Shinto
Shinto
Shinto
Although historians debate at what point it is suitable to refer to Shinto as a distinct religion, kami veneration
has been traced back to Japan's Yayoi period (300 BCE to 300 CE). Buddhism entered Japan at the end of the
Kofun period (300 to 538 CE) and spread rapidly. Religious syncretisation made kami worship and Buddhism
functionally inseparable, a process called shinbutsu-shūgō. The kami came to be viewed as part of Buddhist
cosmology and were increasingly depicted anthropomorphically. The earliest written tradition regarding kami
worship was recorded in the eighth-century Kojiki and Nihon Shoki. In ensuing centuries, shinbutsu-shūgō
was adopted by Japan's Imperial household. During the Meiji era (1868 to 1912 CE), Japan's leadership
expelled Buddhist influence from kami worship and formed State Shinto, which they used to foment
nationalism and imperial worship. Shrines came under growing government influence, and the emperor of
Japan was elevated to a particularly high position as a kami. With the formation of the Japanese Empire in the
early 20th century, Shinto was exported to other areas of East Asia. Following Japan's defeat in World War II,
Shinto was formally separated from the state.
Shinto is primarily found in Japan, where there are around 100,000 public shrines, although practitioners are
also found abroad. Numerically, it is Japan's largest religion, the second being Buddhism. Most of the
country's population takes part in both Shinto and Buddhist activities, especially festivals, reflecting a common
view in Japanese culture that the beliefs and practices of different religions need not be exclusive. Aspects of
Shinto have also been incorporated into various Japanese new religious movements.
Contents
Definition
Categorization
Etymology
Beliefs
Kami
Cosmology and afterlife
Purity and impurity
Kannagara, morality, and ethics
Practice
Shrines
Priesthood and miko
Visits to shrines
Harae and hōbei
Home Shrines
Ema, divination, and amulets
Kagura
Festivals
Rites of passage
Spirit mediumship and healing
History
Early development
Nara period
Syncretism with Buddhism
Kokugaku
Meiji era and the Empire of Japan
Post-war
Demographics
Outside Japan
Study of Shinto
See also
Notes
References
Citations
Sources
Further reading
External links
Definition
There is no universally agreed definition of Shinto.[1] However, the authors Joseph Cali and John Dougill
stated that if there was "one single, broad definition of Shinto" that could be put forward, it would be that
"Shinto is a belief in kami", the supernatural entities at the centre of the religion.[2] The Japanologist Helen
Hardacre stated that "Shinto encompasses doctrines, institutions, ritual, and communal life based on kami
worship",[3] while the scholar of religion Inoue Nobutaka observed the term was "often used" in "reference to
kami worship and related theologies, rituals and practices."[4] Various
scholars have referred to practitioners of Shinto as Shintoists, although
this term has no direct translation in the Japanese language.[5]
Categorization
Many scholars describe Shinto as a religion.[12] However, some practitioners prefer to view Shinto as a
"way",[13] thus characterising it more as custom or tradition than religion,[14] partly as a pretence for
attempting to circumvent the modern Japanese separation of religion and state and restore Shinto's historical
links with the Japanese state.[15] Moreover, religion as a concept arose in Europe and many of the
connotations that the term has in Western culture "do not readily apply" to Shinto.[16] Unlike religions familiar
in Western countries, such as Christianity and Islam, Shinto has no single founder,[17] nor any single canonical
text.[18] Western religions tend to stress exclusivity, but in Japan, it has long been considered acceptable to
practice different religious traditions simultaneously.[19] Japanese religion is therefore highly pluralistic.[20]
Shinto is often cited alongside Buddhism as one of Japan's two main religions,[21] and the two often differ in
focus, with Buddhism emphasising the idea of transcending the cosmos, which it regards as being replete with
suffering, while Shinto focuses on adapting to the pragmatic requirements of life.[22] Shinto has integrated
elements from religious traditions imported into Japan from mainland Asia, such as Buddhism, Confucianism,
Taoism, and Chinese divination practices.[23] It bears many similarities with other East Asian religions, in
particular through its belief in many deities.[24]
There is substantial local variation in how Shinto is practiced;[35] the anthropologist John K. Nelson noted it
was "not a unified, monolithic entity that has a single center and system all its own".[31] Different types of
Shinto have been identified. "Shrine Shinto" refers to the practices centred around shrines,[36] and "Domestic
Shinto" to the ways in which kami are venerated in the home.[37] Some scholars have used the term "Folk
Shinto" to designate localised Shinto practices,[38] or practices outside of an institutionalised setting.[31] In
various eras of the past, there was also a "State Shinto", in which Shinto beliefs and practices were closely
interlinked with the Japanese state.[36] In representing "a portmanteau term" for many varied traditions across
Japan, the term "Shinto" is similar to the term "Hinduism", used to describe varied traditions across South
Asia.[39]
Etymology
The term Shinto is often translated into English as "the way of the
kami",[40] although its meaning has varied throughout Japanese
history.[41] Other terms are sometimes used synonymously with
"Shinto"; these include kami no michi ("way of the kami"),
kannagara no michi ("way of the divine transmitted from time
immemorial"), Kodō ("the ancient way"), Daidō ("the great way"),
and Teidō ("the imperial way").[42]
A torii gate at the Takachiho-gawara
The term Shinto derives from the combination of two Chinese
神 道
characters: shen ( ), which means Spirit, and dao ( ), which means shrine near Kirishima, Kagoshima
Prefecture, which is associated with
"way", "road" or "path".[43] The Chinese term Shendao was the mythological tale of Ninigi-no-
originally adopted into Japanese as Jindō;[44] this was possibly first Mikoto's descent to earth.
used as a Buddhist term to refer to non-Buddhist deities.[45] Among
the earliest known appearances of the term Shinto in Japan is in the
8th-century text, Nihon Shoki.[46] Here, it may be a generic term for popular belief,[47] or alternatively
reference Taoism, as many Taoist practices had recently been imported from mainland Asia.[48] In these early
Japanese uses, the word Shinto did not apply to a distinct religious tradition nor to anything uniquely
Japanese;[49] the 11th century Konjaku monogatarishui for instance refers to a woman in China practicing
Shinto, and also to people in India worshipping kami, indicating these terms were being used to describe
religions outside Japan itself.[50]
In medieval Japan, kami-worship was generally seen as being part of Japanese Buddhism, with the kami
themselves often being interpreted as Buddhas.[51] At this point, the term Shinto increasingly referred to "the
authority, power, or activity of a kami, being a kami, or, in short, the state or attributes of a kami."[52] It
appears in this form in texts such as Nakatomi no harai kunge and Shintōshū tales.[52] In the Japanese
Portuguese Dictionary of 1603, Shinto is defined as referring to "kami or matters pertaining to kami."[53] The
term Shinto became common in the 15th century.[54] During the late Edo period, the kokugaku scholars began
using the term Shinto to describe what they believed was an ancient, enduring and indigenous Japanese
tradition that predated Buddhism; they argued that Shinto should be used to distinguish kami worship from
traditions like Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism.[55] This use of the term Shinto became increasingly
popular from the 18th century.[9] The term Shinto only gained common use from the early 20th century
onward, when it superseded the term taikyō ('great religion') as the name for the Japanese state religion.[39]
Beliefs
Kami
In Japan, kami have been venerated since prehistory,[3] and in the Yayoi period were regarded as being
formless and invisible.[69] It was only under the influence of Buddhism that they were depicted
anthropomorphically;[70] statues of the kami are known as shinzo.[71] Kami are usually associated with a
specific place, often one that is noted as a prominent feature in the landscape such as a waterfall, volcano, large
rock, or distinctive tree.[38] Physical objects or places in which the kami are believed to have a presence are
termed shintai;[72] objects inhabited by the kami that are placed in the shrine are known as go-shintai.[73]
Objects commonly chosen for this purpose include mirrors, swords, stones, beads, and inscribed tablets.[74]
These go-shintai are concealed from the view of visitors,[75] and may be hidden inside boxes so that even the
priests do not know what they look like.[72]
Kami are believed to be capable of both benevolent and destructive deeds;[76] if warnings about good conduct
are ignored, the kami can mete out punishment called shinbatsu, often taking the form of illness or sudden
death.[77] Some kami, referred to as the magatsuhi-no-kami or araburu kami, are regarded as being essentially
malevolent and destructive.[78] Offerings and prayers are given to the kami to gain their blessings and to
dissuade them from engaging in destructive actions.[2] Shinto seeks to cultivate and ensure a harmonious
relationship between humans and the kami and thus with the natural world.[79] More localised kami may be
subject to feelings of intimacy and familiarity from members of the local community that are not directed
towards more widespread kami like Amaterasu.[80] The kami of a particular community is referred to it as their
ujigami,[81] while that of a particular house is the yashikigami.[82]
Kami are not understood as being metaphysically different from humanity,[64] and in Shinto it is seen as
possible for humans to become kami.[59] Dead humans are sometimes venerated as kami, being regarded as
protector or ancestral figures.[83] One of the most prominent examples is that of the Emperor Ōjin, who on his
death was enshrined as the kami Hachiman, believed to be a protector of Japan and a kami of war.[38] In
Japanese culture, ancestors can be viewed as a form of kami.[84] In Western Japan, the term jigami is used to
describe the enshrined kami of a village founder.[85] In some cases, living human beings were also viewed as
kami;[2] these were called akitsumi kami[86] or arahito-gami.[87] In the State Shinto system of the Meiji era,
the Emperor of Japan was declared to be a kami,[59] while several Shinto sects have also viewed their leaders
as living kami.[59]
Many kami are believed to have messengers, known as kami no tsukai or tsuka washime, and these are
generally depicted as taking animal form.[88] The messenger of Inari, for example, is depicted as a fox
(kitsune),[91] while the messenger of Hachiman is a dove.[88] Shinto cosmology also includes bakemono,
spirits who cause malevolent acts.[92] Bakemono include oni, tengu, kappa, mononoke, and yamanba.[92]
Japanese folklore also incorporates belief in the goryō or onryō, unquiet or vengeful spirits, particularly of
those who have died violently and without appropriate funerary rites.[93] These are believed to inflict suffering
on the living, meaning that they must be pacified, usually through Buddhist rites but sometimes through
