Going Viral: An Analysis of Youtube Videos: Iris Mohr St. John'S University, TCB
Going Viral: An Analysis of Youtube Videos: Iris Mohr St. John'S University, TCB
Going Viral: An Analysis of Youtube Videos: Iris Mohr St. John'S University, TCB
Iris Mohr
St. John’s University, TCB
In this new era of marketing, ideas go viral, and spread like an infectious disease. Seeding strategies have
strong influences on the success of viral marketing campaigns. In this paper, both case and content
analysis were employed to examine the impact of influencers on viral campaigns. In doing so, this study
extends on the two step/multistep models of communication. The empirical results show that seeding to
well-connected people, celebrities, media vehicles, or anyone with a huge following through their greater
reach is the most successful approach because these attractive seeding players are more likely to
participate in viral marketing campaigns.
INTRODUCTION
A hot topic today is viral marketing, which describes the phenomenon by which consumers mutually
share and spread marketing-relevant information in the form of emails, YouTube videos, and social
media postings. The information is initially sent out deliberately by marketers to stimulate and capitalize
on word-of-mouth (WOM) behaviors (Van der Lans et al. 2010) and encourage users to pass it on to other
users, creating a potentially exponential growth in the message's visibility and effect. These
characteristics parallel the traits of infectious diseases (Watts and Peretti 2007).
To date, there is no marketing academic literature that incorporates the new social media influencer
and viral phenomenon into the communication model. The two-step flow model was first introduced in
1944 by Paul Lazarsfeld et al. in 1944, and hypothesizes that ideas flow from mass media to opinion
leaders and from them to the wider population. It was later elaborated by Elihu Katz and Lazarsfeld in
1955 (Katz and Lazarsfeld 1955). The extended Multistep Flow Model says that most people form their
opinions based on opinion leaders that influence the media. Opinion leaders are those initially exposed to
a specific media content, and those that interpret it are based on their own opinion. They then begin to
infiltrate these opinions through the general public who become "opinion followers.”
The current model assumes that "opinion leaders" gain their influence through more elite media as
opposed to mainstream mass media, social media influencers, and user generated content. However, with
the advent of social media, there is a new type of opinion leader. User generated content producers,
bloggers and other amateur journalists are creating news content, and people who have been made
subjects of news articles are responding online, posting supplementary information to provide comments,
context, and counterpoints. Increasingly, the public is turning to online sources for information and
consumption matters, such as bloggers, user reviews, and tweeters, reflecting the growing trust in
alternative media; and, to user generated content produced by the mass media for entertainment purposes.
Though social media is transforming the way organizations, consumers, and people in general
communicate and entertain, the academic literature reflects remarkably little effort to understand where
METHODOLOGY
A two-part study was undertaken to understand how ideas go viral. Part 1 is a case study of Susan
Boyle that attempts to validate the four critical factors of viral campaigns (Hintz et al. 2011). Susan
Boyle, a contestant on Britain’s Got Talent, transformed into a global sensation, attracting millions of
YouTube viewers. Part 2 is a content analysis exploratory study that examines top viral YouTube videos
for the purpose of identifying key elements of successful viral campaigns, differences in variations in
levels of success, the relationship between source and popularity of video, and the role/impact of the
influencer in communication models.
CONCLUSIONS
This study presents support for the importance of seeding points in influencing the success of viral
campaigns. In this article, a two-part study examined the impact of influencers on campaigns that go
viral. The empirical results show that seeding to well-connected people, celebrities, media vehicles, or
anyone with a huge following through their greater reach is the most successful approach because of
these attractive players are more likely to participate in viral marketing campaigns.
Communication models that incorporate the new type of ‘opinion leader’ and viral phenomenon
would be a fruitful avenue for future research. Another extension is to provide a foundation for future
research by clarifying the new ‘opinion leader’ construct, developing research propositions, and
constructing an integrating framework that includes antecedents and consequences of communication,
where some forms of communication are associated with the success of viral marketing campaigns. In
addition, from a marketing perspective, it would be useful to target seeding points that expedite the
diffusion of viral marketing campaigns.
TABLE 1
SUSAN BOYLE TIMELINE
11th April – Susan Boyle appears on Britain’s Got Talent and performs ‘I Dreamed a
Dream’ from Les Miserables. The judges are blown away and the show attracts 10.3 million
viewers.
11th April – Susan Boyle’s performance is uploaded (unofficially) to YouTube
11th April – Susan Boyle’s YouTube performance Dugg by Jenocide312
REFERENCES
Arndt, Johan (1967), “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,”
Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (August), 291–95.
Bampo, Mauro, Michael T. Ewing, Dineli R. Mather, David Stewart, and Mark Wallace (2008), “The
Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance,”
Information Systems Research, 19 (3), 273–90.
Berger, Jonah and Katy Milkman (2011), “Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online
Content,” (accessed July 21, 2011), [available at
http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/documents/research/Virality.pdf].
Berger, Johna and Eric Schwartz (2011), “What Do People Talk About? Drivers of Immediate and
Ongoing Word-of-Mouth,” Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming.
Bretts, Bruce; Roush, Matt; (25 March 2013). "Baddies to the Bone: The 60 nastiest villains of all time".
TV Guide, 14 - 15.
Gladwell, Malcolm (2002), The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston:
Back Bay Books.
Grossman, Lev (24 April 2006). "How to get famous in 3500 seconds". Time Magazine.
Henneberry, Russ (2012). “How to Find Influential People with Social Media,” Social Media Examiner,
(October 17), http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/industry-influencers
Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An
Empirical Comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55-71.
Kalish, Shlomo, Vijay Mahajan, and Eitan Muller (1995), “Waterfall and Sprinkler New-Product
Strategies in Competitive Global Markets,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12
(2), 105–119.
Kaufman, Gil (April 17, 2009). "Ashton Kutcher Beats CNN In Twitter-Off". MTV. Retrieved September
5, 2010.
Katz & Lazarsfeld (1955). "Personal Influence". New York: Free Press.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his
mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Libai, Barak, Eitan Muller, and Renana Peres (2005), “The Role of Seeding in Multi-Market Entry,”
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 (4), 375–93.