L6 NVQ COMP CCOM Iss3-2
L6 NVQ COMP CCOM Iss3-2
L6 NVQ COMP CCOM Iss3-2
Diploma in Construction
Contracting Operations
Management
Specification
NVQ/Competence-based qualification
First registration November 2014
Issue 4
Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications
Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding
body offering academic and vocational qualifications that are globally recognised and
benchmarked. For further information, please visit our qualifications website at
qualifications.pearson.com. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on
our contact us page at qualifications.pearson.com/contactus
About Pearson
Pearson is the world's leading learning company, with 35,000 employees in more than
70 countries working to help people of all ages to make measurable progress in their lives
through learning. We put the learner at the centre of everything we do, because wherever
learning flourishes, so do people. Find out more about how we can help you and your
learners at qualifications.pearson.com
This specification is Issue 4. Key changes are listed in the summary table on the next page.
We will inform centres of any changes to this issue. The latest issue can be found on the
Pearson website: qualifications.pearson.com
This qualification is offered as part of a Joint Awarding Body Partnership with construction
industry professional bodies; the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), and the Institution
of Civil Engineers (ICE), for whom the NVQs are steps to professional recognition.
www.ciob.org.uk
www.ice.org.uk
References to third party material made in this specification are made in good faith. Pearson
does not endorse, approve or accept responsibility for the content of materials, which may
be subject to change, or any opinions expressed therein. (Material may include textbooks,
journals, magazines and other publications and websites.)
ISBN 9781446957844
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Limited 2017
Summary of Pearson Edexcel Level 6 Diploma in
Construction Contracting Operations Management
specification Issue 4 changes
4 Qualification structures 7
Pearson Edexcel Level 6 Diploma in Construction Contracting
Operations Management 7
5 Programme delivery 17
Learner recruitment, preparation and support 17
Training and assessment delivery 18
Employer engagement 18
8 Assessment 21
Centre Guidance to ensure evidence at the appropriate standard is
obtained 21
Language of assessment 21
Internal assessment 22
Assessment requirements/strategy 23
Types of evidence 23
Appeals 24
Dealing with malpractice 24
This is the formal title of the unit that will appear on the learner’s
certificate. 28
Unit reference number 28
Level 28
Credit value 28
Learning outcomes 29
Assessment criteria 29
Unit 1: Maintain Health, Safety and Welfare Systems in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 30
Unit 2: Plan, Allocate and Monitor Work in Own Area of
Responsibility 41
Unit 3: Chair Meeting and Take Decisions in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 48
Unit 4: Develop and Maintain Working Relationships and Personal
Development in Construction Contracting Operations
Management 55
Unit 5: Plan Measured Surveys in Construction Contracting
Operations Management 69
Unit 6: Establish the Condition of Property in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 83
Unit 7: Identify, Assess and Evaluate Project Requirements in
Construction Contracting Operations Management 96
Unit 8: Develop and Agree Detailed Project Designs in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 106
Unit 9: Specify and Control Production Documents in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 118
Unit 10: Prepare Procurement Schedules and Programmes of Works
in Construction Contracting Operations Management 133
Unit 11: Implement Strategic and Integrated Supply Chain
Management and Sourcing Partnerships in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 141
Unit 12: Obtain Tenders and Appoint Successful Contractors in
Construction Contracting Operations Management 152
Unit 13: Evaluate Enquiries and Submit Tenders in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 166
Unit 14: Evaluate Work Methods and Programme in Construction
Contracting Operations Management 175
Unit 15: Analyse, Monitor and Optimise Materials, Plant and Services
in Construction Contracting Operations Management 185
Unit 16: Control Contract Work in Construction Contracting
Operations Management 194
Unit 17: Optimise and Control Contract Progress and Costs in
Construction Contracting Operations Management 203
Unit 18: Prepare and Agree Contract Accounts and Entitlement in
Construction Contracting Operations Management 212
Within the TQT, Pearson identifies the number of Guided Learning Hours (GLH) that
we estimate a centre delivering the qualification might provide. Guided learning
means activities, such as lessons, tutorials, online instruction, supervised study and
giving feedback on performance, that directly involve tutors and assessors in
teaching, supervising and invigilating learners. Guided learning includes the time
required for learners to complete external assessment under examination or
supervised conditions.
As well as TQT and GLH, qualifications can also have a credit value – equal to one
tenth of TQT, rounded to the nearest whole number.
Centres will need to use the Qualification Number (QN) when they seek public
funding for their learners. As well as a QN, each unit within a qualification has a
unit reference number (URN).
The qualification title, unit titles and QN will appear on each learner’s final
certificate. Centres should tell learners this when recruiting them and registering
them with Pearson. There is more information about certification in our UK
Information Manual, available on our website at: qualifications.pearson.com
Qualification objectives
This qualification is a direct replacement for the Pearson Edexcel Level 6 NVQ
Diploma in Construction Contracting Operations Management (QCF) (500/9535/3),
which has expired.
Pathway 1 – Estimating
The learner will need to meet the requirements outlined in the table below before
the Pearson Edexcel Level 6 Diploma in Construction Contracting Operations
Management – Estimating qualification can be awarded.
Centres are free to offer these qualifications using any mode of delivery (for
example full time, part time, evening only, distance learning) that meets learners’
needs. Learners must be in employment or working with a training provider on a
programme so that they can develop and demonstrate the occupational
competence required.
Whichever mode of delivery is used, centres must make sure that learners have
access to specified resources and to the sector specialists delivering and assessing
the units. Centres must adhere to the Pearson policies that apply to the different
modes of delivery. Our policy on Collaborative arrangements for the delivery of
vocational qualifications can be found on our website at qualifications.pearson.com
There are various approaches to delivering a successful competence-based
qualification. The section below outlines elements of good practice that centres can
adopt in relation to learner recruitment, preparation and support, training and
assessment delivery, and employer engagement.