enshrining them as a kami.[93] Other Japanese supernatural figures include the tanuki, animal like creatures
who can take human form.[94]
The origin of the kami and of Japan itself are recounted in two eighth-century texts, Kojiki and Nihon
Shoki,[95] although the accounts they provide differ in part.[96] Drawing heavily on Chinese influence,[97]
these texts were commissioned by ruling elites to legitimize and consolidate their rule.[98] Although never of
great importance to Japanese religious life,[99] in the early 20th century the government proclaimed that the
accounts within them was factual history.[100]
The Kojiki recounts that the universe started with ame-tsuchi, the separation of light and pure elements (ame,
"heaven") from heavy elements (tsuchi, "earth").[101] Three kami then appeared: Amenominakanushi,
Takamimusuhi no Mikoto, and Kamimusuhi no Mikoto. Other kami followed, including a brother and sister,
Izanagi and Izanami.[102] The kami instructed Izanagi and Izanami to create land on earth. To this end, the
siblings stirred the briny sea with a jewelled spear, from which Onogoro Island was formed.[103] Izanagi and
Izanami then descended to Earth, where the latter gave birth to further kami. One of these was a fire kami,
whose birth killed Izanami.[104] Izanagi then descended to the netherworld
(yomi) to retrieve his sister, but there he saw her body putrefying. Embarrassed to
be seen in this state, she chased him out of yomi, and he closed its entrance with
a boulder.[105]
Izanagi bathed in the sea to rid himself from the pollution brought about by
witnessing Izanami's putrefaction. Through this act, further kami emerged from
his body: Amaterasu (the sun kami) was born from his left eye, Tsukuyomi (the
moon kami) from his right eye, and Susanoo (the storm kami) from his nose.[106]
Susanoo behaved in a destructive manner, and to escape him Amaterasu hid
herself within a cave, plunging the earth into darkness. The other kami eventually
succeeded in coaxing her out.[107] Susanoo was then banished to earth, where he
married and had children.[108] According to the Kojiki, Amaterasu then sent her
grandson, Ninigi, to rule Japan, giving him curved beads, a mirror, and a sword:
the symbols of Japanese imperial authority.[109]
In Shinto, the creative principle permeating all life is known as musubi, and is
associated with its own kami.[110] Within traditional Japanese thought, there is no
concept of an overarching duality between good and evil.[111] The concept of Izanami-no-Mikoto and
aki encompasses misfortune, unhappiness, and disaster, although does not Izanagi-no-Mikoto, by
correspond precisely with the Western concept of evil.[111] There is no Kobayashi Eitaku, late
eschatology in Shinto.[112] 19th century
Texts such as the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki attest to the presence of multiple realms
in Shinto cosmology.[113] These present a universe divided into three parts: the Plain of High Heaven
(Takama-no-hara), where the kami live; the Phenomenal or Manifested World (Utsushi-yo), where humans
dwell; and the Nether World (Yomotsu-kuni), where unclean spirits reside.[114] The mythological texts
nevertheless do not draw firm demarcations between these realms.[115] Shinto places greater emphasis on this
life than on any afterlife.[116] As the historian of religion Joseph Kitagawa noted, "Japanese religion has been
singularly preoccupied with this world, with its emphasis on finding ways to cohabit with the kami and with
other human beings".[117] Mythological stories describe yomi-no-kuni as a realm of the dead,[112] while
another belief formerly widespread in Japan was that the spirits of the dead resided in the mountains, from
where they would descend to take part in agricultural events.[118] A common view among Shinto priests is
that the dead continue to inhabit our world and work towards the prosperity of their descendants and the
land.[119]
A key theme in Shinto is the avoidance of kegare ("pollution" or "impurity"),[120] while ensuring harae
("purity").[121] In Japanese thought, humans are seen as fundamentally pure.[122] Kegare is therefore seen as
being a temporary condition that can be corrected through achieving harae.[123] Rites of purification are
conducted so as to restore an individual to "spiritual" health and render them useful to society.[124]
This notion of purity is present in many facets of Japanese culture, such as the focus it places on bathing.[125]
Purification is for instance regarded as important in preparation for the planting season,[126] while performers
of noh theatre undergo a purification rite before they carry out their performances.[127] Among the things
regarded as particular pollutants in Shinto are death, disease, witchcraft, the flaying alive of an animal, incest,
bestiality, excrement, and blood associated with either menstruation or childbirth.[128] To avoid kegare, priests
and other practitioners may engage in abstinence and avoid various activities prior to a festival or ritual.[123]
Various words, termed imi-kotoba, are also regarded as taboo, and people avoid speaking them when at a
shrine; these include shi (death), byō (illness), and shishi (meat).[129]
A purification ceremony known as misogi involves the use of fresh
water, salt water, or salt to remove kegare.[130] Full immersion in the
sea is often regarded as the most ancient and efficacious form of
purification.[131] This act links with the mythological tale in which
Izanagi immersed himself in the sea to purify himself after discovering
his deceased wife; it was from this act that other kami sprang from his
body.[132] An alternative is immersion beneath a waterfall.[133] Salt is
Shinto purification rite after a often regarded as a purifying substance;[134] some Shinto practitioners
ceremonial children's sumo will for instance sprinkle salt on themselves after a funeral,[135] while
tournament at the Kamigamo Jinja in those running restaurants may put a small pile of salt outside before
Kyoto business commences each day.[136] Fire, also, is perceived as a source
of purification.[137] The yaku-barai is a form of harae designed to
prevent misfortune,[138] while the oharae, or "ceremony of great
purification", is often used for end-of-year purification rites, and is conducted twice a year at many
shrines.[139] Before the Meiji period, rites of purification were generally performed by onmyōji, a type of
diviner whose practices derived from the Chinese yin and yang philosophy. [140]
In Shinto, kannagara ("way of the kami") describes the law of the natural order.[141] Shinto incorporates
morality tales and myths but no overarching, codified ethical doctrine;[2] Offner noted that Shinto specified no
"unified, systematized code of behaviour".[18] Its views of kannagara influence certain ethical views, focused
on sincerity (makoto) and honesty (tadashii).[141] Makoto is regarded as a cardinal virtue in Japanese religion
more broadly.[142] Shinto sometimes includes reference to four virtues known as the akaki kiyoki kokoro or
sei-mei-shin, meaning "purity and cheerfulness of heart", which are linked to the state of harae.[143] Offner
believed that in Shinto, ideas about goodness linked to "that which possesses, or relates to, beauty, brightness,
excellence, good fortune, nobility, purity, suitability, harmony, conformity, [and] productivity."[144] Shojiki is
regarded as a virtue, encompassing honesty, uprightness, veracity, and frankness.[145] Shinto's flexibility
regarding morality and ethics has been a source of frequent criticism, especially from those arguing that the
religion can readily become a pawn for those wishing to use it to legitimise their authority and power.[146]
Throughout Japanese history, the notion of saisei-itchi, or the union of religious authority and political
authority, has long been prominent.[147] Cali and Dougill noted that Shinto had long been associated with "an
insular and protective view" of Japanese society.[148] They added that in the modern world, Shinto tends
toward conservatism and nationalism.[148] In the late 1990s, Bocking noted that "an apparently regressive
nationalism still seems the natural ally of some central elements" of Shinto.[149] As a result of these
associations, Shinto is still viewed suspiciously by various civil liberties groups in Japan and by many of
Japan's neighbours.[149]
Shinto priests may face various ethical conundrums. In the 1980s, for instance, the priests at the Suwa Shrine
in Nagasaki debated whether to invite the crew of a U.S. Navy vessel docked at the port city to their festival
celebrations given the sensitivities surrounding the 1945 U.S. use of the atomic bomb on the city.[150] In other
cases, priests have opposed construction projects on shrine-owned land, sometimes putting them at odds with
other interest groups.[151] At Kaminoseki in the early 2000s, a priest opposed the sale of shrine lands to build a
nuclear power plant; he was eventually pressured to resign over the issue.[152] Another issue of considerable
debate has been the activities of the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo. The shrine is devoted to Japan's war dead, and
in 1979 it enshrined 14 men, including Hideki Tojo, who had been declared Class-A defendants at the 1946
Tokyo War Crimes Trials. This generated both domestic and international condemnation, particularly from
China and Korea.[153]
In the 21st century, Shinto has increasingly been portrayed as a
nature-centred spirituality with environmentalist credentials.[154]
Shinto shrines have increasingly emphasised the preservation of the
forests surrounding many of them,[155] and several shrines have
collaborated with local environmentalist campaigns.[156] In 2014, an
international interreligious conference on environmental sustainability
was held at the Ise shrine, attended by United Nations representatives
and around 700 Shinto priests.[157] Critical commentators have
characterised the presentation of Shinto as an environmentalist
The actions of priests at the
movement as a rhetorical ploy rather than a concerted effort by Shinto
Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo have
institutions to become environmentally sustainable.[158] The scholar generated controversy across East
Aike P. Rots suggested that the repositioning of Shinto as a "nature Asia
religion" may have grown in popularity as a means of disassociating
the religion from controversial issues "related to war memory and
imperial patronage."[29]
Practice
Shinto tends to focus on ritual behavior rather than doctrine.[159] The philosophers James W. Boyd and Ron
G. Williams stated that Shinto is "first and foremost a ritual tradition",[160] while Picken observed that "Shinto
is interested not in credenda but in agenda, not in things that should be believed but in things that should be
done."[161] The scholar of religion Clark B. Offner stated that Shinto's focus was on "maintaining communal,
ceremonial traditions for the purpose of human (communal) well-being".[144] It is often difficult to distinguish
Shinto practices from Japanese customs more broadly,[162] with Picken observing that the "worldview of
Shinto" provided the "principal source of self-understanding within the Japanese way of life".[161] Nelson
stated that "Shinto-based orientations and values[…] lie at the core of Japanese culture, society, and
character".[163]
Shrines
Public spaces in which the kami are worshipped are often known
under the generic term jinja ("kami-place");[164] this term applies to
