PDF Tobacco Fields
PDF Tobacco Fields
PDF Tobacco Fields
By JAMES JOHNSON
Horticulturist, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, and Agent, Division
of Tobacco and Plant Nutrition, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States
Department of Agriculture
INTRODUCTION
After curing, cigar-leaf types of tobacco in particular are allowed to
undergo one or more fairly definite periods of fermentation or *^ sweat-
ing." This process is characterized chiefly by an exchange of gases,
the generation of heat, and a modification of the flavor and aroma of
the leaf. The aging process in tobacco is not in all cases clearly dis-
tinguishable from fermentation, except that the rate of activity in the
latter is more rapid and results in an appreciable liberation and
accumulation of heat and gases. Although the subject of fermentation
has received considerable attention in the past no satisfactory technic
for measuring improvement in quality has been devised, and estimates
of the progress of fermentation are dependent largely upon the opinion
of those experienced in judging tobaccos.
As there is little exact knowledge concerning the nature of the pro-
cess of fermentation, comprehensive investigations from several
different angles will be necessary to establish the facts. The present
investigations, in which the Dewar-flask method was used, are pri-
marily concerned with the possible relationship between micro-
organisms and the changes involved in the fermentation of cigar-leaf
types of tobacco.
EARLIER STUDIES
The chemical changes occurring in tobacco during fermentation
have been given particular attention by several investigators, but
need not be reviewed here. It should be recalled, however, that tobacco
fermentation is generally believed to be an oxidation process, and the
close relation of air to the results secured has been generally recognized.
Analyses show significant decreases in nitrogen compounds, including
nicotine, and other organic substances, accounting for a loss of solid
matter sometimes exceeding 5 percent, during fermentation. The
total loss of weight, including that of free water, may be considerably
higher during the process. On the other hand there is a marked libera-
tion of ammonia and carbon dioxide gases as a consequence of this
activity. The improvement of the aroma, flavor, burn, and other
qualities is to be regarded as of major importance even though not
chemically determinable. Separating the essential and desirable
changes from incidental changes constitutes one of the chief difficulties
of the chemical aspects of the problem.
The previous investigations which are of most interest in relation to
the results secured in the present investigations are those dealing with
the possible relationship of enzymes and micro-organisms to the
fermentation process. There have been certain claims (17) ^ and
' Received for publication Mar, 12, 1934; issued August 1934.
' Reference is made by number (italic) to Literature Cited, p. 159.
there is some evidence for the contention that, given the proper con-
ditions, fermentative changes may occur in the absence of any enzymic
or microbial activity, but this theory has not received much support.
The problem seems rather to involve the relative importance of the
enzymic and the microbial activities during normal fermentation,
even though these may be regarded only as agencies speeding up the
rate of oxidation and other chemical changes.
As early as 1858 an analogy between tobacco fermentation and
alcoholic fermentation was implied by Koller (10), who added yeast
with the purpose of increasing the rate of tobacco fermentation.
Later, tobacco fermentation was compared with that of silage (4)y
^^brown'' hay (Í), manures (19), etc. The bacterial theory of tobacco
fermentation was most definitely brought forward in 1891 by Suchs-
land (21), who isolated bacteria from sweating tobacco, prepared pure
cultures, and inoculated these back into tobacco. His claim that the
flavor and odor of a specific type of tobacco could be developed in
another type through the use of bacterial cultures has not, however,
been substantiated. Miciol (15), Dávalos (3), Vernhout (22),
Behrens (1), Koning (11), Jörgensen (9), and others soon afterward
isolated organisms from tobacco and in general supported Suchsland's
hypothesis. These workers showed that a variety of organisms were
present, in what were considered large numbers, i.e., as high as
112,500 bacteria and 12,500 fungus spores on 100 cm^ of freshly
fermented leaf.
Suchsland's bacterial theory soon fell into disrepute under a
vigorous though not convincing attack by Loew (12) in 1899. Loew
not only claimed that bacteria were not present in sufficient numbers to
influence fermentation, but that sufficient moisture was not normally
present for their development, and that even if sufficient moisture
were present, bacteria do not find tobacco a congenial medium for
growth.
