Tokyo Presentation
Tokyo Presentation
Tokyo Presentation
10 Oct 2018
Tokyo, Japan
LOGISTICS
TETSUYA MIZUTANI
IHI CORPORATION - HOST
• No Commercialism
• No discussion of cost, pricing plans, pricing policies,
product usage surveys, marketing plans or any related
topics
• Presentations must focus on technical issues (not on
marketing aspects of products) and relate to or support
the development or maintenance of G-22 Committee work
• Be aware of and follow ITAR & EAR rules and regulations
governing export control
• Discussions should be open and follow the agenda or
other legitimate direction agreed upon by consensus of
the committee - avoid unauthorized or ‘private’ meetings
In 2036
4.5%/yr Increase in
Passenger Traffic
2 X active aircraft
=
worldwide
• The trend of manufacturing quality escape safety board issues that resulted
in at least one operational event has been increasing.
• The percentage of total turbofan ADs associated with manufacturing quality
escapes has been cyclic since 2004, but 2016 (37%) was the highest
percentage in the prior four years, and second only to 2011 (44%).
• The top drivers in turbofan manufacturing quality escape ADs were related to
issues with surface finish, incorrect dimensions, and forging (all with 8),
followed by incorrect assembly (7). Manufacturing Quality Escapes
• Life limited parts (32) made ECO Safety Board Issues That Included at Least One Operational Event
7
3
3
2 2 2
2
1
1
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Main targets
• To improve quality within the supply chain
• Improve on time delivery and minimize costs through a reliable
quality performance
• Gain efficiency by standardized processes
Product KCs
Supporting Standards: AS13000 Problem Solving; AS13001 DPRV Training; AS13002 Inspection Frequency;17
In process AS13005 Audit; AS13007 Supplier Management
Collaboration
• Working together to drive quality
performance
Feedback
• Provide input on developing standards
Training
• Coordinated training efforts
AS9117 DPRV
3 days 3 days
• One Common Training Requirement
3 days • Industry-wide DPRV database through SAE
Common Language
Supported by 3 Party Training & Consultancy
rd
* Rev A aligns with AS9117 - DPRV
AESQ – Aerospace Engine Supplier Quality Strategy Group 42
This document slide does not contain ITAR or EAR technical data. The content of this presentation slide is proprietary and
confidential information of the AESQ. It is not permitted to be distributed to any third party without the written consent of the AESQ.
AS13002 INSPECTION
FREQUENCY
ERIKA GRIMM, GE
Inspection Level
REDUCED Sample specific planning
AS9100
Design Risk
Analysis
Feedback
Key Product
Characteristics
AS13003 AS13002 AS13004 AS13006
Measurement System Alternate Inspection Process
Analysis Frequency Plans Process Flow Process Control Process Analysis
PFMEA Control Plan Monitoring &
(MSA) Diagram Method Selection and Improvement
Control
Product and
Foundational
Process Key
Activities
Characteristics
AS13006 designed to align and work closely with other industry standards
Related Standards
AS13000: Problem Solving Requirements (8D)
AS13002: Developing & Qualifying Alternative Inspection Frequency Plans
AS13003: Measurement Systems Analysis Requirements
AS9103: Variation Management of Key Characteristics
AS9145: Advanced Product Quality Planning & Production Part Approval Process
AESQ – Aerospace Engine Supplier Quality Strategy Group 89
This document slide does not contain ITAR or EAR technical data. The content of this presentation slide is proprietary and
confidential information of the AESQ. It is not permitted to be distributed to any third party without the written consent of the AESQ.
BENEFITS OF THE STANDARDS &
SUPPLIER CONTRIBUTIONS TO
AESQ
CATHERINE CATARINA-GRACA,
SAFRAN
FAULT DEFINITION
C00 CONDITIONING PACKAGING
P00 DOCUMENTATION
T00 MARKING / IDENTIFICATION / TRACEABILITY / MANAGEMENT (GENERIC)
V00 APPEARANCE / VISUAL / FINISH ( GENERIC)
DEPLOYED UNDEPLOYED
AESQ – Aerospace Engine Supplier Quality Strategy Group 59
This document slide does not contain ITAR or EAR technical data. The content of this presentation slide is proprietary and
confidential information of the AESQ. It is not permitted to be distributed to any third party without the written consent of the AESQ.
IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
8D Problem Solving
Must be applied as a ‘system’ of tools
Must be applied at part number level AS13000
Effectiveness relies on Cross Functional working
AS13004 Process FMEA & Control Plan
What’s New
1. A Process FMEA for every part
number
2. A Process FMEA that covers all
Process Steps (those that
transform the product)
3. A Process FMEA that covers all
design features /
characteristics*
4. Failure Modes that describe how
the PRODUCT can fail to meet
Design Intent
5. A Control Plan for every part
Number
* Rolls-Royce Deployment Requirement
AS13004 Process FMEA & Control Plan
DON’T PANIC!