the location rather than to a specific building.[165] Jinja is usually
translated as "shrine" in English,[166] although in earlier literature was
sometimes translated as "temple",[5] a term now more commonly
reserved for Japan's Buddhist structures.[167] There are around
100,000 public shrines in Japan;[168] about 80,000 are affiliated with
the Association of Shinto Shrines,[169] with another 20,000 being
unaffiliated.[170] They are found all over the country, from isolated
The main gate to Fushimi Inari-taisha
rural areas to dense metropolitan ones.[171] More specific terms are
in Kyoto, one of the oldest shrines in
sometimes used for certain shrines depending on their function; some
Japan
of the grand shrines with imperial associations are termed jingū,[172]
those devoted to the war dead are termed shokonsha,[145] and those
linked to mountains deemed to be inhabited by kami are yama-miya.[173]
The architectural styles of Shinto shrines had largely developed by the Heian period.[174] The inner sanctuary
in which the kami is believed to live is known as a honden.[175] Inside the honden may be stored material
regarded as belonging to the kami; known as shinpo, this can include artworks, clothing, weapons, musical
instruments, bells, and mirrors.[176] Typically, worshippers carry out their acts outside of the honden.[21] Near
the honden can sometimes be found a subsidiary shrine, the bekkū, to another kami; the kami inhabiting this
shrine is not necessarily perceived as being inferior to that in the honden.[177] At some places, halls of worship
have been erected, termed haiden.[178] On a lower level can be found the hall of offerings, known as a
heiden.[179] Together, the building housing the honden, haiden, and heiden is called a hongū.[180] In some
shrines, there is a separate building in which to conduct additional ceremonies, such as weddings, known as a
gishikiden,[181] or a specific building in which the kagura dance is performed, known as the kagura-den.[182]
Collectively, the central buildings of a shrine are known as the shaden,[183] while its precincts are known as
the keidaichi[184] or shin'en.[185] This precinct is surrounded by the tamagaki fence,[186] with entry via a
shinmon gate, which can be closed at night.[187]
Shrines are often set within gardens, even in cities.[194] Others are surrounded by wooded groves, referred to
as chinju no mori ("forest of the tutelary kami").[195] These vary in size, from just a few trees to sizeable areas
of woodland stretching over mountain slopes.[196] Large lanterns, known as tōrō, are often found within these
precints.[197] Shrines often have an office, known as a shamusho,[198] a saikan where priests undergo forms
of abstinence and purification prior to conducting rituals,[199] and other buildings such as a priests' quarters
and a storehouse.[190] Various kiosks often sell amulets to visitors.[200] Since the late 1940s, shrines have had
to be financially self-sufficient, relying on the donations of worshippers and visitors. These funds are used to
pay the wages of the priests, to finance the upkeep of the buildings, to cover the shrine's membership fees of
various regional and national Shinto groups, and to contribute to disaster relief funds.[201]
In Shinto, it is seen as important that the places in which kami are venerated be kept clean and not
neglected.[202] Through to the Edo period, it was common for kami shrines to be demolished and rebuilt at a
nearby location so as to remove any pollutants and ensure purity.[203] This has continued into recent times at
certain sites, such as the Ise Grand Shrine, which is moved to an adjacent site every two decades.[204] Separate
shrines can also be merged in a process known as jinja gappei,[205] while the act of transferring the kami from
one building to another is called sengu.[206] Shrines may have legends about their foundation, which are
known as en-gi. These sometimes also record miracles associated with the shrine.[207] From the Heian period
on, the en-gi were often retold on picture scrolls known as emakimono.[208]
Shrines may be cared for by priests, by local communities, or by families on whose property the shrine is
found.[21] Shinto priests are known in Japanese as kannushi, meaning "proprietor of kami",[209] or
alternatively as shinshoku or shinkan.[210] Many kannushi take on the role in a line of hereditary succession
traced down specific families.[211] In contemporary Japan, there are two main training universities for those
wishing to become kannushi, at Kokugakuin University in Tokyo and at Kogakkan University in Mie
Prefecture.[212] Priests can rise through the ranks over the course of their careers.[213] The number of priests at
a particular shrine can vary; some shrines can have over 12 priests,
and others have none, instead being administered by local lay
volunteers.[214] Some priests earn a living administering to multiple
small shrines, sometimes over ten or more.[215]
The priests are assisted by jinja miko, sometimes referred to as "shrine-maidens" in English.[232] These miko
are typically unmarried,[233] although not necessarily virgins.[234] In many cases they are the daughters of a
priest or a practitioner.[232] They are subordinate to the priests in the shrine hierarchy.[235] Their most
important role is in the kagura dance, known as otome-mai.[236] Miko receive only a small salary but gain
respect from members of the local community and learn skills such as cooking, calligraphy, painting, and
etiquette which can benefit them when later searching for employment or a marriage partner.[236] They
generally do not live at the shrines.[236] Sometimes they fill other roles, such as being secretaries in the shrine
offices or clerks at the information desks, or as waitresses at the naorai feasts. They also assist Kannushi in
ceremonial rites.[236]
Visits to shrines
A generic name for a visit to the shrine, whether on a pilgrimage or as part of a regular activity, is sankei.[237]
Individual worship conducted at a shrine is known as hairei.[238] A visit to a shrine, which is known as jinja
mairi in Japanese, typically takes only a few minutes.[239] Some individuals visit the shrines every day, often
on their route to work each morning.[239] These rituals usually take place not inside the honden itself but in an
oratory in front of it.[240] The general procedure entails an individual approaching the honden, where the
practitioners places a monetary offering in a box before ringing a bell to call the attention of the kami.[241]
Then, they bow, clap, and stand while silently offering a prayer.[242] The clapping is known as kashiwade or
hakushu;[243] the prayers or supplications as kigan.[244] More broadly, ritual prayers to the kami are called
norito,[245] while the coins offered are saisen.[246] When at the shrine, individuals offering prayers are not
necessarily praying to a specific kami.[239] A worshipper may not know the name of a kami residing at the
shrine nor how many kami are believed to dwell there.[247] Unlike in certain other religious traditions such as
Christianity and Islam, Shinto shrines do not have weekly services that practitioners are expected to
attend.[248]
People often ask the kami to help offset inauspicious events that may affect them. For instance, in Japanese
culture, the age 33 is seen as being unlucky for women and the age 42 for men, and thus people can ask the
kami to offset any ill-fortune associated with being this age.[255] Certain directions can also be seen as being
inauspicious for certain people at certain times and thus people can approach the kami asking them to offset
this problem if they have to travel in one of these unlucky directions.[255]
Pilgrimage has long been an important facet of Japanese religion,[256] and Shinto features pilgrimages to
shrines, which are known as junrei.[257] A round of pilgrimages, whereby individuals visit a series of shrines
and other sacred sites that are part of an established circuit, is known as a junpai.[257] An individual leading
these pilgrims, is sometimes termed a sendatsu.[206] For many centuries, people have also visited the shrines
for primarily cultural and recreational reasons, as opposed to spiritual ones.[239] Many of the shrines are
recognised as sites of historical importance and some are classified as UNESCO World Heritage Sites.[239]
Shrines such as Shimogamo Jinja and Fushimi Inari Taisha in Kyoto, Meiji Jingū in Tokyo, and Atsuta Jingū
in Nagoya are among Japan's most popular tourist sites.[152] Many shrines have a unique rubber-stamp seal
which visitors can get printed into their sutanpu bukku or stamp book, demonstrating the different shrines they
have visited.[258]
Shinto rituals begin with a process of purification, or harae.[259] Using fresh water or salt water, this is known
as misogi.[130] At shrines, this entails sprinkling this water onto the face and hands, a procedure known as
temizu,[260] using a font known as a temizuya.[261] Another form of purification at the start of a Shinto rite
entails waving a white paper streamer or wand known as the haraigushi.[262] When not in use, the haraigushi
is usually kept in a stand.[260] The priest waves the haraigushi horizontally over a person or object being
purified in a movement known as sa-yu-sa ("left-right-left").[260] Sometimes, instead of a haraigushi, the
purification is carried out with an o-nusa, a branch of evergreen to
which strips of paper have been attached.[260] The waving of the
haraigushi is often followed by an additional act of purification, the
shubatsu, in which the priest sprinkles water, salt, or brine over those
assembled from a wooden box called the en-to-oke or
magemono.[263]
Home Shrines
Many Shinto practitioners also have a kamidana or family shrine in their home.[277] These usually consist of
shelves placed at an elevated position in the living room.[278] The popularity of kamidana increased greatly
during the Meiji era.[279] Kamidana can also be found in workplaces, restaurants, shops, and ocean-going
ships.[280] Some public shrines sell entire kamidana.[281] Along with the kamidana, many Japanese
households also have butsudan, Buddhist altars enshrining the ancestors of the family;[282] ancestral reverence
remains an important aspect of Japanese religious tradition.[118] In the rare instances where Japanese
individuals are given a Shinto funeral rather than a Buddhist one, a tama-ya, mitama-ya, or sorei-sha shrine
may be erected in the home in place of a butsudan. This
will be typically placed below the kamidana and includes
symbols of the resident ancestral spirit, for instance a
mirror or a scroll.[283]
Household Shinto can focus attention on the dōzoku-shin, kami who are perceived to be ancestral to the
dōzoku or extended kinship group.[285] A small shrine for the ancestors of a household are known as
soreisha.[265] Small village shrines containing the tutelary kami of an extended family are known as iwai-
den.[286] In addition to the temple shrines and the household shrines, Shinto also features small wayside
shrines known as hokora.[180] Other open spaces used for the worship of kami are iwasaka, an area
surrounded by sacred rocks.[287]
A form of divination that is popular at Shinto shrines are the omikuji.[295] These are small slips of paper which
are obtained from the shrine (for a donation) and which are then read to reveal a prediction for the future.[296]
Those who receive a bad prediction often then tie the omikuji to a nearby tree or frame set up for the purpose.