An even stronger argument against the bacterial hypothesis, how-
ever, was the enzymic theory of tobacco fermentation developed by
Loew and treated in further detail in two succeeding papers (IS, 14)-
This theory ascribes tobacco fermentation to oxidizing enzymes nor-
mally present in all living material, as oxidase, peroxidase, and cata-
lase, the latter being present in dried, cured, and fermented tobacco,
even after several years. The chief role in fermentation was first
ascribed to peroxidase, an enzyme readily identified by its reaction
with tincture of guaiacum in the presence of hydrogen peroxide.
Loew's theory has since been supported mainly by Boeckhout and Ott
de Vries (2) and Jensen (5), but very little new evidence to support or
controvert the enzyme theory has appeared in the literature. Jensen
(^) in 1915 used the Dewar-flask method of study and concluded that
fermentation of leaf tobacco cannot be inhibited through the addition
of chemicals detrimental to micro-organisms. The data presented are
not clear on this point, however, and the variability of the tempera-
tures in the incubator used was such as to render the data of doubtful
value. On the other hand, Jensen suggests the existence of two types
of fermentation, namely, one which proceeds at a moisture content of
20 percent or below and another which requires a higher moisture
content. Recent investigations in Russia, discussed in considerable
detail by Smirnov (20), evidently are in general agreement with
Jensen's conclusions.
July 15, 1934 Studies on the Fermentation oj Tobacco 139
It is evident from the literature that the determination of the
nature of tobacco fermentation is complicated by the problem of what
constitutes true fermentation and by the variation in the practical
requirements of different types of tobacco.
Studies of a related nature have been conducted by many investiga-
tors on the spontaneous generation of heat in hay, straw, silage, ma-
nures, etc. The purely
chemical, enzymic, and
microbial explanations
have all had stanch
supporters, but it is in-
teresting to note that
recent investigations
support the microbial
theory {16,18), at least
under temperature
and moisture condi-
lions imder which or-
ganisms will iriultiply,
and even discount the
cooperation of en-
zymes {16).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
At first the present
studies were con-
ducted with the ordi-
nary narrow-mouth 1-
quart thermos bottles.
Later, wide-moutli
flasks were secured
which were easier to
fill and permitted of
handling the tobacco
under fairly satisfac-
tory aseptic and pure-
culture conditions
when desired. This
was accomplished by
first placing the tobac-
co in moisture-proof
cellophane containers,
sterilizing it with heat, riGURE 1.—A simple method for preparinR tobacco .samples for fer-
mentation studies with pure cultures. The steriliz.ed tobacco in
and inoculating it with the cellophane roll (A) may be inoculated at any desired points by
mserting the syringe (B) through the cellophane before the roil is
water suspensions of placed in the wide-mouth Dewar flask (C).
cultures of organisms
by means of a Luer syringe inserted through the cellophane at one oi-
more points. The cellophane containers were at first made the desired
shape and size before being filled with tobacco ; inoculations were then
made by injections at a large number of points (fig. 1).
However, more even distribution of inoculum could be secured by
preparing larger sealed cellophane bags in which the tobacco was held
140 Journal uj Agricultural Research Vol. 4«, no. 2
loosely and into which the inoculum was injected with a syringe and
mixed with the tobacco by turning and agitating it. The tobacco
was then pressed into one end of the bag, which was rolled into form
to fit the wide-mouth Dewar flask (fig. 2).
It was found that the tobacco could be adequately sterilized in these
containers without apparent physical injury to the leaf or any appre-
ciable change in moisture content by placing the roll or bag in a sealed
copper container which was placed in an ordinary steamer. Forty-
five minutes of steaming, during which the tobacco reached a tem-
perature of 80° C, was sufficient to prevent subsequent thermogenesis,
and plating out showed that no organisms were present. In practice.
FKJURE 2.—The eellophane-bag (A, B, C) method permits of a uniform application of inoculum under
aseptic conditions; the tobacco in the cellophane bag is sterilized in a copper, rubber-tube-sealed container
(Ö), without undergoing any change in percentage of moisture.
FiüUKE 3.—One of the constant-temperature incubators and the thermos bottles used in the earlier
experiments.
