparator
gives a low output whilst the other gives a high output. In this case we
don–t want a conflict between the two signals and we want the low signal
to take preference.
These details are not shown in the circuit, but the problem would be
resolved by using Op-Amps with open collector outputs and possibly a
pull-up resistor in the circuit.
We want to know the voltage at the positive terminal, when the output
is high. We call the voltage at the positive terminal, V+H.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
This can be checked against the diagram in the left part of Figure 12.8.
We refer to V+L as the voltage at V+ when the output is low:
We can also do the same equation, not this time from VREF, but from VL.
We get:
In this circuit:
This simplifies to
At node B:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
We assume here that the first two currents are going into the node,
whereas IL is going out of the node. If this is not true, then we would get a
minus sign in the result.
We find V− from the first equation, V+ from the second equation and we
equate them, i.e.:
we obtain:
Answer: 80 kΩ
At node ν−
At node ν+
Answer: Yes
At node ν+
Answer: 9 V
At node ν−
At node ν+
But ν+ = ν− = 0
At OA3
Equating ν+ = ν−
Replace νB = ν2
Replace νA
Current OA1
Output OA1
The second Op -Amp has 0 V at ν−. The current also runs into A.
Current OA1
Answer: νo = −3v1 − ν2
Superposition ν1 = 0
Input to ν−. R in series with R‖R.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
At A the input is
Superposition ν2 = 0
The current from ν1 is ν1/R and similarly from B to νo the current is
2ν1/R
Total output
νo = −3ν1−ν2
Answer: 0.6 mA
R1 current
Answer: R = 500 Ω
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Amplification
We are going to find the value of ν+ and then, use the amplification to
obtain the result.
Amplification
Answer:
At node ν−
At node ν+
Now we equate
ν+ = ν−
3ν+ = 3ν−
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Therefore
Answer: VA = 4 V and VB = 8 V
Answer: νo = 0 V
Output OA1
Output OA2
Answer: Yes
Output at A
νo = ν2 + 500ν1
Gain
Output current
Answer: −600 mA
Due to the positive feedback loop, (R1 and R2), the output νo will be
unstable at switch on and the ouput will saturate at a positive or negative
value. If the output is positive, the capacitor will charge through the RC
circuit towards the positive output voltage. The voltage ν+ at the Op-Amp is
given by the potential divider network formed by R1 and R2 and this acts as
a reference voltage point.
The capacitor would normally charge towards the positive saturation
point, but before it gets to this value, it will match the value of ν+ and at
this point everything will change. As the negative input ν−, will be larger
than ν+, the output will saturate at the negative value. Now that we have a
negative output value, the process can be repeated in the other direction,
this time, the capacitor discharges. As the output changes from positive to
negative and so on, the output is a square wave.
We now examine Figure 13.2, to find the frequency of oscillation.
E and −E are the values of the saturated outputs, positive and negative,
respectively. V and −V are the maximum and minimum values at the
positive feedback differential input V+.
So
Some people would have been able to write this equation by just
looking at Figure 13.2.
Similarly, as they are symmetrical
therefore
Different resistors
More often than not, R1 will be different from R2 (see Figure 13.1). This can
be taken into account by using the potential divider effect of R1 and R2 onto
the crossing point defined above as V.
We start by rewriting the exponential equation we have already
developed:
and with
555 Timer
The 555 timer circuit is seen in Figure 13.4. Basically, there are two Op-
Amps that control the setting and resetting of a flip-flop register. The flip-
flop operates an NPN transistor and the ouput stage. A capacitor, part of an
external circuit, can be charged through a suitable circuit and it can be
discharged by the NPN transistor.
Figure 13.4
Charge curve
Time to charge from 0 to 2/3 VCC
Time to charge from 0 to 1/3 VCC
The difference is the charge time.
Discharge curve
Time to discharge from VCC to 2/3 VCC
Time to discharge from VCC to 1/3 VCC
The difference is the discharge time.
From 0 to VCC
From 0 to VCC
Therefore
Δt = 0.693 (R + RA)C
t = 0.693 (R + RA)C
Therefore
T = 0.693(2R + RA)C
If βA = 1 then,
Although mathematically you are not allowed to divide by zero, in
electronic terms this means that you can have an output, without having an
input.
