IDP Annual Report FY20
IDP Annual Report FY20
IDP Annual Report FY20
Contents
1 Highlights
2 Chairman and CEO’s Message
4 he year our global platform connected
T
our community
6 The year of vision-led innovation
9 The year our community goals came into focus
10 Board of Directors
12 Financial Report
102 Shareholders Information
104 Corporate Directory
2020 highlights
The year disruption was met with innovation Growth despite challenges
FY19 97.1m
11%
students and 7,100 clients institutions accepted IELTS Indicator,
attended our virtual events a temporary online IELTS test, offered
across our global network at the peak of COVID-19 restrictions
26,800 35,000
global challenges, IDP’s responsible
management and innovative services
helped deliver a commendable
financial outcome
students shifted to online students and counsellors connected
learning for IDP’s English on IDP’s virtual office platform
language teaching schools
across Cambodia and Vietnam
74%
While at the time we knew this
face teaching resumes.
was an important step in our ability
to get digital products to market,
we could not have foreseen how Taking decisive action
quickly this hub would return benefits to guide the company
of students are holding on to their for our customers. The year-end financial result
international education goals,
reflected the responsible actions
according to IDP Connect research When COVID-19 began to impact our and foresight of our Board and
global community and economy, IDP’s leadership team.
response was guided by three goals:
to keep customers at the centre of our While revenue was down 2%
decision making; to take fast, decisive on last year, it was our prudent
actions to shore up the financial decisions and cost control
position of the company; and to measures that saw the company
remain focused on our longer term deliver a commendable outcome.
strategic goals.
The early move to raise additional
Whilst our full year financial equity to shore up our balance sheet
performance was below our original was widely applauded and we were
expectations, we are proud of how met with very strong demand for our
our business has responded to events capital raising.
outside of our control.
One platform.
One experience.
One global community.
IDP’s global platform is providing Students and parents who, understandably, seek unbiased
advice from others who have been before them, can ask
a space for students and educators video questions through an IDP app called Ask IDP. These
are answered by alumni, universities and IDP counsellors,
to connect wherever and however forming a bank of searchable content in the process.
they choose.
The next chapter introduces propensity modelling and
data-led customer profiling to further ensure students
Powered by the world’s leading and universities are matched based on similar goals,
international student dataset, abilities and outcomes.
IDP’s global platform is transforming Alongside this, we are improving our online support
tools for IELTS, so students can head into their IELTS
international education services test confident they are well positioned to achieve their
by combining insights with real best score on test day.
human experiences. Driving the whole platform is big data. The data
insights are critical for our higher education partners
While FY17-19 focused on building technology as they provide a detailed view of the students’
infrastructure, this was the year our connected journeys and capabilities. This means educators can
community began to take shape. focus their attention on attracting the right student
for their institution.
In its simplest sense, our technology platform is
transitioning to a global marketplace. This is where The connected community premise is based on this:
students, alumni and institutions connect for conversations International education thrives when students are matched
and transactions — all supported by IDP’s data insights with the right university in the right country with the right
and quality screening processes. support system.
We are heading towards an ‘always-on’ model where We are making this possible through trusted human
students and their parents will be able to regularly connections and deep insights.
schedule live-chat sessions with universities to progress
their admissions applications or ask questions about
studying abroad.
Customer
Face-to-face
IDP Data with IDP
Rich dataset enabling Leading office network
propensity modelling so and physical event
we can help students calendar for students
and clients find their and families to connect
ideal match. with counsellors for
trusted conversations
Test with IDP and briefings.
English testing services
to help customers
achieve language goals
through combination of
test preparation support
and test product
options.
70
desire to stay engaged with customers when global countries offered IELTS
lockdowns went into place. Indicator at the peak of
COVID-19 related restrictions.
Shifting student events online
IDP adapted its popular international education
roadshows to a virtual model.
Within two months, a global platform was underway Deep data insights lead policy
that allowed for one-on-one university and student
interviews and broader seminar sessions.
and drive decisions
IDP Connect’s position as the industry’s insights-driven
More than 60,000 students and 7,100 university client thought leader was boosted when its International
representatives attended virtual events in Q4. This is Student Crossroads research was published in early
higher than the number of attendees at our physical May. The report, which explored how COVID-19 disruptions
events for the same period in FY19. impacted students’ aspirations to study internationally,
provided insights for policy makers, universities and
The virtual event model allowed IDP teams to nurture governments around the world.
students through the decision-making journey while
offices were closed and events were suspended. As the industry grappled with how to do more with less, our
global data became critically important for clients looking
Importantly, we kept our customers satisfied. Close to to stay connected with students.
9 in 10 students would recommend IDP’s virtual events
to family and friends. Our combination of data and in-country insights provided
a bigger picture view of challenges and opportunities in
market, enabling our clients to respond to students with
Virtual counselling the support they were looking for. In doing so, we are
Supporting the virtual events model, IDP shifted counselling bringing the voice of students to the forefront of policy-
services to phone and video delivery. This enabled IDP to level decision making.
cultivate and build the pipeline of international students
for our clients despite disruptions to the traditional service
delivery model.
IELTS Indicator
IELTS Indicator, an online test of Listening, Reading,
In the initial days of COVID-19 travel restrictions, daily Writing and Speaking, was introduced in April. Launched
webinars and briefings provided students with a source to help students impacted by centre closures, IELTS
of truth from trusted sources amongst an overwhelming Indicator aimed to help students progress study
supply of contradictory and confusing announcements. applications in countries where IELTS testing was
not available.
Our virtual connections also extended to peer-to-peer
support. Within six weeks from idea to delivery, Ask Embraced by both universities and students, the test was
IDP was launched, an app that invites students to ask delivered in 70 countries and was accepted by more than
questions via short video messages. IDP’s connected 900 leading universities and education providers.
community of universities, alumni and staff then
respond via video, creating a searchable bank of As local restrictions were eased country by country,
authentic user-generated content. IELTS Indicator was removed from the market to
encourage students to return to IELTS’ world-leading
secure test centres.
6 IDP Annual Report 2020
IDP’s culture of customer-
centric decision making
meant teams were determined
to stay closely connected
to students throughout
this period of disruption.
The services we innovated
will now form integral parts
of our global platform.
Peter was appointed as a Andrew was appointed as Ariane was appointed as a David was appointed as a
Non-Executive Director at Chief Executive Officer and Non-Executive Director at Non-Executive Director at
IDP in March 2007. Managing Director at IDP in IDP in November 2015 and is IDP in February 2011. He was
August 2015. Chair of the Audit and Risk appointed Vice-Chancellor
Peter has broad experience Committee. of the University of Ballarat
in the financial services Andrew has extensive in 2006 and, in 2014, he
industry, first as Managing experience in the As the CEO of Scale became Foundation
Director of the international technology, services and Investors, Ariane works to Vice-Chancellor of
funds management business software industry, with activate investment capital Federation University
with the Colonial Group, over 20 years of senior for female entrepreneurs Australia completing his
then as an executive with management experience in and gender balanced term of office in 2016.
the Commonwealth Banking roles across Australia, New startups to support
Group with responsibility Zealand, Asia and North growth for early stage He took up his current
for all investment and America. businesses. She is a member appointment as an Adjunct
insurance services, of the Murdoch Children’s Professor at Southern Cross
including the group’s funds Prior to joining IDP, Andrew Research Institute (MCRI) University in 2017.
management, master worked for SAP as President Investment Committee, and
funds, superannuation and of Australia and New is a former Board Member of His previous senior
insurance businesses and Zealand. Emergency Services & State appointments have been at
third party support services Superannuation (ESSSuper) universities in Australia and
for brokers, agents and Prior to his role at SAP, New Zealand and he has
financial advisers. Andrew held leadership Ariane has extensive undertaken consultancies
roles at Unisys, including experience in international for UNESCO, the OECD
He is the Chairman of as Vice President of finance, risk management, and various government
Challenger Limited (listed Unisys’ Asia Pacific Japan and debt and equity capital agencies .
company director since operations covering 13 markets, having worked in
November 2003), Challenger countries, as Member of executive roles with JBWere He was foundation Chair
Life Company Limited, Avant Unisys’ Global Executive (part of National Australia of the Australian Regional
Group Insurance Limited Committee and as Bank), Merrill Lynch, Universities Network and
and Very Special Kids. Chairman of Unisys West, Goldman Sachs and HSBC the board of the Museum
a technology services joint in the United States, Europe, of Australian Democracy
He is also a director of venture between BankWest Japan, Hong Kong and at Eureka and is currently
Avant Mutual Group Limited and Unisys. Australia. on the board of directors of
and Avant Group Holdings the Melbourne Institute of
Limited. Earlier in his career, Ariane is a graduate and Technology.
Andrew was Vice President member of the Australian
and General Manager of Institute of Company He is also Deputy Chair
PeopleSoft’s Asia Pacific Directors (AICD). of the Board of Education
region. Australia Limited.
13 Directors’ Report
27 Remuneration Report
45 Auditor’s Independence Declaration
46 Financial Report
97 Directors’ Declaration
98 Independent Auditor’s Report
The Directors of IDP Education Limited, present the financial report of IDP Education Limited (the Company) and its controlled
entities (the Group or IDP) for the financial year ended 30 June 2020.
* Adjusted NPAT and earnings per share excludes acquired intangible amortisation.
The Directors believe these adjustments and other non-IFRS measures included in this report are relevant and useful in measuring the financial
performance of the company. Later in the report the Directors also present “underlying” financial measures which remove the impact of foreign
exchange movements during the year. The Directors believe that these “adjusted” and “underlying” metrics provide the best measure to assess
the performance of the Group by excluding the impact of currency movements, non-cash intangible asset amortisation generated from business
combinations from the reported IFRS measures.
** The Group has adopted the new lease accounting standard, AASB 16 Lease from 1 July 2019. The impact to FY20 from the adoption of the new
accounting standard is outlined above. The FY19 comparatives were under the previous lease accounting standard AASB 117 and have not been
restated as permitted by the standard.
# Growth is calculated by comparing the FY20 statutory results (post AASB16) to the FY19 statutory results which have not been restated and are
therefore presented on a pre AASB16 basis.
Review of Operations
IDP has a global footprint and a diversified business model across its four business lines. As a result, the aggregate
performance of the company for any given year is driven by a large number of variables across many countries.
This report provides a high-level summary of the highlights and key drivers during the year.
The performance of IDP Education in the first nine months of FY20 was strong with revenue growth of 19.2% compared to
the same period in FY19 representing a continuation of the strong organic growth that the company has been experiencing
over the past eight years. However the financial impact of COVID-19 on the business was evident from the end of March
and revenue declined by 64% in the last quarter compared to the same period in FY19 leading to an overall decline in
revenue of 1.8% for the full year.
COVID-19 and the resulting travel bans and lockdowns in both source and destination countries severely impacted
the international education industry during the last quarter of FY20. International mobility effectively ceased which
restricted the ability of students to commence their overseas studies and created uncertainty for future students who
were considering enrolments during 2020. IELTS testing was also impacted with lockdowns and social distancing
measures forcing the closure of testing centres throughout most of IDP’s network.
IDP’s largest destination (by volume), Australia, was the first to be impacted following the imposition by the Government
of a travel ban from 1 February 2020 for all foreign nationals that had been in China in the previous 14 days. This impacted
the ability of many Chinese students who were due to commence their courses in semester one. The extension of the travel
ban to all non-citizens on 19 March effectively closed the borders to international students and significantly reduced the
volume of students for the second semester intake.
IDP’s other study destinations have also been impacted but the timing of the main intakes in the northern hemisphere
softened the financial impact during FY20. IDP had achieved strong volume growth to the UK and Canada for semester
one (September/October 19) which was reflected in the company’s first half results. Volumes for the smaller intakes in
the second half were also above last year as students were able to commence studies before travel bans were imposed.
COVID-19 has however impacted IDP’s ability to finalise enrolments for the autumn intake in the northern hemisphere
which was a drag on the performance of the company during the last quarter of FY20.
Whilst a smaller destination for IDP, the USA also recorded a solid increase in student volumes during the first half of FY20.
Sentiment towards the US as an international education destination however remains mixed. Concerns over the openness
of the country and safety for international students continue to impact aggregate demand.
IDP Education’s English language testing business continued to see strong momentum through the first nine months of the
year with the demand for IELTS tests being driven by international students, workers and migrants who were seeking to
travel to the main English speaking countries. The imposition by governments of physical lockdowns forced the closure
of IELTS testing centres in many countries which significantly reduced IDP’s English language testing revenue. IDP’s biggest
testing country, India entered a lockdown on 24 March which remained largely in place throughout the remainder of the
financial year.