This act is seen as rejecting the prediction, a process called sute-mikuji, and thus avoiding the misfortune it
predicted.[297]
The use of amulets are widely sanctioned and popular in Japan.[248]
These may be made of paper, wood, cloth, metal, or plastic.[248]
Ofuda act as amulets to keep off misfortune and also serve as
talismans to bring benefits and good luck.[245] They typically
comprise a tapering piece of wood onto which the name of the shrine
and its enshrined kami are written or printed. The ofuda is then
wrapped inside white paper and tied up with a colored thread.[298]
Ofuda are provided both at Shinto shrines and Buddhist temples.[245]
A frame at a shrine where omikuji are Another type of amulet provided at shrines and temples are the
tied omamori, which are traditionally small, brightly colored drawstring
bags with the name of the shrine written on it.[299] Omamori and
ofuda are sometimes placed within a charm bag known as a kinchaku,
typically worn by small children.[244]
At new year, many shrines sell hamaya (an "evil-destroying arrows"), which people can purchase and keep in
their home over the coming year to bring good luck.[300] A daruma is a round, paper doll of the Indian monk,
Bodhidharma. The recipient makes a wish and paints one eye; when the goal is accomplished, the recipient
paints the other eye. While this is a Buddhist practice, darumas can be found at shrines, as well. These dolls
are very common.[301] Other protective items include dorei, which are earthenware bells that are used to pray
for good fortune. These bells are usually in the shapes of the zodiacal animals.[301] Inuhariko are paper dogs
that are used to induce and to bless good births.[301] Collectively, these talismans through which home to
manipulate events and influence spirits, as well as related mantras and rites for the same purpose, are known as
majinai.[302]
Kagura
Kagura describes the music and dance performed for the kami.[303] Throughout Japanese history, dance has
played an important culture role and in Shinto it is regarded as having the capacity to pacify kami.[304] There
is a mythological tale of how kagura dance came into existence. According to the Kojiki and the Nihon Shoki,
Ame-no-Uzume performed a dance to entice Amaterasu out of the cave in which she had hidden herself.[305]
The word "kagura" is thought to be a contracted form of kami no kura or "seat of the kami" or the "site where
the kami is received."[306]
Music plays a very important role in the kagura performance. Everything from the setup of the instruments to
the most subtle sounds and the arrangement of the music is crucial to encouraging the kami to come down and
dance. The songs are used as magical devices to summon the kami and as prayers for blessings. Rhythm
patterns of five and seven are common, possibly relating to the Shinto belief of the twelve generations of
heavenly and earthly deities. There is also vocal accompaniment called kami uta in which the drummer sings
sacred songs to the kami. Often the vocal accompaniment is overshadowed by the drumming and instruments,
reinforcing that the vocal aspect of the music is more for incantation rather than aesthetics.[310]
In both ancient Japanese collections, the Kojiki and the Nihon Shoki, Ame-no-uzeme's dance is described as
asobi, which in the old Japanese language means a ceremony that is designed to appease the spirits of the
departed, and which was conducted at funeral ceremonies. Therefore, kagura is a rite of tama shizume, of
pacifying the spirits of the departed. In the heian period, this was one of the important rites at the Imperial
Court and had found its fixed place in the tama shizume festival in the eleventh month. At this festival people
sing as accompaniment to the dance: "Depart! Depart! Be cleansed and go! Be purified and leave!"[311] This
rite of purification is also known as chinkon. It was used for securing and strengthening the soul of a dying
person. It was closely related to the ritual of tama furi (shaking the spirit), to call back the departed soul of the
dead or to energize a weakened spirit. Spirit pacification and rejuvenation were usually achieved by songs and
dances, also called asobi. The ritual of chinkon continued to be performed on the emperors of Japan, thought
to be descendants of Amaterasu. It is possible that this ritual is connected with the ritual to revive the sun kami
during the low point of the winter solstice.[312]
Festivals
Spring festivals are called haru-matsuri and often incorporate prayers for a good harvest.[317] They sometimes
involve ta-asobi ceremonies, in which rice is ritually planted.[317] Summer festivals are termed natsu-matsuri
and are usually focused on protecting the crops against pests and other threats.[321] Autumn festivals are
known as aki-matsuri and primarily focus on thanking the kami for the rice or other harvest.[322] The
Niiname-sai, or festival of new rice, is held across many Shinto shrines on 23 November.[323] The Emperor
also conducts a ceremony to mark this festival, at which he presents the first fruits of the harvest to the kami at
midnight.[324] Winter festivals, called fuyu no matsuri often feature on welcoming in the spring, expelling evil,
and calling in good influences for the future.[325] There is little difference between winter festivals and specific
new year festivals.[325]
The season of the new year is called shogatsu.[145] On the last day of the year (31 December), omisoka,
practitioners usually clean their household shrines in preparation for new year's day (1 January), ganjitsu.[326]
Many people visit public shrines to celebrate new year;[327] this "first visit" of the year is known as hatsumōde
or hatsumairi.[328] There, they buy amulets and talismans to bring them good fortune over the coming
year.[329] To celebrate this festival, many Japanese put up rope known as shimenawa on their homes and
places of business.[330] Some also put up kadomatsu ("gateway
pine"), an arrangement of pine branches, plum tree, and bamboo
sticks.[331] Also displayed are kazari, which are smaller and more
colourful; their purpose is to keep away misfortune and attract good
fortune.[123] In many places, new year celebrations incorporate
hadaka matsuri ("naked festivals") in which men dressed only in a
fundoshi loincloth engage in a particular activity, such as fighting over
a specific object or immersing themselves in a river.[332]
Rites of passage
The formal recognition of events is given great importance in Japanese culture.[340] A common ritual, the
hatsumiyamairi, entails a child's first visit to a Shinto shrine.[341] A tradition holds that, if a boy he should be
brought to the shrine on the thirty-second day after birth, and if a girl she should be brought on the thirty-third
day.[342] Historically, the child was commonly brought to the shrine not by the mother, who was considered
impure after birth, but by another female relative; since the late 20th century it has been more common for the
mother to do so.[342] Another rite of passage, the saiten-sai or seijin shiki, is a coming of age ritual marking the
transition to adulthood and occurs when an individual is around twenty.[343] Wedding ceremonies are often
carried out at Shinto shrines.[344] These are called shinzen kekkon ("a wedding before the kami") and were
popularised in the Meiji period; prior to this, weddings were commonly performed in the home.[345]
In Japan, funerals tend to take place at Buddhist temples,[344] with Shinto funerals being rare.[118] Bocking
noted that most Japanese people are "still 'born Shinto' yet 'die Buddhist'."[149] In Shinto thought, contact with
death is seen as imparting impurity (kegare); the period following this contact is known as kibuku and is
associated with various taboos.[346] In cases when dead humans are enshrined as kami, the physical remains of
the dead are not stored at the shrine.[347] Although not common, there have been examples of funerals
conducted through Shinto rites. The earliest examples are known from the mid-17th century; these occurred in
certain areas of Japan and had the support of the local authorities.[348] Following the Meiji Restoration, in
1868 the government recognised specifically Shinto funerals for Shinto priests.[349] Five years later, this was
extended to cover the entire Japanese population.[350] Despite this Meiji promotion of Shinto funerals, the
majority of the population continued to have Buddhist funeral rites.[348] In recent decades, Shinto funerals
have usually been reserved for Shinto priests and for members of certain Shinto sects.[351] After cremation, the
normal funerary process in Japan, the ashes of a priest may be interred near to the shrine, but not inside its
precincts.[112]
Ancestral reverence remains an important part of Japanese religious custom.[118] The invocation of the dead,
and especially the war dead, is known as shokon.[145] Various rites reference this. For instance, at the largely
Buddhist festival of Bon, the souls of the ancestors are believed to visit the living, and are then sent away in a
ritual called shoro nagashi, by which lanterns are inserted into small boats, often made of paper, and placed in
a river to float downstream.[352]
Shinto practitioners believe that the kami can possess a human being
and then speak through them, a process known as kami-gakari.[353]
Several new religious movements drawing upon Shinto, such as
Tenrikyo and Oomoto, were founded by individuals claiming to be
guided by a possessing kami.[354] The takusen is an oracle that is
passed from the kami via the medium.[186]
The itako and ichiko are blind women who train to become spiritual
mediums in the northern Tohoku region of Japan.[355] In the late
An itako at the autumn Inako Taisai
twentieth century, they were present in Japanese urban centers.[355]
festival at Mount Osore, Aomori
Itako train in the role under other itako from childhood, memorialising Prefecture, Japan
sacred texts and prayers, fasting, and undertaking acts of severe
asceticism, through which they are believed to cultivate supernatural
powers.[355] In an initiation ceremony, a kami is believed to possess the young woman, and the two are then
ritually "married". After this, the kami becomes her tutelary spirit and she will henceforth be able to call upon
it, and a range of other spirits, in future. Through contacting these spirits, she is able to convey their messages
to the living.[355] Itako usually carry out their rituals independent of the shrine system.[356] Today, itako are
most commonly associated with Mount Osore in Aomori Prefecture. There, an annual festival is held beside
the Entsuji Buddhist temple, which hangs signs disavowing any connection to the itako.[357] Itako gather there
to channel the dead for thousands of tourists.[358]:31 In contemporary Japan, itako are on the decline. In 2009,
less than 20 remained, all over the age of 40.[359] Contemporary education standards have all but eradicated
the need for specialized training for the blind.[359]
Japanese culture also includes spiritual healers known as ogamiya-san whose work involves invoking both
kami and Buddhas.[139]
History
Early development
Earhart commented that Shinto ultimately "emerged from the beliefs and practices of prehistoric Japan",[360]
although Kitagawa noted that it was questionable whether prehistoric Japanese religions could be accurately
termed "early Shinto".[293] The historian Helen Hardacre noted that it was the Yayoi period of Japanese
prehistory which was the "first to leave artifacts that can reasonably be linked to the later development of
Shinto".[7] Kami were worshipped at various landscape features during this period; at this point, their worship
consisted largely of beseeching and placating them, with little evidence that they were viewed as
compassionate entities.[69] Archaeological evidence suggests that dotaku bronze bells, bronze weapons, and
metal mirrors played an important role in kami-based ritual during the Yayoi period.[69]
In this early period, Japan was not a unified state; by the Kofun period it was divided among Uji (clans), each
with their own tutelary kami, the ujigami.[361] Korean migration during the Kofun period brought
Confucianism and Buddhism to Japan.[362] Buddhism had a particular impact on the kami cults.[361] Migrant
groups and Japanese who increasingly aligned with these foreign influences built Buddhist temples in various
parts of the Japanese islands.[361] Several rival clans who were more hostile to these foreign influences began
adapting the shrines of their kami to more closely resemble the new
Buddhist structures.[361] In the late 5th century, the Yamato leader
Yūryaku declared himself daiō ("great king") and established
hegemony over much of Japan.[363] From the early 6th century CE,
the style of ritual favored by the Yamato began spreading to other
kami shrines around Japan as the Yamato extended their territorial
influence.[364] Buddhism was also growing. According to the Nihon
Shoki, in 587 Emperor Yōmei converted to Buddhism and under his
sponsorship Buddhism spread.[365] From the eighth century, Shinto
and Buddhism were thoroughly intertwined in Japanese society.[162]
Nara period
This period hosted many changes to the country, government, and religion. The capital is moved again to
Heijō-kyō (modern-day Nara), in AD 710 by Empress Genmei due to the death of the Emperor. This practice
was necessary due to the Shinto belief in the impurity of death and the need to avoid this pollution. However,
this practice of moving the capital due to "death impurity" is then abolished by the Taihō Code and rise in
Buddhist influence.[378] The establishment of the imperial city in partnership with Taihō Code is important to
Shinto as the office of the Shinto rites becomes more powerful in assimilating local clan shrines into the
imperial fold. New shrines are built and assimilated each time the city is moved. All of the grand shrines are
regulated under Taihō and are required to account for incomes, priests, and practices due to their national
contributions.[378]
During this time, Buddhism becomes structurally established within Japan by Emperor Shōmu (r. 724–749),
and several large building projects are undertaken. The Emperor lays out plans for the Buddha Dainichi (Great
Sun Buddha), at Tōdai-ji assisted by the Priest Gyogi (or Gyoki) Bosatsu. The priest Gyogi went to Ise
Daijingu Shrine for blessings to build the Buddha Dainichi. They identified the statue of Viarocana with
Amaterasu (the sun kami) as the manifestation of the supreme expression of universality.[378]
The priest Gyogi is known for his belief in assimilation of Shinto Kami and Buddhas. Shinto kami are
commonly being seen by Buddhist clergy as guardians of manifestation, guardians, or pupils of Buddhas and
bodhisattvas.[378] The priest Gyogi conferred boddhisattva precepts on the Emperor in 749 effectively making
the Imperial line the head of state and divine to Shinto while beholden to Buddhism.[379]
With the introduction of Buddhism and its rapid adoption by the court
in the 6th century, it was necessary to explain the apparent differences
between native Japanese beliefs and Buddhist teachings. One
Buddhist explanation saw the kami as supernatural beings still caught
in the cycle of birth and rebirth (reincarnation). The kami are born,
live, die, and are reborn like all other beings in the karmic cycle.
However, the kami played a special role in protecting Buddhism and
allowing its teachings of compassion to flourish.
From the eighth century onward up until the Meiji era, the kami were
incorporated into a Buddhist cosmology in various ways.[380] One Shown here is the syncretism
view is that the kami realised that like all other life-forms, they too between Buddhism and kami worship
were trapped in the cycle of samsara (rebirth) and that to escape this known as shinbutsu-shūgō, once
they had to follow Buddhist teachings.[380] Alternative approaches common in feudal Japan. Foxes
viewed the kami as benevolent entities who protected Buddhism, or sacred to Shinto kami Inari, a torii, a
that the kami were themselves Buddhas, or beings who had achieved Buddhist stone pagoda, and
enlightenment. In this, they could be either hongaku, the pure spirits Buddhist figures are placed together
of the Buddhas, or honji suijaku, transformations of the Buddhas in at Jōgyō-ji.
their attempt to help all sentient beings.[380]
Kokugaku
Buddhism and Shinto coexisted and were amalgamated in the shinbutsu-shūgō and Kūkai's syncretic view
held wide sway up until the end of the Edo period. There was no theological study that could be called
"Shinto" during medieval and early modern Japanese history, and a mixture of Buddhist and popular beliefs
proliferated. At that time, there was a renewed interest in "Japanese studies" (kokugaku), perhaps as a result of
the closed country policy.
