Jawaban CG TM 7
Jawaban CG TM 7
Discussion Questions
1. “The public trust in auditors’ judgments and reputation is vital in regarding the
audit function as value-added services that lend credibility to published financial
reports.” Do you agree or disagree with the given statement? Explain your answer.
The audit function is considered value-added when it lends credibility to published
financial statements by reducing the information risk associated with those statements.
When auditors provide assurance services, they are providing their opinion by
utilizing their professional judgment. Public trust in such a judgment depends on the
reputation of the auditor and the firm with which he or she is employed. If the public
does not trust the reputation of the firm or the judgment of the auditor, questions may
arise regarding the accuracy of the object of assurance. Thus, if the auditor or firm is
considered to be untrustworthy, their services may not be considered value-added or
helpful to the organization or its stakeholders.
2. According to the author, an auditor has two responsibilities: to express and opine on
the true and fair presentation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP, and at
the same time, to assess the quality of the reports. Do you feel it is possible for an auditor
to discharge both duties? Explain your answer.
This audit function can be achieved by improving the following: (1) the auditor
selection and client acceptance process; (2) audit quality and its relation to audit fees;
(3) evidence-gathering procedures; (4) the integrated audit approach; (5) auditor
independence; (6) audit and nonaudit services; and (7) the audit opinion.
3. Confidence and public trust in auditors have been reduced due the concern that
auditors serve the interests of management who write their checks rather than the
shareholders who eventually pay their fees. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your
answer.
The wave of financial scandals along with financial restatements by high-profile
public companies and related audit failures eroded public trust and investor confidence
in financial reports and audit functions. Many concerns have been raised regarding the
challenges confronting the accounting profession in the aftermath of these scandals
and the related regulatory responses. Since the passage of SOX, the audit committee is
responsible for compensating the audit firm rather than management. Hopefully this
and other measures will improve corporate governance and thus boost investor
confidence and public trust in auditors.
4. Explain the importance of public accounting firms in a capital market.
Auditors attest to the statements of management, within material respects, giving
credibility to management’s statements and allowing stakeholders to make decisions
regarding with reasonably accurate management representations. If the representations
of management were not seen as credible, investors and other stakeholders could not
rely on information from management. This would lead to inefficient markets and a
volatile economy. Thus, the services of public accounting firms are important to the
function of the markets and the economy through reducing information risk associated
with the information disseminated to the capital markets.
5. Do you think it is right to eliminate incentives that cause auditor self-serving biases
in order to improve the quality of the audit? Substantiate your answer.
Eliminating any conflicts of interest the auditor may experience is helpful in
improving the quality of the audit. This improves the auditor’s objectivity, and also
aids in establishing the auditor’s credibility. When auditor objectivity is enhanced, the
quality of the audit is improved.
6. Is there any difference between tax planning and abusive tax shelters? Explain your
point of view.
There is no standard or law defining the term “tax shelter” or differentiating between
“tax planning,” which is a legitimate means of reducing tax liability, and “abusive tax
shelter,” which is illegal. Nonetheless, abusive tax shelters are characterized as
“transactions in which a significant purpose is the avoidance or evasion of federal,
state, or local tax in a manner not intended by the law.”
7. Explain why auditor independence is backbone of the auditing profession.
Auditor independence lends credibility to the auditor and maintains a solid reputation
for the firm in which he or she is employed. If auditor independence is impaired, the
reputation of the auditor and the auditing firm could be placed in jeopardy due to legal
actions taken by regulatory bodies against the firm and decreased confidence in audit
reports issued by the firm.
8. Explain how internal auditors are important in performing the integrated audit.
Effective communication between the audit committee, internal auditors, and other
corporate governance participants is an important part of the integrated audit process.
The audit committee should meet with the company’s CFO, internal auditor,
independent auditor, and legal counsel to discuss the integrated audit of annual
financial statements, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
ICFR, auditor report on management’s assessment, and audit of annual financial
statements, to evaluate the overall integrity and quality of financial reports before they
are filed or distributed.
9. Do you think auditors are solely responsible for any audit failure? What steps would
you, as an auditor, take to ensure that you are minimally blamed for a business failure?
Auditors may not always be solely to blame for audit failures, since unethical behavior
and earnings management schemes may sometimes be kept hidden from auditors even
when due diligence is used in the audit process. However, sometimes auditors may
look the other way when fraud is perpetrated by members of the audited organization.
In such cases, the auditors would be responsible for the audit failure. Auditors can
practice due diligence and take steps to enhance independence from the client to
decrease the occurrence of possible audit failures.
10. “Critics argue that any contractual provisions that limit the external auditor’s
liability or require waiving the right to a jury trial may have detrimental effects on
auditor impartiality, objectivity, and quality.” Express your views on the given
statement.
Some may argue that auditor liability should be limited on the grounds that such a
limitation could protect auditors from the consequences of auditing an organization
that has engaged in fraudulent activities or unethical behavior without catching such
activity. Others may argue that a limitation of auditor liability would result in
decreased audit quality, since the consequences of providing the wrong opinion are
lessened.