Despite the impacts from COVID-19, the Group has sufficient cash reserves to meet any obligations or liabilities as and
when they become due and payable.
IDP Education views and manages its business on a geographic basis. Country and regional management are responsible
for all activities in their geographic region across each of the company’s key products (Student Placement, English Language
Testing, English Language Teaching and Digital Marketing and Events). As a result, the company’s key reporting segments
comprise geographic regions. The sections below discuss the company’s results across its three geographic regions.
Asia
The table below shows the company’s results across its Asian region which includes the following countries: Bangladesh,
Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Mauritius, Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea,
Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Asia total revenue declined marginally by 0.7% the first decline in 10 years but posted a solid year of growth in EBIT of
12% and continued to be a key driver of the company’s profitability with 76% of group EBIT (excluding corporate overhead)
coming from the region. The region includes both India and China which are the key engines of growth for the international
education industry more broadly.
In India, IDP performed well during the year achieving growth in revenue relative to FY19. The performance of India benefited
from strong student demand for placement into higher education courses to the UK and Canada with Multi-destination
revenue growing 80%. Australian Student Placement and IDP IELTS volume growth in the second half was impacted by
COVID-19 and the result was a full year decline in Indian revenues from Australian student placement and IELTS.
Outside of India and China, IDP’s performance in Asia had revenue growth in Cambodia, Japan, Sri Lanka Bangladesh
and Thailand. In Cambodia, student placement and English language teaching were solid contributors to growth,
while in Japan and Thailand IELTS was the driver of the growth and in Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh growth came from
both student placement and IELTS.
Offsetting this growth, revenue declined in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Vietnam, Nepal, and Singapore. The decline in these
countries related to Australian student placement revenue and IELTS revenue in the last quarter due to COVID-19
lockdowns and travel restrictions.
EBIT growth of 12% was a result of the strong performance of the business in the first half and then management of
expenses as revenue declined in the last quarter with expenses declining for the full year, with the majority of that
reduction in expense being realised in the last quarter.
Australasia
The table below shows the company’s results across its Australasian region which includes the following countries:
Australia, Fiji, New Caledonia and New Zealand.
The Australasian segment revenue decline was a result of lower IELTS volumes across the region, primarily due to COVID-19.
There was a small 1% revenue increase in the first half as strong student placement revenue offset the decline in IELTS
revenue. The second half saw a continuation of that trend with growth in onshore student placement offsetting a decline
in IELTS testing due to lock-downs and social distancing measures.
The decline in EBIT of 20.6% was primarily a result of the IELTS revenue decline with expenses primarily related to the
student placement business were only marginally reduced as student placement onshore had revenue growth of 12%.
Rest of World
The table below shows the company’s results across the Rest of World region which includes: Argentina, Azerbaijan,
Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Ecuador, Egypt, Germany, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland,
Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”), the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.
The Rest of World recorded a small decline in both revenue and EBIT with declines in revenue in Canada and the Middle
East, offset by strong revenue growth in Nigeria and smaller digital marketing revenue growth in the UK and USA.
Canada’s revenue decline was due to lower IELTS testing volumes in the last quarter, with that offset a little due to onshore
student placement revenue growing strongly off a low base.
The Middle East is primarily an IELTS market with IELTS making up 80% of the revenue. After a very strong first half,
the Middle East suffered from COVID-19 in the last quarter when most test centres were closed.
The entry into Nigeria three years ago with the IELTS business has been very successful with very strong growth being
recorded in FY20. Digital marketing revenue in the UK and USA also grew during the year driven by new products and
services from IDP Connect.
Results by Service
To aid the reader’s understanding of the company’s results, IDP Education has also prepared financial results by secondary
segments which show revenue and gross profit by service. The analysis below discusses the operational and financial
highlights for each of the company’s services.
Note: The Average Fee for Student Placement shown in this table is calculated as total Student Placement revenue divided by the number of courses
IDP Education enrolled students into at its client education institutions during the period. Total Student Placement revenue includes all revenue
associated with all placements including any revenue received from the student. Volume data to calculate the Average Fee only includes IDP
Education client education institution course enrolments and excludes course enrolment volumes at education institutions that are not clients
of IDP Education.
Student placement volumes rose by 2.8% in FY20 and reflects the strong performance through until the end of March 2020
and then the decline in volumes in the last quarter compared to the previous year as COVID-19 stopped students travelling
to destination markets for the commencement of their courses.
Student Placement office expansion slowed in FY20 with a total network of 128 student facing offices at the end June 2020,
with the addition of a 3rd party office in Kenya and 2 offices in India in the first half of FY20.
Volumes to Australia declined 15.4% which reflected impact of COVID-19 on IDP students unable to travel from China for
the semester one intake in February, and uncertainty delaying students’ decisions for semester two. Growth in Australia
onshore volumes and growth in smaller markets of Hong Kong and Nepal were not enough to offset declines from India
and China which are IDP’s largest source markets of students.
Volumes to the UK increased by 22% with IDP’s focus on the higher quality institutions being rewarded by increasing
market share and volume growth in India, Indonesia and the Middle East.
The average student placement fee across the business increased by 8.9% relative to that recorded in FY19. A range
of factors contributed to this increase, including:
› A strong increase in commission rates negotiated with clients, particularly UK and Canadian Clients;
› A higher proportion of post-graduate and undergraduate courses and a lower proportion of English language and
pathway programs where students enrolled;
› Foreign exchange rates that were favourable during the year compared to FY19;
› Incentives paid by clients for achievement of volume targets
The Average Fee for English Language Testing is the average of all English Language Testing revenue divided by the total number of IELTS tests
conducted during the period.
In English Language Testing, IDP Education’s IELTS volumes declined 14.6% in FY20 taking the annual total to 1,095,600
tests — with a decline in volume due to the COVID-19 impact in the last quarter.
Declines in volume occurred in most markets due to the closure of test centres, however there was a number of markets
that despite the impact of these closures achieved growth compared to FY19. The markets that had material volume
increases were Nigeria, Japan, Uzbekistan, Lebanon, Sri Lanka and Chile.
The average fee for English Language Testing of 6% was primarily a benefit of favourable foreign exchange rates with
a 1% increase in the underlying price. The loss of the China License fee for five months offset the impact of price increases
taken in Australia and India.
IDP Education’s English Language teaching business comprises 9 schools across Cambodia and Vietnam. The division was
flat during FY20 with schools being closed during COVID-19 lockdowns and able to provide only limited online courses.
Total course volumes across the division were up 0.2% for the year to a record 94,400 courses.
Revenue grew by a higher rate due to a higher average course fee, with a benefit from foreign exchange as course fees
in Cambodia are charged and paid in US dollars.
The Digital Marketing and Events segment captures the revenue IDP generates from its student placement events and from
IDP-connect digital marketing business. Digital Marketing revenue had growth of 5% for the year after a stronger first half
growth of 12% slowed in the second half as institutions reduced marketing spend. Events are in-country recruitment fairs that
IDP holds to promote its university clients to prospective students and their families. Universities that attend these events pay
a fee to attend and meet IDP’s students in each source country. The events are run on a cost-recovery basis in some markets
and make a small loss in some markets and form a key part of the marketing activities for the company’s student placement
business. Physical events were unable to be held in most countries in the second half and IDP quickly established a platform
to hold virtual events, as a result the margin in the segment improved as virtual events are run at a lower cost.
The company generated a small amount of other revenue in FY20 which was derived via contracted activities
for development programs initiated by government or semi-government bodies, office services revenue and other
miscellaneous items. Revenue from these activities grew at 6.9% during the year, while gross profit declined 7.8%.
Financial Position
The financial position of IDP Education remains strong. As at 30 June 2020 the company had total assets of $701.9m
of which 19% related to intangible assets and the remaining being comprised primarily of cash, trade receivables and
property, plant and equipment. Total assets exceeded total liabilities by $392.9m.
Great British Pound Facility A: Acquisition funding 3-year unsecured Cash Advance loan facility for
£30,906,112 acquisition of UK subsidiaries
Australian Dollar Facility B: 3-year unsecured Cash advance facility to support both general corporate
$25,000,000 purposes and working capital requirements of the Group
Australian Dollar Facility C: Acquisition funding 3-year unsecured Cash Advance loan facility for
$5,000,000 investment in HCP Ltd
Australian Dollar Facility E: Guarantees, Transaction Facilities and Credit Card Merchant Facilities
$7,600,000
Australian Dollar Facility F: Working Capital facility to 30 June 2021
$150,000,000
From a cash perspective the company had $307.1m of cash on the balance sheet as at 30 June 2020.
To illustrate the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the FY20 result, IDP Education has restated
its FY19 results using the foreign exchange rates that were recorded in FY20. By comparing FY20 to the restated FY19
financials, IDP Education is able to isolate the underlying performance of the business during the period.
The table below summarises this analysis and by comparing to the Summary Financials on page 13 shows that foreign
exchange movements had a positive impact on the net profit after tax for the year. The weakening of the Australian dollar
contributed $22.7m favourable exchange movement in revenue, and $12.5m favourable exchange movement in gross profit
which offset the increase in expenses from exchange movement in IDP’s offshore operations. The impact of exchange
movements on net profit after tax was favourable $3.2m.
Underlying Growth
Growth
Unit FY20 FY20 FY19* $m %
Statutory Pre AASB16 Pre AASB16
Post AASB16
Total Revenue A$m 587.1 587.1 620.8 -33.7 -5.4%
Gross Profit A$m 345.2 342.6 346.5 -1.3 -0.4%
EBIT A$m 107.8 107.3 100.3 7.4 7.4%
NPAT A$m 67.8 71.5 69.0 -1.2 -1.8%
NPAT (Adjusted)** A$m 70.4 74.1 71.4 -1.1 -1.5%
* Calculated by restating the prior comparable period’s financial results using the actual FX rates that were recorded during the current period.
** Adjusted NPAT excludes acquired intangible amortisation.
IDP Education utilises a variety of methods to manage its foreign currency exchange rate risk. The key method is the use
of forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts. IDP Education’s hedging policy requires it to put in place
hedges to cover the expected net cash operating flows of certain currencies including the GBP, INR, CNY, CAD and SGD.
The impact of COVID-19 we expect will impact the intakes for student placement for FY21 to some degree. It is uncertain
when higher education institutions will be in a position to return to previous on campus activity levels. As the majority
of IELTS test takers undertake the test for academic or migration purposes until international borders are open for travel
and higher education institutions are able to allow international students to commence courses on campus, IELTS testing
volumes will likely be impacted.
In Student Placement, the multi-destination strategy has underpinned the company’s growth over recent years.
The company has made substantial investments in establishing capabilities in the United States, the United Kingdom,
Canada, New Zealand and Ireland, and it expects to continue to benefit from these investments as it grows volumes
to these destinations, once the COVID-19 impacts have ceased.
In Australia, IDP Education is well positioned to capitalise on growth in the number of international student enrolments to
Australian institutions. IDP Education has a market leading position and strong reputation in its existing source countries
for placing students to Australia. It will continue to build market share in these countries and will also look to leverage this
capability and reputation by selectively and incrementally expand its source country presence.
In addition to this organic volume growth IDP Education is driving longer term growth in Student Placement through the
use of technology. The investment in the digital platform for international students to engage with IDP Education beyond
just the traditional face-to-face counselling service which is the main element of the current service offering. The ongoing
enhancement of IDP Education’s digital platform, is enhancing the experience of all of its customers providing deeper and
richer ways to engage with students and clients throughout the international student journey.
IDP Education is also well positioned to capitalise on the continued growth in global demand for high-stakes English
language testing driven by the ongoing requirement for English language capability for the purpose of study, work
and migration.
The IELTS partners, IDP Education, British Council and Cambridge Assessment, have also invested significantly in systems,
testing approaches and technology to advance and improve the IELTS product.
Risks
An investor in IDP Education also needs to consider the risks that have the potential to impact the financial performance
of the company going forward. A number of these key risks are summarised below.
Regulatory risk — The company generates a substantial amount of income from placing international students into
education institutions in Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada and New Zealand. To the
extent that any of these destination countries alter immigration policies, regulation or visa requirements that reduce the
number of student or migration visas that they grant, this will have a direct impact on IDP Education’s student placement
enrolment volumes and/or IELTS test volumes and therefore revenue. Changes by government immigration authorities in
these destination countries that decrease or remove the acceptance of IELTS, increase competition from other providers
or change the way that tests are administered, could also have a material and adverse impact on the company’s financial
position and performance.
Geopolitical — Political events and tension, unfavourable press, negative international relations and other international
events may reduce the attractiveness of particular destination countries for students and other migrants originating
from particular source countries. Any future circumstances which reduce the attractiveness of a particular destination
country to foreign students or other migrants may have a material and adverse impact on the company’s financial
position and performance.
