CONSTI 1 Case Complie V2.00
CONSTI 1 Case Complie V2.00
CONSTI 1 Case Complie V2.00
ART. 1 AND 2
The Supremacy of the Constitution
Preamble - Purpose and Effect
Philippine Baseline Law
Suability vs Liability
Suability vs Execution
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Republicanism
Ours is a Government of Laws and Not of Men
Doctrine of Checks and Balances
The Supremacy of the Constitution
THEN determines whether the act in question had been performed in accordance with the rules laid down by the constitut
JUSTICIABLE
20 Private Sector
21 Agrarian Reform
22 Indigenous Cultural Communities
23 Non-Governmental Organizations
24 Communications
25 Local Autonomy
26 Equal Access to Public Service; Political Dynasties
28 Full Public Disclosure
CITIZENSHIP
Before the 1935 Constitution
Philippine Bill of 1902 (En Masse
Act 2927 - Naturalization Law of March 26, 1920
Roa Doctrine (re: res judicata)
Policy against Dual Allegiance
Naturalization
Direct
Judicial naturalization under C.A. 473,
Administrative naturalization under R.A. 9139
Special Act of Legislature
Derivative
1. wife of naturalized husband
2. minor children of naturalized person
3. alien woman upon marriage to a national
Loss of Citizenship
Reacquisition of Citizenship
Under R.A. 2630
Under R.A. 8171
Under R.A. 9225
SUFFRAGE
Suffrage as right and duty
Residence qualification
AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS
Amendment vs. Revision
Impeachment
Procedure for impeachment
"CANDLE DOCTRINE"
The Sandiganbayan
The Ombudsman
Ill-gotten Wealth
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth
unity from Suit
GOVERNMENTAL function
PROPRIETARY function
XPN: NECESSARY INCIDENT to its GOVERNMENTAL function
rs into contract
d by a particular department?
determines whether the power has been constitutionally conferred upon the department. Conferment of
er EXPREES, IMPLIED, INHERENT OR INCIDENTAL
mines whether the act in question had been performed in accordance with the rules laid down by the constitution
JUSTICIABLE VS. POLITICAL QUESTIONS
NOT TRULY POLITICAL QUESTION
NOT TRULY POLITICAL QUESTION
POLITICAL
POLITICAL
ELEGATION OF POWERS
Potestas Delegata Non Potest Delegare)
-delegation of powers
OF QUALIFIED POLITICAL AGENCY
ic Social Order
ural Communities
tal Organizations
Constitution
En Masse Filipinization)
aturalization Law of March 26, 1920
(re: res judicata)
ual Allegiance
Citizenship
PUBLIC OFFICERS
Public office is a public trust
Republic v. Villasor The State cannot be sued without its consent. A sovereign is
Syquia v. Almeda A foreign government cannot be sued in the courts of another
Minucher v. CA A foreign agent, operating within a territory, can be cloaked with
Arigo v. Swift The doctrine of state immunity is also applicable to complaints
Lasco v. UNRFNRE The court ruled that immunity is necessary to assure unimpeded
Callado v. IRRI Where the plea of diplomatic immunity is recognized and affirmed by
Calub and Valencia v. CA A suit against a public officer for his official acts is, in effect, a suit
Ruiz v. Cabahug The Government is not liable for the actions done by their public
Sayson v. Singzon The court ruled that once consent is secured, an action may be
Amigable v. Cuenca The doctrine of governmental immunity from suit cannot serve as an
Republic v. Sandiganbayan When the State enters into contract, through its officers or agents, in
Merritt v. Government By consenting to be sued a state simply waives its immunity from
Commissioner of Public Highways v.Although
San Diego
the government, as plaintiff in expropriation proceedings,
Villavicencio v. Lukban The court ruled that we are a government of laws and not of men, that
Belgica v. Ochoa The fact that the three great powers of government are intended to
Angara v. Electoral Commission When the judiciary mediates to allocate constitutional
Abakada Guro Party List v. PurisimaWhere an action of the legislative branch is alleged to have infringed the
Belgica v. Ochoa The legislature has no authority to execute or construe the law, the
Francisco v. HR There are two species of political questions: (1) "truly political questions"
Tanada v. Angara Where an action of the legislative branch is seriously alleged to have
Defensor v. Guingona In the absence of constitutional or statutory guidelines or specific
Vinuya v. Exec. Secretary The Court cannot interfere with or question the wisdom of the
Ocampo v. Enriquez Moreover, the limitation on the power of judicial review to actual cases
Jaworski v. PAGCOR PAGCOR can not delegate its power in view of the legal principle of
Belgica v. Ochoa There are two (2) fundamental tests to ensure that the legislative
Villena v. Secretary of Interior The court ruled that the Secretary of Interior has the power to suspend
Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS PREVAILING RULE - Unless the contrary is clearly intended, the