Good practice in relation to training and assessment delivery includes the following.
● Offering flexible delivery and assessment to meet the needs of the employer
and learner, through the use of a range of approaches, for example virtual
learning environments (VLEs), online lectures, video, printable online resources,
virtual visits, webcams for distance training, e-portfolios.
● Planning opportunities for the development and practising of skills on the job.
On-the-job training presents an excellent opportunity to develop the learner’s
routine expertise, resourcefulness, craftspersonship and business-like attitude.
It is therefore important that there is intentional structuring of practice and
guidance to supplement the learning and development provided through
engagement in everyday work activities. Learners need to have structured time
to learn and practice their skills separate from their everyday work activities.
Teaching and learning methods, such as coaching, mentoring, shadowing,
reflective practice, collaboration and consultation, could be used in this
structured on-the-job learning.
● Integrating the delivery and assessment of Personal, Learning and Thinking
Skills (PLTS) and Employment Rights and Responsibilities (ERR) if the
programme is being delivered as a part of an Apprenticeship. It is important
that learners understand the relevance of these skills in the workplace and are
aware of when and how they will be developing them. Please see Annexe C for
mapping of PLTS to the units in this specification.
● Developing an holistic approach to assessment by matching evidence to
different assessment criteria, learning outcomes and units as appropriate,
thereby reducing the assessment burden on learners and assessors. It is good
practice to draw up an assessment plan that aligns the units with the learning
process and the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and that indicates how and
when the units will be assessed.
● Discussing and agreeing with the learner and employer suitable times, dates
and work areas where assessment will take place. Learners and employers
should be given regular and relevant feedback on performance and progress.
Employer engagement
As part of the approval process, centres must make sure that the resource
requirements below are in place before offering the qualification.
● Centres must have the appropriate physical resources to support delivery and
assessment of the qualification. For example, a workplace in line with industry
standards, or a Realistic Working Environment (RWE), where permitted, as
specified in the assessment requirements/strategy for the sector, equipment,
IT, learning materials, teaching rooms.
● Where RWE is permitted, it must offer the same conditions as the normal, day-
to-day working environment, with a similar range of demands, pressures and
requirements for cost-effective working.
● Centres must meet any specific human and physical resource requirements
outlined in the assessment requirements/strategy in Annexe A. Staff assessing
learners must meet the occupational competence requirements within the
overarching assessment requirements/strategy for the sector.
● There must be systems in place to ensure continuing professional development
for staff delivering the qualification.
● Centres must have appropriate health and safety policies, procedures and
practices in place for the delivery and assessment of the qualification.
● Centres must deliver the qualification in accordance with current equality
legislation. For further details on Pearson’s commitment to the Equality Act
2010, please see Section 7, Access and recruitment. For full details on the
Equality Act 2010, please go to www.legislation.gov.uk.
Equality and fairness are central to our work. Pearson’s Equality Policy requires all
learners to have equal opportunity to access our qualifications and assessments
and that our qualifications are awarded in a way that is fair to every learner.
We are committed to making sure that:
● learners with a protected characteristic (as defined by the Equality Act 2010)
are not, when they are undertaking one of our qualifications, disadvantaged in
comparison to learners who do not share that characteristic
● all learners achieve the recognition they deserve from undertaking a
qualification and that this achievement can be compared fairly to the
achievement of their peers.
For learners with disabilities and specific needs, the assessment of their potential to
achieve the qualification must identify, where appropriate, the support that will be
made available to them during delivery and assessment of the qualification. Please
see the information regarding reasonable adjustments and special consideration in
Section 8, Assessment.
To achieve a pass for the full qualification, the learner must achieve all the units
required in the stated qualification structure.
At level 6, this qualification is only suitable for learners working with significant
levels of responsibility. They may be budget holders, in their respective disciplines,
e.g. as site managers, planners, estimators, buyers - with responsibility and broad
autonomy for managing projects and people, and dealing with complex problems
that arise.
Where knowledge is required, discussions, questioning or other knowledge evidence
should show conceptual understanding that enables the student to devise and
sustain arguments and/or to solve problems, using ideas and techniques, some of
which may be at the forefront of a discipline and from a range of sources
For competence it is expected that the evidence presented is in line with the level
of responsibility they currently exercise, for example learners are likely to be
operating in a range of varied and specific contexts using non routine and/ or
creative activities exercising judgement in planning, selecting or presenting
information which contribute to the management of significant construction
projects.
They may show that they are utilising specialized skills across one or more
disciplines, transferring and applying knowledge to solve complex problems and
exercising judgement across a range of situations, determining, refining and
evaluating methodology and their results, accepting accountability for achieving
group and personal outcomes. They are likely to be involved in leading processes
that result in substantial change, taking responsibility for the work and roles of
others.
Language of assessment
The units in this qualification are assessed through an internally and externally
quality assured Portfolio of Evidence made up of evidence gathered during the
course of the learner’s work.
Each unit has specified learning outcomes and assessment criteria. To pass each
unit the learner must:
● achieve all the specified learning outcomes
● satisfy all the assessment criteria by providing sufficient and valid evidence for
each criterion
● prove that the evidence is their own.
The learner must have an assessment record that identifies the assessment criteria
that have been met. The assessment record should be cross-referenced to the
evidence provided. The assessment record should include details of the type of
evidence and the date of assessment. Suitable centre documentation should be
used to form an assessment record.
