Banking in India

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

History of Banking in India

Banking in India originated in the last decades of the 18th century. The
first banks were The General Bank of India which started in 1786, and the
Bank of Hindustan, both of which are now defunct. The oldest bank in
existence in India is the State Bank of India, which originated in the Bank of
Calcutta in June 1806, which almost immediately became the Bank of
Bengal. This was one of the three presidency banks, the other two being
the Bank of Bombay and the Bank of Madras, all three of which were
established under charters from the British East India Company. For many
years the Presidency banks acted as quasi-central banks, as did their
successors. The three banks merged in 1921 to form the Imperial Bank of
India, which, upon India's independence, became the State Bank of India .

History
Indian merchants in Calcutta established the Union Bank in 1839, but it
failed in 1848 as a consequence of the economic crisis of 1848-49. The
Allahabad Bank, established in 1865 and still functioning today, is the
oldest Joint Stock bank in India.(Joint Stock Bank: A company that issues
stock and requires shareholders to be held liable for the company's debt) It
was not the first though. That honor belongs to the Bank of Upper India,
which was established in 1863, and which survived until 1913, when it
failed, with some of its assets and liabilities being transferred to the Alliance
Bank of Simla.
Foreign banks too started to arrive, particularly in Calcutta, in the 1860s.
The Comptoire d'Escompte de Paris opened a branch in Calcutta in 1860,
and another in Bombay in 1862; branches in Madras and Puducherry, then
a French colony, followed. HSBC established itself in Bengal in 1869.
Calcutta was the most active trading port in India, mainly due to the trade of
the British Empire, and so became a banking center.
The first entirely Indian joint stock bank was the Oudh Commercial Bank,
established in 1881 in Faizabad. It failed in 1958.
The next was the Punjab National Bank, established in Lahore in 1895,
which has survived to the present and is now one of the largest banks in
India.

The period between 1906 and 1911, saw the establishment of banks
inspired by the Swadeshi movement. The Swadeshi movement inspired
local businessmen and political figures to found banks of and for the Indian
community. A number of banks established then have survived to the
present such as Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Bank of
Baroda, Canara Bank and Central Bank of India.
The fervour of Swadeshi movement lead to establishing of many private
banks in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi district which were unified earlier
and known by the name South Canara ( South Kanara ) district. Four
nationalised banks started in this district and also a leading private sector
bank. Hence undivided Dakshina Kannada district is known as "Cradle of
Indian Banking".
During the First World War (1914-1918) through the end of the Second
World War (1939-1945), and two years thereafter until the independence of
India were challenging for Indian banking. The years of the First World War
were turbulent, and it took its toll with banks simply collapsing despite
theIndian economy gaining indirect boost due to war-related economic
activities. At least 94 banks in India failed between 1913 and 1918 as
indicated in the following table:
Number of
Year Authorised capital Paid-up Capital
banks
s (Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
that failed

1913 12 274 35

1914 42 710 109

1915 11 56 5

1916 13 231 4

1917 9 76 25

1918 7 209 1

Post-Independence
The partition of India in 1947 adversely impacted the economies
of Punjaband West Bengal, paralyzing banking activities for months. India's
independence marked the end of a regime of the Laissez-faire for the
Indian banking. The Government of India initiated measures to play an
active role in the economic life of the nation, and the Industrial Policy
Resolution adopted by the government in 1948 introduced a mixed
economy. This resulted into greater involvement of the state in different
segments of the economy including banking and finance. The major steps
to regulate banking included:
 The Reserve Bank of India, India's central banking authority, was
nationalized on January 1, 1949 under the terms of the Reserve Bank
of India (Transfer to Public Ownership) Act, 1948 (RBI, 2005b).
[Reference www.rbi.org.in]
 In 1949, the Banking Regulation Act was enacted which empowered
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) "to regulate, control, and inspect
the banks in India."
 The Banking Regulation Act also provided that no new bank or
branch of an existing bank could be opened without a license from
the RBI, and no two banks could have common directors.
Nationalisation

