Article in Press: Sarcopenia
Article in Press: Sarcopenia
Article in Press: Sarcopenia
Available online at
ScienceDirect
www.sciencedirect.com
Review
Sarcopenia
Anne Tournadre a,c,∗ , Gaelle Vial a,c , Frédéric Capel c , Martin Soubrier a,c , Yves Boirie b,c
a
Service de rhumatologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 58, rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
b
Service de nutrition clinique, hôpital G.-Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
c
Unité de Nutrition Humaine, UMR1019 INRA, université Clermont-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Sarcopenia is defined as a combination of low muscle mass with low muscle function. The term was
Accepted 5 June 2018 first used to designate the loss of muscle mass and performance associated with aging. Now, recognized
Available online xxx causes of sarcopenia also include chronic disease, a physically inactive lifestyle, loss of mobility, and
malnutrition. Sarcopenia should be differentiated from cachexia, which is characterized not only by low
Keywords: muscle mass but also by weight loss and anorexia. Sarcopenia results from complex and interdependent
Sarcopenia pathophysiological mechanisms that include aging, physical inactivity, neuromuscular compromise,
Muscle
resistance to postprandial anabolism, insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, endocrine factors, oxidative stress,
Fat mass
mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation. The prevalence of sarcopenia ranges from 3% to 24%
depending on the diagnostic criteria used and increases with age. Among patients with rheumatoid
arthritis 20% to 30% have sarcopenia, which correlates with disease severity. Sarcopenia exacts a
heavy toll of functional impairment, metabolic disorders, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
Thus, the consequences of sarcopenia include disability, quality of life impairments, falls, osteoporosis,
dyslipidemia, an increased cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, and immunosuppression. The
adverse effects of sarcopenia are particularly great in patients with a high fat mass, a condition
known as sarcopenic obesity. The diagnosis of sarcopenia rests on muscle mass measurements and on
functional tests that evaluate either muscle strength or physical performance (walking, balance). No
specific biomarkers have been identified to date. The management of sarcopenia requires a multimodal
approach combining a sufficient intake of high-quality protein and fatty acids, physical exercise, and
antiinflammatory medications. Selective androgen receptor modulators and anti-myostatin antibodies
are being evaluated as potential stimulators of muscle anabolism.
© 2018 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
1297-319X/© 2018 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
G Model
BONSOI-4764; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 A. Tournadre et al. / Joint Bone Spine xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
Fig. 2. The postprandial anabolic resistance concept: the postprandial anabolic peak
pic is blunted in patients with anabolic resistance, resulting in a negative protein
2. Mechanisms
balance.
The decrease in the mass of muscle protein is the net result of 3. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction
an imbalance between protein synthesis (anabolism) and proteol-
ysis (catabolism). Protein synthesis requires an adequate supply of Sarcopenia is associated with loss of muscle mitochondria and
amino acids from the diet or from proteolytic processes. Anabolism mitochondrial enzymes, mitochondrial DNA mutations and, even-
is triggered chiefly by the intracellular insulin signaling pathway tually, alterations in fatty acid beta-oxidation and in the function
and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor pathway (IGF- of the mitochondrial respiratory chain that produces energy in the
1/AKT/mTOR), which also inhibit proteolysis. Catabolism involves form of ATP. Together with impairments in cellular antioxidant
many specific proteolytic pathways, including the ATP-dependent properties, this age-related mitochondrial dysfunction contributes
ubiquitin-proteasome complex, which is influenced by multiple to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which alter
factors (inadequate nutrient intake, physical inactivity, hormone the function of myofibrils, motor neurons, and the sarcoplas-
deficiencies, and proinflammatory cytokines). The main finding mic reticulum and impair muscle regeneration [7]. Increased ROS
from studies on this topic is that aging is related, not to a basal dis- levels indicating exacerbated oxidative stress correlate with loss
order in protein renewal, but to a blunting of the anabolic response of handgrip strength in older women [7]. The decline in mito-
to food intake known as postprandial anabolic resistance (Fig. 2). chondrial oxidative capacity can also promote lipid accumulation
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
G Model
BONSOI-4764; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Tournadre et al. / Joint Bone Spine xxx (2018) xxx–xxx 3
Table 1
Criteria and cutoffs used to diagnose sarcopenia.
