Interferon Alpha Gene Expression and Serum Level Association With Low Vitamin D Levels in Egyptian Female Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Interferon Alpha Gene Expression and Serum Level Association With Low Vitamin D Levels in Egyptian Female Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Interferon Alpha Gene Expression and Serum Level Association With Low Vitamin D Levels in Egyptian Female Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
journals.sagepub.com/home/lup
PAPER
Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are prone to develop vitamin
D (25(OH) D3) deficiency, due to several factors and there is an association between lower
vitamin D levels and higher SLE disease activity. The aim of this research was to assess the
prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Egyptian female patients with SLE. Furthermore, we
analyzed the potential relationship between this deficiency and SLE manifestations, disease
activity, and its effect on interferon alpha (IFN-a) gene expression and serum level. Methods:
We evaluated the serum levels of vitamin D 25(OH)D3 and IFN-a by enzyme-linked immuno-
sorbent assay (ELISA). IFN-a gene expression was measured by real-time polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) assay in 123 Egyptian female patients with SLE and in 100 females as a healthy
control group. Results: Vitamin D deficiency was prevalent in 20.30%, while insufficiency was
prevalent in 42.40% of the total group of patients. Serum levels of 25(OH)D3 were signifi-
cantly decreased in the group of severe disease, and in the group of patients with lupus
nephritis. 25(OH)D3 showed highly significant negative correlation with the SLE Disease
Activity Index (SLEDAI) in the high activity group and lupus nephritis group. There was a
significant negative correlation between 25(OH)D3 and IFN-a serum level and gene expres-
sion in all patients; more significant in the group with lupus nephritis. Conclusions: The
deficiency of 25(OH)D3 has a direct relationship with increase disease activity and nephritis
in Egyptian SLE patients, suggesting the need for vitamin D supplementation in these
patients. Also, it is directly correlated with increased secretion and gene expression of IFN-
a, suggesting its role in pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, to be confirmed by further longitu-
dinal observational studies. Lupus (2017) 0, 1–11.
urine protein, blood urea, serum creatinine and 10 pmol of each primer. The cycling conditions
serum complement components C3 and C4. Anti- were as follows: 95 C for 4 min; 35 cycles of 95 C
double stranded DNA (anti-ds-DNA) antibodies for 30 s, 55 C for 30 s and 72 C for 30 s. A final
were estimated using enzyme-linked immunosorb- elongation step was performed at 72 C for
ent assay (ELISA) (Immulisa, Immco Diagnostic, 10 min. Each measurement was performed in dupli-
NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s cate. Melting curves were performed to confirm the
protocol. specificity of PCR products. IFN-a gene expression
was calculated using the 2-Ct method where
Measurement of serum vitamin D and IFN- Ct ¼ Ct of IFN-a -Ct of GAPDH.32
concentrations
Statistical analysis
Serum 25(OH)D3 level is the best indicator of over-
all vitamin D status, because it reflects total vitamin All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS,
D from dietary intake and sunlight exposure, as version 21.0 (IBM Corp, NY, USA).
well as the conversion of vitamin D from stores in The normality of continuous variables was estab-
the liver.28 Therefore, serum 25(OH)D3 levels were lished by means of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
measured by a competitive ELISA (kit provided by Normally distributed variables were summarized
Immundiagnostik, USA). Values of 25(OH)D3 using the mean and standard deviation (SD). The
20 ng/ml were considered ‘deficient’; values ranging median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were used
from 21–29 ng/ml were considered ‘insufficient’ and for asymmetrically distributed variables. The
levels 30 ng/ml were considered ‘sufficient’.29 prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency
Serum levels of IFN-a were measured using a was calculated as the ratio between the number of
human IFN-a ELISA kit (Bender MedSystems, patients with 25(OH)D3. The comparison of con-
CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruc- tinuous variables of mild, moderate and severe dis-
tions with some modifications. Mouse serum at 5% ease groups were analyzed by means of one-way
was added to the assay buffer to neutralize hetero- analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis test of
trophile antibodies and avoid false-positive parametric and non-parametric data respectively.
results.30 Comparisons of continuous variables between
active and inactive lupus nephritis groups were
RNA extraction and reverse transcription done using the independent Student’s t-test in the
case of normal variables and the Mann–Whitney
Total RNA was isolated from whole blood using U-test in the case of non-normal variables. The
QIAamp RNA blood mini kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) results were considered significant at p < 0.05.