Banks Nationalisation in India: Newspaper Clipping, Times of India, July,


20, 1969
Despite the provisions, control and regulations of Reserve Bank of India,
banks in India except the State Bank of India or SBI, continued to be
owned and operated by private persons. By the 1960s, the Indian banking
industry had become an important tool to facilitate the development of
the Indian economy. At the same time, it had emerged as a large employer,
and a debate had ensued about the nationalization of the banking
industry. Indira Gandhi, then Prime Minister of India, expressed the
intention of the Government of India in the annual conference of the All
India Congress Meeting in a paper entitled "Stray thoughts on Bank
Nationalisation." The meeting received the paper with enthusiasm.
Thereafter, her move was swift and sudden. The Government of India
issued an ordinance and nationalised the 14 largest commercial banks with
effect from the midnight of July 19, 1969. Jayaprakash Narayan, a national
leader of India, described the step as a "masterstroke of political
sagacity." Within two weeks of the issue of the ordinance,
the Parliament passed the Banking Companies Bill, and it received
thepresidential approval on 9 August 1969.
A second dose of nationalization of 6 more commercial banks followed in
1980. The stated reason for the nationalization was to give the government
more control of credit delivery. With the second dose of nationalization, the
Government of India controlled around 91% of the banking business of
India. Later on, in the year 1993, the government merged New Bank of
India with Punjab National Bank. It was the only merger between
nationalized banks and resulted in the reduction of the number of
nationalised banks from 20 to 19. After this, until the 1990s, the
nationalised banks grew at a pace of around 4%, closer to the average
growth rate of the Indian economy.
Liberalisation
In the early 1990s, the then Narsimha Rao government embarked on a
policy of liberalization, licensing a small number of private banks. These
came to be known as New Generation tech-savvy banks, and included
Global Trust Bank (the first of such new generation banks to be set up),
which later amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, Axis
Bank(earlier as UTI Bank), ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank. This move, along
with the rapid growth in the economy of India, revitalized the banking sector
in India, which has seen rapid growth with strong contribution from all the
three sectors of banks, namely, government banks, private banks and
foreign banks.
The next stage for the Indian banking has been set up with the proposed
relaxation in the norms for Foreign Direct Investment, where all Foreign
Investors in banks may be given voting rights which could exceed the
present cap of 10%,at present it has gone up to 74% with some
restrictions.
The new policy shook the Banking sector in India completely. Bankers, till
this time, were used to the 4-6-4 method (Borrow at 4%;Lend at 6%;Go
home at 4) of functioning. The new wave ushered in a modern outlook and
tech-savvy methods of working for traditional banks. All this led to the retail
boom in India. People not just demanded more from their banks but also
received more.
Currently banking in India is generally fairly mature in terms of supply,
product range and reach-even though reach in rural India still remains a
challenge for the private sector and foreign banks. In terms of quality of
assets and capital adequacy, Indian banks are considered to have clean,
strong and transparent balance sheets relative to other banks in
comparable economies in its region. The Reserve Bank of India is an
autonomous body, with minimal pressure from the government. The stated
policy of the Bank on the Indian Rupee is to manage volatility but without
any fixed exchange rate-and this has mostly been true.
With the growth in the Indian economy expected to be strong for quite
some time-especially in its services sector-the demand for banking
services, especially retail banking, mortgages and investment services are
expected to be strong. One may also expect M&As, takeovers, and asset
sales.
In March 2006, the Reserve Bank of India allowed Warburg Pincus to
increase its stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank (a private sector bank) to 10%.
This is the first time an investor has been allowed to hold more than 5% in
a private sector bank since the RBI announced norms in 2005 that any
stake exceeding 5% in the private sector banks would need to be vetted by
them.
In recent years critics have charged that the non-government owned banks
are too aggressive in their loan recovery efforts in connection with housing,
vehicle and personal loans. There are press reports that the banks' loan
recovery efforts have driven defaulting borrowers to suicide. ]

You might also like