11. Discuss briefly the steps established by the PCAOB for its inspection process.
The inspection process consists of: (1) selecting audit clients based on the PCAOB’s
assessment of the likelihood of material misstatements or significant audit
deficiencies; (2) reviewing aspects of the selected audits by each firm; (3) choosing
the engagements to review according to the PCAOB’s criteria; (4) retraining the
accounting firm to limit or influence the engagement selection process or any other
aspect of inspection review; (5) reviewing the selected audit clients’ financial
statements and certain SEC filings; (6) selecting certain higher-risk areas for review
(e.g. revenue recognition, confirmation); (7) reviewing the selected areas of revenues,
reserves or estimated liability, income taxes, related party transactions, derivatives,
supervision of work performed by foreign affiliates, internal control assessment and
documentation, and risk assessment; (8) analyzing end-of-the year closing and
adjusting entries, particularly adjustments that were suggested by the auditor and were
not booked by the client; (9) reviewing written communications between the auditor
and the client’s management; (10) reviewing written communication between the
auditor and the client’s audit committee; (11) conducting an interview with the
chairperson of the audit committee of the selected audit client; (12) discussing
unresolved aspects of the inspection process with the personnel from the firm’s
national offices if the issues cannot be resolved through review of work papers and
discussion with the engagement team; (13) selecting additional audits if necessary to
follow leads to the root of audit deficiencies (e.g., other audits performed by the same
audit partner or engagement team); (14) reviewing other work performed by internal
reviewers who missed the reviewed partner’s errors; (15) identifying and resolving
audit deficiencies and problems early in their development; (16) inviting the public
accounting firm to comment on the discovered potential material accounting errors
and significant audit deficiencies; (17) discussing the discovered audit problems with
audit firm representatives including members of the engagement team, the firm
representative responsible for the inspection process, national office experts, the
managing partner, or the firm’s CEO; (18) addressing audit problems, lack of
performing necessary audit procedures, and quality control requirements; (19)
disclosing the public portion of the inspection report on the PCAOB Web site; and
(20) disclosing the nonpublic portion of the inspection report primarily regarding the
firm’s quality control system and other PCAOB communication to the audit firm and
out of public view unless the firm fails to take proper action to correct the identified
audit failures in due time.
12. Explain the importance of auditor independence in the auditing profession and to
society and the investing community.
Auditor independence establishes and maintains the credibility of the auditing
profession, and instills confidence in the investing community and society regarding
the work of audit professionals. Confidence in the work of audit professionals may
dwindle if such independence were impaired, calling into question the value-adding
nature of such audit services.
13. How do external auditors lend credibility to the corporate governance structure?
The independent auditor assurance function provides reasonable assurance that
financial statements are free from material misstatements due to error and fraud, and
expresses an opinion on the fair presentation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP. Registered auditors are also required to express an opinion on
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the design and operation of ICFR as
well as an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control itself. The auditor assurance
function is intended to lend credibility to financial reports and reduce information risk
that financial reports are biased, misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete.
True or False
1. According to modern company law, effective reporting and accounting are essential for
effective governance.
2. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that companies offering stock to the public
in raising capital must have their financial statements audited by an independent public
accountant.
3. Corporate governance reforms do not mandate external auditors to be independent.
4. The IAASB defines reasonable assurance as absolute in nature.
5. Technical competencies are considered to be the auditors’ knowledge of relevant
professional standards, rules, laws, and regulations.
6. Reporting competencies are the auditor’s ability to choose appropriate evidence-gathering
procedures.
7. When considering the audit function as a value-added service, public trust in auditors’
judgments and reputation is very important.
8. One of the primary purposes of corporate governance reforms is to improve the quality
and credibility of financial statement audits and audit reports.
9. One of the missions of the CPCAF is to provide leadership through sponsoring public
forums and periodic meetings with interested groups.
10. Ethics education is sufficient to have an impact on bias.
11. The nature and extent of management’s documentation of internal controls in providing
reasonable support for management’s assessment plays an important role in performing tests
of controls.
12. PCAOB standards allow public accounting firms to provide tax shelter services to their
audit clients that impair their independence.
13. Conducting an interview with the chairperson of the audit committee of the selected audit
client is part of the inspection process followed by the PCAOB.
14. The audit committee is directly responsible for hiring and compensating the company’s
independent auditor.
15. Independent auditors can gather information not provided by management through
inquiries of the audit committee.
16. Communications from the audit committee to the independent auditor do not include
formal approval of audit and permissible nonaudit services.
17. SOX, SEC-related rules, and PCAOB standards are intended to strengthen auditor
independence by linking audit partner compensation to audit quality and not to revenues
received.
18. The evidence-gathering phase requires an auditor to review work papers to ensure that the
audit was conducted in accordance with PCAOB audit standards.
19. The materiality concept has an important role in assessing the reasonableness of
accounting estimates.
20. Public companies are exempted from filing the 11-K report with the SEC.
21. When an independent auditor issues an adverse opinion indicating that there is a material
weakness in internal control, a stand-alone audit engagement may be desired.
True or False
1. True
2. True
3. False
4. False
5. True
6. False
7. True
8. True
9. True
10. False
11. True
12. False
13. True
14. True
15. True
16. False
17. True
18. True
19. True
20. False
21. True