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA Spearman correlation coefficients were used to
concentration was determined spectrophotometric- evaluate the association between 25(OH)D3,
ally at 260 nm and stored at 80 C. RNA was IFN-a and SLEDAI-2K.
reverse transcribed using QuantiTect reverse tran-
scription kit (Qiagen) according to the manufac-
turer’s instructions. Results
Real-time PCR assay of IFN-
Prevalence of 25(OH)D3 in SLE patients
The expression of IFN-a was carried out using real-
time thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc, Watertown, The demographic characteristics of the 123 SLE
Massachusetts, USA) according to Palmer et al.31 female patients included in this study are summar-
Glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase ized in Table 1. The mean level of serum 25(OH)D3
(G3PDH) was used as internal control for data nor- was 25.96 8.21 ng/ml in all of our SLE patients.
malization. Primers used for PCR were as follow: A total of 52 of those patients (42.30%) had
IFN-a (sense: 50 TTCCTCCTGYYTGAWGGAC 25(OH)D3 insufficiency while 25 (20.30%) had
AGA-3; antisense: 50 -GATCTCATGATTTCTGC 25(OH)D3 deficiencies.
TCTGACA-30 ), G3PDH (sense: 50 -GGTATCGT
GGAAGGACTCATGAC-30 ; antisense: 50 -ATGC Characterization of patients according to
disease severity
CAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAGC-30 ). Real-time
PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 ml Demographic and clinical data (in different groups
containing: 2 ml of cDNA, 10 ml of Syber Green of patients) associated with disease severity are dis-
PCR Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics USA) and played in Table 1. Patient ages and disease duration
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
4
Table 1 Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristic Table 2 Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristic
data for all study patients data (mean SD) between different groups of patients by
disease activity
Variable SLE (n ¼ 123) Control (n ¼ 100)
Mild Moderate High
Age year (mean SD) 38.34 9.38 36.24 7.54 activity activity activity
Disease duration year 7.31 4.04 NA Groups n ¼ 60 n ¼ 42 n ¼ 21
(mean SD)
SLEDAI-2K (mean SD) 6.54 3.84 NA Age (year) 38.70 9.48a 38.19 9.90a 40.52 8.23a
C3 mg/dl (mean SD) 47.08 15.90 125.25 25.24 Disease duration (year) 6.52 3.48a 6.81 4.58a 7.52 4.09a
C4 mg/dl (mean SD) 19.67 7.55 45.25 12.45 SLEDAI-2K score 3.87 2.04a 6.98 1.28b 13.48 1.47c
ESR mm/hr (median IQR) 47.16 21.00 9.51 2.1 C3 (mg/dl) 50.08 11.14a 41.47 11.45b 26.85 6.93c
Positive anti-ds-DNA, n (%) 85 (69) NA C4 (mg/dl) 22.51 6.36a 20.72 6.252a 9.43 1.94b
Anti-ds-DNA U/ml 455 221 NA Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.21 0.248b 1.25 0.241b 1.76 0.261a
(median IQR) Urea (mg/dl) 45.65 6.06b 49.47 8.90b 58.81 8.55a
Serum creatinine mg/dl 1.32 0.33 0.95 ESR (mm/hr) 35.85 11.54c 50.36 8.57b 97.42 14.29a
(mean SD) Anti-ds-DNA (U/ml)
Urea mg/dl (mean SD) 49.21 8.84 29.5 5.1 Median IQR 395 92.75c 567 170b 865 122a
Malar rash, n (%) 97 (81) NA 25(OH)D3 (ng/ml) 29.25 6.74a 27.30 5.80b 13.85 3.69c
Discoid rash, n (%) 20 (16) NA 25(OH)D3 28 (46.6) 21 (50) 3 (14.3)
Photosensitivity, n (%) 71 (58) NA insufficiency (%)
Oral ulcers, n (%) 20 (16) NA 25(OH)D3 2 (3.4) 5 (11.9) 18 (85.7)
None erosive arthritis, n (%) 50 (41) NA deficiency (%)
Serositis, n (%) 12 (10) NA IFN-a level (pg/ml) 45.60 14.62a 59.48 14.51b 85.76 13.80c