The conditions for oscillation are:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Magnitude of βA = 1
The phase angle will be zero, if the imaginary part is zero. Therefore:
At this frequency
Figure 13.11
We want the value of νo/νi. We start from the output and work
backwards to the input
6 ω2C2R2 = 1
R2 = R3 = R
and that:
R1 ‖ R4 = R
Loading effect
A brief point to be mentioned here is the effect of loading on a circuit. The
basic network is shown in Figure 13.13. It has the following transfer
function:
Figure 13.13
Answer: 36k45 Ω
Answer: 0.4422 μF
Answer: 455 Hz
Charging time
as R1 = R2
Answer: 274.7 Hz
Find the frequency of Oscillation as shown and then the oscillation when
R is exchanged with RA.
As shown
Answer: 39 : 28
Charging time
tC = 0.693(R + RA)C
Discharging time
td = 0.693 RC
Ratio
C = 0.001 μF
R1 = 12 kΩ
R2 = 24 kΩ
Answer: 15.92 Hz
Say
R1 = 24 kΩ
R2 = 696 kΩ
Answer: 0.325 μF
Note that
4k‖4k = 2 kΩ
The last effective R from the CR network is also 2 kΩ. The gain required
is also achieved.
Answer: 1 V
νREF = 6 V output 10 V
Case b)
νREF = 6 V output 0 V
=5.4 V
Hys = 6.4 − 5.4 = 1 V
Determine the upper and lower switching points of the comparator (with
positive feedback).
Case b) νo at 0 V
The circuit is now completely symmetrical and we should expect ν+
to be 0 V. We will see.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
PROBLEM 13.15 Miscellaneous Problems
Figure 13.26
The output of the comparator varies from 0 V to 5 V. Find the upper and
lower switching levels.
R = 15k‖120k‖12k = 6315.789 Ω
R = 6315.789
1 − 0.8 = 0.2 mA
ν+ = 0.2 × 10−3 × 6315.789 = 1.263 V
a) Find
b) If νi = 5 mV calculate the voltage at X and at νo.
νx = −10νi = −50mV
νo = −1020νi = −5.1 V
Answer: 102 Ω
KCL i1 + i3 = i2
Answer:
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
ν+ = ν − = νi
Answer:
Answer:
Due to the properties of the Op-Amps, high input impedance and the
virtual short circuit input, we have
Figure 14.2
This is:
This Bode plot shows the error, which is greatest at the corner
frequency. This error can be calculated at the corner frequency.
The magnitude or gain is:
In this picture we have introduced three new terms: βo, fβ and fT. They
are very important parameters for high frequency operation. βo is the
midband gain of the transistor, which at midband is considered to be
constant. fβ is the bandwidth. It is taken from 0 frequency, until the gain
starts to drop. Remember that in a straight line approximation this is the
corner frequency, or the point where the line bends. fT is the transition
frequency. The gain is progressively reduced until a value of 1 is reached.
There is no more amplification beyond this point and the amplifier doesn’t
work any more.
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
β=1
20 log 1 = 0 dB
If we are plotting in decibels, the crossing is the 0 dB level. For this reason
we have the following accepted names for fT:
Compensation
We know that the conditions for oscillation for an amplifier with positive
feedback is that the loop gain be 1.
βA = 1
In this case:
R1 < R1 ‖ R2
which means that we have a zero first and then the pole. This, in Bode
form, can be seen in Figure 14.7. The zero and the pole have been placed
over a decade apart to make the drawing easier to read. This particular
network is widely used in feedback systems as a stabilising circuit.
Figure 14.7
as s → ∞
in decibels : 20 log 1 = 0 dB
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
See Figure 14.8. We have put the response of a three-pole amplifier as a
standard amplifier. We have in the same figure included the effect of the
equalising network (or compensating network). In order to make it easier to
see what is compensated and what is the original this has been mentioned
in the graph. In addition we have shaded the gap between the original and
the compensated response.
Figure 14.8
In this case the gain of the uncompensated circuit for a phase angle of
−180° is approximately −41 dB, at a frequency of approximately 300 Hz. The
gain margin is therefore 41 dB.