Muscle mass
DXA SMI kg/m2 ≤ 7.26 (M) LM total kg SMI kg/m2 ≤ 7.23 (M) SMI kg/m2 ≤ 6.81 (M) LMApp kg < 19.75 (M)
≤ 5.54 (F) ≤ 5.67 (F) ≤ 5.18 (F) < 15.02 (F) LMApp /BMI
< 0.789 (M) < 0.512 (F)
Muscular function
Handgrip kg BMI – – – < 26 kg (M) < 16 kg (F)
kg/BMI < 1 (M) < 0.56 (F)
Walking speed < 0.8 m/s < 0.8 m/s < 1 m/s < 1 m/s 6MWT< 400 m –
Timed get-up-and-go test > 10 s – – – –
EWGSOP: European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (Cruz-Jentoft et al., 2010); ESPEN SIG: Special Interest Group “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting
diseases” (Muscaritoli et al., 2010); IWGS: International Working Group on Sarcopenia (Fielding et al., 2011); Sarcopenia with limited mobility: Society for Sarcopenia
Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (Morley et al., 2011); FNIH Sarcopenia project (Studenski et al., 2014); LM: lean mass; App: appendicular; SMI: skeletal muscle mass index;
BMI: body mass index; 6MWT: 6-minute walking test; M: male; F: female.
within skeletal muscle even when the dietary fat intake remains of dependency [28]. Sarcopenia is associated with a 50% increase
unchanged. in the risk of admission, a 20-day increase in hospital stay length,
and a 34% to 58% increase in hospital care costs [29,30].
3.1. Inflammation About 20% to 30% of patients with RA have a decrease in muscle
mass [18,31]. Loss of muscle mass correlates with disease severity,
Elevated levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6, and TNF␣ may pro- disease activity, and quality of life [32–34]. Although loss of mobil-
mote muscle loss and are associated in older individuals with ity is usually ascribed to the joint involvement, it explains only 20%
declines in muscle mass and muscle strength [15]. IL-6 overex- of the decrease in walking speed. Body composition is the other
pression in transgenic mice induces muscle wasting, which can be major determinant [35]. The alterations in walking ability, quality
reversed by administering an IL-6 receptor antagonist [16]. TNF␣ of life, and self-sufficiency are even more marked in patients with
injection in mice activates the proteolytic pathways, notably those sarcopenic obesity [28,34,35]. Changes in the ratio of lean mass
involving the proteasome, and impairs muscle function [17]. In over fat mass are probably also involved in the development of the
patients with RA, IL-6 inhibition by tocilizumab is associated with cardiometabolic comorbidities seen in RA. Thus, a low body mass
lean mass gains, whereas fat mass does not increase [18]. The data index (BMI) is associated with increases in the risks of cardiovas-
on TNF␣ antagonists are less consistent [18]. cular disease [36] and metabolic syndrome, whereas the opposite
A single study assessed the anabolic muscle response after meals is true in the general population [37]. That muscle, fat, and bone
and after exercise [19]. The patients had RA without sarcopenia. No tissues are closely linked has been suggested for several years but
differences were found with matched controls [19]. Insulin resis- remains controversial. In a prospective 3-year cohort study of 65-
tance is also associated with RA. Both proinflammatory cytokines year-old retirees in Switzerland, sarcopenia was associated with a
(IL-6, TNF␣) and glucocorticoids promote insulin resistance in RA 2.3-fold increase in the risk of osteoporotic fracture after adjust-
[20]. Oxidative stress contributes to skeletal muscle dysfunction ment on age, gender, and the FRAX score [38]. Nevertheless, in a
in animal models of collagen-induced arthritis [21]. Rats with cohort of women in the US, bone mineral density (BMD) was the
collagen-induced arthritis exhibit protein metabolism alterations, main determinant of the fracture risk, which was not increased by
fatty acid accumulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as the presence of sarcopenia [39]. Muscle mass loss in patients with
muscle wasting, supporting the hypothesis that joint inflammation RA is associated with a BMD decrease at the hip but not with the
is associated with muscle lipotoxicity [22]. Among hormonal fac- fracture risk [40].
tors, myostatin is regulated during chronic inflammation and may
therefore be involved in inflammatory sarcopenia via its catabolic 5. Diagnosis
effects [23].