Fatigue, n (%) 97 (79) NA (mean SD)
Renal disorders (proteinuria 51 (41.46) NA IFN-a expression 1.52 0.81a 3.51 2.36b 6.45 1.71c
and/or hematuria) (mean SD)
Vit-D3 ng/ml (mean SD) 25.96 8.21 45.82 9.17
Vit-D3 insufficiency (%) 52 (42.3) NA
anti-ds-DNA: anti-double stranded DNA; ESR: erythrocyte sedimen-
Vit-D3 deficiency (%) 25 (20.3) NA
tation rate; IFN: interferon; IQR: interquartile range; NA: not applic-
IFN-a level (pg/ml) (mean SD) 57.6 20.36 10.63 3.56
able; SD: standard deviation; SLEDAI-2K: systemic lupus
IFN-a expression (mean SD) 3.06 2.45 1.07 0.31
erythematosus disease activity index; Vit-D3: vitamin D3.
a,b,c
The mean or the median of the same raw data not followed by the
anti-ds-DNA: anti-double stranded DNA; ESR: erythrocyte sedimen- same letters differ significantly, (p < 0.05).
tation rate; IFN: interferon; IQR: interquartile range; NA: not
applicable; SD: standard deviation; SLEDAI-2K: systemic lupus ery-
thematosus disease activity index; Vit-D3: vitamin D3. Furthermore, the serum levels of IFN-a were sig-
nificantly higher in the highly active group of
patients in comparison with the mild and moderate
were not significantly different between different
groups (85.76 13.80 versus 45.60 14.62 and
groups. The SLEDAI-2K score was significantly 59.48 14.51 respectively) as shown in Table 2.
higher in the highly active group as compared
with other groups. Regarding the serum levels of IFN- gene expression
the anti-ds-DNA, ESR, serum creatinine and urea,
they were significantly elevated in highly active There was overexpression of the IFN-a gene in the
group as compared with mild and moderately SLE group compared with the control group
active groups. The high activity group had a signifi- (3.06 2.45 versus 1.07 0.31 respectively) as
cant decrease in serum levels of C3 and C4 com- shown in Table 1. When stratified by SLE disease
pared with other SLE groups. The prevalence (%) activity, the expression level was much higher in the
of 25(OH)D3 deficiency was higher among patients highly active group than in the mild and moder-
of the active group than in the mild and moderate ately active groups (6.45 1.71 versus 1.52 0.81
groups (85.7% versus 3.4% and 11.9%, respect- and 3.51 2.36 respectively) as shown in Table 2.
ively). Moreover, the prevalence of 25(OH)D3 When comparing those with and without lupus
insufficiency was 46.6%, 50% and 14.3% in mild, nephritis, IFN-a gene expression was much higher
moderate and high active SLE groups respectively. in the nephritis group in comparison with those
The serum levels of 25(OH)D3 were significantly without nephritis (5.42 2.02 versus 1.93 0.85
decreased in highly active group when compared respectively).
with mild and moderate groups (Table 2).
Regarding IFN-a serum level, it was significantly Correlation between 25(OH)D3 and SLE
higher in all SLE patients in comparison with disease activity
the healthy control group (57.6 20.36 versus There was a highly significant negative correlation
10.63 11.56 respectively) as shown in Table 1. between serum 25(OH)D3 concentration and
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
5
Figure 1 (a) The correlation between serum IFN-a level and SLEDAI-2K in all patient group; (b) The correlation between serum
IFN-a level and SLEDAI-2K without nephritis group; (c) The correlation between serum IFN-a level and SLEDAI-2K with
nephritis group.