Risks of operating a global company — The global footprint which IDP Education operates across is exposed to regulatory,
operating and management complexities and risks. There are certain risks inherent in doing business in foreign jurisdictions
such as unexpected changes in legal and regulatory requirements, difficulties in managing foreign operations, longer
payment cycles, problems in collecting accounts receivable, political instability, expropriation, nationalisation, the
application of sanctions, embargoes or export and trade restrictions and war. There may also be foreign exchange
controls which restrict or prohibit repatriation of funds and prohibitions and delays from customers or government
agencies. These issues may arise from time to time, in the foreign jurisdictions in which IDP Education operates, which
could have a material and adverse impact on the company’s financial position and performance.
Competition — IDP Education operates in highly competitive markets across all of its geographies and products. IELTS
in particular competes with a number of alternative high-stakes English language tests and, in most jurisdictions, IDP
Education competes with the British Council as a distributor of IELTS. The following factors have the potential to reduce the
number or profitability of IELTS tests that are conducted by IDP Education and therefore could have a material and adverse
impact on the company’s financial position and performance: (i) the cost of sitting alternative high-stakes English language
tests being lower than that for IELTS; (ii) increased acceptance by destination education institutions and immigration
departments of alternative high-stakes English language tests; (iii) an increase in the number of testing centres, and times,
at which alternative high-stakes English language tests can be taken; (iv) alternative high-stakes English language tests
being marked in quicker timeframes when compared to those for IELTS; or (v) alternative high-stakes English language
tests being perceived to be fairer and/or more suited to people whose first language is not English.
Accordingly, there exists the potential for Education Australia to exert a significant degree of influence over the company’s
management and affairs and over matters requiring Shareholder approval, including (among other things) the election of
Directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions.
Directors
The following persons were Directors of IDP Education Limited during the financial year and up to the date of this report
unless otherwise stated:
Name Particulars
Peter Polson Non-Executive Director and Chairman
Andrew Barkla Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Ariane Barker Non-Executive Director
Professor David Battersby AM Non-Executive Director
Chris Leptos AM Non-Executive Director
Professor Colin Stirling Non-Executive Director
Greg West Non-Executive Director
Company Secretary
The Company Secretary is Murray Walton, who is also the Chief Financial Officer of the Group. Murray Walton is a member
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and a graduate member of the Australian Institute
of Company Directors (AICD).
Meetings of Directors
The following table sets out the number of meetings (including meetings of committees of directors), held for the year and
the number of meetings attended by each Director.
Principal activities
The Group’s principal activities during the year were:
› placement of international students into education institutions in Australia, UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland.
Services include counselling, application processing and pre-departure guidance;
› distribution and administration of International English Language Testing System (“IELTS”) tests, a globally recognised
high-stakes English language test for study, work and migration purposes. IDP is a co-owner of IELTS with the British
Council and Cambridge Assessment;
› operation of English language schools in Vietnam and Cambodia; and
› operation of digital marketing and event service.
There was no significant change in the nature of these activities during the year.
Following the institutional placement, on 7 May 2020, the Company successfully completed its Share Purchase plan (SPP),
which was offered to the eligible shareholders. The SPP proceeds was $29m with 2.8m new shares issued at $10.65 per share.
The proceeds of the Placement and SPP will be used to enhance balance sheet strength and financial flexibility,
and to support the business during the current macro-economic uncertainty by materially increasing liquidity.
COVID-19 impact
COVID-19 and the resulting travel bans and lockdowns in both source and destination countries severely impacted
the international education industry during the last quarter of FY20. International mobility effectively ceased which
restricted the ability of students to commence their overseas studies and created uncertainty for future students who
were considering enrolments during 2020. IELTS testing was also impacted with lockdowns and social distancing
measures forcing the closure of testing centres throughout most of IDP’s network.
The impact of COVID-19 we expect will impact the intakes for student placement for FY21 to some degree. It is uncertain
when higher education institutions will be in a position to return to previous on campus activity levels. As the majority of
IELTS test takers undertake the test for academic or migration purposes, until international borders are open for travel
and higher education institutions are able to allow international students to commence courses on campus, IELTS testing
volumes will be impacted.
Dividends
In respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2020, an interim dividend of 16.5 cents per share franked at 17% was declared
on 12 February 2020 and the payment was deferred to 24 September 2020. IDP’s Board of Directors has decided not to
declare a full year dividend.
In respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2019, an interim dividend of 12.0 cents per share franked at 50% was paid
on 29 March 2019. A final dividend of 7.5 cents per share franked at 45% was paid on 26 September 2019.
Non-audit services
The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s
expertise and experience with the Group are essential and will not compromise their independence.
Details of amounts paid or payable to the auditor Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for audit and non-audit services provided
during the year are outlined in Note 25 to the financial statements.
The Directors have considered the non-audit services provided during the year and are satisfied these services are
compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001 for the
following reasons:
› All non-audit services have been reviewed and approved to ensure that they do not impact the integrity and objectivity
of the auditor; and
› None of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in APES 110 ‘Code
of Ethics for Professional Accountants’ issued by the Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board, including
reviewing or auditing the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or decision-making capacity for the Group, acting
as advocate for the Group or jointly sharing economic risks and rewards.
Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board I am pleased to introduce IDP Education Limited’s (IDP) 2020 Remuneration Report for which
we seek your support at our Annual General Meeting in October 2020.
2020 was our fourth full year of operation since listing. As detailed in the financial section of our Report we were on track
for another record result when the COVID-19 pandemic began to impact our business operations across our regions.
The Board and management responded quickly and effectively in an effort to minimise the impact on the business.
Key initiatives adopted, included:
› A temporary 20% fixed annual remuneration reduction which was agreed to by all employees, executives and Directors.
The reductions implemented for each category have been as follows:
• Employees — 4 ½ months commencing 15 May 2020
• Global Leadership Team and Senior Leaders — 6 months commencing 1 April 2020
• Non-executive Directors — 6 months commencing 1 April 2020
• These adjustments will remain under review as we continue to respond to the ongoing impact of the pandemic.
Together we share the responsibility of caring for our customers and our company during this unusual period.
Our strong culture and values underpin our team’s response which has been universally supportive.
• Our people are at the very core of our business success and it is critical we retain our talented team to ensure
we are able to maximise the ‘rebound’ opportunities that will arise when restrictions to global mobility are lifted.
A detailed review of our business has been conducted to ensure our people are optimally assigned to strengthen
our operations and the services we deliver to our customers. Natural attrition has continued; however, replacement
of vacant roles has been tightly monitored.
› A capital raising was initiated to preserve IDP’s very strong financial position and provide a working capital buffer.
› Increased debt facilities were negotiated.
› Globally a reduction in all expense lines was achieved including renegotiation of leases, reduction in marketing spend
and accessing available government subsidies to partially offset revenue losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
There have been many positive achievements over 2020. These include:
› In Student Placement, an SP App was rolled out to 20 countries with 18,000 downloads by the end of the financial year.
Supporting students in their course selections and the introduction of Net Promoter Score in 15 countries has enabled us
to better understand student experience at 5 key customer journey points.
› In IELTS we developed a suite of supporting materials to ensure that test takers, teachers and referring partners were
able to optimise the computer delivered IELTS experience. This has resulted in an increased take up of this product
and created an online version of IELTS (IELTS Indicator) supporting 5,000 test takers. It enabled the recognition by
900 universities and helps to extend the reputation of IELTS and its brand.
› Virtual events connecting clients with 60,000 students in Q4, together with webinars and multichannel updates keep
customers and stakeholders abreast of rapid developments and continue to cement our position as a trusted leader
in International Education.
› Increased capability to provide data-driven intelligence regarding student sentiment and behaviour has enabled us to
further strengthen our brand, with our International Student Crossroads research allowing us to influence policy making
and gain recognition globally.
Notwithstanding the severe impact of COVID-19 we have managed to report a satisfactory financial performance for
the year. Revenue of $587m was marginally down year on year and NPAT of $68m was up 2%. Our share price volatility
reflects the uncertainty in the current global environment. Despite this volatility IDP has delivered a more than 400%
TSR since listing.
As always, remuneration was a key focus of your Board as we continued to ensure that there is alignment between
shareholders and management. Retention of talent is critical as we face IDP’s growth challenges, technological change,
our diverse geographies, community, Government and regulatory changes.
2020 has been a truly challenging year and these challenges will remain for the foreseeable future. As Chair of the
Remuneration Committee I will continue to work closely with my fellow Directors, external advisors and management
to ensure that IDP maintains a strong and effective talent pool ready to face the challenges ahead. This will most likely
require a greater degree of flexibility and discretion. Our objectives remain unchanged and that is to focus on shareholder
alignment, drive results and provide remuneration systems that reward and motivate employees to successfully execute
our business strategies.
I will continue to maintain contact with our key stakeholders to ensure transparency and that there is a clear
understanding of our remuneration strategies.
Peter Polson
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
19 August 2020
Key management personnel (KMP) is defined by AASB 124 Related Party disclosures. Only Directors, the Chief Executive
Officer and executives that have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of
IDP, directly or indirectly and are responsible for the entity’s governance are classified as KMP.
The KMP was established on the listing of the company in November 2015 and included in the Financial Reporting for FY16
onwards. On appointment of Mr Pental as Chief Operating Officer in FY19 the role was reviewed and it was determined
that the COO was not Executive KMP as he was not responsible for planning, directing and controlling activities of IDP
across the entire business. The review was completed again by the company secretary at the end of FY20 and as the
responsibilities of the role had expanded, the COO is now included in Executive KMP.
The KMP of IDP for the year ended 30 June 2020 were:
Remuneration governance
This section of the Remuneration Report describes the role of the Board and the Remuneration Committee, and the use
of remuneration consultants when making remuneration decisions.
In summary, the role of the Committee includes assisting and advising the Board on remuneration policies and practices
for the Board, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the other Executive KMP, senior executives and other persons whose
activities, individually or collectively, affect the financial soundness of the Company. The Committee advises the Board
on remuneration practices and policies which are fair and responsible to drive a performance culture and align with
shareholder outcomes.
The Committee’s role and interaction with the Board, internal and external advisors, are further illustrated below:
The Board
Reviews, applies judgement and, as appropriate, approves
Remuneration Committee’s recommendations
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee operates under the delegated authority of the Board
Remuneration framework
Legislative, regulatory
for Chair, non-executive Design features of Trends in base pay
or market developments
directors, and incentive schemes for senior executives
in relation to
remuneration packages and equity based relative to all
remuneration and
for CEO and senior remuneration Company employees
superannuation
executives
External Consultants
Internal Resources
Further information on the Committee’s role, responsibilities and membership is contained in the Corporate Governance
Statement. The Remuneration Committee Charter can also be viewed in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor
Centre of the IDP website.
During FY20, Crichton and Associates Pty Limited (Crichton and Associates) were engaged by the Board to provide
recommendations in relation to KMP and various other remuneration consulting services. Crichton and Associates
were paid (invoiced) $19,638 for these services.
The following arrangements were made to ensure that the remuneration recommendations have been made free from
undue influence:
› Crichton and Associates takes instructions from an independent Non-executive Director and the Committee and is
accountable to the Board for all work completed;
› During any assignment, Crichton and Associates may seek input from management, however deliverables are provided
directly to the Remuneration Committee and considered by the Board; and
› Professional fee arrangements are agreed directly with the Remuneration Committee Chairman.
Consequently, the Board is satisfied that the remuneration recommendations were made free from undue influence from
any member of the KMP.
In addition to providing remuneration consulting services, Crichton and Associates also provided services relating to other
aspects of remuneration of the Group’s employees, including the provision of valuation services, IDP Education Employee
Incentive Plan (IDIP) award offer documentation and other related advisory services. For these services Crichton and
Associates was paid (invoiced) $63,515 during FY20.
Remuneration strategy
IDP’s Board, Executive and Employee Remuneration Policy (Policy) aims to set employee and executive remuneration that
is fair, competitive and appropriate for the markets in which it operates and is mindful of internal relativities. IDP Education
aims to ensure that the mix and balance of remuneration is appropriate to reward fairly, attract, motivate and retain
senior executives and other key employees.
The Policy is drafted in such a way as to enable IDP to navigate the complexity of managing remuneration across numerous
geographies and varying job roles.