In the 18th century, various Japanese scholars, in particular Motoori Norinaga ( 本居 宣⻑ , 1730–1801), tried
to isolate ideas and beliefs that were uniquely Japanese, which included tearing apart the "real" Shinto from
various foreign influences, especially Buddhism. The attempt was largely unsuccessful; however, the attempt
did set the stage for the arrival of State Shinto, following the Meiji Restoration (c. 1868), when Shinto and
Buddhism were separated (shinbutsu bunri).
Breen and Teeuwen characterise the period between 1868 and 1915,
during the Meiji era, as being the "formative years" of modern
Shinto.[8] It is in this period that various scholars have argued that
Shinto was essentially "invented".[8] Fridell argues that scholars call
the period from 1868–1945 the "State Shinto period" because,
"during these decades, Shinto elements came under a great deal of
overt state influence and control as the Japanese government
systematically utilized shrine worship as a major force for mobilizing Chōsen Jingū in Seoul
imperial loyalties on behalf of modern nation-building." [381]
However, the government had already been treating shrines as an
extension of government before Meiji; see for example the Tenpō Reforms. Moreover, according to the scholar
Jason Ānanda Josephson, It is inaccurate to describe shrines as constituting a "state religion" or a "theocracy"
during this period since they had neither organization, nor doctrine, and were uninterested in conversion.[382]
The Meiji Restoration of 1868 was fuelled by a renewal of Confucian ethics and imperial patriotism among
Japan's ruling class.[383] Among these reformers, Buddhism was seen as a corrupting influence that had
undermined what they envisioned as Japan's original purity and greatness.[383] They wanted to place a
renewed emphasis on kami worship as an indigenous form of ritual, an attitude that was also fuelled by
anxieties about Western expansionism and fear that Christianity would take hold in Japan.[383]
1868, all shrine priests were placed under the authority of the new Jingikan, or Council of Kami Affairs.[384]
A project of forcible separating kami worship from Buddhism as implemented, with Buddhist monks, deities,
buildings, and rituals being banned from kami shrines.[383] Buddhist imagery, scriptures, and ritual equipment
were burnt, covered in excrement, or otherwise destroyed.[383] In 1871, a new hierarchy of shrines was
introduced, with imperial and national shrines at the top.[385] Hereditary priesthoods were abolished and a new
state-sanctioned system for appointing priests was introduced.[385] In 1872, the Jingikan was closed and
replaced with the Kyobusho, or Ministry of Edification.[386] This coordinated a campaign whereby
kyodoshoku ("national evangelists") were sent through the country to promote Japan's "Great Teaching,"
which included respect for the kami and obedience to the emperor.[386] This campaign was discontinued in
1884.[386] In 1906, thousands of village shrines were merged so that most small communities had only a single
shrine, where rites in honor of the emperor could be held.[387] Shinto effectively became the state cult, one
promoted with growing zeal in the build-up to the Second World War.[387]
In 1882, the Meiji government designated 13 religious movements that were neither Buddhist nor Christian to
be forms of "Sect Shinto".[35] The number and name of the sects given this formal designation varied.[388] In
the Meiji period, many local traditions died out and were replaced by nationally standardised practices
encouraged from Tokyo.[140]
Although the government sponsorship of shrines declined, Japanese nationalism remained closely linked to the
legends of foundation and emperors, as developed by the kokugaku scholars. In 1890, the Imperial Rescript on
Education was issued, and students were required to ritually recite its oath to "offer yourselves courageously to
the State" as well as to protect the Imperial family. Such processes continued to deepen throughout the early
Shōwa era, coming to an abrupt end in August 1945 when Japan lost the war in the Pacific. On 1 January
1946, Emperor Shōwa issued the Ningen-sengen, in which he quoted the Five Charter Oath of Emperor Meiji
and declared that he was not an akitsumikami (a deity in human form).
Post-war
During the U.S. occupation, a new constitution was drawn up. This
both enshrined freedom of religion in Japan and initiated the
separation of church and state, a measure designed to eradicate "state
Shinto" (kokka shinto).[389] As part of this, the Emperor formally
declared that he was not a kami;[390] any Shinto rituals performed by
the imperial family became their own private affair.[391] This
disestablishment meant that the government subsidies to shrines
ceased, although it also provided shrines with renewed freedom to
organise their own affairs.[390] In 1946 many shrines then formed a
voluntary organisation, the Association of Shinto Shrines (Jinja
Honchō), through which they could coordinate their efforts.[392] In
1956 the association issued a creedal statement, the keishin seikatsu The headquarters of the Association
no kōryō ("general characteristics of a life lived in reverence of the of Shinto Shrines in Shibuya, Tokyo.
kami"), to summarise what they regarded as the principles of Shinto
practice.[184] By the late 1990s around 80% of Japan's Shinto shrines
were part of this association.[393]
In the post-war decades, many Japanese blamed Shinto for encouraging the militaristic policy which had
resulted in defeat and occupation.[390] Conversely, many Shinto practitioners remained nostalgic for the State
Shinto system,[394] and concerns were repeatedly expressed that sectors of Japanese society were conspiring
to restore it.[395] Post-war, various legal debates have occurred over the involvement of public officials in
Shinto.[396] In 1965, for instance, the city of Tsu, Mie Prefecture paid four Shinto priests to purify the site
where the municipal athletic hall was to be built. Critics brought the case to court, claiming it contravened the
constitutional separation of church and state; in 1971 the high court ruled that the city administration's act had
been unconstitutional, although this was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1977.[397] In the post-war
period, Shinto themes were often blended into Japanese new religious movements;[398] of the Sect Shinto
groups, Tenrikyo was probably the most successful in the post-war decades,[394] although in 1970 it
repudiated its Shinto identity.[399]
Shinto has also spread abroad to a limited extent, and a few non-Japanese Shinto priests have been ordained.
A relatively small number of people practice Shinto in America. There are several Shinto shrines in America.
Shrines were also established in Taiwan and Korea during the period of Japanese imperial rule, but following
the war, they were either destroyed or converted into some other use. The Tsubaki Grand Shrine in Suzuka,
Mie Prefecture, was the first to establish a branch abroad: the Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America, initially
located in California and then moved to Granite Falls, Washington.[215] Shinto perspectives also exerted an
influence on popular culture. The film director Hayao Miyazaki of Studio Ghibli for instance acknowledged
Shinto influences on his creation of films such as Spirited Away.[400]
Demographics
Shinto is primarily found in Japan, although the period of the empire it
was introduced to various Japanese colonies and in the present is also
practiced by members of the Japanese diaspora.[28]
Official statistics show Shinto to be Japan's largest religion, with over 80 percent of the country's population
identified as engaging in Shinto activities.[168][405] Conversely, in questionnaires only a small minority of
Japanese describe themselves as "Shintoists."[168] This indicates that a far larger number of people engage in
Shinto activities than cite Shinto as their religious identity.[168] There are no formal rituals to become a
practitioner of "folk Shinto". Thus, "Shinto membership" is often estimated counting only those who do join
organised Shinto sects.[406] Shinto has about 81,000 shrines and about 85,000 priests in the country.[405]
According to surveys carried out in 2006[407] and 2008,[408] less than 40% of the population of Japan
identifies with an organised religion: around 35% are Buddhists, 30% to 40% are members of Shinto sects and
derived religions. In 2008, 26% of the participants reported often visiting Shinto shrines, while only 16.2%
expressed belief in the existence of kami in general.[408]
Outside Japan
Jinja established outside of Japan itself are known as kaigai jinja ("overseas shrines"), a term coined by
Ogasawara Shōzō.[409] These were established both in territories throughout Asia conquered by the Japanese
and in areas across the world where Japanese migrants settled.[409] At the time that the Japanese Empire
collapsed in the 1940s, there were over 600 public shrines, and over 1,000 smaller shrines, within Japan's
conquered territories.[409] Following the collapse of the empire, many of these shrines were disbanded.[409]
Shinto has attracted interest outside of Japan, in part because it lacks the doctrinal focus of major religions
found in other parts of the world.[410] Shinto was introduced to United States largely by interested European
Americans rather than by Japanese migrants.[410] Japanese migrants established several shrines in Brazil.[411]
Study of Shinto
In the early twentieth century, and to a lesser extent in the second half, Shinto was depicted as monolithic and
intensely indigenous by the Japanese State institution and there were various state induced taboos influencing
academic research into Shinto in Japan.[412] Japanese secular academics who questioned the historical claims
made by the Imperial institution for various Shinto historical facts and ceremonies, or who personally refused
to take part in certain Shinto rituals, could lose their jobs and livelihood.[413] During the 20th century, most
academic research on Shinto was conducted by Shinto theologians, often priests.[414]
Following the Second World War, many scholars writing on Shinto
were also priests; they wrote from the perspective of active
proponents. The result of this practice was to depict the actual history
of a dynamic and diverse set of beliefs interacting with knowledge
and religion from mainland China as static and unchanging formed by
the imperial family centuries ago.[413] Some secular scholars accused
these individuals of blurring theology with historical analysis.[415] In
the late 1970s and 1980s the work of a secular historian Kuroda
Toshio attempted to frame the prior held historical views of Shinto not A fox statue guarding the Inari shrine
as a timeless "indigenous" entity, but rather an amalgam of various at Tsurugaoka Hachiman-gū in
local beliefs infused over time with outside influences through waves Kamakura
of Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism. Part of his analysis is that
this obfuscation was a cloak for Japanese ethnic nationalism used by
state institutions especially in the Meiji and post war era to underpin the Japanese national identity.[415] From
the 1980s onward, there was a renewed academic interest in Shinto both in Japan and abroad.[416]
See also
Balinese Hinduism Mongolian Shamanism
Chinese folk religion Raijin
Culture of Japan Ryukyuan religion (Ryukyu Shinto)
Department of Divinities Shide (Shinto)
Dol hareubang (Korean spirit) Shinto in popular culture
Dōsojin Shinto architecture
Gogyo Japanese Five Phases Shinto in Taiwan
Hari-Kuyo Shinto music
History of Japan Suunism
Iwakura (Shinto) – rock formation where a Tengriism
kami is invited to descend Twenty-Two Shrines
Kodama (spirit) Women in Shinto
Korean shamanism Yōsei
List of Japanese deities
Notes
a. 神道, Shintō, Japanese pronunciation: [ɕiꜜntoː]
b. 神の道, Kami no michi, Japanese pronunciation: [káꜜmì no mìtɕí]
References
Citations
1. Bocking 1997, p. viii; Rots 2015, p. 211.
2. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
3. Hardacre 2017, p. 1.
4. Inoue 2003, p. 1.
5. Picken 1994, p. xviii.
6. Smart 1998, p. 135.
7. Hardacre 2017, p. 18.
8. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 7.