It is important that the evidence provided to meet the assessment criteria for the
unit and learning outcomes is:
Valid relevant to the standards for which competence is claimed
Authentic produced by the learner
Current sufficiently recent to create confidence that the same skill,
understanding or knowledge persist at the time of the claim
Reliable indicates that the learner can consistently perform at this level
Sufficient fully meets the requirements of the standards.
Learners can provide evidence of occupational competence from:
● current practice – where evidence is generated from a current job role
● a programme of development – where evidence comes from assessment
opportunities built into a learning programme. The evidence provided must
meet the requirements of the Sector Skills Council’s assessment
requirements/strategy
● the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) – where a learner can demonstrate
that they can meet a unit’s assessment criteria through knowledge,
understanding or skills they already possess without undertaking a course of
development. They must submit sufficient, reliable, authentic and valid evidence
for assessment. Evidence submitted that is based on RPL should give the centre
confidence that the same level of skill, understanding and knowledge exists at
the time of claim as existed at the time the evidence was produced. RPL is
acceptable for accrediting a unit, several units, or a whole qualification
Further guidance is available in our policy document Recognition of Prior
Learning Policy and Process, available on our website at:
qualifications.pearson.com
● a combination of these.
Types of evidence
To achieve a unit, the learner must gather evidence that shows that they have
met the required standard specified in the assessment criteria, Pearson’s quality
assurance arrangements (please see Section 10, Quality assurance of centres) and
the requirements of the assessment requirements/strategy given in Annexe A.
In line with the assessment requirements/strategy, evidence for internally assessed
units can take a variety of forms as indicated below:
● direct observation of the learner’s performance by their assessor (O)
● outcomes from oral or written questioning (Q&A)
● products of the learner’s work (P)
● personal statements and/or reflective accounts (RA)
● outcomes from simulation (S)
● professional discussion (PD)
● authentic statements/witness testimony (WT)
● expert witness testimony (EWT)
● evidence of Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL).
Learners can use the abbreviations in their portfolios for cross-referencing
purposes.
Learners can also use one piece of evidence to prove their knowledge, skills and
understanding across different assessment criteria and/or across different units.
It is not necessary for learners to have each assessment criterion assessed
separately. They should be encouraged to reference evidence to the relevant
assessment criteria. However, the evidence provided for each unit must be clearly
reference the unit being assessed. Evidence must be available to the assessor,
the internal verifier and the Pearson standards verifier.
Any specific evidence requirements for a unit are given in the Assessment section
of the unit.
Further guidance on the requirements for centre quality assurance and internal
verification processes is available on our website qualifications.pearson.com. Please
see Section 12, Further information and useful publications for details.
Centres must have a policy for dealing with appeals from learners. Appeals may
relate to incorrect assessment decisions or unfairly conducted assessment. The first
step in such a policy is a consideration of the evidence by a Lead Internal Verifier or
other member of the programme team. The assessment plan should allow time for
potential appeals after learners have been given assessment decisions.
Centres must document all learners’ appeals and their resolutions. Further
information on the appeals process can be found in the document Enquiries and
appeals about Pearson vocational qualifications policy, which is available on our
website at: qualifications.pearson.com
Centres must have a policy for dealing with malpractice by learners. This policy
must follow the Pearson Assessment Malpractice Policy, which is available on our
website at: qualifications.pearson.com. Centres must report malpractice to Pearson,
particularly if any units have been subject to quality assurance or certification.
Centres are able to make adjustments to assessments to take account of the needs
of individual learners in line with the guidance given in the document Pearson
Supplementary Guidance for Reasonable Adjustment and Special Consideration in
Vocational Internally Assessed Units. In most instances, adjustments can be
achieved by following the guidance; for example allowing the use of assistive
technology or adjusting the format of the evidence. We can advise you if you are
uncertain as to whether an adjustment is fair and reasonable. Any reasonable
adjustment must reflect the normal learning or working practice of a learner in a
centre or working within the occupational area.
Further information on access arrangements can be found in the Joint Council for
Qualifications (JCQ) document Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and
Special Consideration for General and Vocational qualifications.
Both documents are on our website at: qualifications.pearson.com
Centres must operate special consideration in line with the guidance given in the
document Pearson Supplementary Guidance for Reasonable Adjustment and Special
Consideration in Vocational Internally Assessed Units. Special consideration may
not be applicable in instances where:
● assessment requires the demonstration of practical competence
● criteria have to be met fully
● units/qualifications confer licence to practice.
Centres cannot apply their own special consideration; applications for special
consideration must be made to Pearson and can be made only on a case-by-case
basis. A separate application must be made for each learner and certification claims
must not be made until the outcome of the application has been received.
Further information on special consideration can be found in the Joint Council for
Qualifications (JCQ) document Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and
Special Consideration for General and Vocational qualifications.
Both of the documents mentioned above are on our website at:
qualifications.pearson.com
Centre recognition
Centres that have not previously offered Pearson vocational qualifications need to
apply for and be granted centre recognition and approval as part of the process for
approval to offer individual qualifications.
Existing centres will be given ‘automatic approval’ for a new qualification if they are
already approved for a qualification that is being replaced by a new qualification
and the conditions for automatic approval are met.
Guidance on seeking approval to deliver Pearson vocational qualifications is
available at qualifications.pearson.com.
Approvals agreement
All centres are required to enter into an approval agreement, which is a formal
commitment by the head or principal of a centre, to meet all the requirements of
the specification and any associated codes, conditions or regulations. Pearson will
act to protect the integrity of the awarding of qualifications. If centres do not
comply with the agreement, this could result in the suspension of certification or
withdrawal of approval.