The EWGSOP diagnostic criteria perform best in predicting the
4. Epidemiology and impact of sarcopenia on health fall risk. Both muscle mass and muscle strength or physical perfor-
mance must be measured [1,24,25] (Box 1).
The prevalence of sarcopenia varies across populations and
according to the definitions and cutoffs used. Prevalences of 3% to
24% have thus been reported in individuals older than 65 years [24] Box 1
Criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia (EWGSOP)a
(Table 1). Using the criteria and cutoffs defined by the European
Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) [25], the Low muscle mass Anthropometry Arm muscle area ≤ 21.4 cm2 in males,
prevalence is 7.1% when both loss of muscle mass and loss of mus- ≤ 21.6 cm2 in females Bioimpedance analysis SMI < 8.87 kg/m2 in
males, < 6.42 kg/m2 in females FFMI ≤ 17 kg/m2 in males, ≤ 15 kg/m2 in
cle function are required and 11% when only the muscle mass loss
females Computed tomography at L3 Lumbar SMI < 55 cm2 /m2 in
criterion is required [24]. males, < 39 cm2 /m2 in females Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Sarcopenia has major adverse effects on function, metabolism, Appendicular SMI < 7.26 kg/m2 in males, < 5.45 kg/m2 in females
morbidity, and mortality. Thus, sarcopenia is associated with func- Low muscle strength Handgrip strength: varies with BMI and gender
tional disabilities, quality of life impairments, falls, osteoporosis, Males: BMI ≤ 24, 29 kg; 24 < BMI ≤ 28, 30 kg; BMI ≥ 29, 32 kg Females:
BMI ≤ 23, 17 kg; 23 < BMI ≤ 26, 17.3 kg; 26 < BMI ≤ 29, 18 kg; BMI > 29,
dyslipidemia, an increased cardiovascular risk, metabolic syn- 21 kg
drome, and immunosuppression. Both muscle mass and muscle Low physical performance usual gait speed (< 0.8 m/s) timed get-up-and-go
function (strength, walking speed) are independently associated test > 10 s Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
with mortality [2,26,27]. Decreases in both muscle mass and mus- a
EWGSOP defines sarcopenia as at least one muscle mass criterion plus at least
cle function are associated with a 3.7-fold increase in mortality [26] one muscle strength or physical performance criterion. SMI: skeletal muscle mass
and a 2-fold increase in the fall risk [24], as well as with a greater risk index; FFMI: fat-free mass index.
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
G Model
BONSOI-4764; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
4 A. Tournadre et al. / Joint Bone Spine xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
Muscle mass can be estimated using a simple anthropomet- inflammation and nutritional status (hemoglobin, albumin, CRP,
ric method that consists in computing the corrected arm muscle IL-6, TNF␣), oxidative stress (protein carbonylation, oxidized LDL),
area after measuring the triceps skinfold thickness [41]. Although and hormonal status (testosterone, IGF-1, DHEA, vitamin D). None
few studies have assessed the performance and reproducibility of these markers is specific of sarcopenia. The serum creatinine
of anthropometric methods, the corrected arm muscle area per- level reflects the muscle mass in individuals whose renal func-
formed better than BMI in predicting mortality [41]. Bioimpedance tion is normal. A low serum creatinine level is associated with an
analysis (BIA) is an inexpensive alternative to dual-energy X-ray increase in mortality [44]. Serum creatinine could be used in com-
absorptiometry (DXA) for obtaining an immediate measurement bination with another renal function marker, cystatin, to define a
of lean mass but does not directly evaluate the muscle and bone sarcopenia index [44]. Circulating free nucleic acids, procollagens,
compartments. BIA values vary with the degree of hydration of agrin, myokines, and proteomic parameters are being evaluated as
the individual, have not been validated in patients with chronic biomarkers for sarcopenia.
