Understanding The Purpose and Study of Psychology
Understanding The Purpose and Study of Psychology
Understanding The Purpose and Study of Psychology
Psychology is defined as the scientific study of human mind and behaviour. The study of
psychology describe us about how human mind think, feel, and respond. It also tells us about the
human experiences by focusing on mind through consciousness, reasoning, and memory and
through language to mental health and personality. Therefore, anything an individual do is
relevant to this subject. Psychology allows person to understand about how mind and body
correlates and work altogether. This information can enhance the way of living by dealing with
emotional or work stress and help in decision-making. It also give assistance to manage time and
in setting and achieving goals. The study impact human health in positive sense by treating
mental illness of patients. It can diagnose problems and supported in medicine development
(Owlcation).
The study of psychology, enable psychologists to deal with the real life problems. The discipline
of psychology contains the analysis of human behaviour and its approaches towards social,
cognitive and biological systems. However, also include implementation of this understanding to
relevant situations. Profession of psychology not only requires elementary education but also
need to expand and polish analytical thinking skills. Psychologists may vary in their types.
Psychologists can be classified as organizational, clinical, and educational psychologists etc.
1) Psychodynamic Approach
2) Cognitive Approach
3) Biological Approach
4) Behavioral Approach
5) Humanistic Approach
2) Biological Approach:
In view of biological approach all human feelings, thoughts, and behaviour occurs due to a
biological event. This major perspective includes the study of hormones, brain, immune system,
genetics brain and nervous system. The biological perspective support the reason that allover
behaviour of a person is adopted by his/her parents and it is known as evolutionary function.
Psychologists of this perspective reveal behaviour in neurological terms such as structure and
physiology of brain and how it controls behaviour. Biological psychologists worked on abnormal
behaviour and explained the reasons behind it. Such findings helped psychiatrists in the
identification of mental illness and in developing the relevant drugs. While some psychologists
argued that, this would only treat symptoms not the basic cause. Therefore, biological
psychologists plays an important role in making a clear picture of factors that are involved in the
way of behaving for health psychologists to further work on it (McLeod, S.A., 2013).
3) Humanistic Approach:
Humanistic approach also known as holism because it considers the whole individual for study.
Psychologists of humanistic approach not only consider the human behaviour through
observations but also consider the personal opinion of individual under observation. They
believe that a person’s behaviour is the real image of his/her own thoughts and feelings. The
humanistic approach believes that the every human being is distinct and independent from each
other. This approach is of a viewpoint that all individuals are liable to their success and
happiness. According to this perspective, humans have the ability of self-realization, which
enable us to gain highest possibilities of life. Because humanistic approach regards an individual
and his experiences for studying behaviour, marked as an inappropriate method of scientific
research (McLeod, S.A., 2013).
Research design
If there any benefits or risks associated to the participant, he/she must be informed. Risk
does not only refer to physical harm but also to psychological harm.
Additional contact number should be given to participant so they can contact with the
researcher in case of an emergency or to solve any query.
Confidentiality of participants and right to withdraw from the study at any time without any
consequences (BPS, 2010).
2) Cross-examine: Participants should be informed fully that at the end of research, he/she
could discuss about the findings and procedure of the study with the concerned
psychologists. Debriefing should be given as soon as possible and psychologists should
ensure that it is understood by participants. Main purpose of debriefing is to eliminate any
misunderstanding or concerns of participants about the research and to left them with the
sense of knowledge, dignity and perception that time is not wasted (Harris, 1998).
3) Participants Protection: Investigators make sure that the participants would not get any
type of discomfort. They should be given physical and mental protection. It means that the
participant must not be frightened, offended or embarrass. It is advised to researchers that
the ratio of risk or harm must not be greater than the risks; an individual has gone through
his/her life. If children, an elderly, and disabled person, who relates to vulnerable group is
involved in the study, special care should be given to them. For eg: If students are
participants so they should be given brief explanation about the research topic, as they easily
get tired of reading and understanding the main theme of the topic. In some cases, researcher
fails to give accurate information about the possible risks, so for this reason therapeutic
debriefing should be given to participants that have been disturbed by the research
methodology. For eg: Zimbardo’s prisoners study.
4) Deception: When participants are misguided about the aims and objectives of research.
There are two types of deception, which are as follows:
i) Intentional misleading. For eg: Using assistants to take part in research as a participant to
achieve desired outcome (staged manipulation).
ii) Betrayal by omission. For eg: Fail to disclose information about the study or creating
uncertainty.
The researcher should avoid misleading the participants about the research work unless an
expert of the field would review it. In some cases, there is no chance to eliminate the factor
of deception. Only in those types of cases deception can be approved but with the consent of
expert and in low proportion. For eg: In case of Milgram’s study of obedience. In that case,
Participants were fooled about that the learners were given electric shocks. However, in
reality, all the learners were accomplice of the researcher Milgram. Therefore, to avoid any
distress to participants, researcher should consult with the group of experts that how much
proportion of deception is suitable for the research and participants. During debriefing if the
participants are discomforted, the study would be unacceptable. This means that the
participant’s consent was taken through deception and he/she don’t know about the actual
research work. In order to avoid this situation, data of the research should be revealed at the
beginning of the study. Some psychologists claimed that the deception could not be justified
ever because:
i) Ignorance of code of conduct of approval of participants.
ii) Misguide and create suspect about the profession of psychology.
6) Elimination from Research: Participants have the right to terminate research at any point
of disappointment or when they get distressed. Researcher should tell the participants that
they have the liberty to withdraw from the study. The participants must not be pressurized
by the investigator to complete the research work if they are unwilling to do so. For eg:
Milgram’s research. In most of the cases, participants have paid and worried about the
payment if they discontinue. Therefore, they should given an opportunity to quit even at the
last moment (McLeod, S.A., 2015).
References:
About psychology, 2019, The University of Queenland Australia, School of Psychology.
Available at [https://psychology.uq.edu.au/about/about-psychology]
Harris, B. (1988). Key words: A history of debriefing in social psychology. In J. Morawski
(Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 188-212). New York: Oxford
University Press.
McLeod, S.A. (2013). Psychology perspectives, Simply psychology. Available at:
[https://www.simplypsychology.org/perspective.html]
McLeod, S. A. (2015, January 14). Psychology research ethics. Simply Psychology.
Available at:[ https://www.simplypsychology.org/Ethics.html]
Owlcation. Available at:
[https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Psychology-and-its-Importance].
The British Psychological Society. (2010). Code of Human Research Ethics. Available at:
[www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/code_of_human_research_ethics.pdf]