9. Bocking 1997, p. 174.
10. Inoue 2003, p. 5.
11. Kuroda 1981, p. 3.
12. Picken 1994, p. xvii; Nelson 1996, p. 26.
13. Picken 1994, p. xxiv; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
14. Breen 2010, p. 69.
15. Picken 1994, pp. xxiv–xxv.
16. Picken 1994, p. xix.
17. Offner 1979, p. 191; Picken 2011, p. 1; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
18. Offner 1979, p. 191.
19. Picken 1994, p. xxx.
20. Picken 2011, p. 48.
21. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
22. Nelson 1996, p. 30.
23. Kitagawa 1987, p. 139; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
24. Inoue 2003, p. 7.
25. Bocking 1997, pp. 173–174.
26. Inoue 2003, p. 10.
27. Picken 1994, p. xxv.
28. Earhart 2004, p. 31.
29. Rots 2015, p. 210.
30. Kuroda 1981, p. 1; Nelson 1996, p. 7; Rots 2015, p. 211.
31. Nelson 1996, p. 7.
32. Kuroda 1981, p. 19.
33. Kuroda 1981, pp. 1–2.
34. Kitagawa 1987, p. xviii.
35. Offner 1979, p. 215.
36. Offner 1979, p. 192; Nelson 1996, p. 7.
37. Offner 1979, p. 192.
38. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 14.
39. Bocking 1997, p. viii.
40. Offner 1979, p. 193; Kitagawa 1987, p. 139; Bocking 1997, p. 173; Nelson 2000, p. 14; Earhart
2004, p. 2; Picken 2011, p. 9.
41. Kuroda 1981, p. 4; Bocking 1997, pp. viii, 173.
42. Picken 1994, p. xxiv; Picken 2011, p. 64.
43. Kitagawa 1987, p. 139; Picken 2011, p. 9.
44. Teeuwen 2002, p. 243.
45. Teeuwen 2002, p. 256.
46. Teeuwen 2002, p. 236; Hardacre 2017, p. 41.
47. Kuroda 1981, pp. 4–5; Teeuwen 2002, p. 237.
48. Kuroda 1981, p. 6; Teeuwen 2002, p. 237; Hardacre 2017, p. 42.
49. Kuroda 1981, p. 7.
50. Kuroda 1981, pp. 9–10.
51. Kuroda 1981, pp. 11, 12.
52. Kuroda 1981, p. 10.
53. Kuroda 1981, pp. 10–11.
54. Hardacre 2017, p. 42.
55. Kuroda 1981, p. 19; Bocking 1997, p. 174.
56. Bocking 1997, p. 70; Hardacre 2017, p. 31.
57. Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 35; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
58. Earhart 2004, p. 2; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
59. Earhart 2004, p. 8.
60. Kitagawa 1987, p. 36.
61. Offner 1979, p. 194; Bocking 1997, p. 84.
62. Nelson 1996, p. 29.
63. Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 35; Hardacre 2017, p. 52.
64. Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 35.
65. Offner 1979, p. 194.
66. Picken 1994, p. xxi; Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 35.
67. Nelson 1996, p. 26.
68. Nelson 1996, p. 7; Picken 2011, p. 40; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
69. Hardacre 2017, p. 19.
70. Bocking 1997, p. 180; Hardacre 2017, p. 1.
71. Bocking 1997, p. 180.
72. Bocking 1997, p. 172.
73. Offner 1979, p. 202; Nelson 1996, p. 144.
74. Offner 1979, p. 202; Earhart 2004, pp. 36–37.
75. Offner 1979, p. 202; Picken 2011, p. 44.
76. Nelson 1996, p. 27; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13.
77. Bocking 1997, p. 164.
78. Bocking 1997, p. 114; Picken 2011, p. 42.
79. Earhart 2004, pp. 7–8.
80. Nelson 1996, p. 33.
81. Bocking 1997, pp. 214-215.
82. Bocking 1996, p. 222.
83. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 13; Hardacre 2017, p. 1.
84. Earhart 2004, p. 10.
85. Bocking 1997, p. 69.
86. Picken 2011, pp. 35–36.
87. Picken 2011, p. 42.
88. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 15.
89. Bocking 1997, p. 13; Picken 2011, p. 57; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 15.
90. Bocking 1997, p. 13; Picken 2011, p. 58.
91. Picken 2011, p. 40; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 15.
92. Bocking 1997, p. 8.
93. Bocking 1997, p. 37.
94. Bocking 1997, p. 200.
95. Offner 1979, p. 195; Kitagawa 1987, p. 142; Earhart 2004, p. 32; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 18.
96. Hardacre 2017, pp. 48–49.
97. Offner 1979, p. 195; Kitagawa 1987, p. 142; Earhart 2004, p. 33.
98. Earhart 2004, pp. 33–34; Cali & Dougill 2013, pp. 18–19.
99. Earhart 2004, p. 33.
00. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 19.
01. Bocking 1997, p. 5; Picken 2011, p. 38; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 19.
02. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 19; Hardacre 2017, p. 48.
03. Kitagawa 1987, p. 143; Cali & Dougill 2013, pp. 19–20; Hardacre 2017, p. 49.
04. Kitagawa 1987, p. 143; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 20; Hardacre 2017, p. 50.
05. Kitagawa 1987, p. 143; Bocking 1997, p. 67; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 20; Hardacre 2017, p. 50.
06. Offner 1979, p. 196; Kitagawa 1987, p. 143; Bocking 1997, p. 67; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 20;
Hardacre 2017, p. 53.
07. Offner 1979, pp. 196–197; Kitagawa 1987, p. 144; Bocking 1997, p. 3; Cali & Dougill 2013,
p. 21; Hardacre 2017, pp. 53-54.
08. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 22; Hardacre 2017, p. 54.
09. Kitagawa 1987, p. 144; Hardacre 2017, p. 57.
10. Bocking 1997, p. 129; Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 34.
11. Picken 2011, p. 36.
12. Picken 2011, p. 71.
13. Doerner 1977, pp. 153–154.
14. Kitagawa 1987, p. 143; Bocking 1997, p. 216.
15. Kitagawa 1987, p. 143.
16. Doerner 1977, p. 153.
17. Kitagawa 1987, p. xii.
18. Picken 2011, p. 39.
19. Doerner 1977, p. 157.
20. Bocking 1997, p. 93; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 20.
21. Nelson 1996, p. 101; Bocking 1997, p. 45; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 21.
22. Picken 2011, p. 45.
23. Bocking 1997, p. 93.
24. Nelson 1996, p. 102.
25. Nelson 1996, p. 38.
26. Nelson 1996, p. 63.
27. Picken 2011, p. 7.
28. Offner 1979, p. 206; Nelson 1996, p. 104.
29. Bocking 1997, p. 58.
30. Bocking 1997, p. 124.
31. Nelson 1996, p. 140.
32. Nelson 1996, p. 141; Bocking 1997, p. 124.
33. Bocking 1997, p. 124; Picken 2011, p. 45.
34. Nelson 1996, p. 141; Earhart 2004, p. 11.
35. Nelson 1996, pp. 141–142; Picken 2011, p. 70.
36. Picken 2011, p. 6.
37. Earhart 2004, p. 11.
38. Bocking 1997, p. 219.
39. Bocking 1997, p. 136.
40. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 12.
41. Picken 1994, p. xxiii.
42. Bocking 1997, p. 115.
43. Bocking 1997, p. 157; Picken 2011, p. 34.
44. Offner 1979, p. 198.
45. Bocking 1997, p. 182.
46. Nelson 1996, p. 198.
47. Kitagawa 1987, p. xvii.
48. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 10.
49. Bocking 1997, p. ix.
50. Nelson 1996, pp. 66–67.
51. Ueda 1979, p. 317; Rots 2015, p. 221.
52. Rots 2015, p. 221.
53. Nelson 2000, p. 12; Picken 2011, pp. 18–19.
54. Rots 2015, pp. 205, 207.
55. Rots 2015, p. 209.
56. Rots 2015, p. 223.
57. Rots 2015, pp. 205–206.
58. Rots 2015, p. 208.
59. Offner 1979, p. 214; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 10.
60. Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 33.
61. Picken 1994, p. xxxii.
62. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 8.
63. Nelson 1996, p. 3.
64. Picken 1994, p. xviii; Bocking 1997, p. 72; Earhart 2004, p. 36; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
65. Picken 2011, p. 21.
66. Earhart 2004, p. 36.
67. Earhart 2004, p. 36; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 1.
68. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 1.
69. Picken 1994, p. xxxi; Picken 2011, p. 29; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 5; Cali & Dougill 2013,
p. 8.
70. Picken 2011, p. 29.
71. Earhart 2004, p. 36; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
72. Bocking 1997, pp. 71, 72.
73. Bocking 1997, p. 220.
74. Nelson 1996, p. 93.
75. Nelson 1996, p. 92; Picken 2011, p. 43; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
76. Bocking 1997, p. 170.
77. Bocking 1997, p. 9.
78. Nelson 1996, p. 92; Bocking 1997, p. 42; Picken 2011, p. 43; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
79. Nelson 1996, p. 92; Bocking 1997, p. 49; Picken 2011, p. 43.
80. Bocking 1997, p. 54.
81. Bocking 1997, p. 34.
82. Bocking 1997, p. 82.
83. Bocking 1997, p. 160.
84. Bocking 1997, p. 94.
85. Bocking 1997, p. 166.
86. Bocking 1997, p. 197.
87. Bocking 1997, p. 169.
88. Offner 1979, p. 201; Bocking 1997, p. 207; Earhart 2004, p. 36; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 7.
89. Bocking 1997, p. 207; Picken 2011, p. 43.
90. Offner 1979, p. 201.
91. Picken 2011, p. 20.
92. Offner 1979, p. 201; Bocking 1997, p. 104.
93. Bocking 1997, p. 104.
94. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 12.
95. Rots 2015, p. 211.
96. Rots 2015, p. 219.
97. Bocking 1997, p. 208.
98. Nelson 1996, p. 71; Bocking 1997, p. 72.
99. Bocking 1997, p. 148.
00. Bocking 1997, pp. 72–73.
01. Nelson 1996, p. 77.
02. Picken 2011, p. 23.
03. Nelson 1996, p. 92.
04. Nelson 1996, p. 93; Bocking 1997, p. 163; Nelson 2000, p. 4.
05. Bocking 1997, p. 73.
06. Bocking 1997, p. 158.
07. Bocking 1997, p. 26.
08. Bocking 1997, p. 26; Picken 2011, p. 44.
09. Bocking 1997, p. 88.
10. Bocking 1997, pp. 168, 171.
11. Ueda 1979, p. 325; Nelson 1996, p. 29.
12. Nelson 1996, p. 29; Bocking 1997, pp. 99, 102.
13. Nelson 1996, p. 42.
14. Picken 2011, pp. 31–32.
15. Picken 2011, p. 32.
16. Nelson 2000, p. 15.
17. Bocking 1997, p. 25.
18. Bocking 1997, p. 7; Picken 2011, p. 44.
19. Bocking 1997, p. 53.
20. Bocking 1997, pp. 58, 146.
21. Bocking 1997, pp. 89–90.
22. Bocking 1997, p. 51.
23. Bocking 1997, p. 162.
24. Offner 1979, p. 212; Nelson 1996, p. 186; Bocking 1997, p. 39; Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 33.
