NVP AND IRR Task

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Ricardo Palma University

Faculty: Economic and Business Science

School: Global Business Administration

Professor: Carlos, González Taranco

Curso: Corporate Finance

Group: 1

NVP AND IRR EXERCISES

Author

Kelly Milagros Orozco Rosales

June 17, 2020 – Lima, Perú

2020-I
NPV AND IRR EXERCISES

Suppose that you are in the real estate business. You are considering construction of an office
block. The land would cost $50,000, and construction would cost a further $300,000. You
foresee a shortage of office space and predict that a year from now you will be able to sell the
building for $400,000. Thus you would be investing $350,000 now in the expectation of
realizing $400,000 at the end of the year.

A) If the opportunity cost of capital were 8%, is the real state project a good
business?

r= interest rate = 0.08

X * (1+ r) = 400000

X*(1+0.08) = 400000

X = 400000/1.08

X = 370370.370

Here, we have to invest 370370.370 in order to get 400000 at the end of 1 year.

In this case it is a good business because you get more in one year than the money that
you invest, so you get utilities.

B) What is the office development’s NPV if construction costs increase to


$355,000? Assume the opportunity cost of capital is 12%. Is the development still
a worthwhile investment? How high can development costs be before the project
is no longer attractive? Now suppose that the opportunity cost of capital is 20%
with construction costs of $355,000. Why is the office development no longer an
attractive investment?

Even if construction costs are $355,000, NPV is still positive:

NPV = PV – $355,000

NPV = $357,143 – $355,000

NPV = $2,143

Comment:

Therefore, the project is still worth pursuing. The project is viable as long as
construction costs are less than the PV of the future cash flow, that is, as long as
construction costs are less than $357,143.
However, if the opportunity cost of capital is 20 percent, the PV of the $400,000 sales
price is lower and NPV is negative:

PV = $400,000 × 1/1.2

PV = $333,333

NPV = PV – $355,000

NPV= –$21,667.

The present value of the future cash flow is not as high when the opportunity cost of
capital is higher. The project would need to provide a higher payoff in order to be
viable in the face of the higher opportunity cost of capital.

C) If you expect to receive a rent of $ 16,000 during three years and you expect to
sell the building at $ 475,000 at the third year, calculate IRR.

Using the formula:

The details of cost incurred and cash inflows year wise as follows :

Year 0 : $ 350,000 as cost ( $300,000 construction + $50,000 land cost)

Year 1 : Cash inflow $ 16,000 ( annual rent )

Year 2 : Cash inflow $ 16,000 ( annual rent)


Year 3 : Cash inflow $475,000( sell of building)

Discounting rate, It has been taken as annual interest rate of 8%

Accordingly Net Present Value - NPV, $

0= - 350,000 + 16,000/( 1 + IRR) + 16,000 / ( 1 +I RR)^2 + + 491,000/(1+ IRR)^3

IRR =14.87%

THE IRR IS 14.87%

You might also like