8 - Growth Prediction
8 - Growth Prediction
8 - Growth Prediction
Orthodontics
Dr. Ramy Ishaq
BDS, MSc, PhD Orthodontics Cairo University
Morth RCSED UK
Chapter Outline
• Introduction
• Need for Growth Prediction
• Methods of Prediction
• Hunterian concept
• Gnomonic growth
• Arcial growth by Ricketts
• Moorrees mesh
• Johnson’s template
• Todd’s equation
• Visualized treatment objective (Holdaway)
• Visualized treatment objective (Ricketts)
• Morphometrics methods
Introduction
• Every child extensively differs in the rate, amount and direction of
growth and in the expression of the extent of his malocclusion
• Every child has a unique pattern of development.
• To achieve a successful orthodontic or surgical result, the
orthodontist must have some understanding of the patient’s future
facial growth potential.
• For this reason, there has been a long-standing interest in maxillary
and mandibular growth prediction.
• In 1938, Brodie at al. found that there was a definite correlation
between success in treatment and good facial growth
Before and after treatment
• Before beginning treatment, it would be advantageous if the
orthodontist could reliably estimate how future changes in the
vertical or the horizontal relationships of the jaws are related to the
incremental skeletal increases and the timing of growth. It is also
important to evaluate whether posttreatment growth will affect
factors related to retention care.
• Many authors agree that it is
important to be able to accurately
growth can predict the direction, timing,
work magnitude of the facial changes that
occur with growth in an individual
with (Bishara, 2000; Ricketts, 1957;
or Turchetta et al., 2007), therefore
reducing the difficulty in treatment
against planning, especially since growth can
work with or against the orthodontist.
the
orthodontist.
• Dentofacial orthopedics is concerned with attempts to alter the size
or direction or location of growth of some components of the
craniofacial complex.
• Growth prediction helps in predicting to a certain extent the response
to treatment and the growth changes.
Definition of Growth prediction
• Growth prediction can be defined as the forecast of growth related
changes with the objective of predicting the direction and amount of
the growth of the maxilla and particularly the mandible as well as the
timing of the adolescent growth period.
Need for Growth Prediction
• Growth prediction helps the clinician to intercept and correct the
malocclusion.
• Growth prediction can be used as patient education aids.
• Growth prediction (VTO) is helpful in 'visualizing' the treatment
objectives and prioritizes the objectives, keeping in mind the growth
pattern of the patient.
Need for Growth Prediction
• Growth prediction is a tool for orthodontic treatment planning but
without forcing any particular treatment procedure.
• Response to a particular treatment can be predicted, provided the
patient continues in the same growth direction.
• If the patient continues to be in the growth phase even after
treatment, growth following the conclusion of treatment can be
predicted to plan for retention period, thus ensuring stability of the
results.
Methods of Prediction
Template method
Other cephalometric
methods like VTOs
Template method
MU point (Murray)
Tr/True radius
DC-Xi line
Xi-PM line
Curve A
• Curve A was through DC-Xi and
PM .
• If mandibular growth had been
along this curve, then it would
open the gonial angle too wide,
which normally does not
happen.
• The resulting mandible will be
too obtuse this way.
Curve B
• This curve was constructed
passing from the tip of coronoid
process through the anterior
border of ramus, and through
Pm
• The mandibular growth along
this curve would be bent too
much.
Curve C Arc of Mandible:
• The final curve was between
coronoid and condylar processes
through Eva-PM.
• When annual increments of
mandibular growth [about 2.5
mm] added and mandibular
growth predicted along this
curve, it was found to correlate
very well with the final
composite of the computer
analysis
Moorrees Mesh
• Moorrees constructed a template in the form of a mesh which was
used to superimpose growth changes in serial LCR
Construction
• 24 equal sized rectangles
• core rectangle, the size of which
varies for every patient and this
determines the size of all the
other rectangles.
extracranial vertical lines
Johnston’s
Grid Johnston's grid though appearing very complex,
is actually extremely simple when used.
Johnston's template uses normative standard
[by including children with malocclusion] rather
than ideal standards which can be difficult for
comparison while using for children with altered
growth.
Forecast grid
developed by
Johnston
The tracing of the
landmarks is
superimposed along S-
N and registered at S.
The points are then
advanced downwards
1 unit per year
Todd’s Equation
• The disadvantages of ordinary prediction methods are:
• They are all in the form one of linear coordinate system, either
rectangle or grid system, it cannot predict radial growth, the angular
coordinate of each landmark remains a constant.
• There are many frames of reference used to describe growth. Every
frame of reference can give a description of growth changes, for
example, SN superimposition is markedly different from FH plane
superimposition.
Todd’s Equation
• Todd considered that biomechanical influences on growth and the
foremost influence is that of the force of gravity.
Visualized Treatment Objective (VTO)
• Visualized Treatment Objective was coined by Holdaway.
• According to Proffit, A VTO is a cephalometric tracing representing
the changes that are expected during treatment ().
• Ricketts defines VTO as a visual plan to forecast the normal growth of
the patient and anticipated influences of treatment