Unit title
This is the formal title of the unit that will appear on the learner’s certificate.
Level
All units and qualifications have a level assigned to them. The level assigned is
informed by the level descriptors defined by Ofqual, the qualifications regulator.
Credit value
All units have a credit value. When a learner achieves a unit, they gain the specified
number of credits. The minimum credit value is 1 and credits can be awarded in
whole numbers only.
Unit summary
This summarises the purpose of the unit and the learning the unit offers.
Assessment criteria
Descriptions of the requirements a learner is expected to meet to demonstrate that
a learning outcome has been achieved.
Unit summary
This unit is about health, safety and welfare policy and how it is implemented in an
organisation. The knowledge gained applies to all workplaces whether a site,
workshop, office or elsewhere.
You will need to promote a culture of health, safety and welfare and ensure that
induction has taken place. You will need to check systems regularly, record/report
information, identify possible improvements, make recommendations and
implement systems.
You will need to identify hazards, obtain and review information relating to them
and assess risks. You will need to apply the protection and prevention principles,
identify any residual risks and pass on information relating to them.
You will need to identify the necessary resources and promote and maintain risk
reduction.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Records of inducting and checking the competence of people in the workplace,
including promoting a culture of health, safety and welfare, and recommending
opportunities for improvements (1.1, 1.2) [1.1, 1.2, 1.3].
2. Records of implementing systems that include the meeting of statutory
requirements for the identification and reduction of hazards, the reporting of
accidents and emergencies and preventing recurrences, any special workplace
conditions and non-complying situations (1.3, 1.4, 1.5) [1.1, 1.3, 1.4].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item that is considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Identified hazards arising from work products, processes and equipment,
identified residual risks, applied principles of prevention and protection (ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 5
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Records of the appropriate health and safety plan which include details of the
risks, and risk reduction methods as planned (5.1, 5.2) [ALL].
2. Records of implemented and maintained risk reduction methods (5.3, 5.4)
[5.2, 5.3].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about allocating work to team members, agreeing objectives with them,
assessing their performance and providing feedback.
You will gain an understanding of how to allocate work to team members, taking
full account of their abilities and recommendations, and ensure that they have
sufficient information and understand their responsibilities. You will gain an
understanding of how to ensure their continuing understanding and agreement of
priorities, and inform them of changes.
You will gain an understanding of how to work with team members to develop their
own objectives and work plans, ensuring that these are consistent with their
abilities, are sufficiently detailed, meet organisational objectives and are realistic
and achievable. You will gain an understanding of how to ensure that team
members understand the plans and are committed to them, and to offer advice
and guidance as necessary and update plans as required.
You will gain an understanding of how to ensure that the team members
understand monitoring and assessment processes and, in conjunction with team
members, carry out meaningful assessments. Take account of their personal
circumstances and organisational requirements.
You will gain an understanding of how to provide team members with feedback that
is clear and constructive, is sensitive to their needs and maintains confidentiality.
You will gain an understanding of how to give them the opportunity to respond and
make recommendations regarding improvement.
Learning outcome 1
1. Team members:
● people for whom you have line responsibility
● people for whom you have functional responsibility.
2. Objectives and work plans:
● short term
● medium term
● long term.
3. Organisational constraints:
● organisational objectives
● organisational policies
● resources.
Learning outcome 2
1. Allocate work in the contexts of:
● normal working
● emergencies.
2. Information:
● spoken
● written
● graphical.
3. Relevant people:
● team members
● colleagues working at the same level as yourself
● higher-level managers or sponsors
● customers
● suppliers.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 2
Product evidence
1. You must also show evidence that you reach agreement with at least two types
of relevant person (ALL).
2. You must show evidence that you make allocations covering both contexts (ALL).
3. You must show evidence that you provide at least two types of information
(ALL).
4. You must also convince your assessor that you have the necessary knowledge,
understanding and skills to be able to perform competently in respect of all types of
information and relevant people (ALL).
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
1. You must also show evidence that you take account of all types of organisational
constraint (ALL).
2. You must show evidence that you use at least one type of monitor and
assessment (ALL).
3. You must show evidence that you use both types of information (ALL).
4. You must show evidence that your assessments have at least two types of
purpose (ALL).
5. You must also convince your assessor that you have the necessary knowledge,
understanding and skills to be able to perform competently in respect of all types of
purpose, monitoring and assessment (ALL).
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about chairing meetings and analysing information, making decisions
based on the conclusions from the analysis.
You will gain an understanding of how to circulate appropriate information before
the meeting and ensure that those attending the meeting agree the meeting
objectives. You will gain the ability to allocate time for discussion and keep within
it, ensure that contributions are useful, clearly summarise them at appropriate
times, confirm decisions and recommendations and seek feedback to improve
future meetings.
You will gain the ability to use suitable methods to select and analyse information
based on identified objectives, and then develop clear conclusions. You will need to
present your results and record the work that led to the decisions.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
1. You must also show evidence of leading both types of meeting (1.1, 1.2, 1.4,
1.6, 1.7, 1.10) [1.2].
2. You must prove that you chair meetings to the national standard of competence
(ALL) [ALL].
3. You must show evidence of leading meetings with all types of objective (1.1, 1.2,
1.7) [1.1].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
1. You must also show evidence that you take at least one type of decision (3.1,
3.2, 3.4) [3.3].
2 You must also show evidence that you use both types of information (3.2, 3.4)
[3.2].
3. You must show evidence that you carry out both types of analysis (3.3, 3.6, 3.7)
[3.1].
Unit summary
This unit is about developing, maintaining and enhancing the trust and support of
colleagues, those to whom you report and people who benefit from your work. It is
also about personal development.