INF: interferon; SLEDAI: systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index.
SLEDAI-2K scores in all SLE patients (r ¼ 0.591, (r ¼ 0.640, p < 0.001) in all SLE patients
p < 0.001). This negative correlation was significant in (Figure 1(a)). Moreover, this positive correlation
the moderately active group (r ¼ 0.373, p ¼ 0.014) with SLEDAI-2K score was more significant in
while highly significant in the highly active group the nephritis group than in patients without
of patients (r ¼ 0.616, p < 0.001). Furthermore, nephritis (r ¼ 0.846, p < 0.001 versus r ¼ 0.255,
low serum 25(OH)D3 levels were highly signifi- p < 0.032) (Figure 1(b–c)).
cantly inversely correlated with SLEDAI-2K score
in the nephritis group (r ¼ 0.825, p < 0.001) than
in the group without nephritis. Correlation of IFN- gene expression with
SLE disease activity
Correlation of serum IFN- with SLE
As shown in Figure 2(a–c), a strong positive
disease activity
correlation was observed between IFN-a gene
Serum IFN-a levels showed a highly significant expression and SLEDAI-2K scores (r ¼ 0.748,
positive correlation with SLEDAI-2K scores p < 0.001) in all SLE patients, with a higher
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
6
Figure 2 (a) The correlation between IFN-a expression and SLEDAI-2K in all patient group; (b) The correlation between IFN-a
expression and SLEDAI-2K without nephritis group; (c) The correlation between IFN-a expression and SLEDAI-2K with neph-
ritis group.
INF: interferon; SLEDAI: systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index
significance in patients with nephritis (r ¼ 0.729, nephritis than in that without nephritis (data not
p < 0.001) than in patients without nephritis shown).
(r ¼ 0.257, p < 0.030).
Correlation between IFN- serum level and gene
Comparison between groups of patients with and expression with serum vitamin D3
without nephritis
There is a significant negative correlation between
The ages of patients and disease durations, were vitamin D3 and IFN-a serum level (Figure 3(a)),
nonsignificantly different between both groups. (r ¼ 0.53, p < 0.001) and gene expression
C3, C4 and 25(OH)D3 were significantly decreased, (Figure 4(a)), (r ¼ 0.454, p < 0.001) in all of our
while other parameters (SLEDAI-2K score, serum study patients. Also, vitamin D3 was significantly
creatinine, urea, 24-hour urine protein, ESR, anti- negatively correlated with both of them, more in
ds-DNA, IFN-a serum level and gene expression) the nephritis group than that without nephritis
were more significantly elevated in the group with Figure 3(b–c) and Figure 4(b–c).
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
7
Figure 3 (a) The correlation between serum IFN-a level and vitamin D3 in all patient group; (b) The correlation between serum
IFN-a level and vitamin D3 without nephritis group; (c) The correlation between serum IFN-a level and vitamin D3 with nephritis
group.
INF: interferon.
Correlation of vitamin D with laboratory parameters of T-helper cells and B-cells, suggests that this vita-
min can play a role in autoantibody production and
In the nephritis group, low 25(OH)D3 levels
in the clinical manifestations of SLE.24,33 Low
showed significant negative correlation with anti-
levels of vitamin D among SLE patients were
ds-DNA (r ¼ 0.537, p < 0.001) and ESR
demonstrated, first, in 1979.34 Since then; several
(r ¼ 0.649, p < 0,001), while positively correlated
studies have confirmed that the majority of SLE
with C3 (r ¼ 0.506, p < 0.001) and C4 (r ¼ 0.691,
patients have decreased levels of vitamin D.35–37
p < 0.001), confirming its potential association It was mentioned that, vitamin D deficiency is
with active lupus nephritis in SLE patients. highly prevalent among SLE patients and severe
deficiency can increases the risk for moderate to
severe disease activity.38
Discussion Our results here, confirm these studies, where, we
have found that vitamin D insufficiency is prevalent
Association of vitamin D levels with immuno- in about 42.3%, while complete deficiency was
logical abnormalities and changes in the expression prevalent in about 20.3% of the total SLE patients,
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
8
Figure 4 (a) The correlation between IFN-a expression and vitamin D3 serum level in all patient groups; (b) The correlation
between IFN-a expression and vitamin D3 serum level without nephritis group; (c) The correlation between IFN-a expression and
vitamin D3 serum level with nephritis group.
