Research Proposal: 1.0 Statement of The Problem
Research Proposal: 1.0 Statement of The Problem
Research Proposal: 1.0 Statement of The Problem
1
The branches of study that are now called as sciences once fell
under the heading of philosophy, an umbrella term that suggested the pursuit
of knowledge. As recently as the early 19 th century, physicists and chemists
were still referred as philosophers. Adam Smith, who organized the modern
study of economics, was known as a moral philosopher, rather than as an
economist. The word scientist was invented in 1840 by an English writer
William Whew ell. It came gradually to refer the natural science in contrast to
other branches of study that were not considered to use the scientific method.
2
student’svoices. This paper attempts a mapping of relevant literature in order
to highlights crucial outcomes and draw educational and research implications.
It is suggested that a comprehensive and integrated investigation of the voices
of students, of school science and teachers” and of popular science is required
in order to make informed, research based decisions on designing school
science curricula and teaching.
3
course. This study highlights the motivational aspects of the methods, course
in developing interest in science and interest I teaching science.
4
5.0 HYPOTHESES
On the basis of the above objectives, the following null hypotheses have been
formulated:
The level of scientific interest of the higher secondary students is high.
There is no significant difference between higher secondary male and
female students in their scientific interest.
There is no significant difference the scientific interest among higher
secondary students and the basis of their communities.
There is no significant difference the scientific interest among higher
secondary students and the basis of their religions.
There is no significant difference the scientific interest among higher
secondary students and the basis of their residence.
There is no significant difference in the scientific interest of higher
secondary students based on their types of management.
There is no significant difference in the scientific interest of higher
secondary students based on their father’s occupation.
There is no significant difference in the scientific interest of higher
secondary students based on their mother’s occupation.
6.0 METHODS
The present study is aimed at finding out the scientific interest among
higher secondary school students. The normative survey method has been used.
The scientific interest scale constructed and standardised by Nellaiyappan has
been administered to random sample of 350 higher secondary school students.
The data had been subjected to statistical techniques like descriptive and
differential analysis
5
6.1 SUBJECTS
The Random sampling technique has bee used for the present study. The
sample included 350 higher secondary school students in two different school in
Cuddalore District. The distribution of the sample selected for the present
investigation.
6.2 PROCEDURE
1. The sample
2. Delimitation of the study
3. Tools used for the study
4. Data collection procedure
5. Scoring procedure
6. Statistical Techniques used
6
6.3 DATA ANALYSIS