25. Offner 1979, p. 212.
26. Nelson 1996, p. 179.
27. Nelson 1996, p. 123.
28. Nelson 1996, p. 124.
29. Earhart 2004, p. 35.
30. Nelson 1996, p. 43.
31. Nelson 1996, p. 141.
32. Bocking 1997, p. 121.
33. Nelson 1996, p. 47; Bocking 1997, p. 121.
34. Nelson 1996, p. 47.
35. Nelson 1996, pp. 124–125.
36. Nelson 1996, p. 125.
37. Bocking 1997, p. 152.
38. Bocking 1997, p. 42.
39. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 11.
40. Offner 1979, p. 202.
41. Offner 1979, pp. 201–202; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 11.
42. Offner 1979, p. 204; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 3; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 11.
43. Bocking 1997, pp. 43, 90.
44. Bocking 1997, p. 96.
45. Bocking 1997, p. 135.
46. Bocking 1997, p. 149.
47. Offner 1979, p. 202; Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 11.
48. Earhart 2004, p. 12.
49. Bocking 1997, p. 98.
50. Nelson 1996, p. 116.
51. Bocking 1997, p. 3; Picken 2011, p. 36.
52. Nelson 1996, p. 116; Bocking 1997, p. 114.
53. Bocking 1997, p. 108.
54. Nelson 1996, pp. 190–196; Bocking 1997, p. 68.
55. Nelson 1996, p. 183.
56. Kitagawa 1987, pp. xvii–xviii.
57. Bocking 1997, p. 80.
58. Bocking 1997, p. 192.
59. Nelson 1996, p. 39; Bocking 1997, p. 45.
60. Bocking 1997, p. 45.
61. Nelson 1996, p. 91.
62. Nelson 1996, pp. 39, 46; Bocking 1997, p. 45.
63. Bocking 1997, p. 184.
64. Nelson 1996, p. 40.
65. Bocking 1997, p. 187.
66. Cali & Dougill 2013, pp. 13–14.
67. Nelson 1996, p. 64.
68. Bocking 1997, p. 150.
69. Nelson 1996, p. 53.
70. Nelson 1996, pp. 40, 53.
71. Nelson 1996, p. 49.
72. Nelson 1996, p. 49; Bocking 1997, p. 33.
73. Bocking 1997, p. 33.
74. Bocking 1997, p. 22.
75. Nelson 1996, p. 214.
76. Nelson 1996, pp. 214–215.
77. Offner 1979, pp. 200; Nelson 1996, p. 184; Earhart 2004, p. 11.
78. Offner 1979, pp. 200–201.
79. Bocking 1997, p. 85.
80. Bocking 1997, p. 85; Earhart 2004, p. 11.
81. Picken 2011, p. 31.
82. Bocking 1997, p. 13; Earhart 2004, p. 11.
83. Bocking 1997, p. 198.
84. Offner 1979, p. 203.
85. Bocking 1997, p. 24; Picken 2011, pp. 75-76.
86. Bocking 1997, p. 66.
87. Bocking 1997, p. 65.
88. Bocking 1997, pp. 25–26.
89. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 18.
90. Piken 2011, p. 73.
91. Cali & Dougill 2013, p. 17.
92. Picken 2011.
93. Kitagawa 1987, p. 39.
94. Picken 2011, p. 50.
95. Bocking 1997, p. 138; Picken 2011, p. 74.
96. Bocking 1997, pp. 137–138.
97. Bocking 1997, p. 139; Picken 2011, p. 74.
98. Bocking 1997, pp. 135–136.
99. Bocking 1997, p. 138.
00. Bocking 1997, pp. 43–44.
01. Handy Bilingual Reference For Kami and Jinja. Study Group of Shinto Culture. Tokyo:
International Cultural Workshop Inc. 2006. pp. 39–41.
02. Bocking 1997, pp. 114–15.
03. Offner 1979, p. 205; Bocking 1997, p. 81.
04. Kitagawa 1987, p. 23.
05. Kitagawa 1987, p. 23; Bocking 1997, p. 81; Picken 2011, p. 68.
06. Kobayashi, Kazushige; Knecht, Peter, "On the Meaning of Masked Dances in Kagura", Asian
Folklore Studies 40 (1): 1, 1981, p. 3.
07. Bocking 1997, p. 81.
08. Bocking 1997, pp. 81–82.
09. Bocking 1997, pp. 82, 155.
10. Averbuch, Irit, The Gods Come Dancing: A Study of the Japanese Ritual Dance of Yamabushi
Kagura, Ithaca, NY: East Asia Program, Cornell University, 1995, pp. 83–87.
11. Kobayashi, Kazushige; Knecht, Peter, "On the Meaning of Masked Dances in Kagura", Asian
Folklore Studies 40 (1): 1, 1981, pp. 4–5.
12. Averbuch, Irit, The Gods Come Dancing: A Study of the Japanese Ritual Dance of Yamabushi
Kagura, Ithaca, NY: East Asia Program, Cornell University, 1995, p. 12.
13. Boyd & Williams 2005, p. 36; Picken 2011, p. 9.
14. Bocking 1997, p. 117.
15. Picken 1994, p. xxvi.
16. Bocking 1997, pp. 117–118.
17. Bocking 1997, p. 46.
18. Nelson 1996, p. 224; Earhart 2004, p. 222.
19. Bocking 1997, p. 6; Picken 2011, p. 42.
20. Picken 2011, p. 59.
21. Bocking 1997, p. 132.
22. Bocking 1997, p. 2; Picken 2011, p. 35.
23. Nelson 1996, p. 170.
24. Offner 1979, p. 205.
25. Bocking 1997, p. 32.
26. Bocking 1997, p. 139.
27. Offner 1979, p. 205; Nelson 1996, p. 199; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 3.
28. Bocking 1997, p. 47; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 3.
29. Nelson 1996, p. 208.
30. Nelson 1996, p. 206; Bocking 1997, p. 163.
31. Nelson 1996, p. 206; Bocking 1997, p. 81.
32. Bocking 1997, p. 41.
33. Bocking 1997, pp. 39–40.
34. Nelson 1996, p. 140; Bocking 1997, p. 122; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 4.
35. Offner 1979, p. 205; Nelson 1996, p. 133.
36. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 4.
37. Nelson 1996, p. 134.
38. Bocking 1997, p. 43.
39. Nelson 1996, pp. 152–154.
40. Nelson 1996, p. 34.
41. Nelson 1996, p. 161; Bocking 1997, p. 47; Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 3.
42. Bocking 1997, p. 47.
43. Nelson 1996, pp. 212–213; Bocking 1997, p. 156.
44. Earhart 2004, p. 15.
45. Bocking 1997, pp. 178-179.
46. Bocking 1997, p. 95.
47. Picken 2011, p. 19.
48. Kenney 2000, p. 241.
49. Bocking 1997, p. 187; Kenney 2000, p. 240.
50. Kenney 2000, pp. 240–241.
51. Bocking 1997, p. 188.
52. Bocking 1997, p. 183.
53. Bocking 1997, pp. 85–86.
54. Bocking 1997, p. 86.
55. Bocking 1997, p. 63.
56. Bocking 1997, pp. 63–64.
57. Schiffer, Wilhelm (1967). "Necromancers in the Tohoku" (http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/nfile/3186).
Journal: Contemporary Religions in Japan. 8 (2).
58. Schattschneider, Ellen (2003). Immortal wishes : labor and transcendence on a Japanese
sacred mountain. Durham (N. C.): Duke University press. ISBN 978-0-8223-3062-2.
59. Fackler, Martin. "As Japan's Mediums Die, Ancient Tradition Fades" (http://www.countryakitas.c
om/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/world/asia/21japan.html). New York Times. New York
Times. Archived from the original (https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/world/asia/21japan.htm
l?_r=0) on 11 April 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2016.
60. Earhart 2004, p. 2.
61. Hardacre 2017, p. 24.
62. Hardacre 2017, p. 23.
63. Hardacre 2017, p. 25.
64. Hardacre 2017, p. 27.
65. Hardacre 2017, p. 28.
66. Hardacre 2017, p. 17.
67. Hardacre 2017, pp. 17–18.
68. Hardacre 2017, p. 31.
69. Hardacre 2017, p. 33.
70. Hardacre 2017, pp. 33-34.
71. Hardacre 2017, pp. 47–48.
72. Hardacre 2017, p. 64.
73. Hardacre 2017, p. 68.
74. Hardacre 2017, p. 69.
75. Hardacre 2017, pp. 57–59.
76. Hardacre 2017, pp. 64-45.
77. Hardacre 2017, p. 66.
78. Richard Pilgrim, Robert Ellwood (1985). Japanese Religion (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall Inc. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-13-509282-8.
79. Yusen, Kashiwahara (1994). The Shapers Of Japanese Buddhism (1st ed.). Tokyo, Japan:
Kosei Publishing Co. pp. 3–13. ISBN 978-4-333-01630-3.
80. Kuroda 1981, p. 9.
81. Wilbur M. Fridell, "A Fresh Look at State Shintō", Journal of the American Academy of Religion
44.3 (1976), 547–561 in JSTOR (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1462824); quote p. 548
82. Josephson, Jason Ānanda (2012). The Invention of Religion in Japan. University of Chicago
Press. p. 133. ISBN 0226412342.
83. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 8.
84. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, pp. 7-8.
85. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 9.
86. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 10.
87. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 11.
88. Bocking 1997, p. 112.
89. Ueda 1979, p. 304; Kitagawa 1987, p. 171; Bocking 1997, p. 18; Earhart 2004, p. 207.
90. Earhart 2004, p. 207.
91. Ueda 1979, p. 304.
92. Bocking 1997, p. 75; Earhart 2004, pp. 207–208.
93. Bocking 1997, p. 76.
94. Kitagawa 1987, p. 172.
95. Picken 2011, p. 18.
96. Bocking 1997, p. 18.
97. Ueda 1979, p. 307; Breen 2010, pp. 71-72.
98. Nelson 1996, p. 180.
99. Bocking 1997, p. 113.
00. Boyd & Nishimura 2016, p. 3.
01. Earhart 2004, pp. 4, 214.
02. Breen & Teeuwen 2010, p. 2.
03. Earhart 2004, p. 215.
04. Nelson 1996, p. 8.
宗教団体数,教師数及び信者数
05. " " (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/back64/zuhyou/y2322a00.
xls). Statistical Yearbook of Japan. Statistics Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications. 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
06. Williams, 2004. pp. 4–5
07. Dentsu Communication Institute, Japan Research Center: Sixty Countries' Values Databook (ht
tp://www2.ttcn.ne.jp/honkawa/9460.html) (世界 カ国価値観データブック
60 ).