Executive KMP remuneration strategy and objectives are summarised in the table overleaf:
Fixed At Risk
Fixed Annual Remuneration (FAR) Short Term Incentives (STI) Long Term Incentives (LTI)
Remuneration overview
As discussed above, each executive’s total remuneration package may be comprised of the following elements:
› Fixed Annual Remuneration (FAR)
› At-Risk Remuneration:
• Short Term Incentive (STI)
• Long Term Incentive (LTI)
The illustration below provides an overview of the average FY20 Total Target Remuneration mix for the CEO,
other Executive KMP and senior executives of IDP compared to FY19.
The FY20 remuneration mix for the CEO is slightly below the performance aggressive range (33⅓:33⅓:33⅓) as
the weighting of the STI component has increased. The remuneration mix for other Executive KMP is slightly above
the performance balanced range (50:25:25) with the inclusion of the COO in this group.
In determining the Total Target Remuneration mix for the CEO and other Executive KMP, the Board has considered
the following:
› Setting market competitive FAR;
› Achieving an appropriate mix between fixed and variable remuneration;
› Providing a meaningful STI (targeted at up to 100% of FAR) aligned to the achievement of key financial and other
organisational metrics over the current financial year; and
› Providing meaningful LTI (targeted at up to 60% of FAR) aligned to meeting benchmark earnings (EPS CAGR) and share
growth (relative TSR) targets over a three (3) year performance period.
It is intended that if the benchmark targets are achieved then IDP will have outperformed and the CEO and other Executive
KMP will achieve top quartile remuneration benefits.
These changes were made after a thorough evaluation of the importance of the role and the incumbent and including
by reference to external market data, independently assessed.
IDP’s approach to FAR settings is to aim to position all executives between the median and 75th percentile of relevant
comparator group executives as determined by independent benchmark assessment and advice.
The table below applied logically, can be used as a guide to IDP’s remuneration setting process.
Executive KMP FAR is tested regularly for market competitiveness by reference to appropriate independent and externally
sourced comparable benchmark information, including comparable Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) listed companies,
and based on a range of size criteria including market capitalisation, revenue, number of employees taking into account
an executive’s responsibilities, performance, qualifications, experience and geographic location.
FAR adjustments, if any, are made with reference to individual performance, an increase in job role or responsibility,
changing market circumstances as reflected through independent benchmark assessments or through promotion.
Any adjustments made to Executive KMP remuneration are approved by the Board, based on Committee recommendations
referring to benchmarking data and the guidance of the independent remuneration consultant where appropriate.
Performance criteria set for STI plans reflect fundamental strategic or performance objectives to ensure a focused
and successful performance incentive program.
The target and maximum annual STI that may be awarded to Executive KMP is expressed as a percentage of FAR.
Purpose The STI arrangements at IDP are designed to reward executives for achievement against annual
performance targets set by the Board at the beginning of the performance period. The STI
program is reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board.
Performance During FY20, the key performance criteria of IDP were directed to achieving the following Board
criteria approved targets:
› Earnings before Interest and Taxation;
› Exceed budgeted growth in volume of hot and warm student placement leads
to global business;
› Year on year growth in the number of Applied students to all destinations;
› Increase IELTS market share year on year;
› Develop and implement complete suite of Computer delivered (CD) IELTS preparation
materials for test takers;
› Drive student referrals;
› Implement and embed Net Promoter Score (NPS) in Student Placement (SP) operations;
› Increase productivity in SP measured by the number of finalised students per dedicated sales
and counselling full time equivalent (FTE) team members;
› Launch the SP App in all offshore countries with localised content and accurate and timely
application data entered;
› Leadership development including succession plan for all Global Leadership Team (GLT) roles,
for mission critical roles.
The Board believes that these specific STI performance criteria support the strategic direction
of the Company and will encourage an increase in financial performance, market share and
shareholder returns.
Rewarding The STI performance weightings are set under a predetermined matrix with the Board
performance determination final.
Executive KMP’s STI have a stretch component that is designed to encourage above
at-target performance.
Performance period The STI performance period is for the financial year 1 July to 30 June.
STI payment The CEO’s STI is paid as follows:
› STI amounts up to $100,000 and 50% of any amount above $100,000 will be paid in cash
subsequent to 30 June 2020 following completion of the performance period and audit
of the associated financial statements; and
› 50% of any amount above $100,000 will be satisfied through a grant of service rights issued
under the IDIP. The service rights are subject to a vesting condition that the CEO remains
employed for a further 12 months from the end of the financial year.
The STI of other Executive KMP will be paid in cash subsequent to 30 June 2020 following
completion of the performance period and audit of the associated financial statements.
The performance criteria set are reviewed annually to ensure they align with the company’s evolving business strategies
and goals. The FY21 performance criteria will consist of a mix of financial (EBIT) and non-financial criteria.
FY21 budgets have been prepared at a time of significant uncertainty due to the uncertainty of impact and timing of any
economic recovery post COVID-19. Accordingly, the Board has implemented a process of quarterly budgeting and will be
required to impose a much higher degree of discretion in both setting and measuring performance for this year.
Long-term incentives
The IDP Education Employee Incentive Plan (IDIP) is the Company’s employee equity scheme.
The IDIP has been structured to meet contemporary equity design standards and enables the Company to offer selected
employees a range of different remuneration, incentive awards or employee share scheme interests.
The flexible design accommodates current and future needs with seven possible award structures available. The Company
has currently offered five of these, Performance Rights, Options, Service Rights, Deferred Shares and Exempt Shares
(general employees only), to Executive KMP and senior executives as depicted below.
IDP has offered a range of LTI Awards under the IDIP. These Awards are designed to assist in the motivation and retention
of senior management and other selected employees in line with contemporary market practice.
The vesting conditions are designed to achieve the long term objectives of the Company as identified by the Board at the
time of granting and the individual LTI awards have included some of the following criteria:
› Achievement of forecast or target financial performance measures, including:
• Earnings per share compound annual growth;
• Total shareholder return (TSR) compound annual growth; or
• IDP comparative ranking of TSR against the component companies in the ASX300 Discretionary Index or other relevant
selected comparator group.
The vesting conditions also include continuous service over the three year LTI period to promote talent retention.
The relevant performance conditions and the hurdle rates are reviewed, updated and approved annually.
The Board believes that the specific LTI vesting conditions will ensure the alignment of KMP’s awards with shareholder
returns. As at 30 June 2020, Executive KMP participate in the following Awards under the IDIP:
› the FY18 Award;
› the FY19 Award;
› the FY20 Award; and
› Deferred STI grant.
LTI Award Performance Grant Grant date Exercise Vesting conditions Vesting
rights/options date fair value price date
awards ($) ($)
FY18 Award Performance 15-Sep-17 5.45 0.00 EPS target CAGR over the period 31-Aug-20
— Tranche 1 Rights 1 July 2017 to 30 June 20201
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
FY18 Award Performance 15-Sep-17 4.07 0.00 Ranking in TSR against the 31-Aug-20
— Tranche 2 Rights component companies in the
ASX300 Discretionary Index from
grant date to 30 June 20202
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
FY19 Award Performance 27-Sep-18 9.67 0.00 EPS target CAGR over the period 31-Aug-21
— Tranche 1 Rights 1 July 2018 to 30 June 20213
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
FY19 Award Performance 27-Sep-18 6.30 0.00 Ranking in TSR against the 31-Aug-21
— Tranche 2 Rights component companies in the
ASX300 Discretionary Index from
grant date to 30 June 20214
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
FY20 Award Performance 1-Oct-19 15.17 0.00 EPS target CAGR over the period 31-Aug-22
— Tranche 1 Rights 1 July 2019 to 30 June 20225
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
FY20 Award Performance 1-Oct-19 7.79 0.00 Ranking in TSR against the 31-Aug-22
— Tranche 2 Rights component companies in a
selected ‘peer’ group of forty
(40) ASX listed companies of a
similar size (based on Market
Capitalisation) over the period
period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 20226
Continuous employment with IDP
until Vesting Date
1. The base EPS has been set at FY17 EPS of 16.58 cents per share. 50% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 12% is
achieved. 100% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 14% is achieved. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between
12% and 14%.
2. 50% of performance rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component companies in the ASX 300 Discretionary
Index of greater or equal to 50th percentile. 100% of performance rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component
companies in the ASX 300 Discretionary Index of greater or equal to 75th percentile. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between 50th percentile
and 75th percentile achievement.
3. The base EPS has been set at FY18 EPS of 20.23 cents per share. 50% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 12% is
achieved. 100% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 14% is achieved. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between
12% and 14%.
4. 50% of performance rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component companies in the ASX 300 Discretionary
Index of greater or equal to 50th percentile. 100% of performance rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component
companies in the ASX 300 Discretionary Index of greater or equal to 75th percentile. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between 50th percentile
and 75th percentile achievement.
5. The base EPS has been set at FY19 EPS of 26.3 cents per share. 50% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 15% is
achieved. 100% of performance rights available will vest if an EPS CAGR of at least 17.5% is achieved. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between
15% and 17.5%.
6. 50% of performance rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component companies in a selected ‘peer’ group of
forty (40) ASX listed companies of a similar size (based on Market Capitalisation) of greater or equal to 50th percentile. 100% of performance
rights available will vest if IDP achieves a ranking in TSR against the component companies in a selected ‘peer’ group of forty (40) ASX listed
companies of a similar size (based on Market Capitalisation) of greater or equal to 75th percentile. Vesting will be on a pro rata basis between
50th percentile and 75th percentile achievement.
Termination benefits
The remuneration and other terms of employment are covered in a formal employment contract. The employment
contracts include provisions requiring a minimum notice period by both the Executive and IDP Education. If either party
provides notice, the Company may make a payment in lieu of notice.
For all Executive KMP, in the event of serious misconduct or other circumstances warranting summary dismissal, notice
is not required.
The minimum notice period for each Executive KMP are set out in the below table.
Executive KMP Contract type Notice period by Notice period by Redundancy Payment
Executive IDP Education
Andrew Barkla Ongoing 3 months 9 months If terminated by reason of redundancy,
5 weeks notice and 34 weeks severance
Murray Walton Ongoing 3 months 3 months General redundancy terms apply as
mandated by the Fair Work Act 2009
Warwick Freeland Ongoing 13 weeks 26 weeks General redundancy terms apply as
mandated by the Fair Work Act 2009
Harmeet Pental Ongoing 6 months 6 months General retrenchment provisions apply
in accordance with Ministry of
Manpower (Singapore) requirements
Clawback provisions
The Board approved an executive remuneration malus and clawback policy in relation to performance based remuneration
on 21 August 2017. No circumstances have arisen during the current year that have required application of this policy.
The relationship between the Executive KMP at-risk remuneration and IDP Education’s performance can be demonstrated
through the STI performance criteria, their weighting and the outcome achieved for FY20.
Consolidated EBIT was adversely impacted by COVID-19. It is difficult to quantify the exact impact. Management’s
response to the pandemic was exceptional. Apart from trying to maintain a business as usual approach as far as
practicable, significant effort was made to control costs. About $35m in savings were achieved through remuneration
reductions, bonus reduction, rental relief, marketing, travel, consulting fees and other sundry savings. These savings
enabled IDP to achieve an earnings result similar to FY19. A small amount of various Government subsidies were also
received, where eligible.
The Board is particularly delighted that the Company and the executive team have delivered these results in a year
which presented many challenges to the business due to COVID-19 and the resultant temporary changes to international
mobility. The outcomes reflect actual results, no discretion has been exercised in determining these payments.
The table below provides a summary of STI payments achieved for the FY20 performance year:
1. STI amounts indicated to have been achieved in respect of the year ended 30 June 2020 are subject to annual review and only payable
subsequent to 30 June 2020 upon ratification and recommendation by the Remuneration Committee and approval by the Board.
2. With the exception noted in footnote 3 and 4, all STI amounts will be paid in cash.
3. An STI amount of $291,734 satisfied through a grant of service rights issued under the IDIP. The service rights are subject to a vesting condition
that the CEO remains employed for a further 12 months from the end of the financial year.
4. An STI amount of $108,832 satisfied through a grant of service rights issued under the IDIP. The service rights are subject to a vesting condition
that the COO remains employed for a further 12 months from the end of the financial year.
Without the impact of COVID-19 the Board believes the results for FY20 would have been well above expectations. While
COVID-19 has impacted on shareholders adversely we believe executives have also been adversely impacted by reduced
remuneration, lower STI payments than would otherwise apply and the lower share price impact on both their LTI awards,
performance expectations and unvested awards.
After deep contemplation the Board believes that no ‘special’ adjustment is required to these reward outcomes and that
the results fairly reflect remuneration and performance outcomes, all things considered.