With compensation we see that the frequency for a phase angle of −180°
is approximately 30 Hz and the gain is −45 dB. The gain margin in this case
is 45 dB.
It is clear that the location of poles and zeros of the compensating
network, in relation to the poles and zeros of the circuit can drastically alter
the shape of the response.
Measurement of fβ and fT
fT transition frequency
fβ bandwidth
Figure 14.16
iout = −gmνB’E
therefore
We are dealing with the transistor under short circuit. The incoming
current is iB and the output current is iC, the amplification is therefore β (or
hFE).
From the Bode theory we know that if ω ≪ 1, we can neglect the ω term.
Under the straight line approximation we are at the constant β range, or
midband and we can call this βo. So:
βo = gmRB’E
The −20 dB per decade slope can be obtained using the Bode theory. If
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
ω ≫ 1, the term 1 disappears and we have:
so
20 log a = 20 dB
log a = 1
a = 10
So
cxa=cxb
In log form:
Therefore: fT = cd
fT = gain × bandwidth
20 log β = 40 dB
log β = 2
β = 100
fT = βo × fβ = 100 × 3 MHz = 300 MHz
At point B:
20 log β = 20
log β = 1
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
β = 10
fT = βo × fβ = 10 × 30 MHz = 300 MHz
This is valid at any point in the slope. The product β times bandwidth is
constant and equal to the transition frequency.
Electronic relationship
We look at Figure 14.21. The transition frequency fT comes from the
necessity of knowing the maximum useable high frequency of the
transistor. The frequency at which the absolute value of the short circuit
common emitter current reduces to one (0 value in dB), is termed the
transition frequency.
Figure 14.21
But fB was
Therefore
fT = βo × fB
The main difference between an ideal Op-Amp and a practical one lies in
the voltage gain. In the ideal Op-Amp the gain is considered to be infinite
whereas in practice it is very high. Practical figures are shown in brackets
in the list above. But the main difference in the practical Op-Amp is that
the voltage gain decreases as the frequency increases.
Some Op-Amps allow a capacitor to be added externally to provide
compensation, but most Op-Amps are internally compensated. That is to
say they have RC networks which introduce a pole at a given point
providing a single pole compensation, and therefore giving a predictable
response. When there is internal compensation, the manufacturers produce
curves with details of the bandwidth – gain and phase against frequency
for the open loop response.
Go is the open loop gain at DC and very low frequency. This is shown
to be 100 dB. The corner frequency is at 10Hz. The curve will reach 0 dB at
the transition frequency fT. The 0 dB value correspond to a ratio of 1 in volt
per volt. This is why this point is also termed the unity gain frequency
(UGF). This value also corresponds to the gain bandwidth product (GBP).
In a closed loop situation with negative feedback the gain of the open
loop amplifier is divided by 1 + βA.
If βA is much greater than 1, then the closed loop gain can be
approximated to 1/β. This lower gain, corresponding to the closed loop gain
can be plotted on the previous response. We see this in Figure 14.24. We see
that the closed loop gain intercepts the open loop gain at fCLC (closed loop
corner frequency). This means that at a lower gain we have a larger
bandwidth and that the bandwidth increases as the closed loop gain
decreases.
Figure 14.24
We can also verify the values of the closed loop gain for given values of
β.
For β = 0.001 and A = 105
This capacitor C1M, combined with the input resistance Ri would form a
corner frequency given by
Input
Therefore
Ideal value
For A = 103
Difference
Difference
9 − 8.999 = 0.001
A different of 0.01%
Find the deviation of the closed loop gain from the ideal value for A =
103 and A = 105.
Ideal value
A difference of 1%
For A = 105
Transition frequency
For a gain of 1
Amplification
Bandwidth
Answer:. 25 kHz.
Bandwidth
Slew rate
For a sine wave
ν(t) = k sin ωt
SMAX = kω
In this case the limiting factor is the gain giving a limit of 25 kHz.
Answer: 125
Answer: Yes
The Op-Amp has a slew rate of 0.5 V/μs and fT = 1 MHz. The input signal
is a 0.2 V rms sine wave. Can it be used up to 50 kHz?