You will gain the ability to develop and maintain effective relationships, and offer
timely, relevant information and helpful, sensitive advice. You will gain an
understanding of how to present clear, timely proposals that are appropriately
detailed and acknowledge objections and resolve conflicts sensitively.
You will review own performance, both by self and with line manager, and identify
personal development needs and form them into a development plan. You will gain
an understanding of the need to undertake development activities, record your
progress and re-review your performance.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Records of personal development aims and objectives that include sources of
support and guidance and selected benchmarks of competence and reviews and
updating (3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.8).
2. Profiles of present competence identified against benchmarks of competence
(3.4) [3.4].
3. Development plans which include identified development needs (3.4, 3.5) [3.5].
4. Records of developed progress achievement and evidence of competence
identified against benchmarks of competence (3.6, 3.7) [3.4, 3.6].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about identifying what outputs are required from a survey, choosing
appropriate survey methods and selecting people to carry out the work.
You will need to identify the data needed required from the survey. You must also
analyse and assess existing information and investigate any access problems. You
will also need to choose survey methods and commission people and organisations
to carry out the survey.
You will need to assess any constraints that may affect the planning of the survey,
and obtain permissions from owners of the sites and legal authorities. You must
estimate the costs of the survey, plan and schedule the survey and identify and
implement quality assurance and safety standards.
You will need to identify the factors for investigation, selecting any critical aspects
of the site and surrounding area. You must also summarise priorities and costs in
an investigation brief, and contact people and organisations affected by the
investigation.
You will need to choose methods and techniques for the investigation. You should
identify, collect, and collate the investigation data and analyse and evaluate it. You
will also need to identify and record the opportunities and constraints and assess
previous solutions to similar problems. You must present the findings and important
factors, and assemble any supporting data that is not included in the report.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of a preliminary investigation which identifies the data requirements
and an assessment of existing information and needs (1.1, 1.2, 1.3) [ALL].
2. Records of survey methods chosen (1.4) [1.2].
3. Records of commissioned surveys (1.5) [1.1, 1.2].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Plan(s) and schedule(s) for survey(s); assessed constraints; expert advice;
permissions; cost estimates; identified quality assurance and safety standards
(ALL) [ALL].
2. Method statement(s), programme(s) and budget(s) for survey(s) (3.5) [3.2].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 7
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Evaluation(s) of investigation data (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) [7.1, 7.2, 7.3].
2. Summary(ies) of problems provided to experts (7.4) [7.3, 7.4].
3. Findings from investigations which include: opportunities and constraints for
project development options; previous solutions; factors; supporting data (7.5, 7.6,
7.7, 7.8, 7.9) [7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5].
Process evidence:
1. Presentation(s) of the evaluation report (7.7) [7.3, 7.5].
Unit summary
This unit is about assessing the condition of property and recommending a
condition survey process.
You will gain the ability to select and evaluate relevant information methods and
techniques for the condition survey process. You will also recommend a condition
survey process and present it to the client. You will then assess the opinions of
other people included in the recommendation and agree and confirm the
instructions for the condition survey before the work starts.
You will gain the ability to evaluate data to identify the purpose of the inspection.
You must also check and confirm that people affected by condition inspection have
given their permission. You will then examine actual and potential causes of failure
and identify parts of the property that do not conform to statutory requirements.
You will gain the ability to assemble and collate information on the condition
survey, and select evaluation methods and techniques appropriate to the type of
property. You will then select evidence for the assessment of the property’s
condition, analyse evidence and information, and identify causes of failure and
deterioration.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Evaluation(s) of available and additional data (3.1, 3.4) [3.1].
2. Record(s) of inspection(s) which include equipment, resources and advice
obtained, permissions, observations and measurements, agreed formats and
conventions (3.1, 3.2, 3.3) [3.2, 3.3, 3.4].
3. Record(s) of further investigation(s) to identify the cause of inconsistencies and
actual and potential causes of failure and deterioration (3.5, 3.6) [3.1, 3.2].
4. Record(s) of parts of the property that do not conform to statutory requirements
(3.7) [3.3, 3.4].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 5
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Condition survey which includes evaluations of collated information use
appropriate methods and techniques, analysed evidence, identified causes of failure
and deterioration, specified level of condition, recommended remedial work,
qualifications and explanations (ALL) [ALL].
2. Record(s) of responses to client’s questions (5.8) [5.2].
3. Internal record(s) (5.9) [5.1].
Unit summary
This unit is about the procurement and use of resources. You will gain the ability to
identify and agree goals and priorities with the project stakeholders. You will also
identify the function and performance requirements for the project. You will need to
clarify, summarise and present the project requirements and stakeholder
preferences, challenge any preferences that are not realistic and decide valid
options.
You will gain the ability to identify where resources will be needed and how to
obtain them. You will then need to analyse the factors that will influence the
procurement and use of resources. You will also check that resources have been
estimated, and that opportunities and constraints have been evaluated and
presented to decision makers. You will also produce a report on the procurement
and use of resources.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Process evidence
1. Presentation(s) of the summary(ies) of requirements and preferences (1.4) [1.2,
1.6].
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Report(s) on the procurement and use of resources which include: areas of
development where resources will be needed; investigations to quantify the
resources; costs programmes and statements of purpose; influencing factors;
potential opportunities and constraints; impact; checks of estimated resources;
calculations; amendments to reflect feedback (ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence
1. Presentation(s) of evaluation report(s) (3.5) [3.5].
4.6 Examine how to assess the impact which potential opportunities and
constraints might have on the practicability and efficiency of the
development process
4.7 Explain how to check the resources that will be needed have been
estimated
4.8 Explain how to summarise potential opportunities and constraints
4.9 Explain how to evaluate how resource needs, potential opportunities
and constraints will affect both the financing and the programming of
the project
4.10 Explain how to present the calculations and evaluation to decision
makers, note their advice and amend the evaluation to reflect the
feedback received
4.11 Explain how to produce a report on the procurement and use of
resources
Unit summary
This unit is about choosing methods for developing detailed designs. It is also about
selecting, investigating and analysing the construction and installation criteria and
selecting products and design solutions to meet the requirements of the brief.