diseases, and underestimate lean mass. DXA is currently the inves-
tigation of reference for evaluating total body composition. DXA
provides measurements of muscle mass, fat mass, and bone mass. 6. Management of sarcopenia
DXA results can be used to compute the skeletal muscle mass
index (SMI) by normalizing the lean mass of the four limbs to A healthy diet and sufficient physical activity are the main deter-
either height (in Europe) [1,25] or BMI (in the US) [42]. SMI cutoffs minants of energy homeostasis and body composition changes.
relative to a standard population have been determined for sar- Inflammation, insulin resistance, and physical inactivity promote
copenia. Although DXA is the method of reference for accurately fat deposition, anabolic resistance, and lipotoxicity within the
measuring body compartments and determining whether fat tis- sarcopenic muscle. Sarcopenia therefore requires a multimodal
sue is located in the subcutaneous or visceral compartment, it is management approach combining a nutritional strategy targeting
a global, projected, two-dimensional technique that does not take nutrient quality and intake, exercise, and antiinflammatory and
into account any possible interactions among tissue types. Com- anabolic medications.
puted tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine with slices at the level
of L3 followed by image analysis using dedicated software pro- 6.1. Nutrition
vides an estimate of lumbar skeletal muscle mass (psoas, rectus
abdominis, external oblique, and paraspinal muscles). Peripheral In patients with age-related sarcopenia who are older than
quantitative CT (pQCT) is a more recently developed tool that 65 years, the daily recommended protein intake is 1 to 1.2 g/kg/day
is used in clinical research. With pQCT, three-dimensional trans- instead of 0.8 g/kg/day [45]. Protein supplements, notably essen-
verse slices can be obtained at all four limbs and used to assess tial amino acid supplements including leucine may benefit muscle
bone mass, muscle mass, and muscle density in the same vol- mass and function, although the benefits are inconsistent [46]. The
ume. rates of digestion and absorption, the modalities of protein intake
Handgrip strength is used as a measure of muscle strength. throughout the day, and the synergistic effects of protein with
Available tools for assessing physical performance include walking physical exercise or other nutrients are key determinants of the
speed measurement, the step-on-stool test, or the Short Physi- effectiveness of the protein intake [47].
cal Performance Battery (SPPB) combining a measure of balance, Vitamin D diminished lipotoxicity and exerted anabolic effects
walking speed, and the get-up-and-go test [25]. A sarcopenia on muscle in animal studies [48]. In males older than 65 years,
screening questionnaire (SARC-F) can be helpful in patients older when used in combination with leucine-enriched whey protein for
than 65 years [1]. 6 weeks, vitamin D supplementation increased both postprandial
A broad spectrum of phenotypes is associated with sarcopenia, protein synthesis and muscle mass [49]. Supplemental n-3 polyun-
ranging from loss of both muscle mass and fat mass (cachexia and saturated fatty acids (omega-3) or monounsaturated fatty acids
pre-cachexia) to absence of weight loss or even weight gain (sar- contributed to decrease insulin resistance and lipotoxicity [50];
copenic obesity). Criteria for evaluating the severity of sarcopenia prevented fat mass increases; and improved protein anabolism,
have been developed [25]. Presarcopenia is characterized by low muscle mass, and muscle function [51].
muscle mass that has no impact on muscle strength or physical Appetite stimulants have been tested more specifically in
performance. Sarcopenia is defined as low muscle mass combined patients with cachexia. Examples include megestrol acetate, a pro-
with loss of muscle strength or physical performance. Severe sar- gestin medication, which can be given alone or with L-carnitine;
copenia is low muscle mass with both low muscle strength and low thalidomide, and ghrelin.