Award EPS CAGR Vesting Date Estimated % to vest TSR relative Vesting Date Estimated % to vest
FY18 LTI 31 August 2020 100% 31 August 2020 100%
FY19 LTI 31 August 2021 Uncertain 31 August 2021 Uncertain
FY20 LTI 31 August 2022 Uncertain 31 August 2022 Uncertain
The EPS CAGR for the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2019 was 18.1% and 17.1% for the period from 1 July 2017 to 30 June
2020. It is not appropriate to provide further guidance on the likelihood of achievement of future EPS hurdles at this time.
We believe the EPS CAGR component of LTI awards provides a very strong correlation between IDP’s performance and
Executive KMP remuneration outcomes.
IDP’s TSR performance relative to the component companies in the ASX/S&P300 Discretionary Index also reflects IDP’s
outperformance as it has consistently achieved top quartile performance over an extended period. Accordingly, the Board
believes the reward outcomes for executives of a series of years are in alignment with company performance.
The following table provides a summary of critical performance metrics showing IDP Education’s financial performance for
FY20 and the four years prior.
Measure FY20 FY19 FY18 FY17 FY16
Revenue ($000) 587,106 598,136 487,155 394,187 361,636
% change from previous year -1.84% 22.78% 23.58% 9.00% 16.71%
Earnings Before Interest and Taxation ($000) 107,761 97,116 75,924 61,224 53,664
% change from previous year 10.96% 27.91% 24.01% 14.09% 18.86%
Net Profit after Taxation ($000) 67,809 66,311 51,481 41,511 39,914
% change from previous year 2.26% 28.81% 24.02% 4.00% 26.81%
Basic Earnings per Share (cents per share) 26.14 26.26 20.59 16.58 15.95
% change from previous year -0.46% 27.54% 24.18% 3.95% 26.79%
3 year Compound Annual Growth Rate (Conventional) 16.39% 18.08% 17.85% 14.04% 23.49%
Diluted Earnings per Share (cents per share) 26.09 26.09 20.14 16.20 15.60
% change from previous year 0% 29.54% 24.32% 3.85% 25.00%
Dividend (cents per share) 24.00 18.50 14.00 12.50 19.18
% change from previous year 29.73% 32.14% 12% -34.83% 23.11%
Share Price as at 30 June ($) 15.49 17.66 10.58 5.09 4.12
Average STI payout as a % at-target for eligible KMPs 65.1% 112.3% 122.5% 119.5% 94.3%
Despite an extremely disruptive last quarter the momentum IDP had created in the first three quarters combined with
judicious cost savings in Q4 IDP was able to achieve a small increase in NPAT. EPS was slightly down as a result of the
capital raising in Q4. Dividend per share increased by nearly 30%. While all the key financial metrics were down on
FY20 budgets the results reflect a very strong underlying performance.
The component of LTI awards linked to TSR relative performance is a less reliable measure of performance. Because this
measure requires a calculation of all the component companies in the XDKAI or specific comparator group the exact
performance can only be assessed at the final test date (30th June each year). An indicative only result can be shown
by comparing IDP’s TSR relative to the XDKAI as set out in the chart below.
As indicated, IDP has consistently outperformed the XDKAI. Since listing IDP has achieved an approximate 492% TSR,
whereas the XDKAI has returned 48%. This means shareholder returns for IDP shareholders have enjoyed TSR performance
in excess of ten times this representative comparator index over the relevant period.
Accordingly, based on early indications, a 100% vesting of the TSR component of the LTI awards are expected although
subject to independent verification and testing at the relevant test dates.
26 Mar 17
26 May 17
26 Jul 17
26 Sep 17
26 Nov 17
26 Nov 15
26 Jan 16
26 Mar 16
26 May 16
26 Jul 16
26 Sep 16
26 Nov 16
26 Jan 18
26 Mar 18
26 May 18
26 Jul 18
26 Sep 18
26 Nov 18
26 Jan 19
26 Mar 19
26 May 19
26 Jul 19
26 Sep 19
26 Nov 19
26 Jan 20
26 Mar 20
26 May 20
IEL XDKAI
1. Salary changes reflect increases effective from 1 July 2019 offset by a 20% reduction from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020.
2. Short-term STI includes both cash and service rights expected to be paid/vest in future periods as a result of FY18 and FY19 STI outcomes.
3. Other short term benefits for COO represent travel allowance and medical insurance for this offshore position.
4. Non-monetary benefits for COO represent car benefit and housing benefit for this offshore position.
5. Long-Term benefits represents long service leave accrued but untaken during the year.
6. Equity based benefits represent benefits issued under the LTI. It represents statutory accounting expenses measured under AASB 2, which are
based on the grant date fair value, amortised on a straight line basis over the vesting period. Refer to share based payments accounting policy
(note 23) for further details.
7. The ‘Other’ amount is a 10 year service award paid under IDP’s Global Service Recognition policy, equivalent to one week’s salary.
1. To date all LTI awards granted since listing have met their performance conditions and have vested.
1. These amounts represent ordinary shares purchased or sold directly or indirectly by the Executive KMP during the financial year.
These transactions have no connection with the roles and responsibilities as employees of the Group.
Under the Constitution, the Directors decide the total amount paid to all Directors as remuneration for their services as
a Director. However, under the ASX Listing Rules, the total amount paid to all Directors for their services must not exceed
in aggregate in any financial year the amount fixed by the Company in a general meeting. This amount, being the fee pool
limit, has been fixed at $1,500,000 per financial year.
Each Non-executive Director’s total remuneration package may be comprised of the following elements:
› Base fee
› Committee fee
No retirement benefits are payable to Non-executive Directors other than statutory superannuation entitlements.
The below table provides further details relating to the components of the Non-executive Director remuneration.
Non-executive Director remuneration was last increased effective March 2018 based on an independent assessment of
Board remuneration of comparable companies. This increase represents the only increase in fees since the company listed
in November 2017. The current Non-executive Director remuneration fee structure is shown in the following table:
$ per annum
Base Fee
Chair 350,000
Non-executive Director 150,000
Committee Chair Fees
Audit and Risk Committee 20,000
Nomination Committee 10,000
Remuneration Committee 10,000
Committee Member Fees
Audit and Risk Committee 10,000
Nomination Committee 10,000
Remuneration Committee 10,000
1. The Chair and Directors fees were set upon listing to reflect relevant market benchmarks for an ASX listed entity of similar size and complexity
and as assessed independently. Directors fees were last increased effective 1 March 2018 to align with market and reflects the increased scale
and complexity of IDP and the commensurate increase in time commitment by the Board. In FY20 Directors agreed to a 20% reduction in fees
payable for the period 1 April to 30 June in light of impact of COVID-19 on business performance and cash flow.
* There was an error in Peter Polson’s ordinary share holdings as at 30 June 2019, which has been corrected and restated in the table above.
1. These amounts represent ordinary shares purchased or sold directly or indirectly by the Non-executive Directors during the financial year.
These transactions have no connection with the roles and responsibilities as Non-executive Directors of the Group.
Peter Polson Andrew Barkla
Chairman Managing Director
Melbourne
19 August 2020
19 August 2020
Yours sincerely
Genevra Cavallo
Partner
Chartered Accountants
Earnings per share for profit attributable to ordinary equity holders Notes 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
Basic earnings per share (cents per share) 7 26.14 26.26
Diluted earnings per share (cents per share) 7 26.09 26.09
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
The Group has reclassified the presentation of treasury shares issued to employees from Issued capital to Share based
payments reserve. The reclassification is to better align the vested treasury shares to the underlying Share based payments
reserve. The equity section as at 30 June 2019 is reclassified as above. The reclassification has no impact on net profit,
net assets or cash flows of the Group.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Equity
attrib-
Foreign utable to
Cash currency Share owners Non-
flow trans- based of IDP contro-
Issued hedge lation payments Retained Education lling
capital reserve reserve reserve earnings Limited interests Total
Note $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
As at 30 June 2018 9,734 240 50 9,628 81,614 101,266 20 101,286
Effect of adoption of new
accounting standards(i)(ii) - - - - 7,490 7,490 - 7,490
Reclassification of
treasury shares issued
to the employees (iii) 8,024 - - (8,024) - - - -
As at 1 July 2018 17,758 240 50 1,604 89,104 108,756 20 108,776
Change in the fair value
of cash flow hedges,
net of income tax - (802) - - - (802) - (802)
Exchange differences
arising on translating
the foreign operations - - 1,962 - - 1,962 (16) 1,946
Profit for the year - - - - 66,627 66,627 (316) 66,311
Total comprehensive
income for the year - (802) 1,962 - 66,627 67,787 (332) 67,455
Issue of new shares 21.1 4,939 - - - - 4,939 - 4,939
Acquisition of treasury
shares 21.2 (1,930) - - - - (1,930) - (1,930)
Share-based payments - - - 21,779 - 21,779 - 21,779
Issue of treasury shares
to employees 10,044 - - (10,044) - - - -
Dividends paid 6 - - - - (47,072) (47,072) - (47,072)
As at 30 June 2019 30,811 (562) 2,012 13,339 108,659 154,259 (312) 153,947
(i) During the year ended 30 June 2019, the Group adopted AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers on a modified retrospective basis.
This resulted in an increase of $7.756 million to retained profits as at 1 July 2018, being the cumulative effect on initial application of the standard.
(ii) During the year ended 30 June 2019, the Group adopted AASB 9 Financial Instruments. This resulted in a charge of $0.266 million to retained profits
as at 1 July 2018, being the cumulative effect on initial application of the standard.
(iii) The Group has reclassified the presentation of treasury shares issued to employees from Issued capital to Share based payments reserve.
The reclassification is to better align the vested treasury shares to the underlying Share based payments reserve. The equity section as
at 30 June 2018 is reclassified as above. The reclassification has no impact on net profit, net assets or cash flows of the Group.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Equity
attrib-
Foreign utable to
Cash currency Share owners Non-
flow trans- based of IDP contro-
Issued hedge lation payments Retained Education lling
capital reserve reserve reserve earnings Limited interests Total
Note $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
As at 30 June 2019 12,743 (562) 2,012 31,407 108,659 154,259 (312) 153,947
Reclassification of
treasury shares issued
to the employees (i) 18,068 - - (18,068) - - - -
As at 1 July 2019 30,811 (562) 2,012 13,339 108,659 154,259 (312) 153,947
Change in the fair value
of cash flow hedges,
net of income tax - 373 - - - 373 - 373
Exchange differences
arising on translating
the foreign operations - - (3,444) - - (3,444) 29 (3,415)
Profit for the year - - - - 67,873 67,873 (64) 67,809
Total comprehensive
income for the year - 373 (3,444) - 67,873 64,802 (35) 64,767
Exercise of share options 21.1 612 612 612
Issue of new shares,
net of transaction costs 21.1 248,963 - - - - 248,963 - 248,963
Acquisition of treasury
shares 21.2 (17,940) - - - - (17,940) - (17,940)
Share-based payments
schemes including
tax effect - - - 3,638 - 3,638 - 3,638
Issue of treasury shares
to employees 8,513 - - (8,513) - - - -
Dividends paid/payable 6 - - - - (61,066) (61,066) - (61,066)
As at 30 June 2020 270,959 (189) (1,432) 8,464 115,466 393,268 (347) 392,921
(i) The Group has reclassified the presentation of treasury shares issued to employees from Issued capital to Share based payments reserve.
The reclassification is to better align the vested treasury shares to the underlying Share based payments reserve. The equity section as
at 30 June 2019 is reclassified as above. The reclassification has no impact on net profit, net assets or cash flows of the Group.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
(i) The Group has restated the 30 June 2019 receipts from customers and payment to suppliers and employees to include gross GST amount.
The restatement has no impact the net operating cash inflow of the Group.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
The financial statements are for the consolidated entity, consisting of IDP Education Limited (the Company) and its
controlled subsidiaries (the Group). IDP Education Limited is a for profit company limited by shares whose shares are
publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2020 were authorised for issue in accordance with
a resolution of the Directors on 19 August 2020.
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year except as noted. When the
presentation or classification of items in the financial report is amended, comparative amounts are also reclassified.
The performance of IDP Education in the first nine months of FY20 was strong with revenue growth of 19.2% compared
to the same period in FY19 representing a continuation of the strong organic growth the company has been experiencing
over the past eight years. However the financial impact of COVID-19 on the business was evident from the end of March
and revenue declined by 64% in the last quarter compared to the same period in FY19 leading to an overall decline in
revenue of 1.8% for the full year.
Despite the impacts from COVID-19, the Group has sufficient cash reserves to meet any obligations or liabilities as and
when they become due and payable.