You will need to select and decide the importance of the construction and
installation requirements contained in the brief. You will then investigate and
analyse the construction and installation criteria and select products and processes
that meet them. You should then assess existing design solutions; choose solutions
and evaluate them against the requirements of the project brief.
You will need to identify and analyse factors that will influence the detailed design
solutions, and agree and apply criteria for selecting design solutions. You will
evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions; analyse and test design solutions
against relevant factors; and record data from calculations, investigations and
analyses, and then select preferred designs and present them to stakeholders. You
will recommend, present and justify the benefits of the preferred design solution to
project stakeholders. You will need to confirm the costs and implementation time
for the design solution.
You will need to reach agreement with stakeholders on the detailed design solution.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Records of identified parts of the overall project which require a detailed design
including a chosen format for presenting the detailed design information (1.1, 1.2,
1.3) [1.1, 1.2, 1.3].
2. Record(s) of chosen methods for developing detailed designs and codes of
practice (1.4) [1.5].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Plan(s) for investigations to select construction and installation requirements and
criteria and potential opportunities and constraints (3.1, 3.2, 3.3) [3.1, 3.2].
2. Record(s) of investigations and analyses of construction and installation criteria
which are significant to the overall design (3.2, 3.3) [3.2].
3. Record(s) of selected products (3.4) [3.2, 3.3, 3.4].
4. Assessment(s) of existing design solutions and evaluations of chosen solutions
(3.5, 3.6) [3.1, 3.2].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 7
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Information provided to project stakeholders (7.1) [7.1].
2. Records of presentation(s) and justification(s) of recommended design solutions
(7.2, 7.3, 7.4) [7.1, 7.2].
3. Agreement(s) to move to the next stage of the project (7.5) [7.1].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about developing a document production programme. It is also about
preparing a specification document consistent with the current design; the
identification of discrepancies and making recommendations for changes to the
brief; producing progress reports; and issuing documents in line with project
requirements.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Specification(s) that includes: purpose; consistency checks; collated sections;
identified source information; technical clauses (ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 5
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of information that has been obtained, checked and assessed (5.1,
5.2, 5.3) [5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4].
2. Record(s) of collated and checked documents (5.4) [5.2, 5.6].
3. Record(s) of advice given to people who are producing documents and referrals
of outstanding queries (5.5, 5.6) [5.1, 5.2, 5.3].
4. Recommendation(s) for changes to the brief, design, specification and contract
based on discrepancies that have been identified (5.7) [5.1, 5.2].
Unit summary
This unit is about producing a detailed schedule and procurement programme.
You will need to produce a schedule of works that contains the project needs and
range of services needed. You will need to estimate work content and duration, and
plan the schedule. You will need to draft and present the schedule of works to
stakeholders.
You will need to develop a detailed procurement programme and identify any
conflicting requirements and agree modifications. You will also integrate the
procurement programme with the requirements of the overall programme, monitor
the programme and identify modifications that would offer cost and time benefits.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item that is considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Schedule of works which include project needs and the range of services, work
content, time duration, calculated allowances for contingencies, corrected
conflicting requirements and agreed amendments (ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence
1. Presentation(s) of schedule of works (1.6, 1.7) [1.4].
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Procurement programme(s) (3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4) [ALL].
2. Record(s) of the monitor of the procurement programme(s) (3.5) [3.1].
Process evidence: not applicable.
This unit must be assessed in a work environment, in accordance with:
● the Additional Requirements for Qualifications using the title NVQ in QCF
● the ConstructionSkills Consolidated Assessment Strategy for Construction and
the Built Environment.
Assessors for this unit must have verifiable, current industry experience and a
sufficient depth of relevant occupational expertise and knowledge, and must use a
combination of assessment methods as defined in the Consolidated Assessment
Strategy.
Workplace evidence of skills cannot be simulated.
Unit summary
This unit is about selecting criteria to evaluate the benefits of strategic sourcing,
specifying and agreeing how the supply chain and management systems will be
aligned and monitoring the performance of the supply chain.
You will need to select criteria to evaluate the effect of strategic sourcing on
competitiveness and the benefits of changing to new suppliers. You will also
recommend changes and negotiate and agree recommendations with decision
makers and suppliers.
You will need to specify and agree with the supply chain how the management
systems will be aligned, and identify and agree with stakeholders any changes
required. You will then develop and implement trials, assessing results and making
modifications prior to implementation.
You will need to review the terms of contract to assess benefits to the supply chain,
and then monitor the performance of the supply chain. You should then inform the
supply chain about variations in performance and advising them about changes
needed.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Evaluation(s) of the effect of strategic sourcing, including the benefits of change
(1.1, 1.2, 1.3) [1.1, 1.2].
2. Record(s) of recommendations which have been negotiated (1.4, 1.5) [1.1, 1.2].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Specification(s) for the alignment of supply chain management systems (3.1,
3.2) [3.1, 3.2].
2. Record(s) of trials, including modifications made (3.3) [3.2].
3. Record(s) of checks made to the aligned management systems (3.4) [3.2].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about shortlisting and selecting appropriate tenderers. It is also about
reviewing and amending tender documents and ensuring that addendums are
issued.