Tañada v. Angara These principles in Article II are not intended to be self-executing
Oposa v. Factoran The Court held that while the right to a balanced and healthful
Imbong v. Ochoa Verily, the principle of separation of church and state is based on mutual
Magallona v. Ermita Whether referred to as Philippine "internal waters" under Article I of the
Espina v. Zamora While Section 19, Article II of the 1987 Constitution requires the
BFAR Employees v. COA The SC ruled that the social justice provisions of the Constitution are not
Simon v. CHR CIVIL RIGHTS: rights appertaining to a person by virtue of his
Imbong v. Ochoa The Moment of Conception is Reckoned from
PT & T v. NLRC Sec. 14, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, expressly recognizes the role
Imbong v. Ochoa These provisions are self-executing. Unless the provisions clearly express
Oposa v. Factoran The Court held that while the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is
Lina v. Pano The principle of local autonomy under the 1987 Constitution simply means
Pamatong v. COMELEC What is important is equal access to the opportunity. If you broaden, it
Antolin v. Domondon The people's right to information is limited to "matters of public concern,"
Co v. HRET Under the Philippine Bill of 1902, inhabitants of the Philippines who
Dual citizenship are aquired by:
(1) Those born of Filipino fathers and/or mothers in foreign
countries which follow the principle of jus soli;
(2) Those born in the Philippines of Filipino mothers and alien fathers
if by the laws of their father's' country such children are citizens of
that country;
(3) Those who marry aliens if by the laws of the latter's country
Mercado v. Manzano
the former are considered citizens, unless by their act or omission
they are deemed to have renounced Philippine citizenship.
Dual allegiance, on the other hand, refers to the situation in which a
person simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more
states.
While dual citizenship is involuntary, dual allegiance is the result of an
individual's volition.
Lopez v. Comelec Those seeking elective public office in the Philippines must meet the
Jacot v. Dal Section 5(2) of Republic Act No. 9225 compels natural-born Filipinos,
Bengzon III v. HRET That the act of repatriation allows him to recover, or return to, his
Altajeros v. Comelec Poviding for the repatriation of Filipino women who have lost their
Calilung v. Secretary of Justice Section 5, Article IV of the Constitution is a declaration of a policy and it is
POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC Natural-born citizen upon reacquistion of citizenship by a Foundling.
GMA Network v. Comelec Fundamental to the idea of a democratic and republican state is the right
Gallego v. Verra In order to acquire a domicile by choice, there must concur (1)
Faypon v. Quirino It has also been settled that absence from residence to pursue studies or
Nicolas-Lewis v, Comelec There is no provision in the dual citizenship law – RA 9225 –
Velasco v. Comelec The right of dual citizens who vote as absentee voters pertain
Akbayan v. Comelec The SC ruled that the COMELEC, acted within the bounds and confines of
Defensor-Santiago v. Comelec The SC declared that R.A. No. 6735 inadequate to cover the
Lambino v. Comelec The SC that a people's initiative can only propose amendments to
Abakada Guro v. Purissima Public office is a public trust. It must be discharged by its holder not
Ombudsman Carpio-Morales v. CA and
TheBinay
concept of public office is a public trust and the corollary
Ocampo v. Enriquez
Francisco v. HR The court ruled that initiation takes place by the act of filing of the
Estrada v. Desierto The provision conveys two uncomplicated ideas: first, it tells us that
Gutierrez v. HR The filing of an impeachment complaint is like the lighting of a matchstick.
ITF v. Comelec The Constitution and R.A. No. 6770 endowed the Office of the
Ombudsman v. CA Under the Ombudsman act of 1989, the Office of the Ombudsman is
Khan v. Ombudsman The Office of the Ombudsman exercises jurisdiction over public
Corona v. Senate COMMITTED CULPABLE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND/OR
Presidential Ad Hoc v. Desierto
Rabe v. Flores
Impeachable Officials of the Philippines as of 26-OCT-2019
President
Vice President
Members of the SC Chief Justice
Justice
Retired as of 26-OCT Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Justice
Ombudsman
Constitutional Commissions
CSC Chairperson
Commissioner
Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner
CoA Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
COMELEC Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
26-OCT-2019
Rodrigo Duterte
Leni Robredo
Diosdado Peralta
Andres Reyes, Jr.
Antonio Carpio
Alfredo Caguioa
Alexander Gesmundo
Amy Lazaro-Javier
Ramon Hernando
Rosmari Carandang
Rodil Zalameda
Jose Reyes, Jr.
Jean Paul Inting
Estela Perlas Bernabe
Mario Leonen
Samuel Martires