08. "2008 NHK survey of religion in Japan — 宗教的なもの にひかれる⽇本⼈〜 国際⽐較調
ISSP
査(宗教)から〜 " (http://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/summary/research/report/2009_05/090505.pd
f) (PDF). NHK Culture Research Institute.
09. Suga 2010, p. 48.
10. Picken 2011, p. xiv.
11. Suga 2010, pp. 59–60.
12. Hardacre 2017, p. 2.
13. Hardacre 2017, p. 3.
14. Bocking 1997, p. 176.
15. Hardacre 2017, p. 4.
16. Bocking 1997, p. 177.
Sources
Bocking, Brian (1997). A Popular Dictionary of Shinto (revised ed.). Richmond: Curzon. ISBN 978-
0-7007-1051-5.
Boyd, James W.; Williams, Ron G. (2005). "Japanese Shinto: An Interpretation of a Priestly
Perspective". Philosophy East and West. 55 (1): 33–63. doi:10.1353/pew.2004.0039 (http
s://doi.org/10.1353%2Fpew.2004.0039). S2CID 144550475 (https://api.semanticscholar.or
g/CorpusID:144550475).
Boyd, James W.; Nishimura, Tetsuya (2016). "Shinto Perspectives in Miyazaki's Anime Film
Spirited Away" (https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss3/4). Journal of Religion
and Film. 8 (33): 1–14.
Breen, John (2010). " "Conventional Wisdom" and the Politics of Shinto in Postwar Japan". The
Politics and Religion Journal. 4 (1): 68–82.
Breen, John; Teeuwen, Mark (2010). A New History of Shinto. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
ISBN 978-1-4051-5515-1.
Cali, Joseph; Dougill, John (2013). Shinto Shrines: A Guide to the Sacred Sites of Japan's Ancient
Religion. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3713-6.
Doerner, David L. (1977). "Comparative Analysis of Life after Death in Folk Shinto and Christianity"
(https://doi.org/10.18874%2Fjjrs.4.2-3.1977.151-182). Japanese Journal of Religious
Studies. 4 (2): 151–182. doi:10.18874/jjrs.4.2-3.1977.151-182 (https://doi.org/10.18874%2F
jjrs.4.2-3.1977.151-182).
Earhart, H. Byron (2004). Japanese Religion: Unity and Diversity (fourth ed.). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-534-17694-5.
Hardacre, Helen (2017). Shinto: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-
062171-1.
Kenney, Elizabeth (2000). "Shinto Funerals in the Edo Period". Japanese Journal of Religious
Studies. 27 (3/4): 239–271. JSTOR 30233666 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/30233666).
Kitagawa, Joseph M. (1987). On Understanding Japanese Religion (https://archive.org/details/onu
nderstandingj0000kita). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-
691-10229-0.
Kuroda, Toshio (1981). Translated by James C. Dobbins and Suzanne Gay. "Shinto in the History
of Japanese Religion". Journal of Japanese Studies. 7 (1): 1–21. doi:10.2307/132163 (http
s://doi.org/10.2307%2F132163). JSTOR 132163 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/132163).
Inoue, Nobutaka (2003). "Introduction: What is Shinto?". In Nobutaka Inoue (ed.). Shinto: A Short
History. Translated by Mark Teeuwan and John Breen. London and New York: Routledge.
pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-0-415-31913-3.
Nelson, John K. (1996). A Year in the Life of a Shinto Shrine (https://archive.org/details/yearinlifeof
s00nels). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-97500-9.
Nelson, John K. (2000). Enduring Identities: The Guise of Shinto in Contemporary Japan.
Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2259-0.
Offner, Clark B. (1979). "Shinto". In Norman Anderson (ed.). The World's Religions (fourth ed.).
Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press. pp. 191–218.
Picken, Stuart D. B. (1994). Essentials of Shinto: An Analytical Guide to Principal Teachings.
Westport and London: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-26431-3.
Picken, Stuart D. B. (2011). Historical Dictionary of Shinto (second ed.). Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
ISBN 978-0-8108-7172-4.
Rots, Aike P. (2015). "Sacred Forests, Sacred Nation: The Shinto Environmentalist Paradigm and
the Rediscovery of Chinju no Mori" (https://doi.org/10.18874%2Fjjrs.42.2.2015.205-233).
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 42 (2): 205–233. doi:10.18874/jjrs.42.2.2015.205-
233 (https://doi.org/10.18874%2Fjjrs.42.2.2015.205-233).
Smart, Ninian (1998). The World's Religions (https://archive.org/details/worldsreligions00smar_0)
(second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-63748-0.
Suga, Kōji (2010). "A Concept of "Overseas Shinto Shrines": A Pantheistic Attempt by Ogasawara
Shōzō and Its Limitations". Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 37 (1): 47–74.
Teeuwen, Mark (2002). "From Jindō to Shintō. A Concept Takes Shape". Japanese Journal of
Religious Studies. 29 (3–4): 233–263.
Ueda, Kenji (1979). "Contemporary Social Change and Shinto Tradition" (https://doi.org/10.1887
4%2Fjjrs.6.1-2.1979.303-327). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 6 (1–2): 303–327.
doi:10.18874/jjrs.6.1-2.1979.303-327 (https://doi.org/10.18874%2Fjjrs.6.1-2.1979.303-327).
Further reading
Averbuch, Irit (1995). The Gods Come Dancing: A Study of the Japanese Ritual Dance of
Yamabushi Kagura. Ithaca, NY: East Asia Program, Cornell University. ISBN 978-1-885445-67-
4. OCLC 34612865 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/34612865).
Averbuch, Irit (1998). "Shamanic Dance in Japan: The Choreography of Possession in Kagura
Performance". Asian Folklore Studies. 57 (2): 293–329. doi:10.2307/1178756 (https://doi.org/1
0.2307%2F1178756). JSTOR 1178756 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1178756).
Blacker, Dr. Carmen (2003). "Shinto and the Sacred Dimension of Nature" (https://web.archive.
org/web/20071222193053/http://www.shinto.org/isri/eng/dr.carmen-e.html). Shinto.org.
Archived from the original (http://www.shinto.org/isri/eng/dr.carmen-e.html) on 2007-12-22.
Retrieved 2008-01-21.
Bowker, John W (2002). The Cambridge Illustrated History of Religions (https://archive.org/deta
ils/cambridgeillustr00john). New York City: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-
81037-1. OCLC 47297614 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/47297614).
Breen, John; Teeuwen, Mark (2010). A New History of Shinto. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-
5516-8.
Breen, John; Mark Teeuwen, eds. (2000). Shintō in History: Ways of the Kami. Honolulu:
Hawaii University Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2362-7.
Endress, Gerhild (1979). "On the Dramatic Tradition in Kagura: A Study of the Medieval Kehi
Songs as Recorded in the Jotokubon". Asian Folklore Studies. 38 (1): 1–23.
doi:10.2307/1177463 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1177463). JSTOR 1177463 (https://www.jsto
r.org/stable/1177463).
Engler, Steven; Grieve, Gregory P. (2005). Historicizing "Tradition" in the Study of Religion.
Walter de Gruyter, Inc. pp. 92–108. ISBN 978-3-11-018875-2.
Havens, Norman (2006). "Shinto" (https://archive.org/details/nanzanguidetojap0000unse/page/
14). In Paul L. Swanson; Clark Chilson (eds.). Nanzan Guide to Japanese Religions. Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press. pp. 14–37 (https://archive.org/details/nanzanguidetojap0000unse/p
age/14). ISBN 978-0-8248-3002-1. OCLC 60743247 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60743247).
Herbert, Jean (1967). Shinto The Fountainhead of Japan. New York: Stein and Day.
Josephson, Jason Ānanda (2012). The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-41234-4. OCLC 774867768 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/77
4867768).
Kamata, Tōji (2017). Myth and Deity in Japan: The Interplay of Kami and Buddhas. Tokyo:
Japan Publishing Industry Foundation for Culture. ISBN 978-4-916055-84-2.
Kobayashi, Kazushige; Knecht, Peter (1981). "On the Meaning of Masked Dances in Kagura".
Asian Folklore Studies. 40 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/1178138 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F117813
8). JSTOR 1178138 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1178138).
Littleton, C. Scott (2002). Shinto: Origins, Rituals, Festivals, Spirits, Sacred Places. Oxford, NY:
Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-521886-2. OCLC 49664424 (https://www.worldcat.org/
oclc/49664424).
Ueda, Kenji (1999). "The Concept of Kami". In John Ross Carter (ed.). The Religious Heritage
of Japan: Foundations for Cross-Cultural Understanding in a Religiously Plural World.
Portland, OR: Book East. pp. 65–72. ISBN 978-0-9647040-4-6. OCLC 44454607 (https://www.
worldcat.org/oclc/44454607).
Williams, George; Bhar, Ann Marie B.; Marty, Martin E. (2004). Shinto (Religions of the World)
(https://archive.org/details/shinto0000will). Chelsea House. ISBN 978-0-7910-8097-9.
Yamakage, Motohisa (2007). The Essence of Shinto, Japan's Spiritual Heart (https://archive.or
g/details/essenceofshintoj0000yama). Tokyo; New York; London: Kodansha International.
ISBN 978-4-7700-3044-3.
Victoria Bestor, Theodore C. Bestor, Akiko Yamagata. Routledge Handbook of Japanese
Culture and Society. Routledge, 2011. ASIN B004XYN3E4 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004
XYN3E4), ISBN 0415436494
External links
Shinto (https://curlie.org/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Shintoism/) at Curlie
Jinja Honcho – English (http://www.jinjahoncho.or.jp/en/) – The Official Japanese Organization
of 80,000 Shinto Shrines
Kokugakuin University Encyclopedia of Shinto (http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/)
and its Japanese Shinto Jinja Database (http://21coe.kokugakuin.ac.jp/db/jinja/)
Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America (http://www.tsubakishrine.org/) – Tsubaki Grand Shrine of
America: Jinja Shinto in North America, branch of Tsubaki Grand Shrine in Mie Japan
Heian Jingu Shrine (https://web.archive.org/web/20090212140632/http://heianjingu.or.jp/index
_e.html) – Heian Shrine in Kyoto City was built in 1895 in commemoration of the 1100th
anniversary of the move of Japanese Capital from Nara to Kyoto in 794
Meiji Jingu (http://www.meijijingu.or.jp/english/index.html) – Meiji Jingu Shrine in Yoyogi,
Tokyo, commemorates Emperor Taisho and his wife Empress Shoken
Yasukuni Jinja (http://www.yasukuni.or.jp/english/index.html) – A shrine for the honoring of
Japanese War Dead (English)
Shoin-Jinja (https://web.archive.org/web/20051103203043/http://www.shoinjinja.org/english/) –
Shoin Shrine in Tokyo enshrines Yoshida Shoin, a spiritual leader of Meiji Restoration
Yushima Tenjin (http://www.yushimatenjin.or.jp/pc/eng-page/english.htm) – A Tokyo Shrine with
and English site—Shrine for Ameno-tajikaraono-mikoto and Sugawara Michizane
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.