The Experimental Research On The Formability of Low Carbon Steel Sheet
The Experimental Research On The Formability of Low Carbon Steel Sheet
The Experimental Research On The Formability of Low Carbon Steel Sheet
Abstract
1. Introduction
Oliveira et al. (2005) explained that Sheet metal forming processes often involve high
rates of deformation. Electromagnetic pulse forming (magnetic pulse forming),hydro
forming and explosive forming are obvious examples, but also in more conventional
sheet forming techniques, such as deep drawing, roll forming and bending, locally high
strain rates occur deviating from those used in static material tests. Mala Seth et al.
(2005) reported thathigh velocity deformation can be quite effective in increasing
theforming limits of metal sheets as well as effectively treating some other common
metal forming problems, such as wrinkling and distortion. This study examines the
highvelocity formability of cold rolled sheet steel as developed in impact with a curved
punch.
T.B. Stoughton et al. (2000) revealed a fundamental problem in sheet metal
forming is fracturing. It is therefore essential to be able to predict the risk of fracture
270 Salunkhe Ujwala Sunil & K. Baba Pai
with high accuracy. The forming limit curve (FLC) is the most commonly used
fracture criterion for sheet metal forming applications. New fracture criterions have
been developed but no one has yet come to general practical use in the automotive
industry. In this paper, discussion about the formability of CRCA sheet for transformer
radiator fin sheet is evaluated.
2. Experimental Details
2.1 Material and sample preparation
The materials used for research are CR1, CR2, CR3, and CR4. The chemical
composition of these four samples tested by Spectro Chemical Analysis as per
specification of Indian Standard 513 of 2008 Edition and the results are shown in
Table1.
High strength cold rolled steel having low carbon is continuously annealed at the
temperature of 750ºC to produce uniform strength. The holding time should be not less
than 20 sec. The preferable range is 20 sec to 3min.CR1 is a commercial(ordinary)
quality “O” grade as per Indian standard:513 2008 specifications. CR2 is a drawing
quality “D” grade as per Indian standard: 513 2008 specifications. CR3 is a deep
drawing Quality “DD” grade as per Indian standard: 513 2008 specifications.CR4 is an
extra deep drawing quality “EDD” grade as per Indian standard: 513 2008
specifications.
The Erichsen cupping test is a ductility test, which is employed to evaluate the
ability of metallic sheets and strips to undergo plastic deformation in stretch forming.
The test consists of forming an indentation by pressing a punch with a spherical end
against a test piece clamped between a blank holder and a die, until a through crack
appears. The depth of the cup is measured. The depth of cup is proportional to the
formability of sheet metal. As shown in figure1, sheet metals of selected samples are
clamped between blank holder and die until a crack appears. And it will indicate
formability of these samples.
Coarse initial grain size had a great influence on the microstructure, hardness of
low carbon steel. Grain size number below ASTM number 3 represents definitely
coarse grained steel and above ASTM number 6 represents reasonably fine grained
steel. Fig.2 is showing microstructure related with the samples CR1, CR2, CR3 and
CR4 respectively.
Table 2 reveals the results related to the microstructure shown in Fig. 2. CR1 and
CR4 are showing higher grain size compared to other samples. The samples which are
higher hardness are showing less ductility
272 Salunkhe Ujwala Sunil & K. Baba Pai
Fine grain size is also reflection of hardness.CR3 and CR4 are showing similar
grain size but CR4 is having less hardness.CR4 is having better ductility compared to
other two samples. Because of less grain size, CR4 is subjected to higher ductility.
As CRCA material is used for transformer radiator fin sheet forming and
automobile industry in which car body is manufactured. For such application
formability of material is having vital role. Because of Enrichsen cupping, it easy to
evaluate the formability of cold rolled and closed annealed sheet metal of various
grads. After performing the cupping test, CR4 is showing excellent formability which
will be desirable material for given application.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 3: Specimen after Test (a) CR1, (b) CR2, (c) CR3, (d) CR4
4. Conclusion
1. Carbon percentage is less in CR4 other than three samples because of less grain
in unit area as compared to other three samples.
2. The grain size of CR4 material is smaller than the other steels indicating bigger
size of grain with low grain boundary area making the material ductile with
less week spots.
3. Large surface area of grain and less boundary area confirm that CR4 is more
soft and ductile in nature as compared to other three samples.
4. Fine grain structures give more grain boundaries and hence development of
internal stress whereas a CR4 has better stress relief property because of less
number of grains.
5. Better formability in CR4 as compared to other three samples and therefore
more depth in forming can be achieved.
References
[1] Mala Seth, Vincent J. Vohnout, Glenn S. Daehn, Formability of steel sheet in
high velocity impact, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 168 (2005)
390–400.
274 Salunkhe Ujwala Sunil & K. Baba Pai
[2] Oliveira, D.A., Worswick, M.J., Finn, M., Newman, D., 2005.
Electromagnetic forming of aluminium alloy sheet: free-form and cavity fill
experiments and model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 170, 350–362.
[3] T.B. Stoughton, A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming, Int.
J. Mech. Sci. 42 (2000) 1–27.)