(A) Calculation of WACC V R VR $ $ $: Dinla Co
(A) Calculation of WACC V R VR $ $ $: Dinla Co
(A) Calculation of WACC V R VR $ $ $: Dinla Co
(a)
Calculation of WACC
V r Vr
$ $ $
Equity (W1) 391,920
Debts:
Preference Shares
Loan Notes
Bank Loan
Workings:
W1:
Number of Shares 92,000
Market value/share 4
Total Market Value, V 391,920
Dividend, Do 0.25
Growth 1.04
Dividend, D1 0.26
Market Value,Po 4.26
Growth 0.04
C 0.10
BKB Co
(a)
V r Vr
Calculation of WACC $'000 % $'000
Ordinary shares (W1) 125,000.00 10% 12,500.00
7% Convertible bonds (W2) 21,000.00 6.37% 1,337.70
5% Preference shares (W3) 6,250.00 8% 500.00
152,250.00 14,337.70
Workings:
W1:
Cost of equity, r %
Risk free (%) 4.00
Risk premium (%) 5.00
Beta 1.20
Cost of equity, r 10.00
W2:
If redeem, $'000
Nominal 100.00
; As it is not stated how the convertible loan notes is redeemed, we assume it will be redeemed at nominal value and it is cons
If Convert, $'000
Growth (%) 4
Share price 5.00
At the end of year 5 6.08
Conversion ratio 19.00
Conversion value 115.58
IRR 5% 4%
Item Years Cashflow Df PV Df
Market Value 0 105.00 1.00 105.00 1.00
Interest 1 -4.90 0.95 -4.66 0.96
Interest 2 -4.90 0.91 -4.44 0.93
Interest 3 -4.90 0.86 -4.23 0.89
Interest 4 -4.90 0.82 -4.03 0.86
Interest + Redemption value 5 -120.48 0.78 -94.46 0.82
-6.83
a 4.00
b 5.00
NPVa -11.83
NPVb -6.83
NPV(a-b) -4.99
IRR 6.37
W3:
Cost of Preference Shares $'000
Io 0.05
Po 0.63
Cost of Pref.Shares , r 8.00
(b)
Why market value is preferred rather than book value cost of capital :
(c)
(d)
Attractions of covertible debts:
-Self liquidating. No need to redeem. It will turn into equity once converted
-Enhance Gearing. Debt will turn into equity and therefore will further reduce the gearing. Then, later easier lah apply loan
-More attractive than ordinary because of the conversion option. Act as 'sweetener'
-Lower interest rate bcs of the conversion option, investors are still willing to invest eventhough lower rate offered
emed at nominal value and it is constant in whichever year it is in.
PV
105.00
-4.71
-4.53
-4.36
-4.19
-99.04
-11.83
k value is likely to be lower than the market value. So, by using market value to calculate the cost of capital, it will prevent
will result in the return not as accurate as expected or simply said it will understate the return also.
alue, it can be converted to ordinary shares and the debt holder could be the owner of the company and has voting rights.
(a)
Growth,g %
Dividend Earliest 0.55
Dividend latest 0.62
Number of growths 3
Growth,g 4.07
Cost of equity, r $
Dividend Paid, Do 0.62
Growth, g (%) 4.07
D1 0.65
Market Value, Po 7.16
r (%) 13.14
(b)
As for dividend growth model, it assumes that the dividends will always be paid at the year end and there is a growth account
the growth of course is just an estimation which can be calculated using historic growth model (finding the average growth) or
Then the dividends will be constantly grow every year. However, as the calculation is based on the historical data, it may be in
Capital asset pricing model or CAPM is another method to calculate the cost of equity. It uses beta which is the average chang
premium which is the extra return needed to compensate for extra risk in the market. However, in this method, it assumes the
non-controllable. So, the risk free rate will be plus with the risk premium rate according to beta proportioned to reflect the co
directly while the dividend model assumes the inappropriate growth rate in the future years.
(c)
V r Vr
Calculation of WACC $'000 % $'000
Ordinary shares (a) 57,280.00 13% 7,526.59
8.5% Redeemable Bond (W1) 5,171.00 5.16% 266.82
62,451.00 7,793.42
Workings:
W1:
Item Years Cashflow
Market Value 0 103.42
Interest 1 -5.95
Interest 2 -5.95
Interest 3 -5.95
Interest 4 -5.95
Interest + Redemption value 5 -105.95
ich is the average change between the return of riskk free investment and market return to calculate the risk
s method, it assumes the investment has been well diversified leaving only systematic risk or market risk which is
rtioned to reflect the cost of equity. CAPM is preferred than dividend growth model as it links the return with the risk