INF: interferon
which is concordant with the preceding accumulat- In the present study, we observed that the renal
ing data denoting prevalence of vitamin D insuffi- disorders (proteinuria and/or hematuria), high
ciency and deficiency in SLE patients, of about 38– titers of anti-ds-DNA levels and lower C3, C4
96% and 8–30%, respectively.38 levels as well as high ESR measures were associated
Also, in agreement with several previous stu- with a significant decrease in the mean values of
dies,6,22,38–42 our results demonstrated low levels serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations, confirming its
of 25(OH)D3 to be associated with higher SLE dis- close relation to active lupus nephritis and higher
ease activity measured by SLEDAI-2K score, while disease activity,45–49 and in favor with the earlier
we are contradictory to other studies which found observations reporting associated low levels of
no association.43,44 The wide variation between dif- 1,25(OH)2D and 25(OH)D with chronic kidney
ferent studies can be related to different ethnicities diseases.50 On the contrary, Monticielo et al.35 did
of participants in each study, geographic location, not find any significant correlation between vitamin
and/or seasonal variations at the time of these D deficiency and clinical or laboratory manifest-
studies. ations of SLE. Also, El Garf et al.13 mentioned
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
9
that, there was no significant correlation between This leads to local synthesis of IFN-a by primary
levels of 25(OH)D3 and disease activity index, dis- human renal proximal tubular cells (RPTECs). By
ease manifestations (nephritis or neuropsychiatric this autocrine loop, IFN-a might have a pathogenic
manifestations) or laboratory parameters (ESR, role in lupus nephritis activating pro-inflammatory
anti-ds-DNA, low complement levels) that may and antigen presentation pathways in RPTECs.63
reflect the disease activity or severity in a cohort The observed significant inverse relationship
of children with juvenile-onset SLE. This discrep- between vitamin D level and IFN-a gene expression
ancy may also due to the shorter disease duration in and serum level in our study, suggests an indirect
children with SLE than with the adults. role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of lupus
Several possible explanations for the vitamin D nephritis through its effect on IFN-a secretion
deficiency among lupus patients have been men- and gene expression by the activated DCs.22,23,39
tioned before.14–18,51–53 Additionally, urinary
losses of 25(OH)D3 and D-binding protein in pro-
teinuric nephropathies, as occurred in lupus neph- Conclusion
ritis, contribute to vitamin D deficiency.54 All of
these factors help in introducing SLE patients in a
vicious circle of deteriorating renal function and In conclusion, low levels of serum 25(OH)D3 are
descending serum level of vitamin D. commonly prevalent in SLE patients and have an
Significant elevation of IFN-a gene expression, inverse relationship with SLE disease activity and
as well as its serum levels, in SLE patients than in active lupus nephritis, through its effects on IFN-a
their matched healthy control (HC) group. In add- gene expression and secretion in plasma by mono-
ition to their negative correlation with serum cytes and dendritic cells. The positive correlations
25(OH)D3 and more significant elevation in the between IFN-a gene expression and serum levels
group with than that without nephritis, was with SLE disease activity, raise the possibility of
observed in our study. These results are in line using this cytokine as a biomarker of the disease,
with previous studies which found that patients especially for lupus nephritis, that needs more
with lupus have higher serum IFN-a activity as extended follow up and observational studies.
