Universities - Engines of Inequality
Universities - Engines of Inequality
Universities - Engines of Inequality
Engine of Inequality
By Karin Fischer JANUARY 17, 2016
S eventy years ago, with the passage of the GI Bill, Congress opened the doors
Colleges are seen broadly as engines of opportunity, as economic equalizers. Is that reputation deserved?
This is part of an occasional series exploring that question.
The wage premium for college graduates — the earnings disparity between workers
with bachelor’s degrees and those with only high-school diplomas — is great and
getting greater. But so, too, is the socioeconomic split between the two groups. Even
though the number of financially needy students graduating from high school and
attending college has increased in recent decades, the share of bachelor’s degrees
awarded to students from the lowest income quartile declined, from 12 percent in
1970 to 10 percent in 2014. Less than a quarter of students from families with annual
incomes of less than $10,000 earned bachelor’s degrees within six years, compared
with nearly two-thirds of those with incomes of more than $150,000.
So for the individual, yes, higher education offers economic opportunity. But if higher
education is a ticket — and increasingly the ticket — to economic security in this
country, there are real imbalances in whose tickets get punched.
Here’s how Thomas G. Mortenson, an analyst who crunched the data, puts it. "The
rich are getting richer because of higher education," says Mr. Mortenson, a senior
scholar at the Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education, "and the
poor are getting poorer because of it."
Many factors that have little to do with higher education, of course, influence whether
students go to college, where they enroll, and whether they succeed: maternal health
care, school quality, the neighborhood they grew up in.
But higher education "takes the inequality given to it and magnifies it," says Anthony
P. Carnevale, director of the Center on Education and the Workforce at Georgetown
University. "It’s an inequality machine."
Finding a solution is pressing, says Kati Haycock, president of the Education Trust.
Half of current public-school students — those who could go on to college or get left
behind — qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. (Subsidized lunches are available to
children from families that earn up to $44,863 annually, for a family of four.) The
risks of doing nothing, she says, "are too awful to contemplate."
In the coming months, The Chronicle will examine how college itself plays a role in
reinforcing and even widening the gap between haves and have-nots. We will look at
the ways that happens, and why.
How do the messages that rich kids and poor kids get about earning a degree differ?
Why do the poorest and least-prepared students end up disproportionately at
institutions ill-equipped to help them succeed? What are the policy choices and the
day-to-day decisions that state legislators and federal regulators, college presidents,
chancellors, and boards of trustees make that perpetuate economic and educational
divides? How have we ended up with a system that perpetuates disadvantage? Can it
be fixed?
Karin Fischer writes about international education, colleges and the economy, and
other issues. She’s on Twitter @karinfischer, and her email address
is karin.fischer@chronicle.com.