physical performance. Obesity or sarcopenic obesity can be defined
as low muscle mass as assessed using DXA (SMI) combined with a
fat mass greater than 28% in males and 40% in females. Sarcopenic 6.2. Physical activity
obesity precedes and predicts loss of self-sufficiency, whereas nei-
ther obesity alone nor sarcopenia alone is independently associated Even low-level physical activity induces decreases in the car-
with loss of self-sufficiency [28]. Nevertheless, these methods are diovascular risk, insulin resistance, and mortality [52,53]. Physical
neither readily available in everyday practice nor reimbursed by the activity diminishes lipotoxicity by increasing mitochondrial fatty-
French statutory health system. Furthermore, they do not allow a acid beta-oxidation by muscle cells and increases the synthesis
noninvasive or minimally invasive assessment of fatty infiltrates of muscle protein. Exercise benefits muscle strength and physi-
within muscle tissue [1,25]. This is regrettable, as muscle quality, cal performance but does not consistently increase muscle mass
which results from body composition, muscle function, and muscle [46]. The optimal exercise modalities and the patient subgroups
fat content is a far better marker of both loss of mobility and mor- most likely to benefit remain to be determined. Ideally, a physi-
tality [3]. In oncology, muscle quality is recognized as a predictor cal training program should combine aerobic exercise to improve
of survival [43]. cardiovascular function and endurance and to decrease fat mass
The complex and multifactorial pathophysiology of sarcopenia with strength exercises to increase muscle mass [54]. In RA, phys-
is a major obstacle to identifying a specific biomarker that would ical exercise programs should be individually tailored to disease
be easily available and would reflect both muscle mass and mus- stage, disease activity, and general health status. Intensive exercise
cle function. The most widely cited markers reflect the level of programs designed to increase muscle mass and muscle strength
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
G Model
BONSOI-4764; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Tournadre et al. / Joint Bone Spine xxx (2018) xxx–xxx 5
often raise difficulties with implementation and patient adher- require investigations into the mechanisms underlying sarcopenia
ence. in patients with inflammatory conditions and reduced mobility. In
addition, readily available and noninvasive biomarkers are needed
6.3. Biotherapies to ensure the early identification of patients at high risk for sar-
copenia. Treatment targets will need to be validated. Preventive
The metabolic effects of cytokine antagonists, notably on mus- and curative strategies combining nutrition optimization, physical
cle anabolism, remain controversial and require further study. activity, and long-term targeted medications will have to be devel-
In several studies, TNF␣ antagonist or IL-6 antagonist therapy oped. The recommendations and diagnostic tools discussed in this
was associated with weight gain in patients with RA or spondy- article apply to age-related sarcopenia. These data must now be val-
loarthritis (SpA). Although body composition changes have been idated in patients with chronic inflammatory joint disease in order
documented in treated patients, few data are available on muscle to establish decision algorithms and clinical practice guidelines for
strength and function, changes in energy expenditure and physical identifying, preventing, or delaying the onset of sarcopenia.
activity, and dietary intakes. The data should therefore be inter-
preted with caution. Body composition does not seem to change in
the short term in patients with RA treated with TNF␣ antagonists, Disclosure of interest
although an increase in fat mass has been reported after 2 years of
treatment [55–57]. IL-6 antagonist therapy may hold promise for The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
the treatment of cachexia in patients with cancer [58]. After 1 year
of RA treatment with the IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab, patients had
gained weight due to an increase in lean mass with no increase References
in fat mass but with a redistribution of adipose tissue toward the
subcutaneous compartment [18]. In patients with SpA, TNF␣ antag- [1] Biolo G, Cederholm T, Muscaritoli M. Muscle contractile and metabolic dys-
function is a common feature of sarcopenia of aging and chronic diseases: from
onist therapy may increase the fat mass and induce redistribution sarcopenic obesity to cachexia. Clin Nutr 2014;33:737–48.
of adipose tissue toward the visceral compartment [57,59]. [2] Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is asso-
ciated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:72–7.
6.4. Anabolic medications [3] Fabbri E, Chiles Shaffer N, Gonzalez-Freire M, et al. Early body composition, but
not body mass, is associated with future accelerated decline in muscle quality.
Testosterone supplementation seems to have little efficacy in J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017;8:490–9.
[4] Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognized as an independent condition by an
increasing muscle mass and is associated with adverse effects International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification
including cardiovascular events, prostate cancer, and viriliza- (ICD-10-CM) Code. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:675–7.
tion [60]. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) exert [5] Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argilés J, et al. Consensus definition of sarcope-
nia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest
anabolic effects on bone and muscle but not on the other tissues.