compared with healthy unrelated individuals.55 Vitamin D supplementations should be added as
We are also in agreement with another study per- an important supportive immunomodulatory treat-
formed on Indian SLE patients, that showed a sig- ment besides cytotoxic, immunosuppressive and
nificant negative correlation between 25(OH)D3 other lines of treatment of SLE.
levels and plasma IFN-a levels and gene expression,
in addition to the significant negative correlation
between both of them and disease activity.39 Declaration of conflicting interests
It was proved that vitamin D acts upon inhib-
ition of dendritic cell maturation, decreasing the The authors declared no potential conflicts of inter-
expression of IFN-a induced genes in SLE est with respect to the research, authorship, and/or
patients56 and can inhibit monocyte production of publication of this article.
inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-8,
IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a.57
Also, we have found IFN-a serum level signifi- Funding
cantly elevated in patients of the nephritis group.
This is consistent with previous results reporting The authors received no financial support for the
higher serum IFN-a significantly prevalent in SLE research, authorship, and/or publication of this
patients complaining from cutaneous and renal dis- article.
ease,58–60 and thus positively correlating with SLE
disease activity.19 On the other hand, it was proved
that IFN-a gene overexpression occurs in lupus References
patients with low serum vitamin D compared with
individuals with normal serum vitamin D and can 1 Chai HC, Phipps ME, Chua KH. Genetic risk factors of systemic
be diminished after receiving vitamin D supplemen- lupus erythematosus in the malaysian population: A minireview.
tation.61,62 Additionally, Castellano et al.63 con- Clin Dev Immunol 2012; 2012: 1–10.
cluded that an IFN-a signature is detectable in 2 Lam GKW, Petri M. Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23(Suppl.39): S120–S132.
infiltrating plasmacytoid DC and renal tubular 3 Teresa K, Chen-Derek M. Fine top 10 developments in lupus neph-
epithelial cells in patients with lupus nephritis. ritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2013; 15: 358.
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
10
4 Maruotti N, Cantatore FP. Vitamin D and the immune system. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum
J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 491–495. 1992; 35: 630–640.
5 Azrielan S, Shoenfeld Y, Muove ES. Vitamin D is essential in 28 Rosen CJ. Vitamin D insufficiency. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:
preventing and modulating SLE. Lupus 2016; 25: 563–572. 248–254.
6 Yap KS, Northcott M, Hoi ABY, et al. Association of low vitamin 29 Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:
D with high disease activity in an Australian systemic lupus ery- 266–281.
thematosus cohort. Lupus Sci Med 2015; 2: e000064. DOI:10.1136/ 30 Aly T, Devendra D, Barker J, et al. Heterophile antibodies mas-
lupus. querade as interferon-a in subjects with new-onset type1diabetes.
7 Arnson Y, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y. Vitamin D and autoimmunity: Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1205–1206.
New aetiological and therapeutic considerations. Ann Rheum Dis 31 Palmer P, Tovey MG, Raschilas F, et al. Type I interferon sub-
2007; 66: 1137–1142. types produced by human peripheral mononuclear cells from one
8 Boonstra A, Barrat FJ, Crain C, et al. 1-Alpha, 25-dihydroxyvita- normal donor stimulated by viral and non-viral inducing factors.
min D3 has a direct effect on naive CD4 T-cells to enhance the Eur Cytokine Netw 2007; 18: 108–114.
development of Th2 cells. J Immunol 2001; 167: 4974–4980. 32 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression
9 Bikle D. Non-classic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (Delta Delta
2009; 94: 26–34. C(T)) method. Methods 2001; 25: 402–408.