You will need to identify suitable bills of quantities, evaluate options against
relevant criteria and select options for bills of quantities. You will then forecast the
prime cost, provisional sums and contingencies, prepare a bill of preliminaries and
check final drafts.
You will need to select an appropriate tender, and review tender documents to
ensure that they are issued and cover the scope of work. You will also investigate
any errors reported by tenderers, amend tender documents and ensure that
addendums are reissued.
You will need to acknowledge and evaluate tenders against the criteria and modify
and repeat tendering processes if necessary, choosing the best tenderers to appoint
formally and notifying unsuccessful tenderers. You will also negotiate and agree any
variations, adjustments and corrections with tenderer(s) subject to contract.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of pre-qualification tender enquiries sent to potential tenderers (1.1,
1.2, 1.3) [1.1, 1.2, 1.3].
2. Evaluation(s) of potential tenderers (1.4, 1.5) [1.1, 1.3].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Bill(s) that include: evaluated and selected options; forecasts of prime cost,
provisional sums and contingencies; bill of preliminaries, checks and approvals
(ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 5
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Tender document(s) (5.1, 5.2, 5.3) [5.1, 5.2].
2. Record(s) of tender documents reviewed and issued including (5.2, 5.3, 5.4)
[ALL].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about evaluating the organisation’s resources to meet tender
requirements and the submission of tenders.
You will need to evaluate the tender documents against agreed criteria and assess
the organisation’s resources to meet the tender requirements. You will then identify
and resolve points of concern and contractual and legal issues with the tender,
investigate the tender documents within budgets and tender time limits, and draw
objective conclusions on whether to make a bid.
You will need to identify and evaluate the risks and opportunities involved in the
submission of a successful tender. You will then modify costs to take into account
any external factors and recommend a profit margin and payment schedule. You
will also need to check that the tender is complete and accurate, and then present
and support the tender to maximise its acceptability. You will need to collate and
submit tender information in accordance with procurement requirements.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Tender submission(s) (ALL) [ALL].
Simulations are not considered to be acceptable for producing evidence for this
element.
Process evidence
1. Presentation(s) and support of tender(s) which include evaluations of risks and
opportunities, specified alternatives, profit margin, payment schedule (3.1, 3.2,
3.4, 3.6) [3.2, 3.3, 3.6].
Unit summary
This unit is about assessing project data and selecting methods that meet technical
project criteria. It is also about analysing the sequential programming of activities,
confirming alterations and developing a monitoring system for the works
programme.
You will need to assess project data and obtain more information where required,
and then identify, evaluate and select methods which meet technical and project
criteria and propose them to decision makers.
You will also need to analyse and quantify the selected methods for their activity
content and review method statements to ensure they are accurate and acceptable
to the people involved. You will analyse the sequential programming of activities
against external factors and resources to meet project requirements. You will then
need to ensure that programmes and schedules of activities are consistent with the
complexities of the project. You will need to confirm any alterations made to the
works programme and develop a monitoring system for it.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items which are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Evaluation(s) of possible work methods which include assessments of project
data, information from alternative services, identified work methods, technical and
project criteria (1.1, 1.2) [ALL].
2. Record(s) of proposed work methods (1.3) [1.3].
3. Analyse the method statement(s) (1.4, 1.5) [1.3, 1.6].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Analysis of sequential programming of activities against project requirements,
external factors and necessary resources (3.1) [3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4].
2. Programme(s) and schedule(s) of planned activities (3.2) [ALL].
Unit summary
This unit is about analysing design information and operational plans. It is also
about evaluating supplier performance and providing resources to help them meet
supply project requirements.
You will need to analyse design information, operational plans, user feedback and
quantities, and then confirm supply requirements.
You will also need to identify the opportunities for economising on usage, cost and
the environmental impact of supplies. You will then confirm and monitor purchase
plans to ensure that supply requirements and changing circumstances are met.
You will need to evaluate supplier performance, and identify, record and pass on
information to suppliers regarding any issues in respect of supply requirements.
You will also identify, discuss and agree changes with suppliers which will improve
performance, advise suppliers and provide resources to help them meet supply and
project requirements.
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of evaluation(s) of supplier performance which include identified issues
with supply requirements and identified changes passed on to suppliers (3.1, 3.2,
3.3) [3.1, 3.2].
2. Record(s) of supplier development programmes, advice and resources provided
(3.3, 3.4, 3.5) [3.1, 3.2].
Process evidence
1. Meeting(s) with suppliers (3.5) [3.1].
Unit summary
This unit is about controlling work activities, ensuring that they comply with quality
standards and legal and statutory requirements.
You will need to research quality standards, implement systems and check for
conformity, implementing corrective action where there is non-conformity.
You will need to identify legal and statutory requirements, implement systems and
identify non-compliance, implementing corrective action where there is non-
compliance.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of researched quality standards and specified responsibilities (1.1, 1.2)
[1.1, 1.2].
2. Record(s) of systems for inspection and control which include checks, work
failing requirements and corrective action (1.3, 1.4, 1.5) [1.1, 1.3, 1.4].
Learning outcome 3
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following item(s) that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Record(s) of implemented monitor systems which include legal and statutory
requirements identified from collected information, noncomplying situations,
investigations and corrective action, identified and referred new legal and statutory
requirements (3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5) [ALL].
2. Record(s) of briefing(s) provided to the workforce (3.2) [3.1].
3. Record(s) of statutory returns which have been completed (3.6) [3.1].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about developing systems to monitor and record progress, and briefing
decision makers about progress. It is also about managing and implementing
contract cost control systems and implementing corrective action.