New and revised Standards and amendments thereof and Interpretations effective for the current year that are relevant
to the Group include:
› AASB 16 Leases
› Interpretation 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments and AASB 2017-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards — Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatment
AASB 16 Leases
The Group has adopted the new lease accounting standard AASB 16 Leases from 1 July 2019. AASB 16 introduces significant
changes to lessee accounting by removing the classification of leases as either operating or finance leases as required by
AASB 117 and instead introduces a single lessee accounting model.
The Group has elected to apply the modified retrospective approach for leases. For leases, which were classified as
operating leases under AASB 117, the Group has recognised right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as at the transition
date (1 July 2019). The Group did not have any leases previously classified as finance leases on the adoption date.
The Group has elected to apply the recognition exemption for leases of low-value assets or short-term leases including
office equipment such as printers and other IT equipment for use by staff in its offices.
The effect on 1 July 2019 of the recognition of the new right-of-use assets and lease liabilities is disclosed below.
1 July 2019
$’000
Increase in right-of-use assets 82,736
Decrease in assets from de-recognition of prepaid rent (2,027)
Increase in lease liabilities — current (14,991)
Increase in lease liabilities — non-current (65,718)
Impact on retained earnings -
The reconciliation of non-cancellable operating lease commitments disclosed at 30 June 2019 to initial lease liabilities
recognised as at 1 July 2019 is set out below.
$’000
Operating lease commitments disclosed as at 30 Jun 2019 46,951
Adjustments as a result of a different treatment of extension and termination options 49,349
Short term and low value leases (11)
Discounting with incremental borrowing rate at the first application of AASB 16 (15,580)
Lease liabilities recognised as of 1 July 2019 80,709
In addition, at the date of authorisation of the financial statements no IASB Standards and IFRIC Interpretations were on
issue but not yet effective, but for which Australian equivalent Standards and Interpretations have not yet been issued.
The Directors of the Group do not anticipate that the adoption of above amendments will have a material impact in future
periods on the financial statements of the Group.
The Group re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes
to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Group obtains control over
the subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of
a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the
date the Group gains control until the date the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are identified separately from the Group’s equity therein. Those interests of non-
controlling shareholders that are present ownership interests entitling their holders to a proportionate share of net assets
upon liquidation may initially be measured at fair value or at the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the fair
value of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. The choice of measurement is made on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis.
Other non-controlling interests are initially measured at fair value. Subsequent to acquisition, the carrying amount of
non-controlling interests is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-controlling interests’ share
of subsequent changes in equity. Total comprehensive income is attributed to non-controlling interests even if this results
in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance.
Group consolidation
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars at the rate
of exchange prevailing at the reporting date and their statements of profit or loss are translated at exchange rates
prevailing at the dates of the transactions. The exchange differences arising on translation for consolidation purposes
are recognised in other comprehensive income. On disposal of a foreign operation, the component of other comprehensive
income relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in profit or loss.
Any goodwill arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation and any fair value adjustments to the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities arising on the acquisition are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation and translated
at the spot rate of exchange at the reporting date.
Financial Performance
2. Segment information
Basis of segmentation
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Chief
Operating Decision Maker in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. The Chief Operating
Decision Maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments,
has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer.
The Chief Operating Decision Maker determined that its operating segments comprise the geographic regions of:
› Asia — which includes Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Mauritius,
Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam;
› Australasia — which includes Australia, Fiji, New Zealand and New Caledonia; and
› Rest of World — which includes Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Ecuador, Egypt,
Germany, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Peru,
Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, the United Arab Emirates,
the United Kingdom and United States of America.
These geographic segments are based on the Group’s management reporting system and the way management views
the business.
The principal activities of each segment are provision of student placement services, International English Language
Testing (IELTS), digital marketing and event services and English language teaching services.
Service segment
The Group also uses a secondary segment which shows revenue and gross profit by service. Revenue by service segment
is disclosed in Note 3. Gross profit (i.e. revenue less direct costs) by service segment is shown below:
Revenue is measured based on the consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in a contract with a customer.
The Group recognises revenue when it transfers control of a service to a customer.
Under AASB 15, revenue recognition for each of the major revenue streams is as follows:
Disaggregation of revenue
The Group derives its revenue from the transfer of services over time and at a point in time in the following major services.
Accounting policy
IDP Education Limited is the head entity in a tax-consolidated group under Australian taxation law. As a result the
Company and Australian entities controlled by the Company are all subject to income tax through membership of the
tax-consolidated group. The consolidated current and deferred tax amounts for the tax-consolidated group are allocated
to the members of the tax-consolidated group using the ‘separate taxpayer within group’ approach, with deferred taxes
being allocated by reference to the carrying amounts in the financial statements of each member entity and the tax
values applying under tax consolidation. Current tax liabilities and assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused
tax losses and relevant tax credits arising from this allocation process are then accounted for as immediately assumed
by the head entity, as under Australian taxation law the head entity has the legal obligation (or right) to these amounts.
Entities within the tax-consolidated group have entered into a tax funding arrangement and a tax sharing agreement
with the head entity. Under the terms of the tax funding arrangement, the entities controlled by the Group have agreed
to pay an amount to or from the head entity equal to the tax liability or asset assumed by the head entity for that period
as noted above. Such amounts are reflected in amounts receivable from or payable to the head entity. Accordingly, the
amount arising under the tax funding arrangement for each period is equal to the tax liability or asset assumed by the
head entity for that period and no contribution from (or distribution to) equity participants arises in relation to income taxes.
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognised in the profit or loss except to
the extent it relates to items recognised directly in equity in which case it is recognised in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method providing for temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred
tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences:
(i) The initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination;
(ii) The initial recognition of goodwill; and
(iii) The initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction which at the time of the transaction affects neither
accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss).
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the
liability is settled or the asset realised, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted
by the end of the reporting period. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences
that would follow from the manner in which the Group expects, at the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the
carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be available against which
the temporary difference can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date and are reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
The income tax expense for the year can be reconciled to the accounting profit as follows.
2020
Temporary differences and tax losses.
The unrecognised tax losses will expire between 5 years and indefinite.
The final dividend of 7.5c per share for the financial year ended 30 June 2019 was paid on 26 September 2019.
The interim dividend of 16.5c per share for the financial year ended 30 June 2020 was declared on 12 February 2020
to shareholders registered on 6 March 2020. The payment was deferred to 24 September 2020.
6.2. Dividends proposed and not recognised at the end of the reporting period
IDP’s Board of Directors has decided not to declare a full year dividend.
Earnings used in calculating earnings per share 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$000 $000
Earnings used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share 67,873 66,627
Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
Weighted average number of shares used as denominator in calculating basic EPS 259,678,139 253,751,406
Weighted average of potential dilutive ordinary shares:
› options - 693,562
› performance rights 501,802 897,735
Weighted average number of shares used as denominator in calculating diluted EPS 260,179,941 255,342,703
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue is recognised as the
relevant performance obligations identified in a customer contract are satisfied. Refer to Note 3 for further details
of revenue recognition.
Where revenue recognised precedes billings it results in a contract asset as disclosed in Note 9 below, and where cash
amounts are received in advance of revenue recognition it results in a contract liability as disclosed in Note 16.
IDP’s credit terms are generally 30 to 60 days from the date of invoice. As such, the carrying amount of receivables
approximates their fair value.
30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$’000 $’000
Trade receivables 65,339 64,819
Credit loss allowance (1,527) (1,416)
63,812 63,403
Other receivables 4,595 5,155
68,407 68,558
Expected credit losses are measured by grouping trade receivables and contract assets based on shared credit
risk characteristics. The contract assets relate to unbilled work in progress and have substantially the same risk
characteristics as the trade receivables for the same types of contracts.
A provision allowance is determined based on historic credit loss rates for each group of customers, adjusted for any
material expected changes to the customers’ future credit risk.
Amounts relating to contract assets are balances where revenue recognised precedes billings under customer contracts.
The Group recognised contract assets for any performance obligations satisfied. Any amount previously recognised
as contract assets is reclassified to trade receivables at the point at which it is invoiced to the customer.
Capitalised development costs arising from the development phase of an internal project are recognised if, and only if,
all of the following have been demonstrated:
› the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use;
› the intention to complete the intangible asset and use it;
› the ability to use the intangible asset;
› the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
› the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and the
intangible asset; and
› the ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
The amount recognised is the sum of the expenditure incurred from the date when the project development first meets the
recognition criteria listed above. Where above criteria is not met, development expenditure is recognised in profit or loss
in the period in which it is incurred.
30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$’000 $’000
Balance at beginning of the year 3,921 5,683
Additions 8,398 8,019
Transfers to property, plant and equipment (277) -
Transfers to intangible assets (6,059) (9,781)
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences (39) -
Balance at end of the year 5,944 3,921
Impairment
The carrying values of property, plant and equipment are reviewed annually for indications of impairment to ensure
they are not in excess of the recoverable amount for these assets. An impairment loss is recognised to the extent that
the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount.
The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each reporting period,
with the effect of any changes in estimate accounted for on a prospective basis.
The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to
the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The estimated useful lives
of right-of-use assets are determined on the same basis as those of property, plant and equipment. In addition, the
right-of-use assets are periodically reduced by impairment losses in accordance with AASB 136 Impairment of Assets,
if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurement of the lease liability.
Cost Office
buildings
$’000
Balance at 30 June 2019 -
Initial adoption of AASB 16 on 1 July 2019 82,736
Additions 24,284
Disposal (723)
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences (3,881)
Balance at 30 June 2020 102,416
Accumulated depreciation
Balance at 30 June 2019 -
Depreciation for the period 21,148
Disposal (531)
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences (799)
Balance at 30 June 2020 19,818
Net Book Value
At 30 June 2019 -
At 30 June 2020 82,598
Amounts recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$’000 $’000
Depreciation expenses on right-of-use assets 21,148 -
Interest expenses on lease liabilities 4,487 -
Expenses relating to short term or low value leases 870 -
Occupancy expenses (1) 8,064 25,344
A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash flows largely independent of cash flows of other
groups of assets. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets are allocated to CGU or group of CGUs which are
no larger than one of the Group’s reportable segments.
The recoverable amounts of the CGU or group of CGUs to which the assets have been allocated have been determined
based on the value in use calculations. These calculations are performed based on cash flow projections and other
supplementary information which, given their forward looking nature, require the adoption of assumptions and estimates.
The key assumptions and estimates utilised in management’s assessments relate primarily to:
› Three years cash flow forecasts sourced from internal budgets and management forecasts;
› Terminal value growth rates applied to the period beyond the three year cash flow forecasts; and
› Post-tax discount rates, used to discount the cash flows to present value.
Each of these assumptions and estimates is based on a “best estimate” at the time of performing the valuation. However,
increase in discount rates or changes in other key assumptions, such as operating conditions or financial performance,
may cause the carrying value of CGU or group of CGUs to exceed their recoverable amount.
Accounting policy
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired
in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are
carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Internally generated intangibles,
excluding capitalised development costs, are not capitalised and the related expenditure is reflected in profit or loss in
the period in which the expenditure is incurred.
The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment whenever there
is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an
intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected
useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to
modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates and
adjusted on a prospective basis. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the
statement of profit or loss as expenses. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised but are tested
for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired
and is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
Accumulated amortisation
Balance at 1 July 2018 (25,405) (2,493) (218) (1,385) (2,587) - - (32,088)
Amortisation for the year (7,325) - - - - - - (7,325)
Amortisation of intangible
assets generated from
business combinations - - (71) (969) (1,849) - - (2,889)
Disposals 7 - - - - - - 7
Effect of foreign currency
exchange differences - - - (20) (39) - - (59)
Balance at 30 June 2019 (32,723) (2,493) (289) (2,374) (4,475) - - (42,354)
Amortisation for the year (9,137) - - - - - - (9,137)
Amortisation of intangible
assets generated from
business combinations - - (71) (1,638) (1,487) - - (3,196)
Disposals 21,865 2,493 - - - - - 24,358
Effect of foreign currency
exchange differences (93) - - 58 93 - - 58
Balance at 30 June 2020 (20,088) - (360) (3,954) (5,869) - - (30,271)
Net Book Value
At 30 June 2019 29,589 - 14,992 12,002 2,837 39,191 35,200 133,811
At 30 June 2020 28,005 - 14,796 10,298 1,379 38,963 35,200 128,641
Customer relationships
Customer relationships are separately identifiable intangible assets arising from business combinations and are
recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Customer relationships are amortised between 8 and 19 years.
Contracts of English language testing and goodwill are not amortised but are tested for impairment annually, or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, and is carried at cost less accumulated
impairment losses. Contracts of English language testing and goodwill are allocated to CGUs for the purpose of impairment
testing. The allocation is made to those CGUs or group of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the Contracts for English
language testing and business combination in which the goodwill arose.