It is an achievable task, thanks to ;
59
SAM SUZHOU CASE STUDY
Deploying AS13004 to Achieve Zero Defects
Honglei Zhu
Production Manager
SAM (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
RFT improvement
Benefits
Lessons learnt
Our precision business segment focuses primarily on niche products such as engine
mounts, airfoils, engine cases and structural parts. Our equipment business
segment is vertically integrated to offer unique engineering solutions from
collaborative design and development, to finished equipment assembly.
Headquartered in
Singapore
AEROSPACE
Contract
OEM Products
Manufacturing
EQUIPMENT
64
SAM Suzhou
• Geographical Location: Suzhou, China, 2
hours to Shanghai
• Incorporated in 1995, 2004 relocated in EPZ
• Factory Size: 150,000 sq ft
• Land Size: 250,000 sq ft
• Location: Export Processing Zone, SIP
• Manpower: 410
• Machine capabilities:
5 Flexible manufacturing system Lines
Milling 49,Turning 9,Grinding 4,CMM 5,
others(SP) 35
Manager
9
Engineer
60
65
Drive For Zero Defects
In Dec,2016
SAM was Invited to join the movement
Working Together…
PFMEA output
RFT
Achieve:
100% RFT
0 Escape
Concession Reduction
Recommend Actions:
1. Change cutting method to Reaming;
2. Move to H M/C (with RFID, less human touch, close door machining);
3. Enhance 5S management; Handling Trolley Improvement Project;
4. Enhance Supplier Engagement;
5. Case study for cutting tools improvement;
Proprietary Information of SAM
Lessons learnt from AS13004
P/N: KH17504 Pareto Chart P/N: KH17504 Pareto Chart
by NON-Conforming Chart by Rejection Code
Classification
Functi
Potenti Potential bility&
Severity
Feature on/ Recomm
Drg Sheet Operatio al Potential Effect(s) of Cause(s) Target
Num Step Prevent RPN ended
Occurrence
Occurrence
(A2) n Failure Failure of Completio Actions
Detection
Detection
Severity
(A3) ion Action
Descri Mode Failure Detection n Date Taken
Dim Control RPN
ption Controls Completi
(B1) Tol (-) Tol (+) s
on Date
(B2) (B3)
[Customer Effect]5
Increased wear of pin - tool ID
early scrappage/repair visual
bore gauge
CCF Ø Above [Manufacturing / Assembly wrong check,
SH3 38 & 45 170 Reaming E 0.0125 0.0125 5 CCF 3 in station by 5 75
37.0215 top limit Effect]5 A proportion of tooling tool
operator
production run may have to presetter
be reworked off line and check,
accepted
CCF
j│ Ø 0.05 Move to
0.05m│E Heller M/C Action
tool
to Owner
presetter in station
wrong tool implement Xu Hua
SH3 39 & 46 170 Reaming E NA 6 routine, 3 dimensional 5 90 6 5 2 60
setting automated Target date
qualified check
tooling December-
CCF j│ Ø operators,
0.10m│A 0.1 control 2018
│Bm-Cm routine
Vendor
Code:228537
Supplier Name:SAM
(Suzhou) Co., Ltd. PROCESS CONTROL PLAN
Document No. Part No.(s) Issue number Issue date Approval (stamp/sign)
KH17504 CP001 KH17504 1 24/05/2018
Document Category (circle / delete) Part Classification
Pre-Prod. Prod. Sensitive
EC 170 Milling MC-MN4H69 42 CCF i│ 0.50│ B-C Work offset CCF Within 0.03mm Probe check All 100% Operator MOM Inform leader
EC 170 Milling MC-MN4H69 46 CCF j│ Ø Work offset CCF Within 0.03mm Probe check All 100% Operator MOM Inform leader
0.10m│A│Bm-Cm
Coolant
EC 170 Milling MC-MN4H69 49 Ra 0.8 10%+/-5% test paper All 100% Operator MOM Inform leader
concentration
Honglei Zhu
Production Manager
SAM (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
Picture
SAE INTERNATIONAL
HOW TO BE EFFICIENT BY
USING REFERENCE PFMEA
How to Create and Manage Part Specific
Process FMEAs using a Reference FMEA
Database
Potential S O D R
Potential Potential Prevention Detection
Process Requirements Failure E C E P
Effects V Causes Controls C Controls N
Modes T
Fuel leak 2
Oversize Tool pre- Bore mic
leading to 9 4 7 5
OP10 Drill Fuel Hole explosion tool setting at OP 50 2
Hole too
CNC 50mm Diameter Big
+/- 1.0 mm Spindle Asset Care Weekly 2
Drilling
Scrap part 6 alignment & 3 ball bar 8 1
error Calibration check 6
Slight
Oversize Tool pre- Bore mic 5
increase in 3 2 7
OP20 Drill Air Hole noise level tool setting at OP 50 6
Hole too
CNC 50mm Diameter Big
+/- 3.0 mm Spindle Asset Care Weekly
Drilling 3
Concession 4 alignment & 1 ball bar 8 2
error Calibration check
Blue Boxes show the (partial) content of a Reference PFMEA for Hole Drilling where the
Failure Mode is ‘Hole Too Big’
76
Creating a Part Specific PFMEA using
Reference FMEAs
The team may need to add in additional Failure Modes, Potential Causes and/or Control
information based on their knowledge of the specific part numbers. Some information in the
Reference PFMEA may not be relevant so can be deleted.