Groups (SIG) “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in
SARMs improved muscle mass and muscle function in phase II stud- geriatrics.”. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl 2010;29:154–9.
ies in older individuals and patients with cancer [61,62]. Phase II [6] van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Konijn NP, et al. Relevance of the new
studies of SARMs are ongoing (NCT01355484). Estrogens have little pre-cachexia and cachexia definitions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Clin Nutr 2012;31:1008–10.
effect, notably in women older than 60 years. [7] Mitchell WK, Williams J, Atherton P, et al. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the
GH has produced disappointing effects in older patients. GH impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quan-
increases muscle mass but also induces salt and water retention titative review. Front Physiol 2012;3:260.
[8] Kortebein P, Ferrando A, Lombeida J, et al. Effect of 10 days of bed rest on skeletal
and fails to improve muscle strength [63]. Creatine supplemen- muscle in healthy older adults. JAMA 2007;297:1772–4.
tation has controversial effects. When combined with physical [9] Wall BT, Dirks ML, Snijders T, et al. Substantial skeletal muscle loss occurs
exercise, creatine supplementation may improve both muscle mass during only 5 days of disuse. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2014;210:600–11.
[10] Guillet C, Prod’homme M, Balage M, et al. Impaired anabolic response of muscle
and muscle strength [64]. Myostatin regulates muscle growth, and protein synthesis is associated with S6K1 dysregulation in elderly humans.
myostatin inhibition using a monoclonal antibody may constitute a FASEB J 2004;84:6017–24.
targeted treatment for sarcopenia [65]. A single monthly subcuta- [11] Dardevet D, Sornet C, Balage M, et al. Stimulation of in vitro rat muscle protein
synthesis by leucine decreases with age. J Nutr 2000;130:2630–5.
neous injection of myostatin inhibitor improved muscle mass and [12] Boirie Y, Gachon P, Cordat N, et al. Differential insulin sensitivities of glu-
decreased fat mass. Nevertheless, the effects on muscle function cose, amino acid, and albumin metabolism in elderly men and women. J Clin
were discordant, and no improvements occurred in the 6-minute Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:638–44.
[13] Guillet C, Delcourt I, Rance M, et al. Changes in basal and insulin and amino
walking test, muscle strength, or the fall risk. Additional clinical
acid response of whole body and skeletal muscle proteins in obese men. J Clin
trials are under way, notably with metformin (NCT02308228) and Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:3044–50.
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ISRCTN90094835) in [14] Tardif N, Salles J, Guillet C, et al. Muscle ectopic fat deposition contributes to
combination with either physical activity or leucine supplemen- anabolic resistance in obese sarcopenic old rats through eIF2␣ activation. Aging
Cell 2014;13:1001–11.
tation. [15] Schaap LA, Pluijm SMF, Deeg DJH, et al. Inflammatory markers and loss of
muscle mass (sarcopenia) and strength. Am J Med 2006;119(526):9–17.
7. Conclusion [16] Tsujinaka T, Fujita J, Ebisui C, et al. Interleukin 6 receptor antibody inhibits
muscle atrophy and modulates proteolytic systems in interleukin 6 transgenic
mice. J Clin Invest 1996;97:244–9.
The introduction of biotherapies that target the inflammatory [17] Mangner N, Linke A, Oberbach A, et al. Exercise training prevents TNF-␣ induced
processes underlying chronic inflammatory joint disease has con- loss of force in the diaphragm of mice. PloS One 2013;8:e52274.
[18] Tournadre A, Pereira B, Dutheil F, et al. Changes in body composition and
stituted a therapeutic breakthrough. Nevertheless, both RA and SpA metabolic profile during IL-6 inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis. J Cachexia
remain associated with a decline in physical capabilities and with Sarcopenia Muscle 2017;8:639–46.
numerous comorbidities responsible for both quality of life impair- [19] Mikkelsen UR, Dideriksen K, Andersen MB, et al. Preserved skeletal muscle
protein anabolic response to acute exercise and protein intake in well-treated
ments and excess mortality. Body composition changes in these rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:271.
diseases, notably sarcopenic obesity, may contribute both to the [20] Zhang J, Fu L, Shi J, et al. The risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with
functional disability and to the increased risk of comorbidities. Pre- rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS One
2013;8:e78151.
serving or improving muscle mass and function is therefore a key
[21] Yamada T, Abe M, Lee J, et al. Muscle dysfunction associated with adjuvant-
goal to maintain function and improve quality of life in patients induced arthritis is prevented by antioxidant treatment. Skelet Muscle
with chronic inflammatory joint disease. Achieving this goal will 2015;5:20.