10 Kamen DL, Aranow C. The link between vitamin D deficiency and 33 Ritterhouse LL, Crowe SR, Niewold TB, et al. Vitamin D defi-
systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2008; 10: ciency is associated with an increased autoimmune response in
273–280. healthy individuals and in patients with systemic lupus erythema-
11 Ritterhouse LL, Crowe SR, Niewold TB, et al. Vitamin D defi- tosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1569–1574.
ciency is associated with an increased autoimmune response in 34 O’Regan S, Chesney RW, Hamstra A, et al. Reduced serum
healthy individuals and in patients with systemic lupus erythema- 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 levels in prednisone-treated adolescents
tosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1569–1574. with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Paediatr Scand 1979;
12 Terrier B, Derian N, Schoindre Y, et al. Restoration of regulatory 68: 109–111.
and effector T-cell balance and B-cell homeostasis in systemic 35 Monticielo OA, Brenol JC, Chies JA, et al. The role of BsmI and
lupus erythematosus patients through vitamin D supplementation. FokI vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and serum
Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14: R221. 25-hydroxyvitamin D in Brazilian patients with systemic lupus ery-
13 El Garf K, Marzouk H, Farag Y, et al. Vitamin D status in thematosus. Lupus 2012; 21: 43–52.
Egyptian patients with juvenile onset systemic lupus erythemato- 36 Kamen DL, Cooper GS, Bouali H, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in
sus. Rheumatol Int 2015; 35: 1535–1540. systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 114–117.
14 Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Olivares N, et al. Vitamin D defi- 37 Toloza SM, Cole DE, Gladman DD, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency
ciency in systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence, predictors and in a large female SLE cohort. Lupus 2010; 19: 13–19.
clinical consequences. Rheumatology 2008; 47: 920–923. 38 Gao C-C, Liu S-Y, Wu Z-Z, et al. Severe vitamin D deficiency
15 Cusack C, Danby C, Fallon JC, et al. Photoprotective behavior increases the risk for moderate to severe disease activity in
and sunscreen use: Impact on vitamin D levels in cutaneous lupus Chinese patients with SLE. Lupus 2016; 25: 1–6.
erythematosus. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2008; 24: 39 Mandal M, Tripathy R, Panda AK, et al. Vitamin D levels in
260–267. Indian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Association with
16 Sumethkul K, Boonyaratavej S, Kitumnuaypong T, et al. The pre- disease activity index and interferon alpha. Arthritis Res Ther
dictive factors of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D 2014; 16: R49.
deficiency in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. 40 Kamen DL, Cooper GS, Bouali H, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in
Rheumatol Int 2012; 33: 1461–1467. systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 114–117.
17 Akeno N, Matsunuma A, Maeda T, et al. Regulation of vitamin 41 Cutolo M, Otsa K. Review: Vitamin D, immunity and lupus. Lupus
D-1alpha-hydroxylase and -24-hydroxylase expression by dexa- 2008; 17: 6–10.
methasone in mouse kidney. J Endocrinol 2000; 164: 339–348. 42 Casella CB, Seguro LP, Takayama L, et al. Juvenile onset systemic
18 O’Leary TJ, Jones G, Yip A, et al. The effects of chloroquine on lupus erythematosus: A possible role for vitamin D in disease
serum 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and calcium metabolism in sar- status and bone health. Lupus 2012; 21: 1335–1342.
coidosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 727–730. 43 Orbach H, Zandman-Goddard G, Amital H, et al. Novel bio-
19 Niewold TB, Clark DN, Salloum R, et al. Interferon alpha in sys- markers in autoimmune diseases: Prolactin, ferritin, vitamin D,
temic lupus erythematosus. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010: 1–9. and TPA levels in autoimmune diseases. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;
20 Blanco P, Palucka AK, Gill M, et al. Induction of dendritic cell 1109: 385–400.
differentiation by IFN-a in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 44 Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Olivares N, et al. Vitamin D defi-
2001; 294: 1540–1543. ciency in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, predictors and
21 Ruuth K, Carlsson L, Hallberg B, et al. Interferon-a promotes clinical consequences. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 2047:
survival of human primary B-lymphocytes via phosphatidylinositol 920–923.
3-kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2001; 284: 583–586. 45 Mok CC, Birmingham DJ, Leung HW, et al. Vitamin D levels in
22 Yap KS, Northcott M, Hoi AB-Y, et al. Association of low Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship
vitamin D with high disease activity in an Australian systemic with disease activity, vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis.
lupus erythematosus cohort. Lupus Sci Med 2015; 2: e000064. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51: 644–652.