The Group tests whether goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are subject to any impairment annually
or whenever an impairment indictor is present. The recoverable amount is based on a value in use calculation which
uses discounted cash flow projections based on three years internal budgets and management forecasts. Cash flow
projections during the forecast period are based on management’s best estimate of volume growth, expenses, inflation
and foreign exchange rates throughout the period.
The Group is actively managing the impacts and risks arising from COVID-19 on its operations and to date there are no
known significant long-term structural changes that affect the future cash flows of the CGUs. As part of it COVID-19
response, the Group is closely monitoring its budgets and forecasts based on the best information available. These include
but are not limited to international travel restrictions, government-imposed lockdowns, social distancing measures and
institutions reduced marketing spend.
As a result, as at 30 June 2020 and 2019, the recoverable amount supports the carrying amount and no impairment has
been recognised. For UK — Digital marketing CGU, the recoverable amount supporting the carrying amount is dependent
on the achievement of 80% of next three years forecast EBITDA. No other reasonably possible changes in significant
assumptions would give rise to an impairment of Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and goodwill.
(1) GST receivables represents GST paid in advance in foreign jurisdictions, which are to be refunded to the Group. The processing of such refunds
is expected to take longer than 12 months.
As at 30 June 2020 and 2019, the carrying value of trade and other payables approximated their fair value.
(1) The contract liabilities arise in respect to IELTS fees paid by candidates in advance of the IELTS testing month.
(2) The contract liabilities arise as a result of fees paid by students in advance of the student placement services.
(3) The contract liabilities arise as a result of exhibition fees paid by participants in advance of the event date.
(4) The contract liabilities arise as a result of tuition fees paid by participants in advance of the tuition date.
(5) The contract liabilities arise as a result of digital marketing contracts fees paid by customers in advance of service delivery.
The brought-forward contract liabilities from 30 June 2019 ($34.184m) have been fully recognised in the current reporting
period revenue.
17. Provisions
Accounting policy
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is
probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable
estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects,
when appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the
passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
Employee benefits
A liability is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries and long service leave when
it is probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably.
Provision is made for the Group’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to balance
date. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts expected
to be paid when the liability is settled, plus related on-costs. Employee benefits payable later than one year have been
measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made for those benefits.
(i) The cash flows from bank loans make up the net amount of proceeds from borrowings and repayments of borrowings in the statement
of cash flows.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following:
› Fixed payments, including in substance fixed payments less any lease incentives receivables;
› Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the
commencement rate;
› Amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee;
› The exercise price under a purchase option that the Group is reasonably certain to exercise;
› Lease payments in an optional renewal period if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option; and
› Payment of penalties for early termination of a lease unless the Group is reasonably certain not to terminate early
The lease liability is presented as a separate line in the consolidated statement of financial position.
The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It will be remeasured when there
is a change in index or rate for future lease payments, a change in the Group’s estimated amount payable under
a residue value guarantee or changes in the Group’s assessment of probabilities of exercising a purchase, extension
or termination option.
When the lease liability is remeasured, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use
asset or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero. The Group
did not make any such adjustment during the period presented.
The Group does not face a significant liquidity risk with regard to its lease liabilities.
The reconciliation of profit for the year after tax to net cash flows from operating activities is as follows:
During FY20, 1,040,075 treasury shares were transferred to employees under the performance rights plans (Note 23.2).
These shares therefore ceased to be held as treasury shares after these dates.
During FY20, IDP Education Employee Share Scheme Trust acquired 1,051,122 shares (at an average price of $17.07 per share)
to be held in the Trust for the benefit of IDP group employees who are participants in the IDP Education Employee
Incentive Plan.
As at 30 June 2020, there were 630,387 treasury shares ($11.005m) held in the Trust. These shares will be transferred to
eligible employees under the Performance Rights plan once the vesting conditions are met.
Financial liabilities
Borrowings 59,831 60,478
Lease liabilities 84,563 -
Fair value through profit or loss
Contingent consideration - 174
Derivative financial instruments
Foreign exchange forward/option contracts 929 2,028
Trade and other payables 57,318 93,219
Dividends payable 41,983 -
Accounting policy
Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting.
Any gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives are taken directly to profit or loss, except for the
effective portion of cash flow hedges, which is recognised in other comprehensive income (OCI) and later reclassified to
profit or loss when the hedged item affects profit or loss.
The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in OCI in the cash flow hedge reserve,
while any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the statement of profit or loss as other operating expenses.
The Group uses forward currency contracts and options as hedges of its exposure to foreign currency risk in forecast
transactions and firm commitments. The ineffective portion relating to foreign currency contracts is recognised in profit
or loss.
Amounts recognised as OCI are transferred to profit or loss when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss, such as
when the hedged financial income or financial expense is recognised or when a forecast transaction occurs.
If the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised without replacement or rollover (as part of the hedging
strategy), or if its designation as a hedge is revoked, or when the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting,
any cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI remains separately in equity until the forecast transaction occurs
or the foreign currency firm commitment is met.
The Group uses a foreign currency loan as a hedge of its exposure to foreign exchange risk on its investments in foreign
subsidiaries. The loan at 30 June 2020 was a borrowing of GBP 30.906m which has been designated as a hedge of the net
investment in the subsidiary in UK. This borrowing is being used to hedge the Group’s exposure to the GBP foreign exchange
risk on this investment. Gains or losses on the retranslation of this borrowing are transferred to OCI to offset any gains or
losses on translation of the net investment in the subsidiary. There is no ineffectiveness in the year ended 30 June 2020.
The Group seeks to minimise the effects of these risks by using derivative financial instruments to hedge risk exposures.
The use of financial derivatives is governed by the Group’s policies approved by the Board of Directors, which provide
written principles on foreign exchange risk, the use of financial derivatives and the investment of excess liquidity.
Compliance with policies and exposure limits is reviewed by the internal auditors on a continuous basis. The Group
does not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes.
The Group’s Corporate Treasury function reports at least quarterly to the Group’s Audit and Risk Committee, an
independent body that monitors risks and policies implemented to mitigate risk exposures.
Market risk
Foreign currency risk management
The Group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign
exchange risk arises when future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities are denominated in a
currency that is not the Group’s functional currency. Predominantly these foreign currencies include British Pounds (GBP),
Indian Rupee (INR) and Chinese Yuan (CNY).
The Company’s current policy is to enter into hedges during the current year covering up to 25% each quarter of the
foreign currency exchange rate exposure of the following financial year’s forecast cash operating expenses (net of any
forecast cash receipts). The balance of the hedge program is completed when the Board approves the Company’s budget
and cash flow forecasts for the following financial year (which is prior to the commencement of that financial year).
COVID-19 impacts
In late February 2020, IDP reduced forecast hedging volumes in response to potential volatility arising from COVID-19
financial impacts. This proactive approach was implemented to ensure IDP is not over hedged across the FY21 financial
year. Portfolio adjustments and further hedging can be initiated in future to ensure IDP’s hedging portfolio is in line with
highly probable forecast transactions.
Sell INR
0 to 3 months 566,000 283,991 136 (419)
3 to 6 months - 335,715 - (409)
6 months to 1 year - 666,678 - (560)
Buy CNY
0 to 3 months 15,000 15,700 (11) 95
3 to 6 months 15,000 15,700 (10) 177
6 months to 1 year 24,000 31,400 (34) 198
Effect on Effect on
profit and equity
loss $’000
$’000
USD
2020 -10% 262 262
2019 -10% 1,197 1,197
CNY
2020 -10% (525) 339
2019 -10% (468) (1,481)
GBP
2020 -10% 1,852 440
2019 -10% 615 523
INR
2020 -10% (2,324) (2,229)
2019 -10% (674) (2,740)
CAD
2020 -10% 1,469 1,137
2019 -10% 502 (175)
Other currencies
2020 -10% (373) (312)
2019 -10% 896 1,020
At 30 June 2020, the Group was exposed to the variable interest rate loans of $60.2 m (2019: $60.7m).
The assumed movement in basis points for the interest rate sensitivity analysis is based on the currently observable
market environment.
The Group has a policy which describes the manner in which cash balances will be invested. The investment policy is to
ensure sufficient flexibility to capture investment opportunities as they may occur, yet maintain reasonable parameters
in the execution of the investment program.
The following table summarises the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted
payments. The table has been drawn up based on the net cash inflows and outflows on derivative instruments that settle
on a net basis and the undiscounted gross inflows and outflows on those derivatives that require gross settlement.
30 June 2019
Trade and other payables 93,219 - - 93,219 93,219
Interest-bearing borrowings 946 62,134 - 63,080 60,478
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss 174 - - 174 174
Foreign exchange forward contracts 2,028 - - 2,028 2,028
96,367 62,134 - 158,501 155,899
The Group’s customer base comprises Australia, UK, US, Canada and New Zealand universities and institutions and IELTS
test centres. Credit risk assessments are conducted on new and renegotiated contracts to evaluate each customer’s
creditworthiness. Management considers the Group’s credit risk is low due to the industry characteristic of major customers
and the diverse customer base.
Management also considers many factors that influence the credit risk of its customer base including the industry default
risk and country in which customers operate in. Management closely monitors the economic and political environment in
geographical areas to limit the exposure to particular volatility. The Group’s activities are increasingly geographically
spread reducing the credit risk associated with one particular market or region.
Carrying value of financial assets represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk because the financial assets are
not offset by the financial liabilities as they do not meet the net presentation requirements under AASB 132 and the Group
does not have agreements in place to enable offset as a result of credit event.
The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available
to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within
the fair value hierarchy, described as follows
› Level 1 — Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
› Level 2 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement
is directly or indirectly observable; and
› Level 3 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement
is unobservable.
Fair value of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
Financial Fair value Fair value as at Fair value as at Valuation Significant Relationship of
assets/ hierarchy 30 June 2020 30 June 2019 techniques and key unobservable unobservable
financial $’000 $’000 inputs inputs inputs to fair
liabilities value
Foreign Level 2 Assets: 461 Assets: 1,335 Discounted cash N/A N/A
currency flow. Future cash
forward Liabilities: 929 Liabilities: 2,028 flows are estimated
and options based on forward
contracts exchange rates
(from observable
forward exchange
rates at the end of
the reporting period)
and contract forward
rates, discounted at a
rate that reflects the
credit risk of various
counterparties.
Contingent Level 3 Nil 174 Discounted cash WACC A slight decrease
consideration flow method was or increase in
in business used to capture the Probability the discount rate
combinations/ present value of of meeting used and/or KPIs
investment in the expected future contingent probability in
associate economic benefits consideration isolation would
that will flow out KPIs not result in
of the Group arising a significant
from the contingent change in the
consideration. fair value.
Great British Pound Facility A: Acquisition funding unsecured Cash Advance loan facility for acquisition
£30,906,112 of UK subsidiaries
Australian Dollar Facility B: Unsecured Cash advance facility to support both general corporate
$25,000,000 purposes and working capital requirements of the Group
Australian Dollar Facility C: Acquisition funding unsecured Cash Advance loan facility for investment
$5,000,000 in HCP Ltd
Australian Dollar Facility F: Unsecured Cash advance facility to support both general corporate
$150,000,000 purposes and working capital requirements of the Group
The Company has complied with all bank lending requirements during the year and at the date of this report.
As at 30 June 2020, the net leverage ratio was nil (2019: 0.04). The ratio is calculated as Net Debt to Earnings before
Interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) as defined by the loan covenants.
Other notes
23. Share-based payments
Critical accounting estimates and assumptions
Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determination of the most appropriate valuation
model, which depends on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determination of the most
appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the share option or performance right, volatility
and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value for
share-based payment transactions are disclosed in Note 23.3 below.
Accounting policy
Share-based compensation benefits are provided to key management personnel (KMP) and certain employees via
long-term incentive (LTI) performance rights and options plans.
The fair value of equity-settled rights and options granted under the plans is recognised as an employee benefit expense
over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the rights and options with a corresponding
increase in equity. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of the rights and options
granted, which includes any market performance conditions and the impact of any non-vesting conditions but excludes
the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included
in assumptions about the number of rights and options that are expected to vest which are revised at the end of each
reporting period. The impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, is recognised in the consolidated statement
of profit or loss, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
The fair value is measured at grant date and the expense recognised over the life of the plan. The fair value of performance
rights and options is independently determined using Monte Carlo Simulation or similar pricing model that takes into
account the exercise price, the term of the plan, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price
volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
The expected price volatility is based on the historic volatility (based on the remaining life of the plans), adjusted for
any expected changes to future volatility due to publicly available information.
Details of the current performance rights and options plans are summarised in the table below.