^
y ^^OE ACCO
y
\
/
^ ■^--
I
^^NCUB/VTOR
^^^f^
^^**»*^ ^^ — ».
- "--. /
0 1234567 89 10
DAYS
FIGURE 4.—Thermogenic behavior of tobacco in a thermos bottle held for 10 days at an incubator tempera-
ture of between 30° and 31° C.
water extract, and the odor, as well as on tests for peroxidase with
tincture of guaiacum and hydrogen peroxide. The entire lot of
tobacco was again weighed and then placed in an oven for determina-
tion of dry weight.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
In the present investigation about 350 separate fermentation trials
were made in Dewar flasks. The presentation of all the data secured
seems unwarranted, and consequently only portions will be used to
illustrate the conclusions drawn. The trials were rarely run in
duplicate, preference being given to repeated successive trials, which
were feasible since practically all environmental factors were under
control and the data were based on average temperature readings.
Control flasks, i.e., flasks containing untreated tobacco, were run,
however, in connection with practically all trials.
The typical thermal behavior of such a control may be noted from
the graph shown in figure 4. The tobacco being placed in the flask
at room temperature and the flask then placed in an incubator averag-
ing 30.5° C. (87° F.)^ the temperature rose very rapidly during the
July 15,1934 Studies on the Fermentation of Tobacco 143
first 24 hours as a consequence of both the heat from without and the
thermogenesis from within, which in the presence of sufficient moisture
usually gets under way the first day. The temperature normally
continues on the upgrade in the flasks for 3 to 5 days, after which time
it usually declines gradually. This decline is in part due to a reduc-
tion of the potential heat-producing constituents of the tobacco,
since if this same lot of tobacco is removed and replaced in the flask
with the original moisture content, the temperature curve is lowered
and shortened. However, a gradual reduction in available oxygen
and an accumulation of gases such as ammonia and carbon dioxide
injurious to thermogenesis may also play a role in this decline.
EFFECT OF MOISTURE
^
/
/TIGHT PA CK
/ /
/
ê
i
^^OOSE PACK
Ü
2
Y
<
a:
<>
1
ií
25 30 35 40 45 60 55
MOISTURE (PERCENT)
FIGURE 5.—Relation of percentage of moisture and tightness of packing to the thermogenic activity of
tobacco in thermos bottles held at an average temperature of 30.2° C.
Average temperature
Moisture
(percent) Ammonia Carbon
dioxide Odor Color of
extract
Incubator Flask Increase
° C. °C.
30.4 30.3 31.0 0.7 + 0 Raw +
32.9 30.3 31.3 1.0 + —do ++
34.2 30.3 31.9 1.6 ++ + Mild ++
37.9 30.3 32.9 2.6 +++ ++ —do +++
41.5 30.3 32.7 2.4 +++ +++ Good +++
50.0 30.3 34.8 4.5 +++ +++ Strong +++
54.3 30.3 35.0 4.7 +++ +++ —do +++
In this and succeeding tables, plus signs indicate relative amounts, i.e., + small, ++ medium, +4-4-
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE
o
o
UJ
g"
<tr / \53pE RCENT MOI 5TURE
UJ
a.
/
/
/ ^^
Z
/
/ J y^ ^
UJ
/ •^-.<.
UJ
\
£E
Ü PERCENT MOISTURE
\
Z
\ \
Ul , ^^ \ \
ce
^ \
UJ
\
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
TEMPERATURE ('C.)
FIGURE 6.—Relation of temperature of incubation to the thermogenic activity of tobacco at two different
moisture contents.
Average temperature
Moisture Ammonia Carbon Color of Peroxi-
(percent) dioxide Odor extract dase
Incubator Flask Increase
° C. ° C. ° C.
39.3 9.8 9.3 2-0.5 0 0 Raw ++ ++
38.3 16.6 17.8 1.3 ++ ++ do ++ +++
39.1 20.0 23.7 3.7 ++ +++ Good +++ +++
37.8 25.4 28.0 2.6 +++ +++ Strong +++ +++
37.0 27.0 28.4 1.4 +++ +++ do +++ +++
37.3 36.6 38.4 1.8 +++ +++ do +++ +++
37.0 44.1 44.9 .8 4- 0 Mild +++ +++
38.0 48.5 48.3 2-.2 0 0 do +++ +
I See footnote, table 1. 2 Decrease.
