Teaching English Grammar: Mg. Evelyn Guillén Chávez
Teaching English Grammar: Mg. Evelyn Guillén Chávez
Teaching English Grammar: Mg. Evelyn Guillén Chávez
GRAMMAR
Mg. Evelyn Guillén Chávez
CHAPTER 1
WHAT IS GRAMMAR?
WHAT IS GRAMMAR?
There are two definitions of grammar according
to the Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical
Terms:
• The systematic study and description of a
language.
• A set of rules and examples dealing with the
syntax and word structures of a language,
usually intended as an aid to the learning of
that language.
IMPORTANT IDEAS
• 1. Grammar is broad.
• 2. Grammar has no clear boundaries.
• 3. The KS3 Framework for English is based on grammar
• 4. Grammar is technical.
• 5. Grammar is only a part of 'knowledge about
language'.
• 6. Grammar provides tools for expressing meanings.
• 7. Every kind of English has a grammar.
• 9. English grammar is relevant to other languages.
• 10. Pupils should be taught the principles of sentence
grammar and whole-text cohesion and use this
knowledge in their writing.
Grammar is broad
Grammar is not just syntax. It includes all of the
following:
• Syntax, i.e. sentence structure, where we
distinguish subjects and objects, subordinate and
main clauses, and so on.
• Morphology, i.e. word structure, where we
recognise roots, suffixes, inflected words, and so
on.
• Semantics, i.e. meaning - the things, people,
events and so on that we refer to when talking.
Grammar has no clear boundaries
It is meant to include any of the following:
• Vocabulary and 'word families'.
• Sound patterns in words and the phoneme-
grapheme correspondences of phonics.
• Intonation in speech and its effects on
meaning.
The KS3 Framework for English is
based on grammar
The KS3 Framework assumes a conceptual
structure based on grammar. It follows the
Primary Framework in dividing all the teaching
objectives into three 'levels':
• word level
• sentence level
• text level
Grammar is technical
• However we define grammar, it must include
the linguistic structures found in sentences
and inside words; so pupils must learn to
identify and talk about some of these
patterns. In short, they must learn about
grammatical analysis and the standard
terminology associated with it.
Grammar is only a part of
'knowledge about language'
• Language changes through time, varies from
place to place and is learned by our students.
• They should also be taught:
– that language changes;
– the sources and causes of linguistic change;
– how meanings are affected by choice of
vocabulary and structure;
– to apply their knowledge of language variety.
Grammar provides tools for
expressing meanings.
• English grammar consists of a vast collection
of patterns - ways of using and modifying
words - each of which is dedicated to
achieving some meaning or effect. For
example:
"adjective + common noun" (e.g. tall man) -
the adjective modifies the meaning of the
common noun even when we say (an
interesting man).
Every kind of English has a
grammar.
• Traditionally, grammar was associated with
standard English.
• In fact, every dialect has a grammar, in the
sense of a set of conventions which its
speakers follow, and which sometimes
distinguish insiders from outsiders.
English grammar is relevant to
other languages
• English grammar shows many similarities to
other grammars; for example, the word
classes (noun, verb, and so on) of English are
very similar to the classes found in most other
languages - not surprisingly, perhaps, since we
inherited them from grammarians of Latin,
who in turn had inherited them from Greek.
Pupils should be taught the principles of
sentence grammar and whole-text cohesion
and use this knowledge in their writing.
Grammar in a Communicative
Approach
• Even when functional communication could
take place without it, it is appropriate control
of the grammar that makes the forms of the
communication socially acceptable.
• Grammar enables speakers to talk about
things that are not present in the actual
situation where communication takes place.
In other words: it enables communication to
be decontextualised and to serve our human
need to look beyond the here-and-now.
• Grammar enables speakers to convey
messages that are more subtle and abstract
than would otherwise be possible. It thus
enables language to reflect the complexity of
our human thought processes.
HOW IS GRAMMAR INTERNALISED?
• Research suggest that the ways for
internalising grammar fall into two main
categories. They correspond to whether
language learning is conceived mainly as
learning a skill or mainly as a process of
natural development.
• It should be stressed that these two ways are
not mutually exclusive but may go on
simultaneously.
1. Language learning = learning a
skill
• This kind of learning is the most familiar in school
settings.
• Sets of language items or language for expressing
important meanings are presented to the learners so
that their form and meaning become clear.
• The learners then practise them so that they can use
them automatically, first in controlled practice
situations and later in free language use.
• Throughout this process, language choices are
associated with the meanings that they express, so that
they can later serve the needs of communication.
2. Language learning = a process of
natural development
• In naturalistic learning situations (first or second language) there is
no teacher or course-writer to isolate elements of the language or
organise systematic practice.
• Language develops in the context of natural language use. Provided
that learners are exposed to language they can understand and are
motivated to use it as a medium of communication, they follow
their own spontaneous course of development.
• In natural situations the learners are not normally conscious of
being engaged in a process of language learning. This is because
their focus is not on language itself but on the meanings that are
being communicated.
• Also, the system which learners internalise is not one which has
been pre-analysed and presented by a teacher or course-writer but
one which they themselves create by making their own sense of the
language around them.
HOW CAN WE HELP LEARNERS TO
INTERNALISE GRAMMAR?
• In the classroom we need to provide learners
with opportunities to:
(a) internalise the grammatical system of the
language and
(b) relate this grammatical system to the
meanings it conveys in communication.
As a first step towards organising our classroom
methods so that learners have these
opportunities, we should classify the various
activities for learning grammar into four main
categories:
• pre-communicative language practice
• communicative language practice
• structured communication
• authentic communication
Pre-communicative language
practice
• The most familiar way of doing this is to focus on some kind of
situation (e.g. a picture, a text, the classroom or an area of common
knowledge) and use this as a basis for question-and-answer practice or
description.
How many children are there in the picture?
There are four.
How many books are there on the table?
There are six.(etc.)
• The questions may be asked initially by the teacher but it is important
that they are asked also by the learners, who need experience in
initiating exchanges as well as simply responding.
• This relationship between language and its meanings is often
reinforced by simulating a situation that could occur outside the
classroom, such as that of a stranger asking directions in the street.
Communicative language practice
• This kind of practice adds a further dimension to the kind just
described: the language now expresses meanings that
communicate new information to other people.
• The basic principle is that there is now an “information gap” and
the learners are given the task of sharing information in order to
overcome this gap.
• An example was given above of learners talking about a picture
(how many children, how many books, etc.). It was assumed that
all learners could see the same picture. By using two or more
pictures, which are similar but contain differences of detail, we can
give learners the opportunity to use the same language in simple
communication tasks:
• These activities, (a) involve the students in practising predictable
language, which may only recently have been taught to them, but
(b) students are using this language to communicate new meanings,
including (to a limited extent) meanings which are their own. These
two features are carried further in the next category of activity.
Structured communication
• In “communicative language practice”, the teacher exercises
control of the activity at the level of the specific language
elements to be used.
• In what is here called “structured communication”, control
moves up to a higher level of language use.
• Learners are able now to use whatever language they wish in
order to express the meanings which arise during
communication. However, the situation itself has been
carefully structured so that the meanings which arise are to a
large extent predictable and can be expressed with language
which the learners have (perhaps only recently) been taught.
• The learners can thus practise using the language system for
communication, but in contexts which shelter them from the
unexpected demands which arise in authentic language use.