What new value of RF would work up to 50 kHz?
Bandwidth
No problem is here.
Now the slew rate
Input signal 0.2 V rms sine wave
Peak value
20 log X = 106
log X = 5.3
X = 200 000
fT = βB
200 000 = β × 1000
β = 2000
Gain at 1 kHz
fT = βB
2 000 000 = 100B
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
B = 20 000 Hz
If the closed loop gain is to be −49.5, find the value of the open loop gain
and the value of the loop gain.
fT = 1.2 MHz. Find the closed loop bandwidth and the closed loop gain at
600 kHz.
Gain
At 600 KHz
fT = gain × BW
= 200 000 × 5 = 1 MHz
Corner frequency
Closed loop gain
OA2
Total A = 19 × 21 = 399
Bandwidth OA1
Bandwidth OA 2
The limit is OA 2.
The transition frequency for both amplifiers is 750 kHz. Find the upper
corner frequency of the system.
Answer: 10 kHz
Gain OA1
Gain OA 2
Answer: 3244 Hz
High pass
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
Bandwidth = 3310 − 66
= 3244 Hz
Answer: No
OA3
OA1
The amplifier will not work at 55 kHz. OA2 and OA3 are alright, but
OA1 has the signal ν1 with a gain of 20 which is more than 18.18. This
amplifier will work only up to 50 kHz.
Absolute temperature, 90
AC load line, 67
Active region, 65
Admittance, 178
Anagram, 118
Approximate method, 55
Bandwidth:
gain considerations, 237
measurement, 244
Base spreading resistance, 90
Beta, 93
Biasing, 54
Bode plot paper, 138
Bode plots, 135
Bode type A, 135
Bode type B, 135
Bode type C, 137
Bode type D, 137
Bode way, 137
Boltzman constant, 90
Bypass capacitor, 163
Capacitor effect, 87
Cascaded 3 dB points, 163
Cascaded current gain, 117
DC load line, 66
Depletion capacitance, 91
Differential Op-Amp, 196
Diffusion capacitance, 90
Digital operation, 87
Diode equation, 89
Dividing voltage and current, 6
Filter, 258
Forward transfer current ratio, 86
Frequency response of RC network, 237
Full hybrid equivalent circuit, 90
H parameters, 85
High frequency, 162, 176
DC conditions, 176
equivalent circuit, 177
final calculations, 178
mid band gain, 176
simplifications to circuit, 177
Thevenin-Norton conversions, 178
Hybrid parameters, 85
Kirchhoff’s law, 1
Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL), 1
Line review, 66
Little re model, 89
Load lines, 65
equal swing, 68
Loading effect, 227
Logarithmic transformation, 139
Low frequency, 162
Ohm’s law, 1
Operational amplifiers, 194
applications, 206
consequences, 194
offset voltage, 195
Parallel resistors, 7
Phase angle, 136
Phase lag network, 239
Phase lead network, 239
Phase margin, 160, 244
Phase shift oscillator, 225
Phase splitter circuit, 105
Polar form, 135
Polarity of voltage, 1
Pole equalizing network, 241
Poles, 135
Positive feedback, 197
Potential divider, 131, 134
biasing, 55
Power limitation, 65
Practical Op-Amp, 248
Q Point, 66
Saturation, 65
Short circuit paramaters, 84
Thermal voltage, 90
Thevenin method for potential divider, 55
Thevenin resistance, 12
Thevenin voltage, 12
Thevenin’s theorem, 12
Thevenin-Norton conversions, 24
Timer (555), 223
Transconductance, 179
Transistor:
input characteristics, 86
model, 83
model high frequency, 90
modelling, 83
output characteristics, 86
Transition frequency measurement, 244
Transparency to AC, 87, 93
Type A and D together, 155, 158
Value of saturation, 65
Voltage:
amplification, 104
amplification ratio, 49
to current converter, 208–210
division rule, 6
gain, 104
level indicator, 206
******ebook converter DEMO Watermarks*******
source, 1
Y parameters, 84
Z parameters, 83
Zenner diode, 204
Zeroes, 135