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001
G Model
BONSOI-4764; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
6 A. Tournadre et al. / Joint Bone Spine xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
[22] Vial G, Pinel A, Coudy-Gandilhon C, et al. Étude de la lipotoxicité muscu- [44] Y-H.H Lien. Looking for Sarcopenia Biomarkers. Am J Med 2017;130:502–3.
laire dans un modèle d’arthrite induite au collagène. Rev Rhum 2017;84S:A46 [45] Deutz NEP, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal
(PC.07). muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN expert group.
[23] Camporez J-PG, Petersen MC, Abudukadier A, et al. Anti-myostatin antibody Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl 2014;33:929–36.
increases muscle mass and strength and improves insulin sensitivity in old [46] Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, et al. Prevalence of and interventions
mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016:201525795. for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review Report of the International
[24] Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Orav JE, Kanis JA, et al. Comparative performance Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing 2014;43:748–59.
of current definitions of sarcopenia against the prospective incidence of [47] Gryson C, Ratel S, Rance M, et al. Four-month course of soluble milk proteins
falls among community-dwelling seniors age 65 and older. Osteoporos Int interacts with exercise to improve muscle strength and delay fatigue in elderly
2015;26:2793–802. participants. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:958 [e1–9].
[25] Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: european consensus on [48] Chanet A, Salles J, Guillet C, et al. Vitamin D supplementation restores the
definition and diagnosis report of the european working group on sarcopenia blunted muscle protein synthesis response in deficient old rats through an
in older people. Age Ageing 2010;39:412–23. impact on ectopic fat deposition. J Nutr Biochem 2017;46:30–8.
[26] Cheung C-L, Lam KSL, Cheung BMY. Evaluation of cutpoints for low lean mass [49] Chanet A, Verlaan S, Salles J, et al. Supplementing breakfast with a vitamin
and slow gait speed in predicting death in the national health and nutrition D and leucine-enriched whey protein medical nutrition drink enhances post-
examination survey 1999–2004. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016;71:90–5. prandial muscle protein synthesis and muscle mass in healthy older men. J Nutr
[27] Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 2017;252510.
2011;305:50–8. [50] Capel F, Cheraiti N, Acquaviva C, et al. Oleate dose-dependently regulates palmi-
[28] Baumgartner RN, Wayne SJ, Waters DL, et al. Sarcopenic obesity predicts tate metabolism and insulin signaling in C2C12 myotubes. Biochim Biophys
instrumental activities of daily living disability in the elderly. Obes Res Acta 2016;1861:2000–10.
2004;12:1995–2004. [51] Gray SR, Mittendorfer B. Fish oil-derived n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for
[29] Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, et al. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a system- the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
atic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 2017;12:e0169548. 2018;21:104–9.
[30] Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, et al. Financial impact of sarcopenia on hospi- [52] Khoja SS, Almeida GJ, Chester Wasko M, et al. Association of light-intensity
talization costs. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016;70:1046–51. physical activity with lower cardiovascular disease risk burden in rheumatoid
[31] Giles JT, Ling SM, Ferrucci L, et al. Abnormal body composition phenotypes in arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:424–31.
older rheumatoid arthritis patients: Association with disease characteristics [53] Matthews CE, Moore SC, Sampson J, et al. Mortality benefits for replacing sitting
and pharmacotherapies. Arthritis Care Res 2008;59:807–15. time with different physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:1833–40.
[32] Kramer HR, Fontaine KR, Bathon JM, et al. Muscle density in rheumatoid [54] Lemmey AB, Marcora SM, Chester K, et al. Effects of high-intensity resistance
arthritis: Associations with disease features and functional outcomes. Arthritis training in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
Rheum 2012;64:2438–50. Arthritis Care Res 2009;61:1726–34.