Performance rights/ No. of Grant date Grant date Exercise Vesting conditions Vesting
options awards performance fair value price date
rights/
Options
CEO incentive award 295,000 17-Aug-15 0.51 1.44 Total shareholder 31-Aug-18 (1)
return CAGR
FY18 LTI award 171,173 15-Sep-17 5.45 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-20
— tranche 1
FY18 LTI award 171,168 15-Sep-17 4.07 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-20
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY18 IDP plan award 130,018 15-Sep-17 5.45 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-20
— tranche 1
FY18 IDP plan award 130,003 15-Sep-17 4.07 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-20
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY19 LTI award 87,107 27-Sep-18 9.67 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-21
— tranche 1
FY19 LTI award 87,103 27-Sep-18 6.30 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-21
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY19 IDP plan award 80,100 27-Sep-18 9.67 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-21
— tranche 1
FY19 IDP plan award 80,080 27-Sep-18 6.30 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-21
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY20 LTI award 67,546 1-Oct-19 15.17 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-22
— tranche 1
FY20 LTI award 67,540 1-Oct-19 7.79 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-22
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY20 IDP plan award 55,384 1-Oct-19 15.17 N/A EPS target CAGR 31-Aug-22
— tranche 1
FY20 IDP plan award 55,362 1-Oct-19 7.79 N/A Total shareholder 31-Aug-22
— tranche 2 return hurdle
FY19 Deferred STI 15,466 1-Oct-19 15.58 N/A Service condition 1-Jul-20
(1) The expiry date of the CEO incentive award options is 12 October 2020.
2020
Number of options or rights
Grant Vesting Exercise Opening Granted Exercised Forfeited Closing Vested
date period price balance during during during balance and
(years) the year the year the year exercis-
able at
balance
date
Options plan
CEO incentive
award options (1) 17-Aug-15 3.0 $1.44 720,000 - (425,000) - 295,000 295,000
Total Options 720,000 - (425,000) - 295,000 295,000
Performance
right plans
FY17 LTI 14-Sep-16 3.0 $0.00 369,247 - (369,247) - - -
FY17 IDP plan award 14-Sep-16 3.0 $0.00 223,357 - (223,357) - - -
FY18 LTI 15-Sep-17 3.0 $0.00 371,509 - - (29,168) 342,341 -
FY18 IDP plan award 15-Sep-17 3.0 $0.00 269,295 - - (9,274) 260,021 -
FY19 LTI 27-Sep-18 3.0 $0.00 188,205 - - (13,995) 174,210 -
FY19 IDP plan award 27-Sep-18 3.0 $0.00 164,463 - - (4,283) 160,180 -
FY18 deferred STI 27-Sep-18 1.0 $0.00 22,471 - (22,471) - - -
FY20 LTI 1-Oct-19 3.0 $0.00 - 135,086 - - 135,086 -
FY20 IDP plan award 1-Oct-19 3.0 $0.00 - 110,746 - - 110,746 -
FY19 deferred STI 1-Oct-19 1.0 $0.00 - 15,466 - - 15,466 -
Total Performance
Rights 1,608,547 261,298 (615,075) (56,720) 1,198,050 -
Total All Plans 2,328,547 261,298 (1,040,075) (56,720) 1,493,050 295,000
Weighted average
exercise price 0.45 - 0.59 - 0.28 1.44
(1) The expiry date of the CEO incentive award options is 12 October 2020.
(1) The expiry date of the CEO incentive award options is 12 October 2020.
In valuing the performance rights, a number of assumptions were used as shown in the table below:
1 October 2019
Performance
Rights
Exercise price -
Share value at grant date $15.72
Expected volatility 35%
Expected dividend yield 1.23%
Risk free interest rate 0.66%
The expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which the price is expected to fluctuate during a period.
2020 2019
$’000 $’000
LTI performance rights/options plans 1,631 3,142
1,631 3,142
Refer to the Remuneration Report, which forms part of the Directors’ Report for further details regarding KMP’s remuneration.
(1) For the year ended 30 June 2020, other consultancy service primarily relates to IT support services in relation to Human Resource Application
software. The IT support services company (Presence of IT) was acquired by Deloitte during FY20.
26. Subsidiaries
Details of the Group’s subsidiaries at the end of the reporting period are as follows:
(1) IDP Education Limited owns 100% ordinary Class A shares, which represents 49% of total shares of IDP Education Australia (Thailand) Co. Ltd and
IDP Education Services Co. Ltd. According to the company constitution, ordinary Class A shares holds 100% voting right of the company. Based on
these facts and circumstances, management determined that, in substance, the Group controls these entities with no non-controlling interest.
(2) Foundation controlled through IDP Education Limited’s capacity to control management of the company.
27. Associates
Accounting policy
An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate
in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies.
The results and assets and liabilities of associates are incorporated in these consolidated financial statements using
the equity method of accounting, except when the investment, or a portion thereof, is classified as held for sale, in
which case it is accounted for in accordance with AASB 5. Under the equity method, an investment in an associate is
initially recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the
Group’s share of the profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the associate. When the Group’s share of losses of
an associate exceeds the Group’s interest in that associate (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance,
form part of the Group’s net investment in the associate), the Group discontinues recognising its share of further losses.
Additional losses are recognised only to the extent that the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made
payments on behalf of the associate.
An investment in an associate is accounted for using the equity method from the date on which the investee becomes an
associate. On acquisition of the investment in an associate, any excess of the cost of the investment over the Group’s share
of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the investee is recognised as goodwill, which is included
within the carrying amount of the investment. Any excess of the Group’s share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets
and liabilities over the cost of the investment, after reassessment, is recognised immediately in profit or loss in the period
in which the investment is acquired.
The requirements of AASB 139 are applied to determine whether it is necessary to recognise any impairment loss with
respect to the Group’s investment in an associate. When necessary, the entire carrying amount of the investment (including
goodwill) is tested for impairment in accordance with AASB 136 Impairment of Assets as a single asset by comparing its
recoverable amount (higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposal) with its carrying amount, Any impairment
loss recognised forms part of the carrying amount of the investment. Any reversal of that impairment loss is recognised
in accordance with AASB 136 to the extent that the recoverable amount of the investment subsequently increases.
Summarised financial information in respect of the associates is set out below. The summarised financial information
below represents amounts shown in the associate’s financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Reconciliation of the above summarised financial information to the carrying amount of the interest in associates
recognised in the consolidated financial statements:
Balances
Trade and other payables (756) -
* These entities are not required to prepare and lodge a financial report and directors’ report under ASIC Corporations (Wholly owned Companies)
Instrument 2016/785 issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
The companies that are members of this deed guarantee the debts of the others and represent the “Closed Group” from
the date of entering into the agreement. These are the only members of the Deed of Cross Guarantee and therefore these
companies also represent the ‘Extended Closed Group’.
28.1. Statement of profit or loss, other comprehensive income and a summary of movements in consolidated
retained profits of the Closed Group for Deed of Cross Guarantee purposes
Statement of comprehensive income 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$’000 $’000
Revenue 282,018 308,667
Dividend income 6,886 7,242
Expenses (218,719) (227,680)
Depreciation and amortisation (17,111) (9,798)
Finance income 549 192
Finance costs (1,975) (2,028)
Share of profit/(loss) of associates (319) 19
Profit for the year before income tax expense 51,329 76,614
Income tax expense (16,870) (23,852)
Profit for the year of the Closed Group 34,459 52,762
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Net investment hedge of foreign operations 491 (777)
Exchange differences arising on translating the foreign operations 87 69
Gain/loss arising on changes in fair value of hedging instruments entered
into for cash flow hedges
Forward foreign exchange contracts (269) (806)
Cumulative gain/loss arising on changes in fair value of hedging instruments
reclassified to profit or loss 803 (343)
Income tax related to gains/losses recognised in other comprehensive income (309) 578
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: - -
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of income tax 803 (1,279)
Total comprehensive income for the year of the Closed Group 35,262 51,483
Financial information
Financial position 30 June 2020 30 June 2019
$’000 $’000
Current assets 370,894 102,485
Total assets 546,287 265,953
Current liabilities 193,333 140,751
Total liabilities 265,796 205,109
Equity
Issued capital 270,959 30,811
Retained earnings 4,022 21,014
Reserves 5,510 9,019
Total equity 280,491 60,844
During the year, the parent entity received $66.9m dividends income from the subsidiaries (2019: $62.2m).
Other than the matters reported above, there were no significant events since the balance sheet date.
Note 1 confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The Directors have been given the declarations by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by section
295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Melbourne
19 August 2020
We have audited the financial report of IDP Education Limited (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries
(the “Group”) which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2020,
the consolidated statement of profit or loss, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income,
the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for
the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations
Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2020 and of its
financial performance for the year then ended; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the
Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (including Independence Standards) (the Code) that are relevant to our audit of the
financial report in Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance
with the Code.
We confirm that the independence declaration required by the Corporations Act 2001, which has
been given to the directors of the Company would be in the same terms if given to the directors as
at the time of this auditor’s report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our opinion.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance
in our audit of the financial report for the current period. These matters were addressed in the
context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we
do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
96
Other Information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the
Directors’ Report included in the Group’s annual report for the year ended 30 June 2020 but does
not include the financial report and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and we do not express any
form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
report or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If,
based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this
other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of
the financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the ability of the Group
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to
cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of this financial report.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional
judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due
to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain
audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk
of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of
accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists
related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are
required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial
report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are
97
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and
events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the
entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the financial report.
We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group’s audit. We
remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing
of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control
that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other
matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions
taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current period and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter
should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would
reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 27 to 44 of the Director’s Report for
the year ended 30 June 2020.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of IDP Education Limited, for the year ended 30 June 2020,
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Responsibilities
The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the
Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Genevra Cavallo
Partner
Chartered Accountants
Melbourne, 19 August 2020
98
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 31 August 2020.
Top 20 holders
Rank Name Shares Held %
1 EDUCATION AUSTRALIA LIMITED 111,334,485 40.00
2 HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 79,234,828 28.47
3 J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED 34,675,119 12.46
4 CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 18,650,192 6.70
5 NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED 13,572,311 4.88
6 BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD 7,914,275 2.84
7 HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED-GSCO ECA 1,812,149 0.65
8 PACIFIC CUSTODIANS PTY LIMITED 1,285,808 0.46
9 MERRILL LYNCH (AUSTRALIA) NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 795,398 0.29
10 DIVERSIFIED UNITED INVESTMENT LIMITED 500,000 0.18
11 UBS NOMINEES PTY LTD 285,853 0.10
12 EASTY HOLDINGS PTY LTD 282,817 0.10
13 BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD HUB24 CUSTODIAL SERV LTD 261,166 0.09
14 HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED - A/C 2 248,703 0.09
15 MR ANDREW BARKLA 195,000 0.07
16 BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD 172,208 0.06
17 INVIA CUSTODIAN PTY LIMITED 149,495 0.05
18 BNP PARIBAS NOMS(NZ) LTD 137,289 0.05
19 NAVIGATOR AUSTRALIA LIMITED 135,051 0.05
20 AMP LIFE LIMITED 134,680 0.05
Total equity 271,776,827 97.64
Balance of register 6,559,384 2.36
Grand total 278,336,211 100.00
Substantial Shareholders
% of issued
Range Shares Held(1) Capital
Education Australia Limited(2) 111,964,481 40.23
The British Council (3)
111,964,481 40.23
The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge acting
by the University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate (UCLES)(3) 111,964,481 40.23
The Capital Group Companies Inc 20,870,787 7.50
Bennelong Australia Equity Partners Ltd 19,679,196 7.07
(1) Number of shares held by substantial shareholders is based on the most recent notifications lodged by substantial shareholders with the ASX
(2) Education Australia Limited holds 111,334,485 shares directly and has a relevant interest in 629,996 shares which are held by the IDP Education
Employee Share Trust
(3) The British Council and UCLES have a relevant interest in all of the fully paid ordinary shares in IDP Education held by Education Australia
Limited pursuant to sections 608(1)(b) and 608(1)(c) of the Corporations Act.
Distribution of Shareholders
% of issued Number of
Name Shares Capital Holders %
100,001 and Over 271,715,825 97.62 26 0.56
10,001 to 100,000 2,415,738 0.87 99 2.12
5,001 to 10,000 1,078,340 0.39 152 3.26
1,001 to 5,000 2,143,818 0.77 900 19.28
1 to 1,000 982,490 0.35 3,491 74.79
Total 278,336,211 100.00 4,668 100.00
There were 124 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.
Website
www.idp.com
ABN
59 117 676 463