How long does it take to complete an AS13004 Process FMEA?
GKN Newington
Trent 7000 Fan Case
Defect Free at Product
Introduction
SAM Suzhou
XWB Engine
Mounts
Defect Free
It really is that easy…..
Good luck.
AS13003 MSA
4/4/2017
Proprietary Notice
This document contains proprietary information of the MTU Aero Engines AG group
companies. The document and its contents shall not be copied or disclosed to any third
party or used for any purpose other than that for which it is provided, without the prior
written agreement of MTU Aero Engines AG.
4/4/2017 85
© MTU Aero Engines AG. The information contained herein is proprietary to the MTU Aero Engines group companies.
General Approach
Guiding Questions
“Method 1” “Method 2”
Is the gage precise and accurate enough to What happens in real production line
rely on it? conditions?
What happens if the same inspector measures the
How big is the variance of my Calculation of the
same part without knowing the results from his last
measurement? value cg >1,33
measurements?
%
GR&R
Total
What happens when a different inspector measures Variance
Is there a systematic error in the Calculation of the
the same part without knowing the results from his
measurement? value cgk >1,33
coworker?
3/28/2017 MSA@MTU 86
© MTU Aero Engines AG. The information contained herein is proprietary to the MTU Aero Engines group companies.
Hands-on Example Case, Turbine
3/28/2017 MSA@MTU 87
© MTU Aero Engines AG. The information contained herein is proprietary to the MTU Aero Engines group companies.
Actions defined due to results from the MSA Case, Turbine
3/28/2017 MSA@MTU 88
© MTU Aero Engines AG. The information contained herein is proprietary to the MTU Aero Engines group companies.
Lessons Learned up to now
• By using the MSA method you get a reliable and understandable statement if you can rely
on your results or not
don’t touch your production processes before you are sure about your measurement
• Cg & Cgk database is a great support to discuss drawing requirements with the design
organization
• An MSA helps to eliminate influences coming from different measurement strategies
• A CMM measurement is not always reliable – accuracy and inspector variance matters
• High quality of existing measurement programs as in most cases only a few characteristics
show a significant variance
• A comparison to an independent reference measurement gives a valuable insight into the
production line measurement;
not easy to achieve due to the small tolerances and the expectation to be more precise
• For tighter tolerances the method is very challenging and even a difference of 1/10 µm
between reference & production results can be the reason for an incapable system -> Rules
for these special cases are necessary
3/28/2017 MSA@MTU 89
© MTU Aero Engines AG. The information contained herein is proprietary to the MTU Aero Engines group companies.
FUTURE INITIATIVES
BARRIE HICKLIN, HONEYWELL
Customer /
IAQG APQP & PPAP – AS9145 Audit 3rd party
audits
Process Planning
NC Material
Process Control Problem
PFMEA Source &
Flow Plan Inspection Solving
Method Supplier
Frequency (Subtier)
Change
Management
FOD
MSA Counterfeit
FAI Process Control Parts /
(Variation Management) Ethics
Production Compliance
Readiness Tooling /
SPC incl. KPIs incl.
Assessment Ppk / Cpk fixture
short run RFT DPRV
mgmt NDT
Training
Published Standard AESQ working in IAQG Team Current Workstream Potential future workstream
Comparative
Analysis
Next
Priority & White
Supplier Input Work
Feasibility Paper
Stream
Member
Input
Interpretation
Guidance (8D)
(partial / full FAI)
Main targets
• To improve quality within the supply chain
• Improve on time delivery and minimize costs through a reliable
quality performance
• Gain efficiency by standardized processes