You will need to develop systems to monitor and record progress, and review
resources to accommodate changing circumstances in order to optimise resources.
You will also need to confirm and investigate any deviations to implement
corrective action and recommend options that assist the contract progress. You will
also brief decision makers about progress, resources and action that needs taking.
You will then identify improvements and recommend them to decision makers.
You will need to manage and implement contract cost control systems, review and
summarise cost data, identify variations and trends, and identify and quantify
opportunities for cost savings. You will then investigate variations, and agree and
implement corrective action.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Progress monitor and record system(s) including record(s) (1.1) [1.1, 1.2].
2. Record(s) of resources reviewed which accommodate changes (1.2) [1.3, 1.4].
3. Record(s) of briefings and recommendations passed to decision makers which
include options likely to optimise cost and time, changes, resource needs,
suggested decisions and improvements from feedback (1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6) [1.3, 1.4,
1.5, 1.6, 1.7].
Process evidence: not applicable.
Unit summary
This unit is about valuing work in progress, preparing and submitting accounts,
assessing the basis of claims and progressing valid claims. You will need to value
work in progress, price and reference quantities used in valuations and accounts,
value variations and agree non-standard rates.
You will also need to identify the liability for the cost of re-work and additional
work. You will need to prepare and submit valuations, accounts and clarify any
areas of disagreement. You must also record documents, back-up information and
calculations for audit and reference.
You will need to assess the basis of claims for the recovery of loss and expense
against the contract seek expert opinion where appropriate and progress valid
claims. You will also calculate claims, analyse opposing grounds for the claims, and
negotiate and agree amendments with the people involved. You will then record
documents and back-up information for audit and reference purposes.
Taken as a whole, the evidence must show that the learner consistently meets all
the assessment criteria, across the ranges for the element.
Performance evidence
There must be workplace evidence against each assessment criterion. Where the
workplace evidence does not cover a whole range, knowledge evidence must be
provided to cover the remaining items of range for each relevant assessment
criterion.
Learning outcome 1
Product evidence
The learner must produce documentary evidence from the workplace covering the
following items that are considered to be common and key to demonstrating
competence.
1. Valuation(s), and account(s), which include the value of work in progress, values
of variations, liability for the cost of re-work and additional work and estimates
(1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4) [ALL].
2. Back-up information and calculations (1.5, 1.6) [1.1].
Process evidence: not applicable.
We have a dedicated Account Support team, across the UK, to give you more
personalised support and advice. To contact your Account Specialist:
Email: wblcustomerservices@pearson.com
Telephone: 0844 576 0045
If you are new to Pearson and would like to become an approved centre, please
contact us by:
Email: wbl@pearson.com
Telephone: 0844 576 0045
This is the Assessment Strategy for ConstructionSkills, the Sector Skills Council
(SSC) for construction and the built environment. The strategy itself contains a
number of appendices, which are also included.
Consolidated Assessment Strategy for Construction and the Built
Environment – Craft, Supervisory, Technical, Managerial and Professional
Introduction
This assessment strategy provides principles and guidance to awarding
organisations so the assessment of units and qualifications with NVQ in the
Qualifications and Credit Framework title and SVQs is valid, effective and
consistent, and has credibility across the Construction and Built Environment
sector. This is a consolidated ConstructionSkills Assessment Strategy covering
construction and the built environment – craft, supervisory, technical, managerial
and professional NVQ and SVQ units and qualifications. This assessment strategy is
one of the strands of the ConstructionSkills’ Construction Qualification Strategy.
These principles are in addition to the requirements that awarding organisations
must meet for the delivery of NVQ and SVQ units and qualifications as required by
the qualification regulators’ documentation.
This consolidated assessment strategy provides the overarching principles as
systems may vary from one awarding organisation to another. Awarding
organisations must consistently put these principles into practice.
Appendix A provides guidance to help awarding organisations incorporate relevant
parts of these principle requirements in their documentation.
Appendix B provides a list of sub annexes relevant to specific NVQ or SVQ
qualifications and units; these sub appendices contain additional information for
awarding organisations where National Working Groups or Awarding Body Fora
have identified the need for specific clarification. Clarification may be about the
terminology of the content of the unit (ref. section 2.1), or specific occupational
expertise requirements for assessors and verifiers (ref. section 4).
Awarding organisations must make this Strategy and the relevant annexes available
to assessors, verifiers and candidates.
Principles
1. External quality control of assessment
1.1 Awarding organisations must use risk management for external quality
control of assessment. They must evaluate all external verification reports
and other data relating to assessment centres. Awarding organisations must
address any risks relating to quality control, considering the sector
assessment strategy requirements for:
● workplace evidence
● the use of simulation
● the occupational competence of assessors and verifiers..
Supplementary guidance
In order to meet contractual and regulative requirements, many sectors of industry
require lift planners and supervisors to possess certification from recognised
industry approved bodies. The awarding body should ideally encourage all
assessors to hold appropriate registration cards or certificates to support industry
initiatives for a qualified workforce.
Where lifting experience was gained within the armed forces, applicants for
assessor status should ideally gain external work experience within industry, or be
able to demonstrate knowledge of relevant industry working practices outside the
armed forces.
Supplementary guidance
In order to meet contractual and regulative requirements, many sectors of industry
require operators of plant and equipment to possess certification from recognised
industry approved bodies. The awarding organisation should ideally encourage all
assessors to hold appropriate registration cards or certificates to support industry
initiatives for a qualified workforce. Where plant-operating experience was gained
within the armed forces, applicants for assessor status should ideally gain external
work experience within industry, or be able to demonstrate knowledge of relevant
industry working practices outside the armed forces.
Introduction