Judging from the results obtained with the thermos bottles, fer-
mentation apparently does not proceed much below 18° C. (65° F.)
70
FIGURE
10
m^ 20 30 40
DAYS
50 60 70
Average
Heat treatment of 150 g of tempera- Ammonia Carbon Peroxi- Bacteria Fungi
tobacco ture in- dioxide dase
crease
°C.
None . - - -- 4.3 +++ ++ H-++ +++ ++
20 minutes, to 45° C _ _ _ 2.8 +++ ++ +++ ++ ++
30 minutes, to 67 ° C_ __ ___ 2.0 + ++ + + +
40 minutes, to 74° C ._ _ . .2 + 0 0 + +
45 minutes, to 80° C. 2-.1 0 0 0 0 0
60 minutes, to 85° C_-- _ _-. 2 -.2 0 0 0 0 0
According to Loew (14), many salts and bases are not harmful to
catalase activity, and some may be beneficial. Mercuric chloride
however, was found to be distinctly harmful, as was formaldehyde in
high concentrations (1 to 5). Chloroform was not found to be
148 Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 49, no. 2
destructive. While the data on this subject are not entirely clear
in differentiating between destruction and inactivation, nevertheless
the report by Jensen (5) that mercuric chloride, formol (formalde-
hyde) and chloroform do not prevent tobacco fermentation has been
regarded by some as strong evidence in support of Loew's theory of
enzymic fermentation, and good evidence against the microbial theory.
The results of the experiments here reported, in which the thermos-
bottle method was used, have been quite contradictory to those of
Jensen. Not only do mercuric chloride and chloroform effectively
prevent thermogenesis, but acetone, toluene, beta-napthol, and other
antiseptics at low concentrations also prevent thermogenic activity
(table 4). The data secured with formaldehyde were less certain.
Under the conditions of the experiments, both enzymes and microbes
were apparently inactivated but not necessarily destroyed by many
antiseptics. Chemicals other than antiseptics, such as ethylene
chlorhydrin, acids, and bases, were tested with the purpose of dis-
covering possible stimulatory action on thermogenic activity, but no
conclusive evidence in this direction was secured.
TABLE 4.—Effect of antiseptics and other chemicals on tobacco fermentation in
Dewar flasks ^
Per-
cent °(7. Number
None ! 37.0 30.3 33.7 3.4 +++0 +++0 Mild.._ +++ 100,000
Acetone, 5 cc 37.0 30.3 30.7 .4 raw +++ 120
Toluene, 5 cc 37.0 30.3 30.7 .4 0 0 _-do__. +++ 0
Chloroform, 1 cc 37.8 30.3 30.6 .2 + + —do__.
Formalin, 2 cc 51.1 30.0 31.7 1.7 +++0 ++0 —do-_. +++ 500
Mercuric chloride, 1 g 37.1 30.5 30.8 .3 ,-do__. ++ 0
Silver nitrate, 1 g 37.1 30.2 31.7 1.5 + +++ —do-_- +++ 0
Silver nitrate, 3 g 41.3 30.2 31.6 1.4 + +++ _-do-_. +++ 0
Ethylene chlorhydrin, 1 cc. 43.8 27.7 30.3 2.6 +++ +++ —do___
Strong- +++ 20,000
None - 43.8 27.7 32.4 4.7 +++ +++ -_.do__. ++ 50,000
Potassium hydroxide, 2.5 g-- 38.5 30.5 33.4 2.9 +++ +++ ++ 100,000
Oxalic acid, 0.5 g 41.0 30.3 34.4 4.1 +++ ++ .._do-_. +++ 10.000
Silver Average
Treatment of nitrate Artificial inoculation tempera-
tobacco, 150 g ture in- Peroxidase Bacteria Fungi
used
crease
Grams
Not sterilized _/ 0 None _-- 3.7 +++ +++ +
do 1.5 +++ 0
I1 ""'doI"""""""I-^
4.6
2-1
0
0
H-
0
+++
0
Sterilized 1 Aspergillus flavus — 0 0 0 +
1 Aspergillus ochraceus .3 0 0 +
1 Aspergillus terreus 0 0 0 +
0 4.1 0 0 +++
1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Decrease.
