This study investigated tooth agenesis patterns in 228 Japanese orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. The researchers found that the most common missing teeth were maxillary first and second premolars and mandibular second premolars. They observed 51 different patterns in the maxilla, 49 in the mandible, and 215 patterns between the arches. Symmetric patterns between left and right sides were more common than between upper and lower arches. The results suggest significant individual variation in tooth agenesis patterns in this population.
This study investigated tooth agenesis patterns in 228 Japanese orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. The researchers found that the most common missing teeth were maxillary first and second premolars and mandibular second premolars. They observed 51 different patterns in the maxilla, 49 in the mandible, and 215 patterns between the arches. Symmetric patterns between left and right sides were more common than between upper and lower arches. The results suggest significant individual variation in tooth agenesis patterns in this population.
This study investigated tooth agenesis patterns in 228 Japanese orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. The researchers found that the most common missing teeth were maxillary first and second premolars and mandibular second premolars. They observed 51 different patterns in the maxilla, 49 in the mandible, and 215 patterns between the arches. Symmetric patterns between left and right sides were more common than between upper and lower arches. The results suggest significant individual variation in tooth agenesis patterns in this population.
This study investigated tooth agenesis patterns in 228 Japanese orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. The researchers found that the most common missing teeth were maxillary first and second premolars and mandibular second premolars. They observed 51 different patterns in the maxilla, 49 in the mandible, and 215 patterns between the arches. Symmetric patterns between left and right sides were more common than between upper and lower arches. The results suggest significant individual variation in tooth agenesis patterns in this population.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8
TOOTH AGENISIS PATTERNS IN JAPANESE
ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS WITH NON
SYNDROMIC OLIGODONTIA Kazuhito Arai Tokyo, Japan
INTRODUCTION: Permanent tooth agenesis is one of the most
common developmental anomalies in humans and is often found in orthodontic patients. It has been clinically classified into 3 categories— hypodontia, oligodontia, and anodontia—based on the number of undeveloped teeth. Term oligodontia is defined as agenesis of 6 or more permanent teeth excluding 3rd molars. Prevalence of oligodontia ranges from 0.08 to 0.16 % in general population and higher prevalence has been reported in orthodontic patients. It is often associated with genetic syndromes like ectodermal dysplasia, klienfelter syndrome, intercontinentia pigmenti and asperger syndrome while the agenesis that occurs in non syndromic patients is termed as “Non syndromic oligodontia”. Location of the agenesis or the “pattern” is considerably important in orthodontic patients as agenesis of anterior teeth will have esthetic implications while agenesis in posterior region will influence the skeletal growth, masticatory function and orthodontic anchorage. Primary concern of patient presenting with oligodontia is mostly esthetic but functional and psychological problems of such patients are also serious. Management of such patients mostly requires a multi-disciplinary approach with the orthodontist playing an important role. Ethnic backgrounds have shown to be linked with different agenesis patterns and this study aims to expand the current knowledge of hereditary factors on oligodontia. Patients with oligodontia have a tendency for delayed tooth formation The purposes of the present study were to investigate the characteristics of permanent tooth agenesis patterns in orthodontic patients with non syndromic oligodontia in Japan and confirm the influence of evaluation cutoff age on analyses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Nippon Dental University, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo and the need for informed consent from individual patient was waived. To estimate the number of hypodontia and oligodontia patients, a preliminary questionnaire survey was conducted. According to the survey, 740 patients (508 female and 232 male) with hypodontia (excluding oligodontia) and 58 patients (31 female and 27 male) with oligodontia were found among 11,195 new patients (7253 female and 3942 male) in 2012. All members were mailed to select and send panoramic radiographs of orthodontic patients with oligodontia. Initial inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with agenesis of 6 or more permanent teeth, excluding third molars, diagnosed by means of an orthodontic clinical examination, with diagnostic records including panoramic radiographic examinations, cephalometric evaluation, and dental cast analysis. Exclusion criteria were: cleft lip or palate, ectodermal dysplasia, or other congenital anomalies. Records were sent to the author by mail on CD-ROMs. Before mailing, patient’s personal information (name and address) was removed. A total of 252 panoramic radiographs were collected during the evaluation process, 1 image was excluded because of poor image quality. Disagreement between the 2 evaluators occurred for 3 patients, whose images were excluded from the analyses (agreement rate 248/251 patients, 98.8%) from 71 clinics. Twenty patients were also excluded based on age for the following reasons: age unknown (n=2), age younger than 7 years (n=17), and age older than 25 years (n=1). Finally, 228 patients (141 female and 87 male) were selected. The number of missing teeth was counted for each patient, and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for female and male patients were calculated and compared by means of the Mann- Whitney U test. No significant difference was observed Tooth agenesis in other family members was reported for 48 patients (21.0%). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the median numbers of missing teeth per patient between older and younger groups according to cut off ages set from 8 to 14 years. Greatest number of missing teeth was observed for mandibular second premolars, followed by the maxillary first premolar Tooth agenesis patterns in right and left quadrants for the maxillary arch were pooled and 51 patterns were observed. Tooth agenesis patterns with higher prevalence included maxillary first and second premolars (24.8%), followed by maxillary second premolar only (10.3%). Forty-nine patterns were observed for the mandibular arch. Agenesis of second premolar only (25.0%) and first and second premolars (20.2%) was prominently higher than other patterns. The 50% cumulative frequency was reached with only 3 patterns For occluding tooth agenesis pattern between maxilla and mandible, 215 patterns were observed. The 50% cumulative frequency was reached with 27 patterns. For the full-mouth tooth agenesis pattern, 180 patterns were observed for the 228 patients. Among them, 164 patients showed a unique pattern. Sixty-six patterns were required to reach the 50% cumulative frequency Symmetric tooth agenesis patterns between right and left quadrants were observed in 50% of patients for both maxillary and mandibular arches, however, only 30% of patients showed a symmetric pattern in both arches. Twelve patients had the same pattern for all 4 quadrants. CONCLUSION: Following conclusions were made in this study: 1. As compared to the European population, Japanese population exhibits higher ranked tooth agenesis patterns including maxillary first and second and mandibular second premolars 2. The prevalence of symmetric patterns between right and left quadrants was significantly higher than observed between maxillary and mandibular antagonistic quadrants. 3. 456 possible tooth agenesis patterns were identified, 51 and 49 patterns were observed for the maxillary and mandibular quadrants, respectively. 215 patterns among 456 possible patterns for occluding tooth agenesis pattern and 180 patterns for full-mouth tooth agenesis patterns among 228 patients were observed, suggesting large individual variations.