Public Policy and Progam Administration
Public Policy and Progam Administration
Public Policy and Progam Administration
Each organization should design specific policies that address specific needs. Lack
of good policies can cause operational, legal and ethical problems within an
organization. For example, the absence of a good staff recruitment policy that
addresses equal opportunity employment could lead to legal issues with the
regulatory authorities for a firm.
Academic discipline
Main article: Public policy school
As an academic discipline, public policy brings in elements of many social science fields
and concepts, including economics, sociology, political economy, program
evaluation, policy analysis, and public management, all as applied to problems of
governmental administration, management, and operations.At the same time, the study
of public policy is distinct from political science or economics, in its focus on the
application of theory to practice. While the majority of public policy
degrees are master's and doctoral degrees, there are several universities also offer
undergraduate education in public policy.
Traditionally, the academic field of public policy focused on domestic policy. However,
the wave of economic globalization which occurred in the late 20th and early 21st
centuries created a need for a subset of public policy that focuses on global governance,
especially as it relates to issues that transcend national borders such as climate
change, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and economic development. Consequently,
many traditional public policy schools had to tweak their curricula to adjust to this new
policy landscape, as well as developed whole new ones.
2. POLICY MAKERS
Who are the policy makers?
Organisational policy makers i.e. Board of Directors, Management Committee,
Executives, must go about the process of policy formation in a careful way. Policy
makers must engage, and be seen to engage, in the process of consultation. A charge of
'failing to consult' is a charge of considerable magnitude. Whilst much information can
be gleaned by listening to people, there is also often a need to conduct research i.e.
statistical surveys, monitor events, etc.
The role of the policy maker is act as a funnel to gather information through consultation
and research and to reduce and extract from the information, a policy or a set of policies
which serve to promote what is the preferred course of action.
Some of the skills that policy makers need to ensure the development of effective
policies are:
Collecting statistical information
Convening and chairing discussion forums
Be able to write policy documents in appropriate language and without ambiguity.
Seeking information from experts from outside the organisation (this may include
government personnel, other sport and recreation managers and academics in sport and
recreation management)
Your success in policy development will depend to some extent on your ability to
research examples of policy and to discuss policy issues with numerous other people.
Good policies stem from wide consultation and in depth discussion.
3. POLICY FORMATION
Notice that there are two parts to this definition of policy formulation:
The tidy division of labor incorporates two distinct roles professional policy analysts,
working both inside and outside government, use their formidable kit of analytical tools
to study an issue and to devise policy alternatives which appear to address the issue at
hand. This presumably brings theory and knowledge into policy formulation.
Both roles should complement each other. The policy planners are expected to
contribute sound technical analysis regarding means, behavior, cost, implementation
strategy, and consequences, good or bad. Technical analysts, however, are not held
accountable to the public. The elected or politically appointed officials do not necessarily
have the analytical ability to address the problem. The judgment as to goals, trade-offs,
value priorities, and weighing the overall effects are left to the decision makers who are,
in theory, accountable under our representative form of government.
The arrangement works to the extent that the analysts are keen and informed and that
the decision makers exercise sound judgment and are responsive. If the policy goes
awry, we might ask if the technical analysis was faulty or if the political actors either
exercised bad judgment, excluded effective alternatives, mis-defined the problem, or
"played politics" with public policy. Either way, we assume the politicians are ultimately
charged with policy making and that they will properly be held accountable by the
public.
Public policy refers to the actions taken by government — its decisions that are intended
to solve problems and improve the quality of life for its citizens. At the federal level,
public policies are enacted to regulate industry and business, to protect citizens at home
and abroad, to aid state and city governments and people such as the poor through
funding programs, and to encourage social goals.
A policy established and carried out by the government goes through several stages
from inception to conclusion. These are agenda building, formulation, adoption,
implementation, evaluation, and termination.
Agenda building
Before a policy can be created, a problem must exist that is called to the attention of the
government. Illegal immigration, for example, has been going on for many years, but it
was not until the 1990s that enough people considered it such a serious problem that it
required increased government action. Another example is crime. American society
tolerates a certain level of crime; however, when crime rises dramatically or is perceived
to be rising dramatically, it becomes an issue for policymakers to address. Specific
events can place a problem on the agenda. The flooding of a town near a river raises the
question of whether homes should be allowed to be built in a floodplain. New legislation
on combating terrorism (the USA Patriot Act, for example) was a response to the attacks
of September 11, 2001.
Implementation
Evaluation means determining how well a policy is working, and it is not an easy task.
People inside and outside of government typically use cost-benefit analysis to try to
find the answer. In other words, if the government is spending x billions of dollars on
this policy, are the benefits derived from it worth the expenditure? Cost-benefit analysis
is based on hard-to-come-by data that are subject to different, and sometimes
contradictory, interpretations.
History has shown that once implemented, policies are difficult to terminate. When they
are terminated, it is usually because the policy became obsolete, clearly did not work, or
lost its support among the interest groups and elected officials that placed it on the
agenda in the first place. In 1974, for example, Congress enacted a national speed limit
of 55 miles per hour. It was effective in reducing highway fatalities and gasoline
consumption. On the other hand, the law increased costs for the trucking industry and
was widely viewed as an unwarranted federal intrusion into an area that belonged to the
states to regulate. The law was repealed in 1987.