DOI:10.1136/lupus-2014-000064. 46 Bogaczewicz J, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Arkuszewska C, et al.
23 Griffin MD, Lutz WH, Phan VA, et al. Potent inhibition of den- Vitamin D status in systemic lupus erythematosus patients and
dritic cell differentiation and maturation by vitamin D analogs. its association with selected clinical and laboratory parameters.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 270: 701–708. Lupus 2012; 21: 477–484.
24 Schneider L, Colar da Silva AC, Werres Junior LC, et al. Vitamin 47 Petri M, Bello KJ, Fang H, et al. Vitamin D in systemic lupus
D levels and cytokine profiles in patients with systemic lupus ery- erythematosus: Modest association with disease activity and
thematosus. Lupus 2015; 24: 1191–1197. urine protein/creatinine ratio. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:
25 Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology 1865–1871.
revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythemato- 48 Toloza SM, Cole DE, Gladman DD, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency
sus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1725. in a large female SLE cohort. Lupus 2010; 19: 13–19.
26 Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythema- 49 Reynolds JA, Haque S, Berry JL, et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin D defi-
tosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 288–291. ciency is associated with increased aortic stiffness in patients with
27 Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, et al. Derivation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology(Oxford) 2012; 51:
the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. 544–551.
Lupus
IFN-a gene expression in SLE patients
SM Abdel Galil et al.
11
50 Souto MID, Coelho A, Guo C, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency in immunomodulatory activity in human monocytes. Cytokine 2009;
Brazilian patients with SLE: Prevalence, associated factors, and 45: 190–197.
relationship with activity. Lupus 2011; 20: 1019–1026. 58 Kirou AK, Lee C, George S, et al. Activation of the interferon-a
51 Mok CC. Vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematosus: An pathway identifies a subgroup of systemic lupus erythematosus
update. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2013; 9: 453–463. patients with distinct serologic features and active disease.
52 Yap KS, Morand EF. Vitamin D and systemic lupus erythemato- Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 1491–1503.
sus: Continued evolution. Int J Rheum Dis 2015; 18: 242–249. 59 Dall’Era MC, Cardarelli PM, Preston BT, et al. Type I interferon
53 Chaiamnuay S, Chailurkit L, Narongroeknawin P, et al. Current correlates with serological and clinical manifestations of SLE. Ann
daily glucocorticoid use and serum creatinine levels are associated Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1692–1697.
with lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels in Thai patients with systemic 60 Feng X, Wu H, Grossman JM, et al. Association of increased
lupus erythematosus. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19: 121–125. interferon-inducible gene expression with disease activity and
54 Gordon PL, Frassetto LA. Management of osteoporosis in CKD lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
stages 3 to 5. Am J Kidney Diseases 2010; 55: 941–956. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 2951–2962.
55 Niewold TB, Hua J, Lehman TJA, et al. High serum IFN-a activ- 61 Bennett L, Palucka AK, Arce E, et al. Interferon and granulopoi-
ity is a heritable risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus. esis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood. J Exp Med
Genes Immun 2007; 8: 492–502. 2003; 197: 711–723.
56 Ben-Zvi I, Aranow C, Mackay M, et al. The impact of vitamin D 62 Aranow C. Vitamin D and the immune system. J Investig Med
on dendritic cell function in patients with systemic lupus erythe- 2011; 59: 881–886.
matosus. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9193. 63 Castellano G, Cafiero C, Divella C, et al. Local synthesis of inter-
57 Almerighi C, Sinistro A, Cavazza A, et al. 1Alpha,25-dihydroxy- feron-alpha in lupus nephritis is associated with type I interferon
vitamin D3 inhibits CD40L-induced pro-inflammatory and signature and LMP7 induction in renal tubular epithelial cells.
Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17: 72.
Lupus