[33] Baker JF, Von Feldt J, Mostoufi-Moab S, et al. Deficits in muscle mass, muscle [55] Marcora SM, Chester KR, Mittal G, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of anti-tumor
density, and modified associations with fat in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis necrosis factor therapy for cachexia in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Care Res 2014;66:1612–8. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:1463–72.
[34] Giles JT, Bartlett SJ, Andersen RE, et al. Association of body composition with [56] Engvall I-L, Tengstrand B, Brismar K, et al. Infliximab therapy increases body fat
disability in rheumatoid arthritis: Impact of appendicular fat and lean tissue mass in early rheumatoid arthritis independently of changes in disease activ-
mass. Arthritis Care Res 2008;59:1407–15. ity and levels of leptin and adiponectin: a randomised study over 21 months.
[35] Lusa AL, Amigues I, Kramer HR, et al. Indicators of walking speed in rheumatoid Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R197.
arthritis: relative influence of articular, psychosocial, and body composition [57] Marouen S, Barnetche T, Combe B, et al. TNF inhibitors increase fat mass in
characteristics. Arthritis Care Res 2015;67:21–31. inflammatory rheumatic disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin
[36] Baker JF, Billig E, Michaud K, et al. Weight loss, the obesity paradox, and the Exp Rheumatol 2017;35:337–43.
risk of death in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:1711–7. [58] Ando K, Takahashi F, Motojima S, et al. Possible role for tocilizumab, an anti-
[37] Giraud C, Dutheil F, Lambert C, et al. Répartition du syndrome métabolique interleukin-6 receptor antibody, in treating cancer cachexia. J Clin Oncol Off J
en fonction du poids dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde et les spondyloarthrites. Am Soc Clin Oncol 2013;31:69–72.
Congres Fr Ed Rhumatol 2017;PC.24. [59] Hmamouchi I, Roux C, Paternotte S, et al. Early increase of abdominal adipos-
[38] Hars M, Biver E, Chevalley T, et al. Low lean mass predicts incident fractures ity in patients with spondyloarthritis receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-␣
independently from FRAX: a prospective cohort study of recent retirees. J Bone treatment. J Rheumatol 2014;41:1112–7.
Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 2016;31:2048–56. [60] Basaria S, Coviello AD, Travison TG, et al. Adverse events associated with testos-
[39] Harris R, Chang Y, Beavers K, et al. Risk of fracture in women with terone administration. N Engl J Med 2010;363:109–22.
sarcopenia, low bone mass, or both. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:2673–8, [61] Dalton JT, Barnette KG, Bohl CE, et al. The selective androgen receptor mod-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15050 [Epub 2017 Sep 27]. ulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function
[40] El Maghraoui A, Sadni S, Rezqi A, et al. Does rheumatoid cachexia predispose in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: results of a double-blind,
patients with rheumatoid arthritis to osteoporosis and vertebral fractures? J placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011;2:153–61.
Rheumatol 2015;42:1556–62. [62] Dobs AS, Boccia RV, Croot CC, et al. Effects of enobosarm on muscle wast-
[41] Miller MD, Crotty M, Giles LC, et al. Corrected arm muscle area: an independent ing and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised
predictor of long-term mortality in community-dwelling older adults? J Am controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:335–45.
Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1272–7. [63] Liu H, Bravata DM, Olkin I, et al. Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of
[42] Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, et al. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, growth hormone in the healthy elderly. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:104–15.
study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol [64] Chilibeck P, Kaviani M, Candow D, et al. Effect of creatine supplementation
A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:547–58. during resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscular strength in older
[43] Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: adults: a meta-analysis. Open Access J Sports Med 2017;8:213–26.
skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body [65] Becker C, Lord SR, Studenski SA, et al. Myostatin antibody (LY2495655) in older
mass index. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2013;31:1539–47. weak fallers: a proof-of-concept, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes
Endocrinol 2015;3:948–57.
Please cite this article in press as: Tournadre A, et al. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.001