Wolfhart Pannenberg On The Person and Wo

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/330970549

Wolfhart Pannenberg on the Person and Work of Christ

Research · December 2016


DOI: 10.1177/004057368404000420

CITATION READS
1 399

1 author:

Rachel Lawrence
Fuller Theological Seminary
4 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Rachel Lawrence on 08 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Lawrence 1

Rachel Lawrence
God and Christ in Theological Reflection
December 1, 2016
Word Count: 806

Wolfhart Pannenberg on the Person and Work of Christ

Wolfhart Pannenberg, a Lutheran systematic theologian, addresses the

issue of Christology versus soteriology. Claiming the two cannot be detached;

his claim is that Jesus’ divinity is predicated upon the restorative implications of

his earthly ministry to us as humans. Simply, it is what Jesus can do for us that

drive the most human interest in his life. In referencing Melanchthon,

Pannenberg furthers the argument that our Christian identity rests in our works,

which would seem to reinforce James’ assertion in James 2:17, while speaking of

faith in action, “In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by

action, is dead.” The case here is a blatant lack of usefulness for faith without

movement. Purely stated, there is no tangible benefit in words to a person who

is hungry, unclothed, or lost. Faith is the calm undercurrent of our daily life as a

Christian, so it is no great leap to expect our actions to reflect this.

Similar to James 2, Galatians 2:20 urges the reader to exhume

themselves from the picture. It is not by our own doing that a person would be

aided in any way, but by the work of the Father who is in you. I found this

portion, although basic and obvious to most, to be one of the most insightful.

Service does not solely come from our thoughts and hearts, but in how our

actions extend to reflect them. For example, one could have a “servant’s heart”

but seek credit for their works instead of properly attributing them to Christ.

Christ’s primary commandment was to love one another, which highlights a

centrifugal aspect of our humanity within our ministry to others. A person in

need is much less likely to receive the word of God if their most basic needs are

left unmet. Jesus was kind before all else. The incarnational thrust of his
Lawrence 2

ministry was that of an intermediary, similar to the role of a chaplain. When

Jesus would seek the suffering, he did not enter through the doors of a

synagogue or church, but out into God’s world.

Herbert McCabe speak to the observance of suffering in The Involvement

of God, “Our only way of being present to another’s suffering is by being

affected by it, because we are outside the other person.” 1 The awareness of the

Creator to our suffering is modeled for us through Jesus’ death and

resurrection. Our salvation comes from the Father’s love and compassion for us,

for which the Son is the greatest example.

A key piece that Pannenberg addresses within this excerpt is the

dangerous side of interpreting Christology through soteriology, which is the

intent focus on Jesus’ ministry and post-resurrection effects while spending

little time meditating on him as a person. Because humans desire a designated

route to salvation, their desires become projected on the figure of Jesus Christ.

Soteriology simply causes us to press into the ministry of Jesus and ask

questions of how it relates to us. Pannenberg urges self-awareness in this,

warning against Christology being constructed out of a person’s own

soteriological interests.

Rosemary Ruether reminds us that Jesus’ humanity was highlighted in

his role as the incarnated Messiah. This fulfilled the messianic hope, which

Christology has altered over time; “There are historical origins of Christology in

Jesus’ messianic proclamation, and behind Jesus’ self-understanding lies a long

history of Jewish messianic hope.”2 Isaiah 53 solidifies this messianic prophecy

by highlighting his humanity first. Since Christ serves as the manifestation of

the Father’s love, Christology must serve to demonstrate the extent to which

1 McCabe, H. (1985) ‘The Involvement of God’, New Blackfriars, 66 (785), pp. 464–476.


2 Ruether, R.R. (1984) ‘Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology’, Theology Today, 40
(4). doi: 10.1177/004057368404000420.
Lawrence 3

Jesus’ ministry sustains the recognition that he is God revealed. As Psalm 58:3

observes, we are estranged from the womb. Jesus reconciles this by bringing

peace, joy, and purpose to those who follow him.

To Pannenberg, Christology must remain primary in significance, with

queries and soteriology being second. If not, he claims, authentic faith has no

foundation. To me, his assertion is logically sound. In our own relationships, one

must at least be acquainted with a person before drawing conclusions or

placing expectations upon their role. Paul claimed that one could not fully know

the living and present Lord simply through experience.3 Therefore, do we follow

Jesus simply for his promise to us? To what extent do our own desires create an

expectation of Jesus that is unrealistic? We must first ask who Jesus was before

we will ever be able to claim who he is for us today.

3 1 Corinthians 1:1-11:13, NIV

View publication stats

You might also like