PRODUCTION OF AMMONIA
The desired results of fermentation are those which bring about the
best flavor and aroma in tobacco. While the term ''aroma'ls some-
times used in referring to leaf tobacco, it should preferably be reserved
for cigars or manufactured tobacco and particularly for the smoking
quality. The term ^'odor^' will therefore generally be used for the
changes which occur during fermentation. Chemically, there may be
no particular relation between the odor and the aroma, although in
practice a desirable odor is believed to bring about a desirable aroma.
The lack of any standard of measurement of odor, either qualitative
or quantitative, makes it a difficult problem to attack. The ability
of some persons to judge odor by the sense of smell is, to be sure, often
remarkably developed, and, following much and varied experience,
may be, for all practical purposes, sufficiently reliable for fine dis-
tinctions. In the present experiments it has been necessary to con-
fine the estimations to rather wide differences in odor. The designa-
tion ^*strong'' odor may be quite unsatisfactory, however, since it
probably more correctly refers to the odor of ammonia, which may
actually mask other odors of greater significance. The terms ''raw''
and ''none", "mild" and "good" are more rehable. "Sweet" or
"pleasant" odors were rather unusual types, secured at the higher
temperatures, and may not have been of a true fermentative nature.
No fermentative odors are produced in the thermos bottles in the
period of 10 days unless the moisture content is above about 32 per-
cent, even though some heat production and some gases may be
evident. At a 35-percent moisture content, however, a fair develop-
ment of odor occurs at 30° C. (86° F.) in 10 days and apparently
increases rapidly in direct proportion to the moisture present, up to a
45-percent moisture content or more, in which case a very strong but
undesirable odor occurs in considerably less than 10 days. With a
moisture content of 35 to 40 percent, no apparent fermentative odor
develops below 18°, in 10 days. At temperatures beyond 20°, the
July 15,1934 Studies 071 the Fermentation oj Tobacco 151
30
2 20
10
AT I I I IM0 10 20 30
TEMPERATURE (''c.)
40 50 60
FIGURE 8.- -Relation of temperature to the activity of catalase as measured by the evolution of oxygen from
hydrogen peroxide.
KiouRE 9.—Relation of temperature of incubation of tobacco in Dewar flasks for the 10 days to the
development of micro-organisms; A, 9.4° C; B, 14.8°; C, 19.9°; D, 24.4°; E, 27..')°; F, 30.7°; G, 35.5°;
H, 40.2°.
Filter-
Treatment of 150 sterile Average
tobacco Moisture temperature Ammonia Carbon Peroxidase Fungi
g of tobacco extract dioxide
increase
added
cc Percent ° C.
40 36.3 2-0.1 + 0 0 0
60 43.2 .1 + 0 + 0
Sterilized 80 46.0 2 -.1 + + + 0
3 60 43.8
43.1
4.1 +++ +++ + ++
I 0 0 0 0 0
Not sterilized 0 35.0 3.3 +++ +++ +++ +
I See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Decrease. 3 Accidental contamination.
MICROBIAL RELATIONS
FiciURE 10.—I.arüC niinilicrs of a Staphylococcun species seciircrl in dilution plate.s from fermenting tobacco,
and tlie relative size of these colonies as compared with three colonies of large bacteria.
Per- Num-
cent ° C. ° C. ° C. Number ber
Ohio (1931) Dutch.. 39.0 23.9 26.9 3.0 +++ +++ Strong. 100,000 50,000
Do Zimmer. 38.3 23.9 26.4 2.6 +++ +++ .-.do—. 150,000 80,000
Connecticut (1930). Havana 38.5 23.9 25.2 1.3 + + Mild.-. 100,000 1,000
seed.
Connecticut (1931) ...do..... 35.0 23.9 26.6 2.7 +++ +++ —do—.
Good-. 100,000 200
Massachusetts (1931) ...do.-... 38.0 23.9 26.1 2.2 +++ +++ 80,000 0
Canada (1929) ...do-.... 44.2 23.9 27.2 3.3 ++ +++ —do-.- 100,000 3,000
Wisconsin southern (1931) _ .-.do-—, 27.3 23.9 23.9 0 + 0 Raw--. 30 0
Wisconsin northern (1931). .-.do-—, 33.0 23.9 26.7 2.8 + Slight- 100,000 30
Pennsylvania (1931) .--do—. 41.2 23.9 29.0 5.1 +++ +++ Strong . 150,000 40,OOD
Average
tempera- Ammo- Carbon Perox- Color of
Inoculum Moisture ture in- dioxide idase extract
nia
crease
Percent ' C.
Aspergillus niger 37.0 4.2 ++ + 0
Aspergillus ochraceus... 36.1 3.6 +++ + 0 +
Aspergillus terreus.. 37.7 6.1 +++ ++ 0 +++
Aspergillus flavus 37.8 2.8 +++ + 0 +++
Pénicillium brevicaule... 40.0 2.7 +++ +++ 0 +++
Pénicillium baiiolum— 37.5 .3 ++ 0 0 +
Oospora sp 39.1 .6 ++ 0 0
Bacterium sp. 1 38.7 2 . .2 0 0 0 +
Bacterium sp. 2 40.1 .1 0 0 0 +
Siaphylococcus sp 39.0 .1 0 0 0 +
Not inoculated; control 38.1 0 + 0 0 +
Not sterilized; control.. 39.8 .. 1 +++ +++ +++ ++
1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Decrease.
bacteria affect any other measurable changes in the leaf under the
conditions of the tests. Certain fungi, however, not only usually
induced a striking generation of heat, and a resultant production of
ammonia and carbon dioxide, but developed odors and other charac-
teristics fairly typical of fermenting tobacco (table 8). Other fungi
evidently were capable of httle or no influence of a fermentative
nature. Detailed studies are required, however, before satisfactory
conclusions can be drawn in regard to the comparative activity and
actual influence of these and other fungi on the fermentation process
under both experimental and commercial conditions.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
As understood in the present investigation, the fermentation of
cigar-leaf tobacco is an oxidation process resulting in the formation
of carbon dioxide and the generation of heat, together with a general
improvement in the desired qualities of the tobacco, usually accom-
panied by the production of ammonia. The influence on quality
may be of various kinds, but in general the process eventually removes
a ^^green'' or raw taste and odor and develops an aroma. The
immediate result may often be the formation of such amounts of
ammonia and other products as to render the leaf excessively strong,
and the benefits of subsequent storage and aging are in part at least
due to the gradual loss of such objectionable substances.
The oxidation process may no doubt be brought about in different
ways or at least at markedly different rates, depending upon the en-
vironmental conditions. The results secured in the present studies
have not eliminated any of the hypotheses held at present as to the
nature of the causative agent in fermentation but have rather added
some support to both the enzymic and microbial hypotheses. The
latter hypothesis has been in danger of being totally discarded from
consideration without all the evidence being taken into consideration,
Loew's {12, 13) conclusions, for instance, are particularly weak with
respect to microbial behavior in tobacco, though his evidence for
'^ oxidizing enzymation" is convincing. Evidently the chief basis for
denying any essential relationship between fermentation and micro-
bial activity is the low moisture content present in tobacco types which
are "reordered'' or redried before being placed in storage. Flue-
cured tobacco, in particular, is much more susceptible to fungus de-
velopment than is cigar tobacco, and unless stored in a condition
relatively dry as compared with storage conditions for cigar-leaf
tobacco, usually becomes overgrown with fungi to a damaging extent.
However, neither the results nor benefits of fermentation as contrasted
with those of aging are clearly defined in redried tobacco, and it is
quite conceivable that a slow oxidation, entirely independent of micro-
organisms, may proceed in such tobaccos. On the other hand,
millions of pounds of stemming tobacco and cigar tobacco are regularly
stored or processed in such a manner as to render microbial develop-
ment certain. It is not unlikely that this procedure has some essential
relation to the desired results. Whether this procedure is to be re-
garded as of the nature of fermentation or special processing may be
open to question.
While it has been claimed by Jensen iß) and by Smirnov {20), on
the basis of trials with antiseptics, that fermentation may proceed
75317—34 5
158 Journal of Agricultural Research voi. 49, no. 2
in the absence of microbial activity, the data presented are not con-
vincing on this point. Evidently the selective influence of various
antiseptics on enzymes and microbes under different circumstances
needs more intensive study. Silver nitrate appears to possess this
differential property more completely than any of the other antiseptics
used, and, on the basis of the results secured with this chemical, it
seems evident that fermentation may proceed in the absence of micro-
bial activity. On the other hand, fermentative changes of an ap-
parently normal character may evidently be brought about by various
fungi in tobacco heated sufficiently to destroy all other forms of
activity. Bacteria, which have previously been generally believed
to be concerned in this process, were not found to be capable of de-
veloping thermogenic activity.
SUMMARY
Microbial and enzymic factors which may be concerned with the
fermentation of cigar-leaf tobacco were investigated by the Dewar-
flask method. Modifications of technic were used which permitted
of operations under aseptic conditions and inoculations with pure
cultures of micro-organisms.
With 150 g of tobacco, average temperature increases in Dewar
flasks over a 10-day period ran as high as 5.6° C. In general, the
generation of heat (thermogenesis) was directly proportional to the
percentage of moisture present, a minimum of about 30 percent being
necessary to secure measurable activity under the conditions of the
experiments.
The highest thermogenic increases occurred at incubator tempera-
tures of about 20° to 25° C, very little if any activity developing at
temperatures below 10° C. (50° F.) or above 45° C. (113° F.). This
experimental maximum temperature is considerably lower than the
temperature often allowed in practice by the bulk-fermentation
method, and suggests the possibility of obtaining better results at
more moderate temperatures.
Chloroform, mercuric chloride, acetone, toluene, or beta-napthol
may almost completely check thermogenesis. These antiseptics
check microbial activity, and although they do not destroy peroxi-
dase and other enzymes, they apparently cause inactivation. Silver
nitrate, on the other hand, reduces thermogenesis under simüar con-
ditions to only about one-half that which normally obtains. It is
believed that süver nitrate prevents microbial activity without being
harmful to the action of enzymes under the conditions of the ex-
periments.
Heating the tobacco to a sufficientlyhigh temperature will completely
check thermogenesis or any other expression fermentation, provided
aseptic conditions are maintained. Treating such tobacco asepti-
cally with porcelain-filtered extract from unheated tobacco con-
taining peroxidase and other enzymes failed to induce thermogenesis.
Three species of bacteria commonly occurring on tobacco failed to
induce thermogenic activity in heated tobacco, but several fungi iso-
lated from tobacco were very efficient in this respect, yielding results
thermogenically and otherwise comparable to normal fermentation.
The evidence appears to justify the conclusion that micro-organ-
isms, especially fungi, may play a role in the fermentation or in the
July 15,1934 Studies OU the Fermentation qf Tobacco 159
(19) SCHLOESING, T. H.
1888-89. SUR LA FERMENTATION EN MASSES DU TABAC POUR POUDRE.
Mem. Manfr. État, Tabacs—Allumettes 1: [514]-552, 1888:
2: 119-136, 192-210, 1889.
(20) SMIRNOV, A. I.
1933. THE PHYSIOLOGICO-BIOCHEMICAL PRINCIPLES OF TOBACCO CURING
AND FERMENTATION. 507 pp., ülus. Krasnodar. (Tabako-
vedenie t. 3).
(21) SUCHSLAND, E.
1891. UEBER TABAKSFERMENTATION. Ber. Deut. But. Gesell. 9: 79-81.
(22) VERNHOUT, J. H.
1899. RAPPORT OVER HET BACTERIOLOGISCH VAN GEFERMENTIERDE
TABAK. Ber. Lands Plantentuin 34. [Abstract in Centbl.
Bakt. [etc.] (II) 4: 778-779.J
(23) WHITNEY, M., and MEANS, T. H.
1899. TEMPERATURE CHANGES IN FERMENTING PILES OF CIGAR-LEAF
TOBACCO. U.S. Dept. Agr